165ER 165TM EC DECAY (30.06 H) 1982VY03,1980AB18 24NDS 202401
165ER H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 194, 460 (2024)$
165ER2 H CUT=31-Oct-2022$
165ER DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
165ER DE EAV,LOGFT$FROM BetaShape v2.3.1 (Dec-2023) 2023MO21.
165ER c 1982Vy03: measured E|g, I|g, E|b, I|b, (ce)(|g) coin. The |g radiation
165ER2c measured by Ge(Li), conversion electrons by Si(Li) and |b
165ER3c spectra by iron-free toroidal magnetic spectrometer.
165ER c 1980Ab18 (also 1970Ab18 and analysis in 1980Ab22): measured E|g, I|g,
165ER2c ce. Conversion electrons measured by a magnetic spectrometer
165ER c 1983Mo10: analyzed I|g, ce, |g|g(|q) data.
165ER2c Analysis of E|g, I|g, mult, |d for |g rays from doublet of levels at
165ER3c 589.760 (3/2+) and 589.869 (1/2-)
165ER c 1988Ul02: Measured |g|g(|q) using Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) detectors
165ER2c for |g|g-coincidences
165ER c Others:
165ER c |g: 1987BaZB, 1976Gu02, 1973St22, 1972Ma40 (also 1971Ma74), 1968Ku14,
165ER2c 1968Ku02, 1967Co26, 1967Co20, 1966Bo07, 1963Gr15, 1963Ra15, 1961Ka30,
165ER3c 1961Bj02, 1960Gr27, 1959Kh32, 1957Go78, 1953Ha43
165ER c ce: 1991GaZZ, 1987BaZB, 1974An04, 1972Ma40 (also 1971Ma74), 1968Ku14,
165ER2c 1967Co26, 1964Ch22, 1963Gr15, 1962Ha24, 1961Ka30, 1961Bj02, 1960Gr27,
165ER3c 1959Bo57, 1957Gr74
165ER c |g|g: 1972Ma40 (also 1971Ma74), 1968Ku14, 1968Ku02, 1967Dz07, 1963Gr15,
165ER2c 1963Dz06, 1958An39
165ER c (ce)(|g) coin: 1968Ku14, 1968Ku02
165ER c (ce)(ce) coin: 1967Dz07
165ER c (ce)|g(t): 1974An04, 1972Af03, 1970Ba71, 1968Ad05. The last three
165ER2c references and 1974An04 have some common authors.
165ER c |g|g(|q): 1975Fu13, 1978EgZY
165ER c |b: 1965Pr02
165ER c {+165}Tm isotope T{-1/2}: 1970Ka23, 1967Co20, 1964Ch22, 1963Ra15,
165ER2c 1961Bj02, 1957Gr74, 1954Mi01, 1953Ha43
165ER d 1954Mi16 is the same as 1954Mi01
165ER cE $Measured E|b{++}=329.25 (2.1|*10{+-3} {I2})%, 272 {I2} (5.6|*10{+-3}
165ER2cE {I7})% (1982Vy03). Other : E|b{++}=330 {I20} (6.5|*10{+-3} {I20})%
165ERxcE (1965Pr02)
165ER cE $Intensity balance gives apparent |e+|b{++} feeding for the following
165ER2cE low-lying levels, which are not likely due to highly forbidden
165ER3cE |b transitions from 1/2+ parent state: 1.3% {I12} for 47.16, 5/2+
165ER4cE level; 1.8% {I4} for 77.26, 7/2- level; 0.25% {I6} for 97.96, 9/2+
165ER5cE level; and 0.036% {I4} for 175.8, 9/2- level. These imbalance are
165ER6cE probably due to some unresolved issues in the decay scheme, for
165ER7cE example accurate and precise information about multipolarities of
165ER8cE very low-energy transitions, and a few doubly-placed transitions
165ER9cE with undivided intensities.
165ER cG E,RI$From 1982Vy03, except where noted otherwise
165ER cG M,MR$From ce data of 1980Ab18 and 1982Vy03. The data are
165ER2cG normalized to |a(K)(M1)=0.202 {I7} for 242|g. Since |a(K)(M1+E2,|d=0.12
165ER3cG {I+5-7}) for the 242|g is 0.197 {I4}, all the experimental conversion
165ER4cG coefficients have been adjusted downward by 2.5%. Below 390 keV, the
165ER5cG multipolarity assignments and mixing ratios are primarily from
165ER6cG subshell data and conversion coefficients of 1970Ab18 and 1980Ab18,
165ER7cG above this the |a(K)exp data are from 1982Vy03 only. Uncertainties
165ER8cG in experimental electron intensities are stated in 1970Ab18 as |?10%.
165ER9cG Values of K-shell and L-subshell intensities are used from 1980Ab18
165ERAcG when available in both the references: 1980Ab18 and 1970Ab18.
165ERBcG 1988Ul02 report |d(E2/M1) and |d(M2/E1) for 19 |g rays
165ERCcG from |g|g(|q) data, but no A{-2} and A{-4} values are listed in the
165ERDcG paper and sign convention for mixing ratio is not given.
165EREcG Eight of these transitions are assigned M2+E1 multipolarity with
165ERFcG significant values of mixing ratios. Several of these M2+E1 mixing
165ERGcG as given by 1988Ul02 give B(M2)(W.u.) values larger than RUL(M2)=1,
165ERHcG for 264.5|g from 507 level, |d(M2/E1)=-0.33 {I7} (1988Ul02) gives
165ERIcG B(M2)(W.u.)=9, about an order of magnitude larger than RUL. For this
165ERJcG reason the |d values given by 1988Ul02 have not been adopted here
165ERKcG but are listed under comments. For assignment of mult=M1, small E2
165ERLcG admixtures are not ruled out.
165ER cG E(x),RI(x),M(x)$From analysis by 1983Mo10 of earlier ce and
165ER2cG |g|g(|q) data
165ER cG RI(y)$Tentative value deduced by 1980Ab18 from their ce data
165ER2cG assuming multipolarity as stated. The evaluators have normalized
165ER3cG I|g values quoted by 1980Ab18 to I|g(242.9|g)=100
165ER cG E(b)$Observed only in 1982Vy03
165ER cG E(d)$Observed only in ce spectra, for ce(K) see 1980Ab18
165ER cG $Ice(K) values from 1982Vy03 are normalized to Ice(K)=100 for
165ER2cG 242.9|g. For some of the transitions, ce data are available from
165ER3cG 1980Ab18 only. The Ice(K) values from 1980Ab18 are
165ER4cG also normalized to Ice(K)=100 for 242.9|g
165ER cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data, with uncertainties adjusted
165ER2cL upwards, as specified in comments, for 23 E|g values out of a total
165ER3cL of 151 |g rays placed in the decay scheme. With this adjustment
165ER4cL reduced |h{+2}=2.0 as compared to |h{+2}=1.3 at 95% confidence level,
165ER5cL and only ten |g rays deviating between 2|s and 3|s.
165ER6cL Without this adjustment reduced |h{+2}=18, much too large, with
165ER7cL 14 |g rays deviating by more than 5|s, three |g rays deviating between
165ER8cL 4|s and 5|s, and ten |g rays between 3|s and 4|s.
165ER cL J$From the Adopted Levels
165ER cL T$From (|g)(ce)(t) (1974An04, also 1972Af03), unless otherwise noted.
165ER2cL The same values are adopted in Adopted Levels
165TM P 0.0 1/2+ 30.06 H 3 1591.3 15
165TM cP J,T$From {+165}Tm Adopted Levels
165TM cP QP$From 2021Wa16
165ER N 0.355 15 0.355 15 1.0 1.0
165ER cN NR$From I|g/I(K| x ray) (1982Vy03).
165ER2cN I(K{-|a2})=77.4 {I18}, I(K{-|a1})=133 {I3}, I(K{-|b1})=43.3 {I10},
165ER3cN I(K{-|b2})=10.7 {I3} relative to I|g=100 for 242.9|g (1982Vy03)
165ER PN 3
165ER G 125.17 4 0.04 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G %IG=0.014
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.14 {I3} (1980Ab18)
165ER cG E$placed from a 1044 level in 1980Ab18
165ER G 144.08 4 d
165ER G 197.70 4 d
165ER G 222.0 7 d
165ER G 253.45 50.18 4E1 0.0283 4
165ER2 G EKC=0.023 4 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.02382 33$LC=0.00347 5$MC=0.000767 11
165ERS G NC=0.0001771 25$OC=2.475E-5 35$PC=1.211E-6 17
165ER2 G %IG=0.064 15
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.020 {I4} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 275.7 0.6
165ER2 G %IG=0.21
165ER cG E$observed only in 1970Ab18; I|g is from Ice(K)
165ER G 277.655 330.109 5M1 0.1642 23
165ER2 G EKC=0.15 3 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.1381 19$LC=0.02034 28$MC=0.00451 6
165ERS G NC=0.001051 15$OC=0.0001521 21$PC=8.44E-6 12
165ER2 G %IG=0.0387 24
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.082 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 282.40 15 d
165ER G 304.0 2 d
165ER G 323.4 2 d
165ER G 377.4 2 d
165ER G 480.23 8 0.136 10
165ER2 G %IG=0.048 4
165ER G 525.65 4 0.296 21 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.105 9
165ER G 654.54 8 0.068 8 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0241 30
165ER G 660.62 21 0.050 13 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.018 5
165ER G 712.59 6 0.066 11 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.023 4
165ER G 716.96 5 0.087 8M1 0.0140020 b
165ER2 G EKC=0.0092 13
165ERS G KC=0.01184 17$LC=0.001690 24$MC=0.000373 5
165ERS G NC=8.70E-5 12$OC=1.264E-5 18$PC=7.11E-7 10
165ER2 G %IG=0.0309 31
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0055 {I5}
165ER G 742.84 6 0.080 10M1 0.0128218 b
165ER2 G EKC=0.0078 23
165ERS G KC=0.01084 15$LC=0.001546 22$MC=0.000341 5
165ERS G NC=7.95E-5 11$OC=1.156E-5 16$PC=6.50E-7 9
165ER2 G %IG=0.028 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0043 {I11}
165ER G 773.42 18 0.050 10 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.018 4
165ER G 793.72 10 0.082 10 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.029 4
165ER G 826.04 6 0.130 8 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0462 35
165ER G 880.93 7 0.089 7 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0316 28
165ER G 884.48 21 0.035 7 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0124 26
165ER G 988.75 28 0.023 6 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0082 22
165ER G 1013.59 18 0.018 5 b
165ER2 G %IG=0.0064 18
165ER G 1118.77 13 0.023 4 (M1) 0.00470 7 b
165ER2 G EKC=0.006 4
165ERS G KC=0.00398 6$LC=0.000560 8$MC=0.0001234 17
165ERS G NC=2.88E-5 4$OC=4.18E-6 6$PC=2.371E-7 33$IPC=6.43E-7 10
165ER2 G %IG=0.0082 15
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0009 {I4}
165ER L 0.0 5/2-
165ER E 0.001580 2.9984 9.0 3 LT 1U?
165ERS E EAV=284.8 7$CK=0.81866 28$CL=0.13689 11$CM+=0.04392 11
165ER cE TI$-2 {I5} from |g-transition intensity balance
165ER L 47.158 4 5/2+ 4.0 NS 1
165ER cL T$others: 3.25 ns {I20} (1964Ja09) from |g(ce)(t)
165ER G 47.155 6 47.5 12 E1 0.450 6 C
165ER2 G %IG=16.9 8
165ER cG M$E1 in 1982Vy03
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=46 {I4}:18.3 {I13}:26.9 {I16} (1980Ab18).
165ER2 G L1:L2:L3=100:33:67 (1970Ab18) $ M1:M2:M3=100:33:67 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G NC=0.01767 25$OC=0.002213 31$PC=7.48E-5 10
165ERS G LC=0.351 5$MC=0.0784 11
165ER cG MR$<0.024 from L1:L2:L3 (1980Ab18). Other: |d=-0.14 {I+5-6} (|g|g(|q))
165ER2cG (1988Ul02). However RUL=1 for B(M2)(W.u.) does not permit any M2
165ER3cG admixture, thus pure E1 is assigned
165ER L 62.672 4 7/2+
165ER G 15.512 10 0.008 4 M1+E2 0.27 7 1.2E+3 6 9.4 3 yC
165ER2 G %IG=0.0028 14
165ERS G L/T=0.77 25$M/T=0.18 11
165ERS G N/T=0.041 27$O/T=0.0048 32$P/T=2.8E-5 14
165ERS G LC=10E+2 5$MC=2.3E+2 11
165ERS G NC=51 25$OC=6.0 28$PC=0.0351 5
165ER cG TI$from |g-transition intensity balance.
165ER cG RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a(total). Other: |?0.05 (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=0.49 {I16}:2.5 {I5}:2.9 {I6} (1980Ab18)
165ER CG $M1:M2:M3=LT 37.5:60:100 (1970Ab18)
165ER G 62.676 5 1.44 3E1 1.099 15
165ERS G KC=0.896 13$LC=0.1587 22$MC=0.0353 5
165ERS G NC=0.00801 11$OC=0.001033 14$PC=3.81E-5 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.511 24
165ER cG $Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.62 {I8}:0.23 {I3} (1980Ab18)
165ER L 77.258 4 7/2- 0.96 NS 8
165ER cL T$weighted average of 0.90 ns {I9} (1974An04) and 1.10 ns {I13}
165ER2cL (1970Ba71)
165ER G 14.56 2 0.26 (E1) 11.47 17 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G LC=8.91 13$MC=2.068 30
165ERS G NC=0.447 6$OC=0.0448 6$PC=0.000961 14
165ER2 G %IG=0.092
165ER cG $Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=0.25 {I12}:0.25 {I12}:0.33 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 30.106 8 0.25 E1 1.565 22 y
165ER2 G L1:L2:L3=100:58:116 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G LC=1.222 17$MC=0.275 4
165ERS G NC=0.0612 9$OC=0.00721 10$PC=0.0002076 29
165ER2 G %IG=0.089
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.57 {I8}:0.30 {I5}:0.66 {I8} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 77.253 5 2.05 5M1+E2 2.3 4 7.70 16 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.73 4
165ER cG M$(E2) in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=1.8 3 $ EL3C=2.27 22 (1991GaZZ)$
165ER2 G K:L1:L2:L3=833:100:813:625 (1970Ab18)$ M1:M2:M3=100:909:699 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=2.30 19$LC=4.14 24$MC=1.01 6
165ERS G NC=0.227 13$OC=0.0266 15$PC=0.000117 13
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=25.5 {I25}:2.9 {I3}:23.0 {I22}:17.8
165ER2cG {I17} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=18.2 {I19} Penetration parameter is deduced
165ER3cG as |?0 (1991GaZZ) from |a(L3)exp
165ER cG MR$from subshell ratios. Others: -23.4 to +25.8 (|g|g(|q))
165ER2cG (1988Ul02); 6 +|@-3 (1991GaZZ) from |a(L3)exp
165ER L 97.958 9 9/2+
165ER G 20.71 2 0.08 (E1) 4.39 6 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G LC=3.42 5$MC=0.779 11
165ERS G NC=0.1711 24$OC=0.01876 27$PC=0.000466 7
165ER2 G %IG=0.028
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.66 {I16}:0.41 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 35.280 18 0.06 M1+E2 0.173 +26-1917.5 25 y
165ERS G LC=13.6 19$MC=3.1 5
165ERS G NC=0.72 10$OC=0.094 12$PC=0.00301 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.021
165ER CG $L1:L2:L3=100:33:67; M1:M2:M3=100:AP 33:AP 59 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=1.9 {I3}:0.95 {I12}:1.05 {I12} (1980Ab18);
165ER G 50.77 2 0.003 E2 46.9 7 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G LC=36.0 5$MC=8.76 12
165ERS G NC=1.975 28$OC=0.2271 32$PC=0.0001887 26
165ER2 G %IG=0.0011
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=|<0.022:0.25 {I8}:0.22 {I7} (1980Ab18)
165ER L 175.82 3 9/2-
165ER G 98.60 5 0.013 [M1+E2] 3.03 8 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G EKC=12 6
165ERS G KC=1.8 7$LC=0.9 6$MC=0.23 14
165ERS G NC=0.052 32$OC=0.0063 35$PC=1.0E-4 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.0046
165ER cG $|a(K)exp from Ice(K)=0.082 {I16} (1980Ab18) and I|g, with
165ER2cG assumed 50% uncertainty for I|g is much larger than |a(K)(M1)=2.5
165ER3cG and |a(K)(E2)=1.1
165ER G 175.86 7 0.063 7(E2) 0.388 5
165ER2 G EKC=0.26 16
165ERS G KC=0.2354 33$LC=0.1177 17$MC=0.0282 4
165ERS G NC=0.00641 9$OC=0.000781 11$PC=1.075E-5 15
165ER2 G %IG=0.0224 27
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.11 {I6}. Ice(K)=0.074 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER L 242.929 4 3/2- 0.31 NS 4
165ER2 L MOMM1=+0.62 21 (1978EgZY)
165ER cL T$weighted average of 0.30 ns {I5} (1974An04) and 0.321 ns
165ER2cL {I51} (1968Ad05)
165ER E 8E-4 42.4 138.02 +34-19 2.4 13
165ERS E EAV=161.9 7$CK=0.82744 26$CL=0.13067 11$CM+=0.04156 11
165ER G 165.659 15 0.44 6E2 0.477 7 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.24 4 $ K:L1:L2:L3=875:100:313:250 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.280 4$LC=0.1515 21$MC=0.0364 5
165ERS G NC=0.00826 12$OC=0.001003 14$PC=1.258E-5 18
165ER2 G %IG=0.156 22
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.66 {I8}:0.066 {I8}:0.164 {I16}:0.131
165ER2cG {I16} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=0.70 {I5}
165ER G 195.773 7 1.62 4E1 0.0550 8 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.040 5
165ERS G KC=0.0462 6$LC=0.00686 10$MC=0.001515 21
165ERS G NC=0.000349 5$OC=4.83E-5 7$PC=2.280E-6 32
165ER2 G %IG=0.575 28
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=833:100:LT 33 (1970Ab18)$
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.37 {I6}:|?0.05:|<0.016
165ER2cG (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=0.44 {I5}
165ER cG $|d(M2/E1)=+0.22 {I+13-10} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER G 242.917 7 100.0 20M1+E2 0.12 +5-7 0.234 4 C
165ER2 G K:L1:L2:L3=686:100:9.2:1.6 (1970Ab18)$
165ERS G KC=0.1968 31$LC=0.0293 4$MC=0.00651 9
165ERS G NC=0.001517 21$OC=0.0002192 31$PC=1.203E-5 20
165ER2 G %IG=35.5 17
165ER CG $M1:M2:M3=100:9.1:AP 1.8 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $|a(K)=0.197 {I4} from BrIcc was used for normalization of |a(K)exp for
165ER2cG other transitions. Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=100:14.6:1.34:0.24
165ER3cG (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=100.0 {I19}
165ER cG $|d(E2/M1)=0.12 {I+5-7} from L- and M-subshell data.
165ER L 296.124 4 5/2- 0.24 NS LE
165ER E 7.94E-6 0.49999 9.4 GT 0.5 LT 1U?
165ERS E EAV=146.6 7$CK=0.81408 30$CL=0.14059 13$CM+=0.04532 13
165ER cE TI$0.0 {I5}% from |g-transition intensity balance
165ER G 53.182 15 1.60 12M1+E2 0.148 12 3.63 13
165ER2 G %IG=0.57 5
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G L1:L2:L3=100:27:13 (1970Ab18)$ M1:M2:M3=100:30:15 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G LC=2.82 10$MC=0.639 25
165ERS G NC=0.148 6$OC=0.0203 6$PC=0.000907 13
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=16.4 {I16}:5.5 {I5}:3.6 {I4} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 120.34 4 0.015 (E2) 1.479 21 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G EKC AP 0.66 30
165ERS G KC=0.677 10$LC=0.615 9$MC=0.1490 21
165ERS G NC=0.0338 5$OC=0.00401 6$PC=2.86E-5 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.0053
165ER cG $For |a(K)exp, 20% uncertainty assumed in I|g value
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.05 {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 218.859 6 9.4 5M1+E2 -0.26 7 0.306 6 C
165ER2 G %IG=3.34 23
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=0.208 15
165ERS G KC=0.255 6$LC=0.0396 6$MC=0.00883 16
165ERS G NC=0.002055 35$OC=0.000294 4$PC=1.55E-5 4
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=666:100:11:LT 3.3 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=12.2 {I16}:1.64 {I16}:0.181 {I16}:0.066
165ER2cG {I16} (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=13.3 {I6}
165ER cG MR$from ce and |d=-0.30 {I10} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02); sign from |g|g(|q)
165ER G 248.962 7 2.25 6 (E1+M2) 0.08 +4-7 0.036 8 &
165ER2 G EKC=0.0300 26$ K:L1:L2:L3=714:100:13:14 (1970Ab18)
165ER2 G %IG=0.80 4
165ERS G KC=0.030 6$LC=0.0047 13$MC=1.04E-3 29
165ERS G NC=2.4E-4 7$OC=3.4E-5 10$PC=1.7E-6 5
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.29 {I3}:0.06 {I1}:0.082 {I8} (1980Ab18).
165ER2cG Ice(K)=0.54 {I5} for doublet
165ER cG $|d(M2/E1)=+0.42 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER G 296.119 9 10.92 24M1+E2 0.40 LT 0.134 5
165ER2 G %IG=3.88 19
165ER cG M$E2 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=0.050 11
165ERS G KC=0.112 5$LC=0.01693 28$MC=0.00376 6
165ERS G NC=0.000877 13$OC=0.0001261 25$PC=6.79E-6 32
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=677:100:AP 10:LE 3.1 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=6.8 {I12}:1.00 {I12}:0.10 {I2} (1980Ab18).
165ER2cG Ice(K)=3.7 {I9}
165ER cG MR$from K, L1 and L2 intensities.
165ER L 297.367 5 1/2- 0.70 NS 8
165ER cL T$other: |<1.0 ns (1970BaYN)
165ER E 0.00502 2934.4 176.831 +25-24 34.4 17
165ERS E EAV=137.1 7$CK=0.82713 27$CL=0.13102 11$CM+=0.04170 11
165ER G 54.415 11 20.3 5M1(+E2) 0.017 LT 2.70 4 C
165ER2 G %IG=7.2 4
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G L1:L2:L3=100:9.2:1.4 (1970Ab18) $ M1:M2:M3=100:9.2:1.4 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G LC=2.110 30$MC=0.468 7
165ERS G NC=0.1091 15$OC=0.01575 22$PC=0.000863 12
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=189 {I13}:23.6 {I15}:7.6 {I5} (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $|d=-0.16 {I4} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG MR$from L1, L2, M1, M2 and M3 electron intensity ratios.
165ER G 297.369 6 35.8 7E2 0.0709 10 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.054 4 $K:L1:L2:L3=722:100:94:67 (1970Ab18)
165ER2 G M1:M2:M3=100:100:77 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0518 7$LC=0.01476 21$MC=0.00345 5
165ERS G NC=0.000790 11$OC=0.0001015 14$PC=2.66E-6 4
165ER2 G %IG=12.7 6
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=10.0 {I16}:1.4 {I2}:1.30 {I12}:0.93
165ER2cG {I12} (1980Ab18).
165ER cG $Ice(K)=13.1 {I11}
165ER L 356.525 4 3/2- 0.35 NS 6
165ER E 5.5E-4 411.7 77.257 +29-28 11.7 7
165ERS E EAV=109.7 7$CK=0.82667 27$CL=0.13143 11$CM+=0.04185 11
165ER G 59.129 22 0.164 13M1+E2 0.77 8 17.1 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.058 5
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G L1:L2:L3=100:375:250 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=7.4 4$LC=7.4 8$MC=1.79 19
165ERS G NC=0.41 4$OC=0.048 5$PC=0.000476 28
165ER CG $M1:M2:M3=100:AP 333:AP 256 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.90 {I8}:2.7 {I3}:3.0 {I3} (1980Ab18).
165ER G 60.399 4 2.00 4M1+E2 0.044 +14-1912.13 17
165ERS G KC=10.11 14$LC=1.578 30$MC=0.351 7
165ERS G NC=0.0817 16$OC=0.01175 21$PC=0.000635 9
165ER2 G %IG=0.710 33
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER CG $L1:L2:L3=100:11:LT 2.1; M1:M2=100:11 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=14.4 {I16}:1.44 {I16}:0.36 {I8} (1980Ab18).
165ER cG MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: -0.20 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER G 113.599 4 4.40 9M1+E2 0.081 +24-331.974 28 C
165ER2 G %IG=1.56 7
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=1.51 15$
165ERS G KC=1.652 23$LC=0.252 4$MC=0.0560 10
165ERS G NC=0.01304 23$OC=0.001878 30$PC=0.0001017 15
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=778:100:11:LE 1.9 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=37 {I4}:5.1 {I5}:0.52 {I5}:0.115 {I16}
165ER2cG (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=45 {I4}
165ER cG MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: +0.26 {I2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER G 279.264 7 1.69 5E2 0.0860 12 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.041 5$ K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:80:50 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0619 9$LC=0.01862 26$MC=0.00437 6
165ERS G NC=0.001000 14$OC=0.0001275 18$PC=3.14E-6 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.600 31
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.53 {I12}:0.074 {I8}:0.056 {I8}:0.041
165ER2cG {I8} (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.50 {I6}
165ER G 309.4 3 0.22 (E1) 0.0171724 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=0.01450 21$LC=0.002089 30$MC=0.000461 7
165ERS G NC=0.0001065 15$OC=1.498E-5 21$PC=7.51E-7 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.078
165ER cG $Ice(K)|?0.016 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 356.519 12 7.75 23M1+E2 0.84 13 0.0665 35
165ER2 G %IG=2.75 14
165ER cG M$E2 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=0.0320 19$
165ERS G KC=0.0546 32$LC=0.00928 24$MC=0.00209 5
165ERS G NC=0.000484 12$OC=6.78E-5 21$PC=3.22E-6 21
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=833:100:20:AP 10 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.1 {I5}:0.28 {I3}:0.056 {I7}:|?0.028
165ER2cG (1980Ab18). Ice(K)=1.68 {I10}
165ER cG MR$from L1, L2 and L3 intensity ratios.
165ER L 372.716 14 7/2-
165ER G 76.56 2 0.005 M1(+E2) 0.3 LT 6.23 13 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=5.01 15$LC=0.95 17$MC=0.22 4
165ERS G NC=0.050 10$OC=0.0069 11$PC=0.000309 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.0018
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.12 {I4}:0.016 {I8}:|<0.006 (1980Ab18).
165ER G 129.82 4 0.02 [E2] 1.124 16 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=0.553 8$LC=0.438 6$MC=0.1059 15
165ERS G NC=0.02402 34$OC=0.00286 4$PC=2.363E-5 33
165ER2 G %IG=0.007
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.06 {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 372.8 4 0.05 [M1+E2] 0.056 19 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=0.045 18$LC=0.0079 13$MC=0.00179 25
165ERS G NC=0.00041 6$OC=5.8E-5 11$PC=2.7E-6 12
165ER2 G %IG=0.018
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.016 {I5} (1980Ab18)
165ER L 384.341 7 5/2-
165ER E 1.049E-7 0.05 10.3 GT 0.05 LT 1U?
165ERS E EAV=102.4 8$CK=0.81205 31$CL=0.14207 13$CM+=0.04589 13
165ER cE TI$-0.01 {I6} from |g-transition intensity balance
165ER G 11.60 2 M1 262 4 0.5 1 d
165ERS G L/T=0.775 8$M/T=0.1741 33
165ERS G N/T=0.0406 8$O/T=0.00584 12$P/T=0.000319 7
165ERS G LC=203.6 30$MC=45.7 7
165ERS G NC=10.65 16$OC=1.534 23$PC=0.0838 13
165ER cG TI$from |g-transition intensity balance at 384.3 level
165ER cG M$small E2 admixture is also possible (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(M1):Ice(M2):Ice(M3)=0.66 {I25}:0.41 {I16}:0.33 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 27.879 15 0.007 M1+E2 0.077 12 24.6 18 y
165ER2 G %IG=0.0025
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.030 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=356.525
165ERS G LC=19.1 14$MC=4.33 33
165ERS G NC=1.00 7$OC=0.138 8$PC=0.00617 9
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.41 {I8}:0.11 {I3}:0.070 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 86.93 1 0.10 E2 5.03 7 d
165ER2 G %IG=0.036
165ERF G FL=297.367
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.02 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G K:L1:L2=1200:100:800 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=1.456 20$LC=2.74 4$MC=0.667 9
165ERS G NC=0.1509 21$OC=0.01761 25$PC=6.17E-5 9
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.74 {I16}:0.066 {I16}:0.49 {I8}:0.49
165ER2cG {I8} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 88.205 15 0.133 14M1+E2 0.12 2 4.09 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.047 5
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=3.8 8 $
165ERS G KC=3.39 5$LC=0.544 13$MC=0.1214 31
165ERS G NC=0.0282 7$OC=0.00403 8$PC=0.0002094 30
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=600:100:LE 17 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.3 {I3}:0.39 {I4}:0.049 {I8}:0.020
165ER2cG {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER cG MR$from ce ratios (1980Ab18). Other: +0.44 {I+16-15}
165ERxcG (|g|g(|q),1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=2.6 {I3}
165ER G 141.36 7 0.083 13M1+E2 0.47 10 1.019 21
165ER2 G EKC=0.81 15 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.809 31$LC=0.163 11$MC=0.0373 28
165ERS G NC=0.0086 6$OC=0.00117 7$PC=4.84E-5 24
165ER2 G %IG=0.030 5
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.34 {I5}:0.046 {I9}:0.013 {I2}:0.011
165ER2cG {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 286.30 15 0.025 [M2] 0.643 9 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=0.515 7$LC=0.0992 14$MC=0.02274 32
165ERS G NC=0.00532 8$OC=0.000757 11$PC=3.91E-5 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.0089
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.077 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 307.067 11 0.446 12 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT 0.112 14 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.11 3 (1980Ab18)$ EKC=0.057 7 (1982Vy03)
165ERS G KC=0.092 13$LC=0.0150 6$MC=0.00335 9
165ERS G NC=0.000778 24$OC=0.000110 6$PC=5.5E-6 9
165ER2 G %IG=0.158 8
165ER cG M$E2 in 1982Vy03. |d(E2/M1) from |a(K)exp in 1980Ab18. |a(K)exp
165ER2cG in 1982Vy03 gives M1+E2, |d=2.0 {I5}
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.176 22. Ice(K)=0.25 4 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 384.53 4 0.43 5M1+E2 1.1 +8-5 0.050 10
165ER2 G %IG=0.153 19
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.08 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER2 G EKC=0.05 1 (1980Ab18)$ EKC=0.037 5 (1982Vy03)$ K:L1=1.3:0.2 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.040 9$LC=0.0071 7$MC=0.00161 14
165ERS G NC=0.000372 34$OC=5.2E-5 6$PC=2.4E-6 6
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.11 {I2}:0.014 {I3}:0.028 {I3}:|<0.014
165ER2cG (1980Ab18)
165ER cG MR$from |a(K)exp (1980Ab18,1982Vy03) and K/L1 ratios in 1980Ab18 and
165ER2cG 1970Ab18
165ER L 477.758 8 5/2-
165ER E 2.8E-9 170.07 410.0 +4-2 0.07 4 1U
165ERS E EAV=53.2 8$CK=0.80947 32$CL=0.14394 14$CM+=0.04659 13
165ER G 181.61 4 0.049 5 M1(+E2) 1.2 LT 0.47 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.0174 19
165ER cG M$(M1,E2) in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=0.39 8 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.37 7$LC=0.077 11$MC=0.0175 30
165ERS G NC=0.0040 7$OC=0.00055 6$PC=2.2E-5 5
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.097 {I16}. Ice(K)=0.10 {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 234.789 22 0.183 7 M1(+E2) 1.2 LT 0.226 33 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.20 5 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.183 34$LC=0.0334 13$MC=0.0076 4
165ERS G NC=0.00175 9$OC=0.000242 4$PC=1.09E-5 25
165ER2 G %IG=0.065 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.18 {I3} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 400.520 11 0.393 9 [M1+E2] 0.046 16 C
165ERS G KC=0.038 15$LC=0.0064 12$MC=0.00145 24
165ERS G NC=0.00034 6$OC=4.7E-5 10$PC=2.2E-6 10
165ER2 G %IG=0.140 7
165ER G 415.12 3 0.171 8 [E1] 0.0085112 C
165ERS G KC=0.00721 10$LC=0.001020 14$MC=0.0002245 31
165ERS G NC=5.20E-5 7$OC=7.38E-6 10$PC=3.82E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.061 4
165ER G 430.594 21 0.79 4 E1 0.0078211
165ER2 G EKC=0.0064 6
165ERS G KC=0.00663 9$LC=0.000936 13$MC=0.0002059 29
165ERS G NC=4.77E-5 7$OC=6.77E-6 9$PC=3.52E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.281 19
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.034 {I3}
165ER G 477.791 23 1.13 4M1+E2 1.2 4 0.027 4
165ER2 G EKC=0.0213 16$
165ERS G KC=0.022 4$LC=0.0037 4$MC=0.00084 8
165ERS G NC=0.000194 18$OC=2.72E-5 29$PC=1.30E-6 24
165ER2 G %IG=0.401 22
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=733:100:LT 20 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.183 {I13}
165ER L 507.421 5 1/2+ 0.70 NS 12
165ER E 3.9E-7 65.8 37.443 +26-25 5.8 3
165ERS E EAV=35.5 8$CK=0.82503 27$CL=0.13265 11$CM+=0.04232 11
165ER G 150.894 5 1.59 4E1 0.1090 15 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.087 8$
165ERS G KC=0.0913 13$LC=0.01387 19$MC=0.00307 4
165ERS G NC=0.000705 10$OC=9.65E-5 14$PC=4.36E-6 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.565 28
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=1333:100:LE 25:AP 33 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.72 {I2}:0.082 {I8}:0.0164
165ER2cG {I16}:0.0164 {I16} (1980Ab18).
165ER2cG Other: E1(+M2) with -0.25<|d<+0.01 (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.95 {I8}
165ER G 210.053 7 2.36 5E1 0.0458 6 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.032 11
165ERS G KC=0.0385 5$LC=0.00569 8$MC=0.001256 18
165ERS G NC=0.000290 4$OC=4.02E-5 6$PC=1.916E-6 27
165ER2 G %IG=0.84 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.52 {I19}
165ER G 264.492 7 1.56 4E1 0.0254 4 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0314 26 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.02140 30$LC=0.00311 4$MC=0.000687 10
165ERS G NC=0.0001586 22$OC=2.220E-5 31$PC=1.092E-6 15
165ER2 G %IG=0.554 27
165ER cG $Other: E1+M2 with |d=-0.33 {I+6-7} (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.33 3. Ice(K)=0.16 3 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 460.263 16 11.6 4E2 0.0204229
165ER2 G EKC=0.0126 7 (1982Vy03) $ K:L1:L2:L3=706:100:48:24 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.01609 23$LC=0.00335 5$MC=0.000768 11
165ERS G NC=0.0001769 25$OC=2.374E-5 33$PC=8.83E-7 12
165ER2 G %IG=4.12 23
165ER cG MR$|d=0.0 (E2+M3) from |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.99 {I4}
165ER L 519.144 6 5/2+
165ER E 1.5E-10 100.15 99.6 +4-2 0.15 9 ?
165ERS E EAV=29.4 9$CK=0.80816 33$CL=0.14488 14$CM+=0.04695 13
165ER cE TI$no |e feeding is expected to this level from |DJ=2, |D|p=no
165ER G 162.60 3 0.18 4E1 0.0895 13
165ER2 G EKC=0.073 15 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0750 11$LC=0.01132 16$MC=0.002502 35
165ERS G NC=0.000575 8$OC=7.90E-5 11$PC=3.62E-6 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.064 15
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.066 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 421.179 10 0.921 20E2 0.0259 4 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0155 17
165ERS G KC=0.02020 28$LC=0.00444 6$MC=0.001021 14
165ERS G NC=0.0002350 33$OC=3.13E-5 4$PC=1.097E-6 15
165ER2 G %IG=0.327 16
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.097 10
165ER G 456.459 15 3.52 16M1+E2 0.62 11 0.0377 17 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0251 17 (1982Vy03) $ K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:8:4 (1970Ab18)
165ER2 G %IG=1.25 8
165ERS G KC=0.0314 15$LC=0.00485 16$MC=0.001081 33
165ERS G NC=0.000251 8$OC=3.59E-5 12$PC=1.88E-6 10
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.60 3
165ER G 471.979 10 0.994 23 M1+E2 0.79 14 0.0323 19 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0242 13 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G NC=0.000220 9$OC=3.12E-5 14$PC=1.59E-6 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.353 17
165ERS G KC=0.0268 17$LC=0.00424 17$MC=0.00095 4
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=600:100:12:LE 4 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.164 {I9}
165ER L 534.571 10 3/2+
165ER E 2.5E-9 81.26 68.083 +24-23 1.26 6
165ERS E EAV=14.8 14$CK=0.82467 28$CL=0.13291 11$CM+=0.04242 11
165ER G 149.65 6 0.082 15E1 0.1115 16
165ER2 G %IG=0.029 6
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=384.341
165ER2 G EKC=0.08 2 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0933 13$LC=0.01419 20$MC=0.00314 4
165ERS G NC=0.000721 10$OC=9.87E-5 14$PC=4.45E-6 6
165ER G 238.471 18 0.45 4 (E1) 0.0330 5 &
165ER2 G EKC=0.035 7 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0278 4$LC=0.00407 6$MC=0.000899 13
165ERS G NC=0.0002074 29$OC=2.89E-5 4$PC=1.404E-6 20
165ER2 G %IG=0.160 16
165ER G 487.399 10 2.94 6M1 0.0373 5 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0205 11 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.0314 4$LC=0.00455 6$MC=0.001005 14
165ERS G NC=0.0002344 33$OC=3.40E-5 5$PC=1.901E-6 27
165ER2 G %IG=1.04 5
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=650:100:7.7:LT 5 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.452 24
165ER G 534.72 7 0.094 10 (E1) 0.00482 7
165ER2 G EKC=0.0035 20
165ERS G KC=0.00409 6$LC=0.000570 8$MC=0.0001253 18
165ERS G NC=2.91E-5 4$OC=4.15E-6 6$PC=2.197E-7 31
165ER2 G %IG=0.033 4
165ER cG $|a(K)exp=0.36 {I20} in 1982Vy03 is a misprint
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.022 12
165ER L 589.759 5 3/2+
165ER E 4.05 217.527 +26-25 4.05 21
165ERS E CK=0.82388 28$CL=0.13348 11$CM+=0.04263 11
165ER G 70.610 5 0.595 17M1+E2 0.05 +4-3 7.77 11 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.211 11
165ER cG M$(M1) in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=4.5 5$
165ERS G KC=6.49 9$LC=1.00 4$MC=0.222 9
165ERS G NC=0.0517 21$OC=0.00744 24$PC=0.000403 6
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=AP 714:100:10:AP 2.3; M1:M2=100:LE 12 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=2.7 {I3}:0.27 {I3}:0.066 {I16} (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=13.8 {I17}
165ER G 82.33 1 0.012 M1+E2 0.23 LT 5.01 8 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G %IG=0.0043
165ERS G KC=4.11 9$LC=0.70 7$MC=0.158 18
165ERS G NC=0.037 4$OC=0.0051 5$PC=0.000253 6
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=735:100:LT 24 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.25 {I8}:0.033 {I8}:<0.008 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 205.402 11 1.20 3 E1 0.0485 7 C
165ERF G FL=384.341
165ER2 G EKC=0.067 19 (1982Vy03)$ EKC=0.04 2 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0408 6$LC=0.00604 8$MC=0.001333 19
165ERS G NC=0.000307 4$OC=4.26E-5 6$PC=2.025E-6 28
165ER2 G %IG=0.426 21
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.55 {I16}
165ER G 233.280 13 0.290 9E1 0.0349 5 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.103 6
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.026 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER2 G EKC=0.033 7 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.0294 4$LC=0.00431 6$MC=0.000952 13
165ERS G NC=0.0002197 31$OC=3.06E-5 4$PC=1.481E-6 21
165ER G 346.825 11 0.62 2E1 0.0130118 x
165ERS G KC=0.01100 15$LC=0.001573 22$MC=0.000347 5
165ERS G NC=8.02E-5 11$OC=1.132E-5 16$PC=5.75E-7 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.220 12
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=800:100:AP 10 (1970Ab18)
165ER G 527.106 12 2.66 6E2 0.0143720 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0078 6 (1982Vy03) $
165ERS G KC=0.01151 16$LC=0.002225 31$MC=0.000506 7
165ERS G NC=0.0001169 16$OC=1.589E-5 22$PC=6.40E-7 9
165ER2 G %IG=0.94 5
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=667:100:33:AP 23 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.157 {I11}
165ER G 542.622 11 4.04 21M1+E2 0.61 17 0.0242 17 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0165 15 (1982Vy03)$
165ER2 G %IG=1.43 10
165ERS G KC=0.0203 15$LC=0.00306 16$MC=0.000680 34
165ERS G NC=0.000158 8$OC=2.27E-5 13$PC=1.21E-6 9
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=686:100:8.6:LE 4 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.45 {I3}
165ER L 589.882 8 1/2- 0.6 NS LE
165ER E 6.1 37.349 +25-24 6.1 3
165ERS E CK=0.82388 28$CL=0.13349 11$CM+=0.04263 11
165ER G 292.410 14 3.58 11 (M1) 0.1428 20 C
165ER2 G %IG=1.27 7
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.056 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER cG M$(M1) in 1982Vy03, M1+E2 in 1980Ab18; |DJ|p requires M1
165ER2 G EKC=0.09 3$ K:L1:L2:L3=667:100:13:13 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=1.8 {I3}:0.24 {I3}:0.033 {I8}:0.033
165ER2cG {I8} (1980Ab18)
165ERF G FL=297.367
165ERS G KC=0.1202 17$LC=0.01767 25$MC=0.00391 5
165ERS G NC=0.000913 13$OC=0.0001322 19$PC=7.34E-6 10
165ER cG $Ice(K)=2.2 8
165ER G 346.933 11 8.1 3M1(+E2) 0.53 LT 0.086 5 x
165ER2 G %IG=2.88 16
165ER cG MR$from |a(K) value. Others: 0.086 (1983Mo10); -0.23 {I+7-8} (|g|g(|q))
165ERxcG (1988Ul02)
165ER cG M$M1 in 1982Vy03
165ER2 G EKC=0.073 4 (1982Vy03)$ EKC=0.076 15 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.072 5$LC=0.01086 33$MC=0.00241 6
165ERS G NC=0.000562 16$OC=8.08E-5 29$PC=4.33E-6 32
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=800:100:AP 10 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=3.3 {I7}:0.41 {I4}:|?0.04 (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $(346.9|g)(242.9|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.057 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.034 {I38}
165ERxcG (1975Fu13)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=4.30 {I21} for doublet
165ER G 589.912 15 5.13 22E2 0.0108815 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0073 6 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.00881 12$LC=0.001612 23$MC=0.000365 5
165ERS G NC=8.44E-5 12$OC=1.158E-5 16$PC=4.93E-7 7
165ER2 G %IG=1.82 11
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=866:100:27:AP 17 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.251 {I16}
165ER L 605.486 8 (3/2+)
165ER E 0.85 218.19 +13-10 0.85 21
165ERS E CK=0.82364 28$CL=0.13366 11$CM+=0.04269 11
165ER G 127.69 4 0.06 [E1] 0.1699 24 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G %IG=0.021
165ERS G KC=0.1419 20$LC=0.02193 31$MC=0.00485 7
165ERS G NC=0.001113 16$OC=0.0001511 21$PC=6.62E-6 9
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.04 {I2} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 221.15 5 0.66 [E1] 0.0401 6 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ER2 G %IG=0.234
165ERS G KC=0.0337 5$LC=0.00496 7$MC=0.001096 15
165ERS G NC=0.0002528 35$OC=3.52E-5 5$PC=1.688E-6 24
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.11 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 248.962 7 2.25 LT (E1+M2) 0.08 +4-7 0.036 8 &
165ER2 G EKC=0.030 3 (1982Vy03)$ EKC=0.026 6 (1980Ab18)
165ER2 G K:L1:L2=714:100:14 (1970Ab18)
165ER2 G %IG LT 0.80
165ERS G KC=0.030 6$LC=0.0047 13$MC=1.04E-3 29
165ERS G NC=2.4E-4 7$OC=3.4E-5 10$PC=1.7E-6 5
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)0.29 {I3}:0.06 {I1}:0.08 {I1} (1980Ab18)
165ER G 362.3 2 d
165ER G 605.93 3 0.46 3 [E1] 0.00369 5 &C
165ER2 G %IG=0.163 13
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=0.0
165ERS G KC=0.00313 4$LC=0.000434 6$MC=9.52E-5 13
165ERS G NC=2.210E-5 31$OC=3.16E-6 4$PC=1.692E-7 24
165ER L 608.502 7 3/2-
165ER E 1.53 87.932 +26-25 1.53 8
165ERS E CK=0.82359 28$CL=0.13369 11$CM+=0.04271 11
165ER G 224.02 8 0.078 15M1 0.294 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.028 6
165ER cG M$some E2 admixture is also possible (1980Ab18)
165ER2 G EKC=0.23 4 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.2474 35$LC=0.0366 5$MC=0.00812 11
165ERS G NC=0.001893 27$OC=0.000274 4$PC=1.516E-5 21
165ER G 251.7 3 0.033 (M1) 0.2142 31 d
165ERF G FLAG=y
165ERS G KC=0.1801 26$LC=0.0266 4$MC=0.00589 8
165ERS G NC=0.001374 20$OC=0.0001989 29$PC=1.102E-5 16
165ER2 G %IG=0.0117
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.030 1 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 312.327 12 1.31 7M1 0.1197 17 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.465 32
165ERF G FL=296.124
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.024 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER2 G EKC=0.085 6$
165ERS G KC=0.1008 14$LC=0.01479 21$MC=0.00327 5
165ERS G NC=0.000764 11$OC=0.0001106 15$PC=6.15E-6 9
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:AP 10:LT 2.5 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1)=0.76 {I8}:0.107 {I12} (1980Ab18).
165ER2cG Other: M1(+E2) with |d=-0.20 {I17} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.76 5
165ER G 365.577 8 1.38 4M1+E2 1.14 +25-210.056 4 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0429 23$
165ER2 G %IG=0.490 25
165ERS G KC=0.045 4$LC=0.00823 29$MC=0.00186 6
165ERS G NC=0.000431 14$OC=5.96E-5 25$PC=2.64E-6 25
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=700:100:LE 20:LT 10 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2)=0.41 {I8}:0.066 {I8}:|<0.016 (1980Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.403 21
165ER G 531.243 26 0.372 13E2 0.0140920 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.008 3
165ERS G KC=0.01129 16$LC=0.002174 30$MC=0.000495 7
165ERS G NC=0.0001142 16$OC=1.553E-5 22$PC=6.28E-7 9
165ER2 G %IG=0.132 7
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.020 7
165ER G 608.527 16 1.27 4E2 0.0100914
165ER2 G EKC=0.0085 9$ K:L1=600:100 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.00819 11$LC=0.001479 21$MC=0.000335 5
165ERS G NC=7.73E-5 11$OC=1.064E-5 15$PC=4.60E-7 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.451 24
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.074 8
165ER L 745.946 9 1/2+ 1.00 NS 15
165ER E 6.0 37.201 +25-24 6.0 3
165ERS E CK=0.82104 29$CL=0.13554 12$CM+=0.04342 11
165ER G 156.10 3 0.033 16E1 0.0997 14 x
165ERF G FL=589.882
165ERS G KC=0.0835 12$LC=0.01264 18$MC=0.00280 4
165ERS G NC=0.000643 9$OC=8.81E-5 12$PC=4.01E-6 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.012 6
165ER G 156.21 3 0.049 16M1 0.801 11 x
165ERF G FL=589.759
165ER2 G %IG=0.017 6
165ER cG M$E2 for a complex line (1980Ab18)
165ER2 G EKC=0.22 5 (1980Ab18) $ K:L1=1.1 2:0.15 2
165ERS G KC=0.672 9$LC=0.1002 14$MC=0.02223 31
165ERS G NC=0.00518 7$OC=0.000750 11$PC=4.14E-5 6
165ER G 238.471 18 0.45 4 [M1] 0.2481 35 &
165ER2 G %IG=0.160 16
165ERS G KC=0.2086 29$LC=0.0308 4$MC=0.00683 10
165ERS G NC=0.001593 22$OC=0.0002306 32$PC=1.277E-5 18
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.036 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER cG M$(E1) listed by 1980Ab18 is inconsistent with 1/2+ to 1/2+ transition
165ER G 389.404 14 7.94 18E1 0.0098814 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0064 4
165ERS G KC=0.00836 12$LC=0.001188 17$MC=0.000262 4
165ERS G NC=6.06E-5 8$OC=8.57E-6 12$PC=4.41E-7 6
165ER2 G %IG=2.82 14
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=717:100:LT 17 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.33 {I3}:0.041 {I4}:|?0.004:|?0.003
165ER2cG (1980Ab18). Other: |d(M2/E1)=-0.13 {I+3-2} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.341 20
165ER G 448.580 14 4.59 15E1 0.0071310 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0044 4 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.00604 8$LC=0.000850 12$MC=0.0001871 26
165ERS G NC=4.34E-5 6$OC=6.16E-6 9$PC=3.21E-7 4
165ER2 G %IG=1.63 9
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=800:100:LT 16 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.137 10
165ER G 698.843 16 3.62 13E2 0.0073010 C
165ER2 G %IG=1.29 7
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.032 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER2 G EKC=0.0065 4 (1982Vy03) $ K:L1=520:100 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.00599 8$LC=0.001021 14$MC=0.0002298 32
165ERS G NC=5.32E-5 7$OC=7.40E-6 10$PC=3.38E-7 5
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.158 5
165ER L 853.538 8 3/2+
165ER E 10.1 66.849 +30-28 10.1 6
165ERS E CK=0.81831 31$CL=0.13752 13$CM+=0.04418 13
165ER G 318.84 7 0.031 7M1 0.1133 16
165ER2 G EKC=0.10 6
165ERS G KC=0.0954 13$LC=0.01399 20$MC=0.00310 4
165ERS G NC=0.000722 10$OC=0.0001046 15$PC=5.81E-6 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.0110 25
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.021 13
165ER G 334.34 10 0.042 6 (M1,E2) 0.075 25
165ER2 G EKC=0.02 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.061 23$LC=0.0110 13$MC=0.00249 24
165ERS G NC=0.00058 6$OC=8.0E-5 13$PC=3.5E-6 16
165ER2 G %IG=0.0149 22
165ER G 496.98 13 0.045 15 [E1] 0.00566 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.016 5
165ERS G KC=0.00480 7$LC=0.000672 9$MC=0.0001478 21
165ERS G NC=3.43E-5 5$OC=4.88E-6 7$PC=2.57E-7 4
165ER G 557.38 4 0.52 6 [E1] 0.00441 6 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.185 23
165ERS G KC=0.00374 5$LC=0.000520 7$MC=0.0001143 16
165ERS G NC=2.65E-5 4$OC=3.79E-6 5$PC=2.013E-7 28
165ER G 610.616 17 1.35 4 (E1) 0.00363 5 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0054 13
165ERS G KC=0.00308 4$LC=0.000426 6$MC=9.37E-5 13
165ERS G NC=2.174E-5 30$OC=3.11E-6 4$PC=1.666E-7 23
165ER2 G %IG=0.479 25
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.049 11
165ER G 790.873 18 1.29 3 E2 0.00553 8 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0038 3
165ERS G KC=0.00457 6$LC=0.000747 10$MC=0.0001674 23
165ERS G NC=3.88E-5 5$OC=5.44E-6 8$PC=2.59E-7 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.458 22
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0359 12
165ER G 806.372 17 26.8 9M1 0.0104615 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0088 4$
165ERS G KC=0.00885 12$LC=0.001258 18$MC=0.000277 4
165ERS G NC=6.47E-5 9$OC=9.40E-6 13$PC=5.30E-7 7
165ER2 G %IG=9.5 5
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=500:100:8.3:LT 4 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG MR$M1(+E2) with |d=+0.06 {I6} from |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=1.62 6
165ER G 853.568 22 0.454 19 [E1] 1.85E-3 3
165ER2 G %IG=0.161 10
165ERS G KC=0.001573 22$LC=0.0002138 30$MC=4.69E-5 7
165ERS G NC=1.089E-5 15$OC=1.567E-6 22$PC=8.59E-8 12
165ER L 920.716 9 1/2-
165ER E 3.83 227.181 +29-28 3.83 22
165ERS E CK=0.81612 32$CL=0.13910 14$CM+=0.04478 13
165ER G 330.777 10 0.248 14M1 0.1027 14 x
165ER2 G %IG=0.088 6
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.020 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=589.882
165ER cG M$E2 in 1982Vy03, M1+E2 in 1980Ab18 for a complex line
165ER2 G EKC=0.044 2
165ERS G KC=0.0865 12$LC=0.01267 18$MC=0.00281 4
165ERS G NC=0.000654 9$OC=9.48E-5 13$PC=5.27E-6 7
165ER cG $Ice(K):Ice(L1):Ice(L2):Ice(L3)=0.21 {I4}:0.029 {I3}:0.0033 {I8}:0.0021
165ER2cG {I4} (1980Ab18) (for 330.777|g+330.885|g)
165ER G 330.885 10 0.322 14E1 0.0145820 x
165ER2 G %IG=0.114 7
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.040 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=589.759
165ERS G KC=0.01232 17$LC=0.001767 25$MC=0.000389 5
165ERS G NC=9.01E-5 13$OC=1.270E-5 18$PC=6.41E-7 9
165ER cG M$see comment for 330.777|g
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.172 9 for doublet
165ER G 413.294 23 0.232 18(E1) 0.0086012
165ER2 G EKC=0.013 8
165ERS G KC=0.00728 10$LC=0.001030 14$MC=0.0002268 32
165ERS G NC=5.26E-5 7$OC=7.45E-6 10$PC=3.85E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.082 7
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.020 13
165ER G 442.980 16 2.06 8E2 0.0226132 C
165ERF G FL=477.758
165ER2 G EKC=0.0107 10 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.01774 25$LC=0.00378 5$MC=0.000867 12
165ERS G NC=0.0001997 28$OC=2.67E-5 4$PC=9.69E-7 14
165ER2 G %IG=0.73 4
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=880:100:AP 24:LE 12 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.150 14
165ER G 537.17 3 0.206 20 E2 0.0137119
165ER2 G %IG=0.073 8
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.30 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=384.341
165ER2 G EKC=0.018 5
165ERS G KC=0.01100 15$LC=0.002105 29$MC=0.000479 7
165ERS G NC=0.0001105 15$OC=1.505E-5 21$PC=6.12E-7 9
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.025 5
165ER G 564.183 17 6.5 4M1 0.0256 4 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0223 18 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.02163 30$LC=0.00311 4$MC=0.000688 10
165ERS G NC=0.0001604 22$OC=2.328E-5 33$PC=1.304E-6 18
165ER2 G %IG=2.31 17
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=685:100:7.7:LT 2.3 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $M1+E2 in |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02) with |d=-0.18 {I4} (|g|g(|q)) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.97 3
165ER G 623.39 3 0.549 17M1 0.0198928 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0214 13
165ERS G KC=0.01681 24$LC=0.002411 34$MC=0.000532 7
165ERS G NC=0.0001242 17$OC=1.803E-5 25$PC=1.011E-6 14
165ER2 G %IG=0.195 10
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0798 18
165ER G 677.85 3 0.417 16M1 0.0161123 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0133 9 $
165ERS G KC=0.01362 19$LC=0.001948 27$MC=0.000430 6
165ERS G NC=0.0001003 14$OC=1.456E-5 20$PC=8.18E-7 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.148 9
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=667:100:LT 33 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0378 10
165ER L 962.422 12 3/2-
165ER E 0.88 47.759 +24-23 0.88 4
165ERS E CK=0.81449 33$CL=0.14028 15$CM+=0.04522 13
165ER G 427.56 12 0.100 6 [E1] 0.0079511
165ER2 G %IG=0.0355 26
165ERS G KC=0.00674 9$LC=0.000951 13$MC=0.0002094 29
165ERS G NC=4.85E-5 7$OC=6.89E-6 10$PC=3.57E-7 5
165ER G 484.73 3 0.302 17
165ER2 G %IG=0.107 8
165ER G 578.049 16 0.467 12M1 0.0240934 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0205 13 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.02034 28$LC=0.00293 4$MC=0.000646 9
165ERS G NC=0.0001507 21$OC=2.187E-5 31$PC=1.226E-6 17
165ER2 G %IG=0.166 8
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=625:100:LT 50 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0650 20
165ER G 605.93 3 0.46 3 E2 0.0102014 &C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0067 24
165ERS G KC=0.00827 12$LC=0.001496 21$MC=0.000339 5
165ERS G NC=7.83E-5 11$OC=1.076E-5 15$PC=4.64E-7 7
165ER2 G %IG=0.163 13
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.021 7
165ER G 665.067 20 1.06 3 M1 0.0169024 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0152 11 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.01429 20$LC=0.002045 29$MC=0.000451 6
165ERS G NC=0.0001053 15$OC=1.529E-5 21$PC=8.59E-7 12
165ER2 G %IG=0.376 19
165ER CG $K:L1:L2:L3=600:100:LT 50:10 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.110 5
165ER G 719.58 8 0.049 6 &
165ER2 G %IG=0.0174 23
165ER L 999.853 20 3/2+
165ER E 0.293 198.179 +33-31 0.293 19
165ERS E CK=0.81282 34$CL=0.14149 15$CM+=0.04569 13
165ER G 410.02 7 0.097 10M1 0.0583 8
165ERF G FL=589.759
165ER2 G EKC=0.065 13
165ERS G KC=0.0492 7$LC=0.00715 10$MC=0.001583 22
165ERS G NC=0.000369 5$OC=5.35E-5 7$PC=2.98E-6 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.034 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.040 7
165ER G 492.41 3 0.276 19(E2) 0.0171124
165ER2 G EKC=0.011 6
165ERS G KC=0.01360 19$LC=0.00272 4$MC=0.000622 9
165ERS G NC=0.0001435 20$OC=1.938E-5 27$PC=7.51E-7 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.098 8
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.020 12
165ER G 703.66 19 0.050 7 [E1] 0.00271 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.0178 26
165ERS G KC=0.002303 32$LC=0.000316 4$MC=6.94E-5 10
165ERS G NC=1.610E-5 23$OC=2.310E-6 32$PC=1.250E-7 18
165ER G 937.39 10 0.054 6(E2) 0.00384 5
165ER2 G EKC=0.0018 6
165ERS G KC=0.00320 4$LC=0.000498 7$MC=0.0001110 16
165ERS G NC=2.58E-5 4$OC=3.64E-6 5$PC=1.823E-7 26
165ER2 G %IG=0.0192 23
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00066 21
165ER G 952.71 3 0.39 3 M1 0.0069410
165ER2 G EKC=0.0056 6
165ERS G KC=0.00588 8$LC=0.000831 12$MC=0.0001832 26
165ERS G NC=4.27E-5 6$OC=6.21E-6 9$PC=3.51E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.139 12
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0147 5
165ER L 1103.501 11 3/2+
165ER E 0.78 57.569 +33-31 0.78 5
165ERS E CK=0.8066 4$CL=0.14596 18$CM+=0.04740 14
165ER G 141.36 7 [E1] 0.1297 18
165ERF G FL=962.422
165ERS G KC=0.1085 15$LC=0.01658 23$MC=0.00367 5
165ERS G NC=0.000843 12$OC=0.0001149 16$PC=5.13E-6 7
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.14 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER G 249.83 4 0.40 4M1,E2 0.17 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.142 16
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.08 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=853.538
165ER2 G EKC=0.130 (1980Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.13 5$LC=0.0278 8$MC=0.0064 4
165ERS G NC=0.00147 7$OC=0.000198 6$PC=7.7E-6 35
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.28 3 (1980Ab18)
165ER G 494.94 5 0.148 8 [E1] 0.00571 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.053 4
165ERS G KC=0.00485 7$LC=0.000678 9$MC=0.0001492 21
165ERS G NC=3.46E-5 5$OC=4.93E-6 7$PC=2.59E-7 4
165ER G 513.627 14 0.23 E1 0.00526 7 x
165ERF G FL=589.882
165ERS G KC=0.00447 6$LC=0.000624 9$MC=0.0001372 19
165ERS G NC=3.18E-5 4$OC=4.54E-6 6$PC=2.394E-7 34
165ER2 G %IG=0.082
165ER G 513.735 14 0.68 5M1 0.0325 5 x
165ERF G FL=589.759
165ER2 G EKC=0.0218 27 $
165ERS G KC=0.0275 4$LC=0.00397 6$MC=0.000877 12
165ERS G NC=0.0002044 29$OC=2.97E-5 4$PC=1.659E-6 23
165ER2 G %IG=0.241 21
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=700:100:LE 40 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.136 15 for doublet
165ER G 570.4 8 0.023 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.0082 22
165ER G 595.95 13 0.066 20
165ER2 G %IG=0.023 7
165ER G 719.58 8 0.049 6 [E1] 0.00259 4 &
165ER2 G %IG=0.0174 23
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.16 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=384.341
165ERS G KC=0.002201 31$LC=0.000302 4$MC=6.62E-5 9
165ERS G NC=1.537E-5 22$OC=2.207E-6 31$PC=1.196E-7 17
165ER G 747.00 6 0.50 3 [E1] 2.40E-3 3 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0062 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.178 13
165ERS G KC=0.002042 29$LC=0.000279 4$MC=6.13E-5 9
165ERS G NC=1.424E-5 20$OC=2.045E-6 29$PC=1.111E-7 16
165ER cG $|a(K)exp is close to |a(K)(theory)=0.0052 for E2 and disagrees with
165ER2cG mult=E1 from level scheme
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0299 16
165ER L 1289.094 15 3/2-
165ER E 0.385 217.400 +31-30 0.385 21
165ERS E CK=0.7822 7$CL=0.1635 4$CM+=0.05421 21
165ER G 680.613 19 0.258 8M1 0.0159522 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0145 9 (1982Vy03)$
165ERS G KC=0.01348 19$LC=0.001928 27$MC=0.000426 6
165ERS G NC=9.93E-5 14$OC=1.442E-5 20$PC=8.10E-7 11
165ER2 G %IG=0.092 5
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=583:100:LT 33 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0255 7
165ER G 932.56 4 0.19 3 M1 0.0073110
165ER2 G EKC=0.0068 13
165ERS G KC=0.00619 9$LC=0.000876 12$MC=0.0001931 27
165ERS G NC=4.50E-5 6$OC=6.55E-6 9$PC=3.70E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.068 11
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0089 3
165ER G 991.77 6 0.118 9M1(+E2) 0.5 +4-5 0.0057 7
165ER2 G EKC=0.0048 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.042 4
165ERS G KC=0.0048 6$LC=0.00069 8$MC=0.000152 17
165ERS G NC=3.5E-5 4$OC=5.1E-6 6$PC=2.9E-7 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00388 24
165ER G 1046.07 7 0.217 10M1+E2 0.77 +36-300.0046 5 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0039 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.077 5
165ERS G KC=0.0039 4$LC=0.00056 5$MC=0.000123 11
165ERS G NC=2.88E-5 27$OC=4.2E-6 4$PC=2.30E-7 26
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0059 4
165ER G 1289.04 3 0.293 7M1+E2 1.8 +11-5 0.0023518
165ER2 G EKC=0.00197 14
165ER2 G %IG=0.104 5
165ERS G KC=0.00197 16$LC=0.000283 21$MC=6.3E-5 5
165ERS G NC=1.46E-5 11$OC=2.10E-6 16$PC=1.14E-7 10$IPC=1.80E-5 5
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00392 17
165ER L 1339.41 5 5/2-
165ER E 0.155 126.86 5 0.155 12 1U?
165ERS E CK=0.6134 27$CL=0.2850 17$CM+=0.1016 7
165ER cE $Value of log| {Ift} is inconsistent with expected value of >8.5 for
165ER2cE first-forbidden unique transition.
165ER G 749.01 13 0.212 20 [E2] 0.00624 9 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.075 8
165ERS G KC=0.00514 7$LC=0.000856 12$MC=0.0001920 27
165ERS G NC=4.45E-5 6$OC=6.21E-6 9$PC=2.91E-7 4
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.26 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=589.882
165ER cG E$|g to 589.905 and/or 589.781
165ER G 955.28 13 0.053 6M1 0.0069010
165ER2 G EKC=0.0054 10
165ERS G KC=0.00584 8$LC=0.000825 12$MC=0.0001819 25
165ERS G NC=4.24E-5 6$OC=6.17E-6 9$PC=3.49E-7 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.0188 23
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0020 3
165ER G 1096.47 7 0.038 4(M1) 0.00493 7
165ERF G FL=242.929
165ER2 G EKC=0.0035 21
165ERS G KC=0.00418 6$LC=0.000588 8$MC=0.0001296 18
165ERS G NC=3.02E-5 4$OC=4.40E-6 6$PC=2.489E-7 35
165ER2 G %IG=0.0135 15
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0009 5
165ER G 1262.09 9 0.035 8M1 0.00353 5
165ERF G FL=77.258
165ER2 G EKC=0.0031 9
165ERS G KC=0.00298 4$LC=0.000418 6$MC=9.20E-5 13
165ERS G NC=2.145E-5 30$OC=3.12E-6 4$PC=1.772E-7 25$IPC=1.564E-5 22
165ER2 G %IG=0.0124 29
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00076 12
165ER G 1277.79 6 0.041 11 [E1]
165ER2 G %IG=0.015 4
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.48 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=62.672
165ERS G CC=0.000935 13$KC=0.000751 11$LC=0.0001002 14$MC=2.192E-5 31
165ERS G NC=5.10E-6 7$OC=7.38E-7 10$PC=4.13E-8 6$IPC=5.66E-5 8
165ER G 1339.39 6 0.058 10[M1,E2] 0.0025 6 &
165ER2 G %IG=0.021 4
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.12 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ER2 G EKC=0.0021 10
165ERS G KC=0.0021 5$LC=0.00030 7$MC=6.5E-5 15
165ERS G NC=1.52E-5 34$OC=2.2E-6 5$PC=1.22E-7 32$IPC=2.96E-5 28
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0008 3 for doublet
165ER L 1411.92 7 3/2+
165ER E 0.46 36.75 4 0.46 3
165ERS E CK=0.7248 18$CL=0.2047 11$CM+=0.0705 5
165ER G 558.74 3 0.89 4M1 0.0263 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.316 20
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=853.538
165ER2 G EKC=0.022 3 (1982Vy03)$ K:L1:L2=600:100:25 (1970Ab18)
165ERS G KC=0.02217 31$LC=0.00319 4$MC=0.000705 10
165ERS G NC=0.0001645 23$OC=2.387E-5 33$PC=1.337E-6 19
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.204 {I13}
165ER G 821.54 3 0.287 19M1 0.0099914 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.102 8
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.24 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=589.759
165ER2 G EKC=0.0081 7
165ERS G KC=0.00845 12$LC=0.001201 17$MC=0.000265 4
165ERS G NC=6.18E-5 9$OC=8.97E-6 13$PC=5.06E-7 7
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0159 {I5}
165ER G 892.79 7 0.078 10M1 0.0081411
165ER2 G EKC=0.0075 12
165ERS G KC=0.00689 10$LC=0.000976 14$MC=0.0002152 30
165ERS G NC=5.02E-5 7$OC=7.30E-6 10$PC=4.12E-7 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.028 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0040 {I3}
165ER L 1416.72 5 3/2-
165ER E 0.116 97.32 +5-4 0.116 9
165ERS E CK=0.7201 19$CL=0.2081 12$CM+=0.0718 5
165ER G 416.88 10 0.056 7 [E1] 0.0084312
165ER2 G %IG=0.0199 26
165ERS G KC=0.00714 10$LC=0.001010 14$MC=0.0002223 31
165ERS G NC=5.15E-5 7$OC=7.30E-6 10$PC=3.78E-7 5
165ER G 827.43 7 0.121 14M1 0.0098114 C
165ER2 G %IG=0.043 5
165ER cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Uncertainty in E|g increased to
165ER2cG 0.28 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=589.882
165ER2 G EKC=0.0091 15
165ERS G KC=0.00830 12$LC=0.001179 17$MC=0.000260 4
165ERS G NC=6.07E-5 8$OC=8.82E-6 12$PC=4.97E-7 7
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0141 {I5}
165ER G 1339.39 6 0.058 10[E2] 1.90E-3 3 &
165ERF G FL=77.258
165ER2 G EKC=0.0021 10
165ERS G KC=0.001584 22$LC=0.0002292 32$MC=5.06E-5 7
165ERS G NC=1.177E-5 16$OC=1.689E-6 24$PC=9.03E-8 13$IPC=2.68E-5 4
165ER2 G %IG=0.021 4
165ER G 1416.80 10 0.090 4E2 1.73E-3 2
165ER2 G EKC=0.00156 23
165ERS G KC=0.001424 20$LC=0.0002043 29$MC=4.51E-5 6
165ERS G NC=1.049E-5 15$OC=1.507E-6 21$PC=8.11E-8 11$IPC=4.65E-5 7
165ER2 G %IG=0.0320 20
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00095 {I12}
165ER L 1427.411 10 3/2+
165ER E 7.0 45.46 4 7.0 4
165ERS E CK=0.7083 22$CL=0.2166 14$CM+=0.0752 6
165ER G 573.882 12 0.97 4M1+E2 1.2 4 0.0169 26 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0140 17 (1982Vy03) $
165ERS G NC=0.000117 13$OC=1.65E-5 20$PC=8.2E-7 15
165ER2 G %IG=0.344 20
165ERS G KC=0.0140 23$LC=0.00225 25$MC=0.00050 5
165ER CG $K:L1:L2=545:100:LE 23 (1970Ab18)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.095 {I10}
165ER G 837.646 23 1.37 4 M1 0.0095213 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.0073 5
165ERS G KC=0.00806 11$LC=0.001144 16$MC=0.0002523 35
165ERS G NC=5.88E-5 8$OC=8.55E-6 12$PC=4.82E-7 7
165ER2 G %IG=0.486 25
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0676 {I20}
165ER G 908.26 11 0.060 15M1+E2 1.0 +22-7 0.0060 15
165ER2 G EKC=0.0050 13
165ER2 G %IG=0.021 6
165ERS G KC=0.0050 13$LC=0.00074 17$MC=0.00016 4
165ERS G NC=3.8E-5 9$OC=5.5E-6 13$PC=2.9E-7 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.021 6
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00202 {I18}
165ER G 920.24 8 0.114 10E2 0.00399 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.041 4
165ER cG $Uncertainty in E|g increased to 0.16 keV for least-squares fitting.
165ERF G FL=507.421
165ER2 G EKC=0.0032 5
165ERS G KC=0.00333 5$LC=0.000520 7$MC=0.0001160 16
165ERS G NC=2.69E-5 4$OC=3.80E-6 5$PC=1.893E-7 27
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0025 {I3}
165ER G 949.78 7 0.164 6 [E1] 1.51E-3 2
165ER2 G EKC=0.00257 23
165ER2 G %IG=0.0582 33
165ERS G KC=0.001285 18$LC=0.0001737 24$MC=3.80E-5 5
165ERS G NC=8.84E-6 12$OC=1.275E-6 18$PC=7.03E-8 10
165ER cG M$|a(K)exp close to |a(K)(E2)=0.00312 disagrees with
165ER2cG mult=E1 from level scheme
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00286 {I18}
165ER G 1043.05 4 0.218 6E1 1.27E-3 2
165ER2 G EKC=0.00140 17
165ERS G KC=0.001080 15$LC=0.0001454 20$MC=3.18E-5 4
165ERS G NC=7.40E-6 10$OC=1.068E-6 15$PC=5.92E-8 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.077 4
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00207 {I21}
165ER G 1070.80 12 0.033 5 [E1] 1.21E-3 2
165ER2 G %IG=0.0117 19
165ERS G KC=0.001029 14$LC=0.0001384 19$MC=3.03E-5 4
165ERS G NC=7.04E-6 10$OC=1.017E-6 14$PC=5.65E-8 8
165ER G 1131.26 3 4.86 22E1 1.10E-3 2 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.00106 8
165ERS G KC=0.000932 13$LC=0.0001250 18$MC=2.74E-5 4
165ERS G NC=6.36E-6 9$OC=9.19E-7 13$PC=5.12E-8 7$IPC=4.42E-6 6
165ER2 G %IG=1.73 11
165ER cG MR$-0.72<|d(M2/E1)<-0.45 from |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0345 {I11}
165ER G 1184.45 3 8.3 4E1 1.02E-3 1 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.00097 7
165ERS G KC=0.000858 12$LC=0.0001149 16$MC=2.515E-5 35
165ERS G NC=5.85E-6 8$OC=8.45E-7 12$PC=4.72E-8 7$IPC=1.682E-5 24
165ER2 G %IG=2.95 19
165ER cG MR$+0.19 {I7} (E1+M2) from |g|g(|q) (1988Ul02)
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0543 {I14}
165ER G 1364.75 3 0.184 5E2 1.84E-3 3 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.00178 15
165ERS G KC=0.001529 21$LC=0.0002205 31$MC=4.87E-5 7
165ERS G NC=1.133E-5 16$OC=1.625E-6 23$PC=8.71E-8 12$IPC=3.27E-5 5
165ER2 G %IG=0.0653 33
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00224 {I14}
165ER G 1380.21 3 1.09 7M1 0.00288 4 C
165ER2 G EKC=0.00268 23
165ERS G KC=0.002410 34$LC=0.000337 5$MC=7.41E-5 10
165ERS G NC=1.728E-5 24$OC=2.515E-6 35$PC=1.429E-7 20$IPC=4.43E-5 6
165ER2 G %IG=0.387 30
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0198 {I7}
165ER G 1427.40 4 2.27 15E1
165ER2 G EKC=0.00068 6
165ERS G NC=4.19E-6 6$OC=6.07E-7 8$PC=3.41E-8 5$IPC=0.0001466 21
165ER2 G %IG=0.81 6
165ERS G CC=0.000872 12$KC=0.000620 9$LC=8.24E-5 12$MC=1.802E-5 25
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.0104 {I4}
165ER L 1528.12 6 (3/2+)
165ER E 0.083 55.98 6 0.083 5
165ERS E CK=0.061 26$CL=0.664 17$CM+=0.274 7
165ER G 1231.86 11 0.081 7 [E1]
165ER2 G %IG=0.0288 28
165ERS G CC=0.000973 14$KC=0.000801 11$LC=0.0001070 15$MC=2.342E-5 33
165ERS G NC=5.45E-6 8$OC=7.88E-7 11$PC=4.40E-8 6$IPC=3.56E-5 5
165ER G 1285.22 6 0.154 6(E1) C
165ER2 G EKC=0.00115 13
165ERS G NC=5.05E-6 7$OC=7.30E-7 10$PC=4.09E-8 6$IPC=6.01E-5 8
165ER2 G %IG=0.0547 32
165ERS G CC=0.000930 13$KC=0.000743 10$LC=9.92E-5 14$MC=2.169E-5 30
165ER cG $Ice(K)=0.00120 {I11}