169YB 169LU EC DECAY (34.06 H) 1978BA73,1978BO39,1980BA0726NDS 202603
169YB H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. Shamsuzzoha Basunia$CIT=NDS 209, 1 (2026)$
169YB2 H CUT=1-Oct-2025$
169YB c Others:
169YBCc 1957Bo61, 1958Ke88, 1959Dz01, 1959Ha09, 1960Dz02, 1960Ha18, 1960Io01,
169YBDc 1960Io02, 1960Wi16, 1961Me05, 1961Pl02, 1962Dz05, 1963Tu01, 1964Dz02,
169YBEc 1964Dz06, 1968Lo10, 1969Ar23, 1970Ba09, 1970Bo06, 1970Dz11, 1971Ma74,
169YBFc 1972Bo69, 1972Dz02, 1973Bo38, 1977Ar17, 1977Bo31, 1980DuZP, 1980Bu24,
169YBGc 1991Dz04, 1982Da23.
169YB c
169YB c 1978Ba73: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin using Ge(Li) detectors
169YB2c (FWHM=0.5 keV at |?100 keV, 0.9 keV at |?200 keV, 2.1-2.7 keV at E|?1
169YB3c MeV), and ce data using a Si(Li) detector.
169YB c 1980Ba07: measured ce-|g coin; Ge(Li) detector (FWHM=3.5 keV at
169YB2c E|g=1332) and toroidal magnetic spectrometer.
169YB c 1977Bo31: measured |b{++} and ce spectra using iron-free toroidal
169YB2c spectrometer, resolution=1.1%.
169YB c 1977Ar17: magnetic spectrometer, 0.17% resolution; measured ce spectra.
169YB c {+169}Lu sources for |g and ce studies were from spallation of
169YB2c tantalum by protons (E(p)=660-680 MeV); chemical and mass separation.
169YB c The decay scheme is largely from 1978Bo39, incorporating
169YB2c photon data from 1977Ar17 and 1978Ba73 and |b{++} data from 1977Bo31.
169YB3c Additions and refinements to the scheme from 1978Bo39, based
169YB4c on ce-|g coin, were introduced in 1980Ba07 (16 additional levels,
169YB5c 5 levels from 1978Bo39 eliminated); the evaluation by 1988DzZW then
169YB6c proposed an additional 9 levels, along with the omission of 8
169YB6c of the levels newly proposed by 1980Ba07 and an additional 5
169YB7c of the levels proposed in 1978Bo39 (1541, 1566, 1707, 1708, 1954).
169YB8c Small changes have been made based on data of 1982Da23 (nuclear
169YB9c orientation) and several other studies; additional changes
169YBAc accommodate some of the recommendations from 1991DzZY or 1992Dz03.
169YB c For discussion of band structure and other possible levels of {+169}Yb
169YB2c that may be deduced from earlier decay data, see 1988DzZW, 1989Dz05,
169YB3c 1991Dz04, 1991DzZY, 1992Dz03, 1993Dz02 and 1995Dz02.
169YB cE |e+|b{++} feedings to excited states are from intensity
169YB2cE imbalance at each level; see comment on I|g normalization for
169YB3cE calculation of g.s. feeding. The allowed, |DN=2 feeding from a
169YB4cE 7/2[404] parent to the 7/2[633] g.s. of {+169}Yb is expected to be
169YB5cE strongly inhibited. Feeding to members of the 1/2[521] band
169YB6cE (K-forbidden) is expected to be weak also. For questionable placements
169YB7cE and for multiply-placed transitions with undivided intensity,
169YB8cE intensities of 1/2I|g |+ 1/2I|g have been assumed for each placement.
169YB9cE There is apparent and unexpected feeding of 0.25% {I11} to
169YBAcE 161.7 level, 0.23% {I9} to 269.7 level, 0.17% {I8} to 486.9 level,
169YBBcE and 0.19% {I2} to 720.0 level. This might be attributable to an
169YBCcE incomplete decay scheme (2.7% of |g intensity is unplaced).
169YB cE
169YB cE |b{++} spectrum (1977Bo31):
169YB tE
169YB2tE E|b I|b (relative to Ice(K)=1 for 191.2|g)
169YB3tE ----------- ----------------------------------
169YB4tE 1271 {I3} 0.55 {I5}
169YB5tE 900 {I+100-60} 0.028 {I11}
169YB6tE 670 {I50} 0.028 {I6}
169YB7tE 310 {I+60-40} 0.006 {I+4-3}
169YB tE
169YB tE $ The 1271 |b{++} group feeds the ground state.
169YB tE
169YB cE Other |b{++} spectrum: 1981By04 (used total-absorption
169YB2cE |g-ray spectroscopy to measure strength function).
169YB cG
169YB tG I(K x-ray) relative to I|g(960.6)=100 (1978Ba73)
169YB2tG
169YB3tG E(K x-ray) I(K x-ray)
169YB4tG ------ ------
169YB5tG 51.354 146 {I3}
169YB6tG 52.389 254 {I5}
169YB7tG 59.4 82 {I2}
169YB8tG 61.0 20.7 {I5}
169YB9tG
169YB cG |a(K)exp data given in comments are from 1978Ba73, unless
169YB2cG indicated to the contrary.
169YB cG E,RI From 1978Ba73, except where otherwise noted.
169YB cG E(N) Placement from 1988DzZW.
169YB cG E(ADFP),RI(D),M(P)$From 1980Ba07 and/or 1976Ba61.
169YB cG E(EH)$From Adopted Gammas.
169YB cG RI(GH) Deduced from relative photon branching ratios in (n,|g)
169YB2cG E=thermal and I|g for transitions common to both decay and (n,|g).
169YB cG M,MR From Adopted Gammas. Note that most of the multipolarities
169YB2cG and mixing ratios of the adopted dataset are taken from this dataset,
169YB2cG which are mainly based on |a(K)exp and/or |a(L)exp (1978Ba73). In
169YB3cG 1978Ba73, the measured photon and ce intensities were scaled by
169YB4cG assuming the most intense 889.8|g and 960.6|g are E1 and normalized
169YB5cG with the theory values, which yielded |a(K)(960|g)=0.00141 {I6}
169YB6cG (1978Ba73) cf. |a(K)=0.001372 {I19} (BrIcc v2.3e). For |d BriccMixing
169YB7cG v2.3b was used.
169YB cG MR(I)$From all the subshell ce data using the BriccMixing code v2.3b
169YB cG MR(K) From nuclear orientation (1982Da23).
169YB cL E From least -squares fit to E|g, excluding all questionably
169YB2cL or multiply-placed transitions as well as the 761|g (from 832 level),
169YB3cL 908.64|g (from 1070 level), 1151.70|g (from 1541 level) and 1676.46|g
169YB4cL (from 1954 level), each of which fits poorly. However,
169YB5cL even with these exclusions, three E|g are 4|s from their expected
169YB6cL values and four deviate by 3|s. It implies some of these transitions
169YB7cL may be misplaced in this decay scheme.
169YB cL J From Adopted Levels.
169YB cL BAND(A)$7/2[633] band.
169YB cL BAND(B)$1/2[521] band.
169YB cL BAND(C)$5/2[512] band.
169YB cL BAND(D)$5/2[523] band.
169YB cL BAND(E)$5/2[642] band.
169YB cL BAND(F)$3/2[521] band + K-2 |g vibration built on 1/2[521].
169YB cL BAND(G)$3/2[651] band + K-2 |g vibration built on 7/2[633].
169YB cL BAND(H)$1/2[510] band + K-2 |g vibration built on 5/2[512].
169YB cL BAND(Q)$7/2[514] band.
169YB cL BAND(S)$|b vibration band. Built on 7/2[633] g.s.; band assignment
169YB2cL from 1988DzZW.
169YB dG CC$From BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
169YB dE $LOGFT,CK,CL,CM,CN from BetaShape v2.4 (Jun-2024) 2019Mo35.
169YB dE $EAV,LOGFT from BetaShape v2.4 (Jun-2024) 2023Mo21.
169LU P 0.0 7/2+ 34.06 H 5 2293 3
169LU cP J,T from {+169}Lu Adopted Levels.
169LU cP QP$from 2021Wa16
169YB N 0.212 4 0.212 4 1.0 1.0
169YB PN 3
169YB cN NR from |S I|g(1+|a) (to g.s. plus 24.2 level) less
169YB2cN I|g(24.2)(1+|a)=89.5% {I10}, based on (%|e+%|b{++} to
169YB3cN g.s.)=10.5 {I10} [deduced value from the measured data of I(|b{++}
169YB4cN to g.s.)/I(191 ce(K))=0.55 {I5} (1977Bo31) and I(|e)/I(|b{++})=18.6
169YB5cN from theory]. This normalization and the decay-scheme yields
169YB6cN a |SI(K x-ray) value of |?527 compared with |SI(K x-ray)(exp)=503
169YBxcN {I6} (1978Ba73).
169YB G 357.10 20 0.20 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.024 {I17}.
169YB G 427.81 3 0.251 16 M1 0.0614 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.0533 35
169YBS G KC=0.0516 7$LC=0.00765 11$MC=0.001708 24
169YBS G NC=0.000401 6$OC=5.75E-5 8$PC=3.10E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.049 {I10}.
169YB cG Placed by 1992Dz03 from 1071 level to an otherwise unknown
169YB2cG 643 level deexcited only by two |g's already placed elsewhere.
169YB G 452.42 8 0.29 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.062 9
169YB cG Placed by 1992Dz03 from 1071 level to an otherwise unknown
169YB2cG 618 level deexcited by two |g's already placed elsewhere.
169YB G 492.25 26 0.20 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.043 {I25}
169YB G 550.2 3 0.30 15
169YB2 G %IG=0.064 32
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.024 {I14}
169YB G 632.8 3 0.20 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I8}
169YB cG 1978Ba73 proposed placement from 720 level, but
169YB2cG transition is not seen in {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal despite
169YB3cG intense population of the 720 level in that reaction.
169YB G 792.5 5 0.10 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.039 {I27}
169YB G 920.41 21 0.22 5 (E2) 0.00440 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.047 11
169YBS G KC=0.00364 5$LC=0.000588 8$MC=0.0001325 19
169YBS G NC=3.10E-5 4$OC=4.31E-6 6$PC=2.050E-7 29
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I20}
169YB G 984.09 14 0.75 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.159 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I13}
169YB G 1025.72 7 0.36 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.076 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I21}
169YB G 1133.44 5 0.80 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.170 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I6}
169YB G 1139.28 5 0.389 21M1 0.00521 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.083 5
169YBS G KC=0.00440 6$LC=0.000631 9$MC=0.0001403 20
169YBS G NC=3.30E-5 5$OC=4.74E-6 7$PC=2.59E-7 4$IPC=1.292E-6 18
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I11}
169YB G 1355.11 5 0.57 3 M1+E2 0.8 +6-4 0.0029 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.121 7
169YBS G KC=0.00243 32$LC=0.00035 4$MC=7.8E-5 10
169YBS G NC=1.83E-5 23$OC=2.62E-6 34$PC=1.41E-7 20$IPC=3.45E-5 22
169YB cG MR from |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I3}
169YB G 1419.68 13 0.18 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.038 9
169YB G 1425.54 22 0.27 6 M1 0.00309 4 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.057 13
169YBS G KC=0.00256 4$LC=0.000365 5$MC=8.11E-5 11
169YBS G NC=1.904E-5 27$OC=2.74E-6 4$PC=1.504E-7 21$IPC=6.09E-5 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I15}
169YB cG Placed by 1988DzZW from 1617 level, but absence of this
169YB2cG |g in (n,|g) E=thermal (where many transitions from this level are
169YB3cG observed) makes that placement unlikely. A |g of similar energy
169YB4cG deexcites a 1555 level in (n,|g) E=thermal.
169YB G 1568.66 18 0.11 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.023 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I25}
169YB G 1575.76 7 0.37 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.079 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I9}
169YB G 1584.70 9 0.60 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.127 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I5}
169YB G 1626.12 14 0.098 20
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 4
169YB G 1671.60 10 0.234 22
169YB2 G %IG=0.050 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I12}
169YB G 1702 1 0.10 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 11
169YB G 1737.03 26 0.180 23
169YB2 G %IG=0.038 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp<0.005
169YB G 1746.78 14 0.27 4 M1 2.08E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.057 9
169YBS G KC=0.001582 22$LC=0.0002239 31$MC=4.97E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.168E-5 16$OC=1.681E-6 24$PC=9.25E-8 13$IPC=0.0002103 29
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I16} (1978Ba73)
169YB cG Placed by 1988DzZW from 1909 level, but adopted J|p=5/2+ for
169YB2cG that level would imply an M3 transition.
169YB G 1790.55 10 0.262 11
169YB2 G %IG=0.0556 25
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0011 {I6}
169YB G 1833.41 11 0.133 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.0282 22
169YB G 1850.87 10 0.102 20
169YB2 G %IG=0.022 4
169YB G 1862.44 9 0.626 24
169YB2 G %IG=0.133 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I5}
169YB G 1867.06 12 0.086 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.0183 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I5}
169YB G 1916.1 4 0.042 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.0089 21
169YB G 1920.81 17 0.104 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.0221 20
169YB G 1947.33 22 0.050 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.0106 17
169YB G 1969.80 20 0.146 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.0310 22
169YB G 1985.08 12 0.427 14
169YB2 G %IG=0.0906 34
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00073 {I21}
169YB G 2025.46 11 0.493 23
169YB2 G %IG=0.105 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I8}
169YB G 2048.99 8 0.335 22
169YB2 G %IG=0.071 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I15}
169YB G 2056.17 5 1.23 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.261 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0021 {I11}
169YB G 2070.85 11 0.130 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.0276 12
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I6}
169YB G 2088.69 14 0.043 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.0091 7
169YB G 2112.0 4 0.036 11
169YB2 G %IG=0.0076 23
169YB G 2114.33 26 0.070 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.0149 9
169YB G 2122.47 10 0.84 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.178 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00112 {I20}
169YB G 2139.39 17 0.31 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.066 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00078 {I22}
169YB G 2141.88 20 0.063 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.0134 17
169YB G 2148.27 17 0.106 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.0225 13
169YB G 2158.05 25 0.116 25
169YB2 G %IG=0.025 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I9}
169YB G 2161.18 10 0.30 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.064 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0009 {I5}.
169YB G 2191.49 20 0.068 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.0144 9
169YB L 0.0 7/2+ 32.016 D 8 A
169YB cL T from Adopted Levels.
169YB E 0.51 510 18.002 42 10.5 10
169YBS E EAV=578.1 13$CK=0.7881 8$CL=0.12379 18$CM+=0.03938 11
169YB cE E other: 2293 {I3} from E|b+=1271 {I3} (1977Bo31).
169YB cE TI,IE deduced from I|b(1271|b)/Ice(K)(191.2|g)=0.55 {I5}
169YBxcE (1977Bo31).
169YB L 24.210 8 1/2- 46 S 2 BM
169YB cL T from Adopted Levels.
169YB G 24.20 2 E3 2.58E5 460.0 22
169YBS G LC=1.847E5 27$MC=5.80E4 9
169YBS G NC=1.355E4 20$OC=1394 21$PC=0.681 10
169YB cG E from 1970Ba09.
169YB cG TI from intensity balance at 24.2 level; |e+|b{++} feeding to
169YB2cG this level is not expected (|DJ=3, |D|p=yes).
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios:
169YB2cG L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:(M4+M5):N:O=|<50:500
169YB3cG 50:600 {I50}:<8:140 {I15}:160 {I15}:29 {I3}:71 {I7}:6 {I2} (1977Ar17).
169YB L 70.880 5 9/2+ A
169YB G 70.880 6 7.27 13M1+E2 -0.31 +15-269.4 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.543 35
169YB2 G A2=+0.80 22 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=7.1 9$LC=1.8 11$MC=0.42 29
169YBS G NC=0.10 7$OC=0.013 7$PC=0.00043 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=6.4 {I9} (1978Ba73), 7.2 {I11} (1977Ar17);
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1220 {I150}:170 {I20}:80 {I15}:50 {I10}:37
169YB3cG {I7}:19 {I3}:11.5 {I20} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3=100:46.9 {I13}:34.4 {I7}
169YBxcG (1987BaZB).
169YB L 86.927 7 3/2- B
169YB G 62.730 14 2.79 11M1+E2 0.58 3 14.96 27 I
169YB2 G %IG=0.592 23
169YBS G KC=8.34 21$LC=5.08 27$MC=1.23 7
169YBS G NC=0.281 15$OC=0.0337 17$PC=0.000530 13
169YB cG |a(L)exp=4.7 {I3} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=
169YB2cG 75 {I7}:130 {I15}:130 {I10}:|?20:|?40:|?40:19 {I2} (1977Ar17);
169YB3cG L1:L2:L3=100:161 {I5}:164 {I5} (1987BaZB).
169YB L 99.250 6 5/2- B
169YB G 12.31 2 0.078 17 M1+E2 0.028 +11-9 3.1E2 5 G
169YB2 G %IG=0.017 4
169YBS G LC=243 35$MC=56 9
169YBS G NC=13.0 19$OC=1.79 22$PC=0.0825 12
169YB cG E from 1973Bo38.
169YB cG RI deduced from Ice(L)=19.3 {I43} (1977Ar17) and |a(L)(theory).
169YB cG M,MR from ce subshell ratios: L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N1:N2:O=
169YB2cG 350 {I100}:60 {I15}:55 {I25}:70 {I16}:12 {I2}:10 {I3}:17 {I3}:3
169YBxcG {I1}:3.3 {I10} (1977Ar17).
169YB G 75.036 6 1.30 3 E2 10.06 14
169YB2 G %IG=0.276 8
169YBS G KC=1.620 23$LC=6.44 9$MC=1.591 22
169YBS G NC=0.362 5$OC=0.0412 6$PC=8.18E-5 11
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38, 1977Ar17).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=1.4 {I3} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O=
169YB2cG 50 {I9}:5.0:83:85:1.33:26.6:26.6:13.3:3.3 (1973Bo38);
169YB3cG K:L1:L2:L3=|<50:5.5 {I5}:95 {I3}:100 (1977Ar17).
169YB L 161.645 6 11/2+ A
169YB G 90.764 4 2.38 5 M1+E2 -0.28 2 4.48 6 I
169YB2 G %IG=0.505 14
169YB2 G A2=+0.79 53 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=3.55 6$LC=0.721 23$MC=0.166 6
169YBS G NC=0.0386 13$OC=0.00521 14$PC=0.0002156 35
169YB cG MR sign from nuclear orientation (|d=-0.3 {I+3-6}, 1982Da23);
169YB2cG |d<0 supported by |d=-0.40 {I9} from (|a,2n|g).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=3.0 {I3} (1978Ba73), 3.0 {I6} (1977Ar17);
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O= 66 {I11}:10:2.5:<0.83:2.5:0.66:0.83:0.17
169YB3cG (1973Bo38); K:L1:L2:L3=190 {I15}:27 {I2}:8.1 {I10}:4.5 {I7} (1977Ar17).
169YB G 161.659 15 0.74 4 E2 0.555 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.157 9
169YB2 G A2=-0.43 19 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.300 4$LC=0.1948 27$MC=0.0475 7
169YBS G NC=0.01087 15$OC=0.001287 18$PC=1.337E-5 19
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.38 {I10} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=
169YB2cG 76 {I16}:6.6:20:15:1.7:5:3.3:2.5 (1973Bo38).
169YB L 191.216 5 5/2- 3.35 NS 15 C
169YB cL T from |g|g(t) (1968Lo10).
169YB E 0.046 171.6 68.73 16 1.6 6
169YBS E EAV=494.4 13$CK=0.8042 6$CL=0.12683 16$CM+=0.04036 11
169YB G 91.965 3 2.56 5 M1(+E2) -0.19 5 4.30 6 I
169YB2 G %IG=0.543 14
169YB2 G A2=-0.24 36 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=3.51 7$LC=0.62 4$MC=0.140 10
169YBS G NC=0.0328 22$OC=0.00454 24$PC=0.000214 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=3.63 {I8} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=
169YB2cG 133 {I20}:16.6:3.3:<0.66:5.0:0.83:1.33 (1973Bo38);
169YB3cG K:L1:L2=240 {I30}:31 {I4}:4.3 {I15} (1977Ar17).
169YB cG MR sign from nuclear orientation (|d=-0.2 {I+4-3}, 1982Da23)
169YB G 104.293 9 2.04 7 M1(+E2) -0.55 +65-202.93 7 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.433 17
169YB2 G A2=+1.04 90 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=2.14 35$LC=0.61 22$MC=0.14 6
169YBS G NC=0.033 13$OC=0.0043 13$PC=0.000127 25
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=2.0 {I4} (1978Ba73), 1.9 {I3} (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:M=
169YB2cG 140 {I10}:18.3 {I14}:1.7 {I3}:|?4.6 (1977Ar17); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N:O=
169YB3cG 108 {I20}:19.9:2.0:0.20:6.64:0.66:1.66:0.50 (1973Bo38).
169YB G 191.217 5 88 2 E1+M2 -0.017 16 0.0631 25 K
169YB2 G %IG=18.7 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.054 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0527 19$LC=0.0081 4$MC=0.00181 10
169YBS G NC=0.000419 23$OC=5.70E-5 33$PC=2.57E-6 16
169YB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.046 {I10} (1978Ba73) and
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O= 108 {I20}:18.6:2.7:2.7:5:0.7:0.7:0.15:0.35
169YB3cG (1973Bo38). |a(K)exp=0.59 {I9} (1977Ar17) is presumed to be erroneous.
169YB cG MR -0.058 {I9} from nuclear orientation (1982Da23) but
169YB2cG <0.042 from |a(K)exp=0.046 {I10} (1978Ba73). B(M2)(W.u.)|<1.0 (from
169YB3cG RUL) implies |d|<0.033, so evaluator adopts |d=-0.017 {I16}.
169YB L 243.827 7 7/2- B
169YB E 0.01 LT0.46 LT9.2 GT 0.47 LT ?
169YBS E EAV=471.4 13$CK=0.8077 5$CL=0.12754 16$CM+=0.04060 11
169YB G 144.576 7 2.41 6 M1+E2 +0.52 +12-9 1.104 32 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.512 16
169YB2 G A2=-0.53 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.86 5$LC=0.186 13$MC=0.0430 35
169YBS G NC=0.0100 8$OC=0.00133 8$PC=5.12E-5 34
169YB cG MR$others: 0.42 {I3} (ce subshell ratios, 1987BaZB), 0.7 {I5} (|a(K),
169YB2cG 1978Ba73), 0.25 {I5} (ce subshell ratios, 1973Bo38).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.80 {I15} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=
169YB2cG 515 {I90}:73:11.6:5:18.3:3.3:5.0 (1973Bo38);
169YB3cG L1:L2:L3=100:27.0 {I22}:16.7 {I22} (1987BaZB).
169YB G 156.901 4 6.01 11E2 0.616 9
169YB2 G %IG=1.276 33
169YB2 G A2=-0.503 53 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.326 5$LC=0.2216 31$MC=0.0541 8
169YBS G NC=0.01238 17$OC=0.001461 20$PC=1.443E-5 20
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.28 {I5} (1978Ba73), 0.30 {I4} (1977Ar17);
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O=
169YB3cG 432 {I83}:50:99.6:66.4:11.6:2.5:16.6:13.3:3.3 (1973Bo38).
169YB L 264.272 8 9/2- B
169YB E 0.008570LT0.37143 LT9.3 GT 0.38 LT ?
169YBS E EAV=462.5 13$CK=0.80896 49$CL=0.12780 16$CM+=0.04069 11
169YB G 20.44 2 0.035 6M1 59.0 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.0074 13
169YBS G LC=45.9 7$MC=10.30 15
169YBS G NC=2.417 35$OC=0.345 5$PC=0.01826 26
169YB cG E from 1973Bo38.
169YB cG RI deduced from Ice(M1)=0.33 {I6} (1977Ar17) and |a(M1)(theory).
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17); M1+E2 with |d<0.055
169YB2cG (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23).
169YB cG L1:M1:M2=36 {I6}:8.0 {I13}: |<1.6 (1977Ar17).
169YB G 165.020 7 8.41 16E2 0.517 7
169YB2 G %IG=1.79 5
169YB2 G A2=-0.472 44 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.284 4$LC=0.1783 25$MC=0.0434 6
169YBS G NC=0.00995 14$OC=0.001179 17$PC=1.268E-5 18
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1973Bo38).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.24 {I5} (1978Ba73), 0.28 {I4} (1977Ar17);
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O=
169YB3cG 531 {I90}:55:222:178:13.3:56.4:50:25.0:6.6 (1973Bo38).
169YB L 269.628 19 13/2+ A
169YB G 108.004 25 0.353 18M1+E2 -0.29 4 2.68 4 I
169YB2 G %IG=0.075 4
169YBS G KC=2.15 4$LC=0.410 18$MC=0.094 5
169YBS G NC=0.0219 10$OC=0.00299 11$PC=0.0001304 28
169YB cG MR sign from |d in Adopted Gammas dataset.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=1.6 {I3} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=
169YB2cG 150 {I23}:23.2:8.3:2.3:6.6:1.7:1.7 (1973Bo38).
169YB G 198.771 5 0.18 4[E2] 0.274 4 H
169YB2 G %IG=0.038 9
169YBS G KC=0.1679 24$LC=0.0815 11$MC=0.01971 28
169YBS G NC=0.00452 6$OC=0.000545 8$PC=7.84E-6 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.032 {I15}, deduced from I|g and I(ce(K))=0.0058
169YB2cG {I25} (1978Ba73); inconsistent with |a(K)(theory)=0.168 for required E2
169YB3cG multipolarity.
169YB L 278.594 6 7/2- C
169YB E 0.024 91.08 408.85 16 1.1 4
169YBS E EAV=456.2 13$CK=0.80980 48$CL=0.12798 16$CM+=0.04074 11
169YB G 14.22 4 1.8 LT
169YBL G FL=264.272
169YB cG E from 1973Bo38.
169YB cG I(|g+ce)(14.2|g) cannot exceed 0.9 {I9} and I(|g+ce)(34.8|g)
169YB2cG cannot exceed 1.5 {I7} based on intensity balances at the 243.8 and
169YBxcG 264.3 levels.
169YB G 34.79 4 M1+E2 0.022 AP 12.36 AP 2.2 LTI
169YBS G LC AP 9.62$MC AP 2.158
169YBS G NC AP 0.506$OC AP 0.0720$PC AP 0.00378
169YB cG E from 1973Bo38.
169YB cG TI See comment with 14.2|g.
169YB cG M from ce subshell ratios (1977Ar17).
169YB cG L1:L2=11.6 {I13}:|?1.2 (1977Ar17).
169YB G 87.377 4 10.50 19M1+E2 -0.23 2 5.00 7 I
169YB2 G %IG=2.23 6
169YBS G KC=4.02 6$LC=0.764 24$MC=0.175 6
169YBS G NC=0.0407 14$OC=0.00557 15$PC=0.000245 4
169YB cG MR sign from |d=-0.14 {I+7-24} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu24).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=3.5 {I5} (1978Ba73), 4.0 {I5} (1977Ar17);
169YB2cG K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3= 1050 {I100}:160 {I12}:32 {I3}:24 {I3}:32 {I3}:8.7
169YB3cG {I7}:5.7 {I10} (1977Ar17); L1:L2:L3=100:21.3 {I9}:16.4 {I5} (1987BaZB).
169YB G 207.727 25 1.84 6 E1(+M2) -0.09 +14-160.07 11 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.391 15
169YB2 G A2=+0.02 21 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.06 9$LC=0.009 19$MC=0.002 4
169YBS G NC=5.E-4 11$OC=7.E-5 15$PC=3.E-6 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.034 {I17}
169YB G 278.60 4 0.56 4 (E1) 0.0239133
169YB2 G %IG=0.119 9
169YBS G KC=0.02009 28$LC=0.00298 4$MC=0.000663 9
169YBS G NC=0.0001542 22$OC=2.130E-5 30$PC=1.011E-6 14
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.022 {I11}
169YB L 389.523 7 9/2- C
169YB E 0.0112 440.78 318.94 17 0.79 31
169YBS E EAV=407.8 13$CK=0.81537 41$CL=0.12925 16$CM+=0.04117 11
169YB G 110.924 4 7.48 18M1+E2 -0.17 +4-3 2.499 35 I
169YB2 G %IG=1.59 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.60 11 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=2.061 32$LC=0.341 10$MC=0.0769 24
169YBS G NC=0.0180 5$OC=0.00253 6$PC=0.0001255 21
169YB cG MR sign from -0.17 {I+7-8} (1982Da23 - nuclear orientation).
169YB2cG Other values: -0.28 {I+9-8} (|g|g(|q), 1980Bu24), -0.11 {I+16-25} (from
169YB3cG {+167}Er(|a,2n|g)).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=1.55 {I25} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N:O=
169YB2cG 32 {I5}:4.2:0.75:0.22:1.0:0.18:0.07:0.25:0.066 (1973Bo38).
169YB G 198.26 12 3.28 11E2 0.277 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.696 26
169YBS G KC=0.1691 24$LC=0.0824 12$MC=0.01993 28
169YBS G NC=0.00457 7$OC=0.000551 8$PC=7.89E-6 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.13 {I3} (1978Ba73); K:L2:L3:M1:M2=
169YB2cG 111 {I20}:30:21.6:8.3:5 (1973Bo38).
169YB G 227.892 18 0.92 17[E1] 0.0396 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.20 4
169YBS G KC=0.0332 5$LC=0.00499 7$MC=0.001114 16
169YBS G NC=0.000259 4$OC=3.55E-5 5$PC=1.637E-6 23
169YB G 318.70 7 0.384 18(E1) 0.0171924
169YB2 G %IG=0.082 4
169YBS G KC=0.01447 20$LC=0.002123 30$MC=0.000473 7
169YBS G NC=0.0001100 15$OC=1.527E-5 21$PC=7.37E-7 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.024 {I12}
169YB G 389.57 5 0.63 3 (E1) 0.0106615
169YB2 G %IG=0.134 7
169YB2 G A2=+0.24 38 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00899 13$LC=0.001303 18$MC=0.000290 4
169YBS G NC=6.75E-5 9$OC=9.43E-6 13$PC=4.66E-7 7
169YB cG M |d=+0.03 {I21} (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests
169YB2cG possible M2 admixture.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.013 {I2}
169YB L 487.031 14 (11/2-) B
169YB G 222.70 6 0.14 7 D
169YB2 G %IG=0.030 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.07 {I5} is inconsistent with the expected
169YB2CG multipolarity for a (11/2-) to 9/2- transition.
169YB G 243.207 12 0.92 20(E2) 0.1419 20
169YB2 G %IG=0.20 4
169YBS G KC=0.0947 13$LC=0.0362 5$MC=0.00868 12
169YBS G NC=0.001996 28$OC=0.0002452 34$PC=4.63E-6 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.074 {I26}
169YB L 512.039 17 (13/2)- B
169YB G 247.766 15 0.15 3E2 0.1337 19 F
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 6
169YBS G KC=0.0899 13$LC=0.0337 5$MC=0.00806 11
169YBS G NC=0.001855 26$OC=0.0002283 32$PC=4.42E-6 6
169YB cG RI see comment with 247.2|g from 1168 level.
169YB L 523.066 7 11/2- C
169YB G 133.540 5 0.843 22M1+E2 -0.16 4 1.469 21 I
169YB2 G %IG=0.179 6
169YB2 G A2=+0.32 38 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=1.218 20$LC=0.195 4$MC=0.0439 11
169YBS G NC=0.01029 25$OC=0.001454 29$PC=7.41E-5 13
169YB cG MR sign from -0.02 {I22} (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=1.3 {I2} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:N=
169YB2cG 300 {I50}:36:6.6:1.3:8.3:1.7:2.5 (1973Bo38).
169YB G 244.474 5 0.82 15(E2) 0.1395 20 E
169YB2 G %IG=0.174 32
169YBS G KC=0.0934 13$LC=0.0355 5$MC=0.00850 12
169YBS G NC=0.001955 27$OC=0.0002404 34$PC=4.57E-6 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.12 {I5}
169YB L 569.837 10 5/2- D
169YB E 0.0061 50.98 88.752 36 0.99 8
169YBS E EAV=328.9 13$CK=0.82117 34$CL=0.13091 16$CM+=0.04174 11
169YB G 291.234 19 1.90 7 M1+E2 -0.10 9 0.1696 33 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.403 17
169YB2 G A2=+0.27 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.1421 29$LC=0.02141 31$MC=0.00479 7
169YBS G NC=0.001124 16$OC=0.0001608 24$PC=8.58E-6 19
169YB cG MR sign from |d=-0.17 {I+6-8} from |g|g(|q) (1980Bu24). Other
169YB2cG |d: +0.10 {I9} (1982Da23, nuclear orientation).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.18 {I4}
169YB G 378.632 11 9.01 23M1+E2 -0.41 +19-250.078 8
169YB2 G %IG=1.91 6
169YB2 G A2=-0.382 57 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.065 7$LC=0.0101 6$MC=0.00226 11
169YBS G NC=0.000531 28$OC=7.5E-5 5$PC=3.9E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.065 {I5}
169YB cG MR$sign from nuclear orientation (|d=-0.04 {I6}, 1982Da23)
169YB G 470.47 3 0.46 5 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.098 11
169YBL G FL=99.250
169YB cG RI deduced from total I|g=2.33 {I13} and requirement that
169YB2cG I(470|g from 570 level)/I(379|g) and I(470|g from 749 level)/I(360|g)
169YB3cG should be identical in |e decay and (n,|g) E=thermal.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.042 {I10} for doublet.
169YB G 482.84 4 0.63 3 M1 0.0448 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.134 7
169YBS G KC=0.0377 5$LC=0.00557 8$MC=0.001242 17
169YBS G NC=0.000292 4$OC=4.18E-5 6$PC=2.257E-6 32
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.038 {I7}
169YB G 569.79 4 0.62 3 [E1] 0.00457 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.132 7
169YBS G KC=0.00387 5$LC=0.000547 8$MC=0.0001213 17
169YBS G NC=2.83E-5 4$OC=4.00E-6 6$PC=2.048E-7 29
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.008 {I4}
169YB L 590.67 3 (5/2)+ E
169YB E 0.00232 450.42 89.11 8 0.42 8
169YBS E EAV=319.8 13$CK=0.82161 34$CL=0.13107 16$CM+=0.04179 11
169YB G 519.788 15 0.080 15[E2] 0.0161723 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.0170 32
169YB3 G FLAG=H
169YBS G KC=0.01278 18$LC=0.00263 4$MC=0.000606 8
169YBS G NC=0.0001408 20$OC=1.875E-5 26$PC=7.03E-7 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0096 {I28} for doublet.
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas.
169YB G 590.664 28 3.00 16M1+E2 +0.34 +8-7 0.0252 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.64 4
169YB2 G A2=+0.572 79 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0211 7$LC=0.00314 8$MC=0.000702 18
169YBS G NC=0.000165 4$OC=2.36E-5 6$PC=1.26E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3}
169YB L 647.34 3 7/2+ E
169YB E 0.00210 280.53 78.98 6 0.53 7
169YBS E EAV=294.9 13$CK=0.82258 33$CL=0.13151 16$CM+=0.04195 11
169YB G 576.42 4 3.01 25M1+E2 +0.09 4 0.0283 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.64 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.292 54 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.02381 35$LC=0.00350 5$MC=0.000780 11
169YBS G NC=0.0001833 27$OC=2.63E-5 4$PC=1.420E-6 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.025 {I3}
169YB G 647.33 18 1.23 9 M1+E2 +0.5 +6-4 0.019 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.261 20
169YB2 G A2=-0.59 15 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0158 35$LC=0.0024 4$MC=0.00053 9
169YBS G NC=0.000124 21$OC=1.77E-5 33$PC=9.3E-7 22
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.016 {I2}
169YB L 647.847 11 7/2- D
169YB E 0.00815 372.05 78.391 16 2.06 7
169YBS E EAV=294.7 13$CK=0.82259 33$CL=0.13151 16$CM+=0.04195 11
169YB G 258.331 19 1.45 6 M1+E2 +1.4 +19-6 0.157 32
169YB2 G %IG=0.308 14
169YB2 G A2=+0.34 32 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.120 32$LC=0.0290 5$MC=0.00678 11
169YBS G NC=0.001571 22$OC=0.000205 8$PC=6.7E-6 22
169YB cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.12 {I3} (1978Ba73). Sign of the |d from
169YBxcG |d=+0.12 {I+25-21} in nuclear orientation (1982Da23).
169YB G 369.251 15 3.58 9 M1(+E2) -0.02 5 0.0904 13 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.760 23
169YB2 G A2=-0.419 34 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0759 11$LC=0.01131 16$MC=0.00253 4
169YBS G NC=0.000593 8$OC=8.50E-5 12$PC=4.57E-6 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.076 {I6}
169YB G 383.59 5 0.32 5 [M1,E2] 0.059 23
169YB2 G %IG=0.068 11
169YBS G KC=0.048 21$LC=0.0085 17$MC=0.00195 34
169YBS G NC=0.00045 8$OC=6.2E-5 14$PC=2.8E-6 13
169YB G 403.98 4 0.53 4 (M1) 0.0713699
169YB2 G %IG=0.112 9
169YBS G KC=0.0599 8$LC=0.00890 12$MC=0.001988 28
169YBS G NC=0.000467 7$OC=6.69E-5 9$PC=3.60E-6 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.056 {I6}
169YB G 456.621 27 3.05 14M1+E2 -0.24 +10-9 0.0502 15
169YB2 G %IG=0.647 32
169YB2 G A2=+0.49 16 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0421 13$LC=0.00631 14$MC=0.001409 31
169YBS G NC=0.000331 7$OC=4.73E-5 11$PC=2.52E-6 8
169YB cG MR from 1980Bu24 (|g|g(|q)). Other values: -0.09 {I9} (1982Da23
169YB2cG - nuclear orientation) , 0.5 {I4} from |a(K)exp in 1978Ba73.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.038 {I6}
169YB G 548.70 5 1.46 8 M1+E2 +0.53 +13-100.0283 16 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.310 18
169YB2 G A2=-0.54 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0236 14$LC=0.00361 16$MC=0.000808 33
169YBS G NC=0.000189 8$OC=2.69E-5 12$PC=1.40E-6 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.027 {I3}
169YB G 560.73 7 0.42 3 (E2) 0.0134019 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.089 7
169YBF G FLAG=G
169YBS G KC=0.01069 15$LC=0.002105 29$MC=0.000484 7
169YBS G NC=0.0001126 16$OC=1.511E-5 21$PC=5.91E-7 8
169YB cG RI deduced from total I|g=0.533 {I16} and I|g=0.115 {I26} for
169YB2cG 659.6-level placement.
169YB cG M,MR M1+E2, |d=1.1 {I3} from |a(K)exp=0.021 {I2} for doublet
169YB2cG dominated by this transition; other component is known from (n,|g)
169YB3cG to have |a(K)exp>|a(K)(M1) so mult=E2(+M1) is likely for this
169YB4cG transition. An M1 component would be inconsistent with level scheme.
169YB L 659.52 12 3/2- F
169YB E 1.7E-4 90.27 1510.25 24 0.27 15 1U
169YBS E EAV=304.3 13$CK=0.81452 37$CL=0.13979 19$CM+=0.04508 12
169YB G 560.73 7 0.115 26(M1) 0.0305 4 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.024 6
169YBL G FL=99.250
169YB3 G FLAG=G
169YBS G KC=0.0257 4$LC=0.00377 5$MC=0.000841 12
169YBS G NC=0.0001975 28$OC=2.83E-5 4$PC=1.532E-6 21
169YB cG M$from Adopted Gammas. |a(K)exp=0.021 {I2} for doublet (1978Ba73).
169YB G 572.59 12 0.46 6 M1+E2 -0.7 +4-6 0.024 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.098 13
169YB2 G A2=+0.48 35 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.020 4$LC=0.0031 5$MC=0.00068 10
169YBS G NC=0.000160 24$OC=2.3E-5 4$PC=1.16E-6 27
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.023 {I6}
169YB G 635.410 15 1.3 LT M1 0.0221831 &
169YBS G KC=0.01868 26$LC=0.00273 4$MC=0.000609 9
169YBS G NC=0.0001431 20$OC=2.053E-5 29$PC=1.112E-6 16
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas.
169YB cG RI deduced from I|g(635.4|g+636.1|g)=2.72 {I9} and
169YB2cG I|g(636.1|g)=2.1 {I7}.
169YB cG |a(K)exp>0.03 from I(ce(K)) (1978Ba73) and I|g here.
169YB L 707.03 5 9/2+ E
169YB E 0.00215 440.80 168.77 9 0.80 16
169YBS E EAV=268.7 13$CK=0.82328 33$CL=0.13193 16$CM+=0.04210 11
169YB G 545.43 7 1.57 10M1+E2 -0.12 7 0.0325 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.333 22
169YB2 G A2=-0.011 95 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0273 5$LC=0.00403 7$MC=0.000898 15
169YBS G NC=0.0002109 35$OC=3.02E-5 5$PC=1.631E-6 31
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.027 {I3}
169YB G 636.11 7 2.1 7 E2(+M1) 0.016 6 H
169YB2 G %IG=0.45 15
169YBS G KC=0.013 5$LC=0.0021 6$MC=4.7E-4 13
169YBS G NC=1.11E-4 32$OC=1.6E-5 5$PC=7.8E-7 33
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas.
169YB cG M,MR |a(K)exp=0.008 from I(ce(K)) (1978Ba73) and I|g here, implies
169YB2cG dominant E2 component.
169YB L 720.00 8 3/2+ G
169YB G 720.00 8 0.89 8 E2 0.0074710
169YB2 G %IG=0.189 17
169YBS G KC=0.00610 9$LC=0.001070 15$MC=0.0002433 34
169YBS G NC=5.67E-5 8$OC=7.77E-6 11$PC=3.41E-7 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0077 {I10}
169YB L 722.21 5 5/2- F
169YB G 622.96 5 0.71 6 M1(+E2) 0.017 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.151 13
169YB2 G A2=-0.58 26 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.014 6$LC=0.0022 7$MC=5.0E-4 14
169YBS G NC=1.17E-4 34$OC=1.6E-5 5$PC=8.2E-7 35
169YB cG M |a(K)exp consistent with pure M1; -0.10|<|d|<+2.07 (nuclear
169YB2cG orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.022 {I3}
169YB G 635.410 15 1.3 LTM1 0.0221831 &
169YBL G FL=86.927
169YBS G KC=0.01868 26$LC=0.00273 4$MC=0.000609 9
169YBS G NC=0.0001431 20$OC=2.053E-5 29$PC=1.112E-6 16
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas.
169YB L 748.923 23 (9/2)- D
169YB E 0.00127 200.64 108.84 7 0.64 10
169YBS E EAV=250.2 13$CK=0.82360 33$CL=0.13222 16$CM+=0.04220 11
169YB G 225.86 3 0.30 15
169YB2 G %IG=0.064 32
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.06 {I5} is inconsistent with the expected
169YB2CG multipolarity for a (9/2)- to 11/2- transition.
169YB G 359.38 7 0.71 4 (M1+E2) 1.5 +15-6 0.060 13
169YB2 G %IG=0.151 9
169YB2 G A2=-0.33 23 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.048 12$LC=0.0097 9$MC=0.00223 17
169YBS G NC=0.00052 4$OC=6.9E-5 8$PC=2.7E-6 8
169YB cG MR other value: -0.44|<|d|<+2.04 (nuclear orientation,
169YB2cG 1982Da23).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.049 {I11}
169YB G 470.47 3 1.87 26M1 0.0479 7 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.40 6
169YBL G FL=278.594
169YBS G KC=0.0403 6$LC=0.00596 8$MC=0.001330 19
169YBS G NC=0.000312 4$OC=4.48E-5 6$PC=2.415E-6 34
169YB cG See comment on 470|g from 570 level.
169YB G 484.65 4 0.70 3 (M1) 0.0444 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.149 7
169YBS G KC=0.0373 5$LC=0.00551 8$MC=0.001230 17
169YBS G NC=0.000289 4$OC=4.14E-5 6$PC=2.235E-6 31
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.032 {I7}
169YB G 505.10 17 0.59 9M1 0.0399 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.125 19
169YBS G KC=0.0335 5$LC=0.00495 7$MC=0.001104 15
169YBS G NC=0.000259 4$OC=3.72E-5 5$PC=2.007E-6 28
169YB cG |a(K)exp|>0.028 {I9}
169YB cG For 505.4|g+502.8|g; component from 1463 level, suggested
169YB2cG by 1978Ba73, very weak. Relative branching from 749 level in
169YB3cG {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal imply more than I|g=0.59 intensity here from
169YB4cG this level if all I|g for a 505.4|g in that data set deexcites the 749
169YB5cG level and evaluator presumes that the 504|g is a doublet in that
169YBxcG reaction.
169YB cG RI combined value for 502.8|g+505.4|g.
169YB G 649.72 12 0.24 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.051 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.012
169YB L 761.822 18 (5/2)+ G
169YB E 9.7E-4 200.54 118.91 9 0.54 11
169YBS E EAV=244.5 13$CK=0.82367 33$CL=0.13231 16$CM+=0.04223 11
169YB G 690.87 3 2.05 10(E2) 0.0082011
169YB2 G %IG=0.435 23
169YBS G KC=0.00667 9$LC=0.001190 17$MC=0.000271 4
169YBS G NC=6.32E-5 9$OC=8.63E-6 12$PC=3.73E-7 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0078 {I7}
169YB G 761.864 25 2.2 4M1+E2 0.76 +28-250.0113 12 H
169YB2 G %IG=0.47 8
169YBS G KC=0.0095 10$LC=0.00143 13$MC=0.000320 28
169YBS G NC=7.5E-5 7$OC=1.07E-5 10$PC=5.6E-7 6
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas. E|g=761.35 {I3} in 1978Ba73.
169YB cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0095 {I10} for doublet.
169YB L 807.079 16 (7/2)- F
169YB E 7.5E-4 90.61 78.83 5 0.61 7
169YBS E EAV=224.4 13$CK=0.82382 33$CL=0.13261 16$CM+=0.04235 11
169YB G 542.91 13 0.31 4 (M1) 0.0331 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.066 9
169YBS G KC=0.0279 4$LC=0.00410 6$MC=0.000915 13
169YBS G NC=0.0002148 30$OC=3.08E-5 4$PC=1.665E-6 23
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.045 {I10}
169YB G 563.243 15 1.71 10(E2) 0.0132619
169YB2 G %IG=0.363 22
169YBS G KC=0.01058 15$LC=0.002079 29$MC=0.000478 7
169YBS G NC=0.0001111 16$OC=1.492E-5 21$PC=5.85E-7 8
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas. E|g=562.98 {I5} in 1978Ba73.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0140 {I15}
169YB G 707.94 6 1.48 9 M1+E2 +0.30 13 0.0161 7 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.314 20
169YB2 G A2=-0.23 19 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0136 6$LC=0.00199 8$MC=0.000445 16
169YBS G NC=0.000104 4$OC=1.50E-5 6$PC=8.0E-7 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.016 {I4}
169YB L 832.085 20 (7/2)+ G
169YB G 670.39 3 0.90 9 E2 0.0087812
169YB2 G %IG=0.191 19
169YBS G KC=0.00712 10$LC=0.001288 18$MC=0.000294 4
169YBS G NC=6.85E-5 10$OC=9.33E-6 13$PC=3.98E-7 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0079 {I27}
169YB G 760.95 4 0.9 5M1+E2 0.76 +29-250.0114 12 E
169YB2 G %IG=0.19 11
169YBL G FL=70.880
169YBS G KC=0.0095 10$LC=0.00144 13$MC=0.000321 28
169YBS G NC=7.5E-5 7$OC=1.07E-5 10$PC=5.6E-7 6
169YB cG E from Adopted Gammas. E|g=761.35 {I3} in 1978Ba73.
169YB cG RI deduced from I|g(761.0|g+761.9|g)=3.11 {I26} and
169YB2cG I|g(761.9|g)=2.2 {I4}.
169YB cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0095 {I10} for doublet.
169YB G 832.01 9 0.29 4 (M1) 0.0112816
169YB2 G %IG=0.062 9
169YBS G KC=0.00951 13$LC=0.001379 19$MC=0.000307 4
169YBS G NC=7.21E-5 10$OC=1.036E-5 15$PC=5.63E-7 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0085 {I12}
169YB L 851.7 5 3/2- ?
169YB cL Tentative level proposed in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 8.088E-5 0.1 19.2 GE 0.1 1 ?
169YBS E EAV=204.5 13$CK=0.82384 33$CL=0.13290 16$CM+=0.04245 11
169YB G 660.5 5 0.81 10 M1+E2 1.3 7 0.013 4 & ?
169YB2 G %IG=0.172 21
169YBF G FLAG=N
169YBS G KC=0.0109 35$LC=0.0018 4$MC=0.00040 9
169YBS G NC=9.3E-5 21$OC=1.30E-5 32$PC=6.3E-7 22
169YB cG RI combined intensity for 657.9|g+660.5|g.
169YB L 886.80 4 9/2+ G
169YB E 2.77E-4 170.495 208.867 19 0.495 20
169YBS E EAV=188.8 13$CK=0.82377 33$CL=0.13313 16$CM+=0.04254 11
169YB G 725.07 7 1.40 7 M1+E2 1.06 +27-210.0114 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.297 16
169YBS G KC=0.0095 8$LC=0.00147 10$MC=0.000331 22
169YBS G NC=7.8E-5 5$OC=1.09E-5 8$PC=5.5E-7 5
169YB cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0095 {I8}
169YB G 815.95 4 0.91 4 M1+E2 -0.80 +17-240.0094 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.193 9
169YB2 G A2=+0.13 10 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0079 7$LC=0.00119 9$MC=0.000266 19
169YBS G NC=6.2E-5 5$OC=8.9E-6 7$PC=4.6E-7 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0084 {I9}
169YB L 911.38 5 (5/2)- H
169YB E 6.1E-5 80.145 179.38 5 0.145 17
169YBS E EAV=177.7 14$CK=0.82369 33$CL=0.13329 16$CM+=0.04260 11
169YB G 633.071 20 0.34 4 H
169YB2 G %IG=0.072 9
169YB2 G FL=278.594
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I8}
169YB cG RI other: 0.20 {I10} from 1978Ba73.
169YB G 667.59 7 0.31 5 M1 0.0195827
169YB2 G %IG=0.066 11
169YBS G KC=0.01649 23$LC=0.002409 34$MC=0.000537 8
169YBS G NC=0.0001260 18$OC=1.809E-5 25$PC=9.81E-7 14
169YB G 824.70 17 0.15 4(M1) 0.0115316
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 9
169YBS G KC=0.00972 14$LC=0.001410 20$MC=0.000314 4
169YBS G NC=7.37E-5 10$OC=1.059E-5 15$PC=5.76E-7 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.015 {I5}
169YB L 919.80 5 (9/2)- F
169YB G 272.66 16 0.12 4 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.025 9
169YBF G FLAG=G
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.017 {I9}
169YB G 529.7 5 0.20 10 (M1) 0.0353 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YBS G KC=0.0297 4$LC=0.00437 6$MC=0.000975 14
169YBS G NC=0.0002290 33$OC=3.28E-5 5$PC=1.775E-6 25
169YB cG Alternative placement from 1177 level, as suggested
169YB2cG by 1980Ba07 and 1993Dz02, not likely. Relative branching from 920
169YB3cG level in {+168}Yb(n,|g) E=thermal require more than I|g=0.20
169YB4cG here.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.043 {I25}
169YB G 655.61 13 0.69 8 (M1) 0.0204929
169YB2 G %IG=0.146 17
169YBS G KC=0.01726 24$LC=0.002523 35$MC=0.000562 8
169YBS G NC=0.0001320 18$OC=1.895E-5 27$PC=1.027E-6 14
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0164 {I23}
169YB G 675.90 11 0.32 4 M1 0.0189827
169YB2 G %IG=0.068 9
169YBS G KC=0.01598 22$LC=0.002334 33$MC=0.000520 7
169YBS G NC=0.0001221 17$OC=1.753E-5 25$PC=9.51E-7 13
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.022 {I8}
169YB L 929.17 4 11/2-
169YB E 1.37E-5 290.34 79.82 9 0.34 7 1U
169YBS E EAV=180.3 14$CK=0.81046 40$CL=0.14314 21$CM+=0.04636 13
169YB G 406.03 7 0.181 16 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.0384 35
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.051 {I7} for doublet.
169YB G 539.37 15 0.40 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.085 13
169YB G 657.9 3 (E1) 0.00338 5 P ?
169YBL G FL=269.628
169YBS G KC=0.00287 4$LC=0.000402 6$MC=8.91E-5 13
169YBS G NC=2.083E-5 29$OC=2.95E-6 4$PC=1.528E-7 21
169YB cG RI 0.81 {I10} for 657.9|g+660.5|g doublet.
169YB G 664.69 8 0.52 5 [E2(+M1)] 0.014 5 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.110 11
169YBF G FLAG=N
169YBS G KC=0.012 5$LC=0.0019 6$MC=4.2E-4 12
169YBS G NC=9.9E-5 29$OC=1.4E-5 4$PC=7.0E-7 29
169YB cG $|a(K)exp=0.009 {I3} (1978Ba73) (mult.=E2(+M1)) for doubly-placed |g.
169YB G 767.55 4 1.46 12E1+M2 -0.17 +12-100.0034 14 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.310 26
169YB2 G A2=-0.347 76 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0029 11$LC=4.2E-4 19$MC=9.E-5 4
169YBS G NC=2.2E-5 10$OC=3.1E-6 14$PC=1.7E-7 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I4}
169YB L 960.612 14 7/2- Q
169YB E 0.00558 3425.2 77.112 14 25.2 7
169YBS E EAV=155.4 14$CK=0.82342 33$CL=0.13363 17$CM+=0.04273 11
169YB G 682.12 28 0.09 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.019 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.007 {I4}
169YB G 889.753 21 22.9 6 E1 1.86E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=4.86 15
169YB2 G A2=+0.179 43 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001584 22$LC=0.0002185 31$MC=4.83E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.130E-5 16$OC=1.608E-6 23$PC=8.52E-8 12
169YB cG M E1 for 889.8|g and 960.6|g established by low |a(K)exp from
169YB2cG preliminary normalization. Adopted normalization of 1978Ba73
169YB3cG assumes pure E1 for both. 1982Da23 report
169YB4cG |d=+0.018 {I29} for 889.8|g (nuclear orientation).
169YB G 960.622 20 100 2 E1 1.61E-3 2
169YB2 G %IG=21.2 5
169YB2 G A2=-0.477 31 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001372 19$LC=0.0001885 26$MC=4.17E-5 6
169YBS G NC=9.75E-6 14$OC=1.389E-6 19$PC=7.39E-8 10
169YB cG M see comment with 889.8|g. 1982Da23 report
169YB2cG |d=+0.06 {I+5-4} for 960.6|g (nuclear orientation).
169YB L 1061.2 3 (11/2-)
169YB cL Level proposed in 1988DzZW.
169YB G 782.6 3 0.20 10 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.032 {I20}
169YB L 1070.77 3 7/2+ S
169YB E 1.94E-5 220.67 58.609 33 0.67 5
169YBS E EAV=104.4 14$CK=0.82250 34$CL=0.13444 17$CM+=0.04303 12
169YB G 423.53 6 0.121 14M1 0.0630 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.0257 30
169YBS G KC=0.0530 7$LC=0.00786 11$MC=0.001754 25
169YBS G NC=0.000412 6$OC=5.90E-5 8$PC=3.18E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.066 {I14}
169YB G 480.00 8 0.68 8 (M1) 0.0455 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.144 17
169YBS G KC=0.0383 5$LC=0.00565 8$MC=0.001262 18
169YBS G NC=0.000296 4$OC=4.25E-5 6$PC=2.292E-6 32
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.050 {I8}
169YB G 908.64 7 0.52 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.110 15
169YBL G FL=161.645
169YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.003
169YB G 999.96 7 1.80 11M1+E2 +1.9 5 0.0045 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.382 24
169YB2 G A2=+1.00 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0037 4$LC=0.00057 5$MC=0.000128 10
169YBS G NC=2.99E-5 24$OC=4.2E-6 4$PC=2.13E-7 22
169YB cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I5} (1978Ba73). Sign from +1.3 {I6}
169YB2cG (1982Da23 - nuclear orientation).
169YB G 1070.81 7 1.71 8 E0+M1+E2 0.042 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.363 18
169YB2 G A2=+0.171 66 (1982Da23)
169YB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.0367 {I26} (1978Ba73) and nuclear orientation
169YB2cG (1982Da23). 1982Da23 report two solutions for |d(M1,E2) (-0.74
169YB3cG {I+11-13}, +10 {I+50-5}).
169YB cG CC estimated from |a(K)exp (1978Ba73) and K/L for E0 transitions
169YB5cG (2020Do01 - K/L=7.1 for 1197|g of {+168}Yb was used).
169YB L 1078.335 19 9/2- Q
169YB E 7.6E-5 73.14 107.932 15 3.14 10
169YBS E EAV=100.8 14$CK=0.82242 34$CL=0.13450 17$CM+=0.04306 12
169YB G 916.710 29 3.71 11E1(+M2) -0.010 27 0.00176 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.787 27
169YB2 G A2=+0.149 41 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001499 30$LC=0.000207 5$MC=4.57E-5 10
169YBS G NC=1.068E-5 24$OC=1.520E-6 34$PC=8.07E-8 18
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I3}
169YB G 1007.465 32 7.71 19E1+M2 -0.08 5 0.0015817 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.64 5
169YB2 G A2=-0.391 31 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00134 14$LC=0.000186 22$MC=4.1E-5 5
169YBS G NC=9.6E-6 12$OC=1.37E-6 17$PC=7.3E-8 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00137 {I10}
169YB G 1078.28 4 4.58 18E1(+M2) -0.16 +6-8 0.0016 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.97 4
169YB2 G A2=+0.327 57 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00139 33$LC=2.0E-4 5$MC=4.3E-5 12
169YBS G NC=1.01E-5 27$OC=1.4E-6 4$PC=7.7E-8 21
169YB cG MR from |a(K)exp=0.00139 {I20} (1978Ba73). sign
169YB2cG from |d=-0.01 {I3} (1982Da23 - nuclear orientation)
169YB L 1141.44 7 (9/2)+ S
169YB E 3.6E-7 60.111 119.335 44 0.111 11
169YBS E EAV=70.3 15$CK=0.82171 34$CL=0.13503 17$CM+=0.04326 12
169YB G 979.79 7 0.52 5 E2(+M1) 0.0057 18 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.110 11
169YBS G KC=0.0048 16$LC=7.1E-4 20$MC=1.6E-4 4
169YBS G NC=3.7E-5 11$OC=5.3E-6 16$PC=2.8E-7 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0023 {I7}
169YB L 1167.74 8 (7/2,9/2)-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 4.0E-7 80.41 48.747 43 0.41 4
169YBS E EAV=57.2 15$CK=0.82138 35$CL=0.13527 18$CM+=0.04335 12
169YB G 247.2 3 0.24 8M1+E2 1.0 +26-8 0.20 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.051 17
169YBS G KC=0.16 6$LC=0.0338 5$MC=0.00782 31
169YBS G NC=0.00182 6$OC=0.000241 11$PC=9.E-6 4
169YB cG RI deduced from I|g=0.39 {I7} for 247.2|g+247.8|g, separate Ice
169YB2cG components for doublet (1978Ba73), and known E2 multipolarity for
169YB3cG 247.8|g.
169YB cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=0.16 {I6}
169YB G 520.02 6 0.21 3 (E2) 0.0161523 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.045 6
169YBS G KC=0.01277 18$LC=0.00262 4$MC=0.000605 8
169YBS G NC=0.0001406 20$OC=1.873E-5 26$PC=7.02E-7 10
169YB cG RI deduced from total I|g(520|g)=0.293 {I25} and I|g=0.080
169YB2cG {I15} for 591-level placement.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0096 {I28} for doublet dominated by
169YBxcG this transition.
169YB G 903.42 23 0.17 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.036 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.007 {I4}
169YB G 1068.54 8 1.36 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.289 18
169YB cG Alternative placement from 1716.1 level, as suggested
169YB2cG by 1978Ba73 and 1993Dz02, not likely. 1980Ba07 assign all intensity to
169YB3cG this 1168-level placement on basis of ce|g coin data.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I15}
169YB L 1177.01 6(7/2,9/2)+
169YB E 1.63E-7 360.283 218.900 33 0.283 21
169YBS E EAV=52.5 15$CK=0.82126 35$CL=0.13536 18$CM+=0.04339 12
169YB G 1015.4 4 A
169YB cG Seen only in ce spectrum (1976Ba61).
169YB G 1106.11 6 0.65 6 M1(+E2) 0.0043 13
169YB2 G %IG=0.138 13
169YBS G KC=0.0036 11$LC=5.3E-4 15$MC=1.19E-4 32
169YBS G NC=2.8E-5 8$OC=4.0E-6 11$PC=2.1E-7 7$IPC=3.4E-7 4
169YB cG $A{-2}=-0.14 {I18} for spin 7/2 or -0.13 {I16} for spin 9/2 (1982Da23)
169YB cG M,MR |d=-0.21 {I+13-17} (if J(1177.0 level)=7/2) or |d=-0.41
169YB2cG {I22} (if J=9/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture.
169YB3cG However, |a(K)exp value implies pure M1.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0053 {I7}
169YB G 1177.7 4 0.68 7 A
169YB2 G %IG=0.144 15
169YB cG RI see comment with 1176.5|g from 1420 level.
169YB L 1204.55 17
169YB cL Level proposed in 1988DzZW and 1993Dz02.
169YB G 613.9 3 0.15 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.015 {I11}
169YB cG Placement from 1993Dz02.
169YB G 1117.61 20 0.13 4 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.028 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.010 {I5}
169YB L 1283.282 20(7/2,9/2)-
169YB E 2.15 117.928 23 2.15 11
169YBS E CK=0.81971 36$CL=0.13648 18$CM+=0.04381 12
169YB G 476.38 15 0.13 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.028 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.036 {I18}
169YB G 1212.52 8 2.04 16E1(+M2) -0.02 7 0.00109 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.433 35
169YB2 G A2=+0.13 10 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00090 6$LC=0.000123 10$MC=2.71E-5 22
169YBS G NC=6.3E-6 5$OC=9.1E-7 7$PC=4.9E-8 4$IPC=2.61E-5 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=8.2|*10{+-4} {I7}
169YB G 1283.28 4 9.0 4 E1(+M2) -0.01 +6-5 1.01E-3 3 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.91 9
169YB2 G A2=-0.447 41 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000815 27$LC=0.000111 4$MC=2.44E-5 9
169YBS G NC=5.71E-6 21$OC=8.17E-7 31$PC=4.41E-8 16$IPC=5.70E-5 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=7.3|*10{+-4} {I7}
169YB L 1343.57 4(7/2)-
169YB E 1.38 68.064 20 1.38 6
169YBS E CK=0.81866 37$CL=0.13723 19$CM+=0.04410 12
169YB G 272.66 16 0.25 8 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.053 17
169YB cG RI deduced from I|g(272.1|g+272.7|g)=0.37 {I6} and
169YB2cG I|g(272.1|g)=0.12 {I4}.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.017 {I9} for doublet.
169YB G 432.27 7 0.118 13M1+E2 1.2 +45-7 0.040 13
169YB2 G %IG=0.0250 28
169YBL G FL=911.38
169YBS G KC=0.032 12$LC=0.0058 11$MC=0.00132 23
169YBS G NC=0.00031 5$OC=4.2E-5 9$PC=1.9E-6 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.033 {I12}
169YB G 1065.09 5 2.00 16M1 0.00614 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.425 35
169YBS G KC=0.00518 7$LC=0.000745 10$MC=0.0001657 23
169YBS G NC=3.89E-5 5$OC=5.60E-6 8$PC=3.06E-7 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0063 {I8}
169YB G 1099.89 11 0.27 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.057 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp<0.003
169YB G 1244.24 12 0.32 4 M1 0.00422 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.068 9
169YBS G KC=0.00355 5$LC=0.000508 7$MC=0.0001130 16
169YBS G NC=2.65E-5 4$OC=3.82E-6 5$PC=2.090E-7 29$IPC=1.279E-5 18
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I11}
169YB G 1272.46 6 2.91 14
169YB2 G %IG=0.618 32
169YBL G FL=70.880
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I5}
169YB G 1343.56 13 0.63 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.134 11
169YB L 1406.35 4 9/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.69 98.30 6 0.69 9
169YBS E CK=0.81741 38$CL=0.13814 20$CM+=0.04444 13
169YB G 657.86 30 0.81 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.172 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp|>0.016 {I9}
169YB cG RI combined intensity for 657.9|g+660.5|g.
169YB G 1141.96 10 0.176 23M1 0.00518 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.037 5
169YBS G KC=0.00437 6$LC=0.000627 9$MC=0.0001395 20
169YBS G NC=3.28E-5 5$OC=4.71E-6 7$PC=2.58E-7 4$IPC=1.408E-6 20
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0054 {I20}
169YB G 1162.49 7 0.77 5M1 0.00496 7 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.163 11
169YBS G KC=0.00419 6$LC=0.000600 8$MC=0.0001335 19
169YBS G NC=3.14E-5 4$OC=4.51E-6 6$PC=2.467E-7 35$IPC=2.59E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I6} for doublet.
169YB G 1215.28 11 0.45 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.096 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.0035
169YB G 1307.20 5 0.48 8 E2 2.20E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.102 17
169YBS G KC=0.001830 26$LC=0.000272 4$MC=6.08E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.424E-5 20$OC=2.014E-6 28$PC=1.030E-7 14$IPC=1.977E-5 28
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0016 {I4}
169YB G 1406.23 5 0.96 4 E1+M2 +0.38 +21-350.0018 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.204 9
169YB2 G A2=+0.15 24 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0014 7$LC=2.0E-4 11$MC=4.4E-5 25
169YBS G NC=1.0E-5 6$OC=1.5E-6 8$PC=8.E-8 4$IPC=0.000115 15
169YB cG MR from |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I7} (1978Ba73). Sign from +0.08 {I13}
169YB2cG nuclear orientation (1982Da23).
169YB L 1420.31 13 (5/2-,7/2,9/2-)
169YB cL Proposed as J=7/2 member of 1/2[521] |b vibration band by
169YB2cL 1980Ba07. However, level is absent from 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.22 48.78 8 0.22 4
169YBS E CK=0.81710 38$CL=0.13836 20$CM+=0.04454 13
169YB G 1156.03 16 0.22 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.047 9
169YB G 1176.48 22 0.68 7 A
169YB2 G %IG=0.144 15
169YB cG RI combined value for 1176.5|g+1177.7|g. |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I2}
169YB2cG for doublet.
169YB G 1321.53 16 0.33 3 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.070 6
169YB L 1427.12 10(7/2,9/2)-
169YB E 0.36 128.56 14 0.36 12
169YBS E CK=0.81695 38$CL=0.13847 20$CM+=0.04458 13
169YB G 466.93 21 0.20 5(E2) 0.0212830
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 11
169YBS G KC=0.01658 23$LC=0.00363 5$MC=0.000843 12
169YBS G NC=0.0001956 28$OC=2.58E-5 4$PC=9.03E-7 13
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.020 {I10}
169YB G 664.69 8 0.52 5 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.110 11
169YBL G FL=761.822
169YBF G FLAG=N
169YB cG $|a(K)exp=0.009 {I3} (1978Ba73) (mult.=E2(+M1)) for doubly-placed |g.
169YB G 857.15 24 0.15 8 A
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I8}. The uncertainty allows the transition
169YB2cG as either M1 or E2.
169YB G 939.7 5 0.50 25 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.11 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I23}
169YB G 1037.49 13 0.20 10 A
169YB2 G %IG=0.042 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.023 {I13}
169YB G 1148.0 6 0.23 12 D
169YB2 G %IG=0.049 25
169YB G 1162.49 7 0.77 5 M1 0.00496 7 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.163 11
169YBL G FL=264.272
169YBS G KC=0.00419 6$LC=0.000600 8$MC=0.0001335 19
169YBS G NC=3.14E-5 4$OC=4.51E-6 6$PC=2.467E-7 35$IPC=2.59E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I6} for doublet.
169YB L 1444.75 5 7/2-,9/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.245 258.711 45 0.245 25
169YBS E CK=0.81654 39$CL=0.13877 20$CM+=0.04469 13
169YB G 796.93 7 0.34 7 E2 0.00597 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.072 15
169YBS G KC=0.00491 7$LC=0.000829 12$MC=0.0001878 26
169YBS G NC=4.38E-5 6$OC=6.05E-6 8$PC=2.75E-7 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0049 {I13}
169YB G 1180.45 6 0.81 9 M1(+E2) 0.0037 11
169YB2 G %IG=0.172 19
169YB2 G A2=-0.489 91 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0031 9$LC=4.6E-4 12$MC=1.02E-4 27
169YBS G NC=2.4E-5 6$OC=3.4E-6 9$PC=1.8E-7 6$IPC=3.7E-6 4
169YB cG $A{-2}=-0.489 91 for spin 7/2 or -0.428 80 for spin 9/2 (1982Da23)
169YB cG M |d=-0.7 {I+2-10} (if J(1444.7 level)=7/2) or |d=+0.88 {I24}
169YB2cG or -0.02 {I+16-11} (if J=9/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23)
169YB3cG suggests E2 admixture. |a(K)exp implies no E2 admixture.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0049 {I12}
169YB G 1201.0 9
169YBF G FLAG=A
169YB cG Seen only in ce spectrum (1976Ba61).
169YB L 1449.781 13 7/2-
169YB E 15.8 46.896 14 15.8 4
169YBS E CK=0.81642 39$CL=0.13886 20$CM+=0.04472 13
169YB G 166.509 19 0.546 25M1+E2 +0.5 3 0.73 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.116 6
169YB2 G A2=-0.74 20 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.59 7$LC=0.115 14$MC=0.026 4
169YBS G NC=0.0062 8$OC=0.00083 7$PC=3.5E-5 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.52 {I14} (1978Ba73); K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=
169YB2cG 75 {I17}:10:26.6:21.6:2.5:6.6:5 (1973Bo38). |d=9 {I-6}, from ce ratio
169YB3cG data using the BriccMixing code, does not reproduce |a(K)exp well.
169YB G 489.25 6 0.60 7 M1 0.0433 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.127 15
169YBS G KC=0.0364 5$LC=0.00538 8$MC=0.001200 17
169YBS G NC=0.000282 4$OC=4.04E-5 6$PC=2.181E-6 31
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.045 {I7}
169YB G 617.682 25 1.01 8 E1 0.00386 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.214 17
169YBS G KC=0.00327 5$LC=0.000460 6$MC=0.0001019 14
169YBS G NC=2.381E-5 33$OC=3.36E-6 5$PC=1.735E-7 24
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I22}
169YB G 642.65 8 0.24 4 (M1) 0.0215630
169YB2 G %IG=0.051 9
169YBS G KC=0.01815 25$LC=0.00265 4$MC=0.000592 8
169YBS G NC=0.0001390 19$OC=1.995E-5 28$PC=1.081E-6 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.036 {I11}
169YB G 687.93 4 1.15 6 (E1(+M2))+0.01 8 0.0031 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.244 13
169YB2 G A2=+0.31 14 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00262 31$LC=0.00037 5$MC=8.1E-5 12
169YBS G NC=1.90E-5 28$OC=2.7E-6 4$PC=1.40E-7 21
169YB cG M from nuclear orientation, with |D|p=yes from decay scheme.
169YB G 701.04 24 0.25 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.053 11
169YB G 802.34 4 1.13 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.240 20
169YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.004
169YB G 879.93 4 1.46 8 M1+E2 -0.9 4 0.0076 12 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.310 18
169YB2 G A2=+1.44 45 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0064 11$LC=0.00095 14$MC=0.000213 30
169YBS G NC=5.0E-5 7$OC=7.1E-6 10$PC=3.7E-7 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0086 {I9}
169YB G 926.6 5 0.10 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp|<0.028
169YB G 1060.28 4 8.16 27M1+E2 +0.036 22 0.00620 9 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.73 7
169YB2 G A2=+0.207 33 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00524 7$LC=0.000753 11$MC=0.0001675 23
169YBS G NC=3.93E-5 6$OC=5.66E-6 8$PC=3.09E-7 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0052 {I5}
169YB G 1171.20 4 3.43 11M1+E2 +0.22 +74-150.0048 9 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.728 27
169YB2 G A2=-0.562 77 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0040 8$LC=0.00058 11$MC=0.000129 24
169YBS G NC=3.0E-5 6$OC=4.3E-6 8$PC=2.4E-7 5$IPC=3.23E-6 30
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I4}
169YB G 1206.00 4 2.15 14M1+E2 0.83 GE 0.0031 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.456 31
169YB2 G A2=+0.34 13 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0026 5$LC=0.00039 7$MC=8.7E-5 15
169YBS G NC=2.04E-5 35$OC=2.9E-6 5$PC=1.51E-7 31$IPC=6.0E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0043 {I5}
169YB G 1258.59 6 1.52 4 M1 0.00411 6
169YB2 G %IG=0.323 10
169YBS G KC=0.00346 5$LC=0.000494 7$MC=0.0001099 15
169YBS G NC=2.58E-5 4$OC=3.71E-6 5$PC=2.033E-7 28$IPC=1.527E-5 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0031 {I6}
169YB G 1350.65 9 0.828 21M1+E2 -0.19 +15-210.0034415 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.176 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.66 26 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00287 13$LC=0.000410 18$MC=9.1E-5 4
169YBS G NC=2.14E-5 9$OC=3.08E-6 13$PC=1.69E-7 8$IPC=3.60E-5 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I6}
169YB G 1379.04 4 9.0 E1 9.54E-413 @
169YB2 G %IG=1.910 34
169YBL G FL=70.880
169YBS G KC=0.000719 10$LC=9.72E-5 14$MC=2.144E-5 30
169YBS G NC=5.02E-6 7$OC=7.18E-7 10$PC=3.89E-8 5$IPC=0.0001112 16
169YB cG |a(K)exp=6.8|*10{+-4} {I11} for doublet.
169YB cG RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g
169YB2cG for each placement; I|g=13.6 {I3} for doublet.
169YB G 1449.74 4 42.4 9 E1(+M2) 0.00 4 9.32E-416 K
169YB2 G %IG=9.00 23
169YB2 G A2=-0.435 30 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000660 12$LC=8.91E-5 18$MC=1.96E-5 4
169YBS G NC=4.60E-6 9$OC=6.59E-7 13$PC=3.58E-8 7$IPC=0.0001584 22
169YB cG |a(K)exp=5.3|*10{+-4} {I15}
169YB L 1463.412 16 7/2-
169YB E 5.07 177.375 17 5.07 17
169YBS E CK=0.81608 39$CL=0.1391 2$CM+=0.04482 13
169YB G 502.8 3 0.59 9[M1,E2] 0.029 11
169YB2 G %IG=0.125 19
169YBS G KC=0.024 10$LC=0.0040 11$MC=8.9E-4 22
169YBS G NC=2.1E-4 5$OC=2.9E-5 8$PC=1.4E-6 6
169YB cG RI combined value for 502.8|g+505.4|g.
169YB G 939.7 5 0.50 25 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.11 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I23} for doublet.
169YB G 1073.79 3 4.8 3 M1+E2 +0.18 7 0.0059311 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.02 7
169YB2 G A2=+0.409 94 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00500 10$LC=0.000720 13$MC=0.0001602 29
169YBS G NC=3.76E-5 7$OC=5.41E-6 10$PC=2.95E-7 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0046 {I5}
169YB G 1184.875 24 9.5 4 M1+E2 -0.15 7 0.00469 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=2.02 9
169YB2 G A2=-0.312 64 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00396 7$LC=0.000568 10$MC=0.0001263 22
169YBS G NC=2.96E-5 5$OC=4.26E-6 7$PC=2.33E-7 4$IPC=4.52E-6 7
169YB cG MR other value: -0.10 {I+0-13} (|g|g(|q), 1980Bu24).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I3}
169YB G 1199.10 6 0.96 8 M1+E2 +0.22 +25-190.0045128 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.204 17
169YB2 G A2=+0.47 28 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00381 24$LC=0.000546 32$MC=0.000121 7
169YBS G NC=2.85E-5 17$OC=4.10E-6 25$PC=2.24E-7 15$IPC=6.09E-6 19
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0040 {I6}
169YB G 1219.61 4 1.28 17 M1+E2 -1.0 +3-9 0.0035 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.27 4
169YB2 G A2=+0.28 13 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0029 5$LC=0.00042 6$MC=9.5E-5 14
169YBS G NC=2.22E-5 32$OC=3.2E-6 5$PC=1.69E-7 29$IPC=8.0E-6 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0064 {I11}
169YB G 1463.39 4 6.45 15E1(+M2) +0.02 +11-9 0.00093 9 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.37 4
169YB2 G A2=-0.449 74 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00065 8$LC=8.8E-5 12$MC=1.94E-5 27
169YBS G NC=4.5E-6 6$OC=6.5E-7 9$PC=3.5E-8 5$IPC=0.0001676 33
169YB cG |a(K)exp=8.1|*10{+-4} {I14}
169YB L 1540.69 4 9/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.69 98.15 6 0.69 9
169YBS E CK=0.81394 41$CL=0.14064 22$CM+=0.04541 13
169YB G 1017.58 5 1.11 8 M1 0.0068610
169YB2 G %IG=0.236 17
169YB2 G A2=+0.88 16 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00579 8$LC=0.000834 12$MC=0.0001856 26
169YBS G NC=4.36E-5 6$OC=6.26E-6 9$PC=3.42E-7 5
169YB cG M M1+E2 with 0.41|<|d|<3.05 (nuclear orientation,
169YB2cG 1982Da23).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0055 {I9}
169YB G 1151.70 7 0.88 11M1+E2 0.36 GE 0.0038 10 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.187 24
169YB2 G A2=+0.18 34 (1982Da23)
169YBL G FL=389.523
169YBS G KC=0.0032 9$LC=0.00047 11$MC=0.000105 25
169YBS G NC=2.5E-5 6$OC=3.5E-6 9$PC=1.8E-7 5$IPC=1.67E-6 18
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0045 {I15}
169YB G 1276.62 23 0.75 7M1 0.00397 6 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.159 15
169YBS G KC=0.00334 5$LC=0.000477 7$MC=0.0001061 15
169YBS G NC=2.492E-5 35$OC=3.59E-6 5$PC=1.964E-7 28$IPC=1.861E-5 26
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I11} for doublet.
169YB G 1296.90 5 0.71 4 M1+E2 0.9 +8-5 0.0031 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.151 9
169YBS G KC=0.0026 4$LC=0.00038 6$MC=8.4E-5 13
169YBS G NC=1.97E-5 30$OC=2.8E-6 4$PC=1.51E-7 26$IPC=2.06E-5 15
169YB cG MR from |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I4}
169YB G 1540.63 15 0.17 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.036 9
169YB L 1554.876 24 9/2-
169YB E 1.63 157.759 41 1.63 15
169YBS E CK=0.81350 42$CL=0.14096 22$CM+=0.04554 14
169YB G 1031.91 6 0.56 3 M1+E2 -0.28 +19-290.0064 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.119 7
169YB2 G A2=-0.22 25 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0054 5$LC=0.00078 6$MC=0.000174 14
169YBS G NC=4.08E-5 32$OC=5.9E-6 5$PC=3.18E-7 29
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0063 {I9}
169YB G 1165.21 11 0.73 5 M1 0.00493 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.155 11
169YBS G KC=0.00416 6$LC=0.000597 8$MC=0.0001328 19
169YBS G NC=3.12E-5 4$OC=4.48E-6 6$PC=2.453E-7 34$IPC=2.79E-6 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I13}
169YB G 1276.62 23 0.75 7M1 0.00397 6 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.159 15
169YBS G KC=0.00334 5$LC=0.000477 7$MC=0.0001061 15
169YBS G NC=2.492E-5 35$OC=3.59E-6 5$PC=1.964E-7 28$IPC=1.861E-5 26
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I11} for doublet.
169YB G 1290.59 3 4.89 26M1+E2 0.8 +5-4 0.0032 4
169YB2 G %IG=1.04 6
169YB2 G A2=-0.195 48 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00272 35$LC=0.00039 5$MC=8.7E-5 10
169YBS G NC=2.05E-5 24$OC=2.9E-6 4$PC=1.58E-7 22$IPC=1.97E-5 12
169YB cG MR from |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I3} (1978Ba73). Other: -0.33 {I6}
169YB2cG or +1.61 {I20} (1982Da23 - nuclear orientation).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0027 {I3}
169YB G 1311.13 7 0.28 5 M1 0.00373 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.059 11
169YBS G KC=0.00313 4$LC=0.000447 6$MC=9.94E-5 14
169YBS G NC=2.335E-5 33$OC=3.36E-6 5$PC=1.841E-7 26$IPC=2.59E-5 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I8}
169YB G 1363.83 9 0.30 4 E2 2.04E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.064 9
169YBS G KC=0.001689 24$LC=0.0002496 35$MC=5.57E-5 8
169YBS G NC=1.304E-5 18$OC=1.847E-6 26$PC=9.51E-8 13$IPC=3.17E-5 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I6}
169YB G 1483.97 9 0.86 6 [E1] 9.25E-413 N ?
169YB2 G %IG=0.183 13
169YBS G KC=0.000634 9$LC=8.55E-5 12$MC=1.886E-5 26
169YBS G NC=4.42E-6 6$OC=6.33E-7 9$PC=3.44E-8 5$IPC=0.0001818 25
169YB cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0015 {I4} (1978Ba73) favors mult=E2, inconsistent with
169YB2cG this placement. Consequently, the evaluator shows the placement as
169YB3cG uncertain.
169YB G 1554.4 5 0.46 11 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.098 23
169YB L 1565.65 5 (7/2-)
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.37 48.389 48 0.37 4
169YBS E CK=0.81315 42$CL=0.14122 22$CM+=0.04564 14
169YB G 1301.33 5 0.66 4 (M1) 0.00380 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.140 9
169YBS G KC=0.00319 4$LC=0.000456 6$MC=0.0001012 14
169YBS G NC=2.378E-5 33$OC=3.42E-6 5$PC=1.875E-7 26$IPC=2.369E-5 33
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I4}
169YB G 1321.53 16 0.33 3 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.070 6
169YB G 1374.53 8 0.90 4 (M1) 0.00335 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.191 9
169YBS G KC=0.00280 4$LC=0.000399 6$MC=8.86E-5 12
169YBS G NC=2.081E-5 29$OC=2.99E-6 4$PC=1.642E-7 23$IPC=4.35E-5 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0042 {I12}
169YB L 1616.80 4 (1/2+,3/2,5/2+)
169YB E 0.407 158.279 18 0.407 15
169YBS E CK=0.81130 44$CL=0.14255 24$CM+=0.04615 14
169YB G 1529.87 4 1.92 6 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.408 15
169YB L 1656.22 9 5/2-,7/2-,9/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.44 58.19 5 0.44 5
169YBS E CK=0.80966 46$CL=0.14374 25$CM+=0.04661 15
169YB G 934.5 5 0.30 15
169YB2 G %IG=0.064 32
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I21} for doublet.
169YB G 1266.68 25 0.57 10 E2 2.33E-3 3 A
169YB2 G %IG=0.121 21
169YB2 G A2=+0.40 35 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001944 27$LC=0.000291 4$MC=6.50E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.522E-5 21$OC=2.150E-6 30$PC=1.094E-7 15$IPC=1.324E-5 19
169YB cG M -0.65|<|d|<+3.30 (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23)
169YB2cG suggests little, if any, M1 admixture.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I5}
169YB G 1392.27 4 0.45 E2 1.97E-3 3 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.0955 17
169YBL G FL=264.272
169YBS G KC=0.001624 23$LC=0.0002392 33$MC=5.34E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.249E-5 17$OC=1.771E-6 25$PC=9.14E-8 13$IPC=3.89E-5 5
169YB cG RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g
169YB2cG for each placement; I|g(exp)=5.56 {I12} for doublet.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} for doublet.
169YB G 1412.39 10 0.49 5 M1(+E2) -0.08 18 0.00315 8 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.104 11
169YB2 G A2=+0.44 29 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00261 7$LC=0.000372 10$MC=8.27E-5 21
169YBS G NC=1.94E-5 5$OC=2.80E-6 7$PC=1.53E-7 4$IPC=5.61E-5 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.004 {I1}
169YB G 1556.7 4 0.24 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.051 9
169YB L 1658.10 3 5/2+
169YB E 4.86 137.143 15 4.86 13
169YBS E CK=0.80957 46$CL=0.14380 25$CM+=0.04663 15
169YB G 587.44 6 0.27 5 M1 0.0271 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.057 11
169YBS G KC=0.02279 32$LC=0.00334 5$MC=0.000746 10
169YBS G NC=0.0001751 25$OC=2.513E-5 35$PC=1.360E-6 19
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}
169YB cG Placement from 1992Dz03; based on energy.
169YB G 1088.23 8 0.43 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.091 15
169YB cG |a(K)exp<0.002.
169YB G 1379.04 4 4.6 E1 9.54E-413 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.976 17
169YBL G FL=278.594
169YBS G KC=0.000719 10$LC=9.72E-5 14$MC=2.144E-5 30
169YBS G NC=5.02E-6 7$OC=7.18E-7 10$PC=3.89E-8 5$IPC=0.0001112 16
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0068 {I11} for doublet.
169YB cG See comment on 1379|g from 1450 level.
169YB G 1466.84 4 14.2 4 E1(+M2) -0.03 4 9.34E-426 K
169YB2 G %IG=3.01 10
169YB2 G A2=-0.395 40 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000651 22$LC=8.79E-5 32$MC=1.94E-5 7
169YBS G NC=4.54E-6 17$OC=6.51E-7 24$PC=3.53E-8 13$IPC=0.0001699 24
169YB cG |a(K)exp=8.5|*10{+-4} {I12}
169YB G 1658.08 5 3.39 8 M1+E2 +0.28 11 0.00222 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.720 21
169YB2 G A2=+0.51 12 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00174 4$LC=0.000248 6$MC=5.50E-5 14
169YBS G NC=1.291E-5 32$OC=1.86E-6 5$PC=1.020E-7 27$IPC=0.0001609 31
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I4}
169YB L 1689.290 23 7/2-
169YB E 1.62 57.572 16 1.62 5
169YBS E CK=0.80809 48$CL=0.14487 26$CM+=0.04704 15
169YB G 406.03 7 0.181 16 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.0384 35
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0051 {I7} for doublet
169YB G 728.73 6 1.04 6 (M1) 0.0157022
169YB2 G %IG=0.221 13
169YBS G KC=0.01323 19$LC=0.001927 27$MC=0.000429 6
169YBS G NC=0.0001008 14$OC=1.448E-5 20$PC=7.86E-7 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0155 {I16}
169YB G 1497.92 4 1.20 5 M1+E2 +0.24 6 0.00273 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.255 12
169YB2 G A2=-0.12 11 (1982Da23)
169YBL G FL=191.216
169YBS G KC=0.00223 4$LC=0.000317 6$MC=7.05E-5 12
169YBS G NC=1.656E-5 29$OC=2.38E-6 4$PC=1.306E-7 24$IPC=8.78E-5 13
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I5}
169YB G 1618.48 4 3.04 7 E1(+M2) +0.04 6 0.00093 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.645 19
169YB2 G A2=+0.209 90 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000554 32$LC=7.5E-5 5$MC=1.65E-5 11
169YBS G NC=3.86E-6 26$OC=5.5E-7 4$PC=3.01E-8 20$IPC=0.000279 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=6.0|*10{+-4} {I16}
169YB G 1689.35 5 2.23 11E1(+M2) -0.03 7 0.00093 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.473 25
169YB2 G A2=-0.415 55 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000514 31$LC=6.9E-5 5$MC=1.52E-5 11
169YBS G NC=3.56E-6 25$OC=5.1E-7 4$PC=2.79E-8 19$IPC=0.000332 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=6.3|*10{+-4} {I20}
169YB L 1694.48 6 5/2+
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.121 88.691 30 0.121 8
169YBS E CK=0.80783 48$CL=0.14506 27$CM+=0.04712 15
169YB G 1595.89 23 0.097 23
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0028 {I17}
169YB G 1607.51 6 0.289 23E1(+M2) +0.04 18 0.0009320 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.061 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.31 33 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=5.6E-4 17$LC=7.6E-5 26$MC=1.7E-5 6
169YBS G NC=3.9E-6 14$OC=5.6E-7 20$PC=3.0E-8 11$IPC=0.000271 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=5.4|*10{+-4} {I20}
169YB G 1694.38 14 0.186 13(M1) 2.19E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.0395 28
169YBS G KC=0.001700 24$LC=0.0002409 34$MC=5.35E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.256E-5 18$OC=1.809E-6 25$PC=9.95E-8 14$IPC=0.0001821 25
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I9}
169YB L 1707.71 8 (7/2,9/2)+
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.410 198.139 22 0.410 19
169YBS E CK=0.80713 49$CL=0.14556 27$CM+=0.04730 15
169YB G 875.9 0.15 8 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I8} for doublet
169YB G 1636.82 8 0.94 4 M1+E2 0.0019 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.200 9
169YBS G KC=0.00152 32$LC=0.00022 4$MC=4.8E-5 10
169YBS G NC=1.13E-5 23$OC=1.62E-6 34$PC=8.8E-8 20$IPC=0.000137 16
169YB cG $A{-2}=+0.437 {I88} for spin 7/2 or +0.382 {I77} for spin 9/2
169YB2cG (1982Da23)
169YB cG M restricted to M1+E2 by |a(K)exp and two |d values (both
169YB2cG large) +10 {I+18-4} (if J(1707.8 level)=7/2 or -2.8 {I+15-158} (if
169YB3cG J=9/2)) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23).
169YB cG |a(K)exp=9|*10{+-4} {I5}
169YB G 1707.97 9 0.91 1 (M1+E2) 0.0018135 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.193 4
169YBS G KC=0.00139 28$LC=0.00020 4$MC=4.4E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.03E-5 20$OC=1.48E-6 30$PC=8.0E-8 18$IPC=0.000169 20
169YB cG RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g
169YB2cG for each placement; I|g(exp)=1.86 {I26} for doublet.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I4} for doublet
169YB L 1708.52 4 7/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.84 77.827 37 0.84 7
169YBS E CK=0.80709 49$CL=0.14559 27$CM+=0.04731 15
169YB G 1318.53 12 0.55 5(M1) 0.00368 5 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.117 11
169YBL G FL=389.523
169YBS G KC=0.00309 4$LC=0.000441 6$MC=9.81E-5 14
169YBS G NC=2.303E-5 32$OC=3.31E-6 5$PC=1.816E-7 25$IPC=2.77E-5 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I9} for doublet.
169YB G 1429.87 9 1.33 8 M1(+E2) +0.02 +18-130.00307 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.282 18
169YB2 G A2=-0.45 10 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00254 5$LC=0.000362 7$MC=8.05E-5 16
169YBS G NC=1.89E-5 4$OC=2.72E-6 6$PC=1.493E-7 32$IPC=6.24E-5 10
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0035 {I6}
169YB G 1517.31 4 2.33 13M1+E2 -5.9 +7-9 1.75E-3 3 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.495 29
169YB2 G A2=+0.244 44 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001406 21$LC=0.0002042 30$MC=4.55E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.065E-5 16$OC=1.515E-6 22$PC=7.93E-8 12$IPC=7.72E-5 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0013 {I3}
169YB L 1716.02 3 7/2+
169YB E 1.69 77.511 20 1.69 7
169YBS E CK=0.8067 5$CL=0.14589 28$CM+=0.04744 15
169YB G 1326.85 3 2.54 E1 9.81E-414 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.539 10
169YBL G FL=389.523
169YBS G KC=0.000768 11$LC=0.0001040 15$MC=2.296E-5 32
169YBS G NC=5.38E-6 8$OC=7.69E-7 11$PC=4.16E-8 6$IPC=7.94E-5 11
169YB cG RI ce|g coincidence data (1980Ba07) used to estimate I|g
169YB2cG for each placement; I|g(exp)=3.02 {I8} for doublet.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=8.9|*10{+-4} {I33}
169YB G 1437.43 4 2.67 9 E1(+M2) -0.07 +9-8 0.0009610 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.567 22
169YB2 G A2=-0.382 69 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00069 9$LC=9.4E-5 14$MC=2.08E-5 30
169YBS G NC=4.9E-6 7$OC=7.0E-7 10$PC=3.8E-8 6$IPC=0.0001494 30
169YB cG |a(K)exp=4.9|*10{+-4} {I16}
169YB G 1524.77 5 2.19 11E1(+M2) +0.03 4 9.26E-424 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.465 25
169YB2 G A2=+0.263 83 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000610 20$LC=8.22E-5 29$MC=1.81E-5 7
169YBS G NC=4.25E-6 15$OC=6.09E-7 22$PC=3.31E-8 12$IPC=0.0002105 30
169YB cG |a(K)exp=5.4|*10{+-4} {I14}
169YB G 1554.4 5 0.46 11 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.098 23
169YB G 1645.14 8 0.339 21M1+E2 +0.34 +21-150.0022310 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.072 5
169YB2 G A2=+0.62 19 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00176 8$LC=0.000250 12$MC=5.54E-5 26
169YBS G NC=1.30E-5 6$OC=1.87E-6 9$PC=1.03E-7 5$IPC=0.000154 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I11}
169YB L 1781.696 22 7/2-
169YB E 3.25 87.111 15 3.25 8
169YBS E CK=0.8025 6$CL=0.14892 32$CM+=0.04860 17
169YB G 703.33 10 0.52 6 M1 0.0171724
169YB2 G %IG=0.110 13
169YBS G KC=0.01446 20$LC=0.002109 30$MC=0.000470 7
169YBS G NC=0.0001103 15$OC=1.584E-5 22$PC=8.60E-7 12
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.019 {I7}
169YB G 821.18 4 1.35 5 M1(+E2) +0.13 +31-130.0116 9 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.287 12
169YB2 G A2=-0.523 89 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0097 8$LC=0.00141 10$MC=0.000315 21
169YBS G NC=7.4E-5 5$OC=1.06E-5 8$PC=5.8E-7 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I10}
169YB G 862.4 5 0.15 8 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.008 {I6} for doublet.
169YB G 1392.27 4 5.11 E2 1.97E-3 3 @
169YB2 G %IG=1.085 19
169YBS G KC=0.001624 23$LC=0.0002392 33$MC=5.34E-5 7
169YBS G NC=1.249E-5 17$OC=1.771E-6 25$PC=9.14E-8 13$IPC=3.89E-5 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} for doublet
169YB G 1502.89 6 0.92 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.195 11
169YB2 G A2=-0.461 62 (1982Da23)
169YB cG Multipolarity cannot be determined with available
169YB2cG data (|a(K)exp=0.0020 {I6}; |d=+0.03 {I+10-8} or +1.03 {I18} from
169YB3cG nuclear orientation (1982Da23)).
169YB G 1590.35 5 2.05 8 M1+E2 +0.117 23 2.45E-3 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.435 19
169YB2 G A2=-0.104 43 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.001966 28$LC=0.000279 4$MC=6.20E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.456E-5 21$OC=2.096E-6 30$PC=1.151E-7 16$IPC=0.0001300 18
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0020 {I5}
169YB G 1682.49 5 1.25 13M1+E2 +0.53 +8-6 0.00206 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.265 28
169YB2 G A2=-0.439 75 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00160 4$LC=0.000227 5$MC=5.05E-5 12
169YBS G NC=1.185E-5 28$OC=1.70E-6 4$PC=9.31E-8 23$IPC=0.0001677 30
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I7}
169YB G 1781.75 5 4.01 11E1+M2 +0.08 +6-5 0.00097 4 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.851 28
169YB2 G A2=-0.490 35 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00049 4$LC=6.6E-5 6$MC=1.44E-5 13
169YBS G NC=3.38E-6 30$OC=4.9E-7 4$PC=2.66E-8 24$IPC=0.000399 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=6.2|*10{+-4} {I13}
169YB L 1888.00 6 (7/2+,9/2+)
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.35 37.850 39 0.35 3
169YBS E CK=0.7922 7$CL=0.15630 44$CM+=0.05147 22
169YB G 817.6 4 0.90 4 D
169YB2 G %IG=0.191 9
169YB G 1055.8 4 0.35 12
169YB2 G %IG=0.074 26
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0036 {I20}
169YB G 1127.1 6 A
169YB cG Seen only in ce spectrum (1976Ba61).
169YB G 1726.30 9 0.26 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.055 6
169YB G 1817.12 7 0.145 10
169YB2 G %IG=0.0308 22
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I15}
169YB L 1908.63 3 5/2+
169YB E 2.12 97.016 22 2.12 9
169YBS E CK=0.7895 8$CL=0.15830 47$CM+=0.05225 23
169YB G 1146.92 13 0.31 6 (M1) 0.00513 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.066 13
169YBS G KC=0.00433 6$LC=0.000621 9$MC=0.0001380 19
169YBS G NC=3.24E-5 5$OC=4.66E-6 7$PC=2.55E-7 4$IPC=1.645E-6 24
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0039 {I16}
169YB G 1260.86 6 1.36 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.289 18
169YB G 1318.53 12 0.55 5(M1) 0.00368 5 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.117 11
169YBL G FL=590.67
169YBS G KC=0.00309 4$LC=0.000441 6$MC=9.81E-5 14
169YBS G NC=2.303E-5 32$OC=3.31E-6 5$PC=1.816E-7 25$IPC=2.77E-5 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0029 {I9} for doublet.
169YB G 1338.82 4 6.93 21E1+M2 -0.04 3 9.85E-428 K
169YB2 G %IG=1.47 5
169YB2 G A2=-0.383 36 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000766 23$LC=0.0001039 35$MC=2.29E-5 8
169YBS G NC=5.37E-6 18$OC=7.68E-7 26$PC=4.16E-8 14$IPC=8.61E-5 12
169YB cG |a(K)exp=8.5|*10{+-4} {I20}
169YB G 1630.02 13 0.28 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.059 11
169YB G 1717.41 6 0.48 4
169YB2 G %IG=0.102 9
169YB G 1908.46 6 0.354 20(M1,E2) 0.0015626
169YB2 G %IG=0.075 4
169YB2 G A2=+0.13 24 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00110 19$LC=0.000155 27$MC=3.4E-5 6
169YBS G NC=8.1E-6 14$OC=1.16E-6 20$PC=6.3E-8 12$IPC=0.000269 32
169YB cG MR 1982Da23 (nuclear orientation) report |d=0.00 {I18}
169YB2cG or |d|>3.0.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I5}
169YB L 1954.50 4 5/2-,7/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.57 47.458 34 0.57 4
169YBS E CK=0.7818 10$CL=0.1638 6$CM+=0.05440 27
169YB G 875.9 0.15 8 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.012 {I8} for doublet.
169YB G 883.81 9 0.35 7
169YB2 G %IG=0.074 15
169YB cG Alternative placement from 1716 level, as suggested
169YB2cG by 1978Ba73, not likely. Additional intensity to 832 level
169YB3cG would make intensity balance there negative.
169YB G 993.96 13 0.23 7 (M1) 0.0072710
169YB2 G %IG=0.049 15
169YBS G KC=0.00613 9$LC=0.000884 12$MC=0.0001967 28
169YBS G NC=4.62E-5 6$OC=6.64E-6 9$PC=3.62E-7 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0068 {I25}
169YB G 1122.21 7 0.66 8
169YB2 G %IG=0.140 17
169YBL G FL=832.085
169YB cG |a(K)exp<0.0016
169YB G 1676.46 8 0.378 18M1 2.23E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.080 4
169YBL G FL=278.594
169YBS G KC=0.001743 24$LC=0.0002471 35$MC=5.49E-5 8
169YBS G NC=1.289E-5 18$OC=1.855E-6 26$PC=1.020E-7 14$IPC=0.0001728 24
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I7}
169YB G 1763.35 5 0.79 4 M1(+E2) 0.0017332
169YB2 G %IG=0.168 9
169YBS G KC=0.00130 25$LC=0.000184 35$MC=4.1E-5 8
169YBS G NC=9.6E-6 18$OC=1.38E-6 27$PC=7.5E-8 16$IPC=0.000196 23
169YB cG $A{-2}=+0.32 {I13} for spin 7/2 or +0.30 {I12} for spin 5/2 (1982Da23)
169YB cG M |d=-0.8 {I+2-4} (if J(1954.6 level)=5/2) or |d=0.00 {I7} (if
169YB2cG J=7/2) (nuclear orientation, 1982Da23) suggests E2 admixture.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0021 {I6}
169YB G 1954.48 9 0.184 12
169YB2 G %IG=0.0391 26
169YB L 1972.35 8 9/2-
169YB cL Level not included in 1988DzZW.
169YB E 0.41 67.55 7 0.41 6
169YBS E CK=0.778 1$CL=0.1665 7$CM+=0.05545 29
169YB G 1043.20 8 0.65 5 M1+E2 -1.1 7 0.0048 13 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.138 11
169YB2 G A2=-0.60 19 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0040 11$LC=0.00060 14$MC=0.000133 31
169YBS G NC=3.1E-5 7$OC=4.4E-6 11$PC=2.3E-7 7
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0047 {I7}
169YB G 1223.07 8 0.48 12 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.102 26
169YBL G FL=748.923
169YB G 1707.97 9 0.95 (M1+E2) 0.0018135 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.202 4
169YBS G KC=0.00139 28$LC=0.00020 4$MC=4.4E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.03E-5 20$OC=1.48E-6 30$PC=8.0E-8 18$IPC=0.000169 20
169YB G 1810.64 13 0.104 18
169YB2 G %IG=0.022 4
169YB L 1973.97 3 7/2-
169YB E 1.02 97.144 41 1.02 9
169YBS E CK=0.7777 11$CL=0.1668 7$CM+=0.05556 29
169YB G 419.39 8 0.155 14
169YB2 G %IG=0.0329 30
169YBL G FL=1554.876
169YB G 895.82 11 0.61 21
169YB2 G %IG=0.13 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.006 {I3}
169YB G 1013.08 10 0.34 6 (M1) 0.0069410
169YB2 G %IG=0.072 13
169YBS G KC=0.00586 8$LC=0.000843 12$MC=0.0001876 26
169YBS G NC=4.41E-5 6$OC=6.33E-6 9$PC=3.46E-7 5
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.011 {I4}
169YB G 1251.74 25 0.28 9 (E2) 2.38E-3 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.059 19
169YBS G KC=0.001988 28$LC=0.000298 4$MC=6.67E-5 9
169YBS G NC=1.561E-5 22$OC=2.204E-6 31$PC=1.119E-7 16$IPC=1.112E-5 16
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0026 {I10}
169YB G 1326.85 3 0.48 E1 9.81E-414 @
169YB2 G %IG=0.1019 18
169YBL G FL=647.34
169YBS G KC=0.000768 11$LC=0.0001040 15$MC=2.296E-5 32
169YBS G NC=5.38E-6 8$OC=7.69E-7 11$PC=4.16E-8 6$IPC=7.94E-5 11
169YB G 1487.21 24 0.155 20
169YB2 G %IG=0.033 4
169YB G 1710.17 10 1.2 3
169YB2 G %IG=0.25 6
169YBL G FL=264.272
169YB G 1730.8 6 0.09 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.019 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.005 {I3}
169YB G 1903.04 5 0.308 16(E1(+M2)) +0.08 15 0.0010012 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.065 4
169YB2 G A2=+0.27 21 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=4.4E-4 11$LC=5.9E-5 16$MC=1.3E-5 4
169YBS G NC=3.0E-6 9$OC=4.3E-7 12$PC=2.4E-8 7$IPC=0.000488 17
169YB cG Placement from 1982Da23.
169YB cG M from nuclear orientation, with |D|p=yes from decay scheme.
169YB G 1973.68 6 1.21 4 (E1+M2) -0.13 +9-8 0.00104 6 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.257 10
169YB2 G A2=-0.426 65 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.00043 6$LC=5.9E-5 9$MC=1.29E-5 20
169YBS G NC=3.0E-6 5$OC=4.3E-7 7$PC=2.4E-8 4$IPC=0.000535 12
169YB cG M$from nuclear orientation, with |D|p=yes from decay scheme.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=7|*10{+-4} {I4}
169YB L 2029.87 4 7/2-
169YB E 1.14 66.893 29 1.14 6
169YBS E CK=0.7615 15$CL=0.1784 10$CM+=0.06012 39
169YB G 862.4 5 0.15 8 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.032 17
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.008 {I6} for doublet.
169YB G 1109.99 7 0.79 4 M1+E2 -0.19 +24-370.0055 5 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.168 9
169YB2 G A2=-0.11 34 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.0046 4$LC=0.00066 6$MC=0.000147 13
169YBS G NC=3.46E-5 31$OC=5.0E-6 5$PC=2.72E-7 28$IPC=4.48E-7 21
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0049 {I8}
169YB G 1223.07 8 0.48 12 &
169YB2 G %IG=0.102 26
169YB G 1751.2 4 0.058 14
169YB2 G %IG=0.0123 30
169YB G 1838.30 8 0.150 9
169YB2 G %IG=0.0318 20
169YBL G FL=191.216
169YB G 1959.24 9 1.18 4 (E1(+M2)) +0.03 4 1.00E-3 2 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.250 10
169YB2 G A2=+0.199 64 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000403 11$LC=5.39E-5 16$MC=1.187E-5 35
169YBS G NC=2.78E-6 8$OC=3.99E-7 12$PC=2.19E-8 6$IPC=0.000531 8
169YB cG M from nuclear orientation, with |D|p=yes from decay scheme.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0010 {I3}
169YB G 2030.00 6 2.89 8 (E1(+M2)) +0.03 5 1.03E-3 2 K
169YB2 G %IG=0.613 20
169YB2 G A2=-0.457 33 (1982Da23)
169YBS G KC=0.000380 13$LC=5.08E-5 19$MC=1.12E-5 4
169YBS G NC=2.62E-6 10$OC=3.77E-7 14$PC=2.07E-8 8$IPC=0.000581 8
169YB cG M from nuclear orientation, with |D|p=yes from decay scheme.
169YB cG |a(K)exp=2.4|*10{+-4} {I13}
169YB L 2065.04 11 7/2+
169YB E 0.0125 118.697 43 0.0125 11
169YBS E CK=0.7458 21$CL=0.1897 14$CM+=0.0645 5
169YB G 2065.03 11 0.059 5 M1+E2+E0 0.0073
169YB2 G %IG=0.0125 11
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0062 {I16}
169YB cG Placement from 1991DzZY.
169YB cG CC estimated from |a(K)exp (1978Ba73) and K/L for E0 transitions
169YB5cG (2020Do01 - K/L=5.7 for 1543|g of {+168}Yb).
169YB L 2101.03 7 (5/2,7/2)-
169YB E 0.072 57.740 38 0.072 5
169YBS E CK=0.7209 31$CL=0.2074 21$CM+=0.0717 7
169YB G 1822.42 11 0.150 10 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.0318 22
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.00063 {I22}; consistent with E1 or E2.
169YB G 2014.06 9 0.135 16M1,E2 0.0014822 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.0287 34
169YBS G KC=0.00098 16$LC=0.000138 22$MC=3.1E-5 5
169YBS G NC=7.2E-6 12$OC=1.03E-6 17$PC=5.6E-8 10$IPC=0.00032 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0012 {I7}
169YB G 2101.09 13 0.053 4 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.0112 9
169YB cG |a(K)exp<0.003
169YB L 2135.4 4
169YB E 0.0070 118.51 7 0.0070 11
169YBS E CK=0.680 5$CL=0.2362 37$CM+=0.0834 14
169YB G 2135.4 4 0.033 5
169YB2 G %IG=0.0070 11
169YB cG Placement from 1991DzZY.
169YB L 2287.23 5 7/2-
169YB cL %|e+%|b{++}=0.281 {I11} implied; however decay energy too
169YB2cL low for K or L1 or L2 capture. Calculated log| {Ift} unrealistic.
169YB G 1367.56 7 0.64 4 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.136 9
169YB G 1897.60 10 0.137 8 M1 1.83E-3 3 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.0291 18
169YBS G KC=0.001301 18$LC=0.0001838 26$MC=4.08E-5 6
169YBS G NC=9.58E-6 13$OC=1.380E-6 19$PC=7.60E-8 11$IPC=0.000295 4
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0048 {I12}
169YB G 2095.90 7 0.549 19M1 1.63E-3 2 N
169YB2 G %IG=0.117 5
169YBS G KC=0.001031 14$LC=0.0001452 20$MC=3.22E-5 5
169YBS G NC=7.57E-6 11$OC=1.090E-6 15$PC=6.02E-8 8$IPC=0.000412 6
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0018 {I6}
169YB L 2296.78 15 5/2-,7/2-,9/2- ?
169YB cL %|e+%|b{++}=0.083 {I14} implied; however level energy |>Q
169YB2cL value. Consequently, level is indicated as uncertain, as are the
169YB3cL placements of all transitions deexciting it.
169YB G 847.9 7 0.10 5 M1 0.0107615 N ?
169YB2 G %IG=0.021 11
169YBS G KC=0.00907 13$LC=0.001315 19$MC=0.000293 4
169YBS G NC=6.87E-5 10$OC=9.88E-6 14$PC=5.37E-7 8
169YB cG |a(K)exp=0.009 {I6}
169YB G 1547.69 18 0.23 3 N ?
169YB2 G %IG=0.049 6
169YB G 2018.40 27 0.062 19 N ?
169YB2 G %IG=0.013 4