166TA 166W EC DECAY 1989HI04 08NDS 200804 166TA H TYP=FUL$AUT=CORAL M. BAGLIN$CIT=NDS 109, 1103 (2008)$CUT=1-Mar-2008$ 166TA CG GG coin (TA XK)(125.8G, 395.9G). 166TA CG M(A) From intensity balance assuming no EC+B+ feeding 166TA2CG to 298.3 level 166TA CL J From Adopted Levels. 166W P 0.0 0+ 19.2 S 6 4206 30 166TA N 0.329 26 0.99965 12 1.00035 166TA CN NR The basis of the intensity normalization is that negligible 166TA2CN EC+B+ feeding to the ground state is expected (DJ=(2), DPI=NO), so 166TA3CN SUMOF (TI TO GS)=100. 166TA PN 1.0 3 166TA L 0 (2)+ 166TA L 125.79 18 1+ 166TA E 36 4 54 7 4.02 6 90 11 166TAS E EAV=1382 14$CK=0.493 6$CL=0.0796 10$CM+=0.0245 3 166TA G 125.8 2 100 M1+E2 0.8 +8-5 1.98 24 166TAS G KC=1.4 5$LC=0.47 15$MC=0.11 4$NC+=0.031 10 166TAS G NC=0.027 9$OC=0.0038 11$PC=0.00012 5 166TA CG M,MR from EKC=1.4 4. 166TA L 298.3 3 166TA E 0.3 LT 0.4 LT 6.1 GT 0.7 LT ? 166TAS E EAV=1304 14$CK=0.527 6$CL=0.0851 10$CM+=0.0262 3 166TA G 172.5 3 5.8 7 [M1,E2] 0.71 22 AC 166TAS G KC=0.5 3$LC=0.15 4$MC=0.037 10$NC+=0.0099 23 166TAS G NC=0.0086 21$OC=0.00124 21$PC=4.E-5 3 166TA DG CC(E1)=0.0889, CC(M1)=0.926, CC(E2)=0.493. 166TA L 350.34 25 166TA CL E relative order of the 45.8 and 224.6 transitions 166TA2CL is not established. The reverse order would define a level 166TA3CL at 171.6. 166TA E 0.3 LT 0.5 LT 6.0 GT 0.8 LT ? 166TAS E EAV=1280 14$CK=0.537 6$CL=0.0868 10$CM+=0.0267 3 166TA G 224.6 2 7.8 5 [M1,E2] 0.32 13 C 166TAS G KC=0.25 13$LC=0.0595 20$MC=0.0141 11$NC+=0.00384 20 166TAS G NC=0.00333 22$OC=0.000491 9$PC=2.2E-5 13 166TA DG CC(E1)=0.0453, CC(M1)=0.445, CC(E2)=0.203. 166TA L 395.93 20 1+ 166TA CL J LOGFT<5.9 FROM 0+ INDEPENDENT OF MULTIPOLARITIES ASSUMED 166TA2CL FOR TRANSITIONS DEEXCITING THE 396 LEVEL. 166TA E 3.4 5 6.6 10 4.87 7 10.0 15 166TAS E EAV=1259 14$CK=0.546 6$CL=0.0883 10$CM+=0.0271 3 166TA G 45.8 4 1.4 4 [M1] 7.21 22 C 166TAS G LC=5.59 17$MC=1.27 4$NC+=0.355 11 166TAS G NC=0.303 9$OC=0.0480 15$PC=0.00331 10 166TA DG CC(E1)=0.576, CC(M1)=7.21, CC(E2)=118. 166TA CG M IF PLACEMENT OF 46G IS CORRECT, E2 IS RULED OUT BECAUSE IT 166TA2CG WOULD IMPLY NEGATIVE EC+B+ FEEDING OF THE 350 LEVEL; 166TA2CG M1 WOULD IMPLY NO EC+B+ BRANCH TO 350 LEVEL. 166TA G 97.7 4 1.9 2 [M1,E2] 4.4 4 AC 166TAS G KC=2.4 15$LC=1.5 9$MC=0.37 23$NC+=0.10 6 166TAS G NC=0.09 6$OC=0.012 7$PC=0.00022 15 166TA DG CC(E1)=0.390, CC(M1)=4.66, CC(E2)=4.07. 166TA CG E 97.7 from FIG. 3 OF 1989HI04, CONSISTENT WITH E(level) 166TA2CG difference. EG=97.1 from table 4 APPEARS TO BE A misprint. 166TA G 270.1 2 2.3 2 [M1,E2] 0.19 8 C 166TAS G KC=0.15 8$LC=0.032 3$MC=0.0075 4$NC+=0.00207 13 166TAS G NC=0.00179 10$OC=0.00027 3$PC=1.3E-5 8 166TA G 395.9 3 5.4 14[M1,E2] 0.07 3 166TAS G KC=0.05 3$LC=0.0099 25$MC=0.0023 5$NC+=0.00063 15 166TAS G NC=0.00054 13$OC=8.3E-5 23$PC=5.E-6 3 166TA CG COINCIDENT WITH XK(Ta) ONLY.