172YB 172LU EC DECAY (6.70 D) 1978BO18,1978HN01,1984KR1495NDS 199509
172YB H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 75,199 (1995)$CUT=31-May-1995$
172YB c {+172}Lu has been formed in many different reactions such as:
172YB2c (p,X) spallation reactions on Ta and Pb (1978Bo18,1978Hn01) followed
172YB3c by chemical or mass separation; {+169}Tm(|a,n) (1980En01); from
172YB4c {+172}Hf parent produced by Yb(|a,xn) (1970Se05); {+172}Yb(d,2n)
172YB5c (1976Kr04); {+172}Yb(p,n) (1968Ka01), etc.
172YB c 1978Bo18 (also 1978Bo19): measured |g, ce, |g|g
172YB c 1978Hn01: measured |g
172YB c 1970Se05 (also 1970SeZT): |g
172YB c 1968PrZW: |g, |g|g, ce
172YB c 1984Kr14: |g(|q,T), oriented nuclei. 1993KrZX report anisotropy
172YB2c for 410.3|g, 929.1|g, and 2083.4|g
172YB c Other measurements:
172YB c |g: 1993He18, 1980En01, 1978Me13, 1978BaYJ, 1976Sh26, 1976Kr04,
172YB2c 1974Ba56, 1972Dz02, 1972Ba50, 1969Mo26, 1968Ka01, 1967Kl01, 1967Co26,
172YB3c 1967Co20, 1966Vr02, 1965Ka17, 1961Ha23, 1960Wi11, 1960Bu27, 1959Di44
172YB c ce: main data are reported by 1972Ba50, 1968Ka01,
172YB2c 1964Dz01, 1964Ka07, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01 and 1960Pl03. Others: 1980Bu28,
172YB3c 1979Bu21, 1978Me13, 1977Ka30, 1974Ba56, 1974Ba21, 1972Dz02, 1969Vu01,
172YB4c 1967Kl01, 1967Co26, 1966Ba51, 1964Dz04, 1963Tu01, 1962Dz05, 1962Br40,
172YB5c 1960Io02, 1960Io01, 1960Dz02, 1960Ab06, 1959Di44, 1957Bo61
172YB c |g|g: 1980Pe16, 1978BaYJ, 1967Kl01, 1967Dz10, 1962Va07, 1960Wi11,
172YBxc 1959Di44
172YB c cece: 1960Dz08
172YB c |g|g(t): 1980En01, 1963He01
172YB c |gce(t): 1970Ra18, 1968Ka01
172YB c cece(t): 1969Vu01
172YB c Auger electrons: 1982Ar22, 1965Ka17
172YB c |b-strength functions: 1981By04 (total absorption), 1979Mi17
172YBxc (analysis)
172YB c |g(|q,T): 1983No10, 1976Kr04, 1985Fi06
172YB c |g|g(lin pol): 1967We08, 1967Bl01, 1963St09,
172YB c |g(lin pol,T): 1983No10
172YB c |g|g(|q): 1982BuZH, 1972Be94, 1971Wa03, 1965Gu01, 1963St09
172YB c |gce(|q), cece(|q): 1969Vu01, 1967Kl01
172YB c |g|g(|q,t): 1970Ra18, 1969Fo07, 1962Bl01
172YB c |g|g(|q,H): 1987Bu15, 1972Be94, 1971Wa03, 1970He17, 1965Gu01, 1964Gu01
172YB c |g|g(|q,H,t): 1969Li08
172YB c T{-1/2}({+172}Lu isotope): 1960Wi11, 1967Co26, 1967Co20, 1967Ba57,
172YB2c 1963Ra14, 1962Bo12, 1960Dz02, 1960Bu27, 1960Wi06, 1951Wi08
172YB cG The following |g rays with E|g (I|g) assigned by 1970Se05 are
172YB2cG omitted here due to lack of confirmation by other studies
172YB3cG (1978Bo18,1978Hn01,1976Kr04). Some of these may be sum lines as pointed
172YB4cG out by 1976Sh26:
172YB4cG 137.94 (0.059), 142.63 (0.158), 233.46 (0.54), 241.03 (0.11),
172YB5cG 383.1 (0.09), 562.1 (0.19), 862.4 (0.52), 953.01 (0.69),
172YB6cG 963.7 (0.27), 979.7 (0.22), 1061.83 (0.17), 1145.38 (0.80),
172YB7cG 1152.97 (0.32), 1179.3 (0.20), 1400.2 (0.32), 1592.88 (0.13).
172YB cG The following lines with E|g(ce(K)) reported by 1978Me13
172YB2cG in ce study are omitted due to lack of confirmation in |g-ray
172YB3cG studies and other electron studies: 557.5 (0.38 {I20}), 718.8 (0.9
172YB3cG {I3}), 745.0 (0.43 {I21}), 833.1 (0.55 {I22}), 1448.2 (0.05 {I3}),
172YB4cG 1452.4 (0.06 {I3}), 1501.4 (0.026 {I18})
172YB cG |a(K)exp's are generally from 1978Bo18. The electron
172YB2cG intensities are given under comments (only in ENSDF) and are relative
172YB3cG to 100 for 1094|g. Typically |a(exp)=(Ice/I|g)0.00275
172YB cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g's
172YB cL J$From adopted levels.
172YB cG E,RI$From weighted averages of 1978Bo18, 1978Hn01 and 1970Se05
172YB cG E(D)$From |g|g data (1978BaYJ)
172YB cG E(P),RI(P)$From 1978Hn01 only
172YB cG M$From ce data (generally from 1978Bo18, but other data have also
172YB2cG been considered). The ce data were normalized (by 1978Bo18) to those
172YB3cG for 662|g from {+137}Cs decay (|a(K)(M4)=0.0905). Other studies used
172YB4cG different normalization procedures: 1972Ba50 used 1093.6|g assumed as
172YB5cG E2 and 1968Ka01 used 181.5|g (mult=E2)
172YB cG MR$From |g(|q,T) (1984Kr14) when value is given with sign(|d).
172YB2cG The values without sign(|d) are from |eK(exp) (generally from 1978Bo18)
172YB cG M(R)$From subshell ratios: L1/L2=0.0661 {I7}, L2/L3=0.995 {I7}
172YB2cG (1979Bu21). L1/L2=0.069 {I3}, L1/L3=0.068 {I3}, L2/L3=0.998 {I35},
172YB3cG M1/M2=0.057 {I2}, M2/M3=0.97 {I1} (1968Ka01).
172YB4cG L3/M3=3.95 {I8}, M1/M3=0.0595 {I18}, M2/M3=0.946 {I13},
172YB5cG (M4+M5)/M3=0.0187 {I26}, N1/M3=0.011 {I4}, N2/M3=0.226 {I7},
172YB6cG N3/M3=0.227 {I6}, O1/M3=0.010 {I3}, (O2+O3)/M3=0.048 {I3},
172YB7cG (O1+O2+O3)/M3=0.058 {I4}, (N1+N2+N3)/(O1+O2+O3)= 7.9 {I6} (1980Bu28).
172YB8cG Others: 1968Ka01, 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1960Io01.
172YBxcG |a(L2)exp=2.8 {I1}
172YB CL BAND(A)$ KPI=0+ GS BAND
172YB CL BAND(B)$ KPI=0+ BETA BAND
172YB CL BAND(C)$ KPI=3+ BAND.
172YB2cL two-quasiparticle state.
172YB CL BAND(D)$ KPI=1- OCTUPOLE BAND
172YB CL BAND(E)$ KPI=2+ GAMMA BAND
172YB CL BAND(F)$ KPI=0+ BAND
172YB CL BAND(G)$ KPI=2+
172YB CL BAND(H)$ KPI=(4-) BAND
172YB CL BAND(I)$ KPI=3+ BAND
172YB CL BAND(J)$ KPI=2- OCTUPOLE BAND
172YB CL BAND(K)$ BAND 1
172YB CL BAND(L)$ KPI=4+ BAND
172YB CL BAND(M)$ KPI=3+ BAND
172YB CL BAND(N)$ KPI=4+ BAND
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG A{-2} values from |g(|q,T)
172YB tG (A{-4} |? 0 for all transitions)
172YB tG E|g 1984Kr14 1976Kr04 1983No10
172YB tG 79 0.21 {I5} b)
172YB tG 91 0.67 {I5}
172YB tG 181 -0.44 {I4} -0.45 {I3} a)
172YB tG 203 -0.44 {I6} -0.44 {I4} a) -0.420 {I20}
172YB tG 247 -0.45 {I8} a)
172YB tG 265 0.02 {I9} 0.14 {I6} b) -0.136 {I7}
172YB tG 270 -0.49 {I7} -0.59 {I3} -0.57 {I3}
172YB tG 280 -0.41 {I11} -0.41 {I7} a) -0.37 {I7}
172YB tG 324 -0.65 {I8} -0.59 {I3} -0.573 {I7}
172YB tG 330 -0.53 {I5}
172YB tG 367 -0.32 {I12} 0.20 {I19}
172YB tG 372 -0.70 {I4} -0.80 {I3} -0.655 {I13}
172YB tG 378 -0.41 {I3} -0.42 {I3} -0.326 {I22}
172YB tG 400 0.05 {I9} 0.15 {I6}
172YB tG 410 -0.71 {I4} -0.79 {I3} -0.80 {I3}
172YB tG 432 -0.46 {I5} -0.53 {I3} -0.486 {I10}
172YB tG 438 0.28 {I14}
172YB tG 482 -0.36 {I5} -0.49 {I7} -0.415 {I23}
172YB tG 486 -0.66 {I10} -0.57 {I7} -0.41 {I3}
172YB tG 490 -0.47 {I3} -0.53 {I4} -0.46 {I3}
172YB tG 524 -0.62 {I6}
172YB tG 528 -0.441 {I23} -0.48 {I3} -0.405 {I19}
172YB tG 536 -0.31 {I5} -0.42 {I6} -0.163 {I4}
172YB tG 540 -0.42 {I6} -0.41 {I5} -0.30 {I3}
172YB tG 551 -0.20 {I12} -0.32 {I11}
172YB tG 577 -0.13 {I11} 0.50 {I15}
172YB tG 585 0.20 {I16} 0.39 {I10}
172YB tG 595 -0.55 {I17} -0.50 {I10}
172YB tG 607 -0.33 {I14} -0.34 {I14} a)
172YB tG 631 0.49 {I27} 0.23 {I7}
172YB tG 682 0.32 {I11} 0.31 {I7}
172YB tG 697 0.138 {I15} 0.142 {I10} 0.121 {I2}
172YB tG 709 -0.48 {I5} -0.24 {I5}
172YB tG 723 -0.29 {I9}
172YB tG 810 -0.38 {I3} -0.421 {I17} -0.421 {I17} a)
172YB tG 816 -0.52 {I4} -0.54 {I4} -0.373 {I19}
172YB tG 901 0.186 {I17} 0.187 {I8} 0.187 {I8} a)
172YB tG 912 -0.23 {I3} -0.318 {I21} -0.216 {I12}
172YB tG 929 0.415 {I16} 0.422 {I17} 0.41 {I4}
172YB tG 968 -0.68 {I15}
172YB tG 1003 0.21 {I5} 0.250 {I19} 0.293 {I3}
172YB tG 1022 -0.54 {I6} -0.50 {I5} -0.459 {I23}
172YB tG 1041 -0.52 {I7}
172YB tG 1081 -0.27 {I10} -0.31 {I5}
172YB tG 1094 0.35 {I3} 0.46 {I3} 0.345 {I1}
172YB tG 1113 0.62 {I7} 0.75 {I7}
172YB tG 1184 -0.50 {I8} -0.29 {I13} a)
172YB tG 1289 -0.16 {I11}
172YB tG 1387 0.34 {I4} 0.48 {I5}
172YB tG 1398 0.28 {I8}
172YB tG 1403 0.42 {I5} 0.35 {I3}
172YB tG 1441 0.52 {I5} 0.46 {I4}
172YB tG 1466 -0.66 {I13} -0.67 {I10} a)
172YB tG 1470 0.13 {I8} 0.13 {I4}
172YB tG 1489 0.30 {I6} 0.29 {I3}
172YB tG 1543 0.18 {I5} 0.29 {I4}
172YB tG 1579 -0.49 {I20}
172YB tG 1584 -0.158 {I21} -0.229 {I17}
172YB tG 1603 -0.09 {I6} -0.15 {I6}
172YB tG 1622 -0.232 {I21} -0.225 {I19}
172YB tG 1666 -0.26 {I5} -0.29 {I5}
172YB tG 1670 -0.46 {I5} -0.43 {I5} a)
172YB tG 1724 -0.47 {I7} -0.46 {I3} a)
172YB tG 1813 0.14 {I7} 0.25 {I5}
172YB tG 1915 -0.23 {I3} -0.27 {I3}
172YB tG 1994 -0.11 {I6}
172YB tG 2083 -0.67 {I11} -0.63 {I9}
172YB tG 2096 -0.68 {I10}
172YB tG
172YB tG a) transition used for determination of orientation
172YB2tG coefficient
172YB tG b) from 4 millik data. Sign of A{-2} is negative
172YB2tG in the 20 millik data
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG |g(lin pol,T) data (1983No10)
172YB tG E|g pol E|g pol
172YB tG 203 -0.55 {I15} 528 -0.209 {I5}
172YB tG 265 -0.15 {I8} 536 -0.66 {I33}
172YB tG 270 -0.25 {I11} 540 -0.10 {I2}
172YB tG 280 -0.21 {I10} 697 0.14 {I9}
172YB tG 324 -0.10 {I3} 810 -0.15 {I9}
172YB tG 373 0.24 {I7} 816 -0.28 {I3}
172YB tG 378 0.32 {I8} 901 0.28 {I5}
172YB tG 410 0.45 {I22} 912 0.17 {I10}
172YB tG 433 0.23 {I4} 929 0.15 {I2}
172YB tG 482 -0.16 {I30} 1003 0.38 {I4}
172YB tG 486 -0.25 {I20} 1022 -0.27 {I6}
172YB tG 490 -0.06 {I35} 1094 -0.11 {I3}
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG A{-2} and A{-4} values from |g|g(|q)
172YB tG Level Cascade A{-2} A{-4} Reference
172YB tG 1172 912-181 0.337 {I7} -0.150 {I12} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1094-79 -0.387 {I6} -0.061 {I9} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG -0.386 {I16} -0.081 {I16} (1971Wa03)
172YB tG -0.410 {I10} -0.042 {I12} (1967Bl01)
172YB tG 1263 91-1094 {I0}.356 {I12} 0.010 {I20} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 0.354 {I16} 0.06 {I3} (1971Wa03)
172YB tG 0.420 {I20} 0.012 {I25} (1967Bl01)
172YB tG 1003-181 -0.126 {I4} 0.150 {I8} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1376 203-1094 -0.081 {I4} 0.013 {I9} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1641 377-91 -0.294 {I15} 0.00 {I3} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1663 {I1402}-181 -0.235 {I14} -0.144 {I24} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1701 528-1094 -0.173 {I17} 0.02 {I3} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 1440-181 -0.134 {I18} -0.14 {I3} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 2073 697-203 -0.050 {I22} -0.01 {I4} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 697-1094 -0.095 {I10} 0.008 {I17} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 810-91 -0.38 {I8} 0.04 {I5} (1971Wa03)
172YB tG 810-1094 -0.095 {I10} 0.008 {I17} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG 901-1094 {I0}.023 {I8} -0.015 {I13} (1982BuZH)
172YB tG Others: 1965Gu01, 1963St09
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG |gce(|q), cece(|q) data (1969Vu01)
172YB tG Level Cascade A{-2}G{-2}
172YB tG 260 181(ce(L))-79(ce(L)) 0.037 {I6}
172YB tG 181(ce(K))-79(ce(L)) 0.040 {I4}
172YB tG 181|g-79(ce(L)) 0.032 {I4}
172YB tG 1172 912(ce(K))-181(ce(K)) 0.310 {I15}
172YB tG 912(ce(K))-181(ce(L)) 0.309 {I22}
172YB tG 912|g-181(ce(K)) 0.465 {I9}
172YB tG 912|g-181(ce(L)) 0.415 {I19}
172YB tG 1094(ce(K))-79(ce(L)) -0.109 {I5}
172YB tG -0.115 {I12} (1967Kl01)
172YB tG 1094|g-79(ce(L)) -0.123 {I4}
172YB tG -0.136 {I14} (1967Kl01)
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG x-ray intensities (1978Bo18)
172YB tG (relative to 100 for 1093.6|g)
172YB tG Transition Energy Intensity
172YB tG K|a{-1}| x ray 51.35 45.7 {I9}
172YB tG K|a{-2}| x ray 52.39 79.2 {I15}
172YB tG K|b{-1} x ray 59.3 25.2 {I5}
172YB tG K|b{-2} x ray 61.0 6.51 {I13}
172YB tG ---------------------------------------------------------
172YB tG
172YB tG
172YB N 0.625 25 0.625 25 1.0 1.0
172YB cN NR$|S(I(|g+ce) of transitions to 78.7 level + I(|g+ce) of transitions
172YB2cN to g.s. (except 78.7|g))=100. I|g normalization=0.625 gives calculated
172YB3cN I(kx)=110 (1986BrZQ) compared to the observed intensity of 98
172YBxcN (1978Bo18)
172YB PN 3
172LU P 0.0 4- 6.70 D 4 2519.3 24
172YB G 155.87 7 0.032 7 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.92 6
172YBS G KC=0.74 8$LC=0.142 18$MC=0.032 5$NC+=0.0088 12
172YB cG |g reported by 1978Bo18 only
172YB cG |a(K)exp=1.2 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=14, CEL=2.0 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 174.671 19 0.180 8
172YB G 233.46 20 0.54 15
172YB G 251.46 15 0.053 10 P
172YB G 348.83 22 0.015 11 P
172YB G 596.75 15 0.102 23 P
172YB G 604.65 19 0.050 23 P
172YB G 990.75 15 0.12 6 D,E2
172YB DG G NOT REPORTED BY 1978Bo18. RI=0.16 3 (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.007
172YB DG CEK LE 0.3 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1010.71 17 0.059 20
172YB G 1012.6 3 0.050 20
172YB DG EG=1011.75 20, RI=0.071 18 (1978Bo18) IS PROBABLY A COMPOSITE
172YB2DG OF 1010.7+1012.6
172YB G 1055.4 4 0.023 10 ?
172YB cG E|g=1054.49 {I13}, I|g=0.14 {I2} (1970Se05). |g not reported
172YB2cG by 1978Bo18. I|g<0.04 (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.023
172YB DG CEK LE 0.2 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1125.22 4 0.170 8 (M1) ?
172YBS G CC=0.00555$KC=0.00466$LC=0.00067
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0076 {I15}
172YB cG RI$<0.03 (1976Kr04)
172YB DG CEK=0.50 8 (1972Ba50) CEL=0.09 4 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1961Ha23
172YB G 1148.5 3 0.023 10 P
172YB G 1572.12 17 0.045 20
172YB DG G NOT REPORTED BY 1978Bo18
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0012 gives E1 or E2
172YB DG CEK LE 0.02 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1635.2 7 0.024 7 P
172YB G 1809.42 22 0.018 3 P
172YB G 1920.50 14 0.029 3
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0063
172YB DG CEK LE 0.06 (1972Ba50)
172YB DG RI=0.16 7 (1970Se05), LT 0.024 (1976Kr04)
172YB G 2015.17 8 0.092 10 (M1) P
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I5}
172YB DG CEK FROM 1974Ba56
172YB G 2044.6 5 0.008 4 P
172YB G 2127.8 2 0.0079 22
172YB G 2134.81 9 0.014 4
172YB G 2137.8 3 0.006 3
172YB DG EG=2136.88 24, RI=0.010 3 (1978Bo18) IS PROBABLY A COMPOSITE
172YB2DG OF 2134.8+2137.8
172YB G 2212.71 23 0.007 3 P
172YB L 0.0 0+ A
172YB L 78.7427 6 2+ 1.6 NS 4 A
172YB cL T$|g|g(t) (1968Ka01)
172YB G 78.7426 6 16.9 5 E2 8.4 RC
172YBS G KC=1.57$LC=5.17$MC=1.27$NC+=0.350
172YB cG E$from 1993He18
172YB cG RI$from I(|g+ce)(79|g)(per 100 decays)=99.2 {I2}. Weighted average of
172YB2cG 1978Bo18, 1978Hn01 and 1970Se05 gives 15.8 {I7}. I|g=16.8 {I13}
172YBxcG (1978Hn01)
172YB DG CEK GT 2600, CEL1=1140 19, CEL2=16605 40, CEL3=16898 40,
172YB2DG CEM1=267 6, CEM2=4643 50, CEM3=4783 50, CE(M4+M5)=96 6, CEN=2006 25,
172YB3DG CEO=490 13 (
172YBxDG 1968Ka01). OTHER CE DATA: 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03,
172YB4DG 1960Io01, 1957Bo61
172YB DG MR(E2/M1)=4.9 4 FROM L- AND M-SUBSHELL RATIOS BUT DJPI
172YB2DG REQUIRES E2
172YB L 260.270 5 4+ A
172YB E 0.04 LT 0.9 LT 9.7 GT 0.9 LT ?
172YBS E EAV=565.6 12 $CK=0.7895 $CL=0.1258 $CM+=0.03793
172YB G 181.525 5 32.9 7 E2 0.376 C
172YBS G KC=0.219$LC=0.120$MC=0.0290$NC+=0.00790
172YB cG E$average of 181.530 {I4} (1978Bo18) and 181.519 {I6} (1965Ka17,from
172YBxcG ce(L3) line)
172YB cG M$from L1/L2=0.43 {I2}, L1/L3=0.57 {I2} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=0.210
172YBxcG {I8}
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=-0.002 {I35} (1984Kr14), <0.05 from L-subshell
172YBxcG ratios
172YB DG CEK=2630 70 (1978Bo18), CEL1=296 4, CEL2=694 6, CEL3=518 5
172YB2DG CEM=331 19,
172YBxDG CEN=89 6 (1968Ka01). OTHER CE DATA: 1961Ha23, 1963Tu01, 1965Ka17,
172YB3DG 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1960Io01, 1957Bo61
172YB L 539.984 11 6+ A
172YB E 0.00070LT 0.16 LT 11.4 GT 0.16 LT 1U?
172YBS E EAV=458.0 11 $CK=0.8150 $CL=0.1385 $CM+=0.04219
172YB G 279.705 12 1.90 6 E2 0.092 C
172YBS G KC=0.0644$LC=0.0213$MC=0.00506$NC+=0.00145
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=0.00 {I10} (1984Kr14), -0.030 {I7} (1983No10),
172YB2cG <0.07 from ce data
172YB cG M$from L1/L3=3.0 (1961Ha23) and |a(K)exp=0.072 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=52.2 13 (1978Bo18), CEL1=16, CEL3=5.3, CEM=4.3 (1961Ha23)
172YB2DG MR(E2/M1)=3.1 +8-5 FROM CE DATA. OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01,
172YB3DG 1960Pl03
172YB L 1117.99 8 2+ B
172YB E 0.14 2 10.9 1 0.14 2 1U
172YBS E CK=0.8107 $CL=0.1448 $CM+=0.04446
172YB G 857.76 11 0.135 17
172YB G 1039.25 11 0.112 10 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT
172YBS G CC=0.0061 7$KC=0.0051 6$LC=0.00074 8
172YB cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0080 {I26}
172YB DG CEK=0.35 12 (1972Ba50), 0.28 14 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB L 1172.390 8 3+ 8.33 NS 8 C
172YB cL T$from 1980En01. Others: 7.8 ns {I4} (1968Ka01), 8.14 ns {I22}
172YB2cL (1969Be34), 7.9 ns {I5} (1969Vu01)
172YB E 0.0018 5 6.3 18 8.34 13 6.3 18
172YBS E EAV=162.7 11 $CK=0.8233 $CL=0.1354 $CM+=0.04103
172YB G 912.079 17 24.4 4 M1+E2 -2.36 15 C
172YBS G CC=0.00524 9$KC=0.00433 8$LC=0.00068 1
172YB cG MR$-2.47 {I8} (1983No10), -1.9 {I1} (1976Kr04), -1.88 {I+9-14}
172YB2cG (1982BuZH), -1.7 {I2} (1969Vu01), 2.7 {I+12-6} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=43.7 14 (1978Bo18), CEL=7.3 3, CEM=1.9 2 (1968Ka01) OTHER
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1969Vu01,
172YBxDG 1968Ka01, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1093.63 2 100 2 M1+E2 -4.0 3 C
172YBS G CC=0.00328 3$KC=0.00273 2$LC=0.00042
172YB cG MR$-4.05 {I3} (1983No10), -3.2 {I2} (1976Kr04), -3.75 {I11}
172YB2cG (1982BuZH), -3.3 {I4} (1969Vu01), -3.5 {I2} (1967Bl01,1971Wa03), >4
172YBxcG (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00262 {I17}, |a(L)exp=0.00045 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=100 (USED FOR NORMALIZATION OF OTHER CE INTENSITIES),
172YB2DG CEL=15.8, CE
172YBxDG M=4.7 5 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968Ka01, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01,
172YB3DG 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB L 1221.51 9 3- D
172YB E 0.062 13 10.3 1 0.062 13
172YBS E CK=0.8230 $CL=0.1357 $CM+=0.04116
172YB G 961.03 12 0.053 20
172YB cG 1970Se05 report E|g=960.4 {I3}, I|g=0.18 {I6}. |g not
172YB2cG reported by 1978Bo18. |a(K)exp<0.10
172YB DG CEK LE 2 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1142.98 130.046 6
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0095 gives D, E2, E3
172YB DG CEK LE 0.2 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 1263.036 8 4+ 0.49 NS 3 C
172YB cL T$from |g|g(t) (1969Be34). Other: |<0.6 ns (1968Ka01)
172YB DL THERE IS A NEGATIVE INTENSITY BALANCE OF 1.7 12 AT THIS
172YB2DL LEVEL.
172YB G 90.6440 19 7.26 25 M1+E2 -1.64 2 4.72 C
172YBS G KC=1.96 1$LC=2.10 1$MC=0.513 3$NC+=0.143 1
172YB cG E$from 1993He18
172YB cG MR$from L1/L2=0.230 {I12}, L2/L3=1.045 {I21}, M1/M2=0.261 {I10},
172YB2cG M2/M3=0.935 {I28} (1968Ka01) and |a(K)exp=1.62 {I6}. Sign(|d) from
172YB3cG -2.4 {I2} (1976Kr04) and -2.33 {I15} (1982BuZH)
172YB DG CEK=4834 127, CEL1=707 6, CEL2=3064 19, CEL3=2930 19,
172YB2DG CEM1=191 6, CEM2=732 13, CEM3=783 13, CEN=484 13, CEO=63 6 (1968Ka01).
172YB3DG OTHERS: 1978Bo18,
172YBxDG 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1962Br40, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1957Bo61
172YB G 723.02 2 0.730 23 E2
172YBS G CC=0.00748$KC=0.00607$LC=0.00106
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=-0.05 {I+8-10} (1984Kr14), <0.09 from |a(K)exp
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I6}
172YB DG CEK=1.75 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW
172YB G 1002.74 2 8.4 2 E2(+M1) +13 +76-6 @C
172YB cG RI$total I|g=8.81 {I12}. Intensity divided based on adopted gammas
172YBS G CC=0.00373 2$KC=0.00309 5$LC=0.00049
172YB cG MR$>2.5 (from |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.00062 {I10}),
172YB2cG +41 {I+50-15} (1982BuZH), >+21 (1976Kr04), -23 {I3} (1983No10), >13
172YBxcG (1969Vu01)
172YB DG MR=-0.90 12 (1984Kr14) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB DG CEK=12.2 4, CEL=1.6 2 (1968Ka01), CEM=0.6 3 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1184.29 3 0.530 20 E2
172YBS G CC=0.00266$KC=0.00221$LC=0.00034
172YB cG RI$0.80 {I6} (1970Se05)
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I7} (1984Kr14), <0.06 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00228 {I24}
172YB DG CEK=0.47 4 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1972Ba50,
172YB2DG 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW
172YB L 1286.48 5 4+ B
172YB E 0.067 5 10.2 1 0.067 5
172YBS E CK=0.8224 $CL=0.1362 $CM+=0.04133
172YB G 746.5 ?
172YB cG E$from decay scheme by 1978Bo19. |g not reported by 1978Bo18, 1978Hn01,
172YB2cG and 1970Se05
172YB G 1026.21 5 0.107 7 M1,E2
172YBS G CC=0.0052 17$KC=0.0044 15$LC=0.00065 19
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I25}
172YB DG CEK=0.25 10 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 1330.93 18 4- D
172YB E 0.027 7 10.6 1 0.027 7
172YBS E CK=0.8219 $CL=0.1366 $CM+=0.04147
172YB G 1070.66 18 0.043 10 P
172YB L 1375.816 8 5+ C
172YB E 0.6 3 9.2 2 0.6 3
172YBS E CK=0.8214 $CL=0.1370 $CM+=0.04161
172YB G 112.7780 27 2.03 7 M1+E2 1.43 3 2.19 C
172YBS G KC=1.20 1$LC=0.756 7$MC=0.183 2$NC+=0.0505 5
172YB cG E$from 1993He18
172YB cG M,MR$from L1/L2=0.43 {I4}, L2/L3=1.17 {I8}, M1/M2=0.31 {I10},
172YB2cG M2/M3=1.00 {I14} (1968Ka01).
172YB cG |a(K)exp=1.06 {I21}, |a(L2)exp=0.40 {I1}
172YB DG CEK=930 13, CEL1=123 5, CEL2=281 6, CEL3=247 6, CEM1=19 6
172YB2DG CEM2=62 6, CEM3=62 6, CEN=32 6 (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1962Br40,
172YB3DG 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 203.433 13 8.03 17 E2 0.26 C
172YBS G KC=0.159$LC=0.0748$MC=0.0180$NC+=0.00499
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.01 {I5} (1984Kr14), 0.000 {I14} (1983No10),
172YB2cG <0.05 (from L1/L2=0.56 {I3}, L2/L3=1.37 {I7} (1968Ka01))
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.150 {I5}, |a(L2)exp=0.032 {I1}
172YB DG CEK=471 6, CEL1=51 2, CEL2=91 2, CEL3=67 2, CEM=51 6
172YB2DG (1968Ka01).
172YBxDG OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW, 1963Tu01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 835.85 7 0.210 13 M1+E2 1.0 6 0.008522
172YBS G KC=0.0070 19$LC=0.00107 24
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I15}
172YB DG CEK=0.64 10 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1972Ba50
172YB G 1115.54 5 0.59 5 E2 C
172YBS G CC=0.00299$KC=0.00249$LC=0.00038
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I4} gives E2
172YB cG |d(E2/M1)>3.3 (1969Vu01)
172YB DG CEK=0.54 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01,
172YB L 1465.929 15 2+ C
172YB E 0.22 7 10.2 2 0.22 7 1U
172YBS E CK=0.8011 $CL=0.1518 $CM+=0.04707
172YB G 203 DC ?
172YB G 348.6 4 0.024 13 ?
172YB DG G NOT REPORTED BY 1978Bo18
172YB G 1205.65 13 0.047 13 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00257$KC=0.00214$LC=0.00032
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.004 {I2} gives M1,E2 but |DJ|p requires E2
172YB DG CEK=0.06 2 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1387.18 2 1.39 3 M1+E2 -5.1 +11-16 @C
172YBS G CC=0.00201 3$KC=0.00168 3$LC=0.00025
172YB cG RI$a small part of the intensity may belong with 1927 level
172YB cG MR$-2.4 {I+15-8} (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00183 {I20} gives |d>2.5
172YB DG CEK=0.98 5 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.14 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1465.98 4 1.07 2 E2
172YBS G CC=0.00176$KC=0.00147$LC=0.00022
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00138 {I22} gives E2
172YB cG M$|g(|q,T) (1984Kr14,1976Kr04) consistent with E2
172YB DG CEK=0.56 7 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.10 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB L 1476.77 7 2+ F
172YB cL Level proposed by 1978Bo19 only
172YB E 0.13 2 10.4 1 0.13 2 1U
172YBS E CK=0.8007 $CL=0.1521 $CM+=0.04718
172YB G 1397.50 3 0.15 3 @C ?
172YB cG RI$total I|g=0.436 {I13}. Intensity divided on the basis of reaction
172YB2cG |g-ray studies
172YB G 1476.77 7 0.056 10 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00174$KC=0.00145$LC=0.00021
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I8} gives |d(E2/M1)>1
172YB DG CEK=0.04 2 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1964Dz01, 1961Ha23
172YB L 1510.188 13 6+ C
172YB G 134.363 18 0.103 6 E2+M1 1.3 3 1.23 6
172YBS G KC=0.78 10$LC=0.35 4$MC=0.083 9$NC+=0.0226 23
172YB cG RI$0.056 {I7} (1970Se05)
172YB cG M,MR$from L1/L2=0.62 {I19}, L2/L3=1.3 {I3} (1968Ka01) and
172YBxcG |a(K)exp=0.63 {I16}
172YB DG CEK=19 3, CEL1=3.8 13, CEL2=5.7 13, CEL3=4.4 13 (1968Ka01).
172YB2DG CEM=3.9 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 247.155 16 0.92 4 E2 0.136 C
172YBS G KC=0.091$LC=0.0343$MC=0.00818$NC+=0.00233
172YB cG M$|g(|q,T) (1984Kr14) consistent with E2
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0097 {I15} gives |d(M3/E2)<0.06
172YB cG M$from L1/L2=0.79 {I14}, L2/L3=1.52 {I25}, L1/L3=1.20 {I26} (1968Ka01)
172YB2cG and |a(K)exp=0.0097 {I15}
172YB DG CEK=28 6, CEL1=3.6 5, CEL2=4.5 5, CEL3=3.0 5, CEM=0.13 3
172YB2DG (1968Ka01). OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23
172YB G 970.0 4 0.11 6
172YB DG G NOT REPORTED BY 1978Bo18
172YB L 1549.118 17 3+ E
172YB E 0.08 LT 9.9 GT 0.08 LT ?
172YBS E CK=0.8188 $CL=0.1389 $CM+=0.04230
172YB G 1288.84 3 0.309 12 M1+E2 +2.8 +7-10 C
172YBS G CC=0.00245 13$KC=0.00205 19$LC=0.00030 2
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0022 {I3} gives |d>1.8
172YB DG CEK=0.26 3 (1978Bo18), CEL=0.06 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1470.39 3 1.14 4 M1+E2 -7.6 +19-36 C
172YBS G CC=0.00177 2$KC=0.00148 1$LC=0.00022
172YB cG MR$-7.6 {I+10-14} (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00128 {I22} gives E2
172YB DG CEK=0.57 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB L 1608.62 4 2+ G
172YB E 0.117 13 10.2 1 0.117 13 1U
172YBS E CK=0.7946 $CL=0.1566 $CM+=0.04885
172YB G 1529.78 5 0.139 13 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00136$KC=0.00136
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0014 gives E1, E2
172YB DG CEK LE 0.07 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1608.81 6 0.174 10 (E2) P
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I19} gives D, E2, E3
172YB DG CEK=0.17 12 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 1633.10 11 (4)+ F
172YB E 0.048 8 10.1 1 0.048 8
172YBS E CK=0.8171 $CL=0.1401 $CM+=0.04274
172YB G 1372.79 14 0.054 10 M1,E2
172YBS G CC=0.0027 8$KC=0.0023 6$LC=0.00033 9
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I35}
172YB DG CEK=0.10 6 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1554.38 15 0.022 7 M1,E2 P
172YB cG Placement from 1978Bo19
172YB cG |a(K)exp|?0.0015
172YB DG CEK AP 0.012 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 1640.575 10 4- H
172YB E 1.85 9 8.48 2 1.85 9
172YBS E CK=0.8169 $CL=0.1403 $CM+=0.04278
172YB G 264.798 11 1.20 3 E1(+M2) -0.09 6 0.035 14 C
172YBS G KC=0.029 11$LC=0.0047 22$MC=0.0010 5$NC+=0.00031 15
172YB cG MR$-0.03 {I4} (1976Kr04), 0.0 (from |a(K)exp). |d=-0.207 {I6}
172YB2cG (1983No10) is discrepant and gives B(M2)(W.u.)>>1 (RUL(M2)=1)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0187 {I17}
172YB DG CEK=8.6 5 (1978Bo18), 20 (1961Ha23). CEL1=3.3 (1961Ha23).
172YB2DG OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB G 377.523 12 5.36 9 E1(+M2) -0.05 4 0.012 2 C
172YBS G KC=0.0103 14$LC=0.0015 3$MC=0.00034 6$NC+=0.00010 2
172YB cG MR$-0.15 {I3} (1983No10), 0.0 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0101 {I7}
172YB DG CEK=21.2 13 (1978Bo18). CEL=3.3 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1960Tu01
172YB G 1380.23 10 0.066 23 P
172YB L 1657.85 4 (4)+ E
172YB G 1397.50 3 0.29 3 M1+E2 -1.1 +2-5 @C
172YBS G CC=0.00255 16$KC=0.00214 19$LC=0.00031 2
172YB cG MR$<-6 (1984Kr14)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I3} for possible doublet gives |d=1.4
172YBxcG {I+11-5}
172YB DG CEK=0.38 4 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB G 1578.97 12 0.16 3 E2
172YB cG RI$0.33 {I3} (1970Se05)
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.04 {I20} (1984Kr14)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3} gives E2
172YB DG CEK=0.061 22 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 1662.812 10 3+ I
172YB E 3.53 11 8.18 2 3.53 11
172YBS E CK=0.8164 $CL=0.1406 $CM+=0.04292
172YB G 399.766 15 0.882 23 M1(+E2) -0.07 7 0.075
172YBS G KC=0.0629 6$LC=0.0094 1$MC=0.00208 1$NC+=0.00062
172YB cG MR$0.00 {I4} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=-9 +6-2 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.050 {I5} (1978Bo18) gives |d=1.0 {I2}. But
172YB2cG |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3} (1972Ba50) is consistent with |d=0
172YB DG CEK=17.5 12 (1978Bo18), 37 7 (1972Ba50), 25 (1961Ha23).
172YB2DG CEL=3.0 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 490.437 14 3.06 9 M1(+E2) +0.04 4 0.044 C
172YBS G KC=0.0370 1$LC=0.00547 1$MC=0.00122$NC+=0.00035
172YB cG MR$+0.13 {I+6-5} (1976Kr04), -0.03 {I3} (1983No10)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.035 {I3} gives |d=0.7 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=40.9 11 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Tu01, 1964Ka07
172YB G 1402.53 3 1.16 3 E2(+M1) +12 +9-4 C
172YBS G CC=0.00193 13$KC=0.00161 1$LC=0.00024 2
172YB cG MR$+3.2 {I2} (1982BuZH), >+20 (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00135 {I19} consistent with E2
172YB DG CEK=0.60 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Dz01
172YB G 1584.12 4 4.22 7 E2(+M1) +55 +94-22 C
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00156 {I20} gives |d>1.5
172YB DG CEK=2.50 10 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.26 (1961Ha23). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1964Dz01
172YB cG MR$+18 {I3} (1976Kr04). |d=+0.267 {I12} (1984Kr14), +0.31 {I1}
172YB2cG (1976Kr04) are inconsistent with |a(K)exp
172YB L 1700.645 10 3+ G
172YB E 3.14 13 8.19 2 3.14 13
172YBS E CK=0.8155 $CL=0.1413 $CM+=0.04316
172YB G 151.55 6 0.064 11 [M1,E2] 0.88 18 &
172YBS G KC=0.6 3$LC=0.20 7$MC=0.047 17$NC+=0.013 5
172YB G 437.60 2 0.375 12 M1(+E2) +0.09 10 0.059
172YBS G KC=0.0495 9$LC=0.00737 8$MC=0.00164 2$NC+=0.00048 1
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0476 {I12} gives |d<1.2
172YB DG CEK=6.8 16 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Ka07
172YB G 528.260 14 6.47 12 M1(+E2) +0.01 3 0.037
172YBS G KC=0.0306$LC=0.00451
172YB cG MR$-0.03 {I2} (1983No10), +0.05 {I4} (1976Kr04), +0.08 {I+7-5}
172YBxcG (1982BuZH)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.032 {I3} gives |d<0.7
172YB DG CEK=78.2 25 (1978Bo18). CEL=11 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1440.38 3 0.96 3 M1+E2 +6.5 +22-14 C
172YBS G CC=0.00185 4$KC=0.00155 2$LC=0.00023
172YB cG MR$+10 {I+4-3} (1976Kr04), +5.5 {I+7-6} (1982BuZH)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00164 {I23} gives |d>2.5
172YB DG CEK=0.58 7 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.14, CEM=0.05 2 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1968PrZW
172YB G 1621.92 3 3.45 6 M1+E2 +17 +4-3 C
172YB cG MR$+18 {I+5-3} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=+0.31 1 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00134 {I17} gives |d>2.5
172YB DG CEK=1.75 13 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.23, CEM AP 0.08 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23
172YB L 1706.454 14 5- H
172YB E 0.46 5 9.02 5 0.46 5
172YBS E CK=0.8154 $CL=0.1414 $CM+=0.04321
172YB G 66 [M1,E2] 14 3 DC ?
172YBS G KC=6 4$LC=7 6$MC=1.6 14$NC+=0.4 4
172YB G 196.38 4 0.161 9 (E1) 0.058
172YBS G KC=0.0489$LC=0.00743$MC=0.00165$NC+=0.00046
172YB cG |a(K)exp<0.27 gives E1, E2
172YB DG CEK LT 16 (1961Ha23). 1970Se05 QUOTE EKC=0.191 16 FROM CE
172YB2DG DATA OF 1968PrZW
172YB G 330.619 21 0.83 6 E1(+M2) 0.13 LT 0.020 4 C
172YBS G KC=0.016 3$LC=0.0025 6$MC=0.00057 14$NC+=0.00017 4
172YB cG MR$from |a(K)exp. 1976Kr04 give |d=+0.36 {I28}
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.021 gives |d<0.13
172YB DG CEK LE 7 (1978Bo18). CEL=1.4 (1961Ha23). 1970Se05 QUOTE
172YB2DG EKC=0.048 30 FROM CE DATA OF 1968PrZW
172YB G 443.29 4 0.222 12 E1
172YBS G CC=0.00795$KC=0.00671$LC=0.00096$MC=0.00021
172YB cG |d(M2/E1)=-0.13 {I18} (1980DaZI)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0099 {I12} gives |d<0.15
172YB DG CEK=0.83 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1166.50 5 0.109 10 E1
172YBS G CC=0.00114$KC=0.00096$LC=0.00013
172YB cG RI$0.24 {I5} (1970Se05)
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0019
172YB DG CEK LE 0.07 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1446.20 6 0.055 5
172YB L 1749.208 10 4+ I
172YB E 0.09 LT 9.7 GT 0.09 LT ?
172YBS E CK=0.8142 $CL=0.1423 $CM+=0.04352
172YB G 200.5 4 0.079 16 E2 0.27 &
172YBS G KC=0.165 $LC=0.0794 $MC=0.0191 $NC+=0.00529
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.14 {I8} gives |d(E2/M1)>2.5
172YB DG CEK=3.9 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 373 DC ?
172YB G 486.160 18 1.06 5 M1+E2 +0.41 14 0.041 2 C
172YBS G KC=0.0346 21$LC=0.0053 2$MC=0.00117 5$NC+=0.00034 1
172YB cG MR$+0.40 {I+36-22} (1976Kr04), -0.04 {I4} (1983No10)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.036 {I3} gives |d=0.7 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=15.6 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 576.835 18 0.484 21 M1+E2 +0.24 6 0.0284 C
172YBS G KC=0.0237 4$LC=0.00350 5
172YB cG MR$-0.10 {I8} (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} gives |d<0.8
172YB DG CEK=4.6 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Tu01
172YB G 1209.13 10 0.083 8 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00255$KC=0.00213$LC=0.00032
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I26} gives M1,E2
172YB DG CEK=0.15 7 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1964Dz01
172YB G 1488.94 3 1.84 3 E2(+M1) -6 LT C
172YBS G CC=0.0023 6$KC=0.0019 5$LC=0.00028 7
172YB cG MR$<-11 (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=-1.15 10 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00131 {I19} gives E2
172YB DG CEK=0.92 9 (1978Bo18). CEL=0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS: 1972Ba50,
172YB2DG 1961Ha23
172YB G 1670.49 3 0.847 19 E2 C
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.01 {I5} (1984Kr14), <0.4 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I6}
172YB DG CEK=0.53 18 (1972Ba50). CEL AP 0.10 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23
172YB L 1778.87 5 5+ E
172YB E 0.064 17 9.79 12 0.064 17
172YBS E CK=0.8132 $CL=0.1430 $CM+=0.04376
172YB G 1238.73 8 0.092 11 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT
172YBS G CC=0.0040 4$KC=0.0034 4$LC=0.00049 5
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I13}
172YB DG CEK=0.17 5 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1518.68 6 0.073 5 M1,E2
172YBS G CC=0.0018 5$KC=0.0018 5
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I11}
172YB DG CEK=0.08 3 (1978Bo18)
172YB L 1803.113 9 4+ G
172YB E 0.71 9 8.71 6 0.71 9
172YBS E CK=0.8124 $CL=0.1436 $CM+=0.04398
172YB G 145.21 5 0.059 10 M1(+E2) 1.4 LT 1.07 13
172YBS G KC=0.80 20$LC=0.21 6$MC=0.048 14$NC+=0.013 4
172YB cG E,RI$from 1978Bo18. Line unresolved in 1978Hn01 and 1970Se05
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.68 for 145.21|g+146.03|g (1978Bo18) gives
172YBxcG |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I1}
172YB DG CEK(145G+146G)=44 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 337.85 9 0.074 11 (E2) 0.052 C ?
172YB cG E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference gives 337.18
172YBS G KC=0.0384$LC=0.0107$MC=0.00252$NC+=0.00073
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.08 {I4} gives M1,E2
172YB DG CEK AP 2 (1978Bo18), 2.6 (1961Ha23)
172YB cG Placement by the evaluator
172YB G 427.19 5 0.197 11 M1+E2 1.6 6 0.037 8
172YBS G KC=0.030 7$LC=0.0057 7$MC=0.00130 14$NC+=0.00038 5
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.034 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=2.4 2 (1978Bo18), 10 4 (1972Ba50), 3.9 (1961Ha23). OTHERS
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07
172YB G 540.187 16 2.24 6 M1(+E2) -0.03 +10-8 0.0346 @C
172YB cG E$level energy difference is 540.084
172YBS G KC=0.0289 2$LC=0.00426 3
172YB cG RI$main intensity belongs with 1803 level
172YB cG MR$-0.18 {I3} (1983No10), -0.04 {I7} or +1.0 {I+2-1} (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} gives |d=0.6 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=25 2 (1978Bo18). CEL=3.3 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 630.706 17 0.70 3 M1(+E2) -0.10 +14-17 0.0232 C
172YBS G KC=0.0194 7$LC=0.00284 6
172YB cG MR$+0.05 {I4} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=-7.0 +15-26 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0217 {I17} gives |d<0.5
172YB DG CEK=5.87 23 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1263.16 9 0.070 9 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00234$KC=0.00195$LC=0.00029
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I30} gives M1,E2 with |d<0.7 but |DJ|p
172YB2cG requires E2
172YB DG CEK=0.18 7 (1978Bo18)
172YB G 1542.850 23 1.63 3 E2(+M1) +9 +11-3 C
172YBS G CC=0.00135 16$KC=0.00135 1
172YB cG MR$or -0.84 {I+9-11} (1984Kr14). Others: <-9 or -1.2 {I2} (1976Kr04),
172YB2cG >2.5 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00145 {I21}
172YB DG CEK=0.90 9 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.12 4 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1724.35 3 0.701 16 E2 C
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.03 {I6} (1984Kr14), <0.3 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0015 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=0.40 8 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.06 3 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23
172YB L 1821.64 9 3- J
172YB E 0.022 2 10.19 4 0.022 2
172YBS E CK=0.8118 $CL=0.1441 $CM+=0.04416
172YB G 599.86 4 @ ?
172YB cG RI$only a small intensity may belong here
172YB G 1742.90 9 0.035 3
172YB L 1862.808 16 (5)+ I
172YB G 200.5 4 0.079 16 E2 0.27 &
172YBS G KC=0.165$LC=0.0794$MC=0.0191$NC+=0.00529
172YB G 352.55 4 0.102 15 E2(+M1) 2.7 GT 0.050 4
172YBS G KC=0.037 4$LC=0.0095 2$MC=0.00221 5$NC+=0.00064 2
172YB cG RI$0.35 {I11} (1970Se05)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.037 {I7}
172YB DG CEK=1.45 15 (1978Bo18), 2.2 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 599.86 4 0.22 3 E2+M1 1 GT 0.015 4 @
172YBS G KC=0.012 4$LC=0.0021 4
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.013 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=1.1 4 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1322.66 9 0.160 14 E2(+M1) 1.6 GT
172YBS G CC=0.00237 23$KC=0.00198 20$LC=0.00029 3
172YB cG MR$from |a(K)exp. 1980DaZI give |d=-0.13 {I22}
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=0.115 22 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.04 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1968PrZw, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1602.54 3 0.477 15 E2(+M1) +21 +45-9 C
172YB cG MR$or +0.21 {I4} (1984Kr14). Others: +12 {I+8-3} or +0.24 {I4}
172YB2cG (1976Kr04), >0.7 (from |a(K)exp). Lower |d is not supported by |a(K)exp
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=0.28 7 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.10 4 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1961Ha23
172YB L 1869.648 13 (4,5)- K
172YB E 0.68 4 8.64 3 0.68 4
172YBS E CK=0.8099 $CL=0.1455 $CM+=0.04466
172YB G 163.165 20 0.107 7 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.80 7
172YBS G KC=0.64 9$LC=0.125 16$MC=0.029 5$NC+=0.0078 11
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.96 {I30}
172YB DG CEK=39, CEL=5.9 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 229.080 10 0.570 15 M1(+E2) 1.4 LT 0.28 6 C
172YBS G KC=0.23 6$LC=0.0437 13$MC=0.0100 6$NC+=0.00290 11
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.28 {I9}
172YB DG CEK=60 (1961Ha23). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB G 493.83 9 0.106 25 [E1]
172YBS G CC=0.00625$KC=0.00528$LC=0.00075$MC=0.00017
172YB G 1329.72 7 0.056 7 ?
172YBS G CC=0.0029 8$KC=0.0024 7$LC=0.00035 10
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0032 {I17} gives M1,E2 but |DJ|p requires E1
172YB DG CEK=0.07 3 (1978Bo18)
172YB cG Placement by the evaluator
172YB L 1926.958 16 5+ G
172YB E 0.59 4 8.61 3 0.59 4
172YBS E CK=0.8071 $CL=0.1475 $CM+=0.04539
172YB G 416.65 8 0.137 16 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.061 7 &
172YBS G KC=0.051 6$LC=0.0079 6$MC=0.00176 11$NC+=0.00052 4
172YB G 551.078 19 0.659 22 M1+E2 +1.5 +5-4 0.020 4
172YBS G KC=0.0162 24$LC=0.0028 4
172YB cG MR$+1.1 {I3} (1976Kr04), 1.6 {I+9-4} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB DG MR=-0.18 15 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=4.7 5 (1978Bo18), 2.3 9 (1972Ba50), 6.6 (1961Ha23). OTHER
172YB2DG 1968PrZW
172YB G 664.07 5 0.173 12 M1(+E2) 1.2 LT 0.017 4 &
172YBS G KC=0.014 3$LC=0.0022 4
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.019 {I6}
172YB DG CEK=1.24 11 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1972Ba50
172YB G 1387.18 2 0.2 LT @C
172YB G 1666.84 4 0.445 9 E2(+M1) +6.9 +19-12 C
172YB cG E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference is 1666.68
172YB cG MR$-6.1 {I+9-12} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=+0.33 3 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0011 gives E2 or E1
172YB DG CEK LE 0.18 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB L 2073.125 8 4+ L
172YB E 65.0 10 6.30 1 65.0 10
172YBS E CK=0.7964 $CL=0.15535 18 $CM+=0.04825 7
172YB G 146.03 4 0.117 16 M1(+E2) 1.4 LT 1.05 13
172YBS G KC=0.79 20$LC=0.20 6$MC=0.047 14$NC+=0.013 4
172YB DG E,RI$ FROM 1978Bo18. LINE NOT RESOLVED IN 1978Hn01 AND 1970Se05
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.68 for 145.21|g+146.03|g (1978Bo18) gives
172YBxcG |d(E2/M1)=1.4 {I1}
172YB DG CEK(145G+146G)=44 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 210.28 3 0.141 11 M1(+E2) 1.1 LT 0.37 6
172YBS G KC=0.30 6$LC=0.057 4$MC=0.0130 10$NC+=0.0037 3
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.41 {I14}
172YB DG CEK=22, ELC=2.6 (1961Ha23). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB G 270.028 8 3.09 7 M1+E2 +0.79 +21-31 0.172 15 C
172YBS G KC=0.138 22$LC=0.0260 4$MC=0.00593 3$NC+=0.00176 3
172YB cG MR$or +0.09 {I+23-12} (1984Kr14). Others: +0.40 {I13} (1976Kr04),
172YB2cG <+0.61 (1983No10), 0.6 {I2} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG L1/L2=0.87 (1963Tu01). |a(K)exp=0.173 {I12}
172YB DG CEK=202 4 (1978Bo18). ELC=38 (1961Ha23), EL1C=29 6 (1978Me13)
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07, 1963Tu01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03, 1957Bo61
172YB DG K/L=7.4, L/M=2 (1960Pl03). K/L=5.8 (1960Tu01)
172YB G 323.899 15 2.40 4 M1+E2 +0.40 8 0.121 4 C
172YBS G KC=0.101 4$LC=0.0159 2$MC=0.00357 4$NC+=0.00108 1
172YB cG MR$+0.40 {I14} (1976Kr04), +0.40 {I10} (1983No10), 0.68 {I13} (from
172YBxcG |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.104 {I7}
172YB DG CEK=96 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=17 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1978Me13,
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 366.684 24 0.461 18 E1 0.0123 C
172YBS G KC=0.0103$LC=0.00151$MC=0.00033$NC+=0.00010
172YB cG |d(M2/E1)=+0.02 {I12} (1983No10), +0.04 {I7} (1976Kr04),
172YB2cG <0.05 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0102 {I19}
172YB DG CEK=1.8 4 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1961Ha23
172YB G 372.507 12 4.26 8 M1+E2 +0.71 +7-5 0.073 2 C
172YBS G KC=0.060 2$LC=0.0101 2$MC=0.00228 4$NC+=0.00068 1
172YB cG MR$+0.65 {I2} (1983No10), +1.2 {I+5-3} (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.060 {I4} gives |d=1.0 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=98 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=14 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB DG K/L=4.3, L/M=1.9 (1960Pl03)
172YB G 410.308 12 3.16 5 M1+E2 +0.74 +9-7 0.056 2 C
172YBS G KC=0.0462 20$LC=0.0076 2$MC=0.00171 4$NC+=0.00051 1
172YB cG MR$+0.94 {I+26-10} or +1.6 {I+2-4} (1976Kr04), +0.98 {I5} (1983No10),
172YB2cG 1.2 {I2} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.043 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=52 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=10 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03. K/L=4.6, L/M=4.5 (1960Pl03)
172YB G 415.7 4 0.08 4 (M1,E2) 0.048 20
172YBS G KC=0.040 18$LC=0.0069 16$MC=0.0016 4$NC+=0.00046 11
172YB cG |g reported by 1978Bo18 only
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.085 gives D, E2, E3
172YB DG $CEK LE 1.3 (ASSUMED BY 1978Bo18 FROM 1961Ha23, BUT 1961Ha23 Q
172YB2DG WEAK CEK LINE)
172YBSDG KC= 0.0569 $LC= 0.00846 $MC=0.00188 $NC+=0.00056
172YB G 432.549 13 2.62 7 E1(+M2) +0.04 +9-7 0.009 3 C
172YBS G KC=0.0073 24$LC=0.0011 5$MC=0.00024 10
172YB cG MR$+0.08 {I2} (1983No10), +0.18 {I+9-7} (1976Kr04), <0.01 (from
172YBxcG |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0063 {I15}
172YB DG CEK=6.5 15 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 524.05 4 0.358 16 M1+E2 +2.8 +5-4 0.0185 @
172YBS G KC=0.0147 7$LC=0.00281 10
172YB cG RI$main intensity belongs with decay of 2073 level
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.018 {I5} gives |d>1.3
172YB DG CEK=2.4 6 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB G 607.141 18 0.79 8 E2 0.0112 &C
172YBS G KC=0.0090$LC=0.00169
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=-0.06 {I14} (1984Kr14)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0072 {I19} gives E2
172YB DG CEK=2.06 8 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG K/L=4.0 (1960Tu01)
172YB G 697.300 16 9.81 18 M1(+E2) -0.014 10 0.0181 C
172YBS G KC=0.0152$LC=0.00221
172YB cG MR$-0.012 {I7} (1976Kr04), -0.025 {I2} (1983No10), -0.05 {I3}
172YBxcG (1982BuZH)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0145 {I16} gives |d=0.7 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=54.7 17 (1978Bo18). CEL=7.1 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB DG K/L=4.5 7, L/M=2.1 (1960Tu01). K/L=8.1 (1960Pl03)
172YB G 810.064 15 26.6 4 M1+E2 -0.08 4 0.0124 C
172YBS G KC=0.0104 1$LC=0.00151 1
172YB cG MR$-0.026 {I24} (1976Kr04), -0.03 {I+9-7} (1982BuZH)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0103 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00190 {I4} give |d=0.46 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=101 1, CEL=18.6 3 (1968Ka01). CEM=4.4 17 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 900.724 20 47.7 6 M1+E2 +0.068 9 C
172YBS G CC=0.0095$KC=0.00800 1$LC=0.00116
172YB cG MR$+0.066 {I5} (1976Kr04), +0.06 {I2} (1982BuZH)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0083 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.00123 {I3},
172YB2cG |a(M)exp=0.00026 {I1} give |d=0.58 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=146 1, CEL=21.7 3, CEM=4.5 2 (1968Ka01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1533.27 12 0.044 5
172YB G 1812.85 4 0.308 12 E2(+M1) +6.0 +57-19 C
172YB cG MR$or -0.75 {I12} (1984Kr14). Others: <-18, >+13, -1.0 {I2} (1976Kr04).
172YB2cG |a(K)exp agrees better with larger |d
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3} gives |d>1.5
172YB DG CEK=0.12 3 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01
172YB G 1994.36 6 0.239 15 E2
172YB cG |d(M3/E2)=-0.27 {I15} (1980DaZI), <0.35 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0009 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=0.08 4 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01
172YB L 2175.074 16 3+ M
172YB E 2.17 14 7.51 3 2.17 14
172YBS E CK=0.7823 $CL=0.1657 4 $CM+=0.05204 13
172YB G 517.29 10 0.064 11 [M1,E2] 0.028 11
172YBS G KC=0.023 10$LC=0.0037 11
172YB G 566.49 5 0.123 11 E2(+M1) 0.8 GT 0.019 6
172YBS G KC=0.015 5$LC=0.0026 6
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.017 {I6}
172YB DG CEK=0.75 25 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 625.95 4 0.497 21 E2(+M1) 3 GT 0.0111 7
172YBS G KC=0.0089 6$LC=0.00163 7
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0080 {I26}
172YB DG CEK=1.6 5 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1960Tu01
172YB G 709.133 17 1.31 5 M1+E2 +4.9 +10-8
172YBS G CC=0.0082 2$KC=0.00666 14$LC=0.00116 2
172YB cG MR$+16 {I+13-5} (1976Kr04), >6 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0064 {I7}
172YB DG CEK=3.22 12 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 1002.74 2 0.4 2 @C
172YB G 1914.80 3 0.955 18 M1+E2 -0.291 24 C
172YB cG MR$-0.34 {I3} (1976Kr04), <0.6 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB DG MR=-2.2 2 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00162 {I22}
172YB DG CEK=0.58 5, CEL=0.11 4, CEM=0.04 2 (1964Dz01). OTHERS:
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 2096.33 5 0.111 5 M1+E2 +0.68 +16-11
172YB cG MR$or +2.7 {I+8-7} (1984Kr14), <2.6 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=0.050 14 (1972Ba50). OTHER: 1964Dz01
172YB L 2181.98 3 (4,5,6)+
172YB cL Proposed by 1970Se05 only.
172YB E 0.22 2 8.49 4 0.22 2
172YBS E CK=0.7809 $CL=0.1667 4 $CM+=0.05240 13
172YB G 254.39 24 0.089 25 [M1,E2] 0.19 7
172YBS G KC=0.15 7$LC=0.0312 6$MC=0.00719 11$NC+=0.00210 2
172YB DG G NOT REPORTED BY 1978Bo18
172YB G 319.174 22 0.215 15 M1(+E2) 0.5 LT 0.129 8 C
172YBS G KC=0.108 7$LC=0.0167 4$MC=0.00375 8$NC+=0.00113 3
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.137 {I18}
172YB DG CEK=11.3 10 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01
172YB G 524.05 6 @ ?
172YB cG RI$only a small part of intensity may belong here
172YB L 2192.152 12 5+ L
172YB E 5.48 12 7.06 2 5.48 12
172YBS E CK=0.7788 $CL=0.1682 4 $CM+=0.05296 14
172YB G 119.023 15 0.048 9 [M1,E2] 1.90 22
172YBS G KC=1.2 6$LC=0.51 25$MC=0.12 7$NC+=0.034 17
172YB G 329.39 5 0.218 17 M1(+E2) 1 LT 0.108 18
172YBS G KC=0.089 16$LC=0.0147 10$MC=0.00332 19$NC+=0.00100 7
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.110 {I25}
172YB DG CEK=10.3 18 (1978Bo18) CEL=1.4 (1961Ha23). OTHER: 1968PrZW
172YB G 389.44 5 0.112 13
172YB cG E$poor fit in level scheme. Level energy difference gives 389.04
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.015 {I5} gives |d(M2/E1)<0.2 but |DJ|p requires
172YB2cG M1,E2. |a(K)exp excludes M1,E2
172YB DG CEK=0.7 2 (1978Bo18)
172YB G 413.2 3 0.060 22 [M1,E2] 0.049 20
172YBS G KC=0.040 18$LC=0.0070 16$MC=0.0016 4$NC+=0.00047 11
172YB G 534.29 7 0.20 3 M1(+E2) 2 LT 0.027 9
172YBS G KC=0.023 7$LC=0.0036 8
172YB DG RI=1.193 (1978Bo18) IS A MISPRINT. IT SHOULD READ
172YB2DG 0.193 (SEE 1980VyZZ)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.027 {I10}
172YB DG CEK=2.0 7 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 681.82 4 1.11 4 M1+E2 +0.10 7 0.0191 C
172YBS G KC=0.0160 2$LC=0.00233 2
172YB cG MR$+0.09 {I5} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR GT +13 (1976Kr04) IS INCONSISTENT WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0145 {I15} gives |d=0.8 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=6.2 5 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Ka07
172YB G 816.327 20 1.84 4 M1+E2 +0.20 14 0.0120 5 C
172YBS G KC=0.0100 4$LC=0.00146 5
172YB cG MR$+0.35 {I25} (1976Kr04), -0.11 {I4} (1983No10), 0.6 {I3} (from
172YBxcG |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0102 {I12}
172YB DG CEK=7.2 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Dz01, 1964Ka07, 1960Tu01
172YB G 929.106 20 4.87 11 M1+E2 -0.066 9 C
172YBS G CC=0.0088$KC=0.00741 1$LC=0.00107
172YB cG MR$-0.070 {I9} (1976Kr04), -0.06 {I2} (1983No10), 0.66 {I7} (from
172YBxcG |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0073 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=13.4 3, CEL=1.2 2 (1968Ka01). CEM=0.4 2 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1978Bo18, 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1019.79 4 0.183 15 (E2)
172YBS G CC=0.00359$KC=0.00297$LC=0.00047
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0030 gives E2, E1
172YB DG CEK LE 0.2 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1652.32 10 0.023 5
172YB G 1931.76 7 0.060 6 (M1,E2)
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0027 gives D, E2, E3
172YB DG CEK LE 0.06 (1972Ba50)
172YB L 2213.327 25 3+,4+
172YB E 0.72 3 7.87 2 0.72 3
172YBS E CK=0.7739 $CL=0.1718 5 $CM+=0.05429 17
172YB G 512.54 5 0.314 23 M1+E2 0.6 3 0.034 5
172YBS G KC=0.028 4$LC=0.0043 4
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.032 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=4.1 4 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 664.07 5 0.173 12 M1(+E2) 1.2 LT 0.017 4 &
172YBS G KC=0.014 3$LC=0.0022 4
172YB G 950.37 7 0.091 16
172YB G 1040.99 3 0.561 17 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT
172YBS G CC=0.0060 8$KC=0.0050 7$LC=0.00073 9
172YB cG MR$from |a(K)exp. Others: +0.11 {I+12-9} or +1.0 {I+3-2} for J=3 and
172YB2cG +0.51 {I7} for J=4 (1976Kr04)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0059 {I8}
172YB DG CEK=1.22 14 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01
172YB L 2285.399 11 4+ M
172YB E 5.94 14 6.66 2 5.94 14
172YBS E CK=0.7479 13 $CL=0.1908 9 $CM+=0.0613 4
172YB G 358.45 3 0.193 9 M1+E2 1.3 2 0.065 5
172YBS G KC=0.052 5$LC=0.0101 3$MC=0.00232 6$NC+=0.00068 2
172YB DG PLACEMENT WITH THE 1476 LEVEL IS UNLIKELY
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.058 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=4.41 16 (1978Bo18), 6.3 (1961Ha23)
172YB G 422.61 3 0.219 9 (M1,E2) 0.046 19
172YBS G KC=0.038 17$LC=0.0066 16$MC=0.0015 4$NC+=0.00043 11
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.072 gives D, E2, E3
172YB DG CEK LE 6 (1978Bo18), 11 4 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 482.23 4 0.93 6 M1+E2 -0.10 7 0.046
172YBS G KC=0.0385 5$LC=0.00570 5$MC=0.00127 1$NC+=0.00037
172YB cG MR$-0.03 {I2} (1983No10), +0.08 {I+18-11} or +0.82 {I+20-26}
172YB2cG (1976Kr04), 0.5 {I2} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.040 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=14.1 7 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03. K/L=1.7 (1960Tu01)
172YB G 536.194 19 1.02 6 M1+E2 -0.17 7 0.035 C
172YBS G KC=0.0290 5$LC=0.00429 5
172YB cG MR$-0.34 {I1} (1983No10), -0.02 {I9} (1976Kr04), <0.4 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB DG MR=+1.0 2 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.035 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=13.6 9 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Pl03
172YB G 584.725 17 0.538 16 M1(+E2) +0.06 9 0.0282 C
172YBS G KC=0.0236 3$LC=0.00346 3
172YB cG MR$-0.04 {I6} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=-4.3 +9-14 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0239 {I20} gives |d=0.5 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=4.90 21 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Ka07
172YB G 622.605 22 0.257 19 M1(+E2) 0.4 LT 0.023 1 C
172YBS G KC=0.0194 8$LC=0.00286 10
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=2.56 15 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 644.86 6 0.188 15
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I5} gives M1,E2 but |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I8} for
172YB2cG ce(K)=0.17 {I5} gives E1
172YB DG CEK=0.8 3 (1972Ba50). BUT 1978Bo18 QUOTE CEK=0.17 5 FROM
172YB2DG 1972Ba50
172YB G 909.70 6 1.04 8 E2(+M1) 1.3 GT
172YBS G CC=0.0054 9$KC=0.0045 8$LC=0.00070 10
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I9}
172YB DG CEK=1.9 3 (1968Ka01), 4.3 6 (1972Ba50), 7.2 16 (1964Dz01)
172YB G 1022.370 21 2.25 6 M1+E2 +0.75 17 C
172YBS G CC=0.0058 4$KC=0.0048 4$LC=0.00071 5
172YB cG MR$from 1976Kr04. Others: +0.21 {I+20-14} (1984Kr14),
172YB2cG +0.11 {I+13-9} (1976Kr04), +0.03 {I3} (1983No10), 0.75 {I25} (from
172YBxcG |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0056 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=4.7 3 (1978Bo18). CEL=1.0 (1961Ha23). OTHERS: 1968PrZW,
172YB2DG 1972Ba50, 1964Dz01, 1964Ka07, 1960Pl03
172YB G 1113.05 5 2.64 13 M1+E2 -0.18 4 C
172YBS G CC=0.00561 4$KC=0.00471 4$LC=0.00068 1
172YB cG MR$-0.26 {I5} (1976Kr04)
172YB DG MR=-2.1 +2-3 (1976Kr04) DISAGREES WITH EKC
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I4} gives |d=0.7 {I2}
172YB DG CEK=4.53 17 (1978Bo18). CEL=0.74 10, CEM=0.22 7 (1964Dz01).
172YB2DG OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23, 1960Tu01, 1960Pl03
172YB G 2024.9 3 0.090 9 M1(+E2) +0.46 44
172YB cG MR$from 1980DaZI.
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0019 {I5} gives M1
172YB DG CEK=0.065 14 (1972Ba50). OTHERS: 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01
172YB G 2206.72 15 0.013 7 (E2) ?
172YB cG Placement by evaluator
172YB cG E,RI$from 1978Hn01. E|g=2205.1 {I4}, I|g=0.050 {I17} (1970Se05).
172YB2cG E|g=2206.5 {I4} (1981MeZT). |g not reported by 1978Bo18
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I8} gives M1,E2
172YB DG CEK=0.0064 21 (1981MeZT). 1981MeZT QUOTE EKC=0.00018 11
172YB2DG WHICH SEEMS TO BE IN ERROR
172YB L 2307.83 6 3+,4+
172YB E 0.36 25 7.8 3 0.36 25
172YBS E CK=0.7347 17 $CL=0.2004 12 $CM+=0.0649 5
172YB G 607.141 18 0.79 8 E2 0.0112 &C
172YBS G KC=0.0090$LC=0.00169
172YB G 649.6 5 0.069 20 [M1,E2] 0.016 6
172YBS G KC=0.013 6$LC=0.0020 7
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.051 {I17} exceeds |a(K) for M1
172YB DG CEK=1.3 4 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 758.74 8 0.113 19 M1 0.0147
172YBS G KC=0.0123$LC=0.00179
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.020 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=0.82 8 (1978Bo18)
172YB G 2047.55 15 0.017 4
172YB L 2343.720 16 4+ N
172YB E 2.57 8 6.70 2 2.57 8
172YBS E CK=0.703 3 $CL=0.2234 21 $CM+=0.0736 8
172YB G 151.55 6 0.064 11 [M1,E2] 0.88 18 &
172YBS G KC=0.6 3$LC=0.20 7$MC=0.047 17$NC+=0.013 5
172YB G 416.65 8 0.137 16 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.061 7 &
172YBS G KC=0.051 6$LC=0.0079 6$MC=0.00176 11$NC+=0.00052 4
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.063 {I11}
172YB DG CEK=3.2 3 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23
172YB G 480.84 10 0.196 20 M1(+E2) 1.3 LT 0.038 9
172YBS G KC=0.032 8$LC=0.0050 8$MC=0.00112 16$NC+=0.00032 5
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.039 {I11}
172YB DG CEK=2.8 8 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 540.187 16 @ ?
172YB cG RI$only a small part of intensity may belong here
172YB G 594.538 19 0.67 4 M1(+E2) +0.23 +18-31 0.026
172YBS G KC=0.0220 13$LC=0.00325 15
172YB cG MR$or +0.62 {I+53-19} (1984Kr14), +0.12 {I+28-16} or -0.8
172YB2cG {I+4-3}(1976Kr04), 0.7 {I3} (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.021 {I3}
172YB DG CEK=5.5 5 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1960Tu01
172YB G 643.04 3 0.362 18 M1(+E2) 0.6 LT 0.021 2
172YBS G KC=0.0172 15$LC=0.00255 17
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0204 {I18}
172YB DG CEK=2.80 10 (1978Bo18). OTHER: 1972Ba50
172YB G 680.7 4 0.18 7 [M1,E2] 0.014 6 P ?
172YBS G KC=0.012 5$LC=0.0018 6
172YB G 703.06 8 0.218 23 [E1] P ?
172YBS G CC=0.00297$KC=0.00251$LC=0.00035
172YB G 967.89 5 0.304 14 M1+E2 -0.93 13
172YBS G CC=0.0061 3$KC=0.0051 3$LC=0.00076 4
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I6} gives |d=1.1 {I4}
172YB DG CEK=0.64 6 (1978Bo18). OTHERS: 1968PrZW, 1972Ba50, 1961Ha23,
172YB2DG 1964Dz01, 1957Bo61
172YB G 1080.68 4 1.45 4 M1+E2 -0.22 12
172YBS G CC=0.00599 17$KC=0.00502 15$LC=0.00072 2
172YB cG E|g=1080.81 {I4}, I|g=1.89 {I5} (1970Se05) not used in
172YBxcG averaging
172YB cG MR$-0.17 {I7} (1976Kr04), <0.46 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0060 {I5}
172YB DG CEK=2.5 3 (1978Bo18), 3.2 2 (1968Ka01), 3.3 2 (1972Ba50). OTH
172YB2DG 1968PrZW, 1961Ha23, 1964Dz01. K/L AP 3.7 (1960Pl03)
172YB G 1171.31 11 0.040 10
172YB cG E,RI$from 1978Hn01. I|g=0.40 {I8} for a 1172.3|g (1970Se05) is probably
172YB2cG contributed by a sum line. |g not reported by 1978Bo18
172YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.003 gives E1, E2
172YB DG CEK LE 0.04 (1972Ba50)
172YB G 1803.97 15 0.019 3 ?
172YB cG Placement by the evaluator
172YB G 2083.41 6 0.348 11 M1+E2 +0.41 14 C
172YB cG MR$+0.40 {I24} (1976Kr04), <0.25 (from |a(K)exp)
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00145 {I22}
172YB DG CEK=0.19 2 (1972Ba50). CEL=0.03 (1964Dz01). OTHER: 1961Ha23
172YB G 2265.02 8 0.021 3 (E2) ?
172YB cG Placement by the evaluator
172YB cG E,RI$from 1978Hn01. E|g=2264.5 {I4} (1981MeZT). |g not reported by
172YBxcG 1978Bo18
172YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00066 {I28} gives |d(E2/M1)>1
172YB DG CEK=0.0051 21 (1981MeZT). 1981MeZT QUOTE EKC=0.00009 4 WHICH
172YB2DG SEEMS TO BE IN ERROR