188IR 188PT EC DECAY (10.16 D) 1978EL11 18NDS 201806
188IR H TYP=FUL$AUT=F.G. KONDEV, S. JUUTINEN, D.J. HARTLEY$
188IR2 H CIT=NDS 150, 1 (2018)$CUT=1-Feb-2018$
188IR C 1978EL11: Measured G, GG, CE-G coin
188IR C Others:
188IR C G, GG: 1970BA53, 1970BA10, 1969PL07, 1968HA23, 1967KO22, 1965JA06
188IR C CE: 1963PR12, 1962CA27, 1964SA30, 1962KR05, 1961KR02, 1958FIZZ
188IR C CE G(T), GG(T): 1969MA37, 1970BA53, 1965JA06, 1965KR03
188IR CG $I(XK)=506 50 (1978EL11), 486 50 (1969PL07), 520 78 (1968HA23)
188IR CL E$From a least-squares fit to EG's
188IR CL J$From adopted levels
188IR CG E,RI$From 1978El11. The RI values reported in 1978El11, 1968Ha23 and
188IR2CG 1969Pl07 are consistent, except as noted
188IR CG M$From the CE data of 1963PR12 and RI data of 1978El11,
188IR2CG and sub-shell ratios of 1962Ca27, 1964Sa30 and 1963Pr12
188IR CG MR$Deduced using the BrIccmixing program (v.23). Uncertainties of 10%
188IR2CG are assumed for the input data, if not specifically given by the
188IR3CG authors
188IR DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
188PT P 0 0+ 10.16 D 18 524 9
188IR N 0.191 GE 1.0 1.0
188IR CN NR$from SUMOF
188IR2CN TI (G's to GS) > 85%, by assuming <15% feeding to the g.s. From the
188IR3CN measured I(XK) in 1968HA23, it has been concluded by the authors that
188IR4CN the direct feeding to the first three levels at 0.0, 54.8 and 96.7 KEV
188IR5CN is 5(10)%. However, from intensity balances in the present decay scheme
188IR6CN no direct feeding to the 54.8 and 96.7 KEV levels is deduced.
188IR CN BR$%EC=99.999974 3, %A=2.6E-5 3
188IR PN 4
188IR L 0.0 1-
188IR E 15 LE 7.5 GE
188IRS E CK=0.7796 9$CL=0.1662 7$CM+=0.05420 25
188IR L 54.80 4 2- 1.93 NS 10
188IR CL T$From 54.8e(L{-II}+L{-III})-140.3e(K)(t) in 1969Ma37. Others:
188IR2CL 2.3 NS 2 (1965Ja06) and 2.7 NS 8 (1965Kr03,1970Ba53), but the
188IR3CL accuracy of those values is disputed in 1969Ma37
188IR G 54.85 5 3.9 4 M1+E2 0.65 4 24.5 17 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.75
188IRS G LC=18.6 13$MC=4.7 4
188IRS G NC=1.13 8$OC=0.176 12$PC=0.00269 9
188IR CG M,MR$from ELC=12.7, L1/L2/L3=39/100/100 (1963PR12) and
188IR2CG L1/L2=0.27 6, L1/L3=0.29 6 (1962CA27).
188IR CG RI$Note that RI=1.6 8 in 1968Ha23
188IR L 96.74 4 2- 1.59 NS 12
188IR CL T$From 41.9e(L)-381.6|g(t) in 1969Ma37.
188IR G 41.98 5 2.7 3 M1+E2 0.070 7 14.8 4 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.52
188IRS G LC=11.37 25$MC=2.64 6
188IRS G NC=0.649 15$OC=0.1134 24$PC=0.00789 12
188IR CG M,MR$from L1/L2/L3=100/11/5.7 (1963PR12) and L1/L2=7.1 10 (1962CA27)
188IR G 96.70 5 0.9 4 E2+M1 1.41 4 5.78 9 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.17
188IRS G KC=2.38 7$LC=2.57 5$MC=0.652 13
188IRS G NC=0.158 3$OC=0.0245 5$PC=0.000297 9
188IR CG M,MR$from K/L1/L2/L3=100/14/54/38 (1963PR12)
188IR L 187.61 7(1)- 56 PS 13
188IR cL T$From KLL-187.59(L{-I})(t) in 1969Ma37
188IR E 27.8 AP 6.8 AP
188IRS E CK=0.748 3$CL=0.1889 20$CM+=0.0630 8
188IR CE $CK/EC(exp)=0.753 13. Weighted average of 0.747 15 (1978EL11)
188IR2CE and 0.766 23 (1968HA23)
188IR G 132.86 10 1.3 3 E2 1.503 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.25
188IRS G KC=0.456 7$LC=0.788 12$MC=0.202 3
188IRS G NC=0.0489 7$OC=0.00751 11$PC=4.60E-5 7
188IR CG M$EL2C=0.69; L2/L3=1.5 (1962CA27)
188IR G 187.59 10 100 5 E2(+M1) 29 AP 0.431 C
188IR2 G %IG>19.1
188IRS G KC AP 0.201$LC AP 0.1734$MC AP 0.0441
188IRS G NC AP 0.01068$OC AP 0.001662$PC AP 2.01E-5
188IR CG M,MR$ K/L1/L2/L3/M/N=1.0/0.16/0.02/0.002/0.044/0.01 (1964SA30)
188IR L 195.10 5 1- 51 PS 10
188IR cL T$From KLL-195.05(L{-I})(t) in 1969Ma37
188IR E 44 AP 6.5 AP
188IRS E CK=0.746 3$CL=0.1905 21$CM+=0.0637 8
188IR CE $CK/EC(exp)=0.741 12. Weighted average of 0.740 15 (1978EL11)
188IR2CE and 0.744 20 (1968HA23)
188IR G 98.37 5 1.75 17M1(+E2) 0.1 LT 6.41 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.34
188IRS G KC=5.27 8$LC=0.882 17$MC=0.204 5
188IRS G NC=0.0501 10$OC=0.00884 17$PC=0.000655 10
188IR CG M,MR$from EKC=6.7 and K/L1/L2=100/15/1.5 (1963PR12)
188IR G 140.35 10 12.0 6 M1(+E2) 0.13 LT 2.32 C
188IR2 G %IG>2.30
188IRS G KC=1.91 3$LC=0.316 6$MC=0.0730 13
188IRS G NC=0.0180 3$OC=0.00317 5$PC=0.000236 4
188IR CG M,MR$from EKC=1.32 and K/L1/L2/L3=100/21/1.5/LT 0.2 (1963PR12)
188IR G 195.05 10 96 5 M1(+E2) 0.1 LT 0.918 14 C
188IR2 G %IG>18.4
188IRS G KC=0.757 11$LC=0.1238 18$MC=0.0285 4
188IRS G NC=0.00701 10$OC=0.001241 18$PC=9.32E-5 14
188IR CG M,MR$from EKC=0.89, K/L=6.55 7, L/M=3.47 3 (1962CA27). Other:
188IR2CG K/L1/L2/L3/M/N=1.0/0.17/0.01/0.002/0.043/0.01 (1964SA30)
188IR L 280.30 15 (1,2)-
188IR E 0.37 AP 8.3 AP
188IRS E CK=0.706 7$CL=0.219 5$CM+=0.0748 19
188IR G 92.9 2 0.12 AP[M1,E2] 7.56 12 ?
188IR2 G %IG>0.023
188IRS G KC=6.23 10$LC=1.028 16$MC=0.237 4
188IRS G NC=0.0582 9$OC=0.01031 16$PC=0.000776 12
188IR G 280.30 15 1.6 2 E2+M1 1.16 +27-210.211 23
188IR2 G %IG>0.31
188IRS G KC=0.160 21$LC=0.0388 13$MC=0.00932 23
188IRS G NC=0.00228 6$OC=0.000382 14$PC=1.9E-5 3
188IR CG M,MR$from EKC=0.16
188IR L 478.17 7 1+ 150 PS LT
188IR cL T$From LMM - 300 (and higher)|g(t) in 1969Ma37
188IR E 12.8 AP 4.6 AP
188IRS E CL=0.65 5$CM+=0.35 5
188IR CE $CK/EC(exp)<0.003 (1978EL11), CL/EC(exp)=0.67 (1978EL11)
188IR G 197.8 4 0.3 LT(E1) 0.0702 11 ?
188IR2 G %IG>0.03
188IRS G KC=0.0578 9$LC=0.00957 15$MC=0.00220 4
188IRS G NC=0.000535 8$OC=9.09E-5 14$PC=5.45E-6 8
188IR CG M$EKC<2.6
188IR G 283.15 20 0.54 27[E1] 0.0290 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.10
188IRS G KC=0.0240 4$LC=0.00384 6$MC=0.000882 13
188IRS G NC=0.000215 3$OC=3.69E-5 6$PC=2.36E-6 4
188IR G 290.64 20 0.55 20[E1] 0.0272 C
188IR2 G %IG>0.11
188IRS G KC=0.0226 4$LC=0.00360 5$MC=0.000826 12
188IRS G NC=0.000201 3$OC=3.46E-5 5$PC=2.23E-6 4
188IR G 381.43 10 38.5 20E1 0.01445 C
188IR2 G %IG>7.4
188IRS G KC=0.01202 17$LC=0.00188 3$MC=0.000429 6
188IRS G NC=0.0001047 15$OC=1.81E-5 3$PC=1.217E-6 17
188IR CG M$EKC=0.0144
188IR G 423.34 10 22.5 12E1 0.01144 C
188IR2 G %IG>4.3
188IRS G KC=0.00953 14$LC=0.001474 21$MC=0.000337 5
188IRS G NC=8.22E-5 12$OC=1.429E-5 20$PC=9.72E-7 14
188IR CG M$EKC=0.0078
188IR G 478.3 5 9.2 15E1 0.00876
188IR2 G %IG>1.8
188IRS G KC=0.00731 11$LC=0.001119 16$MC=0.000256 4
188IRS G NC=6.24E-5 9$OC=1.087E-5 16$PC=7.52E-7 11
188IR CG M$EKC<0.02