160DY 160TB B- DECAY 21NDS 202108
160DY H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 176, 1 (2021)$CUT=1-May-2021$
160DY D DATA SET UPDATED (FEBRUARY, 2004) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE SEVERAL NEW
160DY2D EG VALUES, REVISED QP VALUE, NEW PROPOSED GAMMAS, A REVISED MR VALUE
160DY3D FOR THE 872 G, RECOMPUTED LEVEL ENERGIES, AND ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
160DY c The decay scheme shown in the drawings is due primarily to 1968Lu10.
160DY tB $ Measured values of E|b and relative I|b include:
160DY tB $
160DY tB $ 1954Ke35 1957Na03 1959Gr93 1963Wu01
160DY+tB 1964Ha26
160DY tB $ E|b I|b E|b I|b E|b I|b E|b I|b
160DY+tB E|b I|b
160DY tB $ -------- --- -------- --- --------- --- -------- ---
160DY+tB -------- ---
160DY tB $ 280 {I40} 19 250 {I30} 12 274 {I30} 9
160DY tB $ 461 {I20} 19 455 {I20} 22 460 {I20} 18 464 {I20} 14
160DY tB $ 575 {I10} 42 565 {I10} 39 562 {I15} 42
160DY tB $ 858 {I10} 31 868 {I10} 34
160DY tB $
160DY+tB 1552 0.12 {I3}
160DY tB $ 1765 {I20} 0.4 1710 {I30} 0.4 1740 {I30} 0.4
160DY+tB {I1745} 0.34 {I4}
160DY cG 1991Go22 have measured the relative intensities of a number
160DY2cG of conversion-electron lines, using a precisely calibrated
160DY3cG mini-orange electron spectrometer. The uncertainties quoted for these
160DY4cG relative intensities range from |?3.7% for the strongest lines
160DY5cG to |?35% for the weakest. These data do not affect the multipolarity
160DY6cG assignments for the relevant |g rays to any significant extent and are
160DY7cG not given here.
160DY cG $2008Ya10 measured {+160}Dy L X-ray intensity ratios following decay
160DY2cG and photoionization
160DY cG RI Unless otherwise indicated, the listed |g-ray intensities
160DY2cG represent weighted averages of the values reported by 1983Ji01,
160DY3cG 1984Ch34, 1986Me07 and 1992Si23. For other studies in which precise I|g
160DY4cG values for {+160}Tb decay are reported, see, e.g., 1974La15 and
160DYxcG 1979Hn02.
160DY cG RI(B) Most studies report only I|g(1002+1005). The I|g values given
160DY2cG here for these two |g's are based on I|g(1002+1005)=3.579 {I13}
160DY3cG (weighted average of values from 1983Ji01, 1986Me07 and 1992Si23), and
160DY4cG the split in intensity between them reported by 1984Ch34.
160DY cG RI 1996Ch55 present an evaluation of I|g data for many of the
160DY2cG |g's in the {+160}Tb decay. However, they do not appear to have
160DY3cG included the data from 1992Si23 in their evaluation; and their results
160DY4cG are not incorporated here.
160DY cG E Weighted average of the data of 1968Lu10, 1970Ke07, and
160DY2cG 1972Mc10, unless noted otherwise.
160DY cG E(Q) Value recommended for |g-ray energy calibration purposes
160DY2cG by 2000He14.
160DY cG CC Theoretical values, calculated assuming the listed
160DY2cG multipolarities. For a number of the E1+M2 transitions, there is the
160DY3cG possibility of an E3 admixture as well. In these cases, the |a values
160DY4cG may be in error. Conversion coefficients have been measured for a
160DY5cG number of the |g transitions. These are not given here. See 1968Lu10,
160DY6cG for example, for such information. For a recent report of measured
160DY7cG |a values (mainly |a(K)exp), see 1994MiZY.
160DY cG There is an extensive volume of published work on the
160DY2cG mixing ratios of the |g rays emitted following the decay of {+160}Tb.
160DY3cG Not including those based solely on measured |a values, some of the
160DY4cG more recent (post-1970) publications in this field are: from the decay
160DY5cG of oriented {+160}Tb nuclei-- 1974Fo27, 1979Gr22, 1982Kr04, 1989Ma39;
160DY6cG from |g|g(|q) studies-- 1971Kr02, 1973Ga10, 1976Bh06, 1982Ha58,
160DY7cG 1984Si16, 1991Ma11, 1996Al02 (in conjunction with an IPAC-based
160DY8cG measurement of the g factor of the second excited state); and from
160DY9cG ce(K)-|g(|q)--1973Za04. An excellent discussion of these mixing ratios
160DYxcG appears in 1989Ma39.
160DY cG 1986AdZX observe the following |g rays, which they assign for
160DY2cG the first time to the decay of {+160}Tb: 53.51 (K| x ray?); 73.59;
160DY3cG 97.82; 99.72; 148.75; 320.50; 707.54; 728.27; 1265.3; 1358.7 and
160DY4cG 1556.6. With the exception of the 1556.6 |g, these transitions are not
160DY5cG incorporated into the present {+160}Dy level scheme.
160DY cG MR(K) The |d values determined from the nuclear-orientation
160DY2cG studies of 1989Ma39 differ considerably from those obtained from the
160DY3cG |g|g(|q) experiments. 1982Kr04 suggest that the differences in
160DY4cG the |d values from nuclear-orientation studies and from |g|g(|q)
160DY5cG experiments might be explained by including a small E3 admixture in
160DY6cG the E1+M2 transitions.
160DY cG MR(L) Both 1982Kr04 and 1989Ma39 point out that these transitions
160DY2cG may have sizeable E3 admixtures, their deduced E3/E1 mixing ratios
160DY3cG being larger than the M2/E1 ratios. As pointed out by 1989Ma39,
160DY4cG because of the relatively large errors associated with the |d values
160DY5cG from the |g|g(|q) data, definitive conclusions regarding E3
160DY6cG components in these transitions must await new, more precise
160DYxcG measurements.
160DY tG $
160DY tG $ I|g(x-ray) (relative to I|g(879.38|g)=100) (1986Me07)
160DY tG $ I(x-ray) I(x-ray)
160DY tG $ --------- ---------
160DY tG $ Dy L{-S} x ray 0.90 {I6} Dy K|a| x ray 53.0 {I7}
160DY tG $ Dy L{-|a} x ray+ Dy K|b{-1} x ray+
160DY tG $ Dy L| x ray(eta) 15.5 {I7} Dy K|b{-3} x ray 10.70 {I15}
160DY tG $ Dy L{-|b} x ray 14.9 {I6} Dy K|b{-2}'| x ray 2.76 {I6}
160DY tG $ Dy L{-|g} x ray 2.62 {I11} Dy K|b| x ray 13.50 {I17}
160DY cL E Calculated from a least-squares fit to the listed E|g values.
160DY cL J From Adopted Levels
160DY cL The K|p=1- and 2- bands are strongly Coriolis-mixed
160DYxcL (1968Gu06).
160DY CL BAND(A) GROUND-STATE BAND.
160DY CL BAND(B) GAMMA-VIBRATIONAL BAND.
160DY CL BAND(C) KPI=2- OCTUPOLE-VIBRATIONAL BAND.
160DY2cL The dominant two-quasiparticle component in this band has
160DY3cL configuration=(|p 7/2[523] - |p 3/2[411]).
160DY CL BAND(D) KPI=1- OCTUPOLE-VIBRATIONAL BAND.
160DY2cL The two-quasiparticle state with configuration=(|n 5/2[642] - |n
160DY3cL 3/2[521]) is the major component in the makeup of this band.
160DY DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
160DY DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
160DY2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
160TB P 0.0 3- 72.3 D 2 1836.0 11
160TB cP QP$From 2021Wa16
160DY N 0.301 6 1.0 1.0
160DY PN 3
160DY cN NR Value calculated by requiring that the sum of the I(|g+ce)
160DY2cN values of the four |g transitions feeding the g.s. be 100%.
160DY G 1.11 5 ?
160DY cG E deduced by 1995KaZX from low-energy conversion-electron
160DY2cG lines assigned as N-shell lines. |g placed by these authors between
160DY3cG the 1286.7, 3- level and the 1285.6, 1- level. This |g would then
160DY4cG have mult=E2. However, even assuming a reasonable upper limit for
160DY5cG the speed of this putative E2 (namely, that it is a "rotational"
160DY6cG one), the implied partial half-life is many orders of magnitude
160DY7cG larger than those of the other deexciting |g's. This suggests that
160DY8cG the decay of the initial state through this branch is negligibly
160DY9cG small. The evaluator has not adopted this placement and regards
160DYKcG this |g as questionable.
160DY G 10.05 25 ?
160DY cG E deduced by 1995KaZX from low-energy conversion-electron
160DY2cG lines assigned as L-shell lines. |g placed by these authors between
160DY3cG the 1285.6, 1- level and a 1275.5, 0+ level. However, the 0+ level
160DY4cG is located elsewhere, and no level is otherwise located at this
160DY5cG energy. The evaluator has not adopted this placement and regards
160DY6cG this |g as questionable.
160DY L 0.0 0+ STABLE A
160DY L 86.7877 3 2+ 2.02 NS 1 A
160DY cL T weighted average of: 2.03 ns {I2} (1972Lo01) |g|g(t);
160DY2cL 1.97 ns {I4} (1971Ab05) |b|g(t), (ce)(ce)(t), |gce(t);
160DY3cL 2.02 ns {I10} (1969Fo08) |g|g(t); 2.01 ns {I5} (1968Ku03)
160DY4cL |gce(t); 2.02 ns {I9} (1966Fu03) |gce(t);
160DY5cL 2.00 ns {I4} (the mean of three values reported by 1965Me08)
160DY6cL |b|g(t),|gce(t); 1.99 ns {I4} (1965Gu02) |g|g(t); 1.99 ns {I5}
160DY7cL (1963Li04) |bce(t); 1.92 ns {I5} (1963Fo02) |bce(t); 2.059 ns {I16}
160DY8cL (1963De21) |gce(t). Other: 1981Is14, 1970Mo39, 1964Do06, 1962Ri07,
160DYxcL 1960El07, 1952Mc03
160DY B 1.2 LT 11.4 GT
160DYS B EAV=651.02 48
160DY G 86.7877 3 43.7 4E2 4.63 QC
160DYS G KC=1.565 22$LC=2.35 4$MC=0.565 8
160DYS G NC=0.1266 18$OC=0.01511 22$PC=6.50E-5 9
160DY cG RI weighted average of 44.6 {I13} (1984Ch34), 43.3 {I3}
160DY2cG (1986Me07) and 44.5 {I5} (1992Si23) (1983Ji01 do not quote an I|g
160DY3cG value for this |g). 1992Si23 quote |DI|g=0.15, but this appears
160DY4cG unreasonably small as well as inconsistent with related values given
160DY5cG elsewhere in their paper. The evaluator has assigned an uncertainty of
160DY6cG 1% to the I|g value of these authors in carrying out the weighted
160DY7cG average. Others: 45 {I7} (1968Lu10), 43.2 {I23} (1970Ke07), 43.3 {I23}
160DY8cG (1972Mc10), 38.8 {I5} (1974La15), 46.3 {I7} (1979Hn02).
160DY L 283.8220 11 4+ 103 PS 5 A
160DY2 L G=+0.350 20
160DY cL G From 1996Al02, IPAC. This value is based on T{-1/2}=104.8 ps
160DY2cL {I25}, used by these authors in their analysis. This value is quite
160DY3cL close to that (104 ps {I4}) adopted in this evaluation.
160DY cL T weighted average of 101 ps {I9} (1971Ab05 |gce(t), |bce(t),
160DY2cL (ce)(ce)(t)), 95 ps {I10} (1970Mo39 |g|g(t)), 112 ps {I11} (1966Ay01
160DY3cL |g|g(t)), 107 ps {I15} (1963Li04 |gce(t), |bce(t)). Other: 1961Bu15
160DY B 0.15 5 12.09 15
160DYS B EAV=566.36 47
160DY G 197.0341 10 17.22 9E2 0.248 QC
160DYS G KC=0.1659 24$LC=0.0638 9$MC=0.01495 21
160DYS G NC=0.00338 5$OC=0.000426 6$PC=7.89E-6 11
160DY cG RI 1984Ch34 report I|g=19.23 {I37}. This value is quite
160DY2cG different from the other three values and has not been included in the
160DYxcG average.
160DY cG MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.024 {I8} for this transition.
160DY2cG This leads to B(M3)(W.u.) of the order of 3|*10{+7}, which is much
160DY3cG larger than the upper limit of 10 from RUL.
160DY L 581.1 7 6+ A
160DY G 297.3 0.031 16E2 0.0663 S
160DYS G KC=0.0496 7$LC=0.01297 19$MC=0.00299 5
160DYS G NC=0.000678 10$OC=8.91E-5 13$PC=2.58E-6 4
160DY cG E the 581.1 level, known to decay via a single branch with
160DY2cG E|g=297.24 {I8}, is populated in |b{+-} decay. The 297 |g, although
160DY3cG obscured in the |g-ray spectrum from {+160}Tb decay, must thus be
160DY4cG present. The listed value is from the level-energy difference.
160DY cG RI from intensity balance at the 581.1 level.
160DY cG M from adopted values
160DY L 966.1686 13 2+ B
160DY2 L G=+0.324 25
160DY cL G from 1995Al22, IPAC. The value, g=+0.317 {I12}, reported by
160DY2cL these authors has been adjusted by the evaluator to be consistent
160DY3cL with the somewhat different T{-1/2} value adopted here, namely
160DY4cL T{-1/2}=1.31 ps {I9}. (in their work, 1995Al22 use T{-1/2}=1.340 ps
160DY5cL {I25}.) Others: 0.28 {I4} (1969Si01, IPAC) and 0.27 {I10} (1975Kh03,
160DY6cL IPAC). In these latter two studies, the g factors were reported to be
160DY7cL 0.18 {I6} and 0.16 {I7}, respectively, based on the value T{-1/2}=2.1
160DY8cL ps {I6} for this level. The listed values were computed by the
160DYxcL evaluator using the adopted T{-1/2} value.
160DY cL T in their studies, 1975Kh03 and 1969Si01 use T{-1/2}=2.1 ps
160DY2cL {I6}, taken from B(E2)=0.069 {I20}, reported by 1965Yo04 in Coul. ex.
160DY3cL This is quite different from the value adopted in the present
160DY4cL evaluation (see {+160}Dy Adopted Levels). 1972Ab09 report T{-1/2}|<14
160DYxcL ps.
160DY B 28.1 6 8.891 10
160DYS B EAV=286.99 43
160DY G 682.31 4 1.98 3E2 0.00704 C
160DYS G KC=0.00581 9$LC=0.000962 14$MC=0.000214 3
160DYS G NC=4.91E-5 7$OC=6.94E-6 10$PC=3.32E-7 5
160DY cG MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.004 {I17} for this transition.
160DY2cG From RUL<10, one expects |d<0.001.
160DY G 879.378 2 100.0 2E2+M1 -16.6 5 0.00400 QC
160DYS G KC=0.00335 5$LC=0.000513 8$MC=0.0001132 16
160DYS G NC=2.61E-5 4$OC=3.73E-6 6$PC=1.93E-7 3
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -16.7 {I+13-16} (1982Kr04), -12.8
160DY2cG {I15} (1979Gr22), -18 {I+4-8} (1974Fo27), -14.5 {I15} (1976Bh06),
160DY3cG -16.3 {I13} (1973Ga10), -13.5 {I17} (1972Zu03), -11.5 {I19} (1971Kr02).
160DY G 966.166 2 83.4 4E2 0.00327 QC
160DYS G KC=0.00274 4$LC=0.000411 6$MC=9.05E-5 13
160DYS G NC=2.09E-5 3$OC=3.00E-6 5$PC=1.583E-7 23
160DY L 1049.1017 17 3+ B
160DY B 6.49 16 9.373 11
160DYS B EAV=255.22 42
160DY G 765.28 4 7.11 4E2+M1 -13.8 9 0.00544 C
160DYS G KC=0.00452 7$LC=0.000720 10$MC=0.0001595 23
160DYS G NC=3.67E-5 6$OC=5.21E-6 8$PC=2.60E-7 4
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -8.3 {I+7-9} (1982Kr04), -9.0
160DY2cG {I+24-50} (1979Gr22), -7.7 {I+6-7} (1974Fo27), -7 {I+5-20} (1971Kr02).
160DY G 962.311 3 32.6 3E2+M1 -13.8 3 0.00331 QC
160DYS G KC=0.00278 4$LC=0.000416 6$MC=9.17E-5 13
160DYS G NC=2.11E-5 3$OC=3.04E-6 5$PC=1.603E-7 23
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -11.0 {I12} (1982Kr04), -37 {I+17-109}
160DY2cG (from 1979Gr22, as recomputed by 1989Ma39), -8.4 {I+17-27} (1976Bh06),
160DY3cG -18 {I5} (1971Kr02).
160DY L 1155.812 21 4+ B
160DY B 0.214 6 10.634 13
160DYS B EAV=215.29 41
160DY G 872.03 6 0.723 12M1+E2 +5.0 +20-110.0041910 C
160DYS G KC=0.00351 9$LC=0.000536 11$MC=0.0001181 25
160DYS G NC=2.72E-5 6$OC=3.90E-6 9$PC=2.03E-7 6
160DY cG MR from {+160}Ho |e decay (25.6 min+5.02 h). 1989Ma39 report
160DY2cG |d=-0.95 {I+8-11}, but state that this value may be incorrect because
160DY3cG the |g is very weak and probably affected by the close-lying strong
160DY4cG 879 |g. Other: -0.70 {I30} (1979Gr22), but 1998Kr07 point out that the
160DY5cG second value of |d deduced from the data of 1979Gr22 is
160DY6cG +5.0 {I+24-13}.
160DY G 1069.09 5 0.332 5E2 0.00265 C
160DYS G KC=0.00223 4$LC=0.000328 5$MC=7.20E-5 10
160DYS G NC=1.659E-5 24$OC=2.39E-6 4$PC=1.290E-7 18
160DY cG MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M3/E2)=+0.02 {I4}. 1994SlZZ, from |g(|q)
160DY2cG on oriented {+160}Ho nuclei, report |d(M3/E2)=-0.079 {I21}. However,
160DY3cG from RUL, using reasonable estimates of B(E2) of the 1069 |g, the
160DY4cG evaluator concludes that |d(M3/E2) is probably less than 0.0013. See
160DY5cG the discussion on the 1069 |g in the {+160}Ho |e Decay (25.6 m+5.02 h)
160DY6cG data set.
160DY L 1264.7470 16 2- 10 PS LE C
160DY cL T from 1972Ab09
160DY B 45.4 10 8.047 10
160DYS B EAV=175.91 39
160DY G 215.6452 11 13.35 5E1 0.0399 KC
160DY3 G FLAG=Q
160DYS G KC=0.0337 5$LC=0.00486 7$MC=0.001063 15
160DYS G NC=0.000243 4$OC=3.44E-5 5$PC=1.721E-6 24
160DY cG MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.0046 {I53}. Others: -0.010 {I9}
160DY2cG (1982Kr04), +0.016 {I8} (1979Gr22), -0.003 {I6} (1974Fo27), -0.22 {I2}
160DY3cG (1984Si16), -0.18 {I10} (1971Kr02), -0.20 {I5} (1967Ja04). From RUL,
160DY4cG however, one expects |d<0.0021. This transition is assumed here to
160DYxcG be pure E1.
160DY G 298.5783 17 86.8 6E1 0.01740 KC
160DY3 G FLAG=L $ FLAG=Q
160DYS G KC=0.01475 21$LC=0.00208 3$MC=0.000455 7
160DYS G NC=0.0001044 15$OC=1.489E-5 21$PC=7.77E-7 11
160DY cG MR 1989Ma39 report |d(M2/E1)=+0.0188 {I24} for this |g. This
160DY2cG implies B(M2)(W.u.)|>6.6, which exceeds the RUL limit of 1. Other |d
160DY3cG values: -0.024 {I14} (1982Kr04), +0.023 {I18} (1979Gr22), -0.011 {I29}
160DY4cG (1974Fo27), +0.22 {I6} (1984Si16), -0.048 {I24} (1976Bh06), -0.021
160DYxcG {I7} (1973Ga10), +0.005 10 (1971Kr02).
160DY G 1177.954 3 49.4 2E1+M2 -0.0207 23 9.44E-4 KC
160DY3 G FLAG=L $ FLAG=Q
160DYS G KC=0.000795 12$LC=0.0001048 15$MC=2.27E-5 4
160DYS G NC=5.24E-6 8$OC=7.67E-7 11$PC=4.45E-8 7$IPC=1.557E-5 22
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.062 {I4} (1982Kr04), -0.015 {I8}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.031 {I12} (1974Fo27), +0.09 {I2} (1984Si16), +0.047
160DY3cG {I21} (1973Ga10), +0.02 {I2} (1971Kr02).
160DY L 1285.59 10 1- D
160DY B 0.0154 13 11.46 4
160DYS B EAV=168.54 39
160DY cB LOGFT from systematics, one expects log| {Ift}|>12.8 for a
160DY2cB |DJ|p=2, no transition.
160DY G 1285.58 10 0.051 4E1 8.55E-4
160DYS G KC=0.000678 10$LC=8.91E-5 13$MC=1.93E-5 3
160DYS G NC=4.46E-6 7$OC=6.53E-7 10$PC=3.80E-8 6$IPC=6.25E-5 9
160DY L 1286.694 24 3- C
160DY B 3.43 7 9.111 10
160DYS B EAV=168.15 39
160DY cB IB value computed assuming the split of |g intensity between the
160DY2cB 1002 and 1005 |g rays reported by 1984Ch34.
160DY G 237.64 9 0.020 7
160DY cG RI from 1984Ch34
160DY G 1002.88 4 3.45 2E1+M2 -0.013 9 1.24E-3 BC
160DYS G KC=0.001063 16$LC=0.0001411 21$MC=3.06E-5 5
160DYS G NC=7.06E-6 11$OC=1.032E-6 15$PC=5.93E-8 9
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.009 {I15} (1982Kr04), +0.094 {I21}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.004 {I17} (1974Fo27), -0.11 {I+10-11} (1984Si16),
160DYxcG +0.005 {I4} (1996Al02).
160DY G 1199.89 3 7.92 4E1+M2 -0.008 3 9.19E-4 C
160DYS G KC=0.000767 11$LC=0.0001010 15$MC=2.19E-5 3
160DYS G NC=5.05E-6 7$OC=7.40E-7 11$PC=4.29E-8 6$IPC=2.35E-5 4
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: +0.026 {I5} (1982Kr04), -0.050 {I11}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.017 {I8} (1974Fo27), -0.05 {I6} (1984Si16).
160DY L 1288.66 3 5+ B
160DY B 0.030 11 11.27 16 1U
160DYS B EAV=180.95 39
160DY cB IB value computed assuming the split of |g intensity between the
160DY2cB 1002 and 1005 |g's reported by 1984Ch34.
160DY G 239.7 6 0.007 3E2 0.1305 22
160DYS G KC=0.0928 15$LC=0.0292 5$MC=0.00679 12
160DYS G NC=0.00154 3$OC=0.000198 4$PC=4.62E-6 8
160DY cG E,RI from 1984Ch34
160DY cG M from {+160}Ho |e decay
160DY G 707.6 10 0.033 17E2 0.00647
160DYS G KC=0.00535 8$LC=0.000875 13$MC=0.000194 3
160DYS G NC=4.47E-5 7$OC=6.32E-6 10$PC=3.06E-7 5
160DY cG E,RI from 1984Ch34
160DY cG M from {+160}Ho |e decay
160DY G 1005.0 10 0.13 3M1+E2 +7.1 +8-10 0.00306 BC
160DYS G KC=0.00257 4$LC=0.000381 6$MC=8.37E-5 13
160DYS G NC=1.93E-5 3$OC=2.78E-6 5$PC=1.484E-7 23
160DY cG M,MR from {+160}Ho |e decay
160DY L 1358.666 4 2- 2.70 NS 14 D
160DY cL T from 1972Ab09
160DY B 9.92 20 8.444 10
160DYS B EAV=143.14 38
160DY G 93.919 6 0.188 6E2 3.43 C
160DYS G KC=1.307 19$LC=1.632 23$MC=0.391 6
160DYS G NC=0.0877 13$OC=0.01051 15$PC=5.40E-5 8
160DY G 309.561 15 2.867 12E1+M2 -0.013 7 0.0159825 C
160DYS G KC=0.01354 21$LC=0.00191 3$MC=0.000418 7
160DYS G NC=9.58E-5 16$OC=1.369E-5 22$PC=7.17E-7 12
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.025 {I25} (1982Kr04), -0.06 {I3}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.020 {I14} (1974Fo27).
160DY G 392.514 26 4.44 3E1+M2 +0.018 6 0.0090214 KC
160DYS G KC=0.00766 12$LC=0.001067 17$MC=0.000233 4
160DYS G NC=5.35E-5 9$OC=7.69E-6 12$PC=4.13E-7 7
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.016 {I16} (1982Kr04), -0.018 {I17}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.043 {I15} (1974Fo27), -0.07 (1984Si16), +0.005 {I70}
160DYxcG (1971Kr02).
160DY G 1271.873 5 24.73 7E1+M2 +0.0166 25 8.65E-4 K
160DY3 G FLAG=L $ FLAG=Q
160DYS G KC=0.000693 10$LC=9.11E-5 13$MC=1.97E-5 3
160DYS G NC=4.56E-6 7$OC=6.67E-7 10$PC=3.88E-8 6$IPC=5.58E-5 8
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.029 {I5} (1982Kr04), +0.026 {I9}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.003 {I12} (1974Fo27), +0.05 {I+3-2} (1984Si16), -0.003
160DY3cG {I26} (1973Ga10), -0.03 {I3} (1971Kr02).
160DY L 1386.436 19 4- C
160DY B 1.015 21 9.347 10
160DYS B EAV=133.70 38
160DY G 230.628 13 0.268 3(E1) 0.0335 C
160DYS G KC=0.0284 4$LC=0.00407 6$MC=0.000890 13
160DYS G NC=0.000204 3$OC=2.88E-5 4$PC=1.457E-6 21
160DY G 337.32 3 1.127 9E1+M2 +0.028 13 0.0131 4 C
160DYS G KC=0.0111 3$LC=0.00157 5$MC=0.000343 11
160DYS G NC=7.87E-5 24$OC=1.13E-5 4$PC=5.96E-7 19
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.006 {I33} (1982Kr04), +0.034 {I27}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), +0.039 {I32} (1974Fo27).
160DY G 1102.60 3 1.932 11E1+M2 +0.0049 12 1.04E-3 C
160DYS G KC=0.000892 13$LC=0.0001179 17$MC=2.56E-5 4
160DYS G NC=5.90E-6 9$OC=8.63E-7 12$PC=4.99E-8 7$IPC=1.86E-6 3
160DY cG RI average of three values. 1992Si23 do not report an I|g value
160DY2cG for this |g.
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.085 {I40} (1982Kr04), -0.013 {I46}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.156 {I25} (1974Fo27), +0.05 {I+14-17} (1984Si16),
160DYxcG -0.020 {I22} (1996Al02).
160DY G 1299.3 3 0.0181 18
160DY cG RI average of 0.0193 {I14} (1986Me07) and 0.0160 {I19}
160DY2cG (1992Si23) only. Values of 0.0051 {I19} (1983Ji01) and 0.030 {I3}
160DY3cG (1984Ch34) not included in this average.
160DY L 1398.940 23 3- D
160DY B 4.48 10 8.662 11
160DYS B EAV=129.49 37
160DY G 242.5 8 0.025 3
160DY G 349.92 11 0.048 3
160DY G 432.66 12 0.077 3
160DY G 1115.12 3 5.20 5E1(+M2) +0.001 3 1.02E-3 C
160DYS G KC=0.000874 13$LC=0.0001154 17$MC=2.50E-5 4
160DYS G NC=5.78E-6 8$OC=8.45E-7 12$PC=4.89E-8 7$IPC=2.87E-6 4
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.013 {I8} (1982Kr04), +0.011 {I14}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), 0.000 {I12} (1974Fo27), -0.002 {I+60-58} (1984Si16),
160DYxcG +0.010 {I4} (1996Al02).
160DY G 1312.14 4 9.51 12E1+M2 -0.015 3 8.42E-4 C
160DYS G KC=0.000656 10$LC=8.61E-5 12$MC=1.87E-5 3
160DYS G NC=4.31E-6 6$OC=6.31E-7 9$PC=3.67E-8 6$IPC=7.63E-5 11
160DY cG RI the four I|g values included in the average form two
160DY2cG distinct groupings, namely 9.35 {I4} (1983Ji01), 9.44 {I4} (1986Me07)
160DY3cG and 9.87 {I20} (1984Ch34), 9.86 {I5} (1992Si23).
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: +0.013 {I6} (1982Kr04), -0.045 {I11}
160DY2cG (1979Gr22), -0.017 {I8} (1974Fo27), +0.19 {I+7-5} (1984Si16).
160DY L 1535.151 23 4- D
160DY B 0.235 6 9.412 13
160DYS B EAV=85.16 35
160DY G 176.49 3 0.0205 11(E2) 0.360
160DYS G KC=0.230 4$LC=0.1005 14$MC=0.0237 4
160DYS G NC=0.00534 8$OC=0.000667 10$PC=1.065E-5 15
160DY cG RI 1983Ji01 do not report an I|g value for this |g
160DY G 246.489 16 0.069 3(E1) 0.0283 C
160DYS G KC=0.0239 4$LC=0.00342 5$MC=0.000747 11
160DYS G NC=0.0001711 24$OC=2.43E-5 4$PC=1.237E-6 18
160DY G 379.41 8 0.047 2
160DY G 486.06 5 0.281 5E1+M2 +0.04 3 0.0056 4
160DYS G KC=0.0048 3$LC=0.00066 5$MC=0.000144 10
160DYS G NC=3.32E-5 24$OC=4.8E-6 4$PC=2.63E-7 19
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39.
160DY G 1251.27 5 0.352 3E1(+M2) -0.01 3 8.78E-416 C
160DYS G KC=0.000712 13$LC=9.36E-5 18$MC=2.03E-5 4
160DYS G NC=4.68E-6 9$OC=6.86E-7 14$PC=3.99E-8 8$IPC=4.61E-5 7
160DY cG RI I|g=0.300 {I8} (1992Si23) excluded from the average
160DY cG MR from 1989Ma39. Others: -0.118 {I85} (1982Kr04), +0.02
160DY2cG {I+19-12} (1979Gr22).
160DY L 1555.83 24 1+,2+
160DY B 0.00105 17 11.66 7
160DYS B EAV=78.72 35
160DY G 1468.6 3 0.0019 5(E2) 1.48E-3
160DYS G KC=0.001204 17$LC=0.0001680 24$MC=3.67E-5 6
160DYS G NC=8.47E-6 12$OC=1.234E-6 18$PC=6.96E-8 10$IPC=6.29E-5 9
160DY cG E,RI from 1986AdZX
160DY cG M from adopted gammas
160DY G 1556.6 4 0.0016 2
160DY cG E,RI from 1986AdZX