172LU 172HF EC DECAY (1.87 Y) 1979TO18,1966HA23,1962VA0795NDS 199509 172LU H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 75,199 (1995)$CUT=31-May-1995$ 172LU C 1979To18: 172HF activity produced by 175LU(P,4N) E=40 MEV. 172LU2C Measured G, GG, I(XK) 172LU C 1966Ha23: 172HF activity produced by 172YB(A,4N) E AP 80 MEV. 172LU2C Measured CE. 172LU C 1962Va07: CE data 172LU C Others: 172LU C G: 1993He18. Precise energies of five GAMMA rays determined 172LU2C from differences of closely spaced peaks 172LU C G, GG: 1970SeZT, 1967Ja10, 1965Br26, 1962Br40, 1961Br43, 1960Na04 172LU C T1/2(172HF GS): 1971Ch57. Others: 1973Or02, 1960Na11, 1951Wi08 172LU C G FACTOR measurement: 1976Kr04 172LU CL BAND(G)$ KPI=0+ BAND. 172LU2CL CONF=((P,7/2(404))(N,7/2(633))) (1979To18,1966Ha23). For the 65.79 172LU3CL and 191.60 level these assignments disagree with those from 172LU4CL (3HE,D) and (A,T). See adopted levels for detailed arguments 172LU CL E$From least-squares fit to EG's 172LU CL J$From adopted levels. 172LU CG E,RI$From 1979To18 unless otherwise stated 172LU CG M,MR$Deduced from CE data (1966Ha23) and GAMMA-ray data (1979To18). 172LU2CG The two intensity scales are normalized with respect to 126G 172LU3CG mult=M1+E2, MR=0.16 2 (from L=subshell ratios), EKC=1.60 172LU CG E(A)$From 1966Ha23. 1979To18 report that if this transition exists, 172LU2CG it is obscured by neighboring intense photon lines 172LU CG E(B)$Reported in CE data of 1966Ha23. It is treated as uncertain 172LU CG RI(B)$Photon line not seen by 1979To18, an upper limit is given 172LU CG E(D)$From 1993He18 (table 2) 172LU CG I(XK)=950 50 (1979To18) (relative to 100 for 126G). Others: 172LU2CG 1965Br26, 1962Va07, 1961Br43, 1960Na04 172LU CG The following GAMMA rays with EG(RI) reported by 1970SeZT 172LU2CG only are omitted: 45.10 (2.5), 65.67 (1.51), 76.83 (2.3), 77.80 (2.6) 172LU CL The following levels proposed by 1970SeZT and/or 1966Ha23 are 172LU2CL omitted due to lack of coincidence data to support these: 172LU3CL 133.3, 135.9, 147.6 and 264 172LU N 0.113 7 0.113 7 1.0 1.0 172LU CN NR$TI(G's to 41.86 level)=100. Comparison of TI(41.86G) AP 675 172LU2CN (deduced from CE data of 1966Ha23) with 172LU3CN TI(transitions to the 41.86)=880 50 suggests that there is no 172LU4CN direct EC feeding of the 41.86 level 172LU PN 3 172HF P 0.0 0+ 1.87 Y 3 350 50 172LU G 19.94 10 0.4 2 172LU CG E$from 1979To18 172LU G 23.4 A 172LU CG Weak L1 and L3 lines (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 172LU2CG 133-110 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 34.6 0.1 LT B 172LU CG Weak L2, L3, M lines (1966Ha23) 172LU G 73.9 0.1 LT B 172LU CG CEM=2, weak L1, L2, L3 lines (1966Ha23) 172LU G 91.3 1.0 4 A 172LU CG RI$from 1967Ja10. Weak K line (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 133-42 172LU2CG (1966Ha23) 172LU G 116.1 0.3 LT B 172LU CG CEK=14, weak L1 line (1966Ha23) 172LU G 119.0 A 172LU CG Weak K line (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 252-133 172LUxCG (1966Ha23) 172LU G 138.1 0.2 LT B 172LU CG K:L1=AP 6:0.8 (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 180-42 172LUxCG (1966Ha23) 172LU G 142.4 0.1 LT B 172LU CG CEK AP 16, weak L1 line (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 172LU2CG 252-110 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 148.8 0.1 LT B 172LU CG Weak K line (1966Ha23) 172LU G 150.4 0.1 LT B 172LU CG CEK=3 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 172.2 0.1 LT B 172LU CG CEK=1.5 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 178.5 0.1 LT B 172LU CG Partially resolved CE line (1966Ha23). 172LU G 198.9 0.1 LT B 172LU CG CEK=2 (1966Ha23). Suggested placement: 264-66 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 202.5 A 172LU CG CEK=1.5 (1966Ha23) 172LU L 0.0 4- 172LU CL G FACTOR=0.565 25 (1976Kr04, using G FACTOR for 177LU GS as 172LU2CL standard) 172LU L 41.86 4 1- 172LU G 41.86 4 0.034 3 M3 2.58E4 880 50 172LU CG E$from CE data (1962Va07) 172LU CG TI$from TI(of G's to 41.86 level) 172LU CG RI$TI/(1+CC) 172LUS G LC=1.85E4 $MC=5.43E3 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios. MR(E4/M3) LT 0.03 172LU CG L1:L2:L3:M:N=450:50:1300:665:160 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG L1:L2:L3:M1:M3:N1:N3=530:65:1250:125:375:40:125 (1962Va07) 172LU L 65.79 4 (1)+ 0.332 US 20 G 172LU CL T$from GG(T) 1965Br26. 172LU E 15 LT 8.5 GT ? 172LUS E CK=0.763 21 $CL=0.179 16 $CM+=0.058 6 172LU G 23.9331 2 180 10 E1 3.3 DC 172LUS G LC=2.53 $MC=0.579 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios. MR(M2/E1) LT 0.008 172LU CG L1:L2:L3:M:N=520:440:750:400:100 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=600:440:780:130:90:160:80 (1962Va07) 172LU L 109.41 10 (1)+ 440 US 12 172LU CL T$weighted average of 430 US 50 (1965Bj01), 450 US 20 (1966Gr22) 172LU2CL and 434 US 15 (1967Co26). 172LU CL 1979To18 assign KPI=1+ with CONF=((N,1/2(521))(P,1/2(541))) 172LU2CL but bandhead of this configuration is calculated at AP 66 KEV 172LUxCL (1976El11) 172LU E 5.9 13 8.7 3 172LUS E CK=0.75 4 $CL=0.19 3 $CM+=0.062 10 172LU G 67.35 10 47 5 E1 0.99 172LUS G KC=0.800 $LC=0.1452 $MC=0.0326 $NC+=0.00896 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios and EL1C=0.124, EMC=0.054 172LU CG L1:L2:L3:M=23:AP 10:LT 22:10 (1966Ha23) 172LU L 109.85 4 (2)+ 2.30 NS 12 G 172LU CL T from (XK+82G)(CEL(44G))(T) (1967Ja10). 172LU G 44.17 10 2.8 5 E2 122 C 172LUS G LC=92 $MC=22.62 172LU CG M$from EL2C=48. MR(E2/M1) GT 4 172LU CG L2:L3:M:N=525:610:325:100 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG L2:L3:M3:N=500:560:130:60 172LU G 68.00 10 6.1 6 [E1] 0.96 C 172LUS G KC=0.781 $LC=0.1414 $MC=0.0317 $NC+=0.00873 172LU CG E$from 1979To18 only. 172LU CG M$from absence of conversion lines 172LU L 179.85 10 (1)+ 172LU CL Probable CONF=((P,5/2(402))(N,7/2(633))) 172LU E 19 2 7.8 5 172LUS E CK=0.69 12 $CL=0.23 9 $CM+=0.08 4 172LU G 69.99 10 7.4 8 M1+E2 0.16 2 10.7 C 172LUS G KC=8.71 $LC=1.542 $MC=0.350 $NC+=0.1009 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios and EL1C=1.8 172LU CG L1:L2:L3:M=53:LT 45:AP 6:15 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG L1:L2=70:56 (1962Va07) 172LU G 114.061 3 22.6 25 M1 2.59 DC 172LUS G KC=2.162 $LC=0.333 $MC=0.0748 $NC+=0.02145 172LU CG M$from EKC=2.0, EL1C=0.28. MR(E2/M1) LT 0.6 172LU CG K:L1:M=175:25:7 (1966Ha23). CEL3 is weak 172LU CG K:L1:M=170:25:10 (1962Va07) 172LU L 191.60 4 (1)+ 0.5 NS LE G 172LU CL T$from (XK+82G)(CEL 126)(T), (XK)(126G)(T) (1967Ja10). 172LU E 58 5 7.2 6 172LUS E CK=0.67 17 $CL=0.25 12 $CM+=0.08 5 172LU G 11.8 0.4 LT [M1] 79 24 8A ? 172LU CG TI$KC=79 and RI LT 0.4 gives TI LT 32. Normalized CEM GT 12.5 gives 172LU2CG TI GT 16 172LU CG CEM GT 50 (relative to 650 for CEK(126G)) (1966Ha23) 172LU G 81.7513 5 40 2 M1+E2 0.066 15 6.8 DC 172LUS G KC=5.63 $LC=0.873 $MC=0.1956 $NC+=0.0575 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios and EKC=7.0 172LU CG K:L1:L2:L3:M=1100:200:23:5:55 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG K:L1:L2:M1=1050:150:20:40 (1962Va07) 172LU G 125.812 3 100 5 M1+E2 0.16 2 1.94 DC 172LUS G KC=1.60 1 $LC=0.261 3 $MC=0.0590 7 $NC+=0.0165 172LU CG M,MR$from L-subshell ratios 172LU CG K:L1:L2:L3:M=650:100:14:4:32 (1966Ha23) 172LU DG K:L1:L2:M:N=600:100:15:40:17 (1962Va07) 172LU L 196.58 11 (0,1,2)- ? 172LU E 0.31 6 9.5 6 ? 172LUS E CK=0.66 19 $CL=0.25 14 $CM+=0.09 6 172LU G 154.72 10 1.3 2 M1 1.09 ? 172LUS G KC=0.909 $LC=0.1401 $MC=0.0313 $NC+=0.00856 172LU CG M$from EKC=1.4, EL1C=0.19 172LU CG K:L1=7:1 (1966Ha23) 172LU L 204.00 21 (0+,1+,2+) ? 172LU E 2.1 AP 8.6 AP ? 172LUS E CK=0.65 24 $CL=0.26 17 $CM+=0.09 7 172LU G 12.41 20 0.1 AP [M1] 256 ? 172LU CG Weak CEM and CEN lines (1966Ha23) 172LU L 232.33 10 (1)+ 172LU E 6.4 10 7.8 9 172LUS E CK=0.6 6 $CL=0.3 4 $CM+=0.12 17 172LU G 41.13 10 2.37 20 M1+E2 0.14 5 12 3 C 172LUS G LC=8.9 20 $MC=2.1 5 172LU CG M$from EL1C=7.4, EMC=2.1 172LU CG L1:M=70:20 (1966Ha23). Weak L2 line 172LU G 122.916 3 10.1 10 M1+E2 2.3 10 1.6 1 D 172LUS G KC=0.80 24 $LC=0.64 10 $MC=0.16 2 $NC+=0.043 7 172LU CG M$from L-subshell ratios and EL2C=0.25, EL3C=0.21 172LU CG K:L1:L2:L3=LT 45:AP 3:10:8.5 (1966Ha23) 172LUF G FL=109.41 172LU L 237.32 14 (0-,1-) 172LU E 1.7 5 8.3 9 172LUS E CK=0.5 6 $CL=0.3 4 $CM+=0.12 17 172LU G 127.91 10 12.9 13 [E1] 0.185 172LU CG M$from absence of conversion lines 172LUS G KC=0.1530 $LC=0.02468 $MC=0.00551 $NC+=0.00148 172LUF G FL=109.41 172LU L 252.2 3 (0+,1+) ? 172LU E 5.0 AP 7.6 AP ? 172LUS E CK=0.4 5 $CL=0.4 3 $CM+=0.15 16 172LU G 48.17 20 0.8 AP (M1+E2) 0.2 AP 8.2 172LUS G LC=6.3 $MC=1.4 172LU CG M$from EL1C AP 4.8, EMC AP 1.7 172LU CG L1:L2:M=15:AP 5:5.5 (1966Ha23) 172LU G 60.65 10 AP (M1) 2.7 A 172LU CG M$from EL1C AP 1.7. MR(E2/M1) LT 0.7 172LU CG L1:M=68:LT 22 (1966Ha23). Weak L2 line 172LU CG RI$deduced by 1979To18 from CEL1 (1966Ha23) and L1C (for M1)