186PT 186AU EC DECAY (10.7 M) 1972FI12,1985VA07 22NDS 202207
186PT H TYP=FUL$AUT=J. C. Batchelder and A. M. Hurst, M. S. Basunia$
186PT2 H CIT=NDS 183, 1 (2022)$CUT=1-Mar-2022$
186PT c Others: 1970Jo02, 1995AnZZ, 1996St12.
186PT c 1985Va07: measured low-temperature nuclear orientation;
186PT2c deduced multipolarity, |d from |g(|q,H,t) data; revised
186PT3c level scheme.
186PT c 1972Fi12: measured E|g, I|g, I(ce), |g|g coin, ce-|g coin.
186PT c 1970Jo02: measured I(ce), E(ce).
186PT c The decay scheme is essentially that of 1985Va07.
186PT cG E,RI$From 1972Fi12, unless noted otherwise.
186PT cG E(Y)$Placement from 1222~keV level in 1972Fi12 and from 1838~keV level
186PT2cG in 1985Va07. However, 1985Va07 level scheme based on 1972Fi12 and
186PT3cG 1978CoYZ. In 1978CoYZ, placement of this |g-ray from both states.
186PT4cG Evaluators adopt 1978CoYZ placement.
186PT cG RI(X),TI(X),M(X)$For the 607 doublet, |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3}
186PT2cG (1972Fi12), consistent with a large E0 component. The 607 ce(K) is
186PT3cG coincident with the 192|g, but the 607|g is not (1972Fi12). The ce(K)
186PT4cG intensity from 1972Fi12 (0.84 {I12} for doublet) has been divided
186PT5cG assuming that the 607 transition from the 799 level is pure E0 (i.e.,
186PT6cG that none of the observed I(607|g) deexcites that level); the ce(K)
186PT7cG component from the 607 level was deduced from I(607.2|g) and |a(K)(E2
186PT8cG theory) and, from the remaining ce(K), ce(total) for the 799 to 192
186PT9cG transition was calculated using E0 theory. It should be noted,
186PTAcG however, that 607 keV gammas are reported from both the 607 and the
186PTBcG 799 levels in (|a,6n|g). Mult=(E0+M1+E2) (rather than pure E0) is
186PTxcG assigned to the 799 to 192 transition.
186PT cG RI(A) I|g(798.7|g+800.4|g)=2.1 {I2}; based on adopted branching,
186PT2cG essentially all the intensity is attributable to the 798.7|g.
186PT cG M,MR From measured |a(K)exp (1972Fi12, assuming 192|g is E2) and
186PT2cG |g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07). The multipolarity of the 192|g is established
186PT3cG from conversion electron subshell ratios (1970Jo02).
186PT cG TI From I(ce(K)) in 1972Fi12 and ce(K)/ce(total) from E0 theory,
186PT2cG except as noted.
186PT cL E From least-squares adjustment of E|g.
186PT DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3a (10-Sep-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
186PT cG MR$If no value given it was assumed |d=1.00 for E2/M1, |d=1.00 for
186PT2cG E3/M2 and |d=0.10 for the other multipolarities
186AU P 0.0 3- 10.7 M 5 6.15E3 3
186PT N 0.62 4 0.62 4 1.00
186PT cN NR$Normalized assuming I(|g+ce)(191.5+471.6+607.2+798.7+1176.1)= 100.
186PT PN 3
186PT G 257.9 3 1.40 8
186PT2 G %IG=0.87 8
186PT G 440.3 3 2.0 1 (E1,E2)
186PT2 G %IG=1.25 10
186PT2 G EKC=0.021 15 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.017 8$ LC=0.0044 30$ MC=0.0011 8
186PT G 791.0 3 2.0 1
186PT2 G %IG=1.25 10
186PT G 907.7 4 0.5 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.31 7
186PT G 956.7 4 0.1AP
186PT2 G %IG=0.06 4
186PT cG Placed from 957 level by 1985Va07.
186PT G 1345.5 4 0.8 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.50 7
186PT G 1400.0 4 0.55 6
186PT2 G %IG=0.34 5
186PT G 1532.7 4 1.6 2
186PT2 G %IG=1.00 14
186PT G 1589.5 4 0.7 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.44 7
186PT L 0.0 0+ 2.10 H 5
186PT L 191.53 4 2+ 260 PS 10
186PT2 L G=0.27 3 (1996St12)
186PT cL J 2+ from 192|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT cL T from 1972Fi12
186PT cL g-factor, relative to g[{+192}Pt, 2+]=0.30 {I1}, is from
186PT2cL transient field IMPAC measurements of 1996St12.
186PT E 16 5 8.9 25 6.82 13 25 7
186PTS E EAV=2241 14$CK=0.290 4$CL=0.0491 6$CM+=0.01556 18
186PT G 191.53 4 100 7E2 0.417
186PT2 G %IG=62.4 11
186PT cG E from ce data of 1970Jo02; 191.5 {I3} from 1972Fi12.
186PT cG K:L1:L2:L3=100:20 {I3}:54 {I5}:42 {I5} (1970Jo02).
186PT2cG (L1+L2)/L3=1.89 {I23}, L1/L2=0.34 {I5} from 1970Jo02).
186PT3cG |a{-k}=0.19 (1972Fi12).
186PTS G KC=0.189 3$LC=0.1712 24$MC=0.0438 7
186PTS G NC=0.01069 15$OC=0.001699 24$PC=1.80E-5 3
186PT L 471.53 18 0+
186PT G 279.7 3 2.2 1E2 0.1216
186PT2 G %IG=1.37 11
186PT2 G EKC=0.09 3 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0728 11$LC=0.0369 6$MC=0.00928 14
186PTS G NC=0.00227 4$OC=0.000369 6$PC=7.26E-6 11
186PT G 471.6 5 E0
186PT2 G EKC GT 1.7 (1972Fi12)$
186PT cG RI I|g<0.4. A very weak |g observed by 1972Fi12 at 470.8 keV
186PT2cG can be explained, by summing 191.5 + 279.7.
186PT L 490.34 9 4+
186PT cL J 4+ from 299|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 8.8 11 5.8 7 6.96 6 14.6 18
186PTS E EAV=2102 14$CK=0.324 4$CL=0.0549 7$CM+=0.01741 20
186PT G 298.84 10 41 2E2 0.0996
186PT2 G %IG=25.6 19
186PT2 G EKC=0.065 6 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0617 9$LC=0.0287 4$MC=0.00719 11
186PTS G NC=0.001762 25$OC=0.000287 4$PC=6.21E-6 9
186PT cG E from ce data of 1970Jo02; 298.6 {I3} from 1972Fi12.
186PT L 607.15 12 2+
186PT E 4.9 9 3.5 7 7.16 9 8.4 16
186PTS E EAV=2048 14$CK=0.338 4$CL=0.0574 7$CM+=0.01819 21
186PT G 415.56 16 13.7 6M1+E2 -0.38 4 0.116 3
186PT2 G %IG=8.6 7
186PT2 G EKC=0.097 12 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0953 23$LC=0.0160 3$MC=0.00370 7
186PTS G NC=0.000915 17$OC=0.000164 3$PC=1.07E-5 3
186PT cG E from ce data of 1970Jo02; 415.5 {I3} from 1972Fi12.
186PT2cG Other |a(K)exp: 0.072 {I30} (1970Jo02).
186PT cG MR -0.38 {I4} or +19 {I+20-8} from |g(|q,H,t);
186PT2cG 0.3 {I3} from |a(K)exp. -0.38 results in |a{-k}=0.95 which fits
186PT3cG value from (1972Fi12).
186PT G 607.2 3 8.5 20[E2] 0.01567 X
186PT2 G %IG=5.3 13
186PTS G KC=0.01200 17$LC=0.00280 4$MC=0.000671 10
186PTS G NC=0.0001652 24$OC=2.83E-5 4$PC=1.270E-6 18
186PT L 798.49 12 2+
186PT E 2.9 5 2.4 4 7.30 8 5.3 9
186PTS E EAV=1960 14$CK=0.363 4$CL=0.0616 7$CM+=0.01953 22
186PT G 307.9 3 0.66 5E2 0.0912
186PT2 G %IG=0.41 4
186PT2 G EKC=0.10 6 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0573 9$LC=0.0257 4$MC=0.00642 10
186PTS G NC=0.001573 23$OC=0.000257 4$PC=5.78E-6 9
186PT G 326.8 3 1.3010E2 0.0766
186PT2 G %IG=0.81 8
186PT2 G EKC=0.08 5 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0494 7$LC=0.0206 3$MC=0.00514 8
186PTS G NC=0.001259 19$OC=0.000206 3$PC=5.03E-6 8
186PT G 607.01 15 (E0+M1+E2) 0.85 14X
186PT cG E from ce data of 1970Jo02 for doublet which is apparently
186PT2cG dominated by this transition.
186PT G 798.7 4 8.610 0.00863
186PT2 G %IG=5.4 7
186PT2 G EKC LE 0.022 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.00686 10$LC=0.001360 20$MC=0.000321 5
186PTS G NC=7.92E-5 12$OC=1.379E-5 20$PC=7.26E-7 11
186PT L 877.3 4 6+
186PT cL J 6+ from 387|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT G 387.0 3 1.7 5 E2 0.0478
186PT2 G %IG=1.1 4
186PTS G KC=0.0329 5$LC=0.01133 17$MC=0.00280 4
186PTS G NC=0.000686 10$OC=0.0001138 17$PC=3.40E-6 5
186PT L 956.55 14 3+
186PT E 3.5 4 3.1 4 7.16 6 6.6 8
186PTS E EAV=1887 14$CK=0.384 5$CL=0.0653 8$CM+=0.02071 23
186PT G 349.4 3 2.1013M1+E2 +2.7 3 0.080 4
186PT2 G %IG=1.31 12
186PT2 G EKC=0.057 19 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.057 4$LC=0.0175 4$MC=0.00429 9
186PTS G NC=0.001054 22$OC=0.000176 4$PC=6.1E-6 4
186PT cG MR +0.70 {I6} or +2.8 {I3} from |g(|q,H,t); >1.7 from
186PTxcG |a(K)exp.
186PT G 466.3 3 2.1 1(M1+E2) 0.062 33
186PT2 G %IG=1.31 11
186PTS G KC=0.049 28$LC=0.0093 32$MC=0.00219 70
186PTS G NC=5.4E-4 18$OC=9.5E-5 34$PC=5.5E-6 33
186PT cG |d(D,Q)=+0.42 {I7} or +3.8 {I9} from |g(|q,H,t);
186PT2cG |D|p=no from level scheme.
186PT G 765.4 3 17.0 9M1+E2 +16 +4-3 0.00950
186PT2 G %IG=10.6 9
186PT2 G EKC=0.0094 16 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.00752 11$LC=0.001520 22$MC=0.000360 6
186PTS G NC=8.86E-5 13$OC=1.540E-5 22$PC=7.96E-7 12
186PT cG MR +0.322 {I16} or +16 {I+4-3} from |g(|q,H,t);
186PTxcG 2.6 {I+45-8} from |a(K)exp.
186PT L 991.51 22 4+
186PT E 2.0 3 1.9 2 7.37 6 3.9 5
186PTS E EAV=1871 14$CK=0.389 5$CL=0.0661 8$CM+=0.02097 24
186PT G 384.3 3 3.0 5 E2 0.0487
186PT2 G %IG=1.9 4
186PT2 G EKC=0.051 30 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0334 5$LC=0.01161 17$MC=0.00287 4
186PTS G NC=0.000703 10$OC=0.0001166 17$PC=3.46E-6 5
186PT cG M D admixture possible; |d(M1,E2)>1.1 from |a(K)exp.
186PT G 501.3 3 3.5 3 M1+E2 -0.85 9 0.055 3
186PT2 G %IG=2.18 23
186PT2 G EKC=0.06 3 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.045 3$LC=0.0080 3$MC=0.00188 7
186PTS G NC=0.000464 17$OC=8.2E-5 4$PC=5.0E-6 3
186PT cG MR -0.85 {I9} or +10 {I+11-3} from |g(|q,H,t);
186PTxcG 0.3 {I+16-3} from |a(K)exp.
186PT cG Tentative placement from 1972Fi12; confirmed in (|a,6n|g).
186PT L 1176.03 20 2+
186PT cL J 2+ from 985|g(|q,H,t) or 704|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.92 10 0.96 10 7.63 6 1.88 20
186PTS E EAV=1787 14$CK=0.416 5$CL=0.0707 8$CM+=0.02243 25
186PT G 704.4 3 0.9 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.56 8
186PT2 G EKC=0.017 13 (1972Fi12)$
186PT G 984.5 4 2.1 2 M1+E2
186PT2 G %IG=1.31 15
186PT cG M,MR from |g(|q,H,t); |d=-0.12 {I6} or +3.2 {I8} (1985Va07).
186PT G 1176.1 5 1.0 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.62 8
186PT L 1222.59 15 4+
186PT cL J 4+ from 424|g(|q,H,t) or 1031|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 1.5 1 1.7 2 7.38 5 3.2 3
186PTS E EAV=1765 14$CK=0.423 5$CL=0.0719 8$CM+=0.02282 25
186PT G 266.5 4 0.42 4 ?
186PT2 G %IG=0.26 3
186PT cG Assignment to {+186}Au |e decay is not certain (1972Fi12).
186PT G 423.9 3 1.0 1E2 0.0375
186PT2 G %IG=0.62 8
186PT2 G EKC=0.04 3 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0266 4$LC=0.00835 12$MC=0.00205 3
186PTS G NC=0.000503 8$OC=8.40E-5 12$PC=2.77E-6 4
186PT G 615.6 3 0.50 5 &
186PT2 G %IG<0.31
186PT2 G FLAG=Y
186PT G 732.4 3 1.8 1E0+M1+E2 0.07 3
186PT2 G %IG=1.12 10
186PT2 G EKC=0.057 22 (1972Fi12)$
186PT cG 1985Va07 deduce |d=+0.07 {I10} or +0.83 {I17} from
186PTxcG |g(|q,H,t).
186PT G 1031.0 3 2.2 1E2 0.00515
186PT2 G %IG=1.37 11
186PTS G KC=0.00418 6$LC=0.000746 11$MC=0.0001741 25
186PTS G NC=4.29E-5 6$OC=7.56E-6 11$PC=4.41E-7 7
186PT cG M Q from |g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT L 1363.40 21 (5+)
186PT cL J 3+,4+ from 873|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07); however, J=5 is also
186PT2cL consistent with experiment.
186PT E 0.23 3 0.70 8 9.66 6 0.93 11 1U
186PTS E EAV=1661 14$CK=0.615 4$CL=0.1077 7$CM+=0.03432 23
186PT DE $ 0.42 6 0.51 7 7.86 8 0.93 11
186PT2DE EAV=1687 64 $CK=0.449 23 $CL=0.076 4 $CM+=0.0243 13
186PT G 873.1 2 2.0 1
186PT2 G %IG=1.25 10
186PT cG E |DE=2 keV in 1972Fi12 is probably a typographical error.
186PT L 1407.79 15 3-
186PT cL J 3- from 1216|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 2.0 3 2.4 4 7.18 8 4.4 7
186PTS E EAV=1680 14$CK=0.451 5$CL=0.0768 9$CM+=0.0244 3
186PT G 231.7 3 0.93 7(E1) 0.0487
186PT2 G %IG=0.58 6
186PT2 G EKC=0.07 4 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0401 6$LC=0.00662 10$MC=0.001527 22
186PTS G NC=0.000374 6$OC=6.49E-5 10$PC=3.56E-6 5
186PT cG M E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; E2 is inconsistent with level scheme.
186PT G 609.4 3 2.4 6
186PT2 G %IG=1.5 4
186PT G 800.4 4 2.1LT A
186PT2 G %IG=0.7 7
186PT G 917.5 4 0.7 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.44 7
186PT G 1216.2 3 6.0 3E1 1.52E-3
186PT2 G %IG=3.7 3
186PT2 G EKC LT 0.0028 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.001257 18$LC=0.000183 3$MC=4.16E-5 6
186PTS G NC=1.024E-5 15$OC=1.84E-6 3$PC=1.240E-7 18$IPC=2.27E-5 4
186PT L 1417.90 18 (3)+
186PT cL J From Adopted Levels. 2+,3+ from 1226|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.77 7 0.95 8 7.59 5 1.72 15
186PTS E EAV=1676 14$CK=0.453 5$CL=0.0771 9$CM+=0.0245 3
186PT G 461.8 3 0.16 LEM1(+E2+E0)
186PT2 G %IG=0.100 7
186PT2 G EKC GE 0.5 (1972Fi12)$
186PT cG RI limit, given as |>0.16 in 1972Fi12, is presumed to
186PT2cG mean |<0.16.
186PT G 810.7 3 0.61 6
186PT2 G %IG=0.38 5
186PT G 927.3 4 0.4 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.25 7
186PT G 1226.1 3 1.6 1
186PT2 G %IG=1.00 9
186PT L 1612.2 4
186PT E 0.18 3 0.25 4 8.12 8 0.43 7
186PTS E EAV=1587 14$CK=0.484 5$CL=0.0825 9$CM+=0.0262 3
186PT G 1121.9 3 0.7 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.44 7
186PT L 1633.00 17 4-
186PT E 0.44 12 0.66 18 7.71 12 1.1 3
186PTS E EAV=1578 14$CK=0.487 5$CL=0.0831 9$CM+=0.0264 3
186PT G 225.1 3 0.70 5 M1+E2 1.3 +14-5 0.40 11
186PT2 G %IG=0.44 5
186PT2 G EKC=0.29 11 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.29 11$LC=0.0887 16$MC=0.0218 5
186PTS G NC=0.00534 10$OC=0.000894 22$PC=3.1E-5 13
186PT cG MR from |a(K)exp.
186PT G 676.5 3 5.3 2E1(+M2) -0.14 10 0.0054 9
186PT2 G %IG=3.31 25
186PT2 G EKC=0.0051 37 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.00387 19$LC=0.00059 4$MC=0.000135 9
186PTS G NC=3.32E-5 21$OC=5.9E-6 4$PC=3.80E-7 25
186PT G 1142.7 3 0.67 7(E1) 1.67E-3
186PT2 G %IG=0.42 6
186PTS G KC=0.001402 20$LC=0.000204 3$MC=4.65E-5 7
186PTS G NC=1.147E-5 16$OC=2.06E-6 3$PC=1.381E-7 20$IPC=4.22E-6 7
186PT cG M D from |g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07); |D|p=yes from level scheme.
186PT G 1441.3 4 0.76 7
186PT2 G %IG=0.47 6
186PT cG M $ |d(E3/M2)=+0.25{++44}{--21} or +3.7{++136}{--23} from
186PT2cG |g(|q,H,t), however an E3/M2 1141 keV transition would not
186PT3cG compete with a 1143 keV E1, multiplicity not adopted.
186PTS G KC=0.007 3$LC=0.0013 5
186PT cG MR +0.25 {I+44-21} or +3.7 {I+136-23} from |g(|q,H,t).
186PT L 1671.8 5 3+,4
186PT cL J 3+,4 from 1182|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.25 3 0.37 5 7.94 6 0.62 8
186PTS E EAV=1560 14$CK=0.494 5$CL=0.0842 9$CM+=0.0267 3
186PT G 1181.5 5 1.0 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.62 8
186PT L 1814.0 5
186PT E 0.18 3 0.32 4 7.99 7 0.50 7
186PTS E EAV=1496 14$CK=0.517 5$CL=0.0883 9$CM+=0.0280 3
186PT G 1323.7 4 0.8 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.50 7
186PT L 1838.11 18 (4)-
186PT cL J (4)- from 882|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 2.9 2 5.1 4 6.78 4 8.0 6
186PTS E EAV=1485 14$CK=0.521 5$CL=0.0890 9$CM+=0.0282 3
186PT G 205.0 3 3.3 2M1+E2 -0.309 23 0.824 14
186PT2 G %IG=2.06 18
186PTS G KC=0.669 12$LC=0.1190 18$MC=0.0278 5
186PTS G NC=0.00686 11$OC=0.001220 18$PC=7.62E-5 14
186PT cG |a{-k}=0.72 {I13} (1972Fi12) suggesting M1 multipolarity
186PT cG MR -0.309 {I23} or +1.79 {I9} from |g(|q,H,t);
186PTxcG 0.3 {I3} from |a(K)exp.
186PT G 430.3 3 2.9 2 M1+E2 +6.6 9 0.0379 8
186PT2 G %IG=1.81 17
186PT2 G EKC=0.027 12 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0272 7$LC=0.00812 13$MC=0.00198 3
186PTS G NC=0.000488 8$OC=8.17E-5 13$PC=2.86E-6 8
186PT cG MR +0.353 {I22} or +6.6 {I9} from |g(|q,H,t), >2 from
186PTxcG |a(K)exp.
186PT G 615.6 3 0.50 5 &
186PT2 G %IG<0.31
186PT2 G FLAG=Y
186PT G 881.6 3 3.4 2
186PT2 G %IG=2.12 19
186PT2 G EKC LE 0.018 (1972Fi12)$
186PTS G KC=0.0023 10$LC=0.00034 17$MC=8.E-5 4
186PTS G NC=1.9E-5 10$OC=3.4E-6 18$PC=2.3E-7 12
186PT cG (1/|d)=-24 {I18} (1985Va07) from |g(|q,H,t); |d|<0.9 from
186PT2cG |a(K)exp.
186PT L 1896.5 3 2+,3+
186PT cL J 2+,3+ from 1289|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.84 7 1.6 1 7.28 5 2.4 2
186PTS E EAV=1458 14$CK=0.531 5$CL=0.0907 9$CM+=0.0288 3
186PT G 905.1 3 0.6 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.37 7
186PT G 1098.0 3 0.68 7 ?
186PT2 G %IG=0.42 6
186PT cG Assignment to {+186}Au |e decay is not certain (1972Fi12).
186PT G 1289.2 5 3.3 2
186PT2 G %IG=2.06 18
186PT L 2159.6 3 4+
186PT cL J 2+,4+ from 1203|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.35 4 0.83 8 7.50 5 1.1812
186PTS E EAV=1339 14$CK=0.575 5$CL=0.0984 9$CM+=0.0312 3
186PT G 796.4 4 0.5 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.31 7
186PT G 1203.0 3 1.4 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.87 9
186PT L 2216.2 4 3+,4+
186PT cL J 3+,4+ from 1726|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 0.91 9 2.3 2 7.04 5 3.2 3
186PTS E EAV=1314 14$CK=0.585 5$CL=0.1001 9$CM+=0.0318 3
186PT G 1725.9 4 2.0 2
186PT2 G %IG=1.25 15
186PT G 2024.6 5 3.2 3
186PT2 G %IG=2.00 23
186PT L 2227.6 3 3+,4+
186PT cL J 3+,4+ from 1738|g(|q,H,t) (1985Va07).
186PT E 1.5 1 3.7 4 6.83 5 5.2 5
186PTS E EAV=1308 14$CK=0.587 5$CL=0.1004 9$CM+=0.0319 3
186PT G 1271.1 5 0.8 1
186PT2 G %IG=0.50 7
186PT G 1737.6 4 3.0 3
186PT2 G %IG=1.87 22
186PT G 2035.6 5 4.6 3
186PT2 G %IG=2.9 3