182RE 182OS EC DECAY (21.84 H) 1973BU08,1973SV01 15NDS 201512
182RE H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 130, 21 (2015)$CUT=15-Jul-2015$
182RE c 1973Bu08 (also 1968BuZX): {+182}Os source from {+182}W({+3}He,3n) and
182RE2c {+185}Re(p,4n) reactions. Measured E|g, I|g, ce, |g|g, |g|g(t).
182RE c 1973Sv01: {+182}Os source from (p,xn) reaction on Re. Measured E|g,
182RE2c I|g, ce, |g|g, isotopic T{-1/2}
182RE c 1970Ak02: {+182}Os source from (p,X) on Au and ({+22}Ne,X) on Ho.
182RE2c Measured E|g, I|g, ce, subshell ratios, |g|g, (x ray)(|g) coin,
182RExc |g|g(t).
182RE c 1969An13: {+182}Os source from {+182}W(|a,2n). Measured E|g, I|g,
182RExc |g|g, |g|g(t)
182RE c 1969Pl04: {+182}Os source from (p,spallation) on Pb. Measured
182RE2c E|g, I|g, ce, |g|g
182RE c 1968Ha39: measured ce, subshell ratios, E|g deduced from ce spectrum
182RE c {+182}Os isotopic identification and half-life measurements:
182RE2c 1976Ka22, 1969Hu03, 1966Be47, 1963Gr22, 1960Su13, 1960Ne03, 1958Fo47,
182RE3c 1950St89
182RE c The level scheme is essentially from 1973Sv01, based on
182RE2c earlier schemes proposed by 1968Ha39, 1968BuZX, 1969An13, 1970Ak02.
182RE3c Several levels proposed by 1968Ha39 have not been confirmed by 1973Sv01
182RE cE LOGFT$Values have been deduced assuming x=|+50 keV
182RE cG E$Weighted average of 1973Bu08 and 1973Sv01, except that minimum
182RE2cG uncertainty is assigned from the lower of the two quoted values
182RE3cG by 1973Bu08 and 1973Sv01
182RE cG RI$Weighted average of 1973Bu08 and 1973Sv01.
182RE cG E(B),RI(B)$From 1973Bu08; not reported by 1973Sv01
182RE cG E(D),RI(D)$From 1973Sv01; not reported by 1973Bu08
182RE cG E(E)$From ce data of 1968Ha39 and/or 1970Ak02, |g not confirmed
182RE2cG by 1973Sv01 in their ce data, upper limits on |g intensity quoted.
182RE3cG Some of the lines have been identified by 1973Sv01 as possibly
182RE4cG belonging to other nuclides. The ce intensities from 1968Ha39
182RE5cG are given under comments but these are renormalized as in 1973Sv01
182RE cG RI(F)$From 1973Bu08
182RE cG RI(G)$From 1973Sv01
182RE cG M$From ce data of 1973Sv01, 1973Bu08, 1968Ha39
182RE cG $A 1410|g with I|g=0.31 (1969Pl04), <0.1 (1973Sv01) is higher than
182RE2cG the Q value, thus cannot belong to {+182}Os decay
182RE CG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
182RE2CG MR(E2/M1)=1 assumed when not given
182RE cL $The following levels have been rejected either due to revised
182RE2cL placements (by 1973Sv01 and 1973Bu08) or non-confirmation of
182RE3cL |g ray by 1973Sv01:
182RE4cL 346 (1968Ha39,1969An13) decaying by 110.5|g; 486 level (1970Ak02)
182RE5cL decaying by 223.0|g and 486|g; 504 level (1969An13) decaying by 241|g;
182RE6cL 620 level (1973Sv01) decaying by 110|g and 241|g; 632 level (1968Ha39,
182RE7cL 1973Bu08) decaying by 369.2|g and 632.3|g (1968Ha39 also show 286.4|g
182RE8cL and 315|g, 1973Bu08 show 122.3|g); 738 level (1968Ha39,1973Bu08)
182RE9cL decaying by 359|g, 475|g and 503|g; 797 level (1968Ha39,1973Bu08)
182REAcL decaying by 480|g and 561|g (1968Ha39 also show 450|g and 1973Bu08
182REBcL show 164|g and 359|g)
182RE cL J$From Adopted Levels, where all the arguments for J|p assignments
182RE2cL are specified.
182RE cL T(F)$From |g|g(t) (1970Ak02)
182RE N 0.524 10 0.524 10 1.0 1
182RE PN 3
182OS P 0.0 0+ 21.84 H 20 8.4E2 10
182OS cP T$From {+182}Os Adopted Levels
182OS cP QP$From 2012Wa38
182OS cP T$weighted average of 22.0 h {I2} (1976Ka22), 22.10 h {I25} (1973Sv01),
182OS2cP 22.6 h {I24} (1969Hu03), 21.1 h {I3} (1960Ne03) and 21.9 h {I1}
182OS3cP (1958Fo47); reduced |h{+2}=2. Values of 20.0 h {I2} (1963Gr22) and 24
182OS4cP h {I1} (1950St89) seem discrepant, thus not included in the averaging
182OS5cP procedure. Weighted average of all the measurements is: 21.6 h {I3},
182OS6cP but with reduced |h{+2}=17. Other: 1966Be47
182RE G 65.6 E
182RE cG $Ice(M)|?0.3 (1968Ha39)
182RE G 122.30 10 0.8025 B
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1973Bu08) from a tentative 632 level
182RE G 126.6 E
182RE cG $Ice(L1)=0.5, Ice(M)=0.2 (1968Ha39); Ice(M)<0.15 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 136.9 0.09 LT E
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1970Ak02)
182RE G 164.2 0.01 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.6 (1968Ha39); <0.4 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1973Bu08) from a tentative 797 level
182RE G 166.1 0.02 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)|?0.3 (1968Ha39); <0.2 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 186.7 0.01 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.28 (1968Ha39); <0.2 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 190 0.04 G
182RE cG RI$|?0.2 (1970Ak02)
182RE G 203.7 3 0.05 5 B
182REF G FLAG=E
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.29 (1968Ha39)
182RE G 223.0 0.1 LT E
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1970Ak02); <0.09 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1970Ak02) from a tentative 486 level
182RE G 261.50 10 0.16 6M1+E2 2.2 AP 0.1703 AP B
182REF G FLAG=E
182RE2 G EKC=0.95
182RES G KC AP 0.1181$LC AP 0.0398$MC AP 0.00970
182RES G NC AP 0.00233$OC AP 0.000355$PC AP 1.159E-5
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 317 level
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.16 (1968Ha39)
182RE G 292.3 0.05 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.08 (1968Ha39); <0.02 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 302.4 0.05 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.11 (1968Ha39); <0.03 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 315.2 0.02 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.14 (1968Ha39); 0.15 (1970Ak02); <0.07 (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG I|g<0.05 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39) from a tentative 632 level
182RE G 317.0 0.02 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.07 (1968Ha39); <0.02 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 317 level
182RE G 338.0 0.07 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.07 (1968Ha39)
182RE G 340.1 0.02 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.07 (1968Ha39); <0.013 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 359.0 0.05 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.10 (1968Ha39); <0.05 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from tentative 738 and
182RE2cG 797 levels
182RE G 369.2 0.06 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)|?0.07 (1968Ha39); <0.02 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 632 level
182RE G 373.2 0.06 LT E
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.08 (1968Ha39); <0.04 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 395.7 0.02 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.09 (1968Ha39); <0.016 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 402.6 0.04 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1968Ha39); <0.06 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 441 0.01 LT
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG RI$other: 0.35 (1969An13)
182RE G 450.3 0.05 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.25 (1968Ha39)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39) from a tentative 797 level
182RE G 458 0.05 LT
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG RI$|?0.04 (1970Ak02)
182RE G 475.1 0.03 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1968Ha39); <0.016 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 738 level
182RE G 479.9 0.05 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1968Ha39); <0.016 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 797 level
182RE G 486 0.09 2
182RE cG E,RI$from 1970Ak02; I|g<0.05 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1970Ak02) from a tentative 486 level
182RE G 494.6 0.1 LT E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K)|?0.35 (1968Ha39); <0.008 (1973Sv01). I|g<0.08 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 502.9 E
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.17 (1968Ha39); <0.04 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 738 level
182RE G 560.8 0.06 LT E
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG $Ice(K)|?0.10 (1968Ha39); <0.01 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 797 level
182RE G 580.0 0.06 LT E
182REF G FLAG=G
182RE cG $Ice(K)|?0.3 (1968Ha39); <0.2 (1973Sv01)
182RE G 631.1 5 0.04 AP E
182REF G FLAG=F
182RE cG $Ice(K) is weak (1968Ha39); <0.005 (1973Sv01). I|g<0.06 (1973Sv01)
182RE cG $Placement proposed (1968Ha39,1973Bu08) from a tentative 632 level
182RE L 0.0+X 2+
182RE DL E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT
182RE cL E$2012Au07 give 60 {I100} from |b decay data, 1984Sl01 estimate it as
182RE2cL |?50 keV based on singlet and triplet coupling of |p5/2[402] and
182RE3cL |n9/2[624]
182RE L 55.502+X 10 (3)+ 0.22 NS LT F
182RE G 55.50 1 11.1 5M1+E2 0.047 8 5.07 9
182RES G LC=3.91 7$MC=0.897 15
182RES G NC=0.217 4$OC=0.0364 6$PC=0.00260 4
182RE cG M,MR$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N::39 {I4}: 3.90 {I20}: 0.82 {I9}: 8.9 {I3}:
182RE2cG 1.07 {I4}: 0.241 {I14}: 2.8 {I6} (1973Sv01).
182RE3cG Others: L1:L2:L3:M::18.1:2.34:0.61:5.45 (1968Ha39),
182RE4cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3::50.0:4.8:1.3:7.2:0.72:0.24 (1970Ak02), L1=36 {I4}
182RE5cG (1973Bu08).
182RE L 235.732+X 22 (2)- 585 NS 30
182RE cL T$from |g|g(t), average of 570 ns {I30} (1973Bu08) and 600 ns {I30}
182RExcL (1969An13)
182RE E 9 6 6.8 5 1U?
182RES E CK=0.742 24$CL=0.193 17$CM+=0.064 7
182RE cE TI$intensity inconsistent with first-forbidden unique,
182RE2cE unobserved additional intensity must feed this level.
182RE G 180.20 3 65 4E1 0.0840 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.055 5
182RES G KC=0.0694 10$LC=0.01132 16$MC=0.00258 4
182RES G NC=0.000618 9$OC=9.94E-5 14$PC=5.77E-6 8
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=3.73 20 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 1.73 (1968Ha39), 4.4 (1970Ak02),
182RE2DG 3.6 8 (1973Bu08).
182RE cG M$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N::3.73 {I20}:<0.9:<0.25:0.156 {I18}:0.057 {I14}
182RE2cG (1973Sv01). Other: K:L1:L3:M::1.73:0.35:<0.14:0.14 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 235.75 6 0.66 20(E1+M2) 0.2 1 0.122 92 F
182RE2 G EKC=0.12 6
182RES G KC=0.096 70$LC=0.020 17$MC=0.0047 40
182RES G NC=0.00114 96$OC=1.9E-4 16$PC=1.2E-5 11
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.08 3 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.09 (1968Ha39), AP 0.05 (1970Ak02)
182RE cG RI$other: <1.5 (1973Sv01); this |g also coincides with another
182RE2cG decay (1973Sv01).
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1+L2:L3::0.08 {I3}:<0.043:<0.0021 (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG Other: K/L1=0.09/0.024 (1968Ha39). E2 is not ruled out by conversion
182RE3cG data, |DJ|p requires E1 or E1+M2
182RE L 263.278+X 24 1- 5.1 NS 2
182RE cL T$From |g|g(t) (1969An13)
182RE E 27 6 6.2 3
182RES E CK=0.791 9$CL=0.158 7$CM+=0.0507 25
182RE G 27.53 2 1.20 25M1 39.2 F
182RES G LC=30.3 5$MC=6.94 10
182RES G NC=1.682 24$OC=0.282 4$PC=0.0206 3
182RE cG RI$other: 2.7 {I12} (1973Sv01)
182RE cG M$M1:M2:M3:N:O::9.0 {I15}: 0.97 {I20}: 0.15 {I6}: 2.3 {I3}: 0.35 {I7}
182RE2cG (1973Sv01). Others: L1:L2:L3:M::13.0:1.82:0.43:4.24 (1968Ha39), L1=40
182RExcG {I8} (1973Bu08).
182RE G 207.80 6 0.05 LT B ?
182RE2 G EKC>0.05
182RE cG E,RI$1973Bu08 quote I|g<0.02 and
182RE2cG consider this |g as suspect. 1968Ha39 report weak K and L1
182RE3cG conversion lines corresponding to a 208.1. Placement of this |g
182RE4cG in 1968Ha39 from 554 to 346 levels is rejected here since there
182RE5cG seems no evidence for the population of a 346 level.
182RE cG $Ice(K)=0.0040 {I12} (1973Sv01). 1968Ha39 report both the K and L1
182RE2cG ce lines as weak.
182RE G 263.29 5 12.9 4E1 0.0325 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.025 3
182RES G KC=0.0270 4$LC=0.00425 6$MC=0.000967 14
182RES G NC=0.000232 4$OC=3.78E-5 6$PC=2.35E-6 4
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.34 4 (1973Bu08). OTHERS: 0.355 (1973Sv01,1968Ha39),
182RE2DG 0.37 (1970Ak02),
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1:L2:L3:M::0.355:0.045 {I6}:<0.0075:<0.013:0.014 {I4}
182RE2cG (1973Sv01). Others: K:L1:L2:L3:M::0.355:0.05:0.012:0.010:0.02
182RE3cG (1968Ha39), K/L1=0.37/0.041 (1970Ak02).
182RE L 268.750+X 25(0,1,2)-
182RE G 5.47 1 (M1) 1096 4.3 AP
182RES G M/T=0.776 8
182RES G N/T=0.189 4$O/T=0.0316 7$P/T=0.00230 5
182RES G MC=852 13
182RES G NC=207 4$OC=34.7 6$PC=2.52 4
182RE cG E,M$from Ice(M1)|?1.4 and Ice(M2)|?0.9 (1973Bu08). From
182RE2cG comparison (by the evaluators) of M1/M2 experimental ratio with the
182RE3cG calculated value from theory (using either HSICC or BrIcc codes),
182RE4cG mult=M1+E2, |d|?2.4 or E1+M2, |d|?0.2; but adopted |D|p requires
182RE5cG M1+E2. 1973Bu08 assign M1
182RE cG TI$deduced from intensity balance (evaluators) assuming no net
182RE2cG |e feeding to the 269 level.
182RE G 268.8 5 0.04 LT B ?
182RE2 G EKC>0.25
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.03 2 (1973Bu08).
182RE L 379.22+X 3 (1,2)- 0.5 NS LT F
182RE G 110.46 2 0.44 7M1(+E2) 0.65 LT 3.72 18 FC
182RE2 G EKC=2.9 5
182RES G KC=2.8 4$LC=0.67 16$MC=0.160 42
182RES G NC=0.0385 98$OC=0.0061 13$PC=0.00031 5
182RE cG $Placement from 1970Ak02 and 1973Bu08. 1973Sv01 place it
182RE2cG from a tentative 620 level; 1968Ha39 place it from a 346 level
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=1.32 11 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.76 (1968Ha39), AP 1.9
182RE2DG (1970Ak02,1973Bu08).
182RE cG RI$0.7 (1973Sv01) for 110.46+111.39
182RE cG M$K:L2:M::0.76:|?0.024:0.045 (1968Ha39).
182RE2cG Other: K/M=1.32 {I11}/0.043 {I18} (1973Sv01).
182RE G 115.92 5 1.26 13M1(+E2) 1.4 LT 3.0 4
182RE2 G EKC=2.3 9
182RES G KC=2.09 72$LC=0.72 27$MC=0.174 72
182RES G NC=0.042 17$OC=0.0064 22$PC=2.23E-4 84
182RE DG $ AVERAGE ICE(K)=3.0 11 FROM ICE(K)=1.9 (1968Ha39),
182RE2DG AP 4.1 (1970Ak02). OTHER: ICE(K)<3.9 (1973Sv01).
182RE cG M$K:L1:L2:L3:M:N:O::<3.9:<1.0:<0.43:<0.02:0.147 {I13}:0.043 {I6}:0.009
182RE2cG {I6} (1973Sv01). Other: K:L1:L3:M::1.90:|?0.26:0.02:0.12 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 143.50 4 0.16 3M1+E2 1 AP 1.436 AP C
182RE2 G EKC=0.78
182RES G KC AP 0.962$LC AP 0.361$MC AP 0.0884
182RES G NC AP 0.0212$OC AP 0.00321$PC AP 9.97E-5
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.13 (1968Ha39). OTHER: <0.23 (1973Sv01).
182RE cG M$K:L1:L2::<0.23:<0.09:0.005 {I4} (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG Other: K/L1=0.13:0.06 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 379.22 7 1.41 13E1(+M2) 0.12 LT 0.017 3 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.013 3
182RES G KC=0.0138 24$LC=0.0022 5$MC=0.00051 12
182RES G NC=0.00012 3$OC=2.0E-5 5$PC=1.4E-6 4
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.019 4 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.033 (1968Ha39), 0.02 (1970Ak02).
182RE cG M,MR$K/L1+L2=0.019 {I4}/<0.010 (1973Sv01).
182RE L 438.28+X 5 1-
182RE E 0.50 13 7.6 4
182RES E CK=0.772 24$CL=0.172 18$CM+=0.056 7
182RE G 174.98 7 0.52 10M1+E2 0.9 4 0.81 14 C
182RE2 G EKC AP 1.1
182RES G KC=0.59 16$LC=0.167 16$MC=0.040 5
182RES G NC=0.0097 11$OC=0.00150 12$PC=6.2E-5 19
182RE DG $ ICE(K) AP 0.6 (1970Ak02). OTHERS: <1.0 (1973Sv01), AP 0.24 (1968Ha39)
182RE cG M,MR$from L1/M ratio. K:L1:M::<1.0:0.055 {I14}:0.028 {I4} (1973Sv01)
182RE2cG other: K:L1:M::|?0.24:0.045:|?0.02 (1968Ha39).
182RE DG $ PLACEMENT FROM 554 TO 379 BY 1968Ha39 IS REJECTED
182RE G 202.51 10 0.108 20M1(+E2) 1 LT 0.60 10 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.66
182RES G KC=0.48 11$LC=0.096 5$MC=0.0226 16
182RES G NC=0.0055 4$OC=0.000883 25$PC=5.1E-5 13
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.075 (1970Ak02). OTHERS: <0.09 (1973Sv01), 0.023 (1968Ha39),
182RE cG M$K/L1=<0.09/0.010 {I3} (1973Sv01).
182RE G 438.46 15 0.15 7 D
182RE2 G EKC<0.076
182RE cG RI$0.12 {I3} (1970Ak02)
182RE DG $ ICE(K)<0.010 2 (1973Sv01).
182RE L 510.05+X 3 1+ 0.5 NS LT F
182RE E 62.1 13 5.3 5
182RES E CK=0.76 5$CL=0.18 4$CM+=0.060 13
182RE G 130.80 3 6.3 3E1 0.192 C
182RES G KC=0.1572 22$LC=0.0267 4$MC=0.00610 9
182RES G NC=0.001456 21$OC=0.000231 4$PC=1.250E-5 18
182RE cG M$L1:L2:L3:M:N::0.116 {I13}:0.025 {I6}:0.032 {I7}:0.036 {I9}:0.009
182RE2cG {I5} (1973Sv01). Others: K:L1:L2:L3:M::<0.61:0.08:0.030:0.036:0.035
182RE3cG (1968Ha39), K:L1:L2:L3::|?0.9:0.12:0.028:0.036 (1970Ak02).
182RE G 241.31 6 1.75 10(E1) 0.0402 C
182RE2 G EKC AP 0.033
182RES G KC=0.0334 5$LC=0.00530 8$MC=0.001207 17
182RES G NC=0.000290 4$OC=4.70E-5 7$PC=2.88E-6 4
182RE cG $Placement from 1970Ak02 and 1973Bu08. 1973Sv01 place it from
182RE2cG a tentative 620 level
182RE DG $ ICE(K) AP 0.06 (1970Ak02). OTHERS: <0.25 (1973Sv01), <0.14 (1968Ha39)
182RE cG M,MR$K/L1=<0.14/0.019 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 246.77 6 1.15 9E1+M2 0.14 3 0.072 16 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.056 9
182RES G KC=0.058 13$LC=0.0110 28$MC=0.00259 67
182RES G NC=6.3E-4 17$OC=1.03E-4 27$PC=6.6E-6 18
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.068 9 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.07 (1968Ha39), 0.04 (1970Ak02)
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1:L2:L3::0.068 {I9}:<0.012:<0.003:<0.002 (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG Other: K:L1:L3:M::0.07:0.02:|?0.004:0.008 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 274.33 5 3.48 14E1 0.0294 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.022 2
182RES G KC=0.0244 4$LC=0.00383 6$MC=0.000871 13
182RES G NC=0.000209 3$OC=3.41E-5 5$PC=2.14E-6 3
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.081 6 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.10 (1968Ha39), 0.075 (1970Ak02),
182RE2DG 0.08 2 (1973Bu08)
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1:L2:L3:M::0.081 {I6}:0.012 {I3}:<0.006:0.0021 {I11}:0.004
182RE2cG {I2} (1973Sv01). Other: K:L1:L2:M::0.10:0.019:<0.012:0.009 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 454.60 7 0.56 4E2 0.0278
182RE2 G EKC=0.018 3
182RES G KC=0.0207 3$LC=0.00545 8$MC=0.001307 19
182RES G NC=0.000314 5$OC=4.89E-5 7$PC=2.03E-6 3
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.0106 18 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.022 (1968Ha39),
182RE2DG 0.01 (1970Ak02)
182RE G 510.04 7 100 M1 0.0581 C
182RES G KC=0.0484 7$LC=0.00752 11$MC=0.001714 24
182RES G NC=0.000416 6$OC=7.00E-5 10$PC=5.17E-6 8
182RE cG $|a(K)(M1)=0.0499 used as normalization for ce data for other |g rays
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=5.23 20 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 4.5 (1968Ha39), 5.8 (1970Ak02),
182RE2DG 5.4 5 (1973Bu08).
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1+L2:L3:M:N::5.23 {I20}:0.84 {I4}:<0.01:0.198 {I9}:0.058 {I5}
182RE2cG (1973Sv01). Others: K:L1+L2:M:N::5.8:0.88:0.19:0.04 (1970Ak02),
182RE3cG K/L1=4.50/0.76 (1969Ha39).
182RE L 549.67+X 5(1)-
182RE E 0.65 11 7.1 6
182RES E CK=0.74 7$CL=0.19 5$CM+=0.064 20
182RE G 111.39 3 0.07 2 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 3.61 19 FC
182RE2 G EKC=3.3 10
182RES G KC=2.7 4$LC=0.67 17$MC=0.159 44
182RES G NC=0.038 11$OC=0.0061 14$PC=0.00030 5
182RE cG RI$0.7 (1973Sv01) for 110.46+111.39
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.245 25 (1973Sv01), 0.12 (1968Ha39).
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1:L2:L3::0.12:0.16:|?0.03:0.26 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 170.44 7 0.40 6[M1+E2] 0.84 29 C
182RES G KC=0.60 35$LC=0.19 4$MC=0.045 12
182RES G NC=0.011 3$OC=0.0017 3$PC=6.2E-5 41
182RE cG E,RI$|g from 1973Bu08 only
182RE G 286.39 10 0.12 4M1 0.270 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.29
182RES G KC=0.224 4$LC=0.0355 5$MC=0.00809 12
182RES G NC=0.00196 3$OC=0.000330 5$PC=2.42E-5 4
182RE cG M,MR$Ice(K)=0.02 (1970Ak02); K/L1=0.036/|?0.009 (1968Ha39)
182RE2cG others: K/L1=<0.033/<0.007 (1973Sv01).
182RE L 554.57+X 6 (2)+
182RE G 499.08 8 0.53 14M1+E2 0.7 5 0.048 12
182RE2 G EKC=0.039 11
182RES G KC=0.040 10$LC=0.0067 12$MC=0.00154 25
182RES G NC=0.00037 6$OC=6.2E-5 11$PC=4.2E-6 12
182RE DG $ICE(K)=0.0214 13 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.037 (1968Ha39), 0.03 (1970Ak02)
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1+L2:L3::0.0214 {I13}:0.0043 {I7}:<0.0005 (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG Other: K/L1=0.037/|?0.009 (1968Ha39).
182RE G 554.68 20 0.52 6M1 0.0467
182RE2 G EKC=0.046 8
182RES G KC=0.0389 6$LC=0.00603 9$MC=0.001374 20
182RES G NC=0.000333 5$OC=5.61E-5 8$PC=4.15E-6 6
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.025 3 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: AP 0.033 (1968Ha39),
182RE2DG 0.025 (1970Ak02).
182RE cG M,MR$K:L1+L2:L3::0.025 {I3}:0.0042 {I5}:<0.0005 (1973Sv01).
182RE2cG Other: K/L1=|?0.033/0.007 (1968Ha39).
182RE L 726.97+X 5 (1+)
182RE E 1.95 15 6.3 LT
182RE G 172.41 7 0.65 10M1+E2 0.9 3 0.85 11 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.60 11
182RES G KC=0.61 13$LC=0.176 13$MC=0.042 4
182RES G NC=0.0102 9$OC=0.00158 10$PC=6.4E-5 15
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.41 4 (1973Sv01). OTHER: AP 0.8 (1970Ak02).
182RE G 216.91 5 1.41 10M1 0.579 C
182RE2 G EKC=0.44 5
182RES G KC=0.480 7$LC=0.0764 11$MC=0.01745 25
182RES G NC=0.00423 6$OC=0.000711 10$PC=5.21E-5 8
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.65 4 (1973Sv01). OTHERS: 0.48 (1968Ha39), 0.47 (1970Ak02),
182RE2DG 0.59 20 (1973Bu08).
182RE cG M$K; L1:L2:L3:M:N::0.65 {I4}:0.103 {I14}:0.0088
182RE2cG {I20}:<0.0021:<0.046:0.0064 {I11} (1973Sv01). Others:
182RE3cG K:L1:L3:M::0.48:0.11:0.010:0.038 (1968Ha39),
182RExcG K:L1:L2:M::0.47:0.10:0.005:0.010 (1970Ak02).
182RE G 458.28 10 0.05 LT ?
182RE2 G EKC>0.05
182RE cG RI$from 1973Sv01. Other: |?0.04 (1970Ak02)
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.0028 4 (1973Sv01). OTHER: 0.008 (1973Bu08).
182RE G 726.98 20 0.25 3 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.021 3
182RE2 G EKC=0.018 3
182RES G KC=0.0171 24$LC=0.0027 3$MC=0.00061 7
182RES G NC=0.000148 17$OC=2.5E-5 3$PC=1.8E-6 3
182RE DG $ ICE(K)=0.0048 4 (1973Sv01). OTHER: 0.0038 13 (1973Bu08).