158HO 158ER EC DECAY 1977ANYX,1982VY06,1996GO0617NDS 201704
158HO H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 141, 1 (2017)$CUT=1-Feb-2017$
158HO c The decay scheme is that of 1982Vy06 with changes from 1996Go06 to
158HO2c incorporate the 7.7-keV |g; the coincidence data of 1982Vy06
158HO3c indicate that several levels proposed by 1972Ha41, and repeated
158HO4c by 1977AnYX, do not exist.
158HO c This decay scheme is not well established. The decay energy, now
158HO4c established to 880 keV {I40} by the mass evaluators (2012Wa38) and
158HO4c sustained by the more recent figure of 890 keV {I30} (V.G. Kalinnikov,
158HO4c priv. comm., 2010), was previously in dispute with the mass evaluation,
158HO4c when some of the important references reported of |b+ decay to excited
158HO4c levels giving the decay energy of |? 1700 keV (1961Bo24, 1977KaYG,
158HO4c 1982Vy06). Also, 1977AnYX assigned several |g's with energies above
158HO4c 1000 keV to this decay. While the lower decay energy has been adopted
158HO4c here, some questions can be raised whether the present data are still
158HO4c subject of some inconsistencies.
158HO c Primary references are 1977AnYX, 1982Vy06 (which is a summary
158HO2c of previous work at this laboratory), 1996Go06, and 1998KaZV;
158HO3c other measurements include 1981BuZJ, 1978Sc10, 1977KaYG,
158HO4c 1977AnZG, 1975Ru02 (1974RuZX, 1973RuZO), 1975Gr44, 1975BuZQ,
158HO5c 1975AlYQ, 1972Ha41 (1970HaZG, 1970HaZG), 1971TrZQ, 1968Ab04,
158HO6c 1968Ab18, 1965St08, 1961Gr25, 1961Bo24, and 1960Dn01.
158HO c After 1996, there is a series of experimental studies (very short
158HO2c conference papers) continuing 1982Vy06 and 1996Go06 done with YaSNAPP-2
158HO3c ISOL complex (consisting mostly of Ge detectors) by measuring |g and
158HO4c Kx-rays and |g|g and Kx-|g coin, and dealing with {+158}Er |e decay to
158HO5c {+158}Ho, and {+158}Ho |e decay to {+158}Dy: 2006VaZY, 2004KaZT
158HO6c ({+158}Ho levels, Q|e), 2005KaZY ({+158}Ho excited levels T{-1/2}'s),
158HO7c 2008VaZU ({+158}Dy 0+ state), 2011GoZY ({+158}Ho excited levels, E|g's
158HO8c and I|g's, but not placed to levels), 2011StZX (E|g's previously
158HO9c observed in {+158}Ho but not confirmed hereby). The evaluator received
158HOac the notes of the private communication of B. Singh with V.G.
158HObc Kalinnikov, co-author of most of these publications, who proposed some
158HOcc new details and corrections to the previously reported data. These are
158HOdc referenced in this evaluation as "V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010"
158HO c Sources produced by spallation of Ta with 660-MeV p, Ho(p,xn),
158HO2c {+160}Dy(|a,6n), {+150}Sm({+12}C,4n), and {+151}Eu({+11}B,4n)
158HO3c reactions often followed by chemical and/or mass separation.
158HO4c Measurements include E{-|g}, I{-|g}, I{-ce}, and |g-ce
158HO5c coincidences.
158HO cE The I{-|e} values have been computed from the
158HO2cE |g-intensity balances at each level assuming that there is
158HO3cE negligible |e decay to the levels at g.s. and 67 keV, as
158HO4cE expected from J|p considerations.
158HO cE $One of the questions one can raise here is how consistent are the
158HO4cE beta-decay intensities,
158HO4cE therefore the log {Ift} adopted values, because of the existence of
158HO4cE the very many unplaced |g transitions. However the total intensity of
158HO4cE the unplaced |g's is less than 2% of the total intensity of the placed
158HO4cE |g transitions. Also, although many the multipolarities of the
158HO4cE |g transitions are still unknown, for most of the strongest transitions
158HO4cE they are known. For these reasons the beta-decay intensities
158HO4cE and the log {Ift} values are included here; however prudence is
158HO4cE advised in their usage.
158HO dE TI Obsolete - no more TI!
158HO2dE From |g-intensity balances at each level and assuming zero
158HO2dE |e branching to the levels at 0, 67, and 74 keV. Of these
158HO3dE three, the fastest should the unique 1st forbidden transition
158HO4dE to the 67-keV level with a log {If{+1u}t} > 8.5 and a
158HO5dE corresponding |e intensity of < 0.06%.
158HO cG E From 1998KaZV, unless otherwise noted.
158HO cG E Some |g-ray energies are very inconsistent or their
158HO2cG uncertainties are grossly under estimated. Those that differ by
158HO2cG 4|s or more from calculated value are noted separately
158HO cG E For the decay energy of 900 keV adopted here, the following
158HO2cG |g's from 1977AnYX can not occur in this decay: 1025.2, 1071.4,
158HO3cG 1082.5, 1143.2, 1222.9, 1645.0, 1715.5, and 1720.0 keV.
158HO cG RI The values are determined from the consideration of the
158HO2cG values reported by 1977AnYX, 1982Vy06, and 1998KaZV; below 60
158HO3cG keV the values of 1977AnYX are considerably lower than those of
158HO4cG the other two papers and are not used. Other set of data are
158HO2cG given by 1965St08, 1968Ab14, 1971TrZQ, and 1972Ha41.
158HO cG M From I{-ce} and I{-|g} data of 1977AnYX and 1982Vy06 and
158HO2cG ce data of 1972Ha41, unless otherwise noted.
158HO cG MR From 1972Ha41 and 1982Vy06.
158HO cG E(R) From 1977AnYX and 1982Vy06.
158HO cG E(S),RI(S)$From 1977AnYX only.
158HO cG E(T),RI(T)$From 1982Vy06 only.
158HO cG E(U),RI(U)$From 1998KaZV only.
158HO cG E(V),RI(V)$From 2011GoZY
158HO2DG WITH IG'S RELATIVE TO ^I(218.2G)=8000 IN
158HO2DG 158HO EC DECAY IN EQUILIBRIUM WITH 158ER EC DECAY (FOR 43.44G,
158HO2DG 45.4G, AND 62.2G INTENSITIES ARE MEASURED BY GG COIN).
158HO2DG ^B. Singh asked if the 8000 scale is the same as of the other
158HO2DG G's. I did not find a definite answer, but
158HO2DG V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010 place some of them in the level
158HO2DG scheme directly, meaning that the scale is the same
158HO2DG Also 1998KaZV uses the same norm of 8000, and their IG's
158HO2DG have the same values as those here
158HO cG E(v),RI(v)$From V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010 (that together with
158HO2cG new transitions restate some of the transitions given by 2011GoZY)
158HO cG E(f)$Differs by 4|s or more from calculated value
158HO cL See 1981BuZJ for ce-|g coincidence results.
158HO2cL Also some of the results of V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010
158HO2cL are based on coincidence results
158HO cL $2011GoZY give a list of levels (reproduced here exactly by translation
158HO2cL from Russian): "74.9 keV (2+) and its rotational state 125.6~keV, 3+;
158HO3cL 91.6~keV (1-) and its rotational state 137.1, 2-; 146.8~keV (1+) with
158HO4cL rotational states 190.2~keV, 2+ and 254.3~keV, 3+ (presumably).
158HO5cL Observed are also a few excitations with states J{+|p}=1+ for energies
158HO6cL 385.7; 433.2; 461.7 and 662.7~keV. Presumably characteristic J{+|p}=1+
158HO7cL have levels 810.8 and 857.7 keV". |g-ray energies and relative
158HO8cL intensities are also given in a table, (given as unplaced gammas in the
158HO9cL |g({+158}Ho). Table below) but there is no level scheme drawing or a
158HOacL specification of the placement of the |g transitions to levels.
158HObcL However V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010 place many of these |g's and
158HOccL levels in the levels scheme, that are considered in this evaluation as
158HOdcL well
158HO cL E$From least-squares fit to |g energies with normalized |h{+2} = 81.8
158HO2cL greater than critical |h{+2} = 1.8. The cause seems to be the very
158HO2cL precisely-reported measured |g-ray energies.
158HO cL J From {+158}Ho Adopted Levels where the configurations are
158HO2cL also discussed.
158HO cL J(J)$Postulated by V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010.
158HO2cL Specific arguments are given in the Adopted Levels table
158HO DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
158HO2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
158HO DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
158ER P 0.0 0+ 2.29 H 6 880 40
158ER cP QP$From 2012Wa38; 890~keV {I30} (V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010)
158HO N 0.0072 4 0.0072 4 1.00
158HO cN NR calculated to give 100% |e decay with zero |e branching
158HO2cN to the ground state and the 67-keV level.
158HO PN 3
158HO G 25.5 2 17 3 T
158HO cG $%I|g=0.123~{I23}
158HO G 28.66 6 1.4 4 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.010~{I3}
158HO G 30.6 1 0.5 AP V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.0036~{I19}
158HO G 30.8 2 3 LT T
158HO cG $%I|g=0.011~{I11}
158HO cG M,MR Assigned E1 (1972Ha41) and M1+E2 with |d |? 0.18 (1982Vy06).
158HO G 43.43 2 21 3 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.216~{I25}
158HO G 45.5 2
158HO cG E$from 1982Vy06
158HO G 62.2 2 2.5 AP V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.018~{I9}
158HO G 86.3 1 6.5 10 v
158HO cG $%I|g=0.048~{I7}
158HO G 101.34 4 28 5 S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.20~{I4}
158HO G 114.17 5 2.3 6 U
158HO cG $%I|g=0.017~{I5}
158HO G 118.63 6 18 2 R
158HO cG $%I|g=0.130~{I16}
158HO cG M Assigned E1 or E2 (1977AnYX).
158HO G 162.37 7 2.9 4 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.021~{I3}
158HO G 162.5 5 7 3 T
158HO cG $%I|g=0.050~{I22}
158HO G 166.89 5 3.8 12 U
158HO cG $%I|g=0.027~{I9}
158HO G 189.1 1 2.5 4 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.018~{I3}
158HO G 190.2 5 6 3 T
158HO cG $%I|g=0.043~{I22}
158HO G 201.5 1 1.6 5 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.012~{I4}
158HO G 212.52 7 5.9 6 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.043~{I5}
158HO G 233.50 6 6.3 16 U
158HO cG $%I|g=0.045~{I12}
158HO G 294.19 5 16 3
158HO cG $%I|g=0.115~{I23}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 294.1 {I1} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 326.0 1 12 3 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.087~{I23}
158HO G 326.7 3 37 6 (E1) 0.01448 T
158HOS G KC=0.01225 18$LC=0.001741 25$MC=0.000382 6
158HOS G NC=8.80E-5 13$OC=1.249E-5 18$PC=6.44E-7 10
158HO cG $%I|g=0.27~{I5}
158HO G 328.9 3 6 LT T
158HO cG $%I|g=0.022~{I22}
158HO G 394.5 1 25 LE U
158HO cG $%I|g=0.09~{I9}
158HO G 425.3 2 4 AP S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.029~{I15}
158HO G 536.8 2 19 52 S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.1~{I4}
158HO G 571.0 1 12.9 20 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.093~{I16}
158HO G 620.5 2 32 AP S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.23~{I12}
158HO G 629.2 2 43 5 S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.31~{I4}
158HO G 664.0 2 3.5 5 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.025~{I4}
158HO G 735.6 2 8.0 12 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.058~{I10}
158HO G 766.2 2 31 6 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.22~{I5}
158HO G 790.5 2 6.8 17 V
158HO cG $%I|g=0.049~{I13}
158HO G 826.7 1 43 5 S
158HO cG $%I|g=0.31~{I4}
158HO L 0.0 5+ 11.3 M 4
158HO cL T From {+158}Ho Adopted Levels.
158HO L 67.200 10 2- 28 M 2 M1
158HO2 L %EC+%B+ LT 19 $ %IT GT 81 $ MOMM1=+2.44 3 $ MOME2=+1.66 17
158HO cL %EC+%B+ From I{-|g+ce}(feeding 67 level)-I{-|g+ce}(67), assuming
158HO2cL I{-|g}(67) was measured at equilibrium in {+158}Er |e decay.
158HO cL T From {+158}Ho Adopted Levels.
158HO G 67.200 10 29.0 15E3 477
158HOS G KC=3.85 6$LC=356 5$MC=93.1 13
158HOS G NC=21.1 3$OC=2.41 4$PC=0.001608 23
158HO cG $%I|g=0.209~{I3}
158HO cG RI$Relative intensity at equilibrium: 36.4~{I19}
158HO cG E from 2000KoZT and 1998KaZV.
158HO L 74.897 11 2+ 60 NS 10
158HO cL E level proposed by 1996Go06.
158HO cL T$From 2005KaZY, with uncertainty adjusted by V.G. Kalinnikov, priv.
158HO2cL comm., 2010; same value as in {+158}Ho Adopted Levels
158HO G 7.697 4 E1 14.14 12891
158HO2 G FL=67.200
158HOS G M/T=0.763 7
158HOS G N/T=0.158 3$O/T=0.01278 25$P/T=0.000216 5
158HOS G MC=11.56 17
158HOS G NC=2.38 4$OC=0.193 3$PC=0.00327 5
158HO cG E from 1996Go06.
158HO cG M from M-shell and N-shell ce ratios (1996Go06).
158HO cG TI from intensity balance at the 74 level assuming the
158HO2cG 2nd forbidden |e transition to this level is negligible.
158HO L 91.595 12 1-,2-,3- 140 NS 25
158HO cL T$From 2005KaZY, same value as in {+158}Ho Adopted Levels
158HO G 24.395 6 27 3 M1+E2 0.071 10 34.2 25
158HO cG $%I|g=0.195~{I24}
158HO2 G FL=67.200
158HOS G LC=26.6 19$MC=6.0 5
158HOS G NC=1.38 10$OC=0.190 12$PC=0.00847 12
158HO cG E from 1996Go06.
158HO L 125.62 5 (2+)
158HOF L FLAG=J
158HO G 50.7 1 8 2[M1,E2] 23 21 v
158HOS G LC=18 16$MC=4.3 38
158HOS G NC=0.97 85$OC=0.114 97$PC=5.9E-4 40
158HO cG $%I|g=0.058~{I15}
158HO L 137.099 25 (2-)
158HOF L FLAG=J
158HO G 45.4 1 30 AP[M1,E2] 39 36 v
158HOS G LC=30 27$MC=7.3 66
158HOS G NC=1.6 15$OC=0.19 17$PC=8.0E-4 56
158HO cG $%I|g=0.22~{I11}
158HO G 69.91 3 7.3 15[M1,E2] 9.4 21
158HOS G KC=4.2 20$LC=4.0 31$MC=0.96 76
158HOS G NC=0.22 17$OC=0.026 20$PC=2.4E-4 15
158HO cG $%I|g=0.053~{I12}
158HO L 146.801 11 1+ 1.85 NS 10
158HO cL T$From X{-K}-ce delayed coincidence (1978Sc10, 1977AnZG), same value as
158HO2cL in {+158}Ho Adopted Levels; other: 1.7 {I2} (1973BuZT).
158HO E 76 11 4.76 9
158HOS E CK=0.8203 13$CL=0.1382 9$CM+=0.0415 4
158HO cE E$other: E{-|b+}=780 (1961Bo24)
158HO cE TI$Other, 77.5% (2006VaZY)
158HO G 71.903 2 15.0E+2 17M1+E2 0.068 15 6.77
158HOS G KC=5.65 8$LC=0.873 18$MC=0.193 4
158HOS G NC=0.0448 9$OC=0.00647 12$PC=0.000352 5
158HO cG $%I|g=10.8~{I14}
158HO cG E from 2000KoZT; others: 71.904 {I4} (1996Go06) and
158HO2cG 71.904 {I6} (1998KaZV).
158HO cG RI From 1230 {I16} (1977AnYX), 1600 {I100} (1982Vy06), and
158HO2cG 1658 {I33} (1998KaZV).
158HO G 79.603 10 13.4 15[E1] 0.580
158HO cG $%I|g=0.097~{I12}
158HO2 G FL=67.200
158HOS G KC=0.479 7$LC=0.0785 11$MC=0.01734 25
158HOS G NC=0.00394 6$OC=0.000523 8$PC=2.12E-5 3
158HO cG E from 1996Go06.
158HO L 190.243 15 0+,1+,2+
158HO G 43.43 2 59 6 M1+E2 0.050 23 5.0 3
158HO cG $%I|g=0.43~{I5}
158HO2 G FL=146.801
158HOS G LC=3.89 20$MC=0.86 5
158HOS G NC=0.200 11$OC=0.0287 13$PC=0.001542 22
158HO G 115.40 2 22.5 20(E2) 1.661
158HOS G KC=0.765 11$LC=0.688 10$MC=0.1656 24
158HOS G NC=0.0374 6$OC=0.00447 7$PC=3.21E-5 5
158HO cG $%I|g=0.162~{I17}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 115.33 {I2} (1977AnYX) 115.36 {I5}
158HO2cG (1982Vy06).
158HO cG RI From 20.9 {I19} (1977AnYX), 30 {I6} (1982Vy06), and
158HO2cG 24.2 {I13} (1998KaZV).
158HO L 240.75 4 0+,1+
158HO E 2.0 3 6.21 9
158HOS E CK=0.8172 17$CL=0.1405 13$CM+=0.0423 5
158HO G 50.68 4 30 4 M1+E2 0.21 +5-3 4.7 9
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HO cG $%I|g=0.22~{I4}
158HO2 G FL=190.243
158HOS G LC=3.7 7$MC=0.84 16
158HOS G NC=0.19 4$OC=0.026 4$PC=0.000948 22
158HO cG M,MR Assigned E1 by 1972Ha41 and 1977AnYX and M1+E2 by 1982Vy06
158HO2cG with |d |? 0.65, but all consistent with |d given here.
158HO G 93.68 5 23.5 20[M1,E2] 3.38 24
158HO cG $%I|g=0.170~{I17}
158HO2 G FL=146.801
158HOS G KC=1.96 69$LC=1.09 70$MC=0.26 18
158HOS G NC=0.059 39$OC=0.0072 43$PC=1.09E-4 56
158HO cG E From 1998KaZV; others: 93.05 (1968Ab14) and 93.1 (1972Ha41).
158HO L 255.034 18 (3+)
158HO cL E$postulated by V.G. Kalinnikov, priv. comm., 2010
158HO2cL based only on Ritz rules
158HOF L FLAG=J
158HO G 64.89 1 1.3 4[M1,E2] 12.3 32 v
158HO2 G FL=190.243
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HOS G KC=5.0 27$LC=5.6 45$MC=1.4 11
158HOS G NC=0.30 25$OC=0.036 28$PC=3.0E-4 18
158HO cG $%I|g=0.0094~{I28}
158HO G 107.48 3 5.1 8 [E2] 2.16 U
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HOS G KC=0.920 13$LC=0.950 14$MC=0.229 4
158HOS G NC=0.0516 8$OC=0.00616 9$PC=3.83E-5 6
158HO cG $%I|g=0.037~{I6}
158HO L 385.708 19 1+
158HO E 4.4 3 5.63 9
158HOS E CK=0.810 3$CL=0.1461 23$CM+=0.0442 8
158HO G 131.65 8 19.0 12[E2] 1.033 v
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HOS G KC=0.536 8$LC=0.382 6$MC=0.0916 13
158HOS G NC=0.0207 3$OC=0.00250 4$PC=2.30E-5 4
158HO cG $%I|g=0.141~{I15}
158HO G 195.42 2 200 10M1 0.394
158HOS G KC=0.332 5$LC=0.0487 7$MC=0.01076 15
158HOS G NC=0.00250 4$OC=0.000364 5$PC=2.05E-5 3
158HO cG $%I|g=1.44~{I11}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 195.43 {I1} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 238.86 3 34 3 M1 0.227
158HOS G KC=0.191 3$LC=0.0280 4$MC=0.00617 9
158HOS G NC=0.001434 20$OC=0.000209 3$PC=1.177E-5 17
158HO cG $%I|g=0.25~{I3}
158HO G 310.82 3 250 6 M1 0.1116
158HOS G KC=0.0941 14$LC=0.01368 20$MC=0.00301 5
158HOS G NC=0.000700 10$OC=0.0001020 15$PC=5.77E-6 8
158HO cG $%I|g=1.80~{I11}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 310.74 {I3} (1977AnYX).
158HO L 395.186 18 0,1
158HO E 3.24 22 5.74 9
158HOS E CK=0.809 4$CL=0.1466 24$CM+=0.0444 9
158HO G 204.16 3 24 2 M1,E2 0.29 6
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HO cG $%I|g=0.173~{I18}
158HO3 G FL=190.243
158HOS G KC=0.222 72$LC=0.051 8$MC=0.0117 23
158HOS G NC=0.0027 5$OC=0.00036 4$PC=1.27E-5 55
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 204.13 {I7} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 248.580 15 407 15E1 0.0287
158HOF G FLAG=f
158HO cG $%I|g=2.94~{I19}
158HO2 G FL=146.801
158HOS G KC=0.0242 4$LC=0.00350 5$MC=0.000768 11
158HOS G NC=0.0001766 25$OC=2.49E-5 4$PC=1.240E-6 18
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 248.58 {I1} (1977AnYX) and 248.58
158HO2cG {I5} (1982Vy06).
158HO L 398.13 5 0+,1+,2+ ?
158HO E 0.113 22 7.19 12
158HOS E CK=0.809 4$CL=0.1467 24$CM+=0.0445 9
158HO G 207.89 4 12.4 22M1,E2 0.27 6
158HOS G KC=0.211 69$LC=0.048 7$MC=0.0110 20
158HOS G NC=0.0025 5$OC=0.00034 4$PC=1.20E-5 52
158HO cG $%I|g=0.089~{I17}
158HO L 433.168 21 1+
158HO E 4.0 4 5.57 11
158HOS E CK=0.806 4$CL=0.149 3$CM+=0.0452 11
158HO G 286.40 5 22.7 12M1+(E2) 0.108 31
158HOS G KC=0.087 31$LC=0.0165 7$MC=0.00373 7
158HOS G NC=0.000857 20$OC=0.000118 10$PC=5.0E-6 22
158HO cG $%I|g=0.164~{I13}
158HO G 296.07 3 112 6 E1 0.0185
158HO cG $%I|g=0.81~{I7}
158HO2 G FL=137.099
158HOS G KC=0.01560 22$LC=0.00223 4$MC=0.000489 7
158HOS G NC=0.0001127 16$OC=1.595E-5 23$PC=8.13E-7 12
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 295.96 {I3} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 307.7 1 3.2 12 v
158HO cG $%I|g=0.024~{I9}
158HO G 341.58 3 145 20E1 0.01299
158HO cG $%I|g=1.05~{I16}
158HO2 G FL=91.595
158HOS G KC=0.01100 16$LC=0.001559 22$MC=0.000342 5
158HOS G NC=7.88E-5 11$OC=1.120E-5 16$PC=5.80E-7 9
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 341.58 {I6} (1977AnYX).
158HO cG M Assigned E1 by 1968Ab14 and 1971TrZQ and E2 by 1982Vy06.
158HO G 358.24 3 275 25M1 0.0766
158HOS G KC=0.0646 9$LC=0.00935 13$MC=0.00206 3
158HOS G NC=0.000478 7$OC=6.97E-5 10$PC=3.95E-6 6
158HO cG $%I|g=1.98~{I21}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 358.21 {I3} (1977AnYX).
158HO L 461.698 22 1+
158HO E 8.9 7 5.16 11
158HOS E CK=0.803 5$CL=0.151 4$CM+=0.0459 12
158HO G 28.7 2 2.0 6M1 16.2 4 35 11T
158HOS G L/T=0.736 12$M/T=0.163 6
158HOS G N/T=0.0377 13$O/T=0.00547 19$P/T=0.000305 11
158HOS G LC=12.7 4$MC=2.80 7
158HOS G NC=0.649 17$OC=0.0941 24$PC=0.00525 14
158HO cG $%I|g=0.014~{I5}
158HO cG TI From I{-ce}(L1) and |a(M1).
158HO cG RI From I{-|g+ce} and |a(M1); measured I{-|g} < 3.
158HO G 271.45 5 29 3 M1 0.1605
158HOS G KC=0.1353 19$LC=0.0197 3$MC=0.00435 6
158HOS G NC=0.001010 15$OC=0.0001472 21$PC=8.31E-6 12
158HO cG $%I|g=0.209~{I25}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 271.58 {I8} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 314.89 3 37 3 M1 0.1078
158HOS G KC=0.0909 13$LC=0.01321 19$MC=0.00291 4
158HOS G NC=0.000676 10$OC=9.85E-5 14$PC=5.57E-6 8
158HO cG $%I|g=0.27~{I3}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 314.95 {I7} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 336.02 6 16 2 (M1,E2) 0.069 22
158HOS G KC=0.056 21$LC=0.0100 11$MC=0.00225 20
158HOS G NC=0.00052 5$OC=7.2E-5 11$PC=3.3E-6 14
158HO cG $%I|g=0.115~{I16}
158HO cG $coin with 50.7|g
158HO G 386.82 3 1050 50M1 0.0626
158HOS G KC=0.0528 8$LC=0.00763 11$MC=0.001679 24
158HOS G NC=0.000390 6$OC=5.69E-5 8$PC=3.23E-6 5
158HO cG $%I|g=7.6~{I6}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 386.84 {I4} (1977AnYX).
158HO L 662.69 4 0+,1+
158HO E 1.84 14 5.17 24
158HOS E CK=0.76 3$CL=0.185 21$CM+=0.058 8
158HO G 200.2 3 6 LE T ?
158HO cG $%I|g=0.022~{I22}
158HO G 276.98 10 5.6 11(M1,E2) 0.119 34
158HOS G KC=0.095 33$LC=0.0183 5$MC=0.00415 7
158HOS G NC=0.000955 14$OC=0.000131 9$PC=5.5E-6 24
158HO cG $%I|g=0.040~{I9}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 276.9 {I1} (1977AnYX).
158HO cG RI From 5.9 {I15} (1977AnYX) and 5.3 {I17} (1998KaZV); other:
158HO2cG 12 {I4} (1982Vy06).
158HO G 472.42 6 111 5 M1 0.0372
158HOS G KC=0.0315 5$LC=0.00451 7$MC=0.000993 14
158HOS G NC=0.000231 4$OC=3.37E-5 5$PC=1.91E-6 3
158HO cG $%I|g=0.80~{I6}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 472.45 {I10} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 515.86 6 115 10M1 0.0297
158HOS G KC=0.0251 4$LC=0.00359 5$MC=0.000790 11
158HOS G NC=0.000183 3$OC=2.68E-5 4$PC=1.526E-6 22
158HO cG $%I|g=0.83~{I9}
158HO cG E from 1998KaZV; other: 515.9 {I1} (1977AnYX).
158HO G 587.90 8 16 3
158HO cG $%I|g=0.115~{I23}
158HO L 810.88 8 (1+)
158HOF L FLAG=J
158HO E 0.29 5 4.4 10
158HOS E CK=0.2 4$CL=0.6 3$CM+=0.22 14
158HO G 425.2 1 25 5 v
158HO cG $%I|g=0.19~{I4}
158HO G 620.6 1 15 3 v
158HO cG $%I|g=0.11~{I2}