164DY    164HO EC DECAY (28.8 M)       1973KAZW,1972DR04         18NDS    201712
164DY  H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH AND JUN CHEN{+#}$CIT=NDS 147, 1 (2018)$
164DY2 H CUT=30-Nov-2017$
164DY C  G, K-x ray: 1973KAZW, 1972DR04, 1968DA23, 1966JO07. Others:
164DY2C  1972KA19, 1971PA02, 1966SE07, 1957MI67, 1954BR96
164DY C  I(B+)/I(B-)<5E-4 (1954BR96)
164DY C  CE: 1966JO07, 1957MI67, 1954BR96
164DY C  Measurements of half-life of {+164}Ho decay: 1972KA19, 1972DR04,
164DY2C  1966JO07, 1966SE07, 1961WE02, 1954HA19, 1954BR96, 1950WI13, 1950WA12,
164DY3C  1938PO05. See Also {+164}Ho Adopted Levels
164DY C  I(EC)(to 73 level)/I(B-)(to 91 level in 164ER)=1.49 11 (calculated
164DY2C  from data of 1973KAZW).
164DY3D  THIS VALUE IS TAKEN FROM CALCULATION IN 1974 NDS FOR A=164 (1974BU30)
164DY C  ^X-ray and G-ray intensities:
164DY C  I(XKA1, HO)=1000 (1973KAZW), 655 (1972DR04)
164DY C  I(XKA1, DY)=1280 25 (1973KAZW), 1356 (1972DR04)
164DY C  I(XKA1, ER)=76 2 (1973KAZW), 76 (1972DR04)
164DY C  I(73G in 164DY)=91 6 (1973KAZW), 81 (1972DR04)
164DY C  I(91G in 164ER)=127 8, 103 (1972DR04)
164DY cE $The decay scheme seems complete as RADLST code gives total energy
164DY3cE absorbed=575 keV {I70} as compared to Q(|e)|*%|e branch=578 keV {I48}
164DY CE IE(X)$Branch to 73 level is 31.4% 24 of total %EC=60 5 from 1973KaZW,
164DY2CE as deduced by 1974Bu30 (A=164 NDS evaluation in 1974)
164DY CG E(A)$From 1968DA23
164DY CG RI(A)$Very weak G (1973KAZW). LOGFT AP 7.7 (1973KAZW) implies
164DY2CG %EC AP 0.001 to 762 level, which in turn implies
164DY3CG RI(762)+RI(689) AP 0.055. RI(762)/RI(689)=0.90 10 (1968DA23)
164DY dG CC$ From BrIcc v2.3 (19-Sep-2012) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
164DY cL E$From E|g data
164DY cL J$ From Adopted Levels.
164HO  P 0.0         1+                28.8 M    5               961.4    14
164HO cP J,T$From {+164}Ho Adopted Levels
164HO cP QP$From 2017Wa10
164DY  N  0.0314   24          0.60    5 1.67
164DY CN NR$Branch to 73-keV level is 31.4% 24 of total %EC=60 5 from 1973KaZW,
164DY2CN from photon and XK intensities of 1973KAZW, as deduced in 1974Bu30
164DY3CN evaluation
164DY CN BR$%B-=40 5, %EC=60 5 (see 164HO B- decay and {+164}Ho Adopted Levels)
164DY PN                                  1.0                                3
164DY  L 0.0         0+
164DY  E                          41   6   4.6   1                          X
164DYS E CK=0.8273$CL=0.13317 3$CM+=0.039539 9
164DY  L 73.39       2+
164DY  E                          19   2   4.8   1                          X
164DYS E CK=0.8261$CL=0.13407 3$CM+=0.03986 1
164DY  G 73.392    5  100      E2                          8.89
164DY cG E$From Adopted Gammas
164DY2 G EKC=2.7 5 (1954Br96)$ EKC=3.15 25 (1966SE07)
164DYS G KC=2.15 3$LC=5.18 8$MC=1.245 18$
164DYS G NC=0.279 4$OC=0.0331 5$PC=9.41E-5 14
164DY CG M$from EKC and K:L:M=100:238:55 (1966JO07). Others: 1954BR96, 1957MI67
164DY  L 762.5     5 2+                                                        ?
164DY  E                         0.001 AP   7.6  AP                            ?
164DYS E CK=0.7524 14$CL=0.1883 10$CM+=0.0592 4
164DY CE IE$LOGFT AP 7.7 (1973KAZW) implies %EC AP 0.001
164DY  G 689.3     5  0.030  AP                                             A
164DY  G 762.4     5  0.025  AP                                             A