162HO 162HO IT DECAY (67.0 M) 1999ISZZ 24NDS 202403
162HO H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 195, 1 (2024)$CUT=19-Sep-2023$
162HO D DATA SET COMPLETELY REVISED (APRIL, 2005) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE DATA
162HO2D FROM 1999IsZZ
162HO c 1999IsZZ: studied internal-conversion electrons using a constant-field
162HO2c magnetic spectrograph (resolution|?0.04%). Source material
162HO3c produced by proton bombardment of a Ta target followed by chemical
162HO4c purification. Report Ice from various subshells for four transitions,
162HO5c two of which are previously unreported.
162HO c 1974Vi05: Produced by {+162}Dy(d,2n) on an enriched target. ce and
162HO2c x-ray spectra measured with Si(Li) detector.
162HO c For other studies, see 1961Jo10, 1961Ha23. Also, 1978Sc10,
162HO2c 1973St22, 1973Ba21, 1971Wo09, 1969Ak01, 1965GrZZ, 1964Ma10, 1957Mi67.
162HO c Data are from 1999IsZZ, unless noted otherwise.
162HO D Experimental methods:
162HO D 1957Mi67: Produced by DY(P,XN) reaction; measured CE in spectrograph.
162HO D 1961Ha23: Produced by DY(P,XN) reaction; measured CE in spectrograph.
162HO D 1961Jo10: Produced by 159TB(A,N) reaction with EA = 20 MeV and chemical
162HO2D separation. CE and CE-G coincidences measured with magnetic
162HO3D spectrometer.
162HO D 1964Ma10: Produced by DY(P,XN) reaction and measured isomer half-life.
162HO D 1965GrZZ: Lab report. Produced by spallation of Ta target with protons
162HO2D CE electrons measured. EG = 38.38 & 59.03 from L1 lines.
162HO D 1965St08: No data for isomer decay. Ground-state half-life measured
162HO2D from 511-keV photons with NaI detector after chemical separation.
162HO D 1969Ak01: Produced by 162DY(P,N) reaction; measured isomer half-life.
162HO D 1969Ek01: Produced by DY(P,XN) reactions. J measured by
162HO2D atomic-beam magnetic resonance.
162HO D 1971Wo09: Produced by 159TB(A,N) reaction; measured isomer half-life.
162HO D 1973Ba21: Produced by 162DY(P,N) reaction; measured isomer half-life.
162HO D 1973St22: Produced as recoil from 11.5-GeV protons on uranium with
162HO2D chemical separation. G's measured with Ge detector. Half-life
162HO3D reported without an uncertainty.
162HO D 1977AnZG: Lab report on level lifetime, see 1978Sc10 for published vers
162HO D 1978Sc10: Produced by spallation of Ta target with 660-MeV protons with
162HO2D chemical and isotope separation. Level half-life measured by
162HO3D coincidence between G detector and magnetic spectrometer for CE.
162HO D 1988NeZZ: Produced by spallation of Ta target; measured J by collinear
162HO2D fast-beam laser spectroscopy.
162HO cL E From a least-squares fit to the listed |g-ray energies. The
162HO2cL uncertainties are given to only the nearest 0.01 keV.
162HO cL J From {+162}Ho Adopted Levels.
162HO CL BAND(A) KPI=1+ band. CONF=(|p 7/2[523])-(|n 5/2[523])
162HO CL BAND(B) KPI=6- BANDHEAD. CONF=(|p 7/2[523])+(|n 5/2[642]) with a
162HO2cL mixture of configuration=(|p 7/2[523])+(|n 3/2[651]).
162HO P 105.87 6 6- 67.0 M 7
162HO N 1.00 1.00 0.63 AP
162HO cN BR$from evaluator's analysis based on Ice(L)(38.34)/Ice(K)(184.99)
162HO2cN ratio measured by 1961Jo10, with 38.34|g in {+162}Ho IT decay (67 min)
162HO2cN scheme and 184.99|g in {+162}Ho |e decay (67.0 min) scheme,
162HO2cN giving %IT=63 and %|e+%|b{++}=37.
162HO2cN These values are also reproduced using
162HO2cN Ice(L+M+N)(38.34)/Ice(K+L+M+N)(184.99) from 1961Jo10.
162HO2cN One can use data from 1961Ha23 to estimate %IT and %|e+%|b{++} from the
162HO2cN same ratios but more scattered results are obtained, reason for which
162HO2cN only the results based on 1961Jo10 data are adopted here.
162HO dN BR$By NN
162HO2dN Based on getting %IT and %(EC+B+ ) from measured Ice(subshells)
162HO2dN by calculating the of I(38g+ce)(IT)+I(184g+ce)(EC+B+)=100%
162HO2dN where 38g and 184g are taking all intensity for IT and EC+B+,
162HO2dN respectively, as seen in the level scmes.
162HO2dN Using 57g instead of 38g give discrepant %IT and %(EC+B+)
162HO2dN compared with 38g.
162HO2dN I used Ice(shells)/Ice(total) and |a/(1+|a) ratios to get from
162HO2dN Ice(shells) to I(g+ce).
162HO2dN Finally I adopted 0.63+0.37, compared with 0.62+0.38 by 2007Re16
162HO2dN as well as 1999He21 previous evaluations, but obtained from
162HO2dN 57g and 184g, which makes no sense with 0.21+0.79 I got now.
162HO2dN Did previous evalutions also used 38g but reported 57g instead?
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961JO01 0.24 Tce :=6.88/7.88I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it Lce 395 0.682 579 0.873 663 0.62
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec (K+L+M+N)ce 95 0.998 95.2 0.235 405 0.38
162HO2dN :=0.307/1.3 1069 1.0000
162HO2dN 0.3064:=0.2+0.0826+0.0194+0.00438
162HO2dN 0.3069:=0.2+0.0826+0.0194+0.00494
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961Ha23 0.38 I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it Lce 1500 0.682 2199 0.873 2519 0.51
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec (K+L+M+N)ce 565 0.998 566 0.235 2410 0.49
162HO2dN 4929 1.0000
162HO2dN
162HO2dN ================================================================
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961JO01 0.16 Tce I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it (L+M+N)ce 610 0.994 614 0.873 703 0.63
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec (K+L+M+N)ce 95 0.998 95.2 0.235 405 0.37
162HO2dN 1108 1.0000
162HO2dN 0.3064 0.868:=0.682+0.151+0.035
162HO2dN 0.3069 0.8733:=0.682+0.151+0.0403
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961Ha23 0.29 I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it (L+M)ce 1930 0.954 2023 0.873 2317 0.49
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec (K+L+M+N)ce 565 0.998 566 0.235 2410 0.51
162HO2dN 4727 1.0000
162HO2dN 0.833
162HO2dN 0.8733
162HO2dN
162HO2dN ================================================================
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961JO01 0.15 Tce I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it Lce 395 0.682 579 0.873 663 0.63
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec Kce 59 0.651 91 0.235 386 0.37
162HO2dN 1049 1.0000
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961Ha23 0.23 I(g+ce)
162HO2dN 38.5g in it Lce 1500 0.682 2199 0.873 2519 0.53
162HO2dN 184.8g in ec Kce 340 0.651 522 0.235 2222 0.47
162HO2dN 4741 1.0000
162HO2dN
162HO2dN ================================================================
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961JO01 0.79 Tce :=12.63/13.63
162HO2dN 57g Lce 75 0.775 97 0.927 104 0.21
162HO2dN 185g Kce 59 0.651 91 0.235 386 0.79
162HO2dN
162HO2dN 1961Ha23 0.78 490
162HO2dN 57g Lce 435 0.775 561 0.927 606 0.21
162HO2dN 185g Kce 340 0.651 522 0.235 2222 0.79
162HO2dN 2828
162HO2dN
162HO PN 3
162HO L 0 1+ 15.0 M 10 A
162HO cL T from {+162}Ho Adopted Levels.
162HO L 38.335 18 2+ 1.2 NS 2 A
162HO cL T from 1978Sc10.
162HO DL T the same datum, 1.2 NS, is given in 1977AnZG.
162HO G 38.34 2 12.7 11 M1 6.88 100 9
162HOS G L/T=0.682 6$M/T=0.151 3$N+/T=0.0403 8
162HOS G N/T=0.0350 7$O/T=0.00507 10$P/T=0.000283 6
162HO2 G %IG AP 8.0
162HO cG RI$weighted average of:
162HO2cG 12.7 {I14}, from Ice(L1)=61.5 {I70} and |a(L1)=4.85 {I7};
162HO2cG 12.8 {I27}, from Ice(L2)=5.7 {I12} and |a(L2)=0.446 {I7}; and
162HO2cG 12.5 {I21}, from Ice(L3)=0.91 {I15} and |a(L3)=0.0726 {I11}
162HO2cG (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ
162HO2cG and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc)
162HO cG M,MR$from L-subshell ratios. The evaluator computes, at the 1|s
162HO2cG level, the uncertainty in |d(E2/M1) to be <0.043. Note that
162HO3cG 1999IsZZ quote %E2=0.21 {I12} for this transition.
162HO L 96.071 21 3+ A
162HO G 57.74 2 7.1 6 M1 12.63 97 8
162HOS G K/T=0.775 6$L/T=0.1181 22$M/T=0.0261 5$N+/T=0.00699 14
162HOS G N/T=0.00606 12$O/T=0.000880 17$P/T=4.91E-5 10
162HO2 G %IG AP 4.5
162HO cG RI$weighted average of:
162HO2cG 7.3 {I9}, from Ice(L1)=10.7 {I13} and |a(L1)=1.459 {I21};
162HO2cG 7.0 {I10}, from Ice(L2)=0.92 {I13} and |a(L2)=0.1310 {I19}; and
162HO2cG 6.7 {I14}, from Ice(L3)=0.14 {I3} and |a(L3)=0.0209 {I3}
162HO2cG (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ
162HO2cG and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc)
162HO cG M,MR from L-subshell ratios. The evaluator computes, at the 1|s
162HO2cG level, the uncertainty in |d(E2/M1) to be <0.023. 1974Vi05 report
162HO3cG |d<0.084. However, 1999IsZZ quote %E2=0.29 {I18} for this transition.
162HO G 96.06 3 0.131 15 E2 3.28 0.56 7
162HOS G KC=1.210 17$LC=1.591 23$MC=0.384 6$NC+=0.0968 14
162HOS G NC=0.0865 13$OC=0.01026 15$PC=5.01E-5 7
162HO2 G %IG AP 0.083
162HO cG RI$weighted average of:
162HO2cG 0.124 {I25}, from Ice(L1)=0.15 {I3} and |a(L1)=1.210 {I17};
162HO2cG 0.135 {I27}, from Ice(L2)=0.10 {I2} and |a(L2)=0.741 {I11}; and
162HO2cG 0.135 {I27}, from Ice(L3)=0.10 {I2} and |a(L3)=0.739 {I11}
162HO2cG (with Ice(L1), Ice(L2) Ice(L3) measured by 1999IsZZ
162HO2cG and |a(L1), |a(L2), |a(L3) calculated by code BrIcc)
162HO cG M from relative intensities of K, L2, L3 conversion lines
162HO L 105.87 6 6- 67.0 M 7 BM
162HO cL E from a least-squares fit to the listed |g-ray energies.
162HO cL T from {+162}Ho Adopted Levels.
162HO G 9.80 5 1.90E-623 E3 4.77E+7 7 100
162HO2 G %IG AP 1.2E-6
162HO cG RI$calculated with the formula
162HO2cG I|g=[Ice(M2)+Ice(M3)+Ice(N2,3)]/[|a(M2)+|a(M3)+|a(N2)+|a(N3)], using
162HO2cG Ice(M2)=10 {I2}, Ice(M3)=10 {I2}, Ice(N2,3)=4.5 {I7} (1999IsZZ) and
162HO2cG |a(M2)=4.32|*10{+6} {I16}, |a(M3)=6.10|*10{+6} {I22},
162HO2cG |a(N2)=1.04|*10{+6} {I4}, |a(N3)1.44|*10{+6} {I6} (code BrIcc)
162HO2dG |a(M2)=4320000 {I160000}, |a(M3)=6100000 {I220000},
162HO2dG |a(N2)=1040000 {I40000}, |a(N3)=1440000 {I60000} (code BrIcc)
162HO dG RI$also 1.84 {I20}, weighted average of:
162HO2dG 2.3|*10{+-6} {I5}, from Ice(M2)=10 {I2} and |a(M2)=4.32|*10{+6} {I16};
162HO2dG 1.7|*10{+-6} {I3}, from Ice(M3)=10 {I2} and |a(M3)=6.10|*10{+6} {I22};
162HO2dG and
162HO2dG 1.8|*10{+-6} {I3}, from Ice(N2,N3)=4.5 {I7} and
162HO2dG |a(N2)=1.04|*10{+6} {I4}, |a(N3)1.44|*10{+6} {I6}.
162HO cG M$from Ice(M2)/Ice(M3)/Ice(N2,N3)=10 {I2}/10 {I2}/4.5 {I7} (1999IsZZ);
162HO cG CC$computed using RAINE (2002Ba85).
162HO3cG Since E|g lies so close to the L1 and L2 subshell
162HO3cG binding energies, |a cannot be reliably calculated by standard
162HO3cG BrIcc code, reason for which RAINE computer code package was used.
162HO cG TI$I(|g+ce)=90 {I11} calculated from I|g and |a, which covers the
162HO2cG expected I(|g+ce)=100.