170LU 170HF EC DECAY 1969TR02 18NDS 201811
170LU H TYP=FUL$AUT=C.M. Baglin{+1}, E.A. McCutchan{+2}, S. Basunia{+1$
170LU2 H CIT=NDS 153, 1 (2018)$CUT=1-Oct-2018$
170LU c Sources produced, typically, by {+175}Lu(p,6n) and {+171}Yb(|a,5n).
170LU c 1970Ch17: measured E|g, I|g.
170LU c 1969Tr02: E=66 MeV; measured E|g, I|g, E(ce), I(ce), ce|g-coin,
170LU2c |g|g-coin.
170LU c 1968Ab08: measured |b|g-coin, |g|g-coin, T{-1/2}.
170LU c 1966Ha23: measured E|g, I|g, I(ce).
170LU c Other: 2000La11.
170LU c The decay scheme is that of 1969Tr02; portions of the scheme from
170LU2c 1966Ha23 differ significantly.
170LU cE IE,LOGFT$I|e is from intensity imbalance at each level, assigning
170LU2cE 0.5I|g|+0.5I|g for transitions with uncertain placement. The indicated
170LU3cE uncertainties in I|e are those which stem from
170LU4cE uncertainty in g.s. |e branching; |DI|g is not given in 1969Tr02.
170LU5cE Also, unplaced lines could influence weak branches significantly
170LU6cE (2.4% of I|g remains unplaced). Consequently, |D(log| {Ift}) represents
170LU7cE a lower limit, and log| {Ift} values for weak branches do not
170LU8cE constitute reliable arguments for J|p assignments.
170LU cE LOGFT(Z)$Apparently too low to allow J(213)=2; log| {If{+1u}t}<8.5 for
170LU2cE I|e>0.5%.
170LU cG Data are from 1969Tr02, except as noted. Conversion electron
170LU2cG data are given in comments; uncertainty in Ice from 1969Tr02 is |?20%.
170LU3cG Conversion coefficients, when given, are calculated by the evaluator
170LU4cG from authors' stated I|g and Ice (some values differ from those given
170LU5cG in table 3 of 1969Tr02); the authors' normalization gives values
170LU6cG consistent with those expected based on subshell ratios for low
170LU7cG energy transitions, and with E1 theory for the 164.7, 572.9 and 620.7
170LU8cG keV transitions. |a(K)exp for other E1 transitions are, typically,
170LU9cG within about 30% of E1 theory, but those for 541|g, 481|g, 470|g are
170LUAcG 40-50% high.
170LU cG E From table 1 of 1969Tr02 for transitions listed in
170LU2cG that table; from tables 4 and 5 otherwise. For several transitions,
170LU3cG slight energy differences (|<0.1 keV) exist between data in these
170LU4cG tables. |DE=0.1 for photon data (1969Tr02); internal consistency of
170LU5cG ce energies from different subshells is at least of that precision, so
170LU6cG evaluator assigns |DE=0.1 to all transitions, except 661, 674, 724,
170LU7cG which 1969Tr02 quote to nearest keV only.
170LU cG RI Relative photon intensities from 1969Tr02 normalized so
170LU2cG I(165|g)=119.50; uncertainties not stated by authors. I|g values
170LU3cG (|+10%) given by 1970Ch17 are in excellent agreement with those of
170LU4cG 1969Tr02 for 10 of the 12 lines measured by 1970Ch17.
170LU cG M From available subshell ratios and/or |a(K)exp.
170LU cG MR From conversion electron intensities; uncertainties unknown.
170LU cG E(A) Assignment probable although only photons were
170LU2cG observed (1969Tr02).
170LU cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g, by evaluators.
170LU cL J From Adopted Levels.
170LU cL T From |g|g(t) measurement (1968Ab08), except where noted.
170LU CL BAND(F) KPI=0+ GS BAND.
170LU2cL Configuration (|p 7/2[404])-(|n 7/2[633]) (1969Tr02).
170LU3cL Odd J members exhibit Newby shift.
170LU CL BAND(Y) KPI=1- BAND.
170LU2cL Configuration (|p 7/2[404])-(|n 5/2[512]) (1969Tr02).
170LU CL BAND(W) PROPOSED KPI=0- BAND;
170LU2cL configuration (|p 1/2[411])-(|n 1/2[521]) (1969Tr02).
170LU CL BAND(X) KPI=1- BAND.
170LU2cL Configuration (|p 1/2[411])+(|n 1/2[521]) (1969Tr02).
170HF P 0.0 0+ 16.01 H 13 1052 33
170LU N 0.22 6 0.22 6 1 1.
170LU cN NR no |e+|b{++} branch to g.s. has been observed. log|
170LU2cN {Ift}>6.4 is expected for this 0+ to 0+, isospin-forbidden transition;
170LU3cN this implies |e+|b{++} branching<40% to g.s. The evaluators,
170LU4cN therefore, assume %|e+|b{++}=20 {I20} to g.s., so |S (I(|g+ce) to
170LU5cN g.s.)=80% {i20}. |D(I|g normalization) allows only for uncertainty in
170LU6cN branching to g.s.; it would rise to 0.07 if |DI|g were 20%.
170LU PN 3
170LU G 72.0 1 0.14 A
170LU G 112.8 1 0.40 AP A
170LU G 115.0 1 0.90 AP A
170LU G 116.9 1 1.70 AP A
170LU G 117.8 1 2.00 AP A
170LU G 127.4 1 0.14 A
170LU G 139.2 1 0.08 A
170LU cG May connect 315.6 and 176.7 levels as in Adopted Levels,
170LU2cG gammas.
170LU G 143.6 1 A
170LU cG Weak line.
170LU G 147.7 1 A
170LU cG Weak line.
170LU G 183.9 1 0.14 A
170LU G 189.3 1 0.25 A
170LU G 218.3 1 0.35 A
170LU G 262.0 1 0.40 A
170LU G 269.0 1 0.50 A
170LU G 278.8 1 0.40 A
170LU G 304.2 1 1.37 M1 0.1647
170LUS G KC=0.1379 20$LC=0.0209 3$MC=0.00469 7$NC+=0.001282 18
170LUS G NC=0.001107 16$OC=0.0001643 23$PC=1.022E-5 15
170LU3 G EKC=0.153 (1969Tr02)$
170LU cG E$fits 304.2 to g.s. transition, but mult not consistent.
170LU G 310.5 1 0.43 A
170LU G 462.0 1 0.20 AP M1 0.0545
170LUS G KC=0.0457 7$LC=0.00683 10$MC=0.001532 22$NC+=0.000419 6
170LUS G NC=0.000362 5$OC=5.38E-5 8$PC=3.36E-6 5
170LU4 G EKC=0.11 (1969Tr02)$
170LU G 494.8 1 0.18 M1 0.0456
170LUS G KC=0.0383 6$LC=0.00571 8$MC=0.001279 18$NC+=0.000350 5
170LUS G NC=0.000302 5$OC=4.49E-5 7$PC=2.81E-6 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.050$
170LU G 533.5 1 0.18 A
170LU G 554.1 1 0.28 A
170LU G 602.2 1 0.40 A
170LU G 605.2 1 A
170LU cG Weak line.
170LU G 632.7 1 0.15 A
170LU G 654.5 1 0.06 A
170LU G 661 0.10 A
170LU G 674 0.15 A
170LU G 692.8 1 0.11 A
170LU G 711.4 1 0.06 A
170LU G 724 0.03 A
170LU L 0.0 0+ F
170LU E 40 LE 6.3 GE
170LUS E CK=0.8179 5$CL=0.1393 4$CM+=0.04277 13
170LU L 44.50 5 2+ 3.00 NS 6 F
170LU G 44.52 10 1.15 E2 114.6 21 C
170LUS G LC=87.4 16$MC=21.7 4$NC+=5.55 10
170LUS G NC=4.96 9$OC=0.589 11$PC=0.000369 6
170LU cG L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N=73:4830:5800:1285:1550:750 (1969Tr02)
170LU L 92.89 9 (4)- 0.67 S 10 M
170LU cL $from decay scheme, a 4.2% {I12} intensity imbalance occurs
170LU2cL at this level; no |e feeding is expected. See comment on 96 level.
170LU cL T from Adopted Levels.
170LU cL J probable configuration=((|p 7/2[404])+(|n 1/2[521]))
170LU2cL (1969Tr02).
170LU G 48.42 10 M2 223 19.5
170LUS G L/T=0.754 9$M/T=0.189 4$N+/T=0.0518 12
170LUS G N/T=0.0452 11$O/T=0.00635 15$P/T=0.000311 8
170LU cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=910:90:390:280:40:110:100 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI 0.0871, from Ice=19.50 (1969Tr02) and |a.
170LU L 96.01 10(3)-
170LU cL J possible configuration (|p 1/2[541])-(|n 7/2[633])
170LU2cL (1988So04, who predict the (|p 7/2[404])-(|n 1/2[521]) configuration
170LU3cL suggested for this level in 1969Tr02 to be at higher energy).
170LU cL No transition has been observed to deexcite the 96 level.
170LU2cL If a 3.09 transition to the 92.89 (4)- level existed, it presumably
170LU3cL could not have been detected, but the other possible transitions
170LU4cL (both |DK=(3)) should have been within the experimental range of
170LU5cL 1969Tr02. I(|g+ce)=19 {I5} would be needed in order to remove the
170LU6cL intensity imbalance at the 93 level, consistent with the expected
170LU7cL absence of an |e branch to that level from the 0+ parent.
170LU L 98.49 6 1+ F
170LU cL E$note that adopted band assignment differs from that shown
170LU2cL here and in 1969Tr02 and 1988So04.
170LU E 2.3 7 7.49 14
170LUS E CK=0.8162 6$CL=0.1406 5$CM+=0.04323 17
170LU G 54.03 10 5.00 M1 3.67
170LUS G LC=2.85 5$MC=0.641 10$NC+=0.175 3
170LUS G NC=0.1515 23$OC=0.0224 4$PC=0.001381 21
170LU cG $L1:L2:M1:N=1260:140:310:90 (1969Tr02)
170LU G 98.55 1015.0 M1 3.84 C
170LUS G KC=3.20 5$LC=0.495 7$MC=0.1113 16$NC+=0.0304 5
170LUS G NC=0.0263 4$OC=0.00389 6$PC=0.000240 4
170LU3 G EKC=2.52 (1969Tr02)$
170LU cG K:L1:L2:M1:N=3780:690:60:170:45 (1969Tr02). ce(K) unresolved
170LU2cG from ce(L3, 44.5).
170LU L 114.87 7(3)+
170LU E 1.0 3 7.84 14 ?
170LUS E CK=0.8159 7$CL=0.1408 5$CM+=0.04332 17
170LU G 16.39 10 E2+(M3) 0.03 AP 2.52E4 AP22.0 C
170LUS G L/T AP 0.748$M/T AP 0.200$N+/T AP 0.052
170LUS G N/T AP 0.0466$O/T AP 0.0055$P/T AP 2.85E-5
170LU cG M1:M2:M3:N:O=32:180:250:100:20 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI 0.00087, from Ice=22.0 (1969Tr02) and |a=25200.
170LU cG M,MR from subshell ratios, |g is predominantly E2. Authors assign
170LU2cG M1+E2 with |d=2.0. However the subshell ratios are also
170LU3cG consistent with E2+M3, |d|?0.03 (from M1:M2). The latter is adopted
170LU4cG for consistency with level scheme.
170LU G 70.42 10 1.00 M1 10.09
170LUS G KC=8.40 13$LC=1.313 20$MC=0.295 5$NC+=0.0807 12
170LUS G NC=0.0697 11$OC=0.01033 15$PC=0.000636 10
170LU3 G EL1C=1.0$M1/L1=0.25 (1969Tr02)
170LU L 116.00 7(1)+
170LU E 3.4 10 7.31 14
170LUS E CK=0.8158 7$CL=0.1408 5$CM+=0.04333 17
170LU G 71.48 10 1.00 M1 9.66
170LUS G KC=8.05 12$LC=1.257 19$MC=0.283 5$NC+=0.0773 12
170LUS G NC=0.0668 10$OC=0.00989 15$PC=0.000609 9
170LU2 G EL1C=1.00 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG $L1:M1:N=100:24:9
170LU G 115.95 10 2.90 [M1] 2.41
170LUS G KC=2.01 3$LC=0.310 5$MC=0.0697 10$NC+=0.0191 3
170LUS G NC=0.01646 24$OC=0.00244 4$PC=0.0001506 22
170LU4 G EKC=0.62
170LU cG $K:L1=180:35 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI 3.5 {I4} in 1970Ch17, but this may include I(115|g).
170LU cG M E2(+M1) from |a(K)exp, but K/L1=5 cf. 10 and 7 for E2 and
170LU2cG M1, respectively, favors M1; feeds 0+ state so cannot be M1+E2.
170LU3cG I(ceK) probably includes ce(M1) of 55.2|g (1969Tr02).
170LU L 164.71 6 1- 3.90 NS 20 Y
170LU E 2.7 9 7.36 15
170LUS E CK=0.8148 8$CL=0.1416 6$CM+=0.04361 19
170LU G 120.19 10 68.5 E1 0.216 C
170LUS G KC=0.179 3$LC=0.0290 5$MC=0.00653 10$NC+=0.001733 25
170LUS G NC=0.001514 22$OC=0.000209 3$PC=9.88E-6 14
170LU3 G EKC=0.146
170LU cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:N=1000:145:37:42:50:13 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 65 {I6} in 1970Ch17.
170LU G 164.71 10 119.5 E1 0.0946 C
170LUS G KC=0.0788 11$LC=0.01232 18$MC=0.00276 4$NC+=0.000739 11
170LUS G NC=0.000644 9$OC=9.05E-5 13$PC=4.55E-6 7
170LU3 G EKC=0.080
170LU cG K:L1:L2:L3:M=950:100:20:22:33 (1969Tr02)
170LU L 170.00 72+
170LU G 55.19 10 5.10 M1+E2 0.13 4.06 7
170LUS G LC=3.14 5$MC=0.719 11$NC+=0.194 3
170LUS G NC=0.169 3$OC=0.0242 4$PC=0.001279 20
170LU cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=1270:215:150:320:80:80 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG MR from L1/L3. however, subshell ratios are not mutually
170LU2cG consistent.
170LU G 71.58 100.40 E2 12.99
170LUS G KC=1.513 22$LC=8.74 14$MC=2.17 4$NC+=0.558 9
170LUS G NC=0.498 8$OC=0.0597 10$PC=0.0001106 16
170LU cG L2:L3:M2:M3:N=150:162:37:40:20 (1969Tr02)
170LU L 176.70 11 3+ F
170LU G 132.20 10 0.20 M1+E2 1.42 24
170LUS G KC=0.9 5$LC=0.36 15$MC=0.09 4$NC+=0.023 10
170LUS G NC=0.020 9$OC=0.0026 10$PC=7.E-5 4
170LU cG M from Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=3.0, but Ice imprecise due to
170LU2cG presence of contaminant.
170LU L 198.37 6 1+
170LU E 15 4 6.58 12
170LUS E CK=0.8140 8$CL=0.1422 6$CM+=0.04382 21
170LU G 28.38 100.90 M1+E2 0.079 30.9 6 C
170LUS G LC=23.9 5$MC=5.50 11$NC+=1.48 3
170LUS G NC=1.288 24$OC=0.182 4$PC=0.00917 16
170LU cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=1615:320:280:390:83:70 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG MR from L1/L3.
170LU G 99.93 109.00 M1+E2 0.61 3.60 6 C
170LUS G KC=2.51 4$LC=0.839 13$MC=0.200 3$NC+=0.0528 8
170LUS G NC=0.0465 7$OC=0.00612 9$PC=0.000183 3
170LU3 G EKC=2.51 (1969Tr02)$
170LU cG K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=2260:315:250:205:200:50 (1969Tr02).
170LU cG MR from |a(K)exp.
170LU G 153.9 1 0.30 M1+E2 0.84 0.914
170LUS G KC=0.670 10$LC=0.188 3$MC=0.0446 7$NC+=0.01183 17
170LUS G NC=0.01039 15$OC=0.001391 20$PC=4.72E-5 7
170LU4 G EKC=0.67 $
170LU cG MR from |a(K)exp.
170LU G 198.48 10 0.62 M1 0.529
170LUS G KC=0.442 7$LC=0.0676 10$MC=0.01520 22$NC+=0.00416 6
170LUS G NC=0.00359 5$OC=0.000532 8$PC=3.30E-5 5
170LU3 G EKC=0.60 $
170LU L 212.49 7 1-,2- Y
170LU E 3.2 10 7.23 14 Z
170LUS E CK=0.8136 8$CL=0.1425 6$CM+=0.04392 22
170LU G 47.80 1013.3 M1+E2 0.048 5.43 9 C
170LUS G LC=4.22 7$MC=0.953 15$NC+=0.260 4
170LUS G NC=0.225 4$OC=0.0330 5$PC=0.00197 3
170LU cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=4500:540:150:1030:110:300 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG MR from subshell ratios.
170LU G 168.0 1 1.80 E1 0.0898
170LUS G KC=0.0748 11$LC=0.01168 17$MC=0.00262 4$NC+=0.000701 10
170LUS G NC=0.000611 9$OC=8.59E-5 12$PC=4.33E-6 6
170LU3 G EKC AP 0.11$
170LU L 244.81 6 1- X
170LU E 1.0 3 7.70 14
170LUS E CK=0.8128 9$CL=0.1431 7$CM+=0.04415 24
170LU G 32.35 100.30 M1+E2 0.09 20.9 4
170LUS G LC=16.2 3$MC=3.72 7$NC+=1.002 18
170LUS G NC=0.873 16$OC=0.1235 22$PC=0.00622 11
170LU cG $L1:L2:M1=325:75:85 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG MR from subshell ratios.
170LU G 74.9 1 0.78
170LU G 80.13 102.80 M1 6.96 C
170LUS G KC=5.80 9$LC=0.901 13$MC=0.203 3$NC+=0.0554 8
170LUS G NC=0.0479 7$OC=0.00709 11$PC=0.000437 7
170LU3 G EKC=5.96
170LU cG $K:L1:L2:M1=1670:240:20:65 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG E 80.19 in tables 3 and 4 of 1969Tr02.
170LU G 146.32 10 5.20 E1 0.1290 C
170LUS G KC=0.1072 16$LC=0.01697 24$MC=0.00381 6$NC+=0.001016 15
170LUS G NC=0.000886 13$OC=0.0001238 18$PC=6.09E-6 9
170LU3 G EKC=0.077 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 5.6 {I6} in 1970Ch17.
170LU L 283.86 6 (2)- X
170LU E 0.42 18 8.32 20 1U?
170LUS E CK=0.781 3$CL=0.1660 20$CM+=0.0528 8
170LU G 39.06 10 0.011 APE2 218 5 2.5 AP
170LUS G L/T=0.760 10$M/T=0.188 5$N+/T=0.0481 13
170LUS G N/T=0.0430 12$O/T=0.00510 14$P/T=2.70E-6 7
170LU2 G L3/L2 AP 0.9 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI from I(|g+ce) and |a.
170LU cG TI based on I(ce(L23))|?1.90 (1969Tr02) and mult=E2.
170LU G 113.9 1 0.80 A ?
170LU G 119.15 10 3.80 M1(+E2) 1.3 LT 2.07 16
170LUS G KC=1.5 4$LC=0.45 17$MC=0.11 5$NC+=0.028 11
170LUS G NC=0.025 10$OC=0.0033 11$PC=0.00011 4
170LU4 G EKC=1.47
170LU cG $K:L1=560:75 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG M,MR from |a(L1)exp, allowing 30% uncertainty in |a(L1)exp.
170LU G 169.0 1 2.70 E1 0.0885
170LUS G KC=0.0737 11$LC=0.01150 17$MC=0.00258 4$NC+=0.000690 10
170LUS G NC=0.000601 9$OC=8.45E-5 12$PC=4.27E-6 6
170LU3 G EKC AP 0.074$
170LU G 185.4 1 0.95
170LU G 187.87 10 0.40 M1 0.616
170LUS G KC=0.515 8$LC=0.0788 12$MC=0.01772 25$NC+=0.00485 7
170LUS G NC=0.00419 6$OC=0.000621 9$PC=3.84E-5 6
170LU3 G EKC=0.55 $
170LU G 191.0 1 0.30
170LU L 304.14 10 0-,1-,2-
170LU cL E order of 481|g-208|g cascade not established, so E=577.28
170LU2cL {I16} is also possible. However, E=304 is favored by the tentative
170LU3cL placement of the 511|g from the 815 level.
170LU G 208.1 1 12.20 M1(+E2) 0.8 LE 0.42 5 C
170LUS G KC=0.34 5$LC=0.062 3$MC=0.0142 9$NC+=0.00383 20
170LUS G NC=0.00333 19$OC=0.000476 12$PC=2.5E-5 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.393
170LU cG $K:L1:M=480:53:18 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 18.8 {I19} in 1970Ch17 for (208.1|g+209.3|g).
170LU cG MR 0.3 {I+5-3} from K/M; 0.7 {I4} from L1/M.
170LU L 349.00 10 1+
170LU cL Configuration (|p 5/2[402])-(|n 7/2[633]) bandhead
170LU2cL suggested in 1988So04, but ((|p 1/2[541])+(|n 1/2[521])) suggested
170LU3cL in 1969Tr02.
170LU E 1.2 4 7.49 15
170LUS E CK=0.8094 12$CL=0.1456 9$CM+=0.0451 4
170LU G 349.0 1 4.90 M1 0.1140
170LUS G KC=0.0955 14$LC=0.01440 21$MC=0.00323 5$NC+=0.000884 13
170LUS G NC=0.000764 11$OC=0.0001134 16$PC=7.06E-6 10
170LU3 G EKC=0.129
170LU cG $K:L1=63:11 (1969Tr02)
170LU L 407.47 6 (0)- W
170LU E 6.0 17 6.71 14
170LUS E CK=0.8069 15$CL=0.1474 11$CM+=0.0457 4
170LU G 123.6 1 0.13 A ?
170LU G 162.65 10 6.20 [M1] 0.922 C
170LUS G KC=0.770 11$LC=0.1182 17$MC=0.0266 4$NC+=0.00727 11
170LUS G NC=0.00628 9$OC=0.000931 14$PC=5.76E-5 9
170LU4 G EKC=0.435
170LU cG $K:L1+L2=270:41 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG M,MR |a(L12)exp midway between E1 and E2,M1 theory; mult=M1+E2
170LU2cG from |a(K)exp, but E2 component inconsistent with placement;
170LU3cG inconsistency attributable to interference from ce(N)(99.9|g).
170LU G 209.3 1 2.30 (E1) 0.0509 C
170LUS G KC=0.0425 6$LC=0.00651 10$MC=0.001458 21$NC+=0.000391 6
170LUS G NC=0.000340 5$OC=4.83E-5 7$PC=2.53E-6 4
170LU3 G EKC AP 0.087
170LU G 242.75 10 0.36 M1 0.304
170LUS G KC=0.254 4$LC=0.0387 6$MC=0.00869 13$NC+=0.00238 4
170LUS G NC=0.00205 3$OC=0.000305 5$PC=1.89E-5 3
170LU3 G EKC=0.333 $
170LU G 291.4 1 4.80 E1 0.0222 C
170LUS G KC=0.0186 3$LC=0.00278 4$MC=0.000621 9$NC+=0.0001673 24
170LUS G NC=0.0001453 21$OC=2.09E-5 3$PC=1.147E-6 16
170LU3 G EKC=0.025 $
170LU G 308.9 1 9.4 E1 0.0192 C
170LUS G KC=0.01614 23$LC=0.00240 4$MC=0.000536 8$NC+=0.0001447 21
170LUS G NC=0.0001256 18$OC=1.81E-5 3$PC=1.001E-6 14
170LU3 G EKC=0.021 $
170LU cG RI$other: 12.4 {I12} in 1970Ch17.
170LU L 436.90 10(0+) ?
170LU cL Possible configuration (|p 1/2[541])-(|n 1/2[521])
170LU2cL (1969Tr02) not adopted; see comment in Adopted Levels.
170LU E 0.0088 24 9.50 13 ?
170LUS E CK=0.8055 17$CL=0.1484 12$CM+=0.0461 5
170LU G 436.9 1 (E0) 0.04 ?
170LU cG $K:L=3.3:0.6 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG ce(K)/ce=0.86
170LU cG I(ce)|?0.04 (1969Tr02) (from ce(K)+ce(L)=0.039).
170LU cG M ce is observed, but |g is not (1969Tr02).
170LU L 470.24 6 1- W
170LU E 3.0 9 6.91 14
170LUS E CK=0.8036 19$CL=0.1498 14$CM+=0.0466 5
170LU G 62.8 1 0.50 M1 2.36
170LUS G LC=1.83 3$MC=0.413 6$NC+=0.1128 17
170LUS G NC=0.0975 15$OC=0.01443 22$PC=0.000889 14
170LU2 G EL1C AP 1.7 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG $L1:M1 |? 85:20
170LU G 186.5 1 0.30
170LU G 225.5 1 3.90 M1 0.372 C
170LUS G KC=0.311 5$LC=0.0474 7$MC=0.01066 15$NC+=0.00291 4
170LUS G NC=0.00252 4$OC=0.000373 6$PC=2.32E-5 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.36$
170LU cG K:L12:M=140:30:8 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 7.1 {I7} in 1970Ch17.
170LU cG M from |a(K)exp.
170LU G 257.8 1 0.40 M1+E2 1.5 AP 0.1638 AP
170LUS G KC AP 0.1229$LC AP 0.0315$MC AP 0.00742$NC+ AP 0.00197
170LUS G NC AP 0.001729$OC AP 0.000233$PC AP 8.38E-6
170LU3 G EKC=0.13$
170LU G 425.7 1 3.96 E1
170LUS G CC=0.00904 13$KC=0.00761 11$LC=0.001107 16$MC=0.000247 4$NC+=6.69E-5 10
170LUS G NC=5.80E-5 9$OC=8.42E-6 12$PC=4.84E-7 7
170LU3 G EKC=0.0101$
170LU G 470.2 1 2.40 E1
170LUS G CC=0.00723 11$KC=0.00610 9$LC=0.000881 13$MC=0.000196 3$NC+=5.32E-5 8
170LUS G NC=4.61E-5 7$OC=6.71E-6 10$PC=3.90E-7 6
170LU3 G EKC=0.0092$
170LU L 785.46 6 1+
170LU E 43 12 4.96 18
170LUS E CK=0.756 14$CL=0.185 10$CM+=0.059 4
170LU G 315.4 1 0.49
170LU G 378.0 1 0.56
170LU G 481.3 1 16.7 E1 C
170LUS G CC=0.00686 10$KC=0.00579 9$LC=0.000835 12$MC=0.000186 3$NC+=5.05E-5 7
170LUS G NC=4.37E-5 7$OC=6.37E-6 9$PC=3.71E-7 6
170LU3 G EKC=0.0085 $
170LU cG $Mult, |a(K)exp: for doubly-placed |g.
170LU G 501.6 1 16.8 E1 C
170LUS G CC=0.00627 9$KC=0.00529 8$LC=0.000761 11$MC=0.0001697 24$NC+=4.60E-5 7
170LUS G NC=3.98E-5 6$OC=5.81E-6 9$PC=3.40E-7 5
170LU3 G EKC=0.0059
170LU cG $K:L=10:1.45 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG M$for multiply-placed |g.
170LU cG RI$other: 13.6 {I14} in 1970Ch17.
170LU G 540.7 1 11.1 E1 C
170LUS G CC=0.00533 8$KC=0.00450 7$LC=0.000644 9$MC=0.0001435 21$NC+=3.89E-5 6
170LUS G NC=3.37E-5 5$OC=4.93E-6 7$PC=2.90E-7 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.0066 $
170LU G 572.9 1 66.0 E1 C
170LUS G CC=0.00471 7$KC=0.00398 6$LC=0.000568 8$MC=0.0001265 18$NC+=3.43E-5 5
170LUS G NC=2.97E-5 5$OC=4.35E-6 6$PC=2.57E-7 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.0041
170LU cG $K:L=27:3.7 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 61 {I6} in 1970Ch17.
170LU G 587.1 1 1.20 M1 0.0294
170LUS G KC=0.0247 4$LC=0.00366 6$MC=0.000819 12$NC+=0.000224 4
170LUS G NC=0.000193 3$OC=2.88E-5 4$PC=1.81E-6 3
170LU3 G EKC=0.032 $
170LU G 608.8 1 0.75 A ?
170LU G 615.5 1 1.70 M1 0.0260
170LUS G KC=0.0219 3$LC=0.00324 5$MC=0.000725 11$NC+=0.000198 3
170LUS G NC=0.0001712 24$OC=2.55E-5 4$PC=1.599E-6 23
170LU3 G EKC=0.025 $
170LU G 620.7 1 81.7 E1 C
170LUS G CC=0.00398 6$KC=0.00337 5$LC=0.000478 7$MC=0.0001064 15$NC+=2.89E-5 4
170LUS G NC=2.50E-5 4$OC=3.66E-6 6$PC=2.19E-7 3
170LU3 G EKC=0.0035
170LU cG $K:L:M=28.8:3.6:1.0 (1969Tr02)
170LU cG RI$other: 87 {I9} in 1970Ch17.
170LU G 669.4 1 0.75 A ?
170LU G 740.8 1 0.83 E2(+M1) 1.5 AP 0.01009AP
170LUS G KC AP 0.00835$LC AP 0.001352$MC AP 0.000306$NC+ AP 8.31E-5
170LUS G NC AP 7.20E-5$OC AP 1.047E-5$PC AP 5.92E-7
170LU4 G EKC=0.0084 $
170LU G 785.5 1 0.20 A ?
170LU L 801.70 10 (1-)
170LU E 0.26 8 7.11 20 ?
170LUS E CK=0.749 17$CL=0.190 12$CM+=0.061 5
170LU G 686.7 1 1.17 ?
170LU5 G EKC=0.0128 $
170LU cG M from |a(K)exp, mult=M1(+E2) or E1+M2 with |d=0.55; from decay
170LU2cG scheme, |D|p=yes if mult(757|g)=E1.
170LU G 757.1 1 1.84 E1 ?
170LUS G CC=0.00266 4$KC=0.00226 4$LC=0.000317 5$MC=7.04E-5 10$NC+=1.91E-5 3
170LUS G NC=1.655E-5 24$OC=2.44E-6 4$PC=1.476E-7 21
170LU3 G EKC AP 0.0027
170LU G 801.7 1 1.20
170LU L 814.60 8(1)-
170LU E 0.18 5 7.21 20 ?
170LUS E CK=0.743 20$CL=0.194 14$CM+=0.063 6
170LU G 510.9 1 0.74 M1 0.0420 ?
170LUS G KC=0.0352 5$LC=0.00525 8$MC=0.001176 17$NC+=0.000322 5
170LUS G NC=0.000278 4$OC=4.13E-5 6$PC=2.59E-6 4
170LU3 G EKC=0.039
170LU G 770.2 1 0.56
170LU G 814.5 1 0.27
170LU L 923.20 15 2+
170LU E 0.084 23 6.8 5 ?
170LUS E CK=0.59 18$CL=0.30 13$CM+=0.11 5
170LU G 639.4 1 0.08 A ?
170LU G 746.5 1 0.38 M1+E2 1.7 AP 0.0095 AP
170LUS G CC AP 0.00947$KC AP 0.00782$LC AP 0.001279$MC AP 0.00029$NC+ AP 7.86E-5
170LUS G NC AP 6.82E-5$OC AP 9.88E-6$PC AP 5.52E-7
170LU4 G EKC AP 0.0079
170LU G 808.1 1 0.07 A ?
170LU G 878.7 1 0.13 A ?
170LU G 923.1 1 0.05 A ?