182W 182TA B- DECAY (114.74 D) 1992CH26,1992SU09,1990ME1515NDS 201512
182W H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 130, 21 (2015)$CUT=15-Jul-2015$
182W c Main references for E|g data: 2000He14 (evaluation and analysis),
182W 2c 1992Su09, 1990Me15, 1990Ja02, 1989Ka20, 1974La15
182W c Precise E|g measurements of low-energy (<300 keV) |g rays with
182W 2c curved-crystal spectrometers: 1975Bo05, 1973Pi02 (also 1974Be26),
182W 3c 1970Ne11, 1965Ed01, 1964Da15, 1962Se10, 1958Be73, 1957Su01, 1955Mu19,
182W 4c 1952Mu45
182W c Main references for I|g data: 1998Mi17, 1992Ch26, 1992Ke02, 1992Su09,
182W 2c 1990Me15, 1990Ja02, 1986Wa35, 1983Ji01, 1981Is08, 1980Sc07, 1977Ge12
182W 3c (also 1976He18), 1974La15, 1971Ja21, 1970Wh03, 1969Sa25, 1966Ko12,
182W 4c 1965Ed01, 1964Da15
182W c Main references for multipolarities and mixing ratios: 1992Ch26
182W 2c (|g|g(|q) and ce); 1983Ri05 (|g(|q,temp) and |g(lin pol,temp));
182W 3c 1980Sp01 (|g(|q),temp in {+182}Re decay); 1976He18 (ce),
182W 4c 1975Qu01 (|g|g(|q)); 1972Kr05 (|g(|q),temp); 1972He10 (|g|g(|q)
182W 5c and ce); 1971Ga37 (ce); 1967Ni03 (ce, subshell ratios for low
182W 6c energy transitions up to 264 keV), 1966Ko12 (ce), 1966Dz01 (ce)
182W 7c 1975We22 investigate E0 component in interband |DJ=0, |DPI=no
182W 8c transitions by comparing |g(ce)(|q) or (ce)(ce)|q) data with measured
182W 9c conversion coefficients. Also 1976Kl09 and 1990Ka35 for E0 transitions
182W c 2000He14: recommended |g-ray energies from evaluation and analysis
182W d 1999He10, 1997HeZZ, 1995HeZZ, 1994HeZZ, 1986HeZU, 1979He19, 1978He21
182W 2d are superseded by 2000He14
182W c 1998Mi17: |g-ray emission probabilities for selected transitions.
182W c 1997Ka47: cross sections in {+182}Ta(n,|g) and from
182W 2c multi-element standard (MES) technique deduced emission probabilities
182W 3c for two |g rays at 1189 and 1221 keV
182W c 1994KaZL: E|g measured for 100-keV |g ray, Ge detector
182W c 1992Ch26 (also 1989Ka20,1989Ka01,1981Ka22,1967Ma31): measured
182W 2c E|g, I|g, |g|g, ce, |g|g(|q), lifetime. For |g rays, HPGe detectors and
182W 3c for electrons mini-orange spectrometer were used
182W c 1992Su09 (also 1993Li03): Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin. In 1993Li03,
182W 2c five new |g rays and two new levels reported in 1990Ja02 were
182W 3c found to be non-existent
182W d 1986SuZS superseded by 1992Su09
182W c 1992Ke02: K-x rays and |g rays, emission probabilities
182W c 1992Yo05: measured 1189|g(|q,H,T), oriented {+182}Ta, search
182W 2c for violation of parity (P), time reversal (T) and PT through
182W 3c measurement of |g|g(|q) for 1189|g from 1289, 2- level which is
182W 4c close in energy to 1221, 2+ level. No results are reported
182W c 1991Fa12, 1983Fa18: |g anisotropy vs polarizing field and
182W 2c temperature, deduced nuclear quadrupole resonance, quadrupole moment
182W 3c and quadrupole interaction, nuclear orientation technique
182W d 1991Ki09, 1979Hn02: evaluated E|g measurements
182W c 1990Ja02 (1983El02 from the same lab): measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin,
182W 2c |g|g(t). Deduced |a(K)(exp) from their measured I|g and using ce(K)
182W 3c data from literature. 1983El02 report 15 new transitions and 5 new
182W 4c levels based on such transitions. A later study 1990Ja02 from the
182W 5c same laboratory retracted many of these transitions, yet contained
182W 6c five new transitions and two new levels, not reported in any other
182W 7c study. These were later disproved in the work of 1993Li03.
182W c 1990Me15: E|g, I|g
182W d 1978MeZZ superseded by 1990Me15
182W c 1990Ka35, 1977Ka30: ce, deduced E0 transitions
182W d 1989KaZR, 1989KaZF, 1987KaZO, 1985KaZP superseded by 1990Ka35
182W d 1990Ki11: Compiled E|b, I|b, ce
182W d 1988Wa26: two |g rays of 1121.301 {I4} and 1189.050 {I4} used
182W 2d for calibration purpose
182W c 1987Ba66: x rays, |g(L x ray)(|q), oriented nuclei, deduced anisotropy
182W c 1987Ka34: |g(|q,temp), deduced electric-field gradient.
182W c 1986Wa35: E|g, I|g
182W c 1986Bu19: KLL Auger electron energies and intensities, mag spec
182W d 1979BuZH superseded by 1986Bu19
182W c 1985Je05: E|g with a crystal spectrometer; energy of 67.7|g measured
182W 2c as 67.75016 {i12} keV
182W c 1985GoZK: evaluated low energy E|g data from curved-crystal data
182W c 1984He12: Deduced transition energies for {+182}Ta decay
182W c 1984AlZN: pair conversion spectra
182W d 1984AlZO is same as 1984AlZN
182W c 1983Ri05: |g(|q,T) and |g(lin pol,T) on oriented
182W 2c {+182}Ta, low temperature nuclear orientation
182W d 1981NoZT superseded by 1983Ri05
182W c 1983Ji01: E|g, I|g
182W c 1981Al21, 1980Al27: NMR, oriented nuclei in Fe, deduced g factor
182W c 1981Is08: E|g, I|g, |g|g coin
182W c 1981YoZX: I|g
182W c 1980Sc07 (also 1983De11 for 3 |g rays): I|g, T{-1/2}, |b|g coin and
182W 2c |g(x ray) coin
182W d 1976DeYV, 1976WaZH superseded by 1980Sc07
182W c 1980Al27: NMR on oriented nuclei, deduced |m
182W c 1980Ro22: I|g
182W c 1979MaZI: conversion electrons and K-x rays
182W c 1978Bu26: L-subshell ratios for 100-keV |g using magnetic spectrometer
182W c 1977Ka30: ce, penetration parameters
182W c 1977Ge12, 1976He18 (also 1971He20,1970Gr13,1967He18,1967He22):
182W 2c E|g, I|g, ce
182W d 1976GeZS, 1973HeYI, 1971HeYX, 1970GrZG, 1970HeZS superseded by
182W 2d 1977Ge12 and other primary publications
182W c 1977VyZX: E|g, I|g
182W d 1977VyZW, 1977VyZZ, 1976VyZZ are from the same group as 1977VyZX
182W c 1976Kl09: ce data for 1035.8 and 1135.9 transitions
182W d 1976KlZV superseded by 1976Kl09
182W c 1975Bo05: E|g, curved-crystal spectrometer
182W d 1975BoZG superseded by 1975Bo05
182W c 1975Gr15: |b|g(t), |g(ce)(t), deduced level lifetime
182W c 1975Qu01: |g|g(|q)
182W d 1974QuZY is thesis from the same lab as 1975Qu01, 1971QuZY an
182W 2d earlier conference abstract
182W c 1975We22: E|g, I|g, ce, |g(ce)(|q), (ce)(ce)(|q); data
182W 2c 1076, 1113, 1121, 1157, 1189, 1221, 1231 and 1427 |g rays
182W c 1975Be26: I|g of 31.7 and 42.7 |g rays
182W c 1974La15: E|g, I|g
182W c 1974Ha47: |g|g(|q,H), deduced g factor
182W c 1973Be55: K-x rays
182W c 1973El11: ce, E|g
182W c 1973Mi28: Subshell data for 100-keV transition
182W c 1973Pi02, 1974Be26: E|g by curved crystal spectrometer
182W c 1973Se14: |g|g(|q), |g|g(|q,H), deduced g factor
182W d 1973Se18, 1973Se19, 1973SeYL, 1972SeZM, 1971Se12 secondary references
182W 2d superseded by 1973Se14
182W c 1973Vi13: T{-1/2} of {+181}Ta g.s.
182W c 1973ScYU: |g|g(|q)
182W d 1973ScXD superseded by 1973ScYU
182W c 1973GrXX: |g|g(t), level lifetimes
182W c 1972Be94: |g|g(|q), |g|g(|q,H), deduced g factor
182W c 1972De67: E|g, I|g of 5 |g rays from 31-85 keV, Si detector
182W c 1972Em01: T{-1/2} of {+181}Ta g.s.
182W d 1972WyZZ superseded by 1972Em01
182W c 1972Ga23: I|g, ce, sub-shell ce data
182W c 1972He10: |g|g(|q), |g|g(|q,H), (ce)(ce)(t), L-subshell ce
182W c 1972He20: (ce)(ce)(t), |g|g(|q,H), ce; level lifetime and |m
182W c 1972Kr05: |g(|q,temp), oriented nuclei
182W d 1971KrZO, 1971KrZV superseded by 1972Kr05
182W c 1972Li11: |g(circ pol), deduced parity admixtures.
182W c 1972Si30: |b|g(|q), |b|g(circ pol), |b-longitudinal pol.
182W d 1971SiYU: thesis from the same lab as 1972Si30
182W c 1972Si33: |g|g(|q,H), deduced magnetic moment
182W d 1972SiYN superseded by 1972Si33
182W c 1972JeZZ: |g(circ pol), parity non-conservation
182W c 1971Ja21: I|g
182W d 1972JaZN superseded by 1971Ja21
182W c 1971Ho14: |b(ce)(t), |b|g(t), deduced level lifetimes.
182W d 1971MaYZ superseded by 1971Ho14
182W c 1971Ml01, 1971Ni02, 1970Ni13: I|g
182W c 1970Ab14: |g(ce)(t), |b|g(t), (ce)(ce)(t), |b(ce)(t), level lifetimes.
182W c 1970El09: ce
182W c 1970Pa33: |g|g|g(|q)
182W d 1970PaZX superseded by 1970Pa33
182W c 1970Ro15: |b|g(|q) for 521-keV |b transition
182W c 1970St03: I|g, ce
182W c 1970Wh03, 1969Wh03: E|g, I|g
182W c 1970Ne11: E|g by curved-crystal spectrometer: three |g rays measured
182W 2c at 67.748 {I2}, 84.678 {I3} and 100.106 {I3}
182W c 1969Sa25: E|g, I|g, |g|g coin
182W c 1968Bo01, 1968Bo38: ce data for M/L, K/L, K/L{-3} and
182W 2c (N+O)/M ratios for E2 transitions
182W c 1968Ho19, 1968Ni06, 1968Ni07, 1967Ni03: ce for M, K/L,
182W 2c L{-3}/M{-3}, M/(N+O+P) for E2 transitions
182W c 1968Me24: E|g, ce, subshell ratios
182W c 1967Ba01, 1966Ba41: E|b, I|b
182W c 1967Wa29: isotopic half-life
182W c 1967Pi05: E|g, I|g
182W c 1966Dz01: E|g, I|g, external conversion method
182W c 1966Ka13: ce for L subshells for E2 transitions
182W c 1966Ko12: E|g, I|g, ce for high-energy transitions
182W c 1966Me13, 1965Me08: |b|g(t), |b|g|g(t), |g|g(t), |g(ce)(t),
182W 2c deduced level lifetimes
182W c 1966Ra04: |g(ce)(t), deduced level lifetime.
182W c 1966Ve05: |b
182W c 1965Do02: |g|g(t) for first 2+ and 2- states in {+182}W
182W c 1965Ed01: I|g with curved-crystal spectrometer
182W c 1965Gr16: E|g, I|g
182W c 1964Da15: E|g, I|g, E|b, I|b, |b|g coin, ce, curved-crystal for E|g
182W c 1964Ha28: |b, |b|g coin
182W c 1964Ba12, 1964Ba47, 1963St16: ce
182W c 1963El08: |g|g coin
182W c 1963Ko02: |g|g(|q,H,t)
182W c 1963Kl04, 1963El02, 1960Hi02: |g|g(|q)
182W c 1962Se10: E|g, I|g using bent-crystal spectrometer
182W c 1965Me08, 1964R019, 1964Be36, 1963Ba24, 1961Go24: |b|g(t)
182W c 1965He07, 1964Ko07, 1962Mo15, 1961Vi07, 1961Vi02, 1961Va27,
182W 2c 1961Vo05, 1961Ry03, 1960Gv01, 1960Da11: E|g, I|g
182W c 1965Me08, 1964Ro19, 1964Be36, 1963Ko02, 1963Fo02, 1963Ba24, 1962Ba39:
182W 2c |g|g(t)
182W c 1958Be73: E|g using curved-crystal spectrometer
182W c 1957Su01: E|g, I|g with a curved-crystal spectrometer
182W c 1955Mu19: E|g, I|g, ce using curved-crystal spectrometer for |g rays
182W 2c and magnetic spectrometer for electrons
182W c Other (pre-1960) references (list may not be complete):
182W c 1959Vo27, 1952Mu45, 1950Co16: |g
182W c 1959Si84: |b, |g|g coin
182W c 1958Sp17, 1958Ke26, 1957Wr37, 1952Ei12, 1951Si25: {+182}Ta half-life
182W c Demuynck et al.: Compt. Rend. 244, 3050 (1957) (|b)
182W c Froman et al., Ark. Fys. 12, 399 (1957)
182W c Backstrom: Ark. Fys. 10, 387 (1956) (|g)
182W c Williams et al., Can. Jour. Phys. 34, 1087 (1956)
182W c 1955Su64: |g|g(t)
182W c 1954Su10: |b|g(t)
182W c Fowler et al. Phys. Rev. 94, 1082 (1954) (|g)
182W c 1949Be60: isotopic assignment, |g
182W c Goddard et al., Phys. Rev. 76, 1419 (1949) (|g)
182W c Cork et al., Phys. Rev. 75, 1778 (1949), ibid 72, 581 (1947) (ce)
182W c Jnanananda: J. Sci. Ind. Research (India) {+8}B, 147 (1949) (|b)
182W c Mandeville et al., Phys. Rev. 73, 340 (1948) (|b)
182W c Zumstein et al., Phys. Rev. 63, 59 (1943) (|g).
182W c First identifications of {+182}Ta in (n,|g):
182W 2c Fomin and Houtermans: Physik Z. Sowjetunion 9, 273 (1936);
182W 3c Oldenberg: Phys. Rev 53, 35 (1938); Naturwissenschaften 28, 578 (1940)
182W d Techniques or {+182}Ta source standardization for energy or intensity
182W 2d calibration purposes: 2008Ko07, 1997Sh20, 1995Ko44, 1990Gu31, 1988Wa26
182W c RADLST code (at www.nndc.bnl.gov) on the given level scheme gives
182W 2c total energy deposit of 1812 keV {I6} in agreement with
182W 3c Q value=1814.3 keV {I17}
182W cB From 1813|b measurements with a magnetic
182W 2cB spectrometer, 1967Ba01
182W 2cB report upper limit of |b feeding to g.s. of {+182}W as <0.001%
182W cB E$From 1967Ba01 (also 1966Ba41), 1964Ha28, 1966Ve05, and 1964Da15
182W cB E(D),IB(D)$From 1967Ba01, 1966Ba41 using 2|62 magnetic spectrometer
182W cG ------------------------------------------------------------
182W cG Data details for energies, relative intensities,
182W 2cG multipolarities and mixing ratios of |g rays used in the evaluation
182W 3cG process
182W cG
182W cG {B31.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: from table 4 of 2000He14; curved-crystal data of
182W 2cG 1973Pi02
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 2.44 {I7} (1992Ch26), 2.46 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 1.80 {I6}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 2.21 {I2} (1990Ja02), 2.75 {I6} (1990Me15), 2.53 {I6}
182W 3cG (1980Sc07); uncertainties increased to 0.3 in 1992Su09, 0.14 in
182W 4cG 1990Ja02 and 0.13 in 1990Me15. LWM gives 2.31 {I14} with reduced
182W 5cG |h{+2}=33. Other:1.18 {I12} (1981Is08) omitted as outlier.
182W cG Absolute intensity=2.48 {I6} (1980Sc07)
182W cG
182W cG {B42.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: from table 4 in 2000He14; curved-crystal data of
182W 2cG 1973Pi02
182W cG I|g: NRM, LWM average of 0.710 {I21} (1992Ch26), 0.754 {I18}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 0.827 {I24} (1992Su09), 0.82 {I3} (1990Ja02), 0.86 {I7}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 0.82 {I10} (1981Is08), 0.75 {I2} (1980Sc07), 0.70 {I4}
182W xcG (1965Ed01)
182W cG Absolute intensity=0.266 {I8} (1980Sc07)
182W cG
182W cG {B44.7|g}:
182W cG E|g, I|g: from 1992Su09 only. 42.72+44.66 form doublet
182W 2cG STRUCTURE.
182W 2cG Assignment by 1992Su09 in the level scheme is tentative
182W cG
182W cG {B65.7|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 8.40 {I21} (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 9.02 {I22} (1992Ke02), 7.61 {I16} (1992Su09), 8.55 {I7} (1990Ja02),
182W 3cG 8.75 {I17} (1990Me15), 8.04 {I40} (1965Ed01), 8.0 {I5} (1964Da15). LWM
182W 4cG gives 8.44 {I16} reduced |h{+2}=6.8. Other: 13.5 {I14} (1981Is08) is
182W xcG omitted as an outlier
182W cG
182W cG {B67.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: other: 67.75016 {I12} (1985Je05,curved crystal). It
182W 2cG seems this
182W 2cG value was not used in the analyses by 2000He14, although for {+161}Tb
182W 3cG decay, E|g values measured in 1985Je05 for three |g rays were used
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 131.8 {I25} (1992Ch26), 126.2 {I24}
182W 2cG (1992Su09),
182W 3cG 120.0 {I11} (1990Ja02), 131 {I10} (1990Me15), 122 {I6} (1977Ge12), 121
182W 4cG {I5} (1974La15), 118 {I6} (1965Ed01), 119 {I6} (1964Da15). Other:
182W 5cG 147.6 {I37} (1992Ke02) omitted as outlier, mixed with K-x rays. LWM
182W 6cG gives 123.3 {I33} with reduced |h{+2}=2.9
182W cG Mult, |d: RUL(M2)=1 implies |d<0.002, thus pure E1 is
182W 2cG assigned. Experimental limit: |d<0.02
182W cG
182W cG {B84.7|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 7.58 {I7} (1998Mi17), 7.65 {I7}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 7.43 {I12}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 7.80 {I16} (1992Su09), 7.31 {I5} (1990Ja02), 7.19 {I15}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 7.30 {I22} (1986Wa35), 7.64 {I60} (1981Is08), 7.45 {I17}
182W 4cG (1980Sc07,1983De11), 7.8 {I4} (1977Ge12), 7.82 {I16} (1974La15), 7.6
182W 5cG {I8} (1972Ga23), 6.7 {I10} (1971Ml01), 7.0 {I7} (1969Sa25), 7.56 {I36}
182W 6cG (1965Ed01), 8.3 {I6} (1964Da15); uncertainty increased to 0.09 in
182W 7cG 1990Ja02. LWM gives 7.48 {I17} with reduced |h{+2}=2.4
182W cG Absolute intensity=2.68 {I2} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: from Adopted Gammas. Others: +0.32 {I3} from A{-2}=-0.25
182W 2cG {I4} (1983Ri05),
182W 2cG +0.30 {I2} (1972Kr05), +0.31 {I5} (1975Qu01), 0.352 {I3} (1972He10)
182W cG
182W cG {B100.1|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 38.5 {I2} (1998Mi17), 41.4 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 40.5 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 42.6 {I5} (1992Su09), 40.45 {I51} (1990Ja02), 40.4 {I5}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 39.03 {I64} (1986Wa35), 40.3 {I6} (1983Ji01), 41.6 {I14}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 40.6 {I26} (1980Ro22), 40.33 {I98} (1980Sc07), 40.8 {I13}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 37.43 {I80} (1974La15), 40.3 {I40} (1972Ga23), 40.2 {I10}
182W 6cG (1971Ja21), 38 {I2} (1971Ml01), 40.7 {I41} (1969Sa25). Reduced
182W 7cG |h{+2}=2.0 with |D(I|g) increased to 0.11 in 1974La15. LWM gives 40.2
182W 8cG {I17} with reduced |h{+2}=4.8.
182W cG Absolute intensity=13.59 {I6} (1998Mi17)
182W cG Mult: L1/L2=0.0823 {I13}, L2/L3=1.126 {I10} (1978Bu26)
182W cG
182W cG {B110.4|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 110.41 {I4} (1992Su09), 110.391
182W 2cG {I12} (1990Me15).
182W 2cG E|g=109.52 {I19} in 1990Ja02 is an outlier, thus not used in averaging.
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.300 {I10} (1992Ch26), 0.32 {I2}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 0.37 {I3} (1992Su09), 0.30 {I4} (1990Ja02), 0.30 {I2} (1990Me15), 0.25
182W 3cG {I6} (1983Ji01), 0.25 {I4} (1981Is08)
182W cG
182W cG {B113.7|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 5.21 {I5} (1998Mi17), 5.27 {I10}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 5.34 {I6}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 5.64 {I11} (1992Su09), 5.31 {I8} (1990Ja02), 5.34 {I5}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 4.44 {I16} (1986Wa35), 5.36 {I7} (1983Ji01), 5.87 {I40}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 4.95 {I40} (1980Ro22), 5.29 {I19} (1980Sc07,1983De11),
182W 5cG 5.43 {I18} (1977Ge12), 5.28 {I40} (1972Ga23), 4.90 {I29} (1971Ml01),
182W 6cG 5.2 {I5} (1969Sa25), 5.47 {I28} (1965Ed01), 5.21 {I28} (1964Da15);
182W 7cG uncertainty increased to 0.4 in 1986Wa35. LWM gives 5.30 {I9} with
182W 8cG reduced |h{+2}=3.1. Other: 6.15 {I14} (1974La15) for mixed 113|g+116|g
182W cG Absolute intensity=1.839 {I15} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: from 0.36 {I2} from A{-2}=-0.324 {I21} (1983Ri05) and
182W 2cG 0.36 {I1} from subshell
182W 2cG ratios in 1972He10. Others: +0.31 {I2} (1972Kr05), +0.31 {I5}
182W xcG (1975Qu01)
182W dG MR: note that negative sign is a misprint in table III of
182W 2DG 1972Kr05
182W cG
182W cG {B116.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM, LWM average of 1.230 {I22} (1992Ch26), 1.27 {I2}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 1.33 {I3} (1992Su09), 1.28 {I6} (1990Ja02), 1.26 {I2} (1990Me15), 1.26
182W 3cG {I3} (1983Ji01), 1.14 {I8} (1981Is08), 1.18 {I18} (1980Ro22), 1.26
182W 4cG {I5} (1980Sc07), 1.26 {I4} (1977Ge12), 1.27 {I13} (1972Ga23), 1.00
182W 5cG {I8} (1971Ml01), 1.2 {I2} (1969Sa25), 1.27 {I8} (1965Ed01), 1.31 {I11}
182W xcG (1964Da15)
182W cG Absolute intensity=0.445 {I15} (1980Sc07)
182W cG
182W cG {B152.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 19.60 {I11} (1998Mi17), 20.40 {I26}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 19.81 {I22} (1992Ke02), 20.94 {I24} (1992Su09), 19.86 {I17} (1990Ja02),
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 21.19 {I39} (1986Wa35), 19.94 {I19} (1983Ji01), 19.59 {I80}
182W 4cG 19.95 {I19} (1980Ro22), 19.69 {I28} (1980Sc07), 20.5 {I6} (1977Ge12),
182W 5cG 18.7 {I6} (1974La15),19.3 {I14} (1972Ga23), 20.5 {I5} (1971Ja21), 19.7
182W 6cG {I13} (1971Ml01), 21.3 {I10} (1970Wh03), 19.5 {I20} (1969Sa25), 20.5
182W 7cG {I8} (1965Ed01), 18.1 {I7} (1964Da15); uncertainties increased to 0.4
182W 8cG in 1992Su09 and 0.5 in (1964Da15); LWM gives 19.92 {I32} with reduced
182W 9cG |h{+2}=3.2. Other: 23.15 {I50} (1981Is08) omitted as an outlier
182W cG Absolute intensity=6.92 {I2} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: -0.22 {I11} (1992Ch26), -0.023 {I4} (1983Ri05), 0.035
182W 2cG {I53} (1980Sp01 in {+182}Re decay); +0.014 {I13} (1975Qu01); all from
182W 2cG |g(|q) or |g|g(|q).
182W 3cG Subshell ratios in ce data (1967Ni03) give pure E1 consistent with
182W 4cG RUL(M2)=1 suggests |d<0.006, thus the evaluators assign pure E1
182W cG (152|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.392 {I6}, Pol=-0.33 {I3} (1983Ri05).
182W cG (152|g)[892|g](229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.14 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.8 {I6}
182W xcG (1992Ch26);
182W cG
182W cG {B156.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 7.57 {I5} (1998Mi17), 7.54 {I10}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 7.51 {I8}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 7.89 {I16} (1992Su09), 7.59 {I12} (1990Ja02), 7.59 {I10}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 7.26 {I18} (1986Wa35), 7.60 {I8} (1983Ji01), 7.55 {I80}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 7.43 {I40} (1980Ro22), 7.46 {I12} (1980Sc07), 7.77 {I24}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 7.78 {I20} (1974La15), 7.13 {I48} (1972Ga23), 7.6 {I2}
182W 6cG (1971Ja21), 7.5 {I7} (1971Ml01), 8.07 {I4} (1970Wh03), 7.5 {I8}
182W 7cG (1969Sa25), 8.04 {I36} (1965Ed01), 6.79 {I37} (1964Da15); uncertainty
182W 8cG increased to 0.18 in 1970Wh03. LWM gives 7.56 {I52} with reduced
182W xcG |h{+2}=6.5.
182W cG Absolute intensity=2.672 {I10} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d(M2/E1)=-0.053 {I4} from A{-2}=+0.411 {I7}, Pol=-0.36 {I9}
182W 2cG (1983Ri05); -0.08 {I5} (1992Ch26) from (156|g)[1002|g](229|g)(|q):
182W 3cG A{-2}=-0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I2} (1992Ch26); +0.06 {I+3-6}
182W 4cG (1981Ka22) from |g|g(|q), +0.003 {I16} (1980Sp01), -0.13 {I19}
182W 5cG (1975Qu01), pure E1 (1967Ni03, 1971Ga37 from subshell ce data).
182W 6cG RUL(M2)=1 implies |d<0.005, thus the evaluators assign E1.
182W cG
182W cG {B179.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 8.77 {I5} (1998Mi17), 8.93 {I12}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 8.81 {I9}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 9.04 {I18} (1992Su09), 8.83 {I8} (1990Ja02), 8.82 {I10}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 8.85 {I24} (1986Wa35), 8.84 {I10} (1983Ji01), 9.11 {I70}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 8.88 {I66} (1980Ro22), 8.75 {I11} (1980Sc07), 9.10 {I30}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 8.57 {I25} (1974La15), 8.7 {I6} (1972Ga23), 8.8 {I3}
182W 6cG (1971Ja21), 8.7 {I5} (1971Ml01), 9.57 {I5} (1970Wh03), 8.7 {I9}
182W 7cG (1969Sa25), 9.21 {I40} (1965Ed01), 9.30 {I47} (1964Da15); uncertainty
182W 8cG increased to 0.3 in 1970Wh03. LWM gives 9.0 {I6} with reduced
182W xcG |h{+2}=9.3
182W cG Absolute intensity=3.098 {I11} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: unweighted average of +2.2 {I2} (1992Ch26), +2.1 {I+3-2}
182W 2cG (1983Ri05),
182W 2cG +1.3 {I5} (1980Sp01), +0.9 {I4} (1975Qu01), +0.92 {I+13-7} (1972Kr05),
182W 3cG +0.90m +40-23 (1972He10), 0.7 {I1} (1967Ni03). Weighted average is 1.0
182W 4cG {I2} but with reduced |h{+2}=10.
182W cG A{-2}=-0.706 {I19}, Pol=+0.17 {I10} (1983Ri05); +0.56 to +1.3
182W 2cG (1975Qu01)
182W cG (179|g)[1044|g](229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.30
182W 2cG {I2} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B198.3|g}:
182W cG I|g: LWM, NRM average of 4.150 {I24} (1998Mi17), 4.19 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 4.12 {I6} (1992Ke02), 4.21 {I10} (1992Su09), 4.12 {I5} (1990Ja02),
182W 3cG 4.19 {I9} (1990Me15), 4.14 {I7} (1986Wa35), 4.22 {I6} (1983Ji01), 4.2
182W 4cG {I2} (1981Is08), 4.13 {I28} (1980Ro22), 4.09 {I6} (1980Sc07), 4.31
182W 5cG {I14} (1977Ge12), 4.15 {I28} (1972Ga23), 4.2 {I2} (1971Ml01), 4.40
182W 6cG {I25} (1970Wh03), 4.3 {I4} (1969Sa25), 4.30 {I24} (1965Ed01), 4.19
182W 7cG {I28} (1964Da15). Other: 3.75 {I12} (1974La15) is omitted as an outlier
182W cG Absolute intensity=1.465 {I6} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.067 {I10} from A{-2}=-0.519 {I10}, Pol=-0.43
182W 2cG {I9} (1983Ri05),
182W 2cG but RUL(M3)=10 suggests |d|?0
182W cG
182W cG {B222.1|g}:
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 21.17 {I12} (1998Mi17), 21.90 {I27}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 21.43 {I23} (1992Ke02), 21.6 {I5} (1992Su09), 21.80 {I20} (1990Ja02),
182W 3cG 21.6 {I3} (1990Me15), 21.62 {I51} (1986Wa35), 21.61 {I20} (1983Ji01),
182W 4cG 21.3 {I8} (1981Is08), 21.75 {I56} (1980Ro22), 21.27 {I28} (1980Sc07),
182W 5cG 21.9 {I7} (1977Ge12), 21.26 {I62} (1974La15), 21.5 {I15} (1972Ga23),
182W 6cG 21.30 {I55} (1971Ja21), 21.5 {I12} (1971Ml01), 22.6 {I12} (1970Wh03),
182W 7cG 21.2 {I21} (1969Sa25), 22.6 {I9} (1965Ed01), 21.8 {I7} (1964Da15).
182W cG Absolute intensity=7.48 {I3} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: +0.007 {I5} (1972Kr05), +0.027 {I7} (1992Ch26), -0.12
182W 2cG {I18} (1975Qu01),
182W 2cG pure E1 from subshell data (1967Ni01), as also suggested by
182W 3cG RUL for M2.
182W cG A{-2}=+0.358 {I10}, Pol=-0.34 {I8} (1972Kr05)
182W cG (222|g)[1002|g](229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.026 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.052
182W 2cG {I3} (1992Ch26)
182W cG (222|g)(1002|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.27 {I8}, A{-4}=+0.33 {I11}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG (222|g)(1231|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.030 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.015 {I8}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26); A{-2}=-0.020 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.010 {I15} (1975Qu01)
182W cG
182W cG {B229.3|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM, LWM average of 10.20 {I6} (1998Mi17), 10.43 {I13}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 10.43 {I12} (1992Ke02), 10.5 {I2} (1992Su09), 10.38 {I11} (1990Ja02),
182W 2cG 10.39 {I18}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 10.24 {I22} (1986Wa35), 10.49 {I10} (1983Ji01), 10.24 {I60}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 10.39 {I34} (1980Ro22), 10.32 {I13} (1980Sc07), 10.6 {I3}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 10.3 {I7} (1972Ga23), 10.3 {I3} (1971Ja21), 10.3 {I7}
182W 6cG (1971Ml01), 10.9 {I5} (1970Wh03), 10.5 {I11} (1969Sa25), 11.1 {I5}
182W 7cG (1965Ed01), 9.6 {I5} (1964Da15). I|g=9.24 {I26} (1974La15) is an
182W 8cG outlier thus omitted from the averaging procedure
182W cG Absolute intensity=3.601 {I13} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.007 {I7} from A{-2}=-0.508 {I7}, Pol=-0.27 {I12}
182W 2cG (1983Ri05)
182W cG
182W cG {B264.1|g}:
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 10.13 {I6} (1998Mi17), 10.37 {I15}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 10.43 {I14} (1992Ke02), 10.26 {I22} (1992Su09), 10.14 {I9} (1990Ja02),
182W 3cG 10.26 {I18} (1990Me15), 9.91 {I80} (1986Wa35), 10.37 {I7} (1983Ji01),
182W 4cG 9.98 {I50} (1981Is08), 10.36 {I52} (1980Ro22), 10.26 {I16} (1980Sc07),
182W 5cG 10.5 {I3} (1977Ge12), 10.4 {I7} (1972Ga23), 10.1 {I3} (1971Ja21), 10.0
182W 6cG {I6} (1971Ml01), 10.6 {I4} (1970Wh03), 10.3 {I10} (1969Sa25), 10.8
182W 7cG {I5} (1965Ed01), 9.9 {I7} (1964Da15). Other: 9.46 {I29} (1974La15) is
182W xcG omitted as an outlier
182W cG Absolute intensity=3.579 {I13} (1998Mi17)
182W cG Pol=-0.33 {I14} (1983Ri05)
182W cG
182W cG {B351.0|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 351.0 {I2} (1992Su09), 351.023 {I85}
182W 2cG (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 351.03 {I10} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: LWM average of 0.033 {I3} (1992Ch26, uncertainty of 3%
182W 2cG quoted by
182W 2cG the authors increased to 10% by the evaluators for this very weak
182W 3cG |g ray), 0.028 {I6} (1992Ke02), 0.3 {I1} (1992Su09), 0.034 {I8}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 0.033 {I19} (1983Ji01)
182W cG
182W cG {B829.9|g}:
182W cG E|g: from 1992Su09
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.039 {I8} (1992Ch26), 0.05 {I2}
182W 2cG (1992Su09),
182W 2cG 0.038 {I15} (1983Ji01)
182W cG
182W cG {B891.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 891.59 {I9} (1992Su09), 891.73 {I18}
182W 2cG (1990Ja02),
182W 2cG 891.92 {I13} (1969Wh03). Level-energy difference=891.97
182W cG I|g: NRM, LWM average of 0.160 {I10} (1992Ch26), 0.174 {I22}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 0.20 {I6} (1992Su09), 0.15 {I4} (1990Ja02), 0.16 {I5} (1983Ji01), 0.21
182W 4cG {I5} (1981Is08), 0.164 {I19} (1976He18), 0.15 {I2} (1970Wh03), 0.20
182W 5cG {I7} (1969Sa25). Others: <0.3 (1972Ga23), |?0.3 (1966Dz01)
182W cG
182W cG {B928.0|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 928.08 {I4} (1992Su09), 927.983
182W 2cG {I42} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 927.90 {I7} (1990Ja02), 927.96 {I11} (1989Ka20), 927.78 {I10}
182W 3cG (1974La15), 927.99 {I7} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: weighted average (LWM, NRM give the same result)
182W 2cG of 1.720 {I24} (1992Ch26), 1.75 {I7} (1992Ke02), 1.72 {I8} (1992Su09),
182W 3cG 1.77 {I6} (1990Ja02), 1.73 {I3} (1990Me15), 1.76 {I4} (1983Ji01), 1.64
182W 4cG {I10} (1981Is08), 1.53 {I45} (1980Ro22), 1.78 {I3} (1976He18), 1.75
182W 5cG {I20} (1972Ga23), 1.5 {I3} (1971Ml01), 1.79 {I9} (1970Wh03), 1.6 {I2}
182W 6cG (1969Sa25), 1.74 {I26} (1966Dz01). Other: 2.10 {I8} (1974La15) is
182W xcG omitted as outlier.
182W cG (928|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.18 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I1}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I14} (1992Ch26)
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I2} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B959.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 959.83 {I7} (1992Su09), 959.722
182W 2cG {I42} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 959.69 {I7} (1990Ja02), 959.71 {I8} (1989Ka20), 959.60 {I10}
182W 3cG (1974La15), 959.74 {I7} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: weighted average (also LWM and NRM) of 0.970 {I21}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG 0.99 {I8} (1992Ke02), 0.99 {I8} (1992Su09), 1.01 {I3} (1990Ja02), 0.98
182W 3cG {I3} (1990Me15), 0.98 {I5} (1983Ji01), 0.87 {I8} (1981Is08), 0.92
182W 4cG {I47} (1980Ro22), 1.00 {I2} (1976He18), 1.12 {I6} (1974La15), 0.95
182W 5cG {I11} (1972Ga23), 1.0 {I1} (1971Ml01), 1.02 {I6} (1970Wh03), 1.3 {I2}
182W xcG (1969Sa25), 0.94 {I24} (1966Dz01)
182W cG |d: -4.6 {I+36-}|@ (1992Ch26)
182W cG (960|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.31 {I14}, A{-4}=-0.46 {I20}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG $|a(K)exp=0.0095 {I6}; |a(L)exp=0.0019 {I2} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1001.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1001.79 {I4} (1992Su09), 1001.696
182W 2cG {I18} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 1001.67 {I12} (1990Ja02), 1001.66 {I6} (1989Ka20), 1001.62 {I10}
182W 3cG (1974La15), 1001.68 {I7} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 5.86 {I10} (1992Ch26), 5.89 {I12}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 5.87 {I13}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 6.01 {I5} (1990Ja02), 5.87 {I6} (1990Me15), 5.89 {I34}
182W 3cG (1986Wa35), 5.85 {I10} (1983Ji01), 5.36 {I11} (1981Is08), 5.99 {I35}
182W 4cG (1980Ro22), 5.90 {I9} (1976He18), 6.43 {I11} (1974La15), 5.66 {I40}
182W 5cG (1972Ga23), 5.4 {I10} (1971Ml01), 5.98 {I30} (1970Wh03), 5.6 {I6}
182W 6cG (1969Sa25), 5.4 {I3} (1966Dz01), 7.9 {I25} (1966Ko12); uncertainties
182W 7cG increased to 0.21 in 1981Is08 and 0.19 in 1974La15. LWM gives 5.91
182W xcG {I10} with reduced |h{+2}=3.6
182W cG |d: from 1972Kr05. Others: -8.2 {I+22-42} (1992Ch26), -30
182W 2cG {I+18-54} (1983Ri05)
182W cG A{-2}=+0.26 {I3}, Pol=+0.58 {I23} (1983Ri05)
182W cG (1002|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.10 {I4}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0034 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00049 {I4}, |a(M)exp +
182W xcG |a(N)exp=0.00026 {I3} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1035.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: average of 1035.8 {I6} (1976Kl09) and 1035.6 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Su09). This |g not reported in any other study
182W cG I|g: average of 0.017 {I6} (1992Su09) and 0.021 {I6}
182W 2cG (1976Kl09), the
182W 2cG latter deduced by the evaluators from authors' ce(K) data
182W cG
182W cG {B1044.4|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1044.47 {I11} (1992Su09), 1044.39
182W 2cG {I9} (1990Ja02),
182W 2cG 1044.40 {I7} (1989Ka20), 1044.43 {I9} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.660 {I21} (1992Ch26), 0.72 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 0.68 {I5} (1992Su09), 0.70 {I8} (1990Ja02), 0.72 {I7} (1983Ji01), 0.58
182W 3cG {I10} (1981Is08), 0.679 {I16} (1976He18), 0.69 {I10} (1972Ga23), 0.6
182W 4cG {I1} (1971Ml01), 0.69 {I8} (1970Wh03), 0.8 {I1} (1969Sa25), 1.2 {I2}
182W 5cG (1966Dz01). Other: <1 (1966Ko12)
182W cG |d: from Adopted Gammas. Other: +0.4 {I3} (1972Kr05)
182W cG Mult: E3 admixture is possible, |d(E3/E1)=-0.3 {I2}
182W xcG (1972Kr05)
182W cG (1044|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.16 {I8}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I3} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1113.4|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1113.4 {I1} (1992Su09), 1113.414
182W 2cG {I18} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 1113.50 {I12} (1990Ja02), 1113.38 {I7} (1989Ka20), 1113.36 {I20}
182W 3cG (1974La15), 1113.38 {I10} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 1.240 {I22} (1992Ch26), 1.19 {I7}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 1.08 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 1.35 {I15} (1990Ja02), 1.32 {I3} (1990Me15), 1.30 {I3}
182W 3cG (1983Ji01), 1.18 {I7} (1980Ro22), 1.28 {I2} (1976He18), 1.11 {I7}
182W 4cG (1974La15), 1.44 {I20} (1972Ga23), 1.13 {I10} (1970Wh03), 1.2 {I2}
182W 5cG (1969Sa25); uncertainty increased to 0.07 in 1992Su09. LWM gives 1.261
182W 6cG {I24} with reduced |h{+2}=4.4. Other: 2.21 {I20} (1981Is08) omitted as
182W xcG an outlier
182W cG Mult, |d: from A{-2}=+0.127 {I13} (1983Ri05). Other: +1.1
182W 2cG {I2} (1992Ch26).
182W 2cG E0 admixture is measured and discussed in 1975We22 from ce
182W 3cG and |g(ce)(|q) data with q(E0/E2)=0.41 {I9}, X(E0/E2)=0.011 {I5}
182W cG (1113|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.12 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I3}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1121.3|g}:
182W cG I|g: 100.0 for the intensity of this |g ray is used as a
182W 2cG reference
182W 2cG for intensities of other |g rays.
182W cG Absolute intensity=35.32 {I12} (1998Mi17), 35.30 {I32}
182W 2cG (1980Sc07)
182W cG |d: from A{-2}=+0.088 {I6}, Pol=+0.03 {I4} (1983Ri05).
182W 2cG Others: +21 {I+19-8}
182W 2cG (1972Kr05), +24 {I+21-8} (1972He10), +12 {I+2-1} (1975Qu01).
182W 3cG E0 admixture is measured and discussed in 1975We22 from ce
182W 4cG and (ce)(ce)(|q) data with q(E0/E2)=0.16 {I9}, X(E0/E2)=0.0016 {I11},
182W 5cG |r(magnitude)=0.019 {I11}. See also 1990Ka35.
182W 6cG |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.00029
182W cG $|a(K)exp=0.0030 {I1}, |a(L)exp=0.00054 {I2} (1992Ch26),
182W 2cG |a(K)exp=0.00303 {I10} (1975We22)
182W cG
182W cG {B1135.9} E0 transition:
182W cG This transition reported in |p|62 magnetic spectrograph
182W 2cG study by 1976Kl09. Not reported by 1976He18 in their ce data
182W cG Intensity: deduced from I(ce(K))=0.000134 {I33} in 1976Kl09
182W cG
182W cG {B1157.3|g}:
182W cG E|g: from level-energy difference, with recoil removed.
182W 2cG Weighted
182W 2cG average of 1157.52 {I6} (1992Su09), 1157.505 {I15} (1990Me15), 1157.53
182W 3cG {I7} (1990Ja02), 1157.52 {I20} (1974La15) and 1157.58 {I8} (1969Wh03)
182W 4cG is 1157.510 {I15}, which fits poorly in the level scheme, differing by
182W 5cG 0.2 keV from the level-energy difference. The poor fit is due to the
182W 6cG presence of a weak component at 1158.1 keV reported in 1992Su09
182W 7cG deexciting 1487 level. For this reason, the evaluators have not used
182W 8cG this |g in the least-squares fitting procedure and have adopted the
182W 9cG value from level-energy difference, deduced uncertainty=0.0011 keV
182W cG I|g: deduced from total intensity of 1157+1158 doublet=
182W 2cG 2.896 {I14} and
182W 2cG the intensity of 0.82 {I10} for the weaker 1158 |g ray; the former
182W 2cG value
182W 3cG is determined from the weighted average (same result for LWM, NRM)
182W 4cG of 2.930 {I22} (1998Mi17), 2.83 {I5} (1992Ch26), 2.87 {I5} (1992Ke02),
182W 5cG 2.83 {I9} (1992Su09), 2.71 {I20} (1990Ja02), 2.92 {I3} (1990Me15),
182W 6cG 2.91 {I34} (1986Wa35), 2.88 {I32} (1983Ji01), 2.65 {I20} (1981Is08),
182W 7cG 2.85 {I5} (1977Ge12), 2.96 {I9} (1974La15), 2.90 {I20} (1972Ga23), 2.6
182W 8cG {I2} (1971Ml01), 2.83 {I7} (1970Wh03), 2.76 {I34} (1969Sa25), 4.1
182W 9cG {I12} (1966Dz01), 2.67 {I15} (1966Ko12). From singles spectra,
182W AcG intensity of 1157|g: 2.01 {I7} (1992Su09), 1.66 {I24} (1983Ji01), 1.84
182W BcG {I35} (1970Wh03), 2.0 {I3} (1968Sa25). Ice(1157K)/Ice(1221K)=6.65
182W CcG {I6}/100 (1976He18) (large Ice(K), factor of |?2.2 higher if 1157 is
182W DcG M1+E2, gives clear evidence of E0 admixture, 1.84 {I35} (1970Wh03)
182W cG Absolute intensity=1.036 {I6} for 1157+1158 (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: from Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I4} (1992Ch26)
182W 2cG disagrees with M1
182W 2cG or any mixture of M1+E2, gives evidence of E0 admixture.
182W 3cG Others: -7.6 {I+48-}|@ (1972Kr05), -0.65 to -1.6 (1972He10).
182W 4cG E0 admixture is measured and discussed in 1975We22 from ce
182W 5cG and (ce)(ce)(|q) data with q(E0/E2)=1.13 {I13}, X(E0/E2)=0.090 {I24},
182W 6cG | r(magnitude)=0.049 {I6}. Ice(1157K)/Ice(1221K)=6.56 {I6}/100
182W 7cG (1976He18) also clearly indicates presence of E0 component of 0.5% {I1}
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I4} (1992Ch26)
182W cG |a: from |a(K)exp multiplied by a factor of 1.2 to account
182W 2cG for other shells
182W cG
182W cG {B1158.1|g}:
182W cG E|g: from 1992Su09. Others: 1983Ji01, 1976He18 (as K-
182W 2cG conversion
182W 2cG line), 1969Sa25 (|g|g coin)
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.76 {I16} (|g|g coin,1969Sa25).
182W 2cG 0.99 {I28}
182W 2cG (singles |g,1970Wh03), 0.82 {I5} (singles |g,1992Su09); uncertainty
182W 3cG increased to 0.10 in 1992Su09.
182W 4cG Others: 1.22 {I21} (1983Ji01, singles |g), 1.85 {I35} (deduced by the
182W 5cG evaluators from Ice(1158K)/Ice(1223K)=1.10 {I21}/100 (1976He18));
182W 6cG values are inconsistent, due possibly to poor splitting of the
182W 7cG 1157+1158 doublet and large contribution of E0 component in Ice(K)
182W cG |d: -0.01 {I+20-10} (1992Ch26)
182W cG (1158|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.20 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I5}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1180.8|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1180.5 {I5} (1992Su09), 1180.88
182W 2cG {I14} (1990Ja02)
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.250 {I10} (1992Ch26), 0.22 {I6}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 0.23 {I4} (1992Su09), 0.23 {I9} (1990Ja02), 0.21 {I4} (1983Ji01),
182W 3cG 0.249 {I15} (1976He18), 0.28 {I4} (1972Ga23), 0.25 {I4} (1969Sa25).
182W 4cG Other: 0.56 {I7} (1981Is08) is omitted as an outlier
182W cG
182W cG {B1189.0|g}:
182W cG I|g: weighted average (also LWM and NRM) of 46.70 {I24}
182W 2cG (1998Mi17),
182W 2cG 46.6 {I8} (1992Ch26), 47.0 {I6} (1992Ke02), 46.3 {I19} (1992Su09),
182W 3cG 47.37 {I29} (1990Ja02), 47.1 {I8} (1990Me15), 47.02 {I48} (1986Wa35),
182W 4cG 46.40 {I20} (1983Ji01), 48.8 {I17} (1981Is08), 47.61 {I53} (1980Ro22),
182W 5cG 46.59 {I47} (1980Sc07), 46.5 {I7} (1977Ge12), 46.1 {I15} (1974La15),
182W 6cG 46.7 {I23} (1972Ga23), 46.5 {I7} (1971Ja21), 47.2 {I15} (1971Ml01),
182W 7cG 47.4 {I7} (1970Wh03), 46.3 {I33} (1969Sa25), 44.3 {I15} (1966Dz01),
182W xcG 48.1 {I20} (1966Ko12)
182W cG Absolute intensity=16.49 {I6} {I6} (1998Mi17), 16.7 {I2}
182W 2cG (1997Ka47)
182W cG Mult, |a: 59% {I4} E1, 14% {I1} M2 and 27% {I3} E3.
182W 2cG Conversion coefficient deduced for this admixture,
182W 3cG it agrees well with measured values from 1992Ch26
182W cG |d: from weighted averages of |d(M2/E1)=+0.44 {I6},
182W 2cG |d(E3/E1)= -0.69 {I10}
182W 2cG from A{-2}=-0.884 {I19}, Pol=+0.13 {I3} (1983Ri05); |d(M2/E1)=+0.49
182W 3cG {I3}, |d(E3/E1)=-0.64 {I5} (1972Kr05); |d(M2/E1)=0.49 {I3},
182W 4cG |d(E3/E1)=0.72 {I7} (1972He10) from |a(K)exp ratios of 1189, 1121 and
182W 5cG 1221 |g rays and |g|g(|q)
182W cG |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.0022
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00061 {I3},
182W 2cG |a(M+...)exp|a(N)exp=0.00014 {I1} (1992Ch26); |a(K)exp=0.00418 {I14}
182W xcG (1975We22)
182W cG
182W cG {B1221.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: deduced from total intensity of 1221+1223 doublet=
182W 2cG 77.94 {I20} and
182W 2cG the intensity of 0.67 {I8} for the weaker 1223 |g ray; the former value
182W 3cG is determined from the weighted average (same result in LWM, NRM)
182W 4cG of 78.5 {I5} (1998Mi17), 78.3 {I11} (1992Ch26), 78.0 {I10} (1992Ke02),
182W 5cG 76.8 {I15} (1992Su09), 78.03 {I36} (1990Ja02), 78.1 {I13} (1990Me15),
182W 6cG 77.3 {I13} (1986Wa35), 77.3 {I6} (1983Ji01), 77.9 {I27} (1981Is08),
182W 7cG 78.14 {I93} (1980Ro22), 76.96 {I76} (1980Sc07), 77.8 {I11} (1977Ge12),
182W 8cG 78.4 {I12} (1974La15), 80.3 {I41} (1972Ga23), 77.3 {I12} (1971Ja21),
182W 9cG 78.0 {I30} (1971Ml01), 79.3 {I12} (1970Wh03), 77.9 {I54} (1969Sa25),
182W AcG 77 {I6} (1966Dz01). Other: 85.1 {I31} (1966Ko12) omitted as outlier.
182W BcG From singles spectra intensity of 1221|g: 76.2 {I15} (1992Su09), 77.8
182W CcG {I15} (1990Me15), 76.8 {I6} (1983Ji01), 77.3 {I54} (1969Sa25); all
182W DcG these are consistent with the adopted value of 77.34 {I22}.
182W cG Absolute intensity=27.71 {I9} for 1221+1223 (1998Mi17),
182W 2cG 26.5 {I3} (1997Ka47)
182W cG Pol=-0.34 {I9} (1983Ri05). |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.0028
182W cG |a(K)=0.0025 used for normalization of ce data (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1223.6|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average (NRM method) of 1223.7 {I1} (1992Su09),
182W 2cG 1223.2 {I1}
182W 2cG (1990Me15), 1224.0 {I4} (1990Ja02), 1223.2 {I5} (1969Sa25); |D(E|g)
182W 3cG adjusted to 0.2 keV in 1990Me15. LWM weighted average is 1223.46 {I26}
182W 4cG with reduced |h{+2}=4.7. Level-energy difference=1223.79
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.58 {I10} (1992Su09), 0.53 {I24}
182W 2cG (1983Ji01),
182W 2cG 0.75 {I7} (deduced by the evaluators from K-conversion intensities of
182W 3cG 1223|g and 1221|g measured in 1976He18), 0.6 {I1} (|g|g coin,
182W 4cG 1969Sa25). Other: 0.3 {I1} (1990Me15) omitted as outlier
182W cG Mult,|d: from |g|g(|q) (1992Ch26). Other: %E1>80% (or |d<0.5
182W 2cG from
182W 2cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I4} and assuming equal M2 and E3 admixtures (ce data,
182W 3cG 1976He18, using I|g=0.8 from 19). E3 admixture cannot be ruled out.
182W cG (1223|g)(229|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.23 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I9}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1231.0|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 33.18 {I19} (1998Mi17), 32.8 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 33.17 {I37}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 32.2 {I7} (1992Su09), 33.85 {I22} (1990Ja02), 33.1 {I5}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 33.42 {I31} (1986Wa35), 32.72 {I14} (1983Ji01), 32.3 {I11}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 32.32 {I56} (1980Ro22), 32.81 {I32} (1980Sc07), 32.96 {I47}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 32.60 {I52} (1974La15), 34.5 {I25} (1972Ga23), 32.8 {I5}
182W 6cG (1971Ja21), 32.3 {I10} (1971Ml01), 33.4 {I5} (1970Wh03), 32.7 {I23}
182W 7cG (1969Sa25), 26 {I5} (1966Dz01), 28.6 {I11} (1966Ko12); uncertainties
182W 8cG increased to 0.4 in 1990Ja02 and 1.6 in 1966Ko12. LWM gives 32.4 {I4}
182W 9cG with reduced |h{+2}=2.4
182W cG Absolute intensity=11.72 {I4} (1998Mi17)
182W cG |d: from 1983Ri05. Others: +11 {I+6-3} (1992Ch26), -60
182W 2cG {I+20-100} (1972Kr05), -32 {I+15-142} (1975Qu01)
182W cG A{-2}=-0.067 {I12}, Pol=-0.24 {I12} (1983Ri05)
182W cG |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.0024
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I1}, |a(M)exp + |a(N)exp=0.000085 {I7}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1257.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: weighted average (also LWM and NRM) of 4.320 {I24}
182W 2cG (1998Mi17),
182W 2cG 4.31 {I7} (1992Ch26), 4.34 {I7} (1992Ke02), 4.22 {I9} (1992Su09), 4.35
182W 3cG {I6} (1990Ja02), 4.36 {I8} (1990Me15), 4.30 {I16} (1986Wa35), 4.276
182W 4cG {I24} (1983Ji01), 4.07 {I30} (1981Is08), 4.33 {I15} (1980Ro22), 4.25
182W 5cG {I2} (1980Sc07), 4.26 {I6} (1977Ge12), 4.31 {I8} (1974La15), 4.46
182W 6cG {I45} (1972Ga23), 4.27 {I14} (1971Ml01), 4.33 {I7} (1970Wh03), 4.3
182W 7cG {I3} (1969Sa25), 3.8 {I3} (1966Dz01), 3.91 {I15} (1966Ko12)
182W cG Absolute intensity=1.524 {I7} (1998Mi17)
182W cG Pol=-0.36 {I9} (1983Ri05). |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.008
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.00032 {I2}, |a(M)exp + |a(N)exp=0.00012 {I2}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1273.7|g}:
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 1.85 {I3} (1992Ch26), 1.86 {I3}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 1.84 {I5}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 1.90 {I4} (1990Ja02), 1.95 {I3} (1990Me15), 1.73 {I12}
182W 3cG (1986Wa35), 1.871 {I13} (1983Ji01), 1.67 {I15} (1981Is08), 1.66 {I18}
182W 4cG (1980Ro22), 1.86 {I3} (1977Ge12), 1.83 {I5} (1974La15), 1.96 {I19}
182W 5cG (1972Ga23), 1.92 {I8} (1971Ml01), 1.90 {I4} (1970Wh03), 1.80 {I13}
182W 6cG (1969Sa25), 1.5 {I3} (1966Dz01), 1.64 {I15} (1966Ko12)
182W cG Mult, |a: 81% {I5} E1, 12% {I4} M2 and 7% {I2} E3.
182W 2cG Conversion coefficient deduced for this admixture,
182W 3cG it agrees well with measured values from 1992Ch26
182W cG |d: from A{-2}=-0.37 {I6}, Pol=-0.39 {I5} (1983Ri05). Other:
182W 2cG |d(M2/E1)=+0.42 {I4} (1972Kr05), only M2/E1 mixing given
182W cG |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.014
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00047 {I4} (1992Ch26);
182W xcG |a(K)exp=0.00291 {I5}
182W cG
182W cG {B1289.1|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 3.940 {I23} (1998Mi17), 3.91 {I6}
182W 2cG (1992Ch26), 4.03 {I7}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 3.80 {I8} (1992Su09), 3.90 {I5} (1990Ja02), 4.29 {I8}
182W 3cG (1990Me15), 4.17 {I30} (1986Wa35), 3.80 {I3} (1983Ji01), 3.65 {I20}
182W 4cG (1981Is08), 4.06 {I22} (1980Ro22), 3.86 {I2} (1980Sc07), 3.86 {I6}
182W 5cG (1977Ge12), 3.96 {I8} (1974La15), 4.10 {I40} (1972Ga23), 4.06 {I14}
182W 6cG (1971Ml01), 4.04 {I7} (1970Wh03), 3.8 {I3} (1969Sa25), 3.7 {I2}
182W 7cG (1966Dz01), 3.67 {I15} (1966Ko12). Uncertainties increased to 0.14 in
182W 8cG 1990Me15 and 0.05 in 1983Ji01. LWM gives 3.895 {I35} with reduced
182W xcG |h{+2}=3.3
182W cG Absolute intensity=1.393 {I7} (1998Mi17)
182W cG Pol=+0.39 {I12} (1983Ri05). |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.0009
182W cG |a(L)exp=0.0019 {I2}, |a(M+...)exp|a(N)exp=0.00036 {I3}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1342.7|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1342.80 {I7} (1992Su09), 1342.731
182W 2cG {I15} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 1342.73 {I6} (1990Ja02), 1342.70 {I7} (1989Ka20), 1342.60 {I10}
182W 3cG (1974La15), 1342.72 {I6} (1969Wh03)
182W cG I|g: weighted average of 0.720 {I12} (1992Ch26), 0.748 {I21}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02),
182W 2cG 0.69 {I3} (1992Su09), 0.76 {I4} (1990Ja02), 0.74 {I1} (1990Me15),
182W 3cG 0.723 {I7} (1983Ji01), 0.66 {I8} (1981Is08), 0.718 {I12} (1977Ge12),
182W 4cG 0.74 {I3} (1974La15), 0.80 {I9} (1972Ga23), 0.75 {I3} (1971Ml01), 0.75
182W 5cG {I2} (1970Wh03), 0.7 {I1} (1969Sa25), 0.60 {I9} (1966Dz01), 0.79 {I5}
182W xcG (1966Ko12)
182W cG |d(M3/E2)=-0.11 {I+4-20} from A{-2}=-0.33 {I12}, Pol=-0.57
182W 2cG {I18} (1983Ri05)
182W 2cG is inconsistent with RUL(M3)=10, which suggests that |d should
182W 3cG be near zero. The evaluators assign pure E2 as in Adopted Gammas.
182W DG ICE(K)+(ICE(L) FOR 1289G)=2.48 13; ICE(L)=0.074 13;
182W 2DG ICE(M+N)+(ICE(K) FOR 1410G)=0.094 20 (1992Ch26)
182W cG |a(pair)/|a(K)=0.013
182W cG |a(L)exp=0.00030 {I6}, |a(M+...)exp|a(N)exp=0.00009 {I3}
182W xcG (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1373.8|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 0.610 {I15} (1992Ch26), 0.628 {I13}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 0.55 {I2}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 0.65 {I2} (1990Ja02), 0.68 {I1} (1990Me15), 0.626 {I6}
182W 3cG (1983Ji01), 0.58 {I8} (1981Is08), 0.628 {I11} (1977Ge12), 0.65 {I3}
182W 4cG (1974La15), 0.70 {I8} (1972Ga23), 0.69 {I3} (1971Ml01), 0.66 {I2}
182W 5cG (1970Wh03), 0.6 {I1} (1969Sa25), 0.52 {I9} (1966Dz01), 0.70 {I14}
182W 6cG (1966Ko12); uncertainties increased to 0.02 in 1990Me15. LWM gives
182W xcG 0.634 {I8} with reduced |h{+2}=3.8
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00074 {I4} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1387.4|g}:
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 0.205 {I6} (1992Ch26), 0.220 {I11}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02) , 0.19 {I2}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 0.24 {I3} (1990Ja02), 0.27 {I1} (1990Me15), 0.204 {I4}
182W 3cG (1983Ji01), 0.20 {I5} (1981Is08), 0.202 {I7} (1977Ge12), 0.21 {I1}
182W 4cG (1974La15), 0.225 {I23} (1972Ga23), 0.24 {I2} (1971Ml01), 0.217 {I10}
182W 5cG (1970Wh03), 0.18 {I2} (1969Sa25), 0.25 {I6} (1966Dz01), 0.18 {I4}
182W 6cG (1966Ko12); uncertainty increased to 0.023 in 1990Me15. LWM average is
182W 7cG 0.211 {I7} with reduced |h{+2}=3.5
182W cG |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I3} (1992Ch26)
182W cG
182W cG {B1410.1|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1410.13 {I8} (1992Su09), 1410.15
182W 2cG {I11} (1990Ja02),
182W 2cG 1410.10 {I10} (1969Wh03). E|g=1411.077 {I45} is an outlier thus not
182W 3cG used in averaging. If it is 1410.077, then weighted average is 1410.10
182W xcG {I4}
182W cG I|g: LWM average of 0.109 {I4} (1992Ch26), 0.117 {I8}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 0.083 {I10}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 0.14 {I2} (1990Ja02), 0.117 {I4} (1990Me15), 0.111 {I5}
182W 3cG (1983Ji01), 0.10 {I4} (1981Is08), 0.112 {I6} (1977Ge12), 0.130 {I25}
182W 4cG (1972Ga23), 0.14 {I3} (1971Ml01), 0.117 {I8} (1970Wh03), 0.11 {I2}
182W 5cG (1969Sa25), 0.115 {I17} (1966Dz01), 0.13 {I6} (1966Ko12).
182W cG Ice(K)+(Ice(M+N) for 1343|g)=0.094 {I20} (1992Ch26).
182W 2cG |a(pair)/|a(K)|?0.026
182W cG
182W cG {B1453.1|g}:
182W cG E|g: weighted average of 1453.1 {I1} (1992Su09), 1453.125
182W 2cG {I62} (1990Me15),
182W 2cG 1453.22 {I14} (1990Ja02), 1453.05 {I11} (1969Wh03).
182W 3cG Level-energy difference=1453.112
182W cG I|g: NRM average of 0.083 {I3} (1992Ch26), 0.097 {I7}
182W 2cG (1992Ke02), 0.11 {I1}
182W 2cG (1992Su09), 0.11 {I2} (1990Ja02), 0.123 {I8} (1990Me15), 0.0872 {I24}
182W 3cG (1983Ji01), 0.10 {I4} (1981Is08), 0.079 {I3} (1977Ge12), 0.10 {I2}
182W 4cG (1972Ga23), 0.12 {I3} (1971Ml01), 0.123 {I10} (1970Wh03), 0.12 {I2}
182W 5cG (1969Sa25), 0.094 {I12} (1966Dz01), 0.14 {I6} (1966Ko12); uncertainty
182W 6cG increased to 0.014 in 1990Me15 and 1970Wh03. LWM average is 0.106
182W 7cG {I19} with reduced |h{+2}=4.3
182W cG Mult: |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4} (1992Ch26) suggests dominant E3
182W cG
182W cG ------------------------------------------------------------
182W cG |a(pair)/|a(K) are from 1966Ko12
182W cG Pol=coefficient of linear polarization measurement by
182W 2cG 1983Ri05
182W cG E$Values for 22 |g rays, as indicated, are recommended values from
182W 2cG 2000He14 evaluation and analysis, based on curved-crystal data for
182W 3cG low-energy (<270 keV) transitions, and from precise energy difference
182W 4cG measurements of closely spaced |g rays of other isotopes. Two others
182W 5cG are in table 4 of 2000He14 from curved-crystal data. Others are
182W 6cG from weighted averages of values from 1992Su09, 1990Ja02,
182W 7cG 1990Me15, 1989Ka20, 1974La15 and 1969Wh03 (also 1970Wh03).
182W cG E(Z)$Recommended value from 2000He14 (evaluation and analysis)
182W cG E(U),RI(U)$ The 121|g not seen, its energy is from level-energy
182W 2cG difference. Intensity is deduced (by evaluators) by requiring
182W 3cG intensity balance at 1136 level and assumed E2 multipolarity. It
182W 4cG is considered as an uncertain transition
182W cG RI$Average of available values from 1998Mi17, 1992Ch26, 1992Ke02,
182W 2cG 1992Su09, 1990Ja02, 1990Me15, 1986Wa35, 1983Ji01, 1981Is08, 1980Ro22,
182W 3cG 1980Sc07, 1977Ge12 (includes 1976He18), 1974La15, 1972Ga23, 1971Ja21,
182W 4cG 1971Ml01, 1970Wh03, 1969Sa25, 1966Dz01, 1966Ko12, 1965Ed01, 1964Da15.
182W 5cG AVETOOLS code is used for averaging procedure; this code combines
182W 6cG four methods: weighted average, limitation of statistical weights
182W 7cG (LWM), normalized residuals method (NRM) and Rajeval technique (RT).
182W 8cG Adopted value is from best reduced |h{+2} as compared to critical
182W 9cG value of |h{+2}, with as small adjustment (increase) of uncertainties
182W AcG in input values as possible. In most cases LWM and/or NRM values
182W BcG are adopted. Values in 1965Ed01 and 1964Da15 are normalized to 40.3
182W CcG for 100-keV |g ray. Values in 1976He18 are renormalized to 77.94 for
182W DcG 1221+1223 doublet.
182W cG M,MR$From ce data, |g(|q), and |g|g(|q) measurements
182W 2cG of 1967Ni03, 1983Ri05, 1972Kr05, 1961Ha23, 1963El02, 1971Ga37,
182W 3cG 1972He10, 1975Qu01, 1980Sp01 and 1992Ch26
182W cG MR(M)$Sign from |g|g(|q) measurements of 1983Ri05, 1972Kr05;
182W 2cG magnitude from these measurements and ce data.
182W cG M(B)$From pol |g|g(|q) measurement of 1983Ri05
182W CG CC$Theoretical values from BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07,
182W 2CG "Frozen Orbitals" approximation. If mixing ratio |d is not given, it
182W 3cG was assumed as 1.0 for E2/M1 and E3/M2 and 0.10 for others
182W cL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g data with the omission of 1157.5|g
182W 2cL due to its being a doublet. Normalized |h{+2} is 0.4
182W cL J$From Adopted Levels
182W cL T$ From Adopted levels, unless otherwise stated
182W cL T(A)$ From delayed coincidence techniques in {+182}Ta decay
182TA P 0.0 3- 114.74 D 12 1814.5 17
182TA cP J$3-,4- from (n,|g),E=0.002-3 keV and E=2 keV;
182TA2cP log| {Ift}=8.32 to 1289, 2- level in {+182}W rules out 4-.
182TA cP T$The following measured values (in days) have been used in the
182TA2cP different averaging procedures in the AVETOOLS computer code available
182TA3cP at ANU website to arrive at the recommended value:
182TA3cP 114.43 {I4} (1980Sc07,4|p ionization chamber), 114.740 {I24} (1973Vi13,
182TA4cP well-type NaI(Tl) detector, authors quoted uncertainty of 0.08 is
182TA5cP 3.3|s), 115.0 {I2} (1972Em01,4|p ionization chamber), 117.3 {I10}
182TA6cP (1967Wa29, differential ionization chamber), 118.4 {I5} (1958Sp17, GM
182TA7cP counter), 114.80 {I12} (1958Ke26), 115.05 {I25} (1957Wr37, single-ion
182TA8cP chamber, same group as 1972Em01 but different experimental setup
182TA9cP used), 111.2 {I5} (1952Ei12, single-ion chamber), 111 {I1} (1951Si25,
182TAAcP single-ion chamber), 117.5 {I18} (Meitner, Ann.Phys. 6, 113 (1948)),
182TABcP 117 {I3} (1947Se33), 117 {I3} (Zumstein et al., Phys.Rev. 63, 59
182TACcP (1943)). Others: 97 {I8} (Oldenberg: Phys Rev 53, 35 (1938), 200
182TADcP {I100} (Fomin and Houtermans: Physik Zeits d. Sowjetunion 9, 273
182TAEcP (1936). The above measurements present a discrepant set of values; the
182TAFcP weighted average or the LWM methods, both giving 114.62 {I12}, are
182TAGcP unacceptable with normalized |h{+2}=15.5. The normalized residuals
182TAHcP method (NRM) gives 114.74 {I5} with normalized |h{+2}=3.8, somewhat
182TAIcP larger than the critical |h{+2}; with the following uncertainties
182TAJcP adjusted: 0.04 to 0.12 in 1980Sc07, 0.5 to 1.4 in 1958Sp17 and
182TAKcP 1952Ei12, 1 to 1.4 in 1951Si25. The Rajeval (RT) method gives 114.744
182TALcP {I23} with |h{+2}=2.2, but with larger adjustments in the
182TAMcP uncertainties. Selection of the five most precise data points
182TANcP (1980Sc07,1973Vi13, 1972Em01,1958Ke26,1957Wr37) gives 114.739 {I23}
182TAOcP with |h{+2}=2.2 using the NRM method, with uncertainty adjustment from
182TAPcP 0.04 to 0.14 in 1980Sc07. Weighted average and the LWM method give
182TAQcP 114.62 {I12}, still suffer from high |h{+2} of 10.5. Thus the
182TARcP evaluators recommend value of 114.739 {I23} from NRM method used on
182TAScP five most precise data points, but with uncertainty increased to 0.1%,
182TATcP to account for any systematic uncertainties which may not have been
182TAUcP included in some of the precisely quoted measurements used in the
182TAxcP present analysis.
182TA cP QP$ From 2012Wa38
182W N 0.3524 8 0.3524 8 1 1
182W cN NR$ weighted average of I|g(absolute,1998Mi17)/I|g(relative,adopted
182W 2cN in this dataset) values of 16 strong |g rays. From summed transition
182W 3cN intensity=100 to the g.s., this factor is 0.353 {I4}. It also agrees
182W 4cN with 0.3530 {I32} deduced by 1980Sc07
182W PN 3
182W L 0.0 0+
182W L 100.10598 7 2+ 1.40 NS 2 A
182W cL T$weighted average of 1.27 ns {I10} (1955Su64,1954Su10), 1.55 ns {I11}
182W 2cL (1963Ba24), 1.26 ns {I4} (1963Fo02), 1.41 ns {I6} (1963Ko02), 1.47 ns
182W 3cL {I9} (1964Ro19), 1.4 ns {I1} (1964Be36), 1.39 ns {I3} (1965Do02), 1.37
182W 4cL ns {I3} (1965Me08), 1.45 ns {I4} (1966Bl08), 1.35 ns {I7} (1966Fu03),
182W 5cL 1.43 ns {I5} (1966Ra04), 1.48 ns {I3} (1970Ab14), 1.380 ns {I20}
182W 6cL (1971Ho14), 1.55 ns {I5} (1973GrXX), 1.38 ns {I3} (1983El02). See also
182W 7cL Adopted Levels, where 1.381 ns {I10} is recommended from all
182W 8cL independent measurements using a variety of techniques.
182W B 1713 3 0.058 6 13.03 5 D
182W S B EAV=625.31 72
182W cB IB$intensity balance in level scheme gives <1.5
182W G 100.10595 7 40.3 3 E2 3.89 ZC
182W S G KC=0.878 13$LC=2.28 4$MC=0.576 8
182W S G NC=0.1358 19$OC=0.0186 3$PC=7.08E-5 10
182W L 329.4268 6 4+ 62 PS 3
182W cL T$other: <0.20 ns (|g|g(t),1971Ho14)
182W B 1470 20 0.09610 12.57 5 D
182W S B EAV=529.12 71
182W cB IB$value of 0.096 {I10} is inconsistent with intensity balance of
182W 2cB -0.08 {I6} in level scheme
182W G 229.3207 6 10.34 4 E2 0.196 ZC
182W S G KC=0.1167 17$LC=0.0605 9$MC=0.01497 21
182W S G NC=0.00354 5$OC=0.000505 7$PC=9.50E-6 14
182W L 680.45 6 6+ 8.2 PS 9
182W G 351.02 6 0.0321 25 E2 0.0538
182W S G KC=0.0380 6$LC=0.01210 17$MC=0.00293 5
182W S G NC=0.000696 10$OC=0.0001027 15$PC=3.34E-6 5
182W L 1135.91 14 0+
182W cL E$ this level, proposed in 1976Kl09, cannot be populated directly by
182W 2cL |b decay due to highly forbidden |DJ=3 transition involved. Feeding by
182W 3cL |g rays from higher levels is not established.
182W G 1035.7 5 0.019 6 [E2] 0.00420
182W S G KC=0.00346 5$LC=0.000575 8$MC=0.0001317 19
182W S G NC=3.16E-5 5$OC=5.05E-6 7$PC=3.21E-7 5
182W G 1135.9 6 E0
182W cG TI$E0 intensity=0.00016 {I4}
182W L 1221.4001 10 2+ 0.434 PS 11
182W cL $This level could also feed 1136 level through an 85.5-keV transition,
182W 2cL but large B(E2)(W.u.) resulting from the deduced intensity makes
182W 3cL it improbable.
182W B 591 10 3.2 5 9.63 7
182W S B EAV=181.82 60
182W G 891.70 10 0.163 7 E2 0.00569
182W S G KC=0.00464 7$LC=0.000810 12$MC=0.000187 3
182W S G NC=4.47E-5 7$OC=7.10E-6 10$PC=4.31E-7 6
182W G 1121.290 3 100.0 E2+M1+E0 +30 +6-4 0.00360 ZC
182W F G FLAG=M
182W S G KC=0.00297 5$LC=0.000483 7$MC=0.0001104 16
182W S G NC=2.65E-5 4$OC=4.25E-6 6$PC=2.76E-7 4$IPC=4.73E-7 7
182W DG $EKC=0.0030 1, ELC=0.00054 2 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $EKC=0.00303 10 (1975We22)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=101 3 (INCLUDES SMALL CONTRIBUTION FROM ICE(K)
182W 2DG FOR 1113G); ICE(L)=18.5 7 (INCLUDES SMALL CONTRIBUTION FROM ICE(K)
182W 3DG FOR 1181G) (1992Ch26)
182W G 1221.395 3 77.27 22 E2 0.00305 Z
182W S G KC=0.00252 4$LC=0.000402 6$MC=9.15E-5 13
182W S G NC=2.20E-5 3$OC=3.53E-6 5$PC=2.34E-7 4$IPC=6.75E-6 10
182W DG $ ICE(K)=67 (INCLUDES SMALL CONTRIBUTION FROM ICE(K)
182W 2DG FOR 1224G); ICE(L)=12.1 5 (INCLUDES SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS FROM
182W 3DG ICE(L) FOR 1224G AND ICE(K) FOR 1274G); ICE(M+N)+(ICE(K) FOR 1289G
182W 4DG AND ICE(L) FOR 1231G)=19.4 8 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1257.4121 11 2+ 1.71 PS 13
182W B 0.1 LT 11.0 GT ?
182W S B EAV=169.22 60
182W G 121.5 0.0067 18[E2] 1.83 U S
182W S G KC=0.596 9$LC=0.936 13$MC=0.236 4
182W S G NC=0.0556 8$OC=0.00765 11$PC=4.50E-5 7
182W cG TI$0.019 {I5}
182W G 928.00 4 1.741 14 E2 0.00524 C
182W S G KC=0.00429 6$LC=0.000738 11$MC=0.0001698 24
182W S G NC=4.07E-5 6$OC=6.47E-6 9$PC=3.98E-7 6
182W DG $EKC=0.0039 2 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=2.26 9 (1992Ch26)
182W G 1157.302 2.08 10E2+M1+E0 -9 +6-3 0.0092 5 C
182W DG $EKC=0.0077 4 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)(1157G+1158G)=4.43 17 (1992Ch26).
182W G 1257.407 3 4.283 12 E2 0.00289 Z
182W S G KC=0.00239 4$LC=0.000378 6$MC=8.60E-5 12
182W S G NC=2.06E-5 3$OC=3.33E-6 5$PC=2.21E-7 3$IPC=1.119E-5 16
182W DG $EKC=0.00032 2 (1992Ch26), EMC+ENC=0.00012 2 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)+(ICE(M+N) FOR 1189G)=5.6 3;
182W 2DG ICE(L)=0.48 3; ICE(M+N)=0.17 3 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1289.1498 10 2- 1.12 NS 4 A
182W cL T$weighted average (normalized residuals method) of 1.06 ns {I2}
182W 2cL (1970Ab14), 1.22 ns {I2} (1971Ho14), 1.17 ns {I8} (1983El02), 1.09 ns
182W 3cL {I4} (1989Ka01). Same value in Adopted levels
182W B 531 10 43.2 9 8.32 1
182W S B EAV=158.27 59
182W G 31.7377 5 2.48 6 E1 1.628
182W S G LC=1.259 18$MC=0.293 4
182W S G NC=0.0675 10$OC=0.00910 13$PC=0.000305 5
182W G 67.74970 10 121.8 10 E1 0.202 ZC
182W S G LC=0.1563 22$MC=0.0358 5
182W S G NC=0.00840 12$OC=0.001234 18$PC=5.51E-5 8
182W G 959.73 3 0.992 11 M2+E3 -5.5 +19-100.0116 7
182W S G KC=0.0090 6$LC=0.00196 8$MC=0.000463 17
182W S G NC=0.000111 4$OC=1.73E-5 7$PC=9.3E-7 6
182W 2 G EKC=0.0095 6 (1992Ch26) $ ELC=0.0019 2 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=3.12 11, ICE(L)=0.61 7 (1992Ch26)
182W G 1189.040 3 46.78 11E1+M2+E3 0.0047 3 ZC
182W F G FLAG=B
182W cG |d(M2/E1)=+0.48 {I3}, |d(E3/E1)=-0.67 {I5}
182W DG $EKC=0.0037 3, ELC=0.00061 3, EMC+ENC=0.00014 1 (1992Ch26)$
182W DG $EKC=0.00418 14 (1975We22)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=64 3 (INCLUDES CONTRIBUTION FROM ICE(M+N) FOR 1121G);
182W 2DG ICE(L)=9.4 3; ICE(M+N)+(ICE(K) FOR 1257G)=5.6 3
182W 2DG (1992Ch26)
182W G 1289.145 3 3.893 20 M2 0.01231 ZC
182W S G KC=0.01019 15$LC=0.001630 23$MC=0.000372 6
182W S G NC=8.98E-5 13$OC=1.466E-5 21$PC=1.047E-6 15$IPC=5.96E-6 9
182W DG $ELC=0.0019 2, EMC+ENC=0.00036 3 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)+(ICE(L) FOR 1231G AND ICE(M+N) FOR 1221G)=19.4 8;
182W 2DG ICE(L)+(ICE(K) FOR 1343G)=2.48 13; ICE(M+N)=0.51 3 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1331.1153 10 3+ 0.6 NS LT A
182W cL T$ from 1965Me08; same in Adopted Levels
182W B 2.37 5 9.46 1
182W S B EAV=143.95 58
182W G 1001.700 18 5.92 3 E2+M1 -8.9 +18-210.004558 MC
182W S G KC=0.00374 6$LC=0.000627 10$MC=0.0001438 23
182W S G NC=3.45E-5 6$OC=5.51E-6 9$PC=3.48E-7 6
182W DG $EKC=0.0034 2, ELC=0.00049 4, EMC+ENC=0.00026 3 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=6.8 3; ICE(L)=0.98 7, ICE(M+N)=0.51 7 (1992Ch26)
182W G 1231.004 3 32.96 8 E2+M1 -33 +6-9 0.00301 ZC
182W F G FLAG=M
182W S G KC=0.00249 4$LC=0.000395 6$MC=9.01E-5 13
182W S G NC=2.16E-5 3$OC=3.48E-6 5$PC=2.31E-7 4$IPC=7.86E-6 11
182W DG $EKC=0.0023 1, EMC+ENC=0.000085 7 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=25.9 3; ICE(L)+(ICE(K) FOR 1289G AND ICE(M+N)
182W 2DG FOR 1221G)=19.4 8; ICE(M+N)=0.94 10 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1373.8301 10 3- 78 PS 10 A
182W cL T$from 1972He10. Others: 2.25 ns {I8} (1962Ba39), >140 ps (1971Ho14).
182W 2cL Same value in Adopted Levels
182W B 408 8 20.1 7 8.40 2
182W S B EAV=129.64 57
182W G 42.7148 4 0.760 16 E1 0.720
182W S G LC=0.557 8$MC=0.1286 18
182W S G NC=0.0299 5$OC=0.00419 6$PC=0.0001586 23
182W G 84.68024 26 7.53 5 M1+E2 +0.326 11 7.66 ZC
182W S G KC=5.84 9$LC=1.40 3$MC=0.331 8
182W S G NC=0.0790 18$OC=0.0121 3$PC=0.000593 9
182W G 116.4179 6 1.260 10 E1 0.253 ZC
182W S G KC=0.207 3$LC=0.0353 5$MC=0.00805 12
182W S G NC=0.00191 3$OC=0.000290 4$PC=1.510E-5 22
182W G 152.42991 26 19.91 10 E1 0.1258 ZC
182W S G KC=0.1038 15$LC=0.01703 24$MC=0.00387 6
182W S G NC=0.000919 13$OC=0.0001421 20$PC=7.85E-6 11
182W G 1044.42 5 0.678 12E1+M2(+E3) 0.46 9 0.0051 12 C
182W S G KC=0.0042 10$LC=0.00067 16$MC=0.00015 4
182W S G NC=3.7E-5 9$OC=6.0E-6 14$PC=4.2E-7 10
182W DG $ EKC=0.0048 3 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=1.08 7 (1992Ch26)
182W G 1273.719 3 1.872 9 E1+M2+E3 0.0029 5 ZC
182W F G FLAG=B
182W cG $ |d(M2/E1)=+0.36 {I10}; |d(E3/E1)=-0.28 {I12}
182W G 1373.824 3 0.631 6 E3 0.00496 Z
182W S G KC=0.00400 6$LC=0.000728 11$MC=0.0001685 24
182W S G NC=4.05E-5 6$OC=6.44E-6 9$PC=3.97E-7 6$IPC=1.252E-5 18
182W DG $ EKC=0.0036 3 $ ELC=0.00074 4 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=0.75 7, ICE(L)=0.154 13 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1442.836 9 4+ 0.32 PS 3
182W B 0.565 8 9.706 9
182W S B EAV=107.08 55
182W G 1113.410 18 1.262 17 E2+M1+E0 +5.6 +13-100.00376 8 C
182W S G KC=0.00311 7$LC=0.000504 10$MC=0.0001151 22
182W S G NC=2.76E-5 6$OC=4.43E-6 9$PC=2.89E-7 7$IPC=3.52E-7 6
182W G 1342.730 15 0.728 4 E2 0.00256 C
182W S G KC=0.00211 3$LC=0.000329 5$MC=7.49E-5 11
182W S G NC=1.80E-5 3$OC=2.90E-6 4$PC=1.95E-7 3$IPC=2.56E-5 4
182W DG $ ELC=0.00030 6, EMC+ENC=0.00009 3 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1487.5018 10 4- 49 PS LT A
182W cL T$from 1972He10. Other: <120 ps (1971Ho14). Same value in
182W 2cL Adopted Levels
182W B 1.3 3 9.2 1
182W S B EAV=92.86 54
182W G 44.66 11 0.085 17 [E1] 0.637 10 ?
182W S G LC=0.493 8$MC=0.1136 18
182W S G NC=0.0264 5$OC=0.00373 6$PC=0.0001436 22
182W G 113.67170 22 5.309 24 M1+E2 +0.36 1 3.18 ZC
182W F G FLAG=M
182W S G KC=2.49 4$LC=0.530 9$MC=0.1242 22
182W S G NC=0.0297 5$OC=0.00462 8$PC=0.000250 4
182W G 156.3864 3 7.58 3 E1 0.1177 ZC
182W S G KC=0.0972 14$LC=0.01590 23$MC=0.00362 5
182W S G NC=0.000858 12$OC=0.0001328 19$PC=7.38E-6 11
182W G 198.35187 29 4.157 16 E2 0.317 ZC
182W S G KC=0.1725 25$LC=0.1097 16$MC=0.0273 4
182W S G NC=0.00646 9$OC=0.000910 13$PC=1.364E-5 19
182W G 1158.1 2 0.82 10 E1 1.38E-3 C
182W S G KC=0.001159 17$LC=0.0001632 23$MC=3.66E-5 6
182W S G NC=8.79E-6 13$OC=1.432E-6 20$PC=1.021E-7 15$IPC=7.59E-6 12
182W DG $ ICE(K)(1157G+1158G)=4.43 17 (1992Ch26)
182W G 1387.390 3 0.207 3 E3+M2 2.6 4 0.0055424 ZC
182W S G KC=0.00450 21$LC=0.00079 3$MC=0.000183 7
182W S G NC=4.39E-5 16$OC=7.0E-6 3$PC=4.50E-7 21$IPC=1.426E-5 22
182W DG $ EKC=0.0040 3 (1992Ch26)
182W DG $ ICE(K)=0.281 20 (1992Ch26)
182W L 1510.25 7 4+
182W B 0.142 4 10.03 2
182W S B EAV=85.74 53
182W G 829.9 4 0.040 8 [E2] 0.00661
182W S G KC=0.00536 8$LC=0.000962 14$MC=0.000222 4
182W S G NC=5.32E-5 8$OC=8.41E-6 12$PC=4.98E-7 7
182W G 1180.85 14 0.248 8 E2+M1 -2.8 10 0.0036 4 C
182W S G KC=0.0030 4$LC=0.00047 5$MC=0.000108 11
182W S G NC=2.59E-5 25$OC=4.2E-6 5$PC=2.8E-7 4$IPC=3.12E-6 16
182W G 1410.13 8 0.1123 22 E2 0.00235 C
182W S G KC=0.00193 3$LC=0.000298 5$MC=6.76E-5 10
182W S G NC=1.624E-5 23$OC=2.62E-6 4$PC=1.783E-7 25$IPC=4.20E-5 6
182W L 1553.2240 10 4- 1.27 NS 4 A
182W cL T$weighted average of 1.35 ns {I4} (1970Ab14), 1.23 ns {I2} (1971Ho14),
182W 2cL 1.20 ns {I6} (1972He10) and 1.35 ns {I3} (1983El02). Same value in
182W 3cL Adopted Levels
182W B 246 4 29.23 25 7.50 1
182W S B EAV=72.54 52
182W G 65.72215 15 8.55 9 M1+E2 0.093 6 2.91 5 ZC
182W S G LC=2.25 4$MC=0.517 9
182W S G NC=0.1242 20$OC=0.0200 3$PC=0.001340 19
182W G 110.393 12 0.305 9 [E1] 0.290 C
182W S G KC=0.238 4$LC=0.0408 6$MC=0.00931 13
182W S G NC=0.00220 3$OC=0.000335 5$PC=1.717E-5 24
182W G 179.39381 25 8.85 4 M1+E2 +1.3 2 0.62 4 ZC
182W S G KC=0.42 5$LC=0.149 5$MC=0.0363 13
182W S G NC=0.0086 3$OC=0.00126 4$PC=3.9E-5 5
182W G 222.1085 3 21.47 7 E1 0.0480 ZC
182W S G KC=0.0399 6$LC=0.00630 9$MC=0.001429 20
182W S G NC=0.000340 5$OC=5.34E-5 8$PC=3.17E-6 5
182W G 264.0740 3 10.25 4 E2 0.1254 ZC
182W S G KC=0.0799 12$LC=0.0347 5$MC=0.00852 12
182W S G NC=0.00202 3$OC=0.000291 4$PC=6.69E-6 10
182W G 1223.60 9 0.67 8 E1+M2(+E3)-0.15 +10-250.0016 15
182W S G KC=0.0013 13$LC=1.9E-4 20$MC=4.2E-5 46
182W S G NC=1.0E-5 11$OC=1.6E-6 18$PC=1.2E-7 13$IPC=2.7E-5 3
182W G 1453.120 6 0.087 3 E3(+M2) 2.3 GT 0.0048 4 C
182W S G KC=0.0039 4$LC=0.00068 5$MC=0.000156 11
182W S G NC=3.76E-5 25$OC=6.0E-6 4$PC=3.9E-7 4$IPC=2.29E-5 4
182W cG MR$ from ce data of 1992Ch26, 1976He18 and 1966Ko12; used
182W 2cG weighted averaged I(ceK)=0.167 {I16} and I|g=0.113 {I4},
182W 3cG both relative to 100 for 1221|g; deduced |a{-K}(expt)=0.0038 {I4}
182W DG $ ICE(K)=0.12 {I2} (1992Ch26), 0.18 {I1} (1976He18),
182W 2DG 0.16 {I3} (1966Ko12) relative to 100 for K-conversion
182W 3DG line for 1221|g