170ER 170HO B- DECAY (2.76 M) 1978KA16,1978TU04,1974KA2118NDS 201811
170ER H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.M. Baglin{+1}, E.A. McCutchan{+2}, S. Basunia{+1$
170ER2 H CIT=NDS 153, 1 (2018)$CUT=1-Oct-2018$
170ER C Typically, sources have been produced by 170ER(N,P), E(n)=14 MEV.
170ER C 1978KA16: measured EB, EB, IG, GG coin, BG coin, EKC.
170ER C 1974KA21: measured EG, IG, GG coin, EB, BG coin.
170ER C 1969SC01: measured EB, EG, IG, BG coin.
170ER C Measured Q-=3870 KEV 50 (1978TU04) is the same as that
170ER2C recommended in 2017WA10.
170ER C The adopted decay scheme is that of 1978KA16; it differs
170ER2C significantly from that of 1974KA21. The 1147.8 10 G, IG=1.4 8,
170ER3C placed from the 2159 level by 1974KA21, is absent in 1978KA16;
170ER4C consequently, it has been omitted here. EG and IG from 1978KA16 and
170ER5C 1974KA21 are in satisfactory agreement; however, 1978KA16 observe many
170ER6C more transitions than 1974KA21 and report EG with higher precision.
170ER cB E$Other data: 1969Sc01, 1974Ka21, 1978Ka16. The
170ER2CB EB=3000 300 endpoint reported by 1974KA21 is attributed to 28AL
170ER3CB in 1978KA16.
170ER CB IB From intensity balance, assigning 0.5IG+-0.5IG whenever
170ER2CB G placement is uncertain.
170ER CG Data are from 1978KA16, except as noted.
170ER CG RI Relative photon intensities normalized so
170ER2CG I(890.2G)=100.
170ER CG M From ECC or EKC (1978KA16). Authors normalized their
170ER2CG EKC data assuming mult=E2 for 79G and 181G (based on ECC
170ER3CG deduced by authors from intensity balance at the 79 and 260 levels).
170ER CG MR From the Adopted Gammas.
170ER CG E(A) Assignment uncertain (1978KA16).
170ER CG E(B),RI(B)$If the 934G is correctly assigned, an 855G of comparable
170ER2CG intensity should deexcite the 934 level also; this suggests that
170ER3CG the observed 854.7G (IG=55 7), placed from the 2159 level, is in fact a
170ER4CG doublet. No B- branch is expected to feed the 934 level (DJ=(4)),
170ER5CG so intensity balance requires I(934G+855G)=13.9 24 which,
170ER6CG combined with adopted branching from 934 level, implies I(855G)=7.3 13
170ER7CG (leaving IG=48 7 deexciting 2159 level) and
170ER7CG I(934G)=6.6 11 (cf. observed I(934G)=17 4). Possibly the
170ER8CG observed 934G is complex.
170ER CG E(D),RI(D)$In (N,N'G), the 477G is a doublet deexciting both 1488 and
170ER2CG 1746 levels; it is accompanied by a 406G of at least comparable
170ER3CG strength from the 1746 level and by 251G and 947G from the 1488
170ER4CG level, none of which is reported in 170HO B- decay. In this
170ER5CG decay, 477G-G coin data strongly favor placement from the 1746
170ER6CG level, and intensity balance at the 1746 level limits I(477G) from
170ER7CG 1486 level to 1.1 13. The absence of a 406G in decay is not
170ER8CG understood.
170ER CG M(M) From the Adopted Gammas.
170ER cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g, by evaluators.
170ER cL J$From the Adopted Levels.
170ER CG %IG have been deduced by evaluators.
170HO P 0 (6+) 2.76 M 5 3870 50
170ER N 0.22 3 1.00
170ER CN NR assuming |S(TI to GS)=100%.
170ER PN 3
170ER G 69.3 3 A
170ER CG From coin spectrum; weak.
170ER G 1306.9 3 2.0 4 A
170ER2 G %IG=0.45 11
170ER cG E$A 1306.8|g is placed from a 1385, 2+ level in (n,n'|g), but
170ER2CG that level could be populated only indirectly in this decay.
170ER L 0.0 0+
170ER L 78.65 8 2+
170ER G 78.65 8 52 6 E2 7.47 MC
170ER2 G %IG=11.63 18
170ERS G KC=1.738 25$LC=4.39 7$MC=1.069 16$NC+=0.270 4
170ERS G NC=0.242 4$OC=0.0281 5$PC=7.68E-5 11
170ER CG ECC=7.1 12 (1978KA16) from intensity balance.
170ER L 260.22 11 4+
170ER G 181.57 8 108 10 E2 0.348 MC
170ER2 G %IG=24 4
170ERS G KC=0.215 3$LC=0.1029 15$MC=0.0246 4$NC+=0.00629 9
170ERS G NC=0.00560 8$OC=0.000685 10$PC=9.88E-6 14
170ER CG ECC=0.33 17 (1978KA16) from intensity balance.
170ER L 540.63 15 6+
170ER B 1.8 6 7.79 15
170ER2 B EAV=1352 23
170ER G 280.44 1112 2E2 0.0849 MC
170ER2 G %IG=2.7 6
170ERS G KC=0.0612 9$LC=0.0183 3$MC=0.00430 6$NC+=0.001112 16
170ERS G NC=0.000984 14$OC=0.0001255 18$PC=3.11E-6 5
170ER L 934.06 17 2+ ?
170ER G 854.7 5 7.3 13 E2(+M1) 14 GE @ ?
170ER2 G %IG=1.6 4
170ERF G FLAG=BM
170ERS G CC=0.00468 7$KC=0.00389 6$LC=0.000620 9$MC=0.0001386 20$NC+=3.69E-5 6
170ERS G NC=3.21E-5 5$OC=4.52E-6 7$PC=2.21E-7 4
170ER G 934.10 16 6.6 CA E2 M ?
170ER2 G %IG=1.5 8
170ERF G FLAG=B
170ERS G CC=0.00387 6$KC=0.00323 5$LC=0.000502 7$MC=0.0001120 16$NC+=2.98E-5 5
170ERS G NC=2.60E-5 4$OC=3.67E-6 6$PC=1.84E-7 3
170ER L 1010.64 14(3+)
170ER G 750.4 2 24.0 13(M1+E2) -1.8E2 +11-46 MC
170ER2 G %IG=5.4 7
170ERS G CC=0.00621 9$KC=0.00512 8$LC=0.000852 12$MC=0.000191 3$NC+=5.07E-5 8
170ERS G NC=4.43E-5 7$OC=6.18E-6 9$PC=2.90E-7 4
170ER G 932.1 2 164 9(M1+E2) -1.5E2 +8-50 MC
170ER2 G %IG=37 5
170ERS G CC=0.00389 6$KC=0.00324 5$LC=0.000505 7$MC=0.0001125 16$NC+=3.00E-5 5
170ERS G NC=2.61E-5 4$OC=3.69E-6 6$PC=1.84E-7 3
170ER L 1103.47 14 4+
170ER G 843.5 2 11 3 M1+E2 +2.81 10 MC
170ER2 G %IG=2.5 8
170ERS G CC=0.00532 9$KC=0.00443 7$LC=0.000693 11$MC=0.0001546 23$NC+=4.12E-5 7
170ERS G NC=3.59E-5 6$OC=5.08E-6 8$PC=2.54E-7 4
170ER G 1024.7 4 7 3 E2 MC
170ER2 G %IG=1.6 7
170ERS G CC=0.00320 5$KC=0.00267 4$LC=0.000407 6$MC=9.05E-5 13$NC+=2.41E-5 4
170ERS G NC=2.10E-5 3$OC=2.98E-6 5$PC=1.523E-7 22
170ER L 1127.29 15 4+
170ER G 867.0 2 9.7 8 M1+E2 -9.8 +22-63 MC
170ER2 G %IG=2.2 3
170ERS G CC=0.00458 7$KC=0.00380 6$LC=0.000603 9$MC=0.0001346 20$NC+=3.58E-5 6
170ERS G NC=3.12E-5 5$OC=4.40E-6 7$PC=2.16E-7 4
170ER G 1048.7 8 2 1 E2 M
170ER2 G %IG=0.45 23
170ERS G CC=0.00305 5$KC=0.00255 4$LC=0.000387 6$MC=8.59E-5 13$NC+=2.29E-5 4
170ERS G NC=1.99E-5 3$OC=2.84E-6 4$PC=1.455E-7 21
170ER CG RI$NOTE THAT I(1049G)/I(867G)=0.21 11 here but 0.86 9 in Adopted
170ER2CG Gammas.
170ER L 1217.48 13 3(+)
170ER G 283.42 10 12 2 [M1] 0.1554 C
170ER2 G %IG=2.7 6
170ERS G KC=0.1307 19$LC=0.0192 3$MC=0.00426 6$NC+=0.001145 16
170ERS G NC=0.000993 14$OC=0.0001439 21$PC=7.98E-6 12
170ER G 957.4 3 17.0 9 D+Q MC
170ER2 G %IG=3.8 5
170ER G 1138.7 2 93 4 (M1+E2) +14 +7-4 MC
170ER2 G %IG=21 3
170ERS G CC=0.00259 4$KC=0.00218 4$LC=0.000324 5$MC=7.18E-5 11$NC+=2.02E-5 3
170ERS G NC=1.669E-5 24$OC=2.38E-6 4$PC=1.242E-7 18$IPC=1.053E-6 17
170ER L 1236.7 4 (5+)
170ER B 2.9 5 7.17 9
170ER2 B EAV=1038 23
170ER G 976.5 3 13.2 8 (M1+E2) MC
170ER2 G %IG=3.0 4
170ERS G CC=0.0050 15$KC=0.0042 13$LC=0.00062 17$MC=0.00014 4$NC+=3.7E-5 10
170ERS G NC=3.2E-5 9$OC=4.6E-6 13$PC=2.5E-7 9
170ER L 1268.80 13 (4-)
170ER G 51.30 1011.4 8 E1 0.355 6 C
170ER2 G %IG=2.6 4
170ERS G LC=0.278 5$MC=0.0619 10$NC+=0.01581 24
170ERS G NC=0.01398 21$OC=0.00177 3$PC=6.14E-5 9
170ER CG ECC LE 1.0 from intensity balance at 1217 level (1978KA16).
170ER G 141.50 9 7.8 10 [E1] 0.1293 C
170ER2 G %IG=1.7 3
170ERS G KC=0.1082 16$LC=0.01654 24$MC=0.00366 6$NC+=0.000960 14
170ERS G NC=0.000840 12$OC=0.0001146 17$PC=5.12E-6 8
170ER G 165.36 8 16.9 15 (E1) 0.0856 C
170ER2 G %IG=3.8 6
170ERS G KC=0.0718 10$LC=0.01081 16$MC=0.00239 4$NC+=0.000629 9
170ERS G NC=0.000550 8$OC=7.56E-5 11$PC=3.47E-6 5
170ER3 G EKC LE 0.2 (1978KA16)$
170ER G 258.17 9 168 10 D+Q MC
170ER2 G %IG=38 5
170ER L 1304.60 14(4+)
170ER B 4.5 19 6.93 19
170ER2 B EAV=1007 23
170ER CB IB may imply additional, as yet unobserved, G feeding
170ER2CB to 1305 level; LOGFT is low for 6+ to 4+ transition.
170ER G 87.16 9 4.8 6 M1 4.22 C
170ER2 G %IG=1.07 19
170ERS G KC=3.54 5$LC=0.533 8$MC=0.1182 17$NC+=0.0318 5
170ERS G NC=0.0276 4$OC=0.00398 6$PC=0.000219 4
170ER3 G EKC=5 3 (1978KA16)$
170ER G 1044.2 2 29.2 15 (M1+E2) +6.3 +45-18 MC
170ER2 G %IG=6.5 9
170ERS G CC=0.00314 7$KC=0.00263 6$LC=0.000397 9$MC=8.82E-5 19$NC+=2.35E-5 5
170ERS G NC=2.05E-5 5$OC=2.91E-6 7$PC=1.50E-7 4
170ER G 1226.0 3 14 2 C
170ER2 G %IG=3.1 6
170ER L 1372.31 14(5-)
170ER B 4.3 24 6.90 25
170ER2 B EAV=977 23
170ER G 103.54 8 20.5 15 M1 2.58 C
170ER2 G %IG=4.6 7
170ERS G KC=2.16 3$LC=0.324 5$MC=0.0719 11$NC+=0.0193 3
170ERS G NC=0.01676 24$OC=0.00242 4$PC=0.0001333 19
170ER3 G EKC=2.1 8 (1978KA16)$
170ER G 832.5 103 AP A ?
170ER2 G %IG=0.7 4
170ER G 1111.8 3 9.4 7 C
170ER2 G %IG=2.1 3
170ER L 1413.14 19(5+)
170ER B 0.8 4 7.60 22
170ER2 B EAV=959 23
170ER G 872.6 3 1.7 4 D+Q A ?
170ER2 G %IG=0.38 10
170ER3 G FLAG=M
170ER G 1153.0 3 8.9 8 C
170ER2 G %IG=2.0 3
170ER L 1496.24 15(6-)
170ER G 123.90 14 16 3 (M1,E2) 1.44 11 C
170ER2 G %IG=3.6 8
170ERS G KC=1.0 4$LC=0.37 18$MC=0.09 5$NC+=0.022 11
170ERS G NC=0.020 10$OC=0.0025 11$PC=5.E-5 3
170ER3 G EKC=1.1 9 (1978KA16)$
170ER G 227.41 9 16 2 [E2] 0.1650 C
170ER2 G %IG=3.6 6
170ERS G KC=0.1117 16$LC=0.0411 6$MC=0.00974 14$NC+=0.00250 4
170ERS G NC=0.00222 4$OC=0.000277 4$PC=5.42E-6 8
170ER L 1590.94 15 (6-)
170ER B 11.7 19 6.31 8
170ER2 B EAV=880 23
170ER cB E$others: 2300 {I200} (1978Ka16), 2000 (1969Sc01).
170ER G 94.67 8 11.1 9 M1 3.33 C
170ER2 G %IG=2.5 4
170ERS G KC=2.79 4$LC=0.419 6$MC=0.0931 14$NC+=0.0250 4
170ERS G NC=0.0217 3$OC=0.00314 5$PC=0.0001725 25
170ER3 G EKC=2.7 14 (1978KA16)$
170ER G 218.69 10 5.2 10
170ER2 G %IG=1.2 3
170ER L 1746.03 20 (4-) ?
170ER CL Order of 413G and 477G unknown; alternative
170ER2CL E(level)=1681.8 2. However, a 1746 level is known from (N,N'G).
170ER G 477.4 2 15.4 10 DC
170ER2 G %IG=3.4 5
170ER CG Order of 413G and 477G undetermined (1978KA16).
170ER L 2159.06 16(5+)
170ER B 64 9 5.08 8 C
170ER2 B EAV=632 22
170ER cB E$others: 1710 {I50} (1978Tu04), 1650 {I200} (1978Ka16),
170ER2cB 1500 (1969Sc01).
170ER DB IB 76% (1978Ka16) IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THEIR DECAY SCHEME.
170ER G 413.2 2 14.3 9 C
170ER2 G %IG=3.2 5
170ER CG Order of 413G and 477G undetermined (1978KA16).
170ER G 662.9 3 5.5 7 A ?
170ER2 G %IG=1.23 21
170ER G 746.0 2 7.0 10 A ?
170ER2 G %IG=1.6 3
170ER G 786.3 5 22 4 C
170ER2 G %IG=4.9 11
170ER G 854.7 5 48 7 @C
170ER2 G %IG=10.7 20
170ERF G FLAG=B
170ER G 890.2 2 100 C
170ER2 G %IG=22 3
170ER G 941.4 2 94 2 C
170ER2 G %IG=21.0 25