160TM 160YB EC DECAY (4.8 M) 1978AD03 21NDS 202108
160TM H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 176, 1 (2021)$CUT=1-May-2021$
160TM D DATA SET UPDATED (OCTOBER, 2004) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE NEW QP VALUE,
160TM2D RECALCULATED LOGFT VALUES, JPI VALUE, AND RELATED COMMENTS.
160TM c Source produced in 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta and Hf targets
160TM2c followed by mass separation. Measured E|g, I|g, E(ce), Ice, prompt
160TM3c and delayed |g|g, |gce. Plastic, Ge(Li) detectors, magnetic lens |b
160TM4c spectrometer.
160TM cG M From relative I|g and Ice values, normalized so that
160TM2cG |a(L1)+|a(L2)=8.8 for the 42 |g.
160TM cG E(A) Assignment to {+160}Yb decay uncertain.
160TM cG RI I(K|a{-1}| x ray)=129 {I9}, relative to I|g(173.7|g)=100
160TM cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data
160TM cL J From Adopted Levels
160TM DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
160TM DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
160TM2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
160YB P 0.0 0+ 4.8 M 2 2140 30
160YB cP QP$From 2021Wa16
160TM N 0.43 4 0.43 4 1.00
160TM PN 3
160TM cN NR Listed value was calculated by the evaluator assuming a g.s.
160TM2cN |e+|b{++} branch of 1.5% {I15}. This value was deduced from the
160TM3cN requirement that log| {Ift} for the first-forbidden |e+|b{++}
160TM4cN transition to the g.s. be |>5.9, which implies that this intensity be
160TM5cN |<3%. 1978Ad03 report an upper limit of |?25% for this direct g.s.
160TM6cN feeding, inferred from their measured K| x ray intensity and the
160TMxcN intensity balance in {+160}Tm.
160TM G 94.29 7 0.92 8
160TM2 G %IG=0.39 5
160TM G 155.76 7 1.7 2
160TM2 G %IG=0.73 11
160TM G 278.0 3 1.0 2 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.43 10
160TM G 356.9 5 0.74 20 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.32 9
160TM G 366.2 3 1.05 25 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.45 12
160TM G 386.30 20 3.0 3
160TM2 G %IG=1.28 17
160TM G 395.16 25 1.61 23
160TM2 G %IG=0.69 12
160TM G 429.0 4 1.2 3 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.51 14
160TM G 465.2 4 1.4 3 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.60 14
160TM G 563.1 3 1.8 4
160TM2 G %IG=0.77 18
160TM G 588.7 3 1.50 35 A
160TM2 G %IG=0.64 16
160TM L 0.0 1- 9.4 M 3
160TM cL T$adopted value; 9.2 min {I4} from 1970De13 and 1970DeZF (this dataset)
160TM E 0.05 5 1.4 14 6.1 5 1.5 15
160TMS E EAV=513 14$CK=0.799 3$CL=0.1262 5$CM+=0.03791 16
160TM L 42.10 5 2- 1.6 NS 3
160TM cL T delayed |gce (1978Ad03)
160TM G 42.02 10 7.3 6M1+E2 0.31 3 17.1 20 C
160TM2 G %IG=3.12 24
160TMS G LC=13.2 16$MC=3.1 4
160TMS G NC=0.71 9$OC=0.088 10$PC=0.00185 4
160TM cG M,MR$based on |a deduced from intensity balance at 42 level
160TM3cG and relative ce intensity ratios L1:L2:L3=33:31:30 (1978Ad03)
160TM L 99.43 4 1(-)
160TM E 0.072 13 2.6 4 5.76 7 2.7 4
160TMS E EAV=469 14$CK=0.8072 22$CL=0.1277 5$CM+=0.03838 14
160TM G 99.46 5 2.1 1[M1] 3.15 C
160TM2 G %IG=0.90 9
160TMS G KC=2.64 4$LC=0.400 6$MC=0.0891 13
160TMS G NC=0.0208 3$OC=0.00300 5$PC=0.0001620 23
160TM L 140.33 4 0+,1+,2+
160TM G 98.24 5 2.8 2[E1] 0.350
160TM2 G %IG=1.20 13
160TMS G KC=0.289 4$LC=0.0470 7$MC=0.01048 15
160TMS G NC=0.00240 4$OC=0.000318 5$PC=1.287E-5 18
160TM G 140.35 5 22.2 10E1 0.1360
160TM2 G %IG=9.5 9
160TMS G KC=0.1135 16$LC=0.01759 25$MC=0.00391 6
160TMS G NC=0.000901 13$OC=0.0001219 18$PC=5.31E-6 8
160TM cG $I{-ce(K)}<2.5 (1978Ad03)
160TM L 174.38 5 1+ 17 NS 1
160TM cL T delayed |gce (1978Ad03)
160TM E 0.1 1 7 3 5.31 19 7 3
160TMS E EAV=436 14$CK=0.8121 19$CL=0.1287 4$CM+=0.03870 13
160TM G 34.18 10 3.1 5M1 11.69 20
160TM2 G %IG=1.33 21
160TMS G LC=9.11 15$MC=2.03 4
160TMS G NC=0.475 8$OC=0.0682 12$PC=0.00368 6
160TM G 132.23 5 14.0 7E1 0.1593 C
160TM2 G %IG=6.0 6
160TMS G KC=0.1328 19$LC=0.0207 3$MC=0.00461 7
160TMS G NC=0.001061 15$OC=0.0001430 20$PC=6.16E-6 9
160TM cG $I{-ce(K)}<1.8 (1978Ad03)
160TM G 174.40 10 13.2 15E1 0.0767 C
160TM2 G %IG=5.6 8
160TMS G KC=0.0643 9$LC=0.00975 14$MC=0.00217 3
160TMS G NC=0.000500 7$OC=6.84E-5 10$PC=3.09E-6 5
160TM L 215.84 4 1+ 0.65 NS 15
160TM cL T deduced from centroid shift in delayed |g|g (1978Ad03)
160TM E 1.4 2 79 8 4.23 5 80 8
160TMS E EAV=418 14$CK=0.8144 17$CL=0.1292 4$CM+=0.03886 12
160TM G 41.46 7 0.4 AP(M1+E2) 0.65 GE 92 46 40 AP S
160TM2 G %IG=0.17 8
160TMS G L/T=0.76 26$M/T=0.18 12
160TMS G N/T=0.042 29$O/T=0.0048 34$P/T=1.02E-5 84
160TMS G LC=70 36$MC=17.1 87
160TMS G NC=3.9 20$OC=0.44 22$PC=9.4E-4 62
160TM cG E from level-energy difference
160TM cG M,MR,RI 1978Ad03 have deduced I(|g+ce)|?40 based upon analysis of
160TM2cG their coincidence results. From this and their measured I(ce(L1)) they
160TM3cG deduced an E2 component of |>30%.
160TM cG $I{-ce(L1)}<3 (1978Ad03)
160TM G 116.44 5 1.96 16(E1) 0.223 C
160TM2 G %IG=0.84 10
160TMS G KC=0.185 3$LC=0.0294 5$MC=0.00654 10
160TMS G NC=0.001504 22$OC=0.000201 3$PC=8.45E-6 12
160TM G 173.74 6 100 4E1 0.0775 C
160TM2 G %IG=43 4
160TMS G KC=0.0649 10$LC=0.00985 14$MC=0.00219 3
160TMS G NC=0.000505 7$OC=6.90E-5 10$PC=3.12E-6 5
160TM G 215.78 6 48 2E1 0.0441 C
160TM2 G %IG=20.5 18
160TMS G KC=0.0370 6$LC=0.00553 8$MC=0.001226 18
160TMS G NC=0.000284 4$OC=3.91E-5 6$PC=1.83E-6 3
160TM cG $I{-ce(K)}<1.5 (1978Ad03)
160TM L 494.49 14 1+
160TM E 0.0087 20 1.93 24 5.70 6 1.94 24
160TMS E EAV=295 14$CK=0.8239 6$CL=0.13190 24$CM+=0.03972 8
160TM G 320.00 15 3.4 3
160TM2 G %IG=1.45 18
160TM G 354.6 3 1.1 2
160TM2 G %IG=0.47 10
160TM L 543.36 13 (1,2,3)+
160TM G 327.60 15 5.6 4 C
160TM2 G %IG=2.4 3
160TM L 547.38 11 1+
160TM E 0.014 3 4.3 5 5.32 6 4.3 5
160TMS E EAV=272 14$CK=0.8247 4$CL=0.13230 23$CM+=0.03985 8
160TM G 373.00 10 10.0 5 C
160TM2 G %IG=4.3 4
160TM L 605.37 13 1+
160TM E 0.012 5 5.7 16 5.17 13 5.7 16
160TMS E EAV=246 14$CK=0.8252 3$CL=0.13271 21$CM+=0.03999 8
160TM G 62.05 10 0.46 15(M1,E2) 16.6 45 C
160TM2 G %IG=0.20 7
160TMS G KC=6.0 42$LC=8.2 66$MC=2.0 17
160TMS G NC=0.45 37$OC=0.053 41$PC=3.8E-4 26
160TM cG M$if E1 intensity at 543 level cannot be balanced
160TM G 389.45 15 5.2 3 C
160TM2 G %IG=2.22 4
160TM L 797.96 21 1+
160TM E 1.29 21 5.69 8 1.29 21
160TMS E CK=0.8253 2$CL=0.13401 21$CM+=0.04044 8
160TM G 582.12 20 3.0 4
160TM2 G %IG=1.28 22