164ER    164HO B- DECAY (28.8 M)       1973KAZW,1966JO07,1954BR9618NDS    201712
164ER  H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH AND JUN CHEN{+#}$CIT=NDS 147, 1 (2018)$
164ER2 H CUT=30-Nov-2017$
164ER C  T1/2: 1972KA19, 1972DR04, 1966JO07. Others: 1966SE07, 1961WE02,
164ER2C  1954HA19, 1954BR96, 1950WI13, 1950WA12, 1938PO05
164ER C  G, K-x ray: 1973KAZW, 1972DR04, 1968DA23, 1966JO07. Others:
164ER2C  1972KA19, 1971PA02, 1966SE07, 1957MI67, 1954BR96
164ER C  B-, B+, BG coin: 1966SE07, 1954BR96. Others: 1966JO07, 1950WI13
164ER C  I(B+)/I(B-)<5E-4 (1954BR96)
164ER C  BG(T): 1968SE02, 1963FO02, 1954BR96
164ER C  GG: 1973KAZW, 1966SE07, 1954BR96.
164ER C  CE: 1966JO07, 1957MI67, 1954BR96
164ER C  I(EC) (73 level in 164DY)/I(B-) to 91 level=1.49 11 (calculated
164ER2C  by 1974BU30 from data of 1973KAZW)
164ER C  ^X-ray and G-ray intensities:
164ER C  I(XKA1, HO)=1000 (1973KAZW), 655 (1972DR04)
164ER C  I(XKA1, DY)=1280 25 (1973KAZW), 1356 (1972DR04)
164ER C  I(XKA1, ER)=76 2 (1973KAZW), 76 (1972DR04)
164ER C  I(73G in 164DY)=91 6 (1973KAZW), 81 (1972DR04)
164ER C  I(91G in 164ER)=127 8, 103 (1972DR04)
164ER cB $The decay scheme is complete from total energy absorbed=384 keV {I38}
164ER2cB (from RADLST code) as compared to Q(|b{+-})|*%|b{+-} branching
164ER3cB ratio=384 keV {I48}
164ER CB IB$From %B-=40 5 and I(B-) (to 91 level)/I(B-)=0.31
164ER2CB from I(CE)(91G)/I(B-)=25.1 (1966JO07) and CC(91G)=4.2
164ER cL E$From E|g data
164ER cL J$From Adopted Levels
164HO  P 0.0         1+                28.8 M    5               961.4    14
164HO cP J,T$From {+164}Ho Adopted Levels
164HO CP QP$from 2017Wa10
164ER  N 0.058                 0.40    5 2.5
164ER CN NR$I(B-) to 91 level is deduced as 31% of total B- decay from
164ER2CN I(CE)(91G)/I(B-)=25.1 (1966JO07) and CC(91G)=4.15
164ER CN BR$%B+%EC=60 5, %B-=40 5, from I(XK) and IG of 1973KAZW,
164ER2CN I(CE) of 1966JO07, and CC values (for 73G and 91G); see earlier
164ER3CN evaluation by 1974BU30 for details.
164ER PN                                                                     3
164ER  L 0.0         0+
164ER  B             28      5             5.5   1
164ERS B EAV=321.65 55
164ER CB E$965 20 (1966SE07), 990 30 (1954BR96).
164ER CB IB$100 (1966SE07)
164ER  L 91.39     3 2+                1.47 NS    5
164ER CL T$BG(T). Weighted average of 1.4 NS 5 (1954BR96),
164ER2CL 1.43 NS 5 (1963FO02), 1.52 NS 6 (1968SE02). Other: 1963DE21.
164ER  B             12      2             5.7   1
164ERS B EAV=286.13 54
164ER CB E$875 20 (1966SE07), AP 900 (1954BR96).
164ER CB IB$60 20 (1966SE07)
164ER  G 91.39     3 100       E2                       4.15
164ER cG E$from Adopted Gammas
164ER CG $EKC=1.31 11 (1968BO37), EKC=1.25 9 (1973KAZW).
164ER cG $Measured I(ceK)=87, I(ceL)=104, I(ceM)=45 (1966Jo07);
164ER2cG these are intensities/1000 |b{+-} decays.
164ER3cG Total ce intensity=251/1000 |b{+-} decays, including 0.33(IceM)
164ER4cG for shells higher than M. Using |a=4.15, corresponding I|g=60,
164ER5cG giving I(|g+ce)(91.4 transition)=311/1000 |b{+-} decays or
164ER6cG 31.1% of total |b{+-} decays. Note that 1966Jo07 deduce 26%
164ER7cG from the same data, which seems incorrect.
164ERS G KC=1.314 19$LC=2.17 3$MC=0.528 8$
164ERS G NC=0.1194 17$OC=0.01397 20$PC=5.51E-5 8