167TM 167YB EC DECAY (17.5 M) 1971FU10,1971GOYX 23NDS 202309
167TM H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 191, 1 (2023)$
167TM2 H CUT=22-Aug-2023$
167TM c 1971Fu10 (also 1970Wi09): {+167}Yb produced in {+168}Yb(|g,n),
167TM2c E(|g)=bremsstrahlung generated by a 30-MeV electron accelerator, using
167TM3c 20% enriched {+168}Yb target. {+167}Yb was also produced in spallation
167TM4c reaction using E(p)=680 MeV, followed by chemical separation. Measured
167TM5c E|g, I|g using several Ge(Li) detectors, a high-resolution low-energy
167TM6c photon spectrometer (LEPS) for x-rays, conversion electrons using a
167TM7c magnetic spectrograph, prompt and delayed |g|g-coin using
167TM8c Ge(Li)-Ge(Li) and Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detectors. 1970Wi09 is (|a,2n|g)
167TM9c study for levels and band structures in {+167}Tm, but also contains
167TMAc a decay scheme figure for {+167}Yb decay, nearly the same as in
167TMBc 1971Fu10. A Dubna report E6-4782 (1969) by A.A. Abdurazakov et al.
167TMCc is cited by 1971Fu10 as an earlier report of their results for {+167}Yb
167TMDc decay. 1971Fu10 also cite another report of independent decay study by
167TMEc R. Goles, Michigan State University, Nucl. Chem. Annual report p79
167TMFc (1969), related to 1971GoYX thesis.
167TM c 1971GoYX (Thesis): {+167}Yb produced in {+169}Tm(p,3n),E(p)=23.5 MeV
167TM2c at the Michigan State University Sector-focused cyclotron facility.
167TM3c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin using Ge(Li) detector for singles and
167TM4c Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) detector system for coincidences. 52 new |g rays were
167TM5c detected in this experiment and a detailed decay scheme proposed,
167TM6c with levels discussed in terms of Nilsson configurations, together
167TM7c with their results of {+169}Tm(p,t) experiment. 1971GoYG is the
167TM8c same as 1971GoYX. Results were also reported earlier by R. Goles,
167TM9c in Michigan State University, Nucl. Chem. Annual report p79 (1969).
167TM d 1971GoZG and 1971GoZE are superseded by 1971GoYX
167TM c Note: 1971GoYX was not cited in the 2000 or 1976 NDS-evaluation of this
167TM2c decay
167TM c Others:
167TM c 1993AbZZ (also 1981AbZR): measured E|g, ce using magnetic
167TM2c spectrographs. Copy of this report was not available
167TM c 1987BaZB (one author same as in 1993AbZZ): measured L1/L2 and L1/L3
167TM2c ratios for 37.05 and 113.36 transitions using magnetic spectrographs.
167TM c 1978Cr06: measured E|b and branching ratio |e/|b{++}
167TM c 1967Pa04, 1966Pa17: measured E|g, E(ce), L-subshell ratios. A total of
167TM2c 15 |g rays reported with ce data for seven transitions.
167TM c 1965Gr20: copy of this paper was not available
167TM c 1965Ta01: {+167}Yb from {+168}Yb(|g,n),E(|g)=15 MeV bremsstrahlung from
167TM2c JAERI linear accelerator. Measured E|b, I|b, E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin,
167TM3c (x ray)|g-coin, |b{++}|g-coin, level half-lives by |g|g(t). Data for
167TM4c five |g rays from 62.9-1050 keV, and |b{++} decay branching of 0.2%.
167TM c 1964Wa04: copy of this paper was not available
167TM c 1960Wi15: {+167}Yb from {+164}Er(|a,n),E(|a)=17,24 MeV. Measured E|g,
167TM2c I|g, |g|g-coin, T{-1/2} of {+167}Yb decay. Three |g rays of 106, 113
167TM3c and 176 keV reported. Analyzed conversion electron data from 1959Ha09
167TM c 1960Ba32: measured conversion electron spectrum.
167TM2c Copy of this paper was not available
167TM c 1959Ha09: measured conversion electrons for nine transitions from
167TM2c 25.8 to 176.2 keV at ORNL cyclotron facility.
167TM c 1958Ar59: copy of this paper was not available
167TM c 1954Ha16 (from the same research group as 1959Ha09): identification of
167TM2c {+167}Yb activity through parent-daughter half-lives and excitation
167TM3c function measurement in {+169}Tm(p,3n){+167}Yb,E(p)=19-23 MeV reaction.
167TM4c Measured half-life of 18.5 min, and E|g=118 keV, 0.18 MeV and 0.33 MeV
167TM5c in a |g-ray spectrum using NaI(Tl) scintillation detector. No
167TM6c annihilation radiation was observed indicating small contribution from
167TM7c positron emission. 1954Ha16 did not confirm an earlier activity of 73
167TM8c min assigned to {+167}Yb decay by L. Michel (University of California
167TM9c Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-2267) at Berkeley cyclotron facility.
167TM c Theory for decay of {+167}Yb: 1975Fe13.
167TM c All data are from 1971Fu10, unless otherwise indicated
167TM cE TI$|e+|b{++} feedings are from intensity imbalance at each
167TM2cE level. It is assumed that there is no direct |e feeding to
167TM3cE the g.s. or the 10.4 level.
167TM cG $I|g(Tm K| x ray)|?1220, relative to I|g=100 for 176.2|g(1960Wi15),
167TM2cG which can be compared with deduced I|g(Tm K| x ray)=911 from the
167TM3cG present decay scheme
167TM cG $Uncertainty in relative conversion electron intensities=20-30%
167TM2cG (1971Fu10).
167TM cG E,RI$From 1971Fu10 unless otherwise indicated. Values from 1971GoYX
167TM2cG are listed under comments for comparison, with author's relative
167TM3cG intensities renormalized to 100 for the 176.31|g by dividing each
167TM4cG intensity in Table 9.2 in 1971GoYX by a factor of 24.2. Note that
167TM5cG uncertainties for intensities are not available in 1971GoYX.
167TM cG E(x),RI(x)$This |g from 1971GoYX only.
167TM cG E(y),RI(y)$Tentative |g from 1971GoYX only.
167TM cG E(z)$From 1993AbZZ
167TM cG M,MR$From |a(K)exp and/or ce subshell ratios, except where noted;
167TM2cG the photon and ce intensity scales were normalized through
167TM3cG |a(K)=2.23 (M1+E2 theory, |d=0.090) for 106.2|g. Uncertainties in I(ce)
167TM4cG data quoted from 1971Fu10 are typically 20-30%, but at low energies
167TM5cG they may be much larger. Where no such data are available, the
167TM6cG assignments are from the Adopted Gammas. Quoted values are the same
167TM7cG as those in Adopted Gammas
167TM cL $Following levels proposed by 1971GoYX are omitted due to lack of
167TM2cL confirmation in 1971Fu10: 321.7, 1318.9, 1458.0 1534.7 and 1603.0,
167TM3cL while a 1544.2 level proposed only in 1971GoYX is included in the decay
167TM4cL scheme here as three out of four |g rays placed by 1971GoYX are also
167TM5cL reported as unplaced |g rays in 1971Fu10, with comparable intensities
167TM6cL in the two independent studies.
167TM cL E$From least squares fit to E|g data
167TM cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels
167TM cL BAND(A)$|p1/2[411] band.
167TM cL BAND(B)$|p1/2[541] band.
167TM cL BAND(C)$|p7/2[404] band.
167TM cL BAND(D)$|p7/2[523] band.
167TM cL BAND(E)$|p3/2[411] band.
167TM cL BAND(F)$|p5/2[402] band.
167YB P 0.0 5/2- 17.5 M 2 1953 4
167YB cP J,T$From {+167}Yb Adopted Levels. Configuration=|n5/2[523]
167YB cP QP$From 2021Wa16
167TM N 0.208 8 0.208 8 1.0 1.0
167TM cN NR$From I(|g+ce to g.s.)+I(|g+ce to 10.4 level)=100% from levels above
167TM2cN 10.4 level, assuming no |e feeding from 5/2- parent to 1/2+, g.s. or
167TM3cN 3/2+, 10.4 level (log {If{+1u}t}>8.5 implies %(|e+|b{++})<0.2 to g.s.;
167TM4cN log {Ift}|>5.9 implies %(|e+|b{++})|<6.5 to 10.4 level). In addition,
167TM5cN |e+|b{++} feeding to the g.s., 1/2+ and 10.4, 3/2+ members of K|p=1/2+,
167TM6cN |p1/2[411] is K-forbidden from the {+167}Yb g.s., J|p=5/2- parent with
167TM7cN configuration=K|p=5/2-, |n5/2[523], as exemplified by no evidence
167TM8cN of |e+|b{++} feeding to the 5/2+ and 7/2+ members of the |p1/2[411]
167TM9cN band in {+167}Tm. There are many unplaced |g rays, but most of
167TMAcN the confirmed ones are weak, adding to total estimated transition
167TMBcN intensity of about 2%, well within the 4% uncertainty for the
167TMCcN |g-normalization factor.
167TM PN 3
167TM G 71.30 3 z
167TM cG $Ice(L1)/Ice(M1)=1.2 {I2}/0.3 {I1} (1993AbZZ)
167TM cG $All |d values possible for mult=M1+E2 or E1+M2 from L1/M1 ratio
167TM cG E$from 1993AbZZ. Proposed placement from 188 level by 1993AbZZ
167TM2cG disagrees with level-energy difference of 71.05 keV {I2}
167TM G 87.54 4 z
167TM cG $Ice(L1)/Ice(M1)=2.0 {I2}/0.5 {I2} (1993AbZZ)
167TM cG $No meaningful |d value for mult=M1+E2 or E1+M2 from L1/M1 ratio
167TM cG E$from 1993AbZZ. Proposed placement from 383 level by 1993AbZZ is
167TM2cG considered incorrect as measured Ice(L1)=2.0 {I3} and Ice(M1)=0.5 {I2}
167TM3cG (1993AbZZ) imply I(|g+ce)=74 {I8} if mult=E1, giving %(|e+|b{++})=15
167TM5cG for a |DJ=2, |D|p=no |b transition to the 383 level and a
167TM6cG non-physical -15% branch for the 296 level, both of which are unlikely
167TM7cG scenarios. Additionally, this transition was not reported in (|a,2n|g)
167TM8cG work (1980Ol05), whereas the 91|g from the 383 level is strong in
167TM9cG this work
167TM G 156.5 5 0.25 y
167TM2 G %IG=0.0520
167TM G 162.6 6 1.04 y
167TM2 G %IG=0.216
167TM G 184.0 5 0.072 y
167TM2 G %IG=0.0150
167TM G 198.3 5 0.069 y
167TM2 G %IG=0.0144
167TM G 218.6 3 0.48 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.100
167TM G 225.7 4 0.60 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.125
167TM G 282.1 2 0.53 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.110
167TM G 290.0 5 0.60 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.125
167TM G 321.1 5 0.011 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0023 11
167TM G 323.5 5 0.017 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0035 11
167TM G 343.29 8 0.167 20
167TM2 G %IG=0.035 4
167TM cG $E|g=343.3 {I2}, I|g=0.129 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 351.8 4 0.016 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0033 13
167TM cG $E|g=351.8 {I2}, I|g=0.089 (1971GoYX, tentative)
167TM G 375.9 2 0.033 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0069 17
167TM G 387.0 4 0.011 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0023 11
167TM G 398.1 2 0.023 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0048 11
167TM G 421.4 2 0.020 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 11
167TM G 446.8 3 0.012 4
167TM2 G %IG=0.0025 8
167TM cG $E|g=447.1 {I3}, I|g=0.038 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 457.0 1 0.033 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0069 15
167TM cG $E|g=457.0 {I5}, I|g=0.085 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 486.6 2 0.033 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0069 17
167TM G 541.4 2 0.022 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0046 13
167TM cG $E|g=541.5 {I3}, I|g=0.033 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 561.8 4 0.014 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0029 11
167TM G 590.9 4 0.023 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0048 17
167TM G 600.2 4 0.020 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 13
167TM G 664.9 2 0.044 12
167TM2 G %IG=0.0092 25
167TM cG $E|g=665.1 {I5}, I|g=0.029 (1971GoYX, tentative)
167TM G 686.9 5 0.026 13
167TM2 G %IG=0.0054 27
167TM cG $E|g=687.1 {I2}, I|g=0.025 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 694.5 6 0.020 13
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 27
167TM cG $E|g=694.1 {I4}, I|g=0.033 (1971GoYX, tentative)
167TM G 695.6 4 0.021 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00437
167TM G 697.1 6 0.020 14
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 29
167TM cG $E|g=697.3 {I4}, I|g=0.045 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 719.5 3 0.019 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0040 13
167TM cG $E|g=719.7 {I4}, I|g=0.048 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 791.5 2 0.063 12
167TM2 G %IG=0.0131 26
167TM cG $E|g=791.6 {I2}, I|g=0.076 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 794.2 5 0.011 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00229
167TM G 815.9 3 0.039 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.0081
167TM G 829.4 3 0.034 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.0071 19
167TM cG $E|g=829.3 {I3}, I|g=0.070 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 905.3 3 0.020 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00416
167TM G 927.1 8 0.020 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 19
167TM G 970.8 4 0.031 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00645
167TM G 977.9 3 0.021 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0044 15
167TM G 998.3 3 0.021 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0044 15
167TM cG $E|g=998.4 {I2}, I|g=0.038 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1008.6 5 0.018 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0037 15
167TM cG $E|g=1009.0 {I2}, I|g=0.034 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1025.9 3 0.022 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0046 17
167TM cG $E|g=1026.2 {I2}, I|g=0.029 (1971GoYX; placed from a 1319 level)
167TM G 1068.2 4 0.034 13
167TM2 G %IG=0.0071 27
167TM cG $E|g=1067.6 {I3}, I|g=0.040 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1070.3 6 0.017 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0035 21
167TM cG $E|g=1069.5 {I3}, I|g=0.042 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1137.1 5 0.024 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00499
167TM cG $Tentative placement from an uncertain 321.7 level in 1971GoYX
167TM G 1165.5 4 0.015 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0031 13
167TM cG $E|g=1165.7 {I4} (1971GoYX, placed from a 1458 level)
167TM G 1242.0 1 0.081 14
167TM2 G %IG=0.0169 30
167TM cG $E|g=1241.9 {I2}, I|g=0.123 (1971GoYX, placed from a 1535 level)
167TM G 1320.9 1 0.061 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0127 21
167TM cG $E|g=1320.8 {I2}, I|g=0.097 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1342.4 4 0.019 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0040 15
167TM cG $E|g=1342.3 {I4}, I|g=0.032 (1971GoYX, placed from a 1458 level)
167TM G 1355.3 3 0.014 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00291
167TM cG $|g placed from a 1535 level in 1971GoYX
167TM G 1366.5 7 0.015 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0031 13
167TM cG $E|g=1365.5 {I5}, I|g=0.020 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1370.2 1 0.058 11
167TM2 G %IG=0.0121 23
167TM cG $E|g=1369.9 {I2}, I|g=0.081 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1433.7 3 0.014 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0029 11
167TM cG $E|g=1433.5 {I4}, I|g=0.012 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1460.7 4 0.013 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00270
167TM cG $|g placed from a 1597 level in 1971GoYX
167TM G 1486.5 3 0.034 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00707
167TM cG $|g placed from a 1597 level in 1971GoYX
167TM G 1498.2 3 0.020 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 13
167TM cG $E|g=1498.1 {I2}, I|g=0.033 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1509.0 5 0.013 x
167TM2 G %IG=0.00270
167TM G 1525.7 3 0.010 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0021 6
167TM cG $E|g=1525.5 {I3}, I|g=0.012 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1542.0 5 0.005 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0010 6
167TM G 1549.5 4 0.006 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0013 6
167TM G 1631.7 3 0.007 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0015 6
167TM cG $E|g=1631.9 {I2}, I|g=0.015 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1675.0 7 0.003 2
167TM2 G %IG=0.0006 4
167TM G 1680.7 6 0.005 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0010 6
167TM cG $E|g=1681.0 {I5} (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1693.6 5 0.004 2
167TM2 G %IG=0.0008 4
167TM cG $E|g=1694.9 {I5} (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1793.4 6 0.003 2
167TM2 G %IG=0.0006 4
167TM G 1807.8 5 0.006 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0013 6
167TM cG $E|g=1808.0 {I5} (1971GoYX)
167TM L 0.0 1/2+ 9.25 D 2 A
167TM L 10.412 17 3/2+ 0.95 NS 5 A
167TM cL T$ce|g(t) and |g|g(t) (1980AlZE).
167TM G 10.419 25 0.68 5 M1+E2 0.043 +4-3 648 38 442 19
167TM2 G %IG=0.141 12
167TM cG E$weighted average of 10.45 {I5} (1993AbZZ), 10.41 {I3}
167TM2cG (116.57 {I2}-106.16 {I2}), 10.43 {I11} (171.75 {I8}-161.32 {I8})
167TM2cG 10.3 {I3} (272.1 {I2}-282.4 {I2}), and 10.36 {I21}
167TM4cG (290.86 {I7}- 280.5 {I2}). Differences of the same |g-ray energies in
167TM5cG (|a,2n|g) and (p,n|g) cannot be used as for each set one |g ray
167TM6cG is a doublet. The same value is recommended in the Adopted Gammas
167TM cG $Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=43 {I5}:14 {I2}:21 {I3} (1993AbZZ,1981AbZR)
167TM cG M,MR$from M-subshell ratios. The same value is recommended in the
167TM2cG Adopted Gammas
167TM cG RI$from |a and I(|g+ce)=442 {I19} (deduced from transition intensity
167TM2cG balance at the 10.4 level), assuming no |e+|b{++} feeding to this level
167TMS G LC=503 37 $ MC=115 9 $ NC=26.4 20$ OC=3.47 23$ PC=0.1254 20
167TM cG $Thanks to Tibor Kibedi (ANU) who provided (Aug 15, 2021) calculated
167TM2cG total theoretical conversion coefficients for L-, M-, N-, O- and
167TM3cG P-shells, as well as subshells using "BrIccRaine" computer code.
167TM L 116.564 16 5/2+ 66 PS 7 A
167TM cL T$other: |<100 ps from (ce)|g(t) and |g|g(t) (1980AlZE)
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=3 {I12}. No
167TM2cE feeding expected from K-forbiddenness
167TM G 106.16 2 110 5 M1+E2 0.116 +27-20 2.61 4
167TM2 G %IG=22.9 14
167TM cG $E|g=106.14 {I5}, I|g=197 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=240:40:4.2:1.5:6.6:0.86:0.33:0.33 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G K/L=6.1 20
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=37 {I7}:2.5 {I5}/1 (1965Gr20)
167TM cG MR$deduced from L-subshell ratio in 1965Gr20.
167TM2cG Other: 0.3 from sub-shell ratios in 1971Fu10
167TMS G KC=2.17 4$LC=0.342 8$MC=0.0767 18
167TMS G NC=0.0179 5 $OC=0.00255 5$PC=0.0001330 20
167TM G 116.57 2 13.8 3 E2 1.727 24
167TM2 G %IG=2.87 13
167TM cG $E|g=116.55 {I5}, I|g=23.3 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=9.7 10:0.86 9:4.3 5:4.3 5 (1993AbZZ,
167TM2cG same values but without uncertainties in 1971Fu10)
167TM cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=9.7:0.86:4.3:4.3:0.14:0.75:0.31 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G K/L=0.87 10
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=1:5.5 {I10}: 5 {I1} (1965Gr20)
167TM2 G EKC=0.72 (1971Fu10)$ EKC=0.70 7 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.726 10$LC=0.767 11$MC=0.1872 26
167TMS G NC=0.0426 6$OC=0.00499 7$PC=3.05E-5 4
167TM L 142.404 19 7/2+ A
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=-1.5 {I23}. No
167TM2cE feeding expected from K-forbiddenness
167TM G 25.83 2 0.22 7 M1+E2 0.035 28.5 4
167TM2 G %IG=0.046 15
167TM cG $E|g=25.90 {I10} (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=|?0.2:|?0.2:|?0.5 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G LC=22.20 32$MC=4.98 7
167TMS G NC=1.162 16$OC=0.1643 23$PC=0.00841 12
167TM cG $|a=29.4 {I+23-14} for a 50% uncertainty in |d.
167TM cG RI$from I(|g+ce)=6.6 {I20} deduced from I(|g+ce)(132.0|g)=28.7 {I8}
167TM2cG and I(|g+ce)(25.8|g)/I(|g+ce)(132.0|g)=0.23 {I7} (1971Fu10, from |g|g
167TMxcG coin), assuming |a=29.4.
167TM cG M,MR$reported in 1981AbZR with no experimental details given.
167TM G 131.99 2 13.6 4 E2 1.098 15
167TM2 G %IG=2.83 14
167TM cG $E|g=132.01 {I5}, I|g=19.8 (1971GoYX)
167TM2 G EKC=0.48 (1971Fu10)
167TM cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=6.5 8:0.65 8:2.0 3:1.9 3 (1993AbZZ,
167TM2cG same values but without uncertainties in 1971Fu10)
167TM cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=6.5:0.65:2.0:1.9:0.32:0.33 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G K/L=1.3 2
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=1:5.0 {I10}:3.5 {I5} (1965Gr20)
167TMS G KC=0.525 7$LC=0.439 6$MC=0.1069 15
167TMS G NC=0.02434 34$OC=0.00287 4$PC=2.245E-5 31
167TM L 171.72 5 (1/2)- B
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=-0.09 {I15}.
167TM G 161.32 8 0.17 5 (E1) 0.0942 13
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.12 {I3} (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC=0.71 27 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.0788 11$LC=0.01204 17$MC=0.00268 4
167TMS G NC=0.000617 9$OC=8.41E-5 12$PC=3.76E-6 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.035 11
167TM cG $1993AbZZ assigned E1 suggesting that quoted I(ce) is high by an order
167TM2cG of magnitude.
167TM G 171.75 8 0.18 5 E1 0.0799 11
167TM cG $Ice(K)|?0.012 (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC AP 0.07 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.0669 9$LC=0.01016 14$MC=0.002258 32
167TMS G NC=0.000521 7$OC=7.12E-5 10$PC=3.21E-6 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.037 11
167TM cG M$|a(K)exp consistent with multipolarity from the Adopted Gammas.
167TM L 179.464 19 7/2+ 1.16 US 6 CM1
167TM cL T$from (x ray)|g(t) (1964Lo04). Other: 1.1 |ms {I1} (K-x ray)|g(t)
167TM2cL (1965Ta01).
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=0 {I12}.
167TM G 37.05 2 0.93 33 M1+E2 0.326 5 31.3 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.19 7
167TM cG $E|g=37.03 {I5} (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=1.00:1.43 6:1.64 5 (1987BaZB)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=2.5:3.5:4.0:1.0:1.1:1.2:0.4 (1971Fu10)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=1:1.15 {I10}:1.03 (1965Gr20)
167TMS G LC=24.1 6 $MC=5.74 15
167TMS G NC=1.31 4 $OC=0.159 4 $PC=0.00266 4
167TM cG RI$I(|g+ce)(37|g)=29 {I10} from I(|g+ce)(62.9|g)=317 {I54} and
167TM2cG I(|g+ce)(37.0|g)/I(|g+ce)(62.9|g)=0.09 {I3} (1971Fu10, from |g|g-coin).
167TM3cG Other: I|g(exp)=0.5 {I2} (in Table 1 of 1971Fu10)
167TM cG MR$deduced by evaluators from L-subshell data in 1987BaZB. Others:
167TM2cG |d=0.283 {I15} from L-subshell data in 1965Gr20, assuming 25%
167TM3cG uncertainty in L3/L1; 0.32 {I8} with L-subshell ratios from 1987BaZB
167TM4cG and 1965Gr20, but the fit is somewhat poor.
167TM G 62.90 2 24 4 M1+E2 0.065 5 11.78 17
167TM2 G %IG=5.0 9
167TM cG $E|g=62.88 {I5}, I|g=21.7 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=40:4.6:1.9:11:2.4:0.2:2.9 (1971Fu10)
167TM CG $L1:L2:L3=26 {I3}:3.6 {I4}:1 (1965Gr20)
167TMS G KC=9.77 14$LC=1.566 24$MC=0.350 6
167TMS G NC=0.0819 13$OC=0.01166 18$PC=0.000610 9
167TM cG MR$deduced from L-subshell ratio in 1965Gr20.
167TM2cG Other: 0.15 from sub-shell ratios in 1971Fu10
167TM G 169.04 3 0.77 7 E2 0.460 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.160 16
167TM cG $E|g=169.7 {I5}, I|g=1.03 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.25 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G EKC=0.32 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G KC=0.265 4$LC=0.1495 21$MC=0.0361 5
167TMS G NC=0.00824 12$OC=0.000991 14$PC=1.192E-5 17
167TM L 187.622 23 5/2- B
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=-0.1 {I4}.
167TM G 177.22 3 13.3 5 E1 0.0736 10
167TM2 G %IG=2.77 15
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.45 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G EKC=0.034 (1971Fu10)
167TM cG $Ice(K)/Ice(L1)=0.45 {I6}/0.06 {I2} (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.0616 9$LC=0.00934 13$MC=0.002074 29
167TMS G NC=0.000479 7$OC=6.55E-5 9$PC=2.97E-6 4
167TM L 282.20 4 (3/2)
167TM cL $3/2-, |p1/2[541] assigned in 1971Fu10; however, in
167TM2cL {+165}Ho(|a,2n|g) and {+167}Er(p,n|g) this configuration is
167TM3cL assigned for the 291 level
167TM E 0.0030 200.60 406.84 29 0.60 40
167TMS E EAV=305.4 18$CK=0.82378 28$CL=0.12985 11$CM+=0.04139 10
167TM G 94.53 5 0.6 5 [D,E2] 2.1 17 1.8 15z
167TM2 G %IG=0.12 10
167TM cG RI,TI$from Ice(K)=1.0 {I2} (1993AbZZ), assuming mult=D,E2
167TM G 110.49 5 0.36 31 [D,E2] 1.3 10 0.8 7 z
167TM2 G %IG=0.08 7
167TM cG $Ice(K)/Ice(L1)=0.4 {I1}:0.05 {I2} (1993AbZZ)
167TM cG M$not M2 from K/L1
167TM cG RI,TI$from Ice(K)=0.4 {I1} (1993AbZZ), assuming mult=D,E2
167TM G 272.1 2 0.013 4 [D,E2] 0.11 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0027 8
167TM G 282.4 2 0.041 8 [D,E2] 0.09 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0085 17
167TM L 285.864 25 9/2- B
167TM G 98.24 3 0.40 4 E2 3.28 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.083 9
167TM cG $K:L2:L3:M3=LT 2:0.4:0.4:LT 0.1 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G KC=1.090 15$LC=1.679 24$MC=0.411 6
167TMS G NC=0.0934 13$OC=0.01084 15$PC=4.58E-5 6
167TM G 143.46 2 10.3 3 E1 0.1284 18
167TM2 G %IG=2.14 10
167TM cG $E|g=143.41 {I5}, I|g=13.9 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.78 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G EKC=0.08 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G KC=0.1072 15$LC=0.01657 23$MC=0.00368 5
167TMS G NC=0.000849 12$OC=0.0001149 16$PC=5.03E-6 7
167TM L 290.87 7 (3/2-) B
167TM cL $See comment with 282.2 level.
167TM E 7.1E-4 14 0.15 3 7.44 9 0.15 3
167TMS E EAV=301.6 18$CK=0.82394 28$CL=0.12992 11$CM+=0.04142 10
167TM G 103.32 5 0.087 36 [M1,E2] 2.77 7 S
167TMS G KC=1.7 7$LC=0.8 5$MC=0.20 12
167TMS G NC=0.046 28$OC=0.0056 30$PC=9.E-5 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.018 8
167TM cG E$from the Adopted Gammas, |g masked by neighboring intense
167TM2cG lines in {+167}Yb |e decay in 1971Fu10
167TM cG RI$from I|g(280.5|g) and adopted I(103.32|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.9 {I10}
167TM2cG taken from (|a,2n|g)
167TM G 174.26 7 0.061 24 (E1) 0.0769 11 S
167TMS G KC=0.0644 9$LC=0.00977 14$MC=0.002171 30
167TMS G NC=0.000501 7$OC=6.85E-5 10$PC=3.10E-6 4
167TM2 G %IG=0.013 5
167TM cG E$from the Adopted Gammas, |g masked by neighboring intense |g rays
167TM2cG in 1971Fu10
167TM cG RI$from I|g(280.5|g) and adopted I(174.25|g)/I(280.5|g)=2.04 {I63},
167TM2cG taken from average value of (|a,2n|g) and (p,n|g)
167TM G 280.5 2 0.030 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0062 15
167TM cG $Placement based on the Adopted dataset, unplaced in 1971Fu10
167TM G 290.86 7 0.283 32 (E1) 0.0207429
167TMS G KC=0.01747 24$LC=0.00255 4$MC=0.000566 8
167TMS G NC=0.0001312 18$OC=1.829E-5 26$PC=8.91E-7 12
167TM2 G %IG=0.059 7
167TM cG $Placement based on the Adopted dataset, unplaced in 1971Fu10
167TM L 292.798 21 7/2- 0.9 US 1 DM2
167TM cL T$from (K-x ray)|g(t) (1965Ta01)
167TM E 1661 4 0.453 26 96.5 50 4.628 23 97 5
167TMS E EAV=300.8 18$CK=0.82397 28$CL=0.12993 11$CM+=0.04142 10
167TM cE E$from E|b+=639 {I4} (1978Cr06, magnetic spectrometer). Other:
167TM2cE 640 {I20} (1965Gr20)
167TM cE $%|b{++}(exp)=0.5 {I1} (1978Cr06, magnetic spectrometer). Other:
167TM2cE 0.4% {I1} (1965Gr20).
167TM G 6.93 13.3 4 S
167TM cG E$this transition is expected from the observed values of I|g(143.5|g)
167TM2cG in prompt and delayed (x ray)|g-coin data
167TM cG E$from energy difference between 293 and 286 levels.
167TM cG TI$from intensity balance at 286 level.
167TM G 105.19 2 2.9 3 M1 2.68 4
167TM2 G EKC=2.8
167TM cG $K:L1:M1=8.2:0.8:0.1 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G KC=2.246 31$LC=0.340 5$MC=0.0758 11
167TMS G NC=0.01774 25$OC=0.00255 4$PC=0.0001379 19
167TM2 G %IG=0.60 7
167TM G 113.32 2 270 10 E1 0.2397 34
167TM2 G %IG=56.2 30
167TM cG $E|g=113.30 {I5}, I|g=450 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=69:8.7:1.2:1.3:1.6:0.19:0.21:0.5 (1971Fu10)
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.244 {I12}:0.270 {I15} (1987BaZB)
167TM2 G EKC=0.25 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G K/L=5.5 15 $
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=7.4 {I20}:1:1 (1965Gr20)
167TMS G KC=0.1992 28$LC=0.0317 4$MC=0.00705 10
167TMS G NC=0.001621 23$OC=0.0002165 30$PC=9.04E-6 13
167TM G 150.40 3 0.18 5 E1 0.1133 16
167TM2 G %IG=0.037 11
167TM cG $E|g=150.5 {I3}, I|g=0.192 (1971GoYX, tentative |g)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.02 (1971Fu10), |?0.02 (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC=0.11 (1971Fu10)
167TMS G KC=0.0947 13$LC=0.01456 20$MC=0.00324 5
167TMS G NC=0.000747 10$OC=0.0001013 14$PC=4.47E-6 6
167TM G 176.23 3 100 E1 0.0747 10
167TM2 G %IG=20.8 8
167TM cG $E|g=176.31 {I10}, I|g=100 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=3.6 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G EKC=0.036 (1971Fu10)
167TM2 G K/L=7.3 15 $
167TM cG $L1:L2:L3=4.0 {I10}:1.3:1 (1965Gr20)
167TMS G KC=0.0625 9$LC=0.00948 13$MC=0.002106 30
167TMS G NC=0.000486 7$OC=6.65E-5 9$PC=3.02E-6 4
167TM L 296.14 3 9/2+ C
167TM E 1U?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=0.00 {I5}.
167TM G 116.66 3 0.12 5 M1 1.995 28 0.37 16z
167TMS G KC=1.671 23$LC=0.2526 35$MC=0.0563 8
167TMS G NC=0.01318 18$OC=0.001894 27$PC=0.0001025 14
167TM2 G %IG=0.025 11
167TM cG E$other: E|g=116.6 {I1} (1971Fu10).
167TM cG $Ice(K)/Ice(L1)=0.5 {I1}/|?0.08 (1993AbZZ)
167TM cG RI$from |a and I(|g+ce), the latter from intensity balance at 296
167TM2cG level, assuming no |e+|b{++} branch to that level.
167TM G 179.55 5 0.22 9 [E2] 0.374 5 z
167TMS G KC=0.2229 31$LC=0.1159 16$MC=0.0279 4
167TMS G NC=0.00638 9$OC=0.000770 11$PC=1.018E-5 14
167TM2 G %IG=0.046 19
167TM cG RI$from I(ce(K))=0.05 {I2} (1993AbZZ), assuming E2 transition.
167TM L 326.57 13 9/2+ A
167TM E 1U?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=0.014 {I14}.
167TM G 184.1 2 0.07 4 (M1+E2) -0.12 +11-180.548 16
167TMS G KC=0.458 19$LC=0.0698 26$MC=0.0156 7
167TMS G NC=0.00365 15$OC=0.000522 14$PC=2.80E-5 13
167TM2 G %IG=0.015 8
167TM cG $E|g=184.0 {I5}, I|g=0.072 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM cG MR$from Adopted Gammas
167TM G 209.93 3 0.031 18 E2 0.2214 31 S
167TMS G KC=0.1424 20$LC=0.0607 9$MC=0.01455 20
167TMS G NC=0.00333 5$OC=0.000408 6$PC=6.75E-6 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.006 4
167TM cG E$from the Adopted Gammas.
167TM cG RI$from I|g(184.1|g) and |g-branching ratio in Adopted Gammas
167TM L 383.68 6 9/2- D
167TM G 90.83 6 0.09 4 M1 4.09 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.019 8
167TM cG $Ice(K)|?0.2 (1971Fu10). Ice(K)=1.0 {I2} (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC AP 2.0 (1971Fu10)$ EKC=11 5 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=3.42 5$LC=0.519 7$MC=0.1158 16
167TMS G NC=0.0271 4$OC=0.00389 6$PC=0.0002104 30
167TM L 470.93 4 3/2+ E
167TM E 5.4E-5 8 0.042 6 7.89 6 0.042 6
167TMS E EAV=222.2 18$CK=0.82569 27$CL=0.13116 11$CM+=0.04186 10
167TM G 354.57
167TMF G FL=116.564
167TM G 460.36 9 0.130 17 (M1) 0.0468 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.027 4
167TM cG $E|g=460.4 {I4}, I|g=0.151 (1971GoYX, unplaced).
167TM cG $Ice(K)|?0.005 (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC AP 0.04 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.0394 6$LC=0.00577 8$MC=0.001282 18
167TMS G NC=0.000300 4$OC=4.33E-5 6$PC=2.374E-6 33
167TM cG M$from the Adopted Gammas
167TM G 470.65 9 0.111 14 (M1) 0.0442 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0231 31
167TM cG $E|g=470.6 {I2}, I|g=0.095 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM cG $Ice(K)|?0.004 (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC AP 0.04 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.0372 5$LC=0.00545 8$MC=0.001210 17
167TMS G NC=0.000283 4$OC=4.08E-5 6$PC=2.241E-6 31
167TM cG M$from the Adopted Gammas
167TM L 496.6 3 11/2- D ?
167TM G 112.89 4 0.007 7 M1+E2 +0.16 1 2.186 31 S
167TML G FL=383.68
167TMS G KC=1.809 26$LC=0.293 5$MC=0.0658 10
167TMS G NC=0.01535 24$OC=0.002173 33$PC=0.0001106 16
167TM2 G %IG=0.0015 15
167TM cG E,M,MR$from the Adopted Gammas. This |g not resolved from 113.32|g in
167TM2cG {+167}Yb |e decay.
167TM cG RI$from |a and I(|g+ce)=0.017 {I17} from intensity balance at 497 level
167TM L 522.15 5 5/2+ E
167TM E ?
167TM cE $Transition intensity balance gives I(|e+|b{++})=-0.066 {I5}.
167TM G 379.9 3 0.021 7 M1 0.0773 11
167TMS G KC=0.0650 9$LC=0.00958 14$MC=0.002131 30
167TMS G NC=0.000499 7$OC=7.19E-5 10$PC=3.93E-6 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0044 15
167TM cG M$from the Adopted Gammas
167TM G 405.57 8 0.070 10 (M1) 0.0651 9
167TMS G KC=0.0548 8$LC=0.00806 11$MC=0.001791 25
167TMS G NC=0.000419 6$OC=6.04E-5 8$PC=3.31E-6 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0146 22
167TM cG $E|g=405.6 {I2}, I|g=0.083 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM cG M$from Adopted Gammas
167TM G 511 ?
167TM cG E$this |g, if present, is not resolved from the 511-keV annihilation
167TM2cG radiation
167TM L 557.84 5 5/2+ F
167TM E 5.04E-5 41 0.094 6 7.484 28 0.094 6
167TMS E EAV=183.4 18$CK=0.82567 28$CL=0.13172 12$CM+=0.04207 11
167TM G 35.69 3 0.4 GTz
167TM cG $Ice(L1)/Ice(M1)=0.3 {1}/|?0.1 (1993AbZZ)
167TM cG TI$from Ice(L1)+Ice(M1).
167TM G 415.4 2 0.020 5 (M1+E2) 0.045 17
167TMS G KC=0.037 15$LC=0.0063 13$MC=0.00141 27
167TMS G NC=0.00033 6$OC=4.6E-5 11$PC=2.1E-6 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 11
167TM G 441.2 1 0.055 11 (M1) 0.0523 7
167TMS G KC=0.0440 6$LC=0.00645 9$MC=0.001434 20
167TMS G NC=0.000336 5$OC=4.84E-5 7$PC=2.65E-6 4
167TM2 G %IG=0.0114 23
167TM cG $E|g=441.2 {I2}, I|g=0.056 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 547.5 1 0.061 10 M1 0.0300 4
167TM2 G %IG=0.0127 21
167TM cG $E|g=547.6 {I2}, I|g=0.102 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM cG $Ice(K)|?0.003 (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC AP 0.05 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.02524 35$LC=0.00367 5$MC=0.000816 11
167TMS G NC=0.0001909 27$OC=2.75E-5 4$PC=1.515E-6 21
167TM L 867.72 14 (5/2+,7/2,9/2-) ?
167TM E 1.6E-9 8 0.023 4 7.87 8 0.023 4
167TMS E EAV=36.4 21$CK=0.82295 30$CL=0.13408 13$CM+=0.04297 11
167TM G 571.3 2 0.032 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0067 15
167TM G 680.3 5 0.021 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0044 15
167TM cG $E|g=680.4 {I3}, I|g=0.025 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM G 688.5 2 0.057 16
167TM2 G %IG=0.0119 34
167TM cG $E|g=688.6 {I4}, I|g=0.058 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM L 1216.51 6 7/2+
167TM E 0.76 8 5.99 5
167TMS E CK=0.81588 38$CL=0.13920 19$CM+=0.04492 13
167TM G 832.9 3 0.051
167TM2 G %IG=0.0106
167TM cG E,RI$|g from 1971GoYX only
167TM G 920.32 8 0.570 86 M1 0.0081511
167TM2 G %IG=0.119 19
167TM cG $E|g=920.3 {I2}, I|g=0.744 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.004 {I1} (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC=0.0070 20 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.00689 10$LC=0.000985 14$MC=0.0002181 31
167TMS G NC=5.11E-5 7$OC=7.38E-6 10$PC=4.09E-7 6
167TM G 923.7 4 0.030 12
167TM2 G %IG=0.0062 25
167TM cG $E|g=923.5 {I3}, I|g=0.044 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1037.07 7 3.00 35 M1 0.00608 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.62 8
167TM cG $E|g=1037.0 {I1}, I|g=4.13 (1971GoYX)
167TM cG $Ice(K)=0.015 {I5} (1993AbZZ)
167TM2 G EKC=0.0050 18 (1993AbZZ)
167TMS G KC=0.00514 7$LC=0.000733 10$MC=0.0001622 23
167TMS G NC=3.80E-5 5$OC=5.49E-6 8$PC=3.05E-7 4
167TM L 1229.82 10 (7/2-)
167TM E 0.084 12 6.93 6
167TMS E CK=0.81546 39$CL=0.13950 19$CM+=0.04505 13
167TM G 672.1 2 0.039 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0081 21
167TM cG $E|g=672.1 {I3}, I|g=0.044 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM G 707.7 4 0.016 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.0033 19
167TM cG $E|g=707.7 {I4}, I|g=0.045 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 733.2 3 0.034 10 ?
167TM2 G %IG=0.0071 21
167TM cG $E|g=733.1 {I3}, I|g=0.042 (1971GoYX, tentative and unplaced)
167TM G 846.1 2 0.065 12
167TM2 G %IG=0.0135 26
167TM cG $E|g=846.2 {I2}, I|g=0.103 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 903.3 2 0.033 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.0069 19
167TM cG $E|g=903.3 {I2}, I|g=0.015 (1971GoYX). This |g unplaced in 1971Fu10
167TM G 933.8 3 0.026 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0054 21
167TM cG $E|g=933.5 {I3}, I|g=0.052 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 936.7 3 0.035 11
167TM2 G %IG=0.0073 23
167TM cG $E|g=936.5 {I3}, I|g=0.058 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1050.3 2 0.190 45
167TM2 G %IG=0.040 10
167TM cG $E|g=1050.3 {I2}, I|g=0.217 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1432.29 10 (5/2-,7/2) ?
167TM E 0.053 9 6.82 7 ?
167TMS E CK=0.8061 5$CL=0.14629 30$CM+=0.04766 18
167TM G 1048.5 3 0.060 30
167TM2 G %IG=0.013 6
167TM cG $E|g=1048.7 {I2}, I|g=0.121 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 1139.5 1 0.193 27
167TM2 G %IG=0.040 6
167TM cG $E|g=1139.6 {I2}, I|g=0.309 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM L 1527.41 7 (5/2-)
167TM E 0.185 21 6.08 5
167TMS E CK=0.7980 7$CL=0.15210 41$CM+=0.04991 22
167TM G 1234.63 7 0.77 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.16 2
167TM cG $E|g=1234.6 {I1}, I|g=1.14 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1340.1 4 0.020 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0042 15
167TM cG $E|g=1339.9 {I4}, I|g=0.014 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 1384.8 2 0.041 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.0085 19
167TM cG $E|g=1385.1 {I2}, I|g=0.055 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 1410.7 4 0.015 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0031 11
167TM cG $E|g=1410.4 {I3}, I|g=0.024 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1517.0 2 0.042 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0087 17
167TM cG $E|g=1517.3 {I3}, I|g=0.064 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1543.84 17
167TM cL $Level proposed in 1971GoYX only based on placement of 1217.1-,
167TM2cL 1401.9-, 1427.7-, and 1533.6-keV |g rays. Note that 1401.9|g is
167TM3cL placed from 1581 level in both 1971Fu10 and 1971GoYX. Other
167TM4cL three |g rays are reported in 1971Fu10 but as unplaced.
167TM cL $J|p=5/2,7/2 proposed in 1971GoYX
167TM E 0.0116 25 7.24 9
167TMS E CK=0.7961 8$CL=0.15343 44$CM+=0.05043 23
167TM G 1217.1 2 0.033 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0069 21
167TM cG $E|g=1217.1 {I2}, I|g=0.047 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1427.8 3 0.015 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0031 11
167TM cG $E|g=1427.7 {I2}, I|g=0.027 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1533.1 4 0.008 3
167TM2 G %IG=0.0017 6
167TM cG $E|g=1533.6 {I3}, I|g=0.0083 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1580.95 5 (5/2+,7/2+)
167TM E 0.128 10 6.11 4
167TMS E CK=0.7913 9$CL=0.1569 5$CM+=0.05179 25
167TM G 1022.9 2 0.053 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0110 21
167TM cG $E|g=1022.8 {I2}, I|g=0.062 (1971GoYX, placed from a 1319 level)
167TM G 1110.3 1 0.052 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0108 21
167TM cG $E|g=1110.4 {I2}, I|g=0.073 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 1254.5 4 0.013 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0027 11
167TM G 1288.1 1 0.168 24
167TM2 G %IG=0.035 5
167TM cG $E|g=1288.0 {I3}, I|g=0.281 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1298.2 6 0.011 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0023 11
167TM G 1393.1 2 0.030 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0062 13
167TM cG $E|g=1393.1 {I2}, I|g=0.043 (1971GoYX, unplaced)
167TM G 1401.9 3 0.014 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0029 11
167TM cG $E|g=1401.9 {I3}, I|g=0.023 (1971GoYX, also placed from a 1544 level)
167TM G 1438.3 1 0.107 16
167TM2 G %IG=0.0223 34
167TM cG $E|g=1438.4 {I1}, I|g=0.165 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1464.8 2 0.029 6
167TM2 G %IG=0.0060 13
167TM cG $E|g=1464.7 {I3}, I|g=0.038 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1570.4 2 0.140 21
167TM2 G %IG=0.029 5
167TM cG $E|g=1570.5 {I1}, I|g=0.222 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1597.54 7 (5/2-,7/2+)
167TM E 0.093 9 6.20 5
167TMS E CK=0.7887 10$CL=0.1588 6$CM+=0.05252 27
167TM G 1213.3 2 0.030 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0062 21
167TM cG $E|g=1213.2 {I2}, I|g=0.054 (1971GoYX, placed from a 1535 level)
167TM G 1304.9 1 0.160 24
167TM2 G %IG=0.033 5
167TM cG $E|g=1304.8 {I2}, I|g=0.245 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1455.1 1 0.110 16
167TM2 G %IG=0.0229 35
167TM cG $E|g=1455.1 {I1}, I|g=0.170 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1481.1 3 0.012 5
167TM2 G %IG=0.0025 11
167TM cG $E|g=1481.0 {I3}, I|g=0.017 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1587.1 2 0.136 18
167TM2 G %IG=0.028 4
167TM cG $E|g=1587.2 {I2}, I|g=0.205 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1629.17 10 (5/2+,7/2+)
167TM E 0.029 4 6.61 6
167TMS E CK=0.7829 11$CL=0.1630 7$CM+=0.05415 31
167TM G 1332.5 2 0.027 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0056 15
167TM cG $Placement from 1971GoYX, unplaced in 1971Fu10
167TM cG $E|g=1332.8 {I2}, I|g=0.039 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1337.2 5 0.014 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0029 15
167TM cG $E|g=1336.7 {I5}, I|g=0.0087 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1487.4 2 0.043 10
167TM2 G %IG=0.0089 21
167TM cG $E|g=1487.6 {I2}, I|g=0.052 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1511.9 2 * ?
167TM cG $No intensity is attributed to the tentative second placement of
167TM2cG this |g
167TML G FL=116.564
167TM G 1619.2 2 0.056 8
167TM2 G %IG=0.0117 17
167TM cG $E|g=1619.2 {I2}, I|g=0.088 (1971GoYX)
167TM L 1654.29 8 (5/2+,7/2+)
167TM cL $Level also in 1971GoYX
167TM E 0.051 6 6.28 5
167TMS E CK=0.7771 13$CL=0.1671 8$CM+=0.05576 35
167TM G 1358.3 4 0.0054
167TM2 G %IG=1.12E-3
167TM cG E,RI$|g from 1971GoYX only
167TM G 1361.5 1 0.090 17
167TM2 G %IG=0.019 4
167TM cG $E|g=1361.6 {I2}, I|g=0.122 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1511.9 2 0.064 10 *
167TM2 G %IG=0.0133 22
167TM cG $E|g=1511.9 {I3}, I|g=0.101 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1537.5 4 0.015 7
167TM2 G %IG=0.0031 15
167TM cG $E|g=1537.6 {I3}, I|g=0.018 (1971GoYX)
167TM G 1643.8 2 0.072 9
167TM2 G %IG=0.015 2
167TM cG $E|g=1643.9 {I2}, I|g=0.109 (1971GoYX)