179OS    183PT A DECAY (6.5 M)         1966SI08,1995BI01         09NDS    200902
179OS  H TYP=FUL$AUT=Coral M. BAGLIN$CIT=NDS 110, 265 (2009)$CUT=15-Nov-2008$
179OS C  OTHERS: 1963GR08.
179OS C  ^T{-1/2}(183PT)=6.5 M 10 FROM 1963GR08.  OTHER : 7.0 M 25 (1966SI08).
179OS C  1995BI01: SOURCE FROM 165 MEV 19F BOMBARDMENT OF YB, MASS SEPARATION;
179OS2C  GELI, SI(LI) AND SI(AU) SURFACE BARRIER DETECTORS; MEASURED EA, IA,
179OS3C  I(X RAY).
179OS CA HF        For R0(179OS)=1.537 20 (WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF
179OS2CA R0(178OS)=1.538 25 AND R0(180OS)=1.536 31 (1998AK04)), %A=0.0096 5
179OS3CA (1995BI01), QA=4824 9 FROM EA=4719 9 (QA=4823 9 IN 2003AU03).
183PT  P 0.0          1/2-                6.5 M  10                 4823   9
179OS  N                        9.6E-5  5
179OS CN BR        FROM 1995BI01; BASED ON COMPARISON OF IA WITH INTENSITY OF
179OS2CN 183PT EC+B+ DECAY, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE 43 S COMPONENT OF THAT
179OS3CN DECAY.  OTHER DATA: %A AP 1.3E-3 (1963GR08), derived from
179OS4CN relative cross sections for production in various reactions, is
179OS5CN presumed to be accurate within a factor of 3; HOWEVER, 1995BI01
179OS6CN SUGGEST THAT AUTHORS MIGHT NOT HAVE ALLOWED FOR THE POSSIBILITY THAT
179OS7CN SOME OF THEIR OBSERVED EC+B+ INTENSITY COULD HAVE ARISEN FROM DECAY
179OS8CN OF THE 43 S 183PT ISOMER. 1995BI01 WOULD HAVE OBTAINED A SIMILAR
179OS9CN RESULT HAD THEY ASSUMED THAT THEIR OBSERVED EC+B+ INTENSITY AROSE
179OSACN FROM 183PT(GS) EC DECAY ALONE.
179OS  L 0.0           1/2-
179OS CL J         FROM Adopted Levels.
179OS  A 4719       9 100       1.24   23
179OS CA E         WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF 4714 10 (1995BI01), 4730 20 (1966SI08)
179OS2CA AND 4740 30 (1963GR08).