168LU    168LU IT DECAY                1999BA65,1997BA26         10NDS    201008
168LU  H TYP=FUL$AUT=CORAL M. BAGLIN$CIT=NDS 111, 1807 (2010)$CUT=15-Jun-2010$
168LU C  OTHER: 1972CH44.
168LU C            CANDIDATES FOR THE 168LU ISOMERIC TRANSITION HAVE BEEN
168LU2C  REPORTED BY 1997BA26 IN G SPECTRA FOLLOWING 168HF EC DECAY AND BY
168LU3C  1999BA65 IN G SPECTRA FROM AN ISOMERIC 168LU SOURCE.  THE RESPECTIVE
168LU4C  EG DATA (202.81 12 IN 1997BA26 AND 202.5 4 IN 1999BA65) AND %IG DATA
168LU5C  (0.86 21 FROM 1997BA26 AND 0.54 15 FROM 1999BA65) ARE CONSISTENT,
168LU6C  AND THE TRANSITION IS NOT COINCIDENT WITH 168YB TRANSITIONS. HOWEVER,
168LU7C  THE PRINCIPAL TRANSITIONS EXPECTED FROM 168LU(GS) EC DECAY WERE NOT
168LU8C  OBSERVED BY 1999BA65 AND, CONSEQUENTLY, THE AUTHORS PROPOSE ONLY AN
168LU9C  UPPER LIMIT FOR %IT, NAMELY 0.8%.  OTHER %IT: <5 (1972CH44).
168LU CL E         FROM EG.
168LU CL J,T       FROM Adopted Levels.
168LU  P 202.81    12 3+               6.7 M     4
168LU  N 1.0          1.0      0.008   LT
168LU CN BR        FROM 1999BA65; SEE GENERAL COMMENT ABOVE.
168LU PN                                                                     3
168LU  L  0.0         6(-)             5.5 M     1
168LU  L  202.81   12 3+               6.7 M     4                           M ?
168LU CL E         UNCERTAIN BECAUSE IDENTIFICATION OF ISOMERIC TRANSITION
168LU2CL IS VERY TENTATIVE.
168LU  G 202.81    12          [E3]                    1.83     100            ?
168LUS G K/T=0.177 3$L/T=0.355 5$M/T=0.0906 15$N+/T=0.0236 4
168LUS G N/T=0.0210 4$O/T=0.00256 5$P/T=1.426E-5 24
168LU CG E         FROM 1997BA26; 202.5 4 IN 1999BA65, 202.8 IN 1966HA23.
168LU CG M         TRANSITION IS SIGNIFICANTLY CONVERTED (1966HA23).