167YB 167LU EC DECAY (51.46 M) 1976ME06,1976GR06,1981KR0823NDS 202309
167YB H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 191, 1 (2023)$
167YB2 H CUT=22-Aug-2023$
167YB c 1976Me06: {+167}Lu from {+169}Tm({+3}He,5n),E({+3}He)=45 MeV,
167YB2c and {+170}Yb(p,4n),E(p)=45 MeV, Yb oxide targets
167YB3c enriched to 67% in {+170}Yb. Measured E|g, I|g, prompt and delayed
167YB4c |g|g-coin using Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) Compton-suppression spectrometer, and
167YB5c Ge(Li) surface barrier detector. Authors state that below 300 keV,
167YB6c E|g values were taken from 1971Ab04 as these values were more precise
167YB7c in this earlier work. Note that 1971Ab04 and later papers 1976Gr06
167YB8c and 1975VyZY are from the same experimental group
167YB c 1976Gr06, 1975VyZY (also 1987BaZB, 1977Gr21, 1965Gr20): {+167}Lu from
167YB2c spallation of tantalum by 660-MeV protons, followed by chemical and
167YB3c electromagnetic isotope separations. Measured E|g, I|g, E(ce), I(ceK),
167YB4c Ice(L1), Ice(L2), Ice(L3), prompt and delayed |g|g-coin with 20-30 ns
167YB5c resolving time using Ge(Li) and Si(Li) detectors, and a magnetic
167YB6c spectrograph with a resolution of 0.05%. Detailed tabular data for
167YB7c E|g, I|g, Ice(K), Ice(L1), Ice(L2), Ice(L3), multipolarity assignments,
167YB8c and mixing ratios are given in 1975VyZY. See also 1975VaYV from the
167YB9c same group for lifetime measurements of excited states. In earlier
167YBAc work in 1971Ab04, E|g, I|g, E(ce), I(ce) for 80 |g rays were measured
167YBBc using Ge(Li), Si(Li) and a magnetic spectrographs with a uniform-field
167YBCc and 0.05% resolution. These transitions were placed amongst 22 levels.
167YB c 1981Kr08: {+167}Lu from spallation of tantalum by 660-MeV protons,
167YB2c followed by chemical and mass separations. Measured |g(|q) from
167YB3c oriented nuclei at low temperature using a Ge(Li) detector
167YB c Others:
167YB c 1969Ar23: measured E|g, I|g.
167YB c 1960Ba32: measured positron spectrum, deduced two branches with
167YB2c end-point energies of 1530 {I200} and 1100 {I100} with equal
167YB3c relative intensities of one unit each. A third branch of 600 {I50} keV
167YB4c with relative intensity of 5 units was assigned to the decay of
167YB5c {+167}Yb
167YB c 1960Ba32: measured conversion electron spectrum
167YB c 1960Bu27: {+167}Lu activity produced and half-life measured
167YB c 1959Ha09: measured conversion electron spectrum
167YB c 1959Ka08: {+167}Lu activity produced
167YB c Theory for the decay of {+167}Lu: 1979Mi17
167YB c The decay scheme is from 1976Me06 and 1976Gr06 (with detailed data
167YB2c provided in 1975VyZY), which is considered incomplete by evaluators,
167YB3c as about 15% of the transition intensity remains unplaced,
167YB4c and multipolarities and mixing ratios of some of the low-energy
167YB5c transitions are not well established thus their transition
167YB5c intensities are only crude estimates. Additionally, several
167YB6c |g rays are multiply placed without intensity division. Angular
167YB7c distributions for a large number of |g transitions were measured by
167YB8c 1981Kr08 using low-temperature nuclear orientation method, but it
167YB9c still seems difficult to assign definite spin-parity assignments for
167YBAc many levels and well-defined mixing ratios for many transitions, as
167YBBc in general these cover a large range of values.
167YB cE $|e+|b{++} feedings are from intensity imbalance at each
167YB2cE level, with the given normalization factor from 1976Me06.
167YB3cE Note that results are in severe disagreement with the measured positron
167YB4cE and intensity of the annihilation radiation, the latter in 1976Me06.
167YB cE $1976Me06 quote measured |b end-point of 2060 keV, with 0.05% {I2}, and
167YB2cE a second branch with an end-point energy of 1400 keV {I100}, with an
167YB3cE an intensity of 0.07% {I2} from V.A Ageev et al. Report,
167YB4cE 14th Ann. Conf. on nuclear spectroscopy, Tbilisi, 1964. Total value of
167YB5cE I(|b{++})=0.12% {I3} is 15 times lower than the measured intensity of
167YB6cE annihilation radiation=38 {I4}, equivalent to 3.64% {I20} or
167YB7cE I(|b{++})=1.82% {I10} (1976Me06), with the conclusion by 1976Me06 that
167YB8cE discrepancy between the measured intensities of the positrons and that
167YB9cE of the annihilation radiation remains. Evaluators find even more
167YBAcE discrepant results from the total I(|b{++}) in the present level scheme
167YBBcE based on |e/|b{++} ratios from the log| {Ift} code.
167YB cE TI$From transition intensity balances, unless otherwise noted. All
167YB2cE feedings should be treated as approximate as there are many unsettled
167YB3cE issues about the decay scheme
167YB cE LOGFT$All values should be treated as approximate due to incomplete
167YB2cE decay scheme
167YB cG $All the A{-2} values are from |g(|q,temp), nuclear orientation data
167YB2cG in 1981Kr08. All the |a(K)exp values are deduced by evaluators from
167YB3cG Ice(K) data in 1975VyZY and I|g in this dataset, both the intensities
167YB4cG are normalized to the same scale
167YB cG $For detailed |g|g-coin data, see Table 2 in 1976Me06 and also Table 2
167YB2cG in 1975VyZY
167YB cG E$Weighted average of values from 1975VyZY and 1976Me06 for E|g>300
167YB2cG keV. For E|g<300 keV, values are from 1975VyZY as 1976Me06 stated
167YB3cG that they took more precise values from 1971Ab04 (earlier results from
167YB4cG the same group as 1975VyZY and 1976Gr06), except when noted otherwise.
167YB5cG Some of the E|g values are slightly different in 1975VyZY and 1971Ab04,
167YB6cG evaluators assume that data in 1976Gr06 and 1975VyZY supersede those
167YB7cG in their earlier paper 1971Ab04.
167YB cG RI$From 1975VyZY, except as noted. Data from 1976Me06 are
167YB2cG less comprehensive, but are of comparable precision and, in
167YB3cG general, are in agreement with those from 1975VyZY. However,
167YB4cG data for a few lines in the energy ranges 550-900 keV and 1470-1900
167YB5cG keV are significantly lower in 1976Me06 (by as much as a factor of
167YB6cG two). In order to compare data from 1975VyZY and 1976Me06, evaluators
167YB6cG scaled data from 1976Me06 by a factor of 2.2 {I1} for E|g<300
167YB7cG and 2.8 {I1} for E|g>300; these factors are the unweighted averages of
167YB8cG the nine most precise intensity ratios I|g(1975VyZY)/I|g(1976Me06) in
167YB9cG each energy range, while the different scaling factors in these energy
167YBAcG ranges are not clear. These may be due to detector efficiency
167YBBcG calibration issues
167YB cG M$From |a(K)exp and/or ce subshell ratios (1975VyZY), except
167YB2cG where noted; the photon and ce intensity scales were normalized by
167YB3cG 1975VyZY assuming |a(K)(M1 theory) for the 401.2|g, and this
167YB4cG normalization implies an |a(K)exp(213|g) which is consistent with M1
167YB5cG theory (as expected on the basis of subshell ratios for the 213-keV
167YBxcG transition).
167YB cG MR$Unless indicated otherwise, |d data given with a sign are
167YB2cG from |g-ray anisotropy (nuclear orientation measurements of 1981Kr08)
167YB3cG and those without a sign are from conversion electron data in 1975VyZY
167YB4cG (authors' analysis of subshell ratios). Exceptions are noted. 1976Gr06
167YB5cG and 1971Ab04 are from the same group and it is assumed that ce data
167YB6cG from 1975VyZY supersede those in 1971Ab04
167YB cG MR(W)$From evaluators' analysis of ce data given under comments using
167YB2cG the BrIccMixing code
167YB cG TI(b)$Deduced from I(ce) data (1975VyZY) and adopted mult.
167YB cG M(g)$From |g(|q,temp), nuclear orientation measurements (1981Kr08).
167YB2cG For analysis of |g(|q) data, authors used decay scheme in 1976Me06
167YB cG E(d)$Gamma-ray energies listed in 1976Me06 and 1971Ab04 are the same.
167YB2cG According to the statement in 1976Me06, "Below 300 keV, most transition
167YB3cG energies derived by Abdurazakov et al [5] from their conversion
167YB4cG electron data are more precise than the present |g-ray results; in
167YB5cG those cases, their values were taken", 1976Me06 adopted E|g from
167YB6cG 1971Ab04 (ref. [5] in 1976Me06). Further, evaluators assume that E|g
167YB7cG data in 1971Ab04 are superseded in the later papers 1976Gr06 (and
167YB8cG 1975VyZY) from the same group, and adopt values from 1975VyZY
167YB cG E(x,X),RI(x)$|g reported only by 1975VyZY
167YB cG E(z),RI(z)$|g reported only by 1976Me06; I|g scaled as stated in
167YB2cG general comment for I|g
167YB cL E$From a least-squares fit of E|g data, including all the doubly-placed
167YB2cL |g rays. Reduced |h{+2}=1.54 is only slightly larger than critical
167YB3cL |h{+2}=1.25, with only five E|g values somewhat poorly fitted
167YB4cL out of a total of 230 |g rays
167YB cL J$From the Adopted Levels
167YB CL BAND(A)$|n5/2[523].
167YB CL BAND(B)$|n5/2[642].
167YB CL BAND(C)$|n1/2[521].
167YB CL BAND(D)$|n3/2[521].
167YB CL BAND(E)$|n11/2[505].
167LU P 0.0 7/2+ 51.46 M 15 3060 40
167LU cP J,T$From Adopted Levels of {+167}Lu
167LU cP QP$From 2021Wa16
167YB N 0.0434 38 0.0434 38 1.0 1.0
167YB cN NR$A value of 0.043 {I4} follows from I|g(239.2|g)=8.6% {I6}
167YB2cN (1976Me06), deduced by authors from measured ratio: I|g(239.22|g from
167YB3cN {+167}Lu decay)/I|g(176.2|g from {+167}Yb decay) for an equilibrium
167YB4cN decay of {+167}Lu |) {+167}Yb |) {+167}Tm. Summed transition intensity
167YB5cN equated to 100, with assumed no |e+|b{++} feeding to the ground state
167YB6cN of {+167}Yb gives |g-normalization factor of 0.0388 {I18}, in agreement
167YB7cN with the adopted value of 0.0434 {I38}, but it should be noted that
167YB8cN many |g rays remain unplaced in the decay scheme.
167YB PN 3
167YB G 26.23 1 M1+E2 0.078 +12-15 36.7 30 52 b
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YB cG $E|g=26.23 {I1}, I|g<8 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<1.2 (1976Me06)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=31:7.7:3.8 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M1=0.91:0.19:0.09:0.23 (1971Ab04)
167YB2 G ELC GT 5.3
167YBS G N/T=0.040 5$O/T=0.0054 6$P/T=0.000230 19
167YBS G LC=28.5 23$MC=6.5 6
167YBS G NC=1.51 13$OC=0.205 14$PC=0.00868 12
167YBS G L/T=0.75 4$M/T=0.173 18
167YB G 33.50 3 M1+E2 0.25 +12-1138 26 15 b
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G L/T=0.75 34$M/T=0.18 15
167YBS G N/T=0.04 4$O/T=0.005 4$P/T=1.0E-4 7
167YBS G LC=29 20$MC=7 5
167YBS G NC=1.6 11$OC=0.20 12$PC=0.00402 22
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=3.1:6.5:2.6 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 37.70 3 0.8 LE E2 238.8 35
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YB2 G %IG LE 0.035
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=<0.8:13:13 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G ELC GE 34
167YBS G LC=182.6 27$MC=44.9 7
167YBS G NC=10.19 15$OC=1.144 17$PC=0.000493 7
167YB G 57.78 2 M1+E2 0.32 +14-8 5.2 22 28 b
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G L/T=0.65 18$M/T=0.15 8
167YBS G N/T=0.035 19$O/T=0.0045 23$P/T=1.3E-4 5
167YBS G LC=4.0 17$MC=1.0 4
167YBS G NC=0.22 9$OC=0.028 10$PC=0.00078 6
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=9.3:8.2:3.9 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 60.98 2 (E2) 22.81 32 0.3 b
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G L/T=0.732 7$M/T=0.1806 32
167YBS G N/T=0.0411 8$O/T=0.00465 9$P/T=5.35E-6 10
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=|<0.02:0.12:0.12 (1975VyZY)
167YBS G LC=17.42 25$MC=4.30 6
167YBS G NC=0.979 14$OC=0.1107 16$PC=0.0001274 18
167YB G 100.70 3 2.8 9(M1) 3.31 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)=10 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $K:L1=10 {I3}:1.0 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=3.6 16
167YBS G KC=2.77 4$LC=0.423 6$MC=0.0948 13
167YBS G NC=0.02226 31$OC=0.00318 4$PC=0.0001692 24
167YB G 139.68 3 2.3 AP(M1) 1.302 18
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.9
167YBS G KC=1.089 15$LC=0.1658 23$MC=0.0371 5
167YBS G NC=0.00872 12$OC=0.001246 17$PC=6.64E-5 9
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.0999
167YB cG $E|g=139.68 {I3}, I|g|?2.3, Ice(K)=2.0 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<1 (1976Me06)
167YB G 158.15 2 0.8 AP(M1) 0.917 13 x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.035
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.5 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.6
167YBS G KC=0.767 11$LC=0.1166 16$MC=0.0261 4
167YBS G NC=0.00613 9$OC=0.000877 12$PC=4.67E-5 7
167YB G 169.25 25 4.4 11 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.19 5
167YB cG $I|g=2.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB G 194.60 4 2.2 7(M1) 0.514 7
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YB cG $E|g=194.60 {I4}, I|g|?4, Ice(K)=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC=0.40 18
167YBS G KC=0.430 6$LC=0.0651 9$MC=0.01458 20
167YBS G NC=0.00342 5$OC=0.000490 7$PC=2.61E-5 4
167YB G 202.9 5 3.0 15 E1,E2 0.16 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 7
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.5 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.16
167YB G 206.4 1 X
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.1 {I3} (1975VyZY) seems a misprint
167YB G 242.8 2 14 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.61 10
167YB G 263.5 2 7 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 9
167YB G 282.3 3 2.9 8 E2(+M1) 1.3 GT 0.107 18 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 4
167YB cG $E|g=282.3 {I3}, I|g=2.9 {I8}, Ice(K)=0.20 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.2 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.07 3
167YBS G KC=0.080 17$LC=0.0210 6$MC=0.00493 10
167YBS G NC=0.001140 26$OC=0.000147 7$PC=4.3E-6 12
167YB G 339.0 2 3.0 10
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB cG $E|g=339.0 {I2}, I|g=3 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.3 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.027 11
167YB G 344.8 4 3.4 8E1 0.01422 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.15 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.015 4
167YBS G KC=0.01198 17$LC=0.001749 25$MC=0.000389 6
167YBS G NC=9.07E-5 13$OC=1.261E-5 18$PC=6.14E-7 9
167YB G 350.5 2 4.8 4(E1) 0.0136819
167YBS G KC=0.01152 16$LC=0.001681 24$MC=0.000374 5
167YBS G NC=8.71E-5 12$OC=1.212E-5 17$PC=5.92E-7 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YB cG $E|g=350.5 {I2}, I|g=9.8 {I25} (for 350.5|g+352.3|g),
167YB2cG Ice(K)=0.06 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG RI,M$see comment for 352.03|g from 430 level
167YB G 360.7 2 X
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY).
167YB G 382.00 15 2.3 AP
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.10
167YB cG $E|g=382.00 {I15}, I|g=19.1 {I25} for 381.50|g+382.00|g,
167YB2cG Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY). 1976Me06 report only 381.35|g with
167YB3cG I|g=6.0 {I6}, scaled to 16.8 {I17}, implying I|g|?2.3 for 382.0|g
167YB G 415.4 3 3.7 8E1 0.0091913 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.16 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.014 3
167YBS G KC=0.00776 11$LC=0.001119 16$MC=0.0002487 35
167YBS G NC=5.80E-5 8$OC=8.11E-6 11$PC=4.03E-7 6
167YB G 417.76 11 15.0 15M1 0.0653 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.65 9
167YB cG $E|g=417.79 {I13}, I|g=15.0 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.62 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=417.74 {I11}, I|g=4.6 {I5}, scaled to 12.9 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.041 9
167YBS G KC=0.0549 8$LC=0.00815 11$MC=0.001819 26
167YBS G NC=0.000427 6$OC=6.12E-5 9$PC=3.30E-6 5
167YB G 420.0 2 5.3 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.07 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.013 4
167YB G 435.3 2 2.6 10M1 0.0587 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 5
167YB cG $E|g=435.3 {I1}, I|g=2.6 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=436.20 {I50}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.050 22
167YBS G KC=0.0493 7$LC=0.00731 10$MC=0.001632 23
167YBS G NC=0.000383 5$OC=5.49E-5 8$PC=2.96E-6 4
167YB G 439.9 5 2.0 8M1,E2 0.041 16 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.040 19
167YBS G KC=0.034 14$LC=0.0057 14$MC=0.00130 28
167YBS G NC=0.00030 7$OC=4.2E-5 11$PC=2.0E-6 9
167YB G 467.13 30 2.2 7 (E2) 0.0212530
167YB2 G EKC=0.023 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YB cG $E|g=466.9 {I5}, I|g=2.2 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=467.21 {I30}, I|g=1.0 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.025 10
167YBS G KC=0.01656 23$LC=0.00363 5$MC=0.000842 12
167YBS G NC=0.0001953 28$OC=2.57E-5 4$PC=9.02E-7 13
167YB G 474.08 20 3.0 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 4
167YB cG $E|g=474.3 {I5}, I|g=3.0 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=474.05 {I20}, I|g=1.3 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 485.16 20 4.2 8 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 4
167YB cG $I|g=1.5 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 487.57 20 7.2 15 E1,E2 0.013 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.31 7
167YB cG $E|g=487.6 {I2}, I|g=7.2 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.07 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=487.53 {I20}, I|g=2.0 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.010 3
167YB G 504.9 4 6.5 15 E1,E2 0.012 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.28 7
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.07 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.011 3
167YB G 507.2 2 12 2E2(+M1) 0.9 GT 0.023 6 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.52 10
167YB cG $E|g=507.2 {I2}, I|g=12 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.23 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.019 5
167YBS G KC=0.019 5$LC=0.0034 6$MC=0.00077 12
167YBS G NC=0.000181 29$OC=2.5E-5 5$PC=1.09E-6 34
167YB G 510.3 7 43 10(E2) 0.0169424 x
167YB2 G %IG=1.9 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.7 {I1} (1975VyZY). Evaluators note: this line may be
167YB2cG mixed with the annihilation radiation
167YB2 G EKC=0.016 4
167YBS G KC=0.01336 19$LC=0.00277 4$MC=0.000641 9
167YBS G NC=0.0001488 22$OC=1.979E-5 29$PC=7.34E-7 11
167YB G 515.3 2 7 2E1 0.00567 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 9
167YB cG $Ice(K)|?0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.003
167YBS G KC=0.00480 7$LC=0.000683 10$MC=0.0001516 21
167YBS G NC=3.54E-5 5$OC=4.98E-6 7$PC=2.528E-7 35
167YB G 528.17 30 2.8 6 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 3
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 534.60 20 6.9 14M1 0.0345 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 7
167YB cG $E|g=534.85 {I15}, I|g=6.9 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.20 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=534.44 {I12}, I|g=2.5 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.029 9
167YBS G KC=0.0290 4$LC=0.00427 6$MC=0.000952 13
167YBS G NC=0.0002236 31$OC=3.21E-5 5$PC=1.733E-6 24
167YB G 545.4 5 4.5 10E2 0.0143520 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.011 3
167YBS G KC=0.01140 16$LC=0.002280 32$MC=0.000525 7
167YBS G NC=0.0001221 17$OC=1.634E-5 23$PC=6.30E-7 9
167YB G 561.2 7 3.4 15 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.15 7
167YB G 567.0 7 4.1 20M1 0.0296 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 9
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.15 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.037 19
167YBS G KC=0.0249 4$LC=0.00366 5$MC=0.000817 12
167YBS G NC=0.0001919 28$OC=2.75E-5 4$PC=1.489E-6 21
167YB G 570.7 3
167YB cG $E|g=570.7 {I3}, I|g=16.9 {I30} for 570.0|g+570.7|g,
167YB2cG Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY). Possible values of I|g=3 {I7}, |<13 {I3}
167YB3cG or |>2 are discussed in comment for 570.0|g from 628 level. In
167YB4cG 1976Me06, only the 569.86 {I13} |g placed from 628 level is reported,
167YB5cG suggesting that only a small component may belong to 570.7|g
167YB G 574.3 3 9 2M1 0.0287 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.39 9
167YB cG $E|g=574.8 {I3}, I|g=9 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.17 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=574.10 {I17}, I|g=1.8 {I3}, scaled to 5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.019 6
167YBS G KC=0.02414 34$LC=0.00355 5$MC=0.000791 11
167YBS G NC=0.0001857 26$OC=2.66E-5 4$PC=1.441E-6 20
167YB G 580.0 5 3 1(E2) 0.0123517 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)|?0.04 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.013 4
167YBS G KC=0.00988 14$LC=0.001913 27$MC=0.000439 6
167YBS G NC=0.0001022 15$OC=1.375E-5 20$PC=5.48E-7 8
167YB G 583.0 5 3 1 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB G 588.18 30 2.8 10M1 0.0270 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 5
167YB cG $E|g=588.4 {I5}, I|g=2.8 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=588.10 {I30}, I|g=1.3 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.029 12
167YBS G KC=0.02272 32$LC=0.00333 5$MC=0.000743 10
167YBS G NC=0.0001746 25$OC=2.505E-5 35$PC=1.355E-6 19
167YB G 602.16 17 19.5 20M1 0.0254 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.85 12
167YB cG $E|g=602.5 {I2}, I|g=19.5 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.45 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=602.07 {I10}, I|g=7.0 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.023 5
167YBS G KC=0.02140 30$LC=0.00314 4$MC=0.000700 10
167YBS G NC=0.0001643 23$OC=2.357E-5 33$PC=1.276E-6 18
167YB G 604.7 3 8.8 18 E1,E2 0.008 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 9
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.15 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.017 3
167YB G 618.7 2 3.0 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.130 25
167YB G 626.4 5 3.1 10E1 0.00375 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.0065 21
167YBS G KC=0.00317 4$LC=0.000446 6$MC=9.89E-5 14
167YBS G NC=2.311E-5 33$OC=3.27E-6 5$PC=1.687E-7 24
167YB G 630.8 6 4.4 20M1,E2 0.016 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.19 9
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.07 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.016 8
167YBS G KC=0.014 5$LC=0.0022 6$MC=4.8E-4 14
167YBS G NC=1.13E-4 33$OC=1.6E-5 5$PC=7.9E-7 34
167YB G 633.32 20 15.6 30M1,E2 0.016 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.68 14
167YB cG $E|g=633.3 {I2}, I|g=15.6 {I30}, Ice(K)=0.18 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=633.34 {I20}, I|g=3.5 {I5}, scaled to 9.8 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.012 3
167YBS G KC=0.013 5$LC=0.0021 6$MC=4.8E-4 14
167YBS G NC=1.12E-4 32$OC=1.6E-5 5$PC=7.9E-7 34
167YB G 635.0 4 8.3 32 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.36 14
167YB G 646.18 21 2.5 8M1 0.0212630
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 4
167YB cG $E|g=646.6 {I4}, I|g=2.5 {I8}, Ice(K)=0.09 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=646.08 {I20}, I|g=1.6 {I2}, scaled to 4.5 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.036 14
167YBS G KC=0.01790 25$LC=0.00262 4$MC=0.000584 8
167YBS G NC=0.0001370 19$OC=1.967E-5 28$PC=1.066E-6 15
167YB G 652.1 5 4.8 6M1 0.0207729
167YB2 G EKC=0.025 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YBS G KC=0.01749 25$LC=0.00256 4$MC=0.000570 8
167YBS G NC=0.0001339 19$OC=1.921E-5 27$PC=1.041E-6 15
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values. It is possible that one of
167YB2cG the values is a misprint
167YB cG $E|g=652.6 {I2}, I|g=4.8 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.12 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=651.64 {I25}, I|g=1.2 {I2}, scaled to 3.4 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB G 660.5 2 10.5 10E1 0.00336 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 6
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.04 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0038 10
167YBS G KC=0.00285 4$LC=0.000399 6$MC=8.84E-5 12
167YBS G NC=2.066E-5 29$OC=2.92E-6 4$PC=1.516E-7 21
167YB G 663.75 20 4.8 5 E1,E2
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YB cG $E|g=663.8 {I2}, I|g=4.8 {I5}, Ice(K)=0.02 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=663.64 {I30}, I|g=1.4 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0042 21
167YB G 671.12 35 2.8 13E1 0.00325 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 6
167YB cG $E|g=671.4 {I6}, I|g=2.8 {I13}, Ice(K)<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=671.02 {I35}, I|g=1.3 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC<0.0036
167YBS G KC=0.00276 4$LC=0.000386 5$MC=8.55E-5 12
167YBS G NC=1.998E-5 28$OC=2.83E-6 4$PC=1.468E-7 21
167YB G 679.92 19 5.0 15(M1,E2) 0.014 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.22 7
167YB cG $E|g=680.0 {I3}, I|g=5.0 {I15}, Ice(K)|?0.04 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=679.86 {I25}, I|g=1.5 {I2}, scaled to 4.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.008
167YBS G KC=0.011 4$LC=0.0018 5$MC=4.0E-4 11
167YBS G NC=9.3E-5 27$OC=1.3E-5 4$PC=6.6E-7 28
167YB G 695.93 22 8.3 17
167YB2 G %IG=0.36 8
167YB cG $E|g=695.8 {I2}, I|g=8.3 {I17}, Ice(K)|<0.04 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=696.32 {I35}, I|g=1.3 {I2}, scaled to 3.6 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0048 $ EKC LE 0.0111
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 702.6 7 2.7 16 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 7
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.015 11
167YB G 715.89 12 16.0 12M1 0.0164223
167YB2 G %IG=0.70 8
167YB cG $E|g=715.9 {I2}, I|g=16.0 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.18 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=715.88 {I12}, I|g=4.6 {I7}, scaled to 12.9 {I20} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.011 3
167YBS G KC=0.01383 19$LC=0.002016 28$MC=0.000449 6
167YBS G NC=0.0001055 15$OC=1.514E-5 21$PC=8.22E-7 12
167YB G 726.4 4 2.5 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.03 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.012
167YB G 730.32 15 8.8 7M1 0.0156222
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 5
167YB cG $E|g=730.4 {I2}, I|g=8.8 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=730.27 {I15}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.015 3
167YBS G KC=0.01316 18$LC=0.001916 27$MC=0.000427 6
167YBS G NC=0.0001002 14$OC=1.440E-5 20$PC=7.82E-7 11
167YB G 734.57 14 8.4 6M1 0.0153922
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 4
167YB cG $E|g=734.6 {I2}, I|g=8.4 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.10 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=734.54 {I20}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0119 25
167YBS G KC=0.01297 18$LC=0.001888 26$MC=0.000421 6
167YBS G NC=9.88E-5 14$OC=1.419E-5 20$PC=7.70E-7 11
167YB G 740.1 2 10.0 6M1+E2 0.8 +7-5 0.0120 25 x
167YBF G FLAG=W
167YB2 G %IG=0.43 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.10 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0100 21
167YBS G KC=0.0100 22$LC=0.00152 26$MC=0.00034 6
167YBS G NC=8.0E-5 14$OC=1.13E-5 21$PC=5.9E-7 13
167YB cG M$M1 in 1975VyZY
167YB G 745.2 5 2.2 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.009
167YB G 753.0 7 3.1 5M1+E2 1.0 +17-6 0.0106 29 x
167YBF G FLAG=W
167YB2 G %IG=0.135 25
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.027 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0087 24
167YBS G KC=0.0089 25$LC=0.00136 31$MC=0.00031 7
167YBS G NC=7.2E-5 16$OC=1.01E-5 24$PC=5.2E-7 16
167YB G 763.6 4 20.0 14M1,E2 0.010 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.87 10
167YB cG $E|g=763.9 {I2}, I|g=20.0 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.16 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=763.18 {I32}, I|g=4.0 {I6}, scaled to 11.2 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0080 16 $ EKC=0.016 4
167YBS G KC=0.0086 32$LC=0.0013 4$MC=3.0E-4 9
167YBS G NC=6.9E-5 20$OC=9.8E-6 31$PC=5.0E-7 20
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 769.6 4 2.6 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 3
167YB G 779.74 14 5.4 5E2(+M1) 1.5 +32-6 0.0084 19 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 3
167YB cG $E|g=779.8 {I2}, I|g=5.4 {I5}, Ice(K)=0.038 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=779.68 {I20}, I|g=3.0 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0070 16
167YBS G KC=0.0070 16$LC=0.00111 20$MC=0.00025 4
167YBS G NC=5.8E-5 10$OC=8.2E-6 15$PC=4.0E-7 10
167YB G 792.5 4 2.0 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.087 23
167YB G 803.82 20 5.4 7M1 0.01229
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 4
167YB cG $E|g=803.8 {I2}, I|g=5.4 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.047 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=803.89 {I40}, I|g=1.5 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0087 22
167YBS G KC=0.01036 15$LC=0.001504 21$MC=0.000335 5
167YBS G NC=7.86E-5 11$OC=1.130E-5 16$PC=6.14E-7 9
167YB G 808.66 20 10.3 12M1+E2 1.3 +12-5 0.0081 15 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.45 7
167YB cG $E|g=808.7 {I2}, I|g=10.3 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.07 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=808.62 {I20}, I|g=3.1 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0068 13
167YBS G KC=0.0068 13$LC=0.00105 16$MC=0.00024 4
167YBS G NC=5.5E-5 8$OC=7.8E-6 13$PC=3.9E-7 8
167YB G 814.9 4 4.4 12
167YB2 G %IG=0.19 6
167YB cG $E|g=814.3 {I5}, I|g=4.4 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=815.15 {I30}, I|g=1.7 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 817.3 5 4.4 LT x
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.191
167YB G 826.5 2 2.4 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.104 20
167YB G 830.64 16 8.5 7M1 0.0113216
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 5
167YB cG $E|g=830.5 {I2}, I|g=8.5 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=830.73 {I16}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0094 25
167YBS G KC=0.00955 13$LC=0.001384 19$MC=0.000308 4
167YBS G NC=7.24E-5 10$OC=1.040E-5 15$PC=5.66E-7 8
167YB G 833.61 15 8.9 7M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.0101 11 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.39 5
167YB cG $E|g=833.5 {I2}, I|g=8.9 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.07 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=833.76 {I24}, I|g=2.0 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0079 13 $ EKC=0.014 3
167YBS G KC=0.0085 10$LC=0.00125 12$MC=0.000279 27
167YBS G NC=6.5E-5 6$OC=9.4E-6 10$PC=5.0E-7 6
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB cG $Proposed placement by 1976Me06 only from 1022 to 188 level is
167YB2cG inconsistent with (5/2,9/2)+ for 1022 level and 1/2- for 188 level,
167YB3cG and dominant mult=M1 for 83.6|g, thus evaluators reject this placement
167YB G 847.05 21 4.6 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 4
167YB cG $E|g=846.7 {I3}, I|g=4.6 {I9}, Ice(K)|<0.026 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=847.18 {I18}, I|g=1.5 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0057
167YB G 858.5 5 3.7 7M1 0.0104315
167YB2 G %IG=0.16 3
167YB cG $E|g=858.5 {I5}, I|g=3.7 {I7}, Ice(K)|?0.034 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=858.40 {I60}, I|g=1.0 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0092
167YBS G KC=0.00880 12$LC=0.001274 18$MC=0.000284 4
167YBS G NC=6.66E-5 9$OC=9.57E-6 13$PC=5.21E-7 7
167YB G 867.91 20 7.9 9M1 0.0101614
167YB2 G %IG=0.34 5
167YB cG $E|g=868.0 {I2}, I|g=7.9 {I9}, Ice(K)=0.064 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=867.78 {I24}, I|g=1.5 {I2}, scaled to 4.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0081 16 $ EKC=0.017 3
167YBS G KC=0.00856 12$LC=0.001240 17$MC=0.000276 4
167YBS G NC=6.48E-5 9$OC=9.31E-6 13$PC=5.07E-7 7
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 873.87 19 8.1 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.35 5
167YB cG $E|g=873.8 {I2}, I|g=8.1 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.023 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=873.94 {I19}, I|g=1.8 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0028 $ EKC LE 0.0051
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 883.50 20 8.6 7M1 0.0097214
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 5
167YB cG $E|g=883.5 {I2}, I|g=8.6 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.069 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=883.50 {I90}, I|g=2.0 {I5}, scaled to 5.6 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0080 13 $ EKC=0.014 4
167YBS G KC=0.00820 11$LC=0.001186 17$MC=0.000264 4
167YBS G NC=6.20E-5 9$OC=8.91E-6 12$PC=4.85E-7 7
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 887.6 2 7.7 7E2 0.00475 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)|?0.030 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0039
167YBS G KC=0.00392 5$LC=0.000640 9$MC=0.0001444 20
167YBS G NC=3.37E-5 5$OC=4.69E-6 7$PC=2.206E-7 31
167YB G 893.0 2 6.2 5M1(+E2) 1.5 LT 0.0078 17 x
167YBF G FLAG=W
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 3
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.042 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0068 17
167YBS G KC=0.0066 14$LC=0.00097 18$MC=0.00022 4
167YBS G NC=5.1E-5 9$OC=7.3E-6 14$PC=3.8E-7 9
167YB G 898.8 2 5.0 5M1 0.0093113 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.22 3
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.042 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0084 22
167YBS G KC=0.00786 11$LC=0.001136 16$MC=0.0002529 35
167YBS G NC=5.94E-5 8$OC=8.53E-6 12$PC=4.65E-7 7
167YB G 903.2 3 3.8 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.165 23
167YB G 908.66 30 4.8 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YB cG $E|g=908.8 {I3}, I|g=4.8 {I5}, Ice(K)<0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=908.42 {I40}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC<0.0042
167YB G 919.97 15 7.3 11 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 6
167YB cG $I|g=2.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 951.7 3 2.5 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 3
167YB G 961.4 2 6.3 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 4
167YB G 967.29 35 3.1 6 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 3
167YB cG $I|g=1.1 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 973.0 7 0.65 35 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.028 16
167YB G 980.0 4 1.1 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.048 18
167YB G 985.8 3 3.5 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.15 3
167YB G 999.6 5 1.8 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.078 23
167YB G 1009.7 3 5.2 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 3
167YB cG $Ice(K)|?0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0019
167YB G 1013.4 4 2.9 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.126 25
167YB G 1016.66 20 6.7 7E1 1.45E-3 2
167YB2 G %IG=0.29 4
167YB cG $E|g=1016.8 {I2}, I|g=6.7 {I7}, Ice(K)|?0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1016.51 {I20}, I|g=2.4 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0015
167YBS G KC=0.001236 17$LC=0.0001693 24$MC=3.74E-5 5
167YBS G NC=8.75E-6 12$OC=1.248E-6 17$PC=6.66E-8 9
167YB G 1023.1 3 3.3 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 3
167YB G 1034.0 3 3.7 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.161 23
167YB G 1040.9 3 4.9 8E1 1.39E-3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 4
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.0020
167YBS G KC=0.001183 17$LC=0.0001620 23$MC=3.58E-5 5
167YBS G NC=8.37E-6 12$OC=1.194E-6 17$PC=6.38E-8 9
167YB G 1043.4 6 2.3 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YB G 1049.7 4 1.0 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.043 22
167YB cG $E|g=1049.5 {I5}, I|g=1.0 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1049.80 {I40}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, scaled to 2.8 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1058.9 2 3.4 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.15 3
167YB G 1068.1 4 6.5 12M1 0.00609 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.28 6
167YB cG $E|g=1068.5 {I4}, I|g=6.5 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1067.70 {I40}, I|g=1.5 {I3}, scaled to 4.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0077 21
167YBS G KC=0.00515 7$LC=0.000740 10$MC=0.0001646 23
167YBS G NC=3.86E-5 5$OC=5.56E-6 8$PC=3.04E-7 4
167YB G 1070.3 7 6.1 12M1 0.00606 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 6
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=1071.0 {I4}, I|g=6.1 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1069.70 {I30}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0082 23
167YBS G KC=0.00512 7$LC=0.000736 10$MC=0.0001637 23
167YBS G NC=3.84E-5 5$OC=5.53E-6 8$PC=3.02E-7 4
167YB G 1076 2 3 AP x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.13
167YB G 1083.0 3 8.5 12(E2) 0.00316 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 6
167YB cG $Ice(K)|?0.03 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0035
167YBS G KC=0.00263 4$LC=0.000407 6$MC=9.13E-5 13
167YBS G NC=2.136E-5 30$OC=3.00E-6 4$PC=1.483E-7 21
167YB G 1085.27 17 15.9 16
167YB2 G %IG=0.69 9
167YB cG $E|g=1085.5 {I3}, I|g=15.9 {I16}, Ice(K)|?0.03 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1085.19 {I17}, I|g=5.2 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0019
167YB G 1108.96 20 6.4 23
167YB2 G %IG=0.28 10
167YB cG $E|g=1108.9 {I5}, I|g=6.4 {I23}, Ice(K)=0.020 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1108.97 {I20}, I|g=2.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0031 15
167YB G 1112.1 13 3.0 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB G 1120.4 6 1.8 AP x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.078
167YB G 1123.1 4 3.1 10 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 5
167YB G 1132.2 3 3.8 AP x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.17
167YB G 1137.0 4 4.3 AP x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.187
167YB cG $Ice(K)<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC<0.0023
167YB G 1146.0 15 1.8 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.08 4
167YB G 1153.3 10 1.2 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.05 3
167YB G 1161.41 13 15.8 15E1 1.15E-3 2
167YB2 G %IG=0.69 9
167YB cG $E|g=1161.4 {I2}, I|g=15.8 {I15}, Ice(K)|<0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1161.41 {I17}, I|g=5.2 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0013
167YBS G KC=0.000971 14$LC=0.0001322 19$MC=2.92E-5 4
167YBS G NC=6.84E-6 10$OC=9.76E-7 14$PC=5.25E-8 7$IPC=9.46E-6 14
167YB G 1167.9 5 3.7 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.16 6
167YB G 1173.5 9 6.7 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.29 6
167YB G 1196.59 20 7.3 7(E2) 0.00259 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 4
167YB cG $E|g=1196.6 {I2}, I|g=7.3 {I7}, Ice(K)=0.019 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1196.57 {I28}, I|g=3.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0026 9
167YBS G KC=0.002168 30$LC=0.000328 5$MC=7.34E-5 10
167YBS G NC=1.718E-5 24$OC=2.422E-6 34$PC=1.221E-7 17$IPC=4.61E-6 7
167YB G 1199.9 2 8.1 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.35 5
167YB G 1208.2 5 3.9 11M1,E2 0.0035 10 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.014 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0036 16
167YBS G KC=0.0030 8$LC=4.3E-4 11$MC=9.7E-5 25
167YBS G NC=2.3E-5 6$OC=3.2E-6 9$PC=1.7E-7 5$IPC=6.5E-6 8
167YB G 1212.8 4 5.5 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0018
167YB G 1217.3 9 3.2 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 5
167YB G 1234.0 2 10.5 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 7
167YB G 1259.3 3 5.7 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.25 4
167YB G 1280.3 3 10.9 10 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.47 6
167YB G 1284.4 3 8 1 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.35 5
167YB G 1289.4 7 3.8 16 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 7
167YB G 1296.0 5 2.0 9 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 4
167YB G 1301.06 20 8.0 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.35 5
167YB cG $E|g=1301.1 {I2}, I|g=8.0 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1300.90 {I40}, I|g=2.0 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0013
167YB G 1308.3 5 3.4 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.15 3
167YB G 1314.5 6 2.3 9 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 4
167YB G 1319.76 28 8.8 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 5
167YB cG $E|g=1319.9 {I3}, I|g=8.8 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1319.64 {I28}, I|g=2.1 {I3}, scaled to 5.9 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0011
167YB G 1327.6 4 4.5 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 3
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.19 {I3} (1975VyZY), could be a misprint as
167YB2cG |a(K)exp=0.042 {I9} is too large to be consistent with M1 in 1975VyZY
167YB G 1338.1 6 5.5 15 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 7
167YB G 1343.8 5 5.5 15 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 7
167YB G 1348.8 10 2.5 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 6
167YB G 1357 2 4 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 9
167YB G 1362 2 3.3 16 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 7
167YB G 1387.8 3 4.0 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 4
167YB G 1414.1 3 2.7 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.117 20
167YB cG $E|g=1414.1 {I3}, I|g=2.7 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1414.09 {I60}, I|g=0.9 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1420.6 4 2.9 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.126 21
167YB G 1439.0 13 2.3 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 5
167YB G 1451.7 8 2.8 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 5
167YB G 1500.4 5 6.3 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 6
167YB G 1515.8 5 5.3 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 4
167YB cG $E|g=1515.8 {I7}, I|g=8.5 {I27}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1515.79 {I47}, I|g=1.9 {I3}, scaled to 5.3 {I8} (1976Me06);
167YB2cG I|g adopted from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0028
167YB cG $|a(K)exp using I|g from 1976Me06
167YB G 1594.7 4 3.2 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 5
167YB G 1601.0 15 1.8 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.078 19
167YB G 1607.52 27 7.5 11
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 6
167YB cG $E|g=1607.7 {I4}, I|g=7.5 {I11} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1607.44 {I27}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1610.97 32 6.5 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.28 4
167YB cG $E|g=1611.2 {I4}, I|g=6.5 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1610.83 {I32}, I|g=2.8 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1621.0 5 6.2 26 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 12
167YB G 1624.7 6 7.3 26 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 12
167YB G 1653.9 5 4.2 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 3
167YB cG $E|g=1653.5 {I7}, I|g=4.0 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1654.13 {I50}, I|g=1.5 {I2}, scaled to 4.2 {I6} (1976Me06);
167YB2cG I|g adopted from 1976Me06
167YB G 1671.9 9 4.5 15 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 7
167YB G 1694.8 7 7.6 28 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 13
167YB G 1704.5 5 4.9 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YB G 1730.92 30 8.8 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 5
167YB cG $E|g=1731.1 {I3}, I|g=8.8 {I7} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1730.74 {I30}, I|g=2.0 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1747.50 30 10.5 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 5
167YB cG $E|g=1747.5 {I3}, I|g=10.5 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1747.49 {I35}, I|g=1.8 {I3}, scaled to 5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0010 $ EKC LE 0.0020
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second from I|g in 1976Me06
167YB G 1770.7 5 8.7 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 5
167YB cG $E|g=1770.2 {I3}, I|g=8.7 {I9} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1771.11 {I24}, I|g=2.3 {I3}, scaled to 6.4 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values.
167YB cG $|g placed in 1976Me06 from the 1951, 9/2 level to 180, (3/2-) or
167YB2cG the 179, 9/2- in 1981Kr08, but evaluators reject both placements based
167YB3cG on poor energy fits.
167YB G 1778.9 3 9.7 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.42 5
167YB cG $Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0010
167YB G 1785.4 12 2.2 18 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 8
167YB G 1788.3 15 2.3 18 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 8
167YB G 1808.8 3 3.5 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.152 22
167YB G 1838.4 10 3.1 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.135 25
167YB G 1843.9 10 3.7 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.16 3
167YB G 1855 2 1.5 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.07 3
167YB G 1863 2 1.0 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.04 3
167YB G 1868.30 20 15.5 11
167YB2 G %IG=0.67 8
167YB cG $E|g=1868.2 {I3}, I|g=15.5 {I11} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1868.34 {I20}, I|g=5.4 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1879.28 20 9.5 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.41 5
167YB cG $E|g=1879.3 {I2}, I|g=9.5 {I7} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1879.12 {I56}, I|g=1.5 {I5}, scaled to 4.2 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1884.7 3 7.3 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 4
167YB G 1989.41 15 23.0 12
167YB2 G %IG=1.00 10
167YB cG $E|g=1989.3 {I2}, I|g=23.0 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1989.47 {I15}, I|g=8.5 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2000.6 33 6.7 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.29 4
167YB cG $E|g=2000.4 {I5}, I|g=6.7 {I7} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2000.73 {I33}, I|g=2.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2003.2 15 1.1 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.05 3
167YB G 2026.0 5 1.8 3
167YB2 G %IG=0.078 15
167YB cG $E|g=2026.0 {I5}, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2025.9 {I14}, I|g=0.6 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2031.9 3 3.1 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.135 18
167YB G 2042.2 11 0.7 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.030 18
167YB G 2047.8 3 3.9 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.169 23
167YB cG $E|g=2047.8 {I3}, I|g=3.9 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2047.77 {I60}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2062.6 7 2.0 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 4
167YB cG $E|g=2063.4 {I2}, I|g=5.0 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2062.6 {I7}, I|g=0.7 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB cG E,RI$from 1976Me06, as in 1975VyZY 2063.4 seems composite of
167YB2cG 2062.6|g and 2064.6|g in 1976Me06
167YB G 2064.6 7 2.0 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 4
167YB cG E,RI$from 1976Me06. See comment for 2062.6|g for data in 1975VyZY
167YB G 2075.0 10 0.8 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.035 18
167YB G 2080.5 4 2.5 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 4
167YB G 2085 1 0.8 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.035 22
167YB G 2091.3 20 0.8 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.035 22
167YB G 2095.4 20 0.8 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.035 22
167YB G 2103.3 7 0.4 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.017 9
167YB G 2107.4 16 1.2 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.05 4
167YB G 2110.3 25 0.8 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.04 3
167YB G 2121.5 5 0.6 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.026 9
167YB G 2126.9 4 0.55 20 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.024 9
167YB G 2132 2 0.2 1 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.009 5
167YB G 2139.5 5 0.5 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.022 9
167YB G 2145.9 6 0.9 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.039 22
167YB G 2148.5 4 3.8 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 3
167YB cG $E|g=2148.3 {I4}, I|g=3.8 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2148.77 {I40}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2170.1 5 0.8 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.035 9
167YB G 2173.7 6 0.7 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.030 9
167YB G 2177.6 12 0.25 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.011 5
167YB G 2190.2 3 2.4 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.104 16
167YB G 2198.40 20 11.6 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.50 6
167YB cG $E|g=2198.3 {I2}, I|g=11.6 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2198.59 {I27}, I|g=3.0 {I5}, scaled to 8.4 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2211.1 4 2.9 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.126 17
167YB G 2215.9 20 1.0 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.043 22
167YB G 2218.9 7 1.2 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.052 22
167YB G 2225.2 4 1.1 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.048 14
167YB G 2228.6 5 1.1 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.048 14
167YB G 2231.4 6 0.65 22 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.028 10
167YB G 2235.2 8 0.53 27 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.023 12
167YB G 2237.8 7 0.74 25 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.032 11
167YB G 2244 1 1.6 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.070 23
167YB G 2247.58 20 6.0 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.26 4
167YB cG $E|g=2247.6 {I2}, I|g=6.0 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2247.49 {I40}, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2253.7 5 1.0 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.043 14
167YB G 2257.9 3 2.6 3
167YB2 G %IG=0.113 17
167YB cG $E|g=2258.0 {I3}, I|g=2.6 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2257.17 {I70}, I|g=0.6 {I1} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2266.0 4 15.6 10
167YB2 G %IG=0.68 8
167YB cG $E|g=2266.0 {I8}, I|g=15.6 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2266.00 {I50}, I|g=4.3 {I4}, scaled to 12.0 {I12} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2269.8 7 5.6 8 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 4
167YB cG $I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2278.4 4 1.9 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.083 15
167YB G 2283.0 5 0.75 20 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.033 9
167YB G 2288.9 6 0.75 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.033 6
167YB G 2292.7 4 2.4 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.104 13
167YB G 2304.7 20 0.5 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.022 13
167YB G 2308.6 6 1.3 3
167YB2 G %IG=0.057 14
167YB cG $E|g=2308.9 {I6}, I|g=1.3 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2307.7 {I10}, I|g=0.5 {I1} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2335.0 6 0.6 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.026 9
167YB G 2339.3 6 0.27 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.012 6
167YB G 2367.5 6 0.5 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.022 13
167YB G 2401.5 10 0.5 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.022 13
167YB G 2458.1 5 0.45 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.020 5
167YB G 2467.1 4 0.92 13 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.040 7
167YB G 2545.8 4 1.3 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.057 10
167YB G 2559.0 4 0.94 12 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.041 6
167YB L 0.0 5/2- 17.5 M 2 A
167YB E ?
167YB L 29.656 8 5/2+ 14 NS LT B
167YB cL T$|g|g(t) (1976Me06); other values: |<20 ns (|g|g(t),
167YB2cL 1975VyZY), |?400 ns (|g|g(t), 1975Bu10).
167YB E 0.9 9 4.1 41 6.6 GT 5 5
167YBS E EAV=903 18$CK=0.679 9$CL=0.1054 15$CM+=0.03348 37
167YB G 29.66 1 420 36 E1 1.737 24 d
167YB2 G %IG=18.2 23
167YB cG $E|g=29.66 {I1}, I|g=420 {I36} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=170 {I20}, scaled to 374 {I44} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.71 {I5}:1.02 {I6} (1987BaZB)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=124:93:129 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G ELC=0.8
167YBS G LC=1.352 19$MC=0.308 4
167YBS G NC=0.0690 10$OC=0.00788 11$PC=0.0002134 30
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=5.25:3.52:4.40:1.55:0.97:1.37:0.91 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 33.916 8 7/2+ 16 NS LT B
167YB cL T$|g|g(t) (1976Me06).
167YB E 0.9 9 4.1 41 6.6 GT 5 5
167YBS E EAV=902 18$CK=0.679 9$CL=0.1056 15$CM+=0.03352 37
167YB G 4.251 6.9E2 12 S
167YB cG E$from energy difference between 29.7 and 33.9 levels.
167YB2cG Transition unobserved, but existence confirmed in |g|g-coin (1976Me06).
167YB cG TI$|>568 {I81} and |<813 {I102} based on I(|g+ce) balance at 34
167YB2cG and 30 levels, respectively.
167YB G 33.91 1 81 8 E1 1.200 17 d
167YB2 G %IG=3.5 5
167YB cG $E|g=33.91 {I1}, I|g=81 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=35 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G ELC=1.25
167YBS G LC=0.934 13$MC=0.2122 30
167YBS G NC=0.0477 7$OC=0.00557 8$PC=0.0001588 22
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.69 {I3}:1.01 {I5} (1987BaZB)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=36:26:39 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N=1.65:1.03:1.82:0.38:0.21:0.34:0.21 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 58.539 9 9/2+ B
167YB E 0.9 7 4.1 39 7.0 +7-3 5 4
167YBS E EAV=891 18$CK=0.684 9$CL=0.1063 14$CM+=0.03377 37
167YB G 24.63 1 M1+E2 0.150 10 77 6 385 b
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YBS G L/T=0.76 4$M/T=0.179 18
167YBS G N/T=0.041 4$O/T=0.0051 5$P/T=0.000134 10
167YBS G LC=59 4$MC=13.9 11
167YBS G NC=3.19 25$OC=0.399 28$PC=0.01035 15
167YB cG $E|g=24.63 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<1.6, scaled to <3.5 (1976Me06)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=111:90:103 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=1.00:0.70 {I3}:0.78 {I4} (1987BaZB)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N=2.3:1.5:1.5:0.57:0.57:0.52 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $I|g in 1976Me06 implies |a(L)exp>87
167YB cG MR$from L-subshell ratios (1987BaZB). Other: 0.157 {I+19-22}
167YB2cG (1975VyZY, L-subshell ratios).
167YB G 28.88 1 E2 893 13 85 b
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YBS G LC=684 10$MC=167.1 24
167YBS G NC=37.9 5$OC=4.25 6$PC=0.001646 23
167YBS G L/T=0.765 7$M/T=0.1870 34
167YBS G N/T=0.0424 8$O/T=0.00475 9$P/T=1.84E-6 4
167YB cG $E|g=28.88 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<20, scaled to <44 (1976Me06)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=0.5:34:34 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M2=< 0.12:1.15:1.37:0.46 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 78.679 10 7/2- 0.84 NS 4 A
167YB cL T$ce|g(t) (1975VaYV).
167YB E 0.70 41 3.4 24 7.11 25 4.1 24
167YBS E EAV=882 18$CK=0.688 9$CL=0.1069 14$CM+=0.03395 37
167YB G 20.19 3 E1 4.99 7 10 APb
167YBF G FLAG=X
167YBS G LC=3.88 6$MC=0.896 13
167YBS G NC=0.1976 29$OC=0.02086 30$PC=0.000485 7
167YBS G L/T=0.647 6$M/T=0.1495 26
167YBS G N/T=0.0330 6$O/T=0.00348 7$P/T=8.09E-5 15
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=3.9:|?2.6:<2.6 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 44.77 2 29 7E1 0.556 8 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.3 3
167YB cG $E|g=44.77 {I2}, I|g<80 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=13 {I3}, scaled to 29 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=7.7:3.1:4.6 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G ELC=0.47
167YBS G LC=0.433 6$MC=0.0978 14
167YBS G NC=0.02215 31$OC=0.00269 4$PC=8.47E-5 12
167YB G 49.02 2 E1 0.432 6 13 b
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YBS G LC=0.337 5$MC=0.0759 11
167YBS G NC=0.01724 24$OC=0.002119 30$PC=6.87E-5 10
167YBS G L/T=0.2351 26$M/T=0.0530 7
167YBS G N/T=0.01204 17$O/T=0.001480 22$P/T=4.80E-5 7
167YB cG $E|g=49.02 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=4.6:2.6:3.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 78.67 2 35 4E2(+M1) 4.6 GE 8.25 12 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.52 22
167YB cG $E|g=78.67 {I2}, I|g=52.5 {I25} for 78.33|g + 78.67|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=16 {I2}, scaled to 35 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=65 {I18}:8.8:129:129 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=1.9 6
167YBS G KC=1.64 9$LC=5.05 12$MC=1.247 30
167YBS G NC=0.284 7$OC=0.0324 8$PC=8.0E-5 6
167YB L 125.918 21 11/2+ B
167YB E ?
167YB cE $Apparent 4.5% {I9} |e feeding inconsistent with assigned |DJ|p
167YB G 67.37 2 11.9 14M1+E2 0.30 +8-10 10.95 28 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.52 8
167YB cG $E|g=67.37 {I2}, I|g=11.9 {I14} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=6 {I1} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G ELC=2.6
167YBS G KC=8.18 33$LC=2.1 4$MC=0.50 10
167YBS G NC=0.116 24$OC=0.0150 26$PC=0.000506 21
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=17:5.9:8.5 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=0.63:0.23:0.27:0.17:0.068:0.12 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 92.05 7 5.0 15[E2] 4.43 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.22 7
167YBS G KC=1.206 17$LC=2.46 4$MC=0.606 9
167YBS G NC=0.1383 20$OC=0.01583 23$PC=5.23E-5 7
167YB L 178.863 13 9/2- 0.23 NS LE A
167YB cL T$ce|g(t) (1975VaYV).
167YB E 0.34 11 2.0 7 7.32 13 2.3 7
167YBS E EAV=837 18$CK=0.706 9$CL=0.1099 13$CM+=0.03490 35
167YB G 100.22 2 8.4 12M1+E2 4.9 +21-9 3.19 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 6
167YB cG $E|g=100.22 {I2}, I|g=8.4 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=4.8 {I16} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=1.2 4
167YBS G KC=1.09 4$LC=1.607 33$MC=0.396 8
167YBS G NC=0.0903 19$OC=0.01040 21$PC=4.82E-5 27
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=10 {I3}:1.0:9.0:7.7 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M2:M3=0.05:0.32:0.30:0.08:0.08 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 120.31 3 24.7 14E1 0.2101 29 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.07 11
167YB cG $E|g=120.31 {I3}, I|g=24.7 {I14} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=6.0 {I10}, scaled to 13.2 {I22} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=3.1 {I7}:0.5:|<0.13:|<0.10 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.13 3$ EKC=0.23 7
167YBS G KC=0.1743 24$LC=0.0279 4$MC=0.00624 9
167YBS G NC=0.001439 20$OC=0.0001913 27$PC=7.89E-6 11
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 144.97 3 43 2 E1 0.1285 18 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.87 19
167YB cG $E|g=144.97 {I3}, I|g=43 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=24 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=3.6 {I8}:0.26:<0.13 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.084 19
167YBS G KC=0.1070 15$LC=0.01674 23$MC=0.00374 5
167YBS G NC=0.000865 12$OC=0.0001162 16$PC=4.98E-6 7
167YB G 178.87 4 64 7E2 0.391 5 d
167YB2 G %IG=2.8 4
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $E|g=178.87 {I4}, I|g=59.0 {I36} for 178.87|g+179.69|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=29 {I3}, scaled to 64 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.18 4
167YBS G KC=0.2263 32$LC=0.1265 18$MC=0.0307 4
167YBS G NC=0.00705 10$OC=0.000841 12$PC=1.031E-5 14
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=11.3 {I20}:1.0:1.65:1.78 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.43:|?0.05:0.08:0.06 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 179.750 21 (3/2-) D
167YB cL $Level proposed only by 1976Me06. 1976Gr06 placed 179.69|g from
167YB2cL the 258 level
167YB G 179.69 4 6.6 LT[M1,E2] 0.51 13 &
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.29
167YB cG $E|g=179.69 {I4}, I|g=59.0 {I36} for 178.87|g+179.69|g, Ice(K)=2.3 {I5}
167YB2cG (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<3, scaled to <6.6 (1976Me06, placed only from
167YB2cG 179.8 level)
167YB2 G EKC>0.27
167YBS G KC=0.38 16$LC=0.103 21$MC=0.024 6
167YBS G NC=0.0056 13$OC=0.00072 11$PC=2.1E-5 11
167YB cG $|a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g.
167YB L 185.94 6 13/2+ B
167YB G 60.1 2 [M1] 2.44 4 S
167YBS G LC=1.899 32$MC=0.425 7
167YBS G NC=0.0999 17$OC=0.01426 24$PC=0.000757 13
167YB cG E$from the Adopted Gammas. This |g reported in all the three
167YB2cG in-beam |g-ray reaction studies
167YB cG RI$from ({+17}O,4n|g),({+18}O,5n|g) (1982Ro08), expected I|g=8.7 {I12}
167YB2cG if M1, but no such transition has been reported in |e decay.
167YB G 127.40 7 10.0 11(E2) 1.296 18
167YBS G KC=0.570 8$LC=0.555 8$MC=0.1362 19
167YBS G NC=0.0311 4$OC=0.00362 5$PC=2.431E-5 34
167YB2 G %IG=0.43 6
167YB cG E$weighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=127.42 {I7}, I|g=10.0 {I11} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=4.0 {I15} (1976Me06, unplaced)
167YB cG M$from the Adopted Gammas.
167YB L 188.704 21 1/2- 23 NS AP C
167YB cL T$|g|g(t) (1975VyZY).
167YB cL $Apparent 1.6% {I3} |e branch to this level presumably results
167YB2cL from incompleteness of the decay scheme.
167YB G 188.66 5 48.0 24E2 0.327 5 d
167YB2 G %IG=2.09 21
167YB cG $E|g=188.66 {I5}, I|g=48.0 {I24} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=22 {I1} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.21 4
167YBS G KC=0.1947 27$LC=0.1012 14$MC=0.02453 34
167YBS G NC=0.00563 8$OC=0.000674 9$PC=8.98E-6 13
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=10 {I2}:0.72:1.23:1.6 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.4:|<0.04:0.07:0.06 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 213.167 16 (5/2)-
167YB E 0.27 13 1.6 9 7.39 21 1.9 9
167YBS E EAV=822 18$CK=0.712 8$CL=0.1109 13$CM+=0.03521 34
167YB G 183.61 5 4 APE1 0.0692 10 d
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.17
167YB cG $E|g=183.61 {I5}, I|g|?4, Ice(K)|?0.25 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g|?3, scaled to |?6.6 (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.063
167YBS G KC=0.0578 8$LC=0.00885 12$MC=0.001974 28
167YBS G NC=0.000458 6$OC=6.22E-5 9$PC=2.78E-6 4
167YB cG $K:L1=0.08:0.02 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 213.19 4 86 5M1 0.399 6 d
167YB2 G %IG=3.7 4
167YB cG $E|g=213.19 {I4}, I|g=86 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=39 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.36 7
167YBS G KC=0.334 5$LC=0.0505 7$MC=0.01130 16
167YBS G NC=0.00265 4$OC=0.000380 5$PC=2.030E-5 28
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=31 {I6}:4.13:0.41:|<0.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=1.23:0.16:|?0.02:<0.01 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG MR$|<0.18 in 1975VyZY
167YB L 239.163 13 (5/2)- D
167YB cL J$5/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.53 30 3.4 22 7.06 25 3.9 22
167YBS E EAV=811 18$CK=0.716 8$CL=0.1116 13$CM+=0.03545 34
167YB G 25.98 2 M1+E2 0.190 +32-2381 18 16 b
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G L/T=0.76 12$M/T=0.18 5
167YBS G N/T=0.041 13$O/T=0.0051 15$P/T=0.000107 24
167YBS G LC=62 14$MC=14.7 34
167YBS G NC=3.4 8$OC=0.41 9$PC=0.00875 14
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=6:5.4:|?3 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 59.40 2 (M1) 2.525 35 3.8 b
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YBS G L/T=0.558 5$M/T=0.1249 20
167YBS G N/T=0.0293 5$O/T=0.00419 7$P/T=0.000222 4
167YBS G LC=1.966 28$MC=0.440 6
167YB cG $Placement from 1976Me06
167YB cG $E|g=59.40 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2=2.0:|<0.4 (1975VyZY)
167YBS G NC=0.1034 15$OC=0.01475 21$PC=0.000783 11
167YB G 160.49 2 7.3 16(M1,E2) 0.72 16 &
167YBF G FLAG=d
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 8
167YB cG $E|g=160.49 {I2}, I|g=7.3 {I16}, Ice(K)=3.6 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.7 {I2}, scaled to 5.9 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.49 16
167YBS G KC=0.52 21$LC=0.16 4$MC=0.037 12
167YBS G NC=0.0086 27$OC=0.00108 24$PC=2.9E-5 16
167YB cG M$E2(+M1) for doubly placed |g.
167YB G 205.40 10 11.5 15[E1] 0.0517 7
167YBS G KC=0.0433 6$LC=0.00656 9$MC=0.001464 21
167YBS G NC=0.000340 5$OC=4.64E-5 7$PC=2.108E-6 30
167YB2 G %IG=0.50 8
167YB cG E$weighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=205.45 {I10}, I|g=11.5 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=3.5 {I7}, scaled to 7.7 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB G 209.58 10 20 3 [E1] 0.0491 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.87 15
167YBS G KC=0.0411 6$LC=0.00622 9$MC=0.001388 20
167YBS G NC=0.000322 5$OC=4.40E-5 6$PC=2.007E-6 28
167YB cG E$weighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=209.56 {I10}, I|g=20 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=8.4 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB G 239.22 4 198 11M1+E2 +2.9 +15-9 0.165 13 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=8.6 6
167YB cG $E|g=239.22 {I4}, I|g=237 {I10} for 239.0|g+239.22|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=90 {I5}, scaled to 198 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=57 {I10}:8.44:0.8:<0.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.29 5 $ A2=-0.19 14
167YBS G KC=0.115 14$LC=0.0384 6$MC=0.00916 16
167YBS G NC=0.002110 35$OC=0.000263 4$PC=5.9E-6 9
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=1.86:0.28:0.034:<0.01 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $M1 from ce data; M1+E2 with |d=+2.9 {I+15-9} from |g(|q), where
167YB2cG measurement affected by the presence of 239.0|g, but
167YB3cG I|g(239.2|g)/I|g(239.0|g)=9.0.
167YB L 258.525 18 3/2- C
167YB cL J$3/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB G 19.4 1 [M1,E2] 3.3E+3 32 30 APb
167YBF G FLAG=X
167YBS G L/T=0.8 5$M/T=0.19 23
167YBS G N/T=0.04 6$O/T=0.005 7$P/T=5.E-6 5
167YBS G LC=2.5E+3 25$MC=6E+2 6
167YB cG $L1:L2=|?14.0:|<5.0 (1975VyZY)
167YBS G NC=1.4E+2 14$OC=15 15$PC=0.017 4
167YB G 45.35 10 [M1] 5.58 9 15 APb
167YBF G FLAG=X
167YB2 G L1/L2=6.25 (1975VyZY)
167YBS G LC=4.34 7$MC=0.973 15
167YBS G NC=0.2284 35$OC=0.0326 5$PC=0.001729 27
167YBS G L/T=0.660 6$M/T=0.1479 27
167YBS G N/T=0.0347 7$O/T=0.00495 10$P/T=0.000263 5
167YB cG $L1/L2 consistent with M1, not with E1 or E2.
167YB G 69.83 2 0.8 LEM1+E2 1.9 +6-3 12.7 4 d
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.035
167YB cG $E|g=69.83 {I2}, I|g|<0.8 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<2, scaled to <4.4 (1976Me06)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=0.77:7.7:6.5 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G ELC GE 19
167YBS G KC=3.0 5$LC=7.4 6$MC=1.82 16
167YBS G NC=0.41 4$OC=0.047 4$PC=0.000181 31
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3:M2=<0.057:0.21:<0.12:0.057 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 179.69 4 6.6 LT[E2] 0.385 5 &
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.29
167YB cG E$placement from 258.6 level only in 1976Gr06. Somewhat poor fit
167YB2cG in this location with level-energy difference=179.85
167YBF G FL=78.679
167YBS G KC=0.2234 31$LC=0.1241 17$MC=0.0301 4
167YBS G NC=0.00691 10$OC=0.000825 12$PC=1.018E-5 14
167YB G 258.54 4 36 2M1(+E2) -1.2 14 0.17 7 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=1.56 17
167YB cG $E|g=258.54 {I4}, I|g=36 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=15.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.31 23
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=8.3 {I15}:1.1:0.13:0.15 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.23 4
167YBS G KC=0.13 6$LC=0.0290 7$MC=0.00675 14
167YBS G NC=0.001566 23$OC=0.000206 16$PC=7.E-6 4
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.32:0.043:|?0.005 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG MR$-2.6|<|d|<+0.2 (1981Kr08)
167YB L 278.210 19 5/2- C
167YB cL J$5/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.12 12 0.8 8 7.3 GT 0.9 9
167YBS E EAV=793 18$CK=0.723 8$CL=0.1127 13$CM+=0.03579 33
167YB G 19.68 2 [M1,E2] 3.0E+3 30 20 18d
167YBS G L/T=0.8 5$M/T=0.19 23
167YBS G N/T=0.04 6$O/T=0.005 7$P/T=5.E-6 5
167YBS G LC=2.3E+3 23$MC=6E+2 6
167YBS G NC=1.3E+2 13$OC=14 14$PC=0.016 4
167YB cG $E|g=19.68 {I2} (1975VyZY). Ice(M1)=0.23 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $I|g<4, scaled to <9 (1976Me06)
167YB cG TI$>2 from Ice(L1)|?1.5 (1975VyZY), |<37 from intensity balance at
167YB2cG 259 level.
167YB G 89.49 2 3 1E2 4.94 7 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB cG $E|g=89.49 {I2}, I|g=3 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=4.1 {I10}:|?0.26:3.1:2.6 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=1.4 6
167YBS G KC=1.271 18$LC=2.80 4$MC=0.692 10
167YBS G NC=0.1578 22$OC=0.01805 25$PC=5.57E-5 8
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M2:M3:N=0.25:|?0.02:0.17:0.17:|?0.03:|?0.03 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 248.64 7 23 3 E1(+M2) 0.10 LT 0.038 6
167YB2 G %IG=1.00 16
167YB cG $E|g=248.64 {I7}, I|g=23 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.6 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=8.0 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.70 31 $ EKC=0.026 9
167YBS G KC=0.031 5$LC=0.0049 10$MC=0.00111 22
167YBS G NC=0.00026 5$OC=3.6E-5 7$PC=1.7E-6 4
167YB cG MR$<0.10 from |a(K)exp; +0.45 {I+11-48} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 278.2 1 22 7(M1,E2) 0.14 5 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.0 3
167YB cG $E|g=278.2 {I1}, I|g=107 {I10} for 278.2|g+278.9|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=10 {I3}, scaled to 22 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06; deduced from |g|g-coin data for 278.22|g, 278.5|g
167YB2cG and 278.92|g (unresolved) triplet
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=6.6 {I13}:1.2:0.5:|?0.08 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.30 11
167YBS G KC=0.11 5$LC=0.0229 14$MC=0.00529 16
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.27:0.05:<0.009 (1971Ab04)
167YBS G NC=0.00123 5$OC=0.000165 18$PC=6.5E-6 33
167YB cG $|d(E2/M1)=1.1 {I+5-3} (1975VyZY) from subshell data; but
167YB2cG |a(K)exp exceeds |a(K) for M1, assuming that Ice(K for 278.2|g) in
167YB3cG 1975VyZY includes no contribution from the 278.5|g.
167YB L 301.48 3 11/2- A
167YB cL J$11/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.055 13 1.34 30 8.89 10 1.4 3 1U
167YBS E EAV=788 17$CK=0.7911 31$CL=0.1283 6$CM+=0.04102 19
167YB G 122.63 4 2.6 LT(M1,E2) 1.69 20 7.0 APb
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G KC=1.1 5$LC=0.45 21$MC=0.11 5
167YBS G NC=0.025 12$OC=0.0030 12$PC=6.1E-5 35
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.113
167YB cG TI$I|g<2.6, Ice(K)=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY), so |a(K)exp>0.26,
167YB2cG favoring M1,E2 multipolarity.
167YB G 222.79 4 27.1 15E2 0.1882 26 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.18 12
167YB cG $E|g=222.79 {I4}, I|g=27.1 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=13.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=2.8 {I5}:0.68:1.1:0.69 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.103 19$ A2=-0.72 27
167YBS G KC=0.1214 17$LC=0.0512 7$MC=0.01234 17
167YBS G NC=0.00283 4$OC=0.000345 5$PC=5.82E-6 8
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.13:0.02:0.03:0.02 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $|d(O/Q)=+0.30 {I+59-31} (1981Kr08).
167YB G 243.13 15 6 2E1+M2 +0.06 AP 0.0382 AP
167YB2 G %IG=0.26 9
167YB cG E$weighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=243.5 {I5}, I|g=6 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=9.0 {I15}, scaled to 20 {I3} probably
167YB2cG for 242.8|g+243.5|g doublet (1976Me06)
167YB cG E$from 1975VyZY. Other: 243.4 {I1} (1971Ab04) probably for
167YB2cG 242.8|g+243.5|g doublet.
167YB2 G A2=-0.15 20 $ EKC=0.022 10
167YBS G KC AP 0.0318$LC AP 0.00497$MC AP 0.001116
167YBS G NC AP 0.000260$OC AP 3.58E-5$PC AP 1.685E-6
167YB cG $|a(K)exp implies |d|<0.06; |g(|q) gives |d=+0.20 {I14} (1981Kr08).
167YB L 308.401 14 (7/2)-
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.12 10 0.9 8 7.6 +7-3 1.0 8
167YBS E EAV=780 18$CK=0.728 8$CL=0.1135 12$CM+=0.03605 32
167YB G 95.27 2 6.2 12M1+E2 0.16 3.88 5 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 6
167YB cG $E|g=95.27 {I2}, I|g=6.2 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=3.0 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=38 {I10}:3.4:0.52:0.13 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=6.1 20
167YBS G KC=3.19 4$LC=0.537 8$MC=0.1214 17
167YBS G NC=0.0284 4$OC=0.00398 6$PC=0.0001948 27
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=1.25:0.13:<0.02 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 229.78 4 26.5 15M1+E2 -0.39 +20-240.304 24 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=1.15 12
167YB cG $E|g=229.78 {I4}, I|g=26.5 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=11.6 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=6.5 {I13}:0.91:<0.15 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.25 5$ A2=-0.09 19
167YBS G KC=0.251 25$LC=0.0416 9$MC=0.00941 29
167YBS G NC=0.00220 6$OC=0.000308 4$PC=1.50E-5 17
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.31:0.05:<0.009 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 274.41 2 6 1(E1) 0.0248235 d
167YBL G FL=33.916
167YB2 G %IG=0.26 5
167YB cG $E|g=274.41 {I2}, I|g=6 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.26 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.2 {I2}, scaled to 4.8 {I4} (1976Me06,
167YB2cG unplaced)
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values. Somewhat poor fit in the
167YB2cG decay scheme as level-energy difference=274.49
167YB2 G EKC=0.043 15
167YBS G KC=0.02086 29$LC=0.00309 4$MC=0.000689 10
167YBS G NC=0.0001602 22$OC=2.213E-5 31$PC=1.048E-6 15
167YB G 278.9 1 46 9[E1] 0.0238433 d
167YB2 G %IG=2.0 4
167YB cG $E|g=278.9 {I1}, I|g=107 {I10} for 278.2|g+278.9|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=21 {I4}, scaled to 46 {I9} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06, deduced from |g|g-coin from 278.22|g, 278.5|g,
167YB2cG 178.92|g (unresolved) triplet
167YB cG $K:L1=2.5 {I5}:0.18 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.054 15
167YBS G KC=0.02004 28$LC=0.00297 4$MC=0.000661 9
167YBS G NC=0.0001538 22$OC=2.124E-5 30$PC=1.008E-6 14
167YB cG $K:L1=0.057:0.007 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $Ice(K) in 1975VyZY may include contribution from the 278.5|g
167YB2cG established by 1976Me06 using |g|g-coin. If the 278.9|g is E1 (as
167YB3cG required by the level scheme), Ice(K)=1.6 {I6} and |a(K)exp=0.07 {I3}
167YB4cG for the 278.5|g component, consistent with E2 multipolarity.
167YB G 308.47 8 8.7 9 M1 0.1460 20 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.38 5
167YB cG $E|g=308.47 {I8}, I|g=8.7 {I9} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=308.47 {I9}, I|g=3.4 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=1.3 {I3}:0.21:<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.15 4$ A2=-0.46 71
167YBS G KC=0.1225 17$LC=0.01835 26$MC=0.00410 6
167YBS G NC=0.000963 13$OC=0.0001379 19$PC=7.40E-6 10
167YB cG MR$+0.04|<|d|<+4.53 or |<-5.7 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08).
167YB L 317.488 17 (7/2)- D
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB G 39.33 4 [M1,E2] 1.0E+2 9 2 APb
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YBS G L/T=0.8 5$M/T=0.19 22
167YBS G N/T=0.04 5$O/T=0.005 6$P/T=1.5E-5 17
167YBS G LC=8.E1 7$MC=19 17
167YBS G NC=4 4$OC=0.5 4$PC=0.0015 11
167YB cG TI,M$Ice(L1)=1.5, I|g|<0.8 (1975VyZY), so |a(L1)exp|>1.9, consistent
167YB2cG with M1(+E2), with E1 ruled out. I(|g+ce)<3 if M1, |?440 if E2.
167YB G 78.33 2 13 4M1+E2 0.15 6.86 10 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 18
167YB cG $E|g=78.33 {I2}, I|g=52.5 {I25} for 78.33|g+78.67|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=6 {I2}, scaled to 13 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=88 {I25}:26:4.3:2.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=7 3
167YBS G KC=5.60 8$LC=0.973 14$MC=0.2206 31
167YBS G NC=0.0516 7$OC=0.00718 10$PC=0.000344 5
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2=5.25:0.63:0.12:<0.06:0.12:<0.02 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 138.7 2 4.4 15[M1,E2] 1.14 19
167YB2 G %IG=0.19 7
167YBS G KC=0.78 33$LC=0.27 11$MC=0.065 28
167YBS G NC=0.015 6$OC=0.0019 6$PC=4.4E-5 24
167YB cG $Placement from 1976Me06
167YB cG $E|g=138.7 {I2}, I|g|?5 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.0 {I7}, scaled to 4.4 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB G 239.0 1 22 11M1 0.292 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.0 5
167YB cG $E|g=239.0 {I1}, I|g=237 {I10} for 239.0|g+239.22|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=10 {I5}, scaled to 22 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=5.4 {I10}:0.77:0.21:<0.08 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.25 13
167YBS G KC=0.2442 34$LC=0.0368 5$MC=0.00824 12
167YBS G NC=0.001935 27$OC=0.000277 4$PC=1.481E-5 21
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.23:0.034:<0.011 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 317.55 10 46.8 30M1(+E2) -0.05 13 0.1349 28 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=2.03 22
167YB cG E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04
167YB cG $E|g=317.55 {I10}, I|g=46.8 {I30} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=317.65 {I10}, I|g=17.0 {I12} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=4.3 {I8}:1.08:<0.08 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.092 18$ A2=+0.43 23
167YBS G KC=0.1132 25$LC=0.01695 26$MC=0.00379 6
167YBS G NC=0.000890 13$OC=0.0001274 21$PC=6.83E-6 16
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.19:0.033:<0.011 (1971Ab04)
167YB L 410.979 17 7/2-
167YB cL $1976Gr06 placed 352.6|g from this level, but 1976Me06 assigned
167YB2cL 352.03|g from 430 level
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.32 9 2.8 8 7.09 11 3.1 8
167YBS E EAV=735 18$CK=0.744 7$CL=0.1161 11$CM+=0.03690 30
167YB G 102.56 2 6.6 15M1+E2 0.22 5 3.13 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.29 7
167YB cG $E|g=102.56 {I2}, I|g=16.5 {I30} for 102.56|g+102.08|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.0 {I7}, scaled to 6.6 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=24 {I7}:4.1:0.77 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=3.6 13
167YBS G KC=2.55 5$LC=0.452 25$MC=0.103 6
167YBS G NC=0.0240 14$OC=0.00332 15$PC=0.0001550 34
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1=1.25:0.14:0.02:0.011:0.34 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 197.80 5 5 AP(E2) 0.279 4 &
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.217
167YB cG $Ice(K)=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.20
167YBS G KC=0.1702 24$LC=0.0832 12$MC=0.02012 28
167YBS G NC=0.00462 6$OC=0.000556 8$PC=7.94E-6 11
167YB cG $|a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 232.12 4 4.6 4M1(+E2) -1.4 16 0.22 9 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=0.200 25
167YB cG $E|g=232.12 {I4}, I|g=5.3 {I13} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.1 {I2}, scaled to 4.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.76 {I15}:0.16:<0.16 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.17 4$ A2=-0.66 50
167YBS G KC=0.16 10$LC=0.0423 23$MC=0.0099 10
167YBS G NC=0.00230 19$OC=0.000296 6$PC=9.E-6 7
167YB cG MR$-3.0|<|d|<+0.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08).
167YB G 332.36 10 4.5 12M1(+E2) 1.5 LT 0.097 23 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 6
167YB cG $E|g=332.3 {I1}, I|g=4.5 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.4 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=332.48 {I15}, I|g=1.3 {I2}, scaled to 3.6 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.09 3
167YBS G KC=0.079 21$LC=0.0137 13$MC=0.00311 24
167YBS G NC=0.00073 6$OC=0.000101 12$PC=4.7E-6 14
167YB cG $Placement of 332.36|g from 411 or 571 levels in 1976Me06, whereas
167YB2cG 1976Gr06 suggested placement only from 411 level
167YB G 377.03 9 24.9 20E1+M2 +0.08 AP 0.01339AP
167YB2 G %IG=1.08 13
167YB cG $E|g=377.00 {I9}, I|g=24.9 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.23 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=377.08 {I11}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0092 21 $ A2=-0.92 42
167YBS G KC AP 0.01122$LC AP 0.001693$MC AP 0.000379
167YBS G NC AP 8.84E-5$OC AP 1.237E-5$PC AP 6.12E-7
167YB cG MR$|<0.08 from |a(K)exp; +0.08|<|d|<+0.90 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 381.43 15 16.8 17E1 0.0112016
167YB2 G %IG=0.73 10
167YB cG $E|g=381.50 {I15}, I|g=19.1 {I25} for 381.50|g+382.00|g,
167YB2cG Ice(K)=0.18 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=381.35 {I15}, I|g=6.0 {I6}, scaled to 16.8 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC=0.011 3
167YBS G KC=0.00945 13$LC=0.001370 19$MC=0.000305 4
167YBS G NC=7.10E-5 10$OC=9.91E-6 14$PC=4.88E-7 7
167YB G 410.96 10 19.9 24 M1+E2 -3.1 +14-490.034 6 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.86 13
167YB cG $E|g=411.06 {I10}, I|g=19.9 {I24}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=410.86 {I10}, I|g=6.3 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.51 35 $ EKC=0.025 6
167YBS G KC=0.026 6$LC=0.0057 5$MC=0.00133 10
167YBS G NC=0.000309 25$OC=4.1E-5 4$PC=1.4E-6 4
167YB L 419.540 17 (9/2)- D
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB G 102.08 2 11.0 22M1+E2 0.17 +5-6 3.18 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.48 11
167YB cG $E|g=102.08 {I2}, I|g=16.5 {I30} for 102.08|g+102.56|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=5.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06.
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=28 {I7}:5.2:0.77 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=2.5 8
167YBS G KC=2.61 5$LC=0.438 21$MC=0.099 5
167YBS G NC=0.0232 12$OC=0.00325 13$PC=0.0001593 31
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:M1=1.37:0.17:<0.02:0.05 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 111.10 5 2 LT[M1,E2] 2.32 18 7 LTx
167YB2 G %IG LT 0.087
167YB cG TI$based on Ice(K)=1.8 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $Ice(K)=5.0 {I11} if E2, 2.2 {I5} if M1 (Rosel |a(K)).
167YB2 G EKC GT 0.7
167YBS G K/T=0.43 12$L/T=0.20 9$M/T=0.049 26
167YBS G N/T=0.011 6$O/T=0.0014 6$P/T=2.4E-5 14
167YBS G KC=1.4 6$LC=0.7 4$MC=0.16 9
167YBS G NC=0.037 21$OC=0.0045 21$PC=8.E-5 5
167YB cG M$|a(K)exp rules out E1.
167YB G 180.34 4 10 3E2 0.381 5 x
167YBS G KC=0.2211 31$LC=0.1223 17$MC=0.0297 4
167YBS G NC=0.00681 10$OC=0.000813 11$PC=1.009E-5 14
167YB2 G %IG=0.43 14
167YB cG $K:L2:L3=2.3 {I5}:0.3:0.3 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.23 9
167YB G 240.8 2 5 2M1 0.286 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.22 9
167YB cG $E|g=240.8 {I2}, I|g=5 {I2}, Ice(K)=1.3 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<3 (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.26 12
167YBS G KC=0.2393 34$LC=0.0361 5$MC=0.00807 11
167YBS G NC=0.001895 27$OC=0.000271 4$PC=1.451E-5 21
167YB G 340.90 15 10.5 15M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.102 10 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 8
167YB cG E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04
167YB cG $E|g=340.90 {I15}, I|g=10.5 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $Uncertainty in 1975VyZY is assumed to be 0.15 keV as in 1971Ab04,
167YB2cG rather than 1.5 keV
167YB cG $E|g=340.91 {I15}, I|g=4.2 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=1.1 {I2}:0.1:<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.105 24
167YBS G KC=0.085 9$LC=0.0134 6$MC=0.00302 12
167YBS G NC=0.000707 30$OC=0.000100 6$PC=5.0E-6 6
167YB G 385.55 12 18.9 20(E1) 0.0109215 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.82 11
167YB cG $Placement from 1976Me06
167YB cG $E|g=385.68 {I15}, I|g=18.9 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.24 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=385.46 {I12}, I|g=6.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0127 25
167YBS G KC=0.00921 13$LC=0.001335 19$MC=0.000297 4
167YBS G NC=6.92E-5 10$OC=9.66E-6 14$PC=4.77E-7 7
167YB cG M$|a(K)exp gives E1 for doubly-placed |g.
167YB L 430.87 5 7/2+
167YB cL J$7/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.27 5 2.4 4 7.14 7 2.7 4
167YBS E EAV=726 18$CK=0.747 7$CL=0.1166 11$CM+=0.03706 30
167YB G 352.3 2 4.8 4(E1) 0.0135119
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 3
167YB cG $Placement from 1976Me06
167YB cG $E|g=352.3 {I2}, I|g=9.8 {I25} for 352.3|g+350.5|g, Ice(K)=0.06 {I2}
167YB2cG (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=352.03 {I10}, I|g=3.4 {I3}, scaled to 9.5 {I8} (1976Me06),
167YB2cG probably for 350.5+352.3 doublet as in 1975VyZY
167YB cG RI,M$I|g=9.5 {I8} (1976Me06), presumably for 350.5|g+352.3|g doublet
167YB2cG since, otherwise, |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} for this doublet in 1975VyZY,
167YB3cG too low to be consistent with E1. Ice(K)=0.06 {I2} for each component
167YB4cG (1975VyZY) favors E1 for each, therefore, evaluators assign
167YB5cG I|g=4.8 {I4} for each |g.
167YB2 G A2=-0.28 65
167YBS G KC=0.01138 16$LC=0.001660 23$MC=0.000369 5
167YBS G NC=8.60E-5 12$OC=1.198E-5 17$PC=5.85E-7 8
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.26 {I+70-90} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); anisotropy excludes
167YB3cG J(431)=5/2 based on magnitude of |d required if |DJ=2 (1981Kr08).
167YB4cG |a(K)exp=0.007 {I2} for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 372.5 1 8.4 8 M1 0.0884 12 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 5
167YB cG E$from 1975VyZY. 1976Me06 quote the same value as in 1971Ab04
167YB cG $E|g=372.5 {I1}, I|g=8.8 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.8 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=372.38 {I15}, I|g=3.0 {I3}, scaled to 8.4 {I8} (1976Me06,
167YB2cG unplaced)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC=0.09 3
167YBS G KC=0.0742 10$LC=0.01105 15$MC=0.002468 35
167YBS G NC=0.000580 8$OC=8.31E-5 12$PC=4.47E-6 6
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.049:0.009:<0.002 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 396.94 10 21.6 21M1+E2 -0.41 +20-310.069 8 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.94 12
167YB cG $E|g=396.83 {I15}, I|g=21.6 {I21} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=396.99 {I10}, I|g=8.0 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.9 {I2}:0.077:<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.042 12 $A2=-0.09 21
167YBS G KC=0.057 8$LC=0.0089 6$MC=0.00199 13
167YBS G NC=0.000467 32$OC=6.6E-5 5$PC=3.4E-6 5
167YB G 401.15 10 82.0 41M1(+E2) -0.02 9 0.0727 11 g
167YB2 G %IG=3.6 4
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=401.25 {I6}, I|g=82.0 {I41} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=401.05 {I7}, I|g=28.0 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=5.16:0.75:<0.10 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G A2=+0.36 18
167YBS G KC=0.0610 10$LC=0.00907 13$MC=0.002026 29
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.193:0.033:<0.008 (1971Ab04)
167YBS G NC=0.000476 7$OC=6.82E-5 10$PC=3.67E-6 6
167YB cG MR$-0.02 {I9} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB L 440.676 15 7/2- C
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB G 21.16 3 M1+E2 0.10 2 94 18 12 APX
167YBS G L/T=0.77 10$M/T=0.18 4
167YBS G N/T=0.041 11$O/T=0.0053 13$P/T=0.000172 32
167YBS G LC=73 14$MC=16.9 33
167YBS G NC=3.9 8$OC=0.50 8$PC=0.01640 24
167YB cG TI$Ice(L1+L2)=6.7 and adopted mult; I|g|?0.12 from I(|g+ce).
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=4.6:2.1:<2.0 (1975VyZY)
167YB G 123.19 3 13.1 13M1+E2 0.7 5 1.73 12 d
167YBF G FLAG=W
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 8
167YB cG $E|g=123.19 {I3}, I|g=13.1 {I13} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=15 {I4}:2.6:|<0.26 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=1.1 3
167YBS G KC=1.25 27$LC=0.37 12$MC=0.088 31
167YBS G NC=0.020 7$OC=0.0026 7$PC=7.2E-5 20
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.57:0.1:|?0.021:0.008 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 132.28 4 [M1,E2] 1.32 20 3.0 APX
167YBS G K/T=0.38 10$L/T=0.14 5$M/T=0.034 15
167YBS G N/T=0.0078 35$O/T=1.0E-3 4$P/T=2.1E-5 12
167YBS G KC=0.9 4$LC=0.33 14$MC=0.08 4
167YBS G NC=0.018 8$OC=0.0023 8$PC=5.0E-5 28
167YB cG TI$based on Ice(K)=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY) assuming mult=M1,E2.
167YB G 162.42 4 1.0 3M1 0.851 12 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.043 14
167YB cG $E|g=162.42 {I4}, I|g=1.0 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g<1 (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L2:L3=1.3 {I3}:0.08:|<0.08 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=1.3 5
167YBS G KC=0.712 10$LC=0.1082 15$MC=0.02421 34
167YBS G NC=0.00569 8$OC=0.000813 11$PC=4.34E-5 6
167YB G 182.07 4 44.0 22E2 0.369 5 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.91 20
167YB cG $E|g=182.07 {I4}, I|g=41.0 {I28} (1975VyZY); evaluators assume
167YB2cG that uncertainty of 28 in 1975VyZY is a misprint
167YB cG $I|g=20 {I1}, scaled to 44.0 {I22} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=8.8 {I20}:0.77:1.42:1.3 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.18 4
167YBS G KC=0.2152 30$LC=0.1174 16$MC=0.0285 4
167YBS G NC=0.00654 9$OC=0.000781 11$PC=9.84E-6 14
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.34:0.05:0.075:0.05 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 201.56 5 2.2 7(E2) 0.262 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YB cG $E|g=201.56 {I5}, I|g=5 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.5 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I3}, scaled to 2.2 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC=0.20 10 $ EKC=0.10 6
167YBS G KC=0.1614 23$LC=0.0769 11$MC=0.01860 26
167YBS G NC=0.00427 6$OC=0.000515 7$PC=7.56E-6 11
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1976Me06, second in 1975VyZY
167YB G 261.85 2 28.0 15M1(+E2) -0.06 10 0.227 4 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=1.22 13
167YB cG $E|g=261.85 {I2}, I|g=28.0 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=14.0 {I10}, scaled to 30.8 {I22} (1976Me06),
167YB2cG which may be for 261.85|g+263.5|g doublet in 1975VyZY
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=5.4 {I10}:0.91:<0.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.19 4$ A2=+0.06 15
167YBS G KC=0.190 4$LC=0.0287 4$MC=0.00641 9
167YBS G NC=0.001505 21$OC=0.0002153 31$PC=1.151E-5 23
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.21:0.034:|?0.005 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 361.82 25 11.2 15M1(+E2) +1.6 +21-6 0.057 12 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.49 8
167YB cG $E|g=362.0 {I2}, I|g=11.2 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.52 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=361.53 {I25}, I|g=3.3 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.62 62 $ EKC=0.046 11
167YBS G KC=0.045 11$LC=0.0094 8$MC=0.00216 16
167YBS G NC=0.00050 4$OC=6.7E-5 7$PC=2.6E-6 7
167YB cG MR$-0.5|<|d|<+3.6 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), 1.6 {I+24-6} from |a(K)exp
167YB G 406.72 10 15.7 19E1(+M2) 0.11 LE 0.0110 14
167YB2 G %IG=0.68 10
167YB cG $E|g=406.73 {I11}, I|g=15.7 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=406.71 {I15}, I|g=5.2 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.46 28 $ EKC=0.0083 22
167YBS G KC=0.0093 11$LC=0.00138 21$MC=0.00031 5
167YBS G NC=7.2E-5 11$OC=1.01E-5 16$PC=5.0E-7 8
167YB cG MR$-0.3|<|d|<+2.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.11 from |a(K)exp
167YB L 477.43 3 9/2- C
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.21 AP 2.1 AP 7.2 AP 2.3 AP
167YBS E EAV=706 18$CK=0.753 7$CL=0.1177 11$CM+=0.03742 29
167YB G 36.79 3 0.23 AP M1+E2 0.10 +4-6 12.9 24 3.2 APx
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.010
167YB cG TI$from Ice(L1)=1.8 and adopted mult.
167YB cG RI$|?0.23 from I(|g+ce), adopted mult and |d. Other: |<1.3 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=1.8:|?0.4:|?0.4 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G ELC GE 2
167YBS G LC=10.0 19$MC=2.3 5
167YBS G NC=0.53 10$OC=0.073 12$PC=0.00318 5
167YB G 57.60 2 [M1,E2] 16 14 23 APd ?
167YBF G FL=419.540
167YBS G LC=13 10$MC=3.1 26
167YBS G NC=0.7 6$OC=0.08 6$PC=5.E-4 4
167YB cG $E|g=57.60 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG TI$from Ice(L)|?18 and assumed mult.
167YB cG $L1:L2:L3=9.0:|<4:|?7 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $1975VyZY suggest mult=(E1) is inconsistent with this placement; note
167YB2cG also that E|g fits poorly, with level-energy difference=57.89.
167YB3cG Evaluators show tentative placement
167YB G 199.12 5 23 3E2 0.273 4 d
167YB2 G %IG=1.00 16
167YB cG $E|g=199.12 {I5}, I|g=23.0 {I34} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=12 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=3.0 {I8}:0.31:0.52:0.44 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.13 4
167YBS G KC=0.1670 23$LC=0.0809 11$MC=0.01957 27
167YBS G NC=0.00449 6$OC=0.000541 8$PC=7.80E-6 11
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.14:0.02:0.03:0.02 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 298.6 1 9.0 22 M1(+E2) +0.4 5 0.15 3 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=0.39 10
167YB cG $E|g=298.6 {I1}, I|g=9.0 {I22} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=3.0 {I6}, scaled to 6.6 {I13} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1=0.63 {I12}:0.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.070 22$ A2=-0.87 47
167YBS G KC=0.123 25$LC=0.0196 11$MC=0.00440 18
167YBS G NC=0.00103 5$OC=0.000146 12$PC=7.3E-6 17
167YB cG MR$-0.1|<|d|<+0.9 (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp inconsistent with pure
167YB2cG M1 or pure E2
167YB G 398.83 15 11.2 12[M1,E2] 0.053 21 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.49 7
167YB cG $E|g=398.80 {I15}, I|g=11.2 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=398.94 {I30}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06, placed only from 677 level)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=0.51 {I10}:0.08:<0.06 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.046 10
167YBS G KC=0.043 19$LC=0.0076 16$MC=0.00173 33
167YB cG $K:L1=0.023:0.0034 (1971Ab04)
167YBS G NC=0.00040 8$OC=5.6E-5 14$PC=2.5E-6 12
167YB cG M$(M1+E2) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 443.0 9 4.2 17 [E1] 0.0079412 &
167YBF G FLAG=z
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 8
167YBS G KC=0.00671 10$LC=0.000963 14$MC=0.0002140 32
167YBS G NC=4.99E-5 7$OC=7.00E-6 10$PC=3.50E-7 5
167YB cG $I|g=1.5 {I6} (1976Me06) scaled to 4.2 {I17}
167YB cG E$1976Me06 proposed alternative placement of 443.0|g from 569.4 level,
167YB2cG which would be consistent only with mult(443.0|g)=E2 and J|p(569.4
167YB3cG level)=7/2+.
167YB G 477.32 35 2.0 6 [E2] 0.0200928 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 3
167YBS G KC=0.01570 22$LC=0.00339 5$MC=0.000787 11
167YBS G NC=0.0001826 26$OC=2.412E-5 34$PC=8.58E-7 12
167YB cG $I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06) scaled to 2.0 {I6}
167YB L 553.38 3 9/2-
167YB cL J$9/2- from |g(|q) in 1981Kr08 as 236|g(|q) and 427|g(|q) exclude
167YB2cL J(553)=11/2.
167YB E 0.055 24 0.64 30 7.67 19 0.7 3
167YBS E EAV=672 18$CK=0.764 6$CL=0.1195 10$CM+=0.03799 27
167YB G 133.84 3 10.5 15M1(+E2) 0.09 LT 1.468 21 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 8
167YB cG $E|g=133.84 {I3}, I|g=10.5 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=5.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L2:L3=9 {I2}:|?0.08: <0.08 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.86 23
167YBS G KC=1.226 17$LC=0.1883 28$MC=0.0422 7
167YBS G NC=0.00991 15$OC=0.001413 21$PC=7.47E-5 11
167YB G 235.9 4 22.7 30M1+E2 -2.7 +11-250.174 23 d
167YBF G FLAG=g
167YB2 G %IG=0.99 16
167YB cG $E|g=235.9 {I4}, I|g=22.7 {I30} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=9.2 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=2.0 {I4}:0.43:0.46:0.4 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.088 21$ A2=+0.62 29
167YBS G KC=0.121 24$LC=0.0405 8$MC=0.00965 25
167YBS G NC=0.00222 5$OC=0.000277 5$PC=6.3E-6 17
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.086:0.017:0.018:0.015 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 374.5 2 4.2 14M1,E2 0.063 24 d
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 6
167YB cG $E|g=374.5 {I2}, I|g=8 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.26 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=374.90 {I20}, I|g=1.5 {I5}, scaled to 4.2 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06; 8 {I3} in 1975VyZY.
167YB2 G EKC=0.062 25 $ EKC=0.033 14
167YBS G KC=0.051 22$LC=0.0092 17$MC=0.00209 35
167YBS G NC=0.00049 8$OC=6.7E-5 15$PC=3.0E-6 14
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1976Me06, second in 1975VyZY
167YB G 427.46 18 5.7 11(E1(+M2)) +0.15 23 0.013 21 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.25 5
167YB cG $E|g=427.7 {I2}, I|g=5.7 {I11}, Ice(K)=0.16 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=427.32 {I15}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.69 64 $ EKC=0.028 9
167YBS G KC=0.011 17$LC=0.0017 31$MC=4.E-4 7
167YBS G NC=9.E-5 17$OC=1.3E-5 23$PC=6.E-7 12
167YB cG MR$-0.08|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.38 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). Other:
167YB2cG |d=0.38 {I+9-10} from |a(K)exp. |D|p=yes from level scheme
167YB G 494.60 18 7.2 15 [E1] 0.00621 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.31 7
167YB cG $E|g=494.8 {I2}, I|g=7.2 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.07 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=494.44 {I18}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I14} (1976Me06,
167YB2cG unplaced)
167YB2 G EKC=0.010 3
167YBS G KC=0.00525 7$LC=0.000749 11$MC=0.0001662 23
167YBS G NC=3.88E-5 5$OC=5.45E-6 8$PC=2.76E-7 4
167YB cG M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme
167YB L 569.39 10 (7/2)+
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$3/2+,5/2+,7/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.053 16 0.65 20 7.67 13 0.7 2
167YBS E EAV=665 18$CK=0.766 6$CL=0.1198 10$CM+=0.03811 27
167YB G 330.32 20 2.2 6 [E1] 0.0157622
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YBS G KC=0.01327 19$LC=0.001944 27$MC=0.000432 6
167YBS G NC=0.0001007 14$OC=1.399E-5 20$PC=6.78E-7 10
167YB cG $E|g=330.2 {I2}, I|g=4.0 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=330.58 {I30}, I|g=0.8 {I2}, scaled to 2.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB G 356.23 15 7.9 15E1 0.0131618
167YB2 G %IG=0.34 7
167YB cG $E|g=356.36 {I17}, I|g=7.9 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.08 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=356.12 {I15}, I|g=2.1 {I3}, scaled to 5.9 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.010 3 $ EKC=0.015 4
167YBS G KC=0.01109 16$LC=0.001616 23$MC=0.000359 5
167YBS G NC=8.37E-5 12$OC=1.166E-5 16$PC=5.70E-7 8
167YB cG M$first |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 443.0 9 4.2 17 [E2] 0.0244 4 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 8
167YBS G KC=0.01889 28$LC=0.00428 7$MC=0.000997 15
167YBS G NC=0.000231 4$OC=3.03E-5 5$PC=1.024E-6 15
167YB G 539.66 20 5.8 15 [M1,E2] 0.024 9 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.25 7
167YB cG $E|g=539.7 {I2}, I|g=5.8 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.17 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=539.50 {I40}, I|g=2.2 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.77 70 $ A2=+0.71 65 $ A2=+0.94 86$ EKC=0.029 10
167YBS G KC=0.020 8$LC=0.0033 9$MC=7.4E-4 19
167YBS G NC=1.7E-4 5$OC=2.4E-5 7$PC=1.2E-6 5
167YB cG MR$-13.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.2 for first A{-2} if J(569)=7/2;
167YB2cG -|@|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.5 for second A{-2} if J(569)=5/2;
167YB3cG -4.16|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.02 for third A{-2} if J(569)=3/2 (1981Kr08).
167YB4cG M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp for doubly-placed |g.
167YB cG $Double placement suggested in 1981Kr08 only
167YB L 571.489 19 (11/2)- 180 NS AP E
167YB cL T$|g|g(t) (1975VyZY).
167YB cL $Placement of 332.36|g from 411 or 571 levels in 1976Me06, whereas
167YB2cL 1976Gr06 placed this |g only from 411 level
167YB cL J$11/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.026 18 1.2 8 8.76 29 1.2 8 1U
167YBS E EAV=673 17$CK=0.8046 22$CL=0.13163 46$CM+=0.04213 18
167YB G 151.96 2 5.8 17M1(+E2) 1.6 LT 0.90 12 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.25 8
167YB cG $E|g=151.96 {I2}, I|g=5.8 {I17} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=2.4 {I2}, scaled to 5.3 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1=3.9 {I8}:0.54 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.67 24
167YBS G KC=0.68 18$LC=0.18 4$MC=0.041 12
167YBS G NC=0.0095 27$OC=0.00123 25$PC=3.9E-5 13
167YB cG $K:L1:L3=0.14:0.02:0.006 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 160.49 2 7.3 16[E2] 0.569 8 &
167YBS G KC=0.306 4$LC=0.2010 28$MC=0.0490 7
167YBS G NC=0.01122 16$OC=0.001327 19$PC=1.362E-5 19
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 8
167YB cG M$|DJ=2 from level scheme.
167YB G 254.0 2 7.5 20[E2] 0.1236 18 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 9
167YB cG $K:L1=1.2 {I2}:0.1 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.16 3
167YBS G KC=0.0838 12$LC=0.0306 4$MC=0.00731 10
167YBS G NC=0.001683 24$OC=0.0002077 30$PC=4.14E-6 6
167YB cG $M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp, but placement disallows M1.
167YB G 270.00 10 2.20 22[M1,E2] 0.16 5
167YBS G KC=0.12 5$LC=0.0253 11$MC=0.00583 10
167YBS G NC=0.001356 34$OC=0.000182 17$PC=7.1E-6 35
167YB2 G %IG=0.096 13
167YB cG $E|g=270.0 {I2}, I|g|?2 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I1}, scaled to 2.20 {I22} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB G 385.55 12 18.9 20(E1) 0.0109215 &
167YBS G KC=0.00921 13$LC=0.001335 19$MC=0.000297 4
167YBS G NC=6.92E-5 10$OC=9.66E-6 14$PC=4.77E-7 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.82 11
167YB cG M$E1 for doubly-placed |g.
167YB cG $Placement from 1976Gr06 only
167YB G 392.61 10 19.7 20M1+E2 +0.31 +17-130.073 4 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.86 12
167YB cG $E|g=392.75 {I15}, I|g=19.7 {I20} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=392.55 {I10}, I|g=6.0 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $K:L1:L2=1.35 {I20}:0.34:<0.05 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.069 12$ A2=-0.26 22
167YBS G KC=0.061 4$LC=0.00932 35$MC=0.00209 7
167YBS G NC=0.000490 17$OC=6.98E-5 29$PC=3.66E-6 26
167YB cG $K:L1=0.031:0.0057 (1971Ab04)
167YB G 445.56 12 33 2 E1(+M2) 0.11 LE 0.0089 11
167YB2 G %IG=1.43 16
167YB cG $E|g=445.65 {I8}, I|g=33 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.24 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=445.41 {I10}, I|g=10.5 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.69 26 $ EKC=0.0073 10
167YBS G KC=0.0075 9$LC=0.00110 15$MC=0.000246 35
167YBS G NC=5.8E-5 8$OC=8.1E-6 12$PC=4.1E-7 6
167YB cG MR$-0.01|<|d|<+0.70 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.11 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 513.1 1 50 10(E1) 0.00573 8
167YB2 G %IG=2.2 5
167YB cG $E|g=513.1 {I1}, I|g=50 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.38 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=513.30 {I80}, I|g=12.0 {I40} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0076 25
167YBS G KC=0.00484 7$LC=0.000690 10$MC=0.0001530 21
167YBS G NC=3.57E-5 5$OC=5.03E-6 7$PC=2.55E-7 4
167YB L 628.62 6 7/2+
167YB cL J$7/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.07 4 0.9 6 7.5 3 1.0 6
167YBS E EAV=639 18$CK=0.773 6$CL=0.1211 9$CM+=0.03851 25
167YB G 197.80 5 5 AP(E2) 0.279 4 &
167YBL G FL=430.87
167YBS G KC=0.1702 24$LC=0.0832 12$MC=0.02012 28
167YBS G NC=0.00462 6$OC=0.000556 8$PC=7.94E-6 11
167YB2 G %IG AP 0.217
167YB G 570.0 2 14 6M1(+E2) -0.3 10 0.028 9 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.6 3
167YB cG E$from 1975VyZY; E|g=569.86 {I13} in 1976Me06 is possibly for a
167YB2cG doublet.
167YB cG RI$I|g=16.9 {I30} for 570.0|g+570.7|g in 1975VyZY; 5.0 {I4} scaled to
167YB2cG 14.0 {I11} in 1976Me06. From Ice(K)(570.0|g), |a(K)exp(570.0|g) (ruling
167YB3cG out E1), and I|g(570.0)|>10 {I2} assuming |a(K)exp|<|a(K)
167YB4cG (M1 theory), evaluators adopt I|g=14 {I6} for this component of the
167YB5cG doublet, leaving I|g=3 {I7} for the 570.7|g. Alternatively, from
167YB6cG Ice(K)(570.7|g), I|g(570.7)|<13 {I3} and |>2, respectively, assuming
167YB7cG |a(K)exp|>|a(K)(E1) and |<|a(K)(M1).
167YB2 G A2=-0.69 20 $ EKC GE 0.015 4
167YBS G KC=0.023 8$LC=0.0035 9$MC=0.00078 19
167YBS G NC=0.00018 4$OC=2.6E-5 7$PC=1.4E-6 5
167YB cG MR$-1.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.7 from |g(|q)
167YB G 594.51 20 8.5 15[M1,E2] 0.019 7 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 7
167YB cG $E|g=594.6 {I2}, I|g=8.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.17 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=594.30 {I30}, I|g=3.2 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.8 6 $ EKC=0.020 6
167YBS G KC=0.016 6$LC=0.0025 7$MC=5.7E-4 16
167YBS G NC=1.3E-4 4$OC=1.9E-5 6$PC=9.E-7 4
167YB cG M$M1(+E2) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 599.35 35 16.2 17M1+E2 +0.14 12 0.0255 7 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.70 10
167YB cG E$unweighted average of the two values
167YB cG $E|g=599.7 {I2}, I|g=16.0 {I27}, Ice(K)=0.36 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=599.00 {I20}, I|g=5.8 {I6}, scaled to 16.2 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G A2=+0.07 22 $ EKC=0.022 4
167YBS G KC=0.0214 6$LC=0.00315 8$MC=0.000702 17
167YBS G NC=0.000165 4$OC=2.36E-5 6$PC=1.28E-6 4
167YB L 677.18 6 (5/2,7/2)-
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB G 368.80 10 5.6 8[M1,E2] 0.066 25 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 4
167YB cG $E|g=368.85 {I10}, I|g=6.2 {I20} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=368.61 {I20}, I|g=2.0 {I3}, scaled to 5.6 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G EKC=0.042 16
167YBS G KC=0.053 23$LC=0.0096 18$MC=0.00219 35
167YBS G NC=0.00051 9$OC=7.0E-5 15$PC=3.1E-6 15
167YB cG M$E2(+M1) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 398.83 13 11.2 12[M1,E2] 0.053 21 &
167YBS G KC=0.043 19$LC=0.0076 16$MC=0.00173 33
167YBS G NC=0.00040 8$OC=5.6E-5 14$PC=2.5E-6 12
167YB2 G %IG=0.49 7
167YB cG M$M1+E2 for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 437.75 22 3.0 9M1 0.0578 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 4
167YB cG $E|g=437.2 {I5}, I|g=3.0 {I9}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=437.84 {I20}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.043 16
167YBS G KC=0.0486 7$LC=0.00720 10$MC=0.001608 23
167YBS G NC=0.000378 5$OC=5.41E-5 8$PC=2.92E-6 4
167YB G 464.32 20 4.8 8E2 0.0215930
167YB2 G %IG=0.21 4
167YB cG $E|g=464.4 {I2}, I|g=4.8 {I8}, Ice(K)=0.10 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=464.23 {I20}, I|g=1.9 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.021 7
167YBS G KC=0.01681 24$LC=0.00370 5$MC=0.000858 12
167YBS G NC=0.0001991 28$OC=2.62E-5 4$PC=9.15E-7 13
167YB G 677.23 15 13 2 [M1,E2] 0.014 5 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 10
167YB cG $E|g=677.4 {I2}, I|g=13 {I2}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=677.14 {I15}, I|g=3.0 {I4}, scaled to 8.4 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0031 16 $ EKC=0.0048 24
167YBS G KC=0.011 4$LC=0.0018 5$MC=4.0E-4 12
167YBS G NC=9.4E-5 27$OC=1.3E-5 4$PC=6.7E-7 28
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06, respectively
167YB cG $This |g placed by 1976Me06, 1977Gr21 (and 1981Kr08) from 677 and/or
167YB2cG 1305 level(s); level scheme requires mult=M1,E2 for placement from
167YB3cG 677 level and E1 from 1305 level
167YB L 719.61 9 (7/2)-
167YB cL J$5/2-,7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB G 278.5 24 7(E2) 0.0927 13 z
167YBS G KC=0.0648 9$LC=0.02150 30$MC=0.00512 7
167YBS G NC=0.001180 17$OC=0.0001471 21$PC=3.26E-6 5
167YB2 G %IG=1.0 3
167YB cG RI$from |g|g coin (1976Me06) for components of 278|g triplet
167YB cG M$see comment for 278.9|g.
167YB G 479.88 30 3.0 10 M1,E2 0.033 13 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB cG $E|g=479.4 {I7}, I|g=3 {I1}, Ice(K)|?0.068 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=479.97 {I30}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.023
167YBS G KC=0.027 11$LC=0.0045 12$MC=0.00102 24
167YBS G NC=0.00024 6$OC=3.3E-5 9$PC=1.6E-6 7
167YB cG $Placement of 479.88|g from 719 or 788 level in 1976Me06, whereas
167YB2cG in 1976Gr06, only placed from 788 level
167YB G 539.66 20 5.8 15 [E2] 0.0147321 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.25 7
167YBS G KC=0.01169 16$LC=0.002351 33$MC=0.000542 8
167YBS G NC=0.0001259 18$OC=1.683E-5 24$PC=6.45E-7 9
167YB cG M$M1(+E2) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB cG $Placement from 1981Kr08 only. 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21 placed 539.66|g
167YB2cG from 569 level only
167YB G 640 1 2.0 10(M1(+E2)) 0.016 6 &
167YBF G FLAG=x
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 5
167YB cG $I(ceK)=0.04 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.020 11
167YBS G KC=0.013 5$LC=0.0021 6$MC=4.7E-4 13
167YBS G NC=1.09E-4 31$OC=1.5E-5 5$PC=7.7E-7 33
167YB cG M$M1(+E2) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 685.3 5 4.7 25 [E1] 0.00311 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 11
167YB cG $I(ceK)|<0.03 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.014
167YBS G KC=0.00264 4$LC=0.000369 5$MC=8.18E-5 12
167YBS G NC=1.913E-5 27$OC=2.71E-6 4$PC=1.409E-7 20
167YB cG M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=yes from level scheme.
167YB G 689.7 3 7.7 21 [E1] 0.00307 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 10
167YB cG $E|g=689.8 {I2}, I|g=7.7 {I21}, Ice(K)|<0.03 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=688.85 {I50}, I|g=0.8 {I1}, scaled to 2.2 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0054 $ EKC LE 0.016
167YBS G KC=0.00261 4$LC=0.000365 5$MC=8.07E-5 11
167YBS G NC=1.887E-5 26$OC=2.67E-6 4$PC=1.391E-7 20
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 719.81 25 6.8 6E2(+M1) 1.0 GT 0.0097 22 W
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 4
167YB cG $E|g=719.9 {I3}, I|g=6.8 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.05 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=719.74 {I25}, I|g=1.8 {I3} (1976Me06, unplaced)
167YB2 G EKC=0.007 3
167YBS G KC=0.0080 19$LC=0.00130 23$MC=0.00029 5
167YBS G NC=6.9E-5 12$OC=9.6E-6 18$PC=4.6E-7 12
167YB L 788.36 6 (9/2)-
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.065 24 1.3 5 7.27 16 1.4 5
167YBS E EAV=569 18$CK=0.7902 46$CL=0.1241 8$CM+=0.03950 22
167YB G 368.80 10 5.6 8[M1,E2] 0.066 25 &
167YBS G KC=0.053 23$LC=0.0096 18$MC=0.00219 35
167YBS G NC=0.00051 9$OC=7.0E-5 15$PC=3.1E-6 15
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 4
167YB cG M$E2(+M1) for doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 470.70 20 11.0 10M1+E2 +0.3 AP 0.0456 AP
167YB2 G %IG=0.48 6
167YB cG $E|g=470.8 {I2}, I|g=11 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.54 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=470.55 {I25}, I|g=3.2 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.59 40 $ EKC=0.049 10
167YBS G KC AP 0.0383$LC AP 0.00575$MC AP 0.001286
167YBS G NC AP 0.000302$OC AP 4.31E-5$PC AP 2.286E-6
167YB cG MR$+0.3|<|d|<+10.8 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); |<0.31 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 479.88 30 3.0 10 M1,E2 0.033 13 &
167YBS G KC=0.027 11$LC=0.0045 12$MC=0.00102 24
167YBS G NC=0.00024 6$OC=3.3E-5 9$PC=1.6E-6 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.13 5
167YB G 549.00 30 5.6 15E2(+M3) +0.1 +4-3 0.02 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 7
167YB cG $E|g=549.0 {I5}, I|g=5.6 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.11 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=549.00 {I30}, I|g=1.0 {I3}, scaled to 2.8 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.53 32 $ EKC=0.020 6
167YBS G KC=0.013 35$LC=0.003 7$MC=6.E-4 18
167YBS G NC=1.E-4 4$OC=2.E-5 6$PC=8.E-7 28
167YB G 609.41 16 10.5 15 E2(+M1) 1.2 GE 0.0138 28
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 8
167YB cG $E|g=609.5 {I2}, I|g=10.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.12 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=609.35 {I16}, I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.17 24 $ EKC=0.0114 25
167YBS G KC=0.0113 25$LC=0.00195 28$MC=0.00044 6
167YBS G NC=0.000103 15$OC=1.42E-5 22$PC=6.4E-7 15
167YB cG MR$-|@<|d|<-0.4 or +2.1|<|d|<+|@ from |g(|q) (1981Kr08);
167YB2cG |>1.2 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 709.79 15 13.0 12E2(+M1) 1.8 GE 0.0088 11
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 7
167YB cG $E|g=709.9 {I2}, I|g=13.0 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.075 {I20} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=709.73 {I15}, I|g=3.6 {I5}, scaled to 10.1 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.24 49 $ EKC=0.0058 16
167YBS G KC=0.0072 9$LC=0.00122 11$MC=0.000277 25
167YBS G NC=6.5E-5 6$OC=8.9E-6 9$PC=4.1E-7 6
167YB cG MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.30 {I+50-27} or |>1.8 (magnitude of |d) from |g(|q)
167YB2cG (1981Kr08); smaller |d not consistent with |a(K)exp
167YB G 788.44 20 5.4 6E2 0.00612 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 3
167YB cG $E|g=788.5 {I2}, I|g=5.4 {I6}, Ice(K)=0.03 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=788.38 {I20}, I|g=2.0 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.17 54 $ EKC=0.0056 20
167YBS G KC=0.00502 7$LC=0.000851 12$MC=0.0001929 27
167YBS G NC=4.50E-5 6$OC=6.21E-6 9$PC=2.82E-7 4
167YB cG $|d(O/Q)=-0.25 {I+53-75} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB L 1022.27 7 (5/2,9/2)+
167YB cL J$9/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08, while eliminating 7/2 based on
167YB2cL comparison of |d from 591|g(|q) and that from |a(K)exp.
167YB cL $Placement of 833.61|g in 1976Me06 only from 1022 to 188, 1/2- level
167YB2cL is rejected due to |DJ|p and dominant M1 multipolarity of this |g
167YB E 0.058 12 2.44 30 6.91 6 2.5 3
167YBS E EAV=467 17$CK=0.8084 31$CL=0.1277 5$CM+=0.04065 18
167YB G 591.32 10 22 1 M1+E2 +3.0 +21-120.0133 20 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.96 10
167YB cG $E|g=591.4 {I1}, I|g=22 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.25 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=591.19 {I13}, I|g=8.6 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.55 19 $ EKC=0.0114 23
167YBS G KC=0.0107 18$LC=0.00196 20$MC=0.00045 4
167YBS G NC=0.000104 10$OC=1.42E-5 16$PC=6.1E-7 11
167YB cG MR$other: 2.5 +|@-10 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 705.3 5 2.8 14 [E1] 0.00294 4 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 6
167YBS G KC=0.002492 35$LC=0.000348 5$MC=7.71E-5 11
167YBS G NC=1.802E-5 25$OC=2.55E-6 4$PC=1.331E-7 19
167YB G 963.75 19 11.5 10(E2) 0.00400 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.50 6
167YB cG $E|g=964.0 {I2}, I|g=11.5 {I10}, Ice(K)|?0.023 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=963.61 {I15}, I|g=3.6 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0020
167YBS G KC=0.00332 5$LC=0.000529 7$MC=0.0001190 17
167YBS G NC=2.78E-5 4$OC=3.88E-6 5$PC=1.868E-7 26
167YB cG M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp; |D|p=no from level scheme.
167YB G 988.40 10 27.4 17(M1+E2) +6.4 61 0.0039 32 g
167YB2 G %IG=1.19 13
167YB cG $E|g=988.4 {I2}, I|g=27.4 {I17} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=988.40 {I10}, I|g=9.2 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.57 41
167YBS G KC=0.0032 27$LC=5.E-4 4$MC=1.1E-4 8
167YBS G NC=2.7E-5 18$OC=3.7E-6 27$PC=1.8E-7 17
167YB cG MR$+0.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+12.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), |D|p=no from
167YB2cG level scheme.
167YB L 1267.24 6 5/2+
167YB cL J$5/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.054 13 6.1 6 6.39 5 6.2 6
167YBS E EAV=359 18$CK=0.8194 17$CL=0.13030 39$CM+=0.04153 16
167YB G 855.8 4 5.4 11 [E1] 2.01E-3 3
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 5
167YB cG $E|g=855.9 {I4}, I|g=5.4 {I11}, Ice(K)|?0.034 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=855.70 {I40}, I|g=2.0 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC AP 0.0063
167YBS G KC=0.001706 24$LC=0.0002358 33$MC=5.22E-5 7
167YBS G NC=1.220E-5 17$OC=1.734E-6 24$PC=9.16E-8 13
167YB cG M$M1,E2 from |a(K)exp is inconsistent with |D|p=yes
167YB G 1188.54 10 37.3 19E1(+M2) -0.06 +21-240.0011 8 g
167YB2 G %IG=1.62 17
167YB cG $E|g=1188.6 {I1}, I|g=37.3 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.035 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1188.48 {I10}, I|g=12.9 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.06 28 $ EKC=0.0009 3
167YBS G KC=1.0E-3 7$LC=1.3E-4 10$MC=2.9E-5 24
167YBS G NC=7.E-6 6$OC=1.0E-6 8$PC=5.E-8 4$IPC=1.72E-5 13
167YB G 1267.26 8 100 3E1 1.03E-3 1
167YB2 G %IG=4.3 4
167YB cG $E|g=1267.4 {I2}, I|g=100 {I3}, Ice(K)=0.093 {I20} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1267.24 {I8}, I|g=36.1 {I25} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.00093 20
167YBS G KC=0.000832 12$LC=0.0001129 16$MC=2.492E-5 35
167YBS G NC=5.84E-6 8$OC=8.34E-7 12$PC=4.50E-8 6$IPC=4.97E-5 7
167YB L 1305.53 7 (7/2-)
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21. Alternative placement of 1275|g
167YB2cL from the 1305 level suggested by 1976Me06 and 1976Gr06 rejected by
167YB3cL 1981Kr08 based on inconsistent |d value from |g(|q) data
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 0.012 4 1.6 4 6.96 11 1.6 4
167YBS E EAV=342 18$CK=0.8204 15$CL=0.13063 37$CM+=0.04165 16
167YB G 677.23 15 13 2 [E1] 0.00319 4 &
167YBS G KC=0.00270 4$LC=0.000379 5$MC=8.39E-5 12
167YBS G NC=1.960E-5 27$OC=2.77E-6 4$PC=1.442E-7 20
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 10
167YB G 1092.3 5 3.2 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 4
167YB cG $E|g=1092.5 {I5}, I|g=3.2 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1092.10 {I50}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1126.62 12 16.2 13(M1(+E2)) +0.06 24 0.0053421 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.70 9
167YB cG $E|g=1126.8 {I2}, I|g=16.2 {I13}, Ice(K)=0.016 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1126.56 {I12}, I|g=5.6 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.23 24 $ EKC=0.0010 3
167YBS G KC=0.00451 18$LC=0.000648 24$MC=0.000144 5
167YBS G NC=3.38E-5 12$OC=4.86E-6 18$PC=2.66E-7 11$IPC=8.40E-7 19
167YB cG $|DJ=2 ruled out by |g(|q) which implies unrealistic 4.4% M3 admixture
167YB2cG for |DJ=2, E2+M3 (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp inconsistent with |D|p
167YB G 1305.46 12 20.6 16(M1+E2) 0.0030 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.90 11
167YB cG $E|g=1305.4 {I2}, I|g=20.6 {I16}, Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1305.48 {I12}, I|g=7.4 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.36 15 $ EKC=0.00058 20
167YBS G KC=0.0025 7$LC=0.00036 9$MC=8.1E-5 20
167YBS G NC=1.9E-5 5$OC=2.7E-6 7$PC=1.4E-7 4$IPC=2.20E-5 26
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.38 {I+12-9} or +6.4 {I+81-25} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08);
167YB2cG magnitude of |d favors |D|p=no. E1 from |a(K)exp inconsistent with
167YB3cG level scheme.
167YB L 1356.32 8 (9/2+,11/2+)
167YB cL J$7/2-,9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08
167YB E 0.0045 25 0.8 4 7.24 22 0.8 4
167YBS E EAV=321 18$CK=0.8216 13$CL=0.13105 36$CM+=0.04179 16
167YB G 784.82 10 20.0 10(E1) 2.38E-3 3
167YBS G KC=0.002017 28$LC=0.000280 4$MC=6.20E-5 9
167YBS G NC=1.449E-5 20$OC=2.057E-6 29$PC=1.081E-7 15
167YB2 G %IG=0.87 9
167YB cG $E|g=784.8 {I2}, I|g=20 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.047 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=784.82 {I10}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06, unplaced)
167YB cG |a(K)exp=0.0024 {I5} implies mult=E1 and, hence, |p=+ for
167YB2cG 1356 level. However, |p=- is favored by nuclear orientation for
167YB3cG doubly-placed 595|g from 1951 level assuming it has |p=-.
167YB G 936.0 6 2.3 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 5
167YB G 1054.3 5 1.0 5 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.043 22
167YB G 1175.5 10 6.5 18 x
167YBL G FL=178.863
167YB2 G %IG=0.28 8
167YB G 1323.2 5 1.9 6 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.08 3
167YB L 1947.48 6 (9/2)+
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 as for 7/2, |d(O/Q)>0.19 for 1376|g; and
167YB2cL for 11/2, |d(O/Q)>0.30 for 1507|g, both from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 7.7 7 5.86 6 7.7 7
167YBS E CK=0.8212 9$CL=0.1354 5$CM+=0.04340 23
167YB G 642.11 15 7.0 8(E1(+M2)) 0.0041 6 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 5
167YB cG $E|g=642.2 {I2}, I|g=7.5 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.13 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=642.06 {I15}, I|g=2.5 {I3}, scaled to 7.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G A2=-0.55 34 $ EKC=0.019 4
167YBS G KC=0.0035 5$LC=0.00050 8$MC=0.000112 18
167YBS G NC=2.6E-5 4$OC=3.7E-6 6$PC=1.92E-7 32
167YB cG MR$+0.3|<|d(Q/D)|<+9.4 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); M1(+E2) from |a(K)exp
167YB2cG for doubly-placed line, but level scheme requires |D|p=yes
167YB G 925.29 30 2.3 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 3
167YB cG $E|g=925.4 {I3}, I|g=1.8 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=925.15 {I35}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, scaled to 2.8 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$weighted average of the two values
167YB G 1227.31 20 37.5 20E1+M2 +0.39 +11-9 0.0023 6 g
167YBL G FL=719.61
167YB2 G %IG=1.63 17
167YB cG $E|g=1227.4 {I2}, I|g=37.5 {I20}, Ice(K)=0.020 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1227.22 {I20}, I|g=13.0 {I13} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.38 14 $ EKC=0.00053 14
167YBS G KC=0.0019 5$LC=2.8E-4 8$MC=6.2E-5 19
167YBS G NC=1.5E-5 4$OC=2.1E-6 6$PC=1.13E-7 34$IPC=2.82E-5 21
167YB cG $|d(Q/D) (1981Kr08) favors |D|p=no; but E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1375.99 12 19.1 11(E1+M2) -1.2 8 0.0050 31 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.83 9
167YB cG $E|g=1376.1 {I2}, I|g=19.1 {I11}, Ice(K)|?0.010 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1375.95 {I12}, I|g=7.0 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.53 16 $ EKC AP 0.00052
167YBS G KC=0.0041 26$LC=6.E-4 4$MC=1.4E-4 9
167YBS G NC=3.3E-5 21$OC=4.7E-6 30$PC=2.5E-7 16$IPC=5.E-5 4
167YB cG MR$-2.0|<|d|<-0.4 from |g(|q), rules out |DJ=1, dipole transition
167YB2cG (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d favors |D|p=no; E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1394.07 17 15.5 11E1(+M2) +0.5 6 0.0023 23 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.67 8
167YB cG $E|g=1394.1 {I2}, I|g=15.5 {I11}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1394.04 {I17}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.55 19 $ EKC LE 0.0010
167YBS G KC=0.0018 19$LC=2.7E-4 30$MC=6.E-5 7
167YBS G NC=1.4E-5 16$OC=2.0E-6 22$PC=1.1E-7 12$IPC=1.0E-4 4
167YB cG MR$-0.1|<|d|<+1.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1469.98 20 9.9 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.43 5
167YB cG $E|g=1470.0 {I2}, I|g=9.9 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1469.89 {I43}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.0016 $ EKC LE 0.0037
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06.
167YB G 1506.84 8 78 5E1+M2 +0.18 7 0.0010915 g
167YB2 G %IG=3.4 4
167YB cG $E|g=1506.9 {I2}, I|g=78.3 {I45}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1506.83 {I8}, I|g=27.0 {I20} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.04 12$ EKC=0.00051 13
167YBS G KC=0.00076 13$LC=0.000105 19$MC=2.3E-5 4
167YBS G NC=5.4E-6 10$OC=7.8E-7 14$PC=4.2E-8 8$IPC=0.000193 5
167YB cG M,MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.18 {I7} or |>12.8 (magnitude of |d) from |g(|q)
167YB2cG (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1629.7 5 10.0 14 D(+Q) -2.4 23 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.43 7
167YB cG $E|g=1629.7 {I5}, I|g=10.0 {I14}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1629.70 {I70}, I|g=1.7 {I3}, scaled to 4.8 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+1.03 64 $ EKC LE 0.0012 $ EKC LE 0.0025
167YB cG MR$-4.6|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). First |a(K) exp
167YB2cG from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB L 1951.10 6 (9/2)
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 7.0 7 5.90 6 7.0 7
167YBS E CK=0.8212 9$CL=0.1354 5$CM+=0.04341 23
167YB G 594.51 17 8.5 15 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 7
167YB cG MR$-12.6|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.1 if 9/2 to 7/2; or -|@|<|d|<-0.8 if 9/2 to 9/2
167YB2cG (1981Kr08).
167YB cG $This placement affirmed by |g|g-coin (1975VyZY).
167YB G 1379.5 2 18.9 11 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.82 9
167YB cG $Ice(K)=0.025 (1975VyZY)
167YB2 G EKC=0.0013
167YB cG M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1397.60 10 30.0 16 Q(+D)
167YB2 G %IG=1.30 14
167YB cG $E|g=1397.7 {I2}, I|g=30.0 {I16}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1397.57 {I10}, I|g=10.5 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.33 21 $ EKC LE 0.0050
167YB cG MR$-9.8|<|d(Q/D)|<-0.8 or |>4.6 (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d favors
167YB2cG |D|p=no. However, E1 is favored from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1474.3 7 4.5 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 4
167YB G 1510.39 15 21.5 24 D+Q +0.3 GE
167YB2 G %IG=0.93 13
167YB cG $E|g=1510.4 {I5}, I|g=21.5 {I24}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1510.39 {I15}, I|g=7.4 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.48 20 $ EKC=0.00060 20
167YB cG MR$+0.47 {I+22-14} or +3.6 {I+15-33} (1981Kr08); |d favors |D|p=no.
167YB2cG However, E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1531.63 27 9.1 23
167YB2 G %IG=0.40 11
167YB cG $E|g=1531.7 {I3}, I|g=9.1 {I23} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1531.58 {I27}, I|g=3.5 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1633.69 15 36 3 D(+Q) g
167YB2 G %IG=1.56 19
167YB cG $E|g=1633.9 {I3}, I|g=35.5 {I32}, Ice(K)=0.015 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1633.64 {I15}, I|g=10.5 {I10}, scaled to 29.4 {I28} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.22 22 $ EKC=0.00042 15 $ EKC=0.00057 20
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB cG MR$+0.04 {I12} or +7.9 {I+39-872} (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1824.8 4 2.1 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 3
167YB cG $E|g=1824.8 {I4}, I|g=2.1 {I7} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1824.74 {I80}, I|g=0.7 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1917.60 20 18.9 15 D(+Q) -0.18 +18-16 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.82 10
167YB cG $E|g=1917.4 {I2}, I|g=18.9 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1917.79 {I20}, I|g=5.9 {I9} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.03 30
167YB G 1951.48 20 15.0 12
167YB2 G %IG=0.65 8
167YB cG $E|g=1951.6 {I2}, I|g=15.0 {I12}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1951.36 {I20}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.37 80 $ EKC=0.0007 3
167YB cG MR$-0.6|<|d(O/Q)|<+6.6 (1981Kr08). E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp=0.0007 {I3}
167YB L 1952.66 6 (7/2)+
167YB cL J$7/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 6.3 8 5.95 7 6.3 8
167YBS E CK=0.8212 9$CL=0.1354 6$CM+=0.04341 23
167YB G 597.4 6 4 3 [M1,E2] 0.019 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.17 13
167YBS G KC=0.016 6$LC=0.0025 7$MC=5.6E-4 16
167YBS G NC=1.3E-4 4$OC=1.8E-5 6$PC=9.E-7 4
167YB G 1164.20 20 10.2 10E1(+M2) 0.4 LE 0.0019 7
167YB2 G %IG=0.44 6
167YB cG $E|g=1164.3 {I3}, I|g=10.2 {I10}, Ice(K)|<0.02 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1164.16 {I20}, I|g=3.1 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+1.02 75 $EKC LE 0.0020
167YBS G KC=0.0016 6$LC=2.3E-4 10$MC=5.1E-5 22
167YBS G NC=1.2E-5 5$OC=1.7E-6 7$PC=9.E-8 4$IPC=9.5E-6 7
167YB cG MR$-0.1|<|d|<+48.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), with 7/2 to 7/2 transition
167YB2cG ruled out; |<0.4 from |a(K)exp.
167YB G 1275.38 20 18.8 15E1(+M2) 0.1 LE 0.00106 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.82 10
167YB cG $E|g=1275.4 {I2}, I|g=18.8 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.012 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1275.35 {I30}, I|g=6.0 {I9} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.47 16 $ EKC=0.00064 22
167YBS G KC=0.00086 4$LC=0.000117 6$MC=2.59E-5 13
167YBS G NC=6.05E-6 30$OC=8.7E-7 4$PC=4.67E-8 23$IPC=5.31E-5 8
167YB cG MR$-0.2|<|d|<+1.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), while excluding 7/2 to 5/2
167YB2cG or 3/2; |<0.1 from |a(K)exp
167YB cG $An alternative 7/2- to 5/2+ placement from the 1306 level is
167YB2cG rejected by 1981Kr08 because, for that, |d=0.47 {I+4-2}.
167YB G 1541.94 15 19.0 15 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.83 10
167YB cG $E|g=1541.9 {I2}, I|g=19.0 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1541.96 {I15}, I|g=6.1 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.13 32 $ EKC=0.00053 16
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.34 {I+37-44} from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); E1 from |a(K)exp for
167YB2cG doubly-placed |g.
167YB G 1644.49 11 45 3E1
167YB2 G %IG=1.96 22
167YB cG $E|g=1644.3 {I3}, I|g=45.4 {I28}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1644.51 {I11}, I|g=13.6 {I13}, scaled to 38.1 {I37} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.24 18 $ EKC=0.00040 11
167YBS G CC=0.000925 13$KC=0.000534 7$LC=7.18E-5 10$MC=1.582E-5 22
167YBS G NC=3.71E-6 5$OC=5.31E-7 7$PC=2.90E-8 4$IPC=0.000299 4
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.23 {I20} (1981Kr08), ruling out |DJ=1, dipole.
167YB2cG |a(K)exp consistent with E1
167YB G 1675.6 4 14.0 12(E1)
167YBL G FL=278.210
167YB2 G %IG=0.61 8
167YB cG $E|g=1675.8 {I4}, I|g=14.0 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1675.35 {I40}, I|g=3.3 {I6}, scaled to 9.2 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.00077 $ EKC LE 0.0013
167YBS G CC=0.000928 13$KC=0.000518 7$LC=6.95E-5 10$MC=1.532E-5 21
167YBS G NC=3.59E-6 5$OC=5.15E-7 7$PC=2.81E-8 4$IPC=0.000322 5
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB G 1713.62 15 24.6 12E1
167YB2 G %IG=1.07 11
167YB cG $E|g=1713.6 {I3}, I|g=24.6 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1713.62 {I15}, I|g=7.2 {I9} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.00043
167YBS G CC=0.000934 13$KC=0.000499 7$LC=6.69E-5 9$MC=1.475E-5 21
167YBS G NC=3.46E-6 5$OC=4.96E-7 7$PC=2.71E-8 4$IPC=0.000350 5
167YB G 1873.02 20 10.5 8(E1)
167YBF G FL=78.679
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 5
167YB cG $E|g=1873.0 {I2}, I|g=10.5 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.007 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1873.15 {I46}, I|g=2.3 {I4}, scaled to 6.4 {I11} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.73 35 $ EKC LE 0.00072 $ EKC LE 0.0013
167YBS G CC=0.000973 14$KC=0.000431 6$LC=5.77E-5 8$MC=1.271E-5 18
167YBS G NC=2.98E-6 4$OC=4.27E-7 6$PC=2.341E-8 33$IPC=0.000468 7
167YB cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=|?4:0.34:4.56:4.7:0.09:1.37:1.48 (1971Ab04)
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB cG MR$-0.1|<|d(Q/D)|<+1.3 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB cG E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1873.97
167YB G 1893.30 20 8.4 28
167YBF G FL=58.539
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 13
167YB cG E,RI$from 1976Me06. 1894.4|g in 1975VyZY with I|g=35.7 {I14} and
167YB2cG Ice(K)|?0.01 is most likely a doublet corresponding
167YB3cG to 1893.30|g and 1895.38|g in 1976Me06
167YB cG $I|g=3.0 {I10}, scaled to 8.4 {I28} (1976Me06).
167YB cG E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1894.11
167YB L 1973.96 9 5/2,7/2
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$5/2-,7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 3.7 10 6.16 12 3.7 10
167YBS E CK=0.8209 9$CL=0.1356 6$CM+=0.04350 23
167YB G 1554.70 35 5.2 12 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 6
167YB cG $E|g=1555.3 {I6}, I|g=5.2 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1554.50 {I35}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.53 49 $ A2=-0.49 45
167YB cG MR$-4.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.2 for first A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 or
167YB2cG -2.5|<|d(O/Q)|<+0.1 for second A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2 (1981Kr08);
167YB3cG doubly-placed line.
167YB G 1562.89 47 4.3 11
167YB2 G %IG=0.19 5
167YB cG $E|g=1563.2 {I6}, I|g=4.3 {I11} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1562.70 {I47}, I|g=1.7 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1656.22 24 10.8 15
167YB2 G %IG=0.47 8
167YB cG $E|g=1656.1 {I4}, I|g=10.8 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1656.26 {I24}, I|g=3.7 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1665.48 20 20.9 14 D(+Q) g
167YB2 G %IG=0.91 10
167YB cG $E|g=1665.2 {I3}, I|g=20.9 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1665.60 {I20}, I|g=4.5 {I7}, scaled to 12.6 {I20} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.12 26 $ A2=+0.13 28$ EKC=0.00048 15 $ EKC=0.0009 3
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.01 {I+26-20} for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2;
167YB2cG |d(Q/D)=+0.7 {I+4-12} for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08);
167YB3cG E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1696.29 39 8.4 14 D(+Q)
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 7
167YB cG $E|g=1697.1 {I7}, I|g=7.6 {I28} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1696.10 {I34}, I|g=3.0 {I5}, scaled to 8.4 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB cG E$alternative placements from 2013 level (in 1976Me06) and from
167YB2cG 1998 level (in 1976Gr06) are ruled out by |g|g-coin and |g(|q) data
167YB3cG in 1981Kr08; consequently, all I(1696|g) is assigned from 1974 level
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G A2=-0.35 27 $ A2=-0.38 29
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.07 {I+51-38} or +1.9 {I+20-11} for first A{-2} if
167YB2cG J(1974)=5/2; |d(Q/D)=+0.40 {I+26-18} or +5.8 {I+119-33} for second
167YB3cG A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1895.38 20 16.8 28 D(+Q) g
167YB2 G %IG=0.73 14
167YB cG E,RI$from 1976Me06. 1894.4|g in 1975VyZY with I|g=35.7 {I14} and
167YB2cG Ice(K)|?0.01 is most likely a doublet corresponding
167YB3cG to 1893.30|g and 1895.38|g in 1976Me06
167YB cG $I|g=6.0 {I10} scaled to 16.8 {I28} (1976Me06).
167YB2 G A2=-0.47 18 $ A2=-0.50 19
167YB cG MR$-1.9|<|d(Q/D)|<+0.4 for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2;
167YB2cG -0.2|<|d(Q/D)|<+1.5 for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2 (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1973.91 14 38.5 17 &
167YB2 G %IG=1.67 17
167YB cG $E|g=1973.8 {I2}, I|g=38.5 {I17}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1973.96 {I14}, I|g=13.4 {I13} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.41 12 $ A2=-0.44 13 $ EKC=0.00026 10 $
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.02 {I13} or +1.7 {I+6-4} for first A{-2} if J(1974)=5/2;
167YB2cG |d(Q/D)=+0.45 {I12} or +4.7 {I+34-15} for second A{-2} if J(1974)=7/2;
167YB3cG doubly-placed line.
167YB L 1975.17 8 (9/2)+
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$9/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 2.3E-7 23 3.9 5 6.14 7 3.9 5
167YBS E EAV=36 22$CK=0.8209 9$CL=0.1356 6$CM+=0.04350 23
167YB G 1255.50 20 8.2 9E1+M2 +0.20 +18-160.0014 8 g
167YBS G KC=0.0011 6$LC=1.59E-4 99$MC=3.5E-5 22
167YBS G NC=8.E-6 5$OC=1.2E-6 8$PC=6.E-8 4$IPC=4.3E-5 4
167YB2 G %IG=0.36 5
167YB cG $E|g=1255.8 {I3}, I|g=8.2 {I9}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1255.37 {I20}, I|g=3.3 {I5} (1976Me06)
167YB cG $Placed by 1981Kr08 from 1974 level also, but E|g does not fit
167YB2cG that placement.
167YB cG $A{-2}=-0.08 {I28}; |a(K)exp |< 0.00135
167YB G 1403.66 14 20.2 12 D(+Q) -0.04 +25-11 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.88 10
167YB cG $E|g=1403.6 {I2}, I|g=20.2 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1403.69 {I14}, I|g=6.0 {I9} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.22 27
167YB G 1534.66 21 13 1 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 7
167YB cG $E|g=1534.8 {I3}, I|g=13 {I1} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1534.59 {I21}, I|g=4.8 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.20 29
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.25 {I+21-18} if 9/2 to 7/2 transition for a doubly-placed
167YB2cG |g (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1554.70 35 5.2 12 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 6
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+43 {I43} for doubly-placed line (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1849.2 4 5.5 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 3
167YB cG $E|g=1849.0 {I4}, I|g=5.5 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1849.63 {I57}, I|g=1.5 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1941.32 13 44.5 32(M1,E2) 0.0015324
167YB2 G %IG=1.93 22
167YB cG $E|g=1941.1 {I2}, I|g=44.5 {I32}, Ice(K)=0.036 {I19} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1941.40 {I12}, I|g=14.7 {I15} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.15 29 $ EKC=0.0008 4
167YBS G KC=0.00106 18$LC=0.000149 25$MC=3.3E-5 6
167YBS G NC=7.8E-6 13$OC=1.11E-6 19$PC=6.1E-8 11$IPC=0.000286 34
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.08 {I16} or |>4.0 (magnitude of |d) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1945.68 50 3.1 6 &
167YBF G FLAG=z
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 3
167YB cG $I|g=1.1 {I2} (1976Me06), scaled to 3.1 {I6}
167YB L 1979.49 8 (7/2-)
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 3.3 4 6.21 7 3.3 4
167YBS E CK=0.8208 9$CL=0.1357 6$CM+=0.04352 23
167YB G 673.89 25 6.7 14[E2] 0.0086812
167YB2 G %IG=0.29 7
167YB cG $E|g=673.9 {I4}, I|g=6.7 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=673.88 {I25}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.006 3
167YBS G KC=0.00704 10$LC=0.001270 18$MC=0.000290 4
167YBS G NC=6.75E-5 9$OC=9.20E-6 13$PC=3.93E-7 6
167YB cG $|a(K)exp consistent with E2(+M1) or E1
167YB G 1548.43 15 18.0 19 D(+Q)
167YB2 G %IG=0.78 11
167YB cG $E|g=1548.4 {I2}, I|g=18.0 {I19}, Ice(K)=0.020 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1548.44 {I15}, I|g=6.8 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.19 35 $ EKC=0.0011 4
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.28 {I44} (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp favors E2 over E1, contrary
167YB2cG to |D|p=(yes) from level scheme.
167YB G 1740.50 27 9.5 17 D+Q +2.5 20 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.41 8
167YB cG $E|g=1740.7 {I3}, I|g=12.9 {I45}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1740.33 {I27}, I|g=3.4 {I6}, scaled to 9.5 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G A2=-1.13 67 $ EKC LE 0.00119 $ EKC LE 0.00128
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06
167YB cG MR$+0.5|<|d|<+4.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08). |a(K)exp based on I|g from
167YB2cG 1976Me06 allows E1 or E2.
167YB G 1801.0 3 2.6 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.11 4
167YB cG $E|g=1800.8 {I3}, I|g=3.5 {I4} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1801.41 {I43}, I|g=1.3 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1920.9 2 7.8 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.34 5
167YB G 1945.68 50 3.1 6 &
167YBF G FLAG=z
167YB2 G %IG=0.14 3
167YB G 1979.55 15 28.3 14(M1+E2) 0.0015023
167YB2 G %IG=1.23 13
167YB cG $E|g=1979.5 {I2}, I|g=28.3 {I14}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1979.58 {I15}, I|g=10.4 {I10} (1976Me06)
167YB cG E,RI$alternative placement from 2013 to 7/2+ 33 level, proposed
167YB2cG by 1976Me06, is ruled out by coincidence and nuclear orientation data
167YB3cG (1981Kr08); hence, all I(1980|g) is assigned to the 1980-level
167YBxcG placement.
167YB2 G A2=-0.62 16 $ EKC=0.00046 18
167YBS G KC=0.00101 17$LC=0.000143 23$MC=3.2E-5 5
167YBS G NC=7.4E-6 12$OC=1.07E-6 18$PC=5.8E-8 11$IPC=0.00031 4
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.60 {I+25-15} or +2.9 {I+16-11} (1981Kr08), favors |D|p=no,
167YB2cG as required by level scheme; however, |a(K)exp favors E1.
167YB L 1995.32 10 (9/2-)
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08, while 7/2 is rejected based on
167YB2cL |d(Q/D)=0.47 {I+5-10} for 1961|g
167YB E 1.7E-8 16 3.0 4 6.23 7 3.0 4
167YBS E EAV=19 27$CK=0.8206 9$CL=0.1359 6$CM+=0.04358 24
167YB G 640 1 2.0 10[E1+M2] 0.0042 6 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.09 5
167YBS G KC=0.0035 5$LC=0.00051 8$MC=0.000113 18
167YBS G NC=2.6E-5 4$OC=3.7E-6 6$PC=1.93E-7 32
167YB cG M$M1(+E2) for the doublet; but level scheme require |D|p=yes
167YB G 1423.65 20 8.1 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.35 4
167YB cG $E|g=1423.7 {I2}, I|g=8.1 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1423.50 {I36}, I|g=2.5 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1554.70 35 5.2 12 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 6
167YB cG MR$+0.2|<|d|<+85.2 from |g(|q) for a doubly-placed line(1981Kr08)
167YB G 1584.9 9 4.2 21 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 9
167YB G 1678.00 70 8.4 14 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.37 7
167YB cG $I|g=3.0 {I5} (1976Me06), scaled to 8.4 {I14}
167YB G 1936.76 20 15.7 22
167YB2 G %IG=0.68 11
167YB cG $E|g=1936.5 {I3}, I|g=17 {I5}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} for 1933.5|g+1936.5|g
167YB2cG (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1936.88 {I20}, I|g=5.6 {I8}, scaled to 15.7 {I22} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB G 1961.42 15 25.5 15 D+Q +0.17 9 g
167YB2 G %IG=1.11 12
167YB cG $E|g=1961.4 {I2}, I|g=25.5 {I15}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1961.43 {I15}, I|g=8.5 {I12} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.02 16 $ EKC=0.00071 24
167YB cG MR$|a(K)exp implies E1,E2.
167YB G 1995.6 7 2.2 10
167YB2 G %IG=0.10 5
167YB cG $E|g=1995.5 {I8}, I|g=2.2 {I10} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1995.69 {I70}, I|g=0.9 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB L 1998.42 6 (9/2)+
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 1.8E-8 18 5.2 6 5.99 6 5.2 6
167YBS E EAV=17 28$CK=0.8205 9$CL=0.1359 6$CM+=0.04359 24
167YB G 642.11 15 7.0 8(M1(+E2)) 0.016 6 &
167YBS G KC=0.013 5$LC=0.0021 6$MC=4.6E-4 13
167YBS G NC=1.08E-4 31$OC=1.5E-5 5$PC=7.6E-7 32
167YB2 G %IG=0.30 5
167YB cG MR$-0.3|<|d|<+9.8 if J(1356)=7/2; -0.3|<|d|<+1.6 if J(1356)=9/2
167YB2cG (1981Kr08); |a(K)exp gives M1(+E2); multiply-placed |g.
167YB G 975.9 3 1.4 3 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.061 14
167YB G 1426.84 12 25.4 10E1+M2 -0.25 +12-15
167YB2 G %IG=1.10 11
167YB cG $E|g=1426.8 {I2}, I|g=25.4 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.015 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1426.82 {I12}, I|g=8.0 {I12} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.19 16 $ EKC=0.00059 20
167YBS G CC=0.00100 6$KC=0.00073 5$LC=0.000100 8$MC=2.20E-5 18
167YBS G NC=5.1E-6 4$OC=7.4E-7 6$PC=4.00E-8 33$IPC=0.0001417 23
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.25 {I+12-15} or -3.0 {I+10-19} (1981Kr08),
167YB2cG |a(K)exp implies E1(+M2); lower |d preferred by evaluators
167YB G 1444.91 27 8.3 12 D(+Q) +0.7 10 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.36 6
167YB cG $E|g=1445.0 {I4}, I|g=8.3 {I12}, Ice(K)|<0.015 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1444.87 {I27}, I|g=2.4 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.50 68 $ EKC<0.0021
167YB cG MR$-0.3|<|d|<+1.7 (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1521.52 23 9.5 14(E1+M2) +0.4 1 0.0016332 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.41 7
167YB cG $E|g=1521.7 {I3}, I|g=12.0 {I34}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1521.41 {I23}, I|g=3.4 {I5}, scaled to 9.5 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB cG RI$from 1976Me06
167YB2 G A2=-0.88 33 $ EKC LE 0.00123
167YBS G KC=0.00122 28$LC=0.00018 4$MC=3.9E-5 9
167YBS G NC=9.1E-6 22$OC=1.31E-6 32$PC=7.1E-8 17$IPC=0.000185 11
167YB cG MR$+0.3|<|d|<+0.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); magnitude of |d in favors
167YB2cG |D|p=no but |a(K)exp and level scheme favor |D|p=yes.
167YB G 1558.10 32 5.2 12
167YB2 G %IG=0.23 6
167YB cG $E|g=1558.1 {I6}, I|g=5.2 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1558.10 {I32}, I|g=2.5 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1578.80 15 13.6 10
167YB2 G %IG=0.59 7
167YB cG $E|g=1578.7 {I2}, I|g=13.6 {I10}, Ice(K)=0.010 {I3} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1578.86 {I15}, I|g=3.9 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC=0.00074 23 $ EKC=0.0010 3
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06; implied
167YB2cG mult=E1 or E2.
167YB G 1588.2 20 1.6 8 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.07 4
167YB G 1680.81 25 20.8 14
167YB2 G %IG=0.90 10
167YB cG $E|g=1680.8 {I3}, I|g=20.8 {I14}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1680.81 {I25}, I|g=4.0 {I6}, scaled to 11.2 {I17} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G EKC LE 0.00089
167YB cG M$E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp
167YB G 1720.1 4 4.7 6
167YB2 G %IG=0.20 3
167YB cG $E|g=1720.2 {I4}, I|g=4.7 {I6} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1719.76 {I70}, I|g=1.0 {I2}, scaled to 2.8 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1758.97 33 10.8 8 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.47 6
167YB cG $E|g=1758.8 {I2}, I|g=10.8 {I8}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1759.59 {I38}, I|g=2.2 {I3}, scaled to 6.2 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.84 40 $ EKC LE 0.00161
167YB cG MR$0.0|<|d=+47.0 (1981Kr08) for doubly-placed |g
167YB G 1819.23 30 6.2 5
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 3
167YB cG $E|g=1819.0 {I3}, I|g=6.2 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1819.50 {I32}, I|g=2.3 {I2} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1964.75 20 12 1 D(+Q) -1.2 14 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.52 6
167YB cG $E|g=1964.7 {I2}, I|g=12 {I1}, Ice(K)=0.013 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1664.81 {I23}, I|g=4.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+1.08 43 (1981Kr08) $ EKC=0.0011 4
167YB cG MR$-2.6|<|d|<+0.2 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08); D or E2 from |a(K) exp
167YB L 2012.32 12 (7/2,9/2-)
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$7/2 or 9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 2.0 4 6.39 10 2.0 4
167YBS E CK=0.8203 9$CL=0.1360 6$CM+=0.04365 24
167YB G 1384.2 3 4.1 7 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 4
167YB G 1534.66 21 13 1 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.57 7
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.32 {I40} or +1.6 {I+24-9} for first A{-2} if J(2012)=9/2;
167YB2cG -0.28 {I+25-35} or -2.6 {I+14-52} if J(2012)=7/2 for second A{-2};
167YB3cG doubly-placed |g (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1582.0 13 6.2 21 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.27 10
167YB G 1833.30 28 10.5 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.46 5
167YB cG $E|g=1833.2 {I3}, I|g=10.5 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1833.38 {I28}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.22 23 $ A2=-0.25 26
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.30 {I+32-29} or +1.5 {I+13-7} for first A{-2} if
167YB2cG J(2012)=9/2; -0.31 {I+22-46} or -2.4 {I+13-26} for second A{-2}
167YB3cG if J(2012)=7/2 (1981Kr08).
167YB G 1933.63 23 15.0 30 (D+Q)
167YB2 G %IG=0.65 14
167YB cG $E|g=1933.5 {I3}, I|g=15.0 {I30}, Ice(K)=0.018 {I6} for
167YB2cG 1933.5|g+1936.5|g (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1933.70 {I23}, I|g=5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.70 38 $ A2=-0.80 44 $ EKC LE 0.0013
167YB cG MR$+0.4|<|d|<+5.9 for first A{-2}, |D|p=(no) if J(2012)=9/2;
167YB2cG -0.09|<|d(Q/D)=+1.33 for second A{-2} if J(2012)=7/2 (1981Kr08).
167YB3cG |DJ|=2 from level scheme.
167YB G 1954.2 6 4.2 6 &
167YBF G FLAG=z
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 3
167YB cG $I|g=1.5 {I2}, scaled to 4.2 {I6} (1976Me06)
167YB L 2013.04 13 (7/2-)
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$7/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 2.3 3 6.33 7 2.3 3
167YBS E CK=0.8203 9$CL=0.1360 6$CM+=0.04365 24
167YB G 991.00 60 2.8 8 z
167YB2 G %IG=0.12 4
167YB cG $I|g=1.0 {I3} (1976Me06), scaled to 2.8 {I8}
167YB G 1954.2 6 4.2 6 &
167YBF G FLAG=z
167YB2 G %IG=0.18 3
167YB G 1983.34 32 7.5 8 D(+Q) -3.3 34 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 5
167YB cG $E|g=1983.2 {I10}, I|g=7.5 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1983.35 {I32}, I|g=2.6 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.78 58
167YB cG MR$-6.8|<|d|<+0.1 (1981Kr08); |DJ=1 transition if |D|p=yes.
167YB G 2013.04 15 39.0 18(M1+E2) 0.0014822
167YB2 G %IG=1.69 17
167YB cG $E|g=2012.9 {I2}, I|g=39.0 {I18} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2013.12 {I15}, I|g=13.4 {I13} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.27 13
167YBS G KC=0.00098 16$LC=0.000138 22$MC=3.1E-5 5
167YBS G NC=7.2E-6 12$OC=1.03E-6 17$PC=5.62E-8 99$IPC=0.00032 4
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.32 {I9} or +9.6 {I+225-42} (1981Kr08); favors |D|p=no.
167YB L 2052.79 11 9/2(-)
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$9/2- assigned in 1981Kr08 from |g(|q,temp) data
167YB E 2.4 9 6.28 17
167YBS E CK=0.8197 10$CL=0.1365 6$CM+=0.04383 27
167YB G 1735.31 25 19.2 13(M1+E2) +2.2 18 0.0016 5 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.83 9
167YB cG $E|g=1735.3 {I3}, I|g=19.2 {I13}, Ice(K)|<0.01 (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1735.31{I25}, I|g=4.6 {I7}, scaled to 12.9 {I20} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.88 44 $ EKC LE 0.00052 $ EKC LE 0.00078
167YBS G KC=0.0012 4$LC=1.7E-4 5$MC=3.7E-5 11
167YBS G NC=8.7E-6 27$OC=1.2E-6 4$PC=6.6E-8 23$IPC=0.000168 30
167YB cG $First |a(K)exp from I|g in 1975VyZY, second in 1976Me06, favoring E1
167YB2cG in the first case and E2 in the second, but |D|p=(no) from level scheme
167YB cG MR$+0.4|<|d|<+4.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1752.7 3 5.4 15
167YBF G FL=301.48
167YB2 G %IG=0.24 7
167YB cG $E|g=1752.8 {I3}, I|g=5.4 {I15} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1752.30 {I70}, I|g=0.8 {I2}, scaled to 2.2 {I6} (1976Me06).
167YB cG E$poor fit in the decay scheme, with level-energy difference=1751.3
167YB G 1926.5 3 9.7 9 D(+Q) -2.2 21 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.42 6
167YB cG $E|g=1926.2 {I2}, I|g=9.7 {I9} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1926.76 {I18}, I|g=2.9 {I4} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.06 53
167YB cG MR$-4.4|<|d|<-0.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1973.91 14 38.5 17 &
167YB2 G %IG=1.67 17
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+0.40 {I8} or +4.7 {I+24-14} (1981Kr08) for a doubly-placed
167YB2cG |g; |a(K)exp giving E1 is inconsistent with this placement.
167YB G 2052.1 6 1.6 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.070 11
167YB L 2330.38 7 9/2+
167YB cL $Level from 1976Me06 and 1977Gr21
167YB cL J$9/2+ assigned in 1981Kr08, while 2204|g(|q) and 2272|g(|q) do not
167YB2cL permit 7/2
167YB E 4.0 6 5.76 9
167YBS E CK=0.8132 17$CL=0.1411 12$CM+=0.04561 42
167YB G 1541.94 15 19.0 15 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.83 10
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=-0.42 {I+36-44} from |g(|q) for doubly-placed line (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1701.8 4 5.1 8 D+Q +4.9 46 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.22 4
167YB cG $E|g=1701.8 {I4}, I|g=5.1 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1701.80 {I50}, I|g=1.5 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.54 33
167YB cG $+0.3|<|d|<+9.6 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1758.97 33 10.8 8 &
167YB2 G %IG=0.47 6
167YB cG $|d(Q/D)=+24 {I24} for doubly-placed line (1981Kr08)
167YB G 1889.87 20 14.3 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.62 7
167YB cG $E|g=1889.9 {I2}, I|g=14.3 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1889.79 {I35}, I|g=2.0 {I5}, scaled to 5.6 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.35 41
167YB cG MR$|d(Q/D)=-0.25 {I25} or |>2.1 (1981Kr08).
167YB cG $Designation as M1+E2 transition in 1981Kr08 seems a misprint.
167YB G 1899.68 22 14.3 9
167YB2 G %IG=0.62 7
167YB cG $E|g=1899.5 {I2}, I|g=14.3 {I19} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1899.95 {I25}, I|g=3.0 {I5}, scaled to 8.4 {I14} (1976Me06)
167YB G 1910.78 20 7.7 8
167YB2 G %IG=0.33 5
167YB cG $E|g=1910.8 {I2}, I|g=7.7 {I8} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=1910.76 {I25}, I|g=2.1 {I3} (1976Me06)
167YB G 2151.8 6 0.9 2 x
167YB2 G %IG=0.039 9
167YB G 2204.34 20 7.3 5 D+Q +5.7 55 g
167YB2 G %IG=0.32 4
167YB cG $E|g=2204.3 {I2}, I|g=7.3 {I5} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2204.43 {I30}, I|g=1.8 {I3}, scaled to 5.0 {I8} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=+0.95 54
167YB cG MR$+0.2|<|d|<+11.1 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08)
167YB G 2271.81 20 24.0 12(M1+E2) +0.35 15 0.00149 4 g
167YB2 G %IG=1.04 11
167YB cG $E|g=2271.5 {I5}, I|g=24.0 {I12} (1975VyZY)
167YB cG $E|g=2271.86 {I20}, I|g=7.2 {I7} (1976Me06)
167YB2 G A2=-0.69 19
167YBS G KC=0.000834 21$LC=0.0001171 30$MC=2.60E-5 7
167YBS G NC=6.10E-6 16$OC=8.78E-7 23$PC=4.84E-8 13$IPC=0.000504 12
167YB cG MR$+0.2|<|d|<+0.5 from |g(|q) (1981Kr08), magnitude(|d) favors |D|p=no
167YB G 2296.2 3 2.2 2
167YB2 G %IG=0.096 12