159DY 159HO EC DECAY 1982VY02,1971BO18 12NDS 201201
159DY H TYP=FUL$AUT=C. W. Reich$CIT=NDS 113, 157 (2012)$CUT=31-Dec-2010$
159DY D DATA SET UPDATED (NOVEMBER, 2010) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE NEW QP
159DY2D VALUE, NEW CC VALUES, AND REVISED CONF NOTATION AND COMMENTS.
159DY c {+159}Ho produced by 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta
159DY2c (1966Gr25,1968Ab15,1975GaYZ,1982Vy02), by Dy(p,xn) (1971Bo18,1972Ki21),
159DY3c and by Tb(|a,4n) (1958To32). Measured |g singles, ce, |b{++}, and |g|g
159DY4c coincidence spectra.
159DY c The decay scheme and all |g and ce data are from 1982Vy02, unless
159DY2c otherwise noted. Others, with many fewer |g's and without
159DY3c uncertainties: 1966Gr25, 1968Ab15, and 1971Bo18.
159DY d Experimental methods:
159DY d 1958To32: From Tb(|a,4n). Measured G and T1/2.
159DY d 1961Ab02: From 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta. Measured ce spectra.
159DY2d Report 6 G's.
159DY d 1964Ma19: From natural Dy(p,xn) and 160DY(p,2n). Measured {+159}Ho
159DY2d T1/2 from decay of 128 G.
159DY d 1965St08: From {+165}Ho(p,7n)|){+159}Er(|e), with chemical separation.
159DY2d Measured G's [NaI(Tl) detector] and ce's. Report 3 G's.
159DY d 1966La11: From {+165}Ho(p,7n)|){+159}Er(|e). Measured G's and ce's.
159DY2d Report T1/2 and approximately 10 G's.
159DY d 1966Gr25: From 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta. Measured G's and
159DY2d ce's spectra. Report 25 G's and 16 multipolarities; 21 G's in a
159DY3d levelscheme with 7 excited levels.
159DY d 1968Ab15: From 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta. Measured G's
159DY2d and ce's. Report 32 G's and 23 multipolarities and 10
159DY3d excited levels.
159DY d 1971Bo18: From natural Dy(p,xn) at 65 MeV. Measured G, ce, and
159DY2d GG coincidence spectra. Report 67 G's and 37
159DY3d multipolarities and 13 excited levels.
159DY d 1972Ki21: From natural Dy(p,xn) with mass separation. Report T1/2
159DY2d of a level with an energy GE 177 and < 309.
159DY d 1975GaYZ: From 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta. Measured B+
159DY2d spectrum and decomposed it into 3 components.
159DY d 1975Gr44: Summarizes data from the Dubna laboratory, especially,
159DY2d Q(B+), three T1/2 and a LOGFT value.
159DY d 1975VaYX: Report 3 level half-lives.
159DY d 1976Kr21: Summarized |d(E2/M1) values.
159DY d 1976KrZG: Reports methology of B+ spectral analysis and gives three
159DY2d components of the B+ spectrum.
159DY d 1982Vy02: From 660-MeV proton spallation of Ta with chemical and mass
159DY2d separation. Measured B+, G, and ce spectra. Report 108 G's and
159DY3d 64 multipolarities and 16 excited levels.
159DY cE E$The measured values are given in comments.
159DY cE IB,IE$The I(|b{++})+I(|e) are from |g-intensity balances at the various
159DY2cE levels, and the I(|b{++}) and I(|e) are then computed from the
159DY3cE theoretical capture to positron ratios. The uncertainties do not
159DY4cE include any contribution from the incompleteness of the decay scheme as
159DY5cE indicated by the many unplaced |g rays. The measured I(|b{++}) values
159DY6cE are given in comments for comparison, and are in good agreement.
159DY cG E$Several uncertainties were increased due to inconsistencies among the
159DY2cG energies.
159DY cG RI$The measured K x-ray intensities (energies) are 110 {I4} (K|a{-2}| x
159DY2cG ray 45.207~keV), 197 {I5} (K|a{-1}| x ray 45.998), 66 {I3} (K|b{-1} x
159DY3cG ray 52.1), and 17.2 {I8} (K|b{-2} x ray 53.5).
159DY cG RI$The measured annihilation radiation intensity is 0.053 {I5}. This
159DY2cG value is unreasonably low if the |b{++} were stopped at the source,
159DY3cG since it implies a total I(|b{++})|?0.11% compared with the measured
159DY4cG total of 0.251% {I7} (1982Vy02) and > 0.20% (1975GaYZ). So, it is
159DY5cG reasonable to conclude that |b{++} were not stopped in the source.
159DY cG M,MR$From {+159}Dy Adopted |g radiations, but based on measured data
159DY2cG from this decay (1982Vy02). Others: 1966Gr25, 1968Ab15, and 1971Bo18.
159DY cL E$From least-squares fit to |g energies.
159DY cL J$From {+159}Dy Adopted Levels.
159DY cL T$From 1978AlZC by e|g(t) and |g|g(t); others: 1975VaYX, by the same
159DY2cL authors as 1978AlZC, 1972Ki21 and 1975Gr44, the latter two without
159DY3cL uncertainties. Values are from {+159}Ho |e decay only; see the {+159}Dy
159DY4cL Adopted Levels for additional data for the 177 level.
159DY cL BAND(A)$K{+|p}=3/2-, |n3/2[521] band.
159DY cL BAND(B)$K{+|p}=5/2+, |n5/2[642] band.
159DY cL BAND(C)$K{+|p}=5/2-, |n5/2[523] band.
159DY cL BAND(D)$K{+|p}=5/2-, |n5/2[512] band.
159HO P 0 7/2- 33.05 M 11 1837.6 27
159DY N 0.362 9 0.362 9 1.00 1.0
159DY cN NR$calculated to give 100% |g+ce feeding of the ground state. The
159DY2cN |b{++} and |e transition to the ground state is 2nd forbidden, hence
159DY3cN negligible.
159DY PN 3
159DY G 68.79 3 0.115 25
159DY G 326.30 4 0.046 4
159DY G 353.68 18 0.067 10
159DY G 372.00 13 0.033 8
159DY G 385.38 15 0.037 6
159DY G 412.3 9 0.026 5
159DY G 417.45 16 0.032 6 E1,E2
159DY G 453.21 9 0.043 8E2 0.0197
159DYS G KC=0.01567 22$LC=0.00311 5$MC=0.000702 10$NC+=0.000183 3
159DYS G NC=0.0001604 23$OC=2.19E-5 3$PC=8.68E-7 13
159DY G 472.53 15 0.108 5
159DY G 543.51 9 0.056 13
159DY G 546.25 17 0.93 7
159DY G 565.85 10 0.094 5E2 0.01106
159DYS G KC=0.00900 13$LC=0.001603 23$MC=0.000359 5$NC+=9.42E-5 14
159DYS G NC=8.23E-5 12$OC=1.146E-5 16$PC=5.09E-7 8
159DY G 580.75 20 0.097 9
159DY G 603.08 12 0.074 5
159DY G 608.69 17 0.046 5
159DY G 618.0 5 0.062 10
159DY G 658.11 12 0.068 5(M1) 0.01483
159DYS G KC=0.01258 18$LC=0.001765 25$MC=0.000386 6$NC+=0.0001031 15
159DYS G NC=8.92E-5 13$OC=1.312E-5 19$PC=7.65E-7 11
159DY G 862.94 6 0.060 5
159DY G 874.67 6 0.063 9(M1) 0.00735
159DYS G KC=0.00624 9$LC=0.000867 13$MC=0.000189 3$NC+=5.06E-5 7
159DYS G NC=4.38E-5 7$OC=6.44E-6 9$PC=3.77E-7 6
159DY G 951.37 10 0.040 3
159DY G 981.80 5 0.059 4
159DY G 1002.23 22 0.024 2
159DY G 1038.33 10 0.0197 14
159DY G 1188.6 3 0.015 5
159DY G 1199.31 11 0.028 5
159DY G 1218.50 13 0.0156 22
159DY G 1399.98 25 0.0094 22
159DY G 1437.4 3 0.0058 14
159DY G 1466.21 23 0.0102 15
159DY G 1555.6 3 0.007 4
159DY L 0 3/2- A
159DY E 0.0001 LE
159DY cE IE$Calculated from expected (1973Ra10) log| {Ift}|>11.0 for 2nd
159DY2cE forbidden |e+|b{++} decay.
159DY L 56.625 6 5/2- 0.21 NS 4 A
159DY E 0.013 40 1.1 30 6.2 GE 1.1 30
159DYS E EAV= 353.3 14 $ CK= 0.8238 $ CL= 0.1268 $ CM+= 0.03738
159DY cE E$E|b{++}=805 {I25} (1975GaYZ), 790 {I40} (1982Vy02), and 773 {I10}
159DY2cE (1976KrZG), which would include the branches to the 56 and 136 levels.
159DY3cE From Q(|e), E|b{++}=757 and 678 to these two levels.
159DY cE IB$For the 56 and 136 levels, the measured I(|b{++})=0.0218% {I23}
159DY2cE (1982Vy02) and 0.019% {I8} (1975GaYZ).
159DY G 56.626 8 14.3 3M1+E2 0.19 2 12.76 21
159DYS G KC=10.04 16$LC=2.12 13$MC=0.48 3$NC+=0.125 8
159DYS G NC=0.110 7$OC=0.0151 8$PC=0.000637 10
159DY L 136.435 6 7/2- A
159DY E 0.017 2.1 5 6.43 8 2.1 5
159DYS E EAV= 318.3 14 $ CK= 0.8269 $ CL= 0.1275 $ CM+= 0.03763
159DY cE E$See comment for 56 level.
159DY cE IB$See comment for 56 level.
159DY G 79.807 3 5.10 16M1+E2 0.18 2 4.64
159DYS G KC=3.79 6$LC=0.661 23$MC=0.148 6$NC+=0.0390 14
159DYS G NC=0.0339 13$OC=0.00480 15$PC=0.000236 4
159DY G 136.438 20 1.15 4E2 0.879
159DYS G KC=0.486 7$LC=0.303 5$MC=0.0720 10$NC+=0.0182 3
159DYS G NC=0.01618 23$OC=0.00198 3$PC=2.12E-5 3
159DY L 177.616 6 5/2+ 9.2 NS 10 B
159DY cL T$other: 10.4~ns {I10} (1975VaYX by same authors as 1978AlZC).
159DY2cL 1972Ki21 report a half-life of 9~ns for a level at or above 177~keV and
159DY3cL below 309~keV.
159DY E 0.012 20 1.6 23 6.1 GE 1.6 23
159DYS E EAV= 300.2 14 $ CK= 0.8281 $ CL= 0.1279 $ CM+= 0.03774
159DY G 41.182 4 3.17 19E1 0.612
159DYS G LC=0.480 7$MC=0.1059 15$NC+=0.0267 4
159DYS G NC=0.0236 4$OC=0.00299 5$PC=0.0001021 15
159DY G 121.012 14 100.0 18E1 0.185
159DYS G KC=0.1553 22$LC=0.0235 4$MC=0.00515 8$NC+=0.001341 19
159DYS G NC=0.001172 17$OC=0.0001615 23$PC=7.36E-6 11
159DY G 177.608 10 14.8 6E1 0.0665
159DYS G KC=0.0560 8$LC=0.00820 12$MC=0.00179 3$NC+=0.000470 7
159DYS G NC=0.000410 6$OC=5.74E-5 8$PC=2.80E-6 4
159DY L 208.987 6 7/2+ 1.35 NS 7 B
159DY E 0.001 10 0.2 22 6.4 GE 0.2 22
159DYS E EAV= 286.4 14 $CK= 0.8288$CL= 0.1282$CM+= 0.03782
159DY G 31.378 8 1.38 3M1+E2 0.19 2 26 3
159DYS G LC=19.9 24$MC=4.6 6$NC+=1.17 14
159DYS G NC=1.04 13$OC=0.134 15$PC=0.00361 6
159DY G 72.546 4 1.10 4E1 0.723
159DYS G KC=0.597 9$LC=0.0982 14$MC=0.0216 3$NC+=0.00555 8
159DYS G NC=0.00487 7$OC=0.000650 9$PC=2.64E-5 4
159DY G 152.375 13 2.94 16E1 0.1000
159DYS G KC=0.0841 12$LC=0.01245 18$MC=0.00272 4$NC+=0.000712 10
159DYS G NC=0.000622 9$OC=8.66E-5 13$PC=4.11E-6 6
159DY L 235.853 10 9/2- A
159DY E 0.0016 3 0.37 6 7.13 7 0.37 6
159DYS E EAV= 274.6 14 $CK= 0.8294$CL= 0.1284$CM+= 0.03789
159DY G 99.419 10 0.65 3E2 2.77
159DYS G KC=1.139 16$LC=1.255 18$MC=0.301 5$NC+=0.0756 11
159DYS G NC=0.0674 10$OC=0.00810 12$PC=4.72E-5 7
159DY G 179.250 22 0.35 4E2 0.342
159DYS G KC=0.220 3$LC=0.0942 14$MC=0.0222 4$NC+=0.00564 8
159DYS G NC=0.00500 7$OC=0.000626 9$PC=1.021E-5 15
159DY L 239.415 10 9/2+ B
159DY E 0.003 2 0.6 5 6.9 3 0.6 5
159DYS E EAV= 273.0 14$CK= 0.8294$CL= 0.1284$CM+= 0.03790
159DY G 30.427 13 0.367 14M1+E2 0.13 2 20 3
159DYS G LC=15.8 20$MC=3.6 5$NC+=0.93 12
159DYS G NC=0.82 11$OC=0.110 13$PC=0.00402 6
159DY G 61.77 11 E2 17.9 0.34 4 ?
159DYS G K/T=0.135 3$L/T=0.624 8$M/T=0.150 3$N+/T=0.0375 9
159DYS G N/T=0.0336 8$O/T=0.00396 9$P/T=7.07E-6 15
159DY cG TI$Value listed by author (1982Vy02), but no supporting I|g or ce data
159DY2cG given. Placement shown in table of |g data, but not in decay-scheme
159DY3cG table.
159DY G 102.985 22 0.52 6[E1] 0.285
159DYS G KC=0.238 4$LC=0.0368 6$MC=0.00807 12$NC+=0.00210 3
159DYS G NC=0.00183 3$OC=0.000250 4$PC=1.104E-5 16
159DY L 309.590 7 5/2- 0.2 NS LT C
159DY cL T$1975VaYX report 1.3~ns {I2} for level at 309~keV. Since the same
159DY2cL authors report this value for the 209-keV level in 1978AlZC, either the
159DY3cL level energy is a typographical error or there was an error in the
159DY4cL earlier measurement.
159DY E 0.180 7 70 2 4.81 1 70 2
159DYS E EAV= 242.2 14$CK= 0.8305$CL= 0.1289$CM+= 0.03806
159DY cE E$E{-|b{++}}=516 {I9} (1975GaYZ), 506 {I3} (1982Vy02), and 508 {I2}
159DY2cE (1976KrZG). From Q(|e), E|b{++}=504.
159DY cE IB$The measured I(|b{++})=0.209% {I16} (1982Vy02) and 0.189% {I40}
159DY2cE (1975GaYZ).
159DY G 100.599 8 13.3 5E1 0.304
159DYS G KC=0.254 4$LC=0.0393 6$MC=0.00862 12$NC+=0.00224 4
159DYS G NC=0.00196 3$OC=0.000267 4$PC=1.170E-5 17
159DY G 131.973 10 65.2 12E1 0.1470
159DYS G KC=0.1234 18$LC=0.0185 3$MC=0.00405 6$NC+=0.001056 15
159DYS G NC=0.000922 13$OC=0.0001276 18$PC=5.91E-6 9
159DY G 173.155 17 5.92 14M1 0.506
159DYS G KC=0.426 6$LC=0.0623 9$MC=0.01367 20$NC+=0.00365 6
159DYS G NC=0.00316 5$OC=0.000463 7$PC=2.65E-5 4
159DY G 252.963 8 37.8 11M1 0.179
159DYS G KC=0.1507 22$LC=0.0218 3$MC=0.00478 7$NC+=0.001278 18
159DYS G NC=0.001106 16$OC=0.0001622 23$PC=9.32E-6 13
159DY G 309.594 18 47.6 16M1 0.1038
159DYS G KC=0.0877 13$LC=0.01261 18$MC=0.00276 4$NC+=0.000739 11
159DYS G NC=0.000640 9$OC=9.38E-5 14$PC=5.41E-6 8
159DY L 395.264 7 7/2- C
159DY E 0.017 1 13.8 5 5.47 2 13.8 5
159DYS E EAV= 204.0 14$CK= 0.8311$CL= 0.1295$CM+= 0.03825
159DY cE E$E{-|b{++}}=460 {I32} (1975GaYZ), 421 {I+22-17} (1982Vy02), and 425
159DY2cE {I6} (1976KrZG). From Q(|e), E|b{++}=419.
159DY cE IB$The measured I(|b{++})=0.020% {I4} (1982Vy02) and < 0.068%
159DY2cE (1975GaYZ).
159DY G 85.669 9 0.413 23M1+E2 0.65 10 4.07 10
159DYS G KC=2.69 11$LC=1.07 14$MC=0.25 4$NC+=0.064 8
159DYS G NC=0.057 8$OC=0.0072 9$PC=0.000158 9
159DY G 155.851 13 5.36 18E1 0.0941
159DYS G KC=0.0792 11$LC=0.01170 17$MC=0.00256 4$NC+=0.000670 10
159DYS G NC=0.000584 9$OC=8.15E-5 12$PC=3.89E-6 6
159DY G 159.426 16 1.00 5M1 0.637
159DYS G KC=0.537 8$LC=0.0785 11$MC=0.01724 25$NC+=0.00461 7
159DYS G NC=0.00399 6$OC=0.000584 9$PC=3.34E-5 5
159DY G 186.274 9 9.3 4E1 0.0586
159DYS G KC=0.0494 7$LC=0.00720 10$MC=0.001575 22$NC+=0.000413 6
159DYS G NC=0.000360 5$OC=5.06E-5 7$PC=2.48E-6 4
159DY G 217.647 8 10.1 3E1 0.0390
159DYS G KC=0.0329 5$LC=0.00475 7$MC=0.001037 15$NC+=0.000273 4
159DYS G NC=0.000238 4$OC=3.35E-5 5$PC=1.682E-6 24
159DY G 258.822 11 5.08 17M1 0.1679
159DYS G KC=0.1417 20$LC=0.0205 3$MC=0.00449 7$NC+=0.001200 17
159DYS G NC=0.001039 15$OC=0.0001524 22$PC=8.76E-6 13
159DY G 338.63 3 2.22 19M1+E2 0.65 20 0.071 5
159DYS G KC=0.059 5$LC=0.0094 3$MC=0.00208 5$NC+=0.000552 15
159DYS G NC=0.000480 13$OC=6.86E-5 25$PC=3.5E-6 4
159DY G 395.258 14 0.97 3E2 0.0287
159DYS G KC=0.0225 4$LC=0.00482 7$MC=0.001096 16$NC+=0.000285 4
159DYS G NC=0.000250 4$OC=3.38E-5 5$PC=1.224E-6 18
159DY L 504.972 17 9/2- C
159DY E 0.87 4 6.60 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8310$CL= 0.1301$CM+= 0.03848
159DY G 195.40 5 0.122 17E2 0.255
159DYS G KC=0.1701 24$LC=0.0659 10$MC=0.01548 22$NC+=0.00394 6
159DYS G NC=0.00349 5$OC=0.000441 7$PC=8.07E-6 12
159DY G 265.56 6 0.56 3E1 0.0234
159DYS G KC=0.0198 3$LC=0.00282 4$MC=0.000615 9$NC+=0.0001621 23
159DYS G NC=0.0001410 20$OC=2.00E-5 3$PC=1.031E-6 15
159DY G 269.11 5 0.229 24M1 0.1511
159DYS G KC=0.1276 18$LC=0.0184 3$MC=0.00404 6$NC+=0.001080 16
159DYS G NC=0.000935 13$OC=0.0001371 20$PC=7.88E-6 11
159DY G 295.939 23 1.49 6 [E1] 0.01779
159DYS G KC=0.01507 22$LC=0.00213 3$MC=0.000465 7$NC+=0.0001228 18
159DYS G NC=0.0001068 15$OC=1.523E-5 22$PC=7.94E-7 12
159DY cG E$Reported as 295.393 {I23} in one table, but the listed value is given
159DY2cG in another table.
159DY G 448.46 4 0.031 4E2 0.0202
159DYS G KC=0.01610 23$LC=0.00321 5$MC=0.000726 11$NC+=0.000189 3
159DYS G NC=0.0001659 24$OC=2.27E-5 4$PC=8.91E-7 13
159DY L 1016.236 11 5/2- D
159DY E 7.2 2 5.24 1
159DYS E CK= 0.8248$CL= 0.1350$CM+= 0.04020
159DY G 620.95 4 0.76 4M1+E2 0.59 16 0.0150 9
159DYS G KC=0.0127 8$LC=0.00184 9$MC=0.000403 19$NC+=0.000107 5
159DYS G NC=9.3E-5 5$OC=1.36E-5 7$PC=7.6E-7 5
159DY G 706.648 15 3.26 7M1 0.01242
159DYS G KC=0.01054 15$LC=0.001475 21$MC=0.000322 5$NC+=8.62E-5 12
159DYS G NC=7.46E-5 11$OC=1.096E-5 16$PC=6.40E-7 9
159DY G 807.236 16 3.54 7E1 0.00188
159DYS G KC=0.001606 23$LC=0.000215 3$MC=4.67E-5 7$NC+=1.243E-5 18
159DYS G NC=1.078E-5 15$OC=1.570E-6 22$PC=8.92E-8 13
159DY G 838.625 18 10.61 25E1 1.75E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001491 21$LC=0.000199 3$MC=4.33E-5 6$NC+=1.152E-5 17
159DYS G NC=9.98E-6 14$OC=1.455E-6 21$PC=8.29E-8 12
159DY cG E$From the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but given as
159DY2cG 838.635~{I18} in the table of |g radiation (table 2) of the same
159DY3cG reference.
159DY G 879.55 20 0.248 7E2 0.00399
159DYS G KC=0.00334 5$LC=0.000511 8$MC=0.0001129 16$NC+=2.99E-5 5
159DYS G NC=2.60E-5 4$OC=3.72E-6 6$PC=1.92E-7 3
159DY cG E$Uncertainty increased from 0.04~keV, due to inconsistency with energy
159DY2cG of 1016 |g from this level.
159DY G 959.66 5 0.089 4 E0+(M1,E2)
159DY cG M$%E0|?1.0, with deduced value depending on M1,E2 mixture.
159DY G 1016.356 1.32 3 M1 0.00510
159DYS G KC=0.00434 6$LC=0.000600 9$MC=0.0001309 19$NC+=3.50E-5 5
159DYS G NC=3.03E-5 5$OC=4.46E-6 7$PC=2.62E-7 4
159DY2 G FL=0
159DY cG E$Uncertainty reported as 0.021~keV, but energy differs by 0.10~keV
159DY2cG from level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be
159DY3cG misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given.
159DY L 1075.837 14 5/2-
159DY E 0.60 2 6.25 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8234$CL= 0.1361$CM+= 0.04056
159DY G 680.79 6 0.052 3 [M1,E2] 0.010 4
159DY2 G FL=395.264
159DY G 766.12 5 0.323 8M1+E2 0.59 13 0.0089 5
159DYS G KC=0.0076 4$LC=0.00108 5$MC=0.000236 10$NC+=6.3E-5 3
159DYS G NC=5.46E-5 22$OC=8.0E-6 4$PC=4.55E-7 23
159DY cG E$Uncertainty increased from 0.022~keV, due to inconsistency with other
159DY2cG |g's from this level.
159DY G 866.82 4 0.109 4[E1] 1.64E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001399 20$LC=0.000187 3$MC=4.05E-5 6$NC+=1.079E-5 16
159DYS G NC=9.35E-6 13$OC=1.363E-6 19$PC=7.78E-8 11
159DY G 898.167 25 0.135 3E1 1.53E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001306 19$LC=0.0001742 25$MC=3.78E-5 6$NC+=1.006E-5 14
159DYS G NC=8.72E-6 13$OC=1.272E-6 18$PC=7.27E-8 11
159DY G 939.45 3 0.137 4E2 0.00347
159DYS G KC=0.00291 4$LC=0.000439 7$MC=9.66E-5 14$NC+=2.56E-5 4
159DYS G NC=2.22E-5 4$OC=3.20E-6 5$PC=1.676E-7 24
159DY G 1019.20 3 0.543 13E0+(M1,E2)
159DY cG M$%E0|?0.9, with deduced value depending on M1,E2 mixture.
159DY G 1075.87 3 0.349 8E2 0.00262
159DYS G KC=0.00221 3$LC=0.000323 5$MC=7.10E-5 10$NC+=1.88E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.635E-5 23$OC=2.36E-6 4$PC=1.273E-7 18
159DY L 1090.560 13 7/2- D
159DY E 1.11 4 5.96 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8230$CL= 0.1363$CM+= 0.04065
159DY G 585.54 6 0.086 5M1 0.0199
159DYS G KC=0.01685 24$LC=0.00237 4$MC=0.000519 8$NC+=0.0001388 20
159DYS G NC=0.0001201 17$OC=1.765E-5 25$PC=1.027E-6 15
159DY G 695.25 3 0.189 27M1 0.01293
159DYS G KC=0.01097 16$LC=0.001536 22$MC=0.000336 5$NC+=8.98E-5 13
159DYS G NC=7.77E-5 11$OC=1.142E-5 16$PC=6.66E-7 10
159DY G 780.99 3 0.134 5M1+E2 0.77 20 0.0080 6
159DYS G KC=0.0068 5$LC=0.00097 6$MC=0.000214 13$NC+=5.7E-5 4
159DYS G NC=4.9E-5 3$OC=7.2E-6 5$PC=4.1E-7 4
159DY G 851.133 19 0.696 16E1 1.70E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001449 21$LC=0.000194 3$MC=4.20E-5 6$NC+=1.119E-5 16
159DYS G NC=9.69E-6 14$OC=1.413E-6 20$PC=8.06E-8 12
159DY G 881.55 3 1.034 22E1 1.58E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001354 19$LC=0.000181 3$MC=3.92E-5 6$NC+=1.044E-5 15
159DYS G NC=9.04E-6 13$OC=1.319E-6 19$PC=7.53E-8 11
159DY G 913.119 0.741 15E1 1.48E-3
159DY2 G FL=177.616
159DYS G KC=0.001266 18$LC=0.0001687 24$MC=3.66E-5 6$NC+=9.75E-6 14
159DYS G NC=8.44E-6 12$OC=1.232E-6 18$PC=7.05E-8 10
159DY cG E$Uncertainty reported as 0.020~keV, but energy differs by 0.12~keV
159DY2cG from level-energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be
159DY3cG misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given.
159DY G 954.19 9 0.034 3 E0+(M1,E2)
159DY cG M$%E0|?1.0, with deduced value depending on M1,E2 mixture.
159DY G 1034.00 3 0.146 3E2 0.00284
159DYS G KC=0.00239 4$LC=0.000353 5$MC=7.76E-5 11$NC+=2.06E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.79E-5 3$OC=2.58E-6 4$PC=1.379E-7 20
159DY L 1153.674 16 5/2-,7/2-
159DY E 0.27 1 6.50 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8212$CL= 0.1377 $CM+= 0.04113
159DY G 649.42 0.039 8[M1,E2] 0.012 4
159DY2 G FL=504.972
159DY cG E$Uncertainty reported as 0.06~keV, but energy differs by 0.68~keV from
159DY2cG level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be
159DY3cG misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given.
159DY G 758.330 24 0.165 6M1+E2 0.87 5 0.0083219
159DYS G KC=0.00702 16$LC=0.001019 21$MC=0.000224 5$NC+=5.96E-5 12
159DYS G NC=5.17E-5 11$OC=7.52E-6 16$PC=4.19E-7 10
159DY G 843.78 7 0.073 11[M1,E2] 0.0062 19
159DY2 G FL=309.590
159DY cG E$Uncertainty reported as 0.07~keV, but energy differs by 0.32~keV from
159DY2cG level energy difference. The large difference suggests |g might be
159DY3cG misplaced or E|g value incorrectly given.
159DY G 944.85 4 0.118 5E1 1.39E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001187 17$LC=0.0001579 23$MC=3.43E-5 5$NC+=9.12E-6 13
159DYS G NC=7.90E-6 11$OC=1.154E-6 17$PC=6.61E-8 10
159DY2 G FL=208.987
159DY G 976.09 4 0.127 6(E1) 1.31E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001116 16$LC=0.0001483 21$MC=3.22E-5 5$NC+=8.57E-6 12
159DYS G NC=7.42E-6 11$OC=1.084E-6 16$PC=6.23E-8 9
159DY G 1097.03 6 0.051 2 [M1,E2] 0.0034 9
159DY G 1153.68 3 0.176 4E2 0.00228
159DYS G KC=0.00192 3$LC=0.000278 4$MC=6.09E-5 9$NC+=1.79E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.403E-5 20$OC=2.03E-6 3$PC=1.108E-7 16$IPC=1.752E-6 25
159DY L 1201.921 13 5/2-,7/2-
159DY E 0.66 2 6.04 1
159DYS E CK= 0.8195$CL= 0.1389 $CM+= 0.04156
159DY G 892.288 23 0.252 8 M1 0.00700
159DYS G KC=0.00595 9$LC=0.000825 12$MC=0.000180 3$NC+=4.82E-5 7
159DYS G NC=4.17E-5 6$OC=6.13E-6 9$PC=3.59E-7 5
159DY G 992.940 25 0.213 5E1 1.26E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001081 16$LC=0.0001436 20$MC=3.11E-5 5$NC+=8.29E-6 12
159DYS G NC=7.18E-6 10$OC=1.049E-6 15$PC=6.03E-8 9
159DY G 1024.317 24 0.675 15E1 1.19E-3
159DYS G KC=0.001021 15$LC=0.0001353 19$MC=2.94E-5 5$NC+=7.82E-6 11
159DYS G NC=6.77E-6 10$OC=9.90E-7 14$PC=5.70E-8 8
159DY G 1065.43 6 0.044 3E2 0.00267
159DYS G KC=0.00225 4$LC=0.000330 5$MC=7.25E-5 11$NC+=1.92E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.671E-5 24$OC=2.41E-6 4$PC=1.298E-7 19
159DY cG M$Given as E2 in the table of |g radiation (table 2), but not listed in
159DY2cG the decay-scheme table (table 5).
159DY G 1145.32 3 0.160 4E2 0.00231
159DYS G KC=0.00195 3$LC=0.000282 4$MC=6.18E-5 9$NC+=1.779E-5 25
159DYS G NC=1.425E-5 20$OC=2.06E-6 3$PC=1.124E-7 16$IPC=1.368E-6 20
159DY G 1201.93 3 0.488 10E2 0.00210
159DYS G KC=0.001771 25$LC=0.000254 4$MC=5.57E-5 8$NC+=2.03E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.284E-5 18$OC=1.86E-6 3$PC=1.023E-7 15$IPC=5.52E-6 8
159DY L 1286.92 4
159DY E 0.056 3 6.98 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8158$CL= 0.1417 $CM+= 0.04254
159DY G 1047.62 10 0.0196 20
159DY G 1078.0 5 0.020 4
159DY G 1109.48 9 0.029 2
159DY G 1150.50 8 0.028 2
159DY G 1230.19 5 0.059 2
159DY L 1370.684 22 5/2+
159DY E 0.136 4 6.43 2
159DYS E CK= 0.8106$CL= 0.1455 2$CM+= 0.04389 6
159DY G 1061.11 4 0.065 2
159DY G 1161.68 5 0.061 2
159DY G 1193.07 3 0.178 4E2 0.00213
159DYS G KC=0.00180 3$LC=0.000258 4$MC=5.66E-5 8$NC+=1.97E-5 3
159DYS G NC=1.305E-5 19$OC=1.89E-6 3$PC=1.038E-7 15$IPC=4.63E-6 7
159DY cG E$From the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but given as
159DY2cG 1193.06 {I3} in the table of |g radiations (table 2) in this reference.
159DY cG M$Given as E2 in the decay-scheme table (table 5) of 1982Vy02, but no
159DY2cG mult entry given in the table of |g radiations (table 2) of this
159DY3cG reference.
159DY G 1234.26 13 0.0158 24
159DY G 1313.88 23 0.0146 13
159DY G 1370.53 11 0.0398 16