157DY 157HO EC DECAY 1984AF01,1972TO05,1977ANYX16NDS 201602
157DY H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 132, 1 (2016)$CUT=4-Dec-2015$
157DY c The decay scheme is that of 1984Af01, which includes several levels
157DY2c not in the schemes of 1972To05, 1977AnYX, and 1972Vy02. The
157DY3c data are from these four references.
157DY c For these studies, {+157}Ho was produced by Dy(p,xn),
157DY2c {+149}Sm({+12}C,4n){+157}Er followed by |e decay, and p
157DY3c spallation of Ta with chemical or isotope separation. |g's
157DY4c measured with Ge detectors, ce measured with Si(Au) detectors
157DY5c and magnetic spectrometers, and |b+ with plastic scintillator.
157DY6c |g|g, |g|b+, and |gce coincidences and lifetimes measured.
157DY c Experimental methods:
157DY c 1965GrZZ: produced by p spallation of Ta. ce spectra measured
157DY2c in magnetic spectrograph.
157DY c 1972NeZI: abstract; no data.
157DY c 1972Ki21: produced by Dy(p,xn) with isotope separation. T{-1/2}(61)
157DY2c measured by counting ce in magnetic spectrometers.
157DY c 1972PaYV: progress report; no data; see 1972To05.
157DY c 1972To05: produced by Dy(p,xn) with isotope separation.
157DY2c |g singles and |g|g coincidences measured with Ge detectors,
157DY3c ce measured with Si(Au) detector, and |b+ with plastic
157DY4c scintillator. Reports E{-|g}, I{-|g}, I{-ce}, |a{-K}(exp),
157DY5c |g|g coincidences, |b+ endpoint from |g|b+ coincidences, and
157DY6c parent T{-1/2}.
157DY c 1972ToYX: thesis version of the material in 1972To05.
157DY c 1972Vy02: produced by {+149}Sm({+12}C,4n){+157}Er with E({+12}C) =
157DY2c 81 MeV followed by |e decay. For some samples the Ho was
157DY3c chemically separated from the Er. |g singles and |g|g
157DY4c coincidences measured with Ge detectors and ce with Si(Au)
157DY5c detector.
157DY c 1977AnYX: produced by {+149}Sm({+12}C,4n){+157}Er followed by |e
157DY2c decay. |g's measured with Ge detectors.
157DY c 1979AbZZ: abstract of lifetime measurements.
157DY c 1984Af01: produced by spallation of Ta target with 660 MeV p with
157DY2c isotope separation and some samples chemically separated.
157DY3c |g singles and |g|g coincidences were measured with Ge
157DY4c detectors and ce singles and |g-ce
157DY5c coincidences measured with magnetic spectrometer.
157DY c 1984GaZS: conference abstract with decay scheme drawing.
157DY2c Data not used.
157DY cE TI Deduced from |g intensity balances with the questionable
157DY2cE |g's omitted. Branch to ground state assumed to be 0% since
157DY3cE transition is 2nd forbidden with expected log {Ift} >11.0; and
157DY4cE therefore, expected I(|e+|b+) to ground state is < 0.0001%.
157DY cE TI There are many unplaced |g's and several have intensities
157DY2cE of over 0.2%. Therefore, I(|e+|b+) values of |< 1% are
157DY2cE considered unreliable and have not been included in the data
157DY2cE set. These values are 0.3% {I9} for 188 level, 0.7% {I12} for
157DY2cE 211, 0.23% {I19} for 234, 0.31% {I4} for 273, 0.17% {I4} for
157DY2cE 400.9, 0.16% {I13} for 401.1, 0.34% {I9} for 428, 0.40% {I18}
157DY2cE for 518, 0.81% {I14} for 527, 0.90% {I11} for 611, 0.33% {I6}
157DY2cE for 628, and 0.86% {I12} for 688.
157DY2cE For the same reason, the negative values have been omitted;
157DY2cE these are -2% {I4} for 147 level, -0.4% {I4} for
157DY2cE 257, and -0.27% {I12} for 455.
157DY cG E Average of values of 1984Af01, 1972To05, 1977AnYX, and
157DY2cG 1972Vy02; all |g's above 75 keV are reported in at least two
157DY3cG of these references, unless noted otherwise.
157DY DG E$Evaluator has interpreted the general statement of 1972To05
157DY2DG that DE=0.1 keV below 600 keV and 0.2 keV above but weak
157DY3DG transitions and closely spaced ones may have larger uncertainties.
157DY cG RI Average of values of 1984Af01, 1972To05, 1977AnYX, and
157DY2cG 1972Vy02.
157DY cG RI Although some |g intensity values are quoted with an
157DY2cG uncertainty of 2-3%, the general spread of the values suggests
157DY3cG a minimum uncertainty of 10%. The evaluator has assigned this
157DY4cG 10% value, or a larger value indicated by the measurement
157DY5cG uncertainty or the spread in values.
157DY cG M From {+157}Dy Adopted |g radiations, but based on
157DY2cG assignments in this {+157}Ho |e decay from 1984Af01 and/or
157DY3cG 1972To05 from subshell ratios or |a{-K}(exp) values.
157DY4cG Normalization of |a{-K}(exp) by 1984Af01 assumes 280 |g is pure
157DY5cG M1, while that of 1972To05 assumes 326 |g in {+157}Tb is E1.
157DY6cG Assignments of 1977AnYX are consistent, unless noted; these are
157DY7cG based on ce data from 1972To05. See also 1972Vy02.
157DY cG MR From 1984Af01.
157DY cG E(U) |g reported only by 1972Vy02.
157DY cG E(V) |g reported only by 1972To05 and 1977AnYX suggests it is
157DY2cG {+159}Ho contaminant.
157DY cG E(X) |g reported only by 1972To05.
157DY cG E(Y) |g reported only by 1977AnYX.
157DY cG E(Z) |g reported only by 1984Af01.
157DY cG M(T) From 1979Al33 as quoted in 1984Af01.
157DY cL E From least-squares fit to |g energies with questionable
157DY2cL |g's excluded.
157DY cL J From {+157}Dy Adopted Levels.
157DY cL J The first three members of the 3/2[532] band were originally
157DY2cL assigned to levels at 401.1, 455, and 526 keV, but are assigned
157DY3cL in {+157}Dy Adopted Levels to other levels.
157DY dL Bandhead is at 199 keV.
157DY dL Bandhead is at 234 keV.
157DY dL Bandhead is at 341 keV.
157DY dL Bandhead is at 896 keV.
157DY dL Lowest identified state is 9/2+ at 162 keV.
157DY dL Bandhead is at 628 keV.
157DY cL E(R) Level reported only by 1984Af01.
157DY cL E(S) Level reported by 1972To05, but not confirmed by 1984Af01
157DY CL BAND(A) 3/2[521] band.
157DY CL BAND(E) 11/2[505] band.
157DY CL BAND(F) K|p=3/2+ band based on 3/2[402] + 3/2[651] states.
157DY CL BAND(G) 5/2[523] band.
157DY CL BAND(L) 5/2[512] band.
157DY CL BAND(P) Positive-parity band with mixture of 3/2[651], 5/2[642],
157DY2cL and 1/2[660].
157DY CL BAND(Q) K|p=3/2- band, quadrupole vibration based on g.s.
157DY DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
157DY cG MR$If no value given it was assumed |d=1.00 for E2/M1, |d=1.00 for
157DY2cG E3/M2 and |d=0.10 for the other multipolarities
157HO P 0.0 7/2- 12.6 M 2 2593 24
157DY N 0.0231 16 0.0231 16 1.0 1.0
157DY cN NR calculated by evaluator to give the sum of |g transition
157DY2cN intensities to the ground state to be 100%. This assumes
157DY3cN that the electron-capture and |b+ decay to the ground state
157DY4cN is negligible. This condition is reasonable since this 2{+nd}
157DY5cN forbidden branch is expected to have log {Ift} of >11.0 and
157DY6cN a corresponding intensity of <0.0001%.
157DY PN 3
157DY G 67.4 1
157DY cG RI very weak (1972To05) and < 3 (1984Af01).
157DY G 121.0 1 13 3 E1 0.185 VC
157DYS G KC=0.1553 22$LC=0.0235 4$MC=0.00515 8
157DYS G NC=0.001172 17$OC=0.0001615 23$PC=7.36E-6 11
157DY cG $E1 |g ray measured and placed by 1972To05 at 406 level but not
157DY2cG confirmed by 1984Af01
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.18 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.18 (1984Af01)
157DY G 131.9 1 4 1
157DY G 163.9 2 16 2 E2+(M1) 0.53 7
157DYS G KC=0.39 11$LC=0.105 33$MC=0.0242 83
157DYS G NC=0.0055 18$OC=7.2E-4 19$PC=2.20E-5 90
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.48 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.33~{I12} (1984Af01)
157DY G 224.6 3 6.9 7 (E1) 0.0359
157DYS G KC=0.0304 5$LC=0.00437 7$MC=0.000954 14
157DYS G NC=0.000218 4$OC=3.09E-5 5$PC=1.556E-6 23
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.05 (1972To02)
157DY G 227.4 2 12.5 12(E1) 0.0348
157DYS G KC=0.0294 5$LC=0.00423 6$MC=0.000923 14
157DYS G NC=0.000211 3$OC=2.99E-5 5$PC=1.509E-6 22
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.023 (1972To02)
157DY G 257.88 5 50 5 E1 0.0252
157DYS G KC=0.0213 3$LC=0.00304 5$MC=0.000664 10
157DYS G NC=0.0001521 22$OC=2.16E-5 3$PC=1.108E-6 16
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.023 (1972To02 - their placement at 406 level was changed to
157DY2cG unplecd by 1984Af01)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.019~{I8} (1984Af01)
157DY G 267.0 4 24 12 U
157DY G 365.1 1 5 3
157DY G 405.9 2 3.4 5
157DYS G KC=0.02134 $ LC=0.00304 $ MC=0.00066 $ NC+=0.00018
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.03 (1972To02, whence M1 or E1)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.09 (1984Af01)
157DY G 416.5 2 2.2 7
157DY G 449.6 2 9.8 13M1,E2 0.0296 95
157DYS G KC=0.0245 86$LC=0.0039 8$MC=0.00087 16
157DYS G NC=0.00020 4$OC=2.9E-5 7$PC=1.45E-6 57
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.029 (1972To02)
157DY G 597.5 3 6 3 (M1) 0.0189
157DYS G KC=0.01602 23$LC=0.00226 4$MC=0.000493 7
157DYS G NC=0.0001141 16$OC=1.677E-5 24$PC=9.76E-7 14
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.017 (1972To02 no multipolarity ADOPTED)
157DY G 610.2 2 6.4 25
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.047 (1972To02)
157DY G 936.4 3 7.0 10
157DY G 946.2 2 8.6 9
157DY G 954.9 2 3.8 8
157DY cG RI from 1972To05; other |< 1.2 (1984Af01).
157DY G 963.0 2 5.3 10
157DY G 969.0 2 3.7 7
157DY cG RI from 1972To05; other: |< 1.5 (1984Af01).
157DY G 1037.2 2 5.7 10 Y
157DY G 1043.8 3 2.0 15
157DY G 1053.7 3 3.7 7
157DY G 1072.6 4 2.6 11
157DY cG RI From 1972To05 and 1977AnYX; other: |< 1.5 (1984Af01).
157DY G 1082.1 3 4.9 10
157DY G 1090.2 3 2.6 6
157DY G 1158.8 2 2.6 10
157DY G 1172.2 2 3.9 11
157DY G 1202.1 2 3.2 6 X
157DY G 1239.7 2 2.8 6 X
157DY G 1274.8 3 6.1 14
157DY G 1298.3 2 3.9 8
157DY cG RI from 1972To05; other: |< 1.7 (1984Af01).
157DY G 1302.9 2 5.6 14
157DY cG RI from 1972To05 and 1984Af01; other: 12.8 {I22} (1977AnYX).
157DY G 1332.5 2 2.4 5 X
157DY dG E evaluator suggests this might be a {+60}Co |g.
157DY G 1349.8 3 5.0 14
157DY G 1358.9 2 3.2 10
157DY G 1395.0 2 1.8 4 X
157DY G 1406.5 2 6.4 21
157DY G 1460.2 2 14 3
157DY dG E evaluator suggests this might be a {+40}K |g.
157DY G 1490.9 2 1.9
157DY G 1510.4 2 2.4
157DY G 1521.9 2 1.7
157DY G 1563.7 2 2.9 X
157DY G 1763.7 5 2.2 11
157DY G 1788.6 2 3.5 13
157DY L 0.0 3/2- A
157DY DL E For 1% EC branch to this level, logft would be 6.75.
157DY L 61.141 13 5/2- 0.3 NS A
157DY cL T From 1980Al07 (and 1979AlZO). Others: 90 ps {I30} from
157DY2cL ce|g coincidences (preliminary value of 1979AbZZ) and |< 0.8
157DY3cL ns from ce-ce coincidences (1972Ki21).
157DY E 0.8 LT 6 LT 5.9 GT 7 LT
157DYS E EAV=684 11$CK=0.739 5$CL=0.1120 8$CM+=0.03295 21
157DY G 61.11 2 235 24M1+E2 0.20 2 10.25 16 C
157DYS G KC=8.10 13$LC=1.67 9$MC=0.377 22
157DYS G NC=0.086 5$OC=0.0119 6$PC=0.000509 8
157DY cG $|a(L)exp=2.18 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=9.1 {I13}, |a(L{-1+2})exp=1.64 {I25}, |a(L{-3})exp=0.30 {I4}
157DY2cG (1984Af01)
157DY L 147.723 9 7/2- 0.3 NS LE A
157DY cL T From 1980Al07 (and 1979AlZO). Others: |< 50 ps from ce|g
157DY2cL coincidences (preliminary value of 1979AbZZ).
157DY G 86.55 2 256 26M1+E2 0.19 2 3.66 C
157DYS G KC=3.00 5$LC=0.518 16$MC=0.115 4
157DYS G NC=0.0265 9$OC=0.00376 11$PC=0.000186 3
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=3.2 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=2.90 {I80}, |a(L{-1+2})exp=0.52 {I8} (1984Af01)
157DY G 147.73 1 90 9 (E2) 0.665 C
157DYS G KC=0.387 6$LC=0.214 3$MC=0.0508 8
157DYS G NC=0.01143 16$OC=0.001408 20$PC=1.718E-5 24
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.41 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.38~{I5} (1984Af01)
157DY L 161.99 3 9/2+ P
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY E 0.56 24 5.3 23 5.93 19 5.9 25
157DYS E EAV=639 11$CK=0.757 4$CL=0.1148 7$CM+=0.03379 20
157DY G 14.23 5 47 7 E1 11.53 20
157DYS G LC=8.99 16$MC=2.05 4
157DYS G NC=0.441 8$OC=0.0456 8$PC=0.001028 17
157DY cG $|a(M{-1-3})exp=1.35 {I51}, |a(M{-4,5})exp =0.30 {I13} (1984Af01)
157DY L 188.035 16 5/2+ 1.1 NS P
157DY cL T from 1980Al07
157DY G 26.07 4 E2 1059 17 135 20 C
157DYS G L/T=0.770 9$M/T=0.183 4
157DYS G N/T=0.0408 9$O/T=0.00476 11$P/T=1.39E-6 4
157DYS G LC=817 13$MC=194 4
157DYS G NC=43.3 7$OC=5.05 8$PC=0.001477 24
157DY cG $|a(L{-2})exp |> 19, |a(L{-3})exp |> 23, |a(M)exp |> 10 (1984Af01)
157DY cG RI Measured value is |< 2 (1984Af01). From I|g(1+|a)(26)
157DY2cG and |a, one deduces 0.12.
157DY cG M The experimental L subshell ratios would allow a large M1
157DY2cG content, but the J|p require pure E2.
157DY cG TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data (1984Af01).
157DY G 126.95 4 13 2 E1 0.1629
157DYS G KC=0.1367 20$LC=0.0206 3$MC=0.00451 7
157DYS G NC=0.001027 15$OC=0.0001418 20$PC=6.52E-6 10
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=1.8, whence M1+E2 |g (1972To02, not ADOPTED)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.20~{I7} (1984Af01)
157DY G 188.05 4 184 18E1 0.0572 C
157DYS G KC=0.0482 7$LC=0.00702 10$MC=0.001535 22
157DYS G NC=0.000351 5$OC=4.93E-5 7$PC=2.42E-6 4
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.046 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.045~{I8} (1984Af01)
157DY L 199.34 11/2- E
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY G 37.36 8 10 LE(E1) 0.804 13 T ?
157DYS G LC=0.629 10$MC=0.1392 22
157DYS G NC=0.0310 5$OC=0.00387 6$PC=0.0001278 19
157DY cG $|a(L{-1})exp |> 0.33 (1984Af01)
157DY G 51.7 1 (E2) 36.3 7 T ?
157DYS G LC=27.9 5$MC=6.70 12
157DYS G NC=1.50 3$OC=0.176 3$PC=0.000187 3
157DY cG RI |g peak obscured by x-ray line.
157DY cG TI$From intensity of M{-2}+M{-3} ce line = 13 {I2} (1984Af01),
157DY2cG I(|g+ce)=73.
157DY L 211.174 18 7/2+ P
157DY G 23.11 5 M1+E2 9.8E+2 96 30 6
157DYS G L/T=0.77 51$M/T=0.18 23
157DYS G N/T=0.041 55$O/T=0.0048 65$P/T=6.1E-6 68
157DYS G LC=7.6E+2 74$MC=1.8E+2 18
157DYS G NC=40 39$OC=4.7 45$PC=0.0060 33
157DY cG $|a(L{-2})exp |> 2.3, |a(L{-3})exp |> 2.7, |a(M)exp |> 1.3 (1984Af01)
157DY cG RI Measured value is |< 3. From I(|g+ce) and |a=80-1980 one
157DY2cG deduces 0.01 |< I{-|g} |< 0.44.
157DY cG M 1984Af01 give |d |? 0.23 and thus |a |? 127; however, the
157DY2cG data presented are, in fact, compatable with any E2 content
157DY3cG from 2.5% to 100%; therefore, |a can range from about 80 to
157DY4cG 1980.
157DY cG TI Deduced by evaluator from ce data (1984Af01).
157DY G 49.15 4 36 9 M1+E2 0.14 4 3.8 6 C
157DYS G LC=3.0 4$MC=0.67 10
157DYS G NC=0.154 22$OC=0.021 3$PC=0.000976 17
157DY cG $|a(L{-2})exp=2.2 {I9} (1984Af01)
157DY cG RI From table 2 of 1984Af01; table 1 of same article gives
157DY2cG 13 {I4}.
157DY G 150.05 2 37 4 E1 0.1042 C
157DYS G KC=0.0876 13$LC=0.01299 19$MC=0.00284 4
157DYS G NC=0.000648 9$OC=9.02E-5 13$PC=4.28E-6 6
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.09 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.063~{I25} (1984Af01)
157DY L 234.652 20 (3/2)+ F
157DY G 173.52 2 29 3 E1 0.0707 C
157DYS G KC=0.0596 9$LC=0.00873 13$MC=0.00191 3
157DYS G NC=0.000436 7$OC=6.11E-5 9$PC=2.96E-6 5
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.06 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.12~{I6} (1984Af01)
157DY G 234.61 5 45 5 E1 0.0321 C
157DYS G KC=0.0271 4$LC=0.00389 6$MC=0.000850 12
157DYS G NC=0.000195 3$OC=2.76E-5 4$PC=1.397E-6 20
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.05 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.036~{I14} (1984Af01)
157DY L 257.577 18 9/2- A
157DY G 109.86 2 28 3 M1+E2 1.87 5 C
157DYS G KC=1.21 33$LC=0.51 29$MC=0.120 71
157DYS G NC=0.027 16$OC=0.0034 18$PC=6.6E-5 30
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=1.02 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=1.75~{I37} (1984Af01)
157DY G 196.41 4 29 3 E2 0.251 C
157DYS G KC=0.1674 24$LC=0.0646 9$MC=0.01515 22
157DYS G NC=0.00342 5$OC=0.000432 6$PC=7.96E-6 12
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.15 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.13~{I4} (1984Af01)
157DY L 273.72 7 ?
157DY2 L FLAG=S
157DY G 273.8 2 13.5 14 ?
157DY L 341.118 14 5/2- 0.3 NS LE G
157DY cL T quoted by 1980Al07
157DY E 2202 50 3.5 4 53 5 4.86 4 56 5 C
157DYS E EAV=560 11$CK=0.783 4$CL=0.1192 6$CM+=0.03510 17
157DY G 106.48 4 40 4 E1 0.261 C
157DYS G KC=0.218 3$LC=0.0336 5$MC=0.00736 11
157DYS G NC=0.001671 24$OC=0.000229 4$PC=1.015E-5 15
157DY cG $|a(L)exp|<0.12 (1984Af01)
157DY G 129.95 2 39 4 E1 0.1530 C
157DYS G KC=0.1284 18$LC=0.0193 3$MC=0.00423 6
157DYS G NC=0.000963 14$OC=0.0001331 19$PC=6.15E-6 9
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.13~{I4} (1984Af01)
157DY G 153.09 1 135 14E1 0.0987 C
157DYS G KC=0.0830 12$LC=0.01229 18$MC=0.00269 4
157DYS G NC=0.000614 9$OC=8.55E-5 12$PC=4.06E-6 6
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.10 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.081~{I19} (1984Af01)
157DY G 193.41 4 320 32M1 0.372 C
157DYS G KC=0.314 5$LC=0.0457 7$MC=0.01004 14
157DYS G NC=0.00232 4$OC=0.000340 5$PC=1.95E-5 3
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.38 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.35~{I5} (1984Af01)
157DY G 279.97 1 1000 50M1 0.1359 C
157DYS G KC=0.1147 16$LC=0.01655 24$MC=0.00363 5
157DYS G NC=0.000840 12$OC=0.0001231 18$PC=7.09E-6 10
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.12 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.123~{I13} (1984Af01)
157DY cG RI The four references use different conventions on the
157DY2cG uncertainty for this reference |g. The evaluator has arbitrarily
157DY3cG assigned a 5% uncertainty.
157DY G 341.16 6 770 77M1,E2 0.062 19 C
157DYS G KC=0.051 18$LC=0.0088 9$MC=0.00197 16
157DYS G NC=0.00045 4$OC=6.4E-5 9$PC=3.0E-6 12
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.068 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.062~{I9} (1984Af01)
157DY L 400.92 10 11/2- A
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY G 143.5 5 3.5 12 Z
157DY G 253.2 1 7.2 2
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.15, whence M1 or E1 (1972To02; however 253|g placed by
157DY2cG 1972To02 at 527 level was relocated by 1984Af01 at 401 level)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.093~{I42} (1984Af01)
157DY L 401.17 7
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY G 340.5 5 15 5 ZC
157DY G 401.6 3 2.0 6 Z
157DY L 405.66 5 (5/2)+ ?
157DY2 L FLAG=S
157DY cL J$Possible E1, 121|g from 5/2-,7/2- level in 1972To05 but placement not
157DY2cL confirmed by 1984Af01
157DY L 419.929 22 7/2- G
157DY E 0.40 5 7.6 9 5.67 5 8.0 9
157DYS E EAV=525 11$CK=0.793 3$CL=0.1209 5$CM+=0.03560 15
157DY G 78.89 5 2.3 5 M1,E2 5.7 10 C
157DYS G KC=2.9 11$LC=2.1 16$MC=0.51 38
157DYS G NC=0.114 84$OC=0.0140 96$PC=1.65E-4 85
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=4.2 {I18} (1984Af01)
157DY G 162.35 2 62 6 M1(+E2) 0.54 7 C
157DYS G KC=0.40 11$LC=0.109 35$MC=0.0251 87
157DYS G NC=0.0057 19$OC=7.5E-4 20$PC=2.25E-5 92
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.66 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.53~{I13} (1984Af01)
157DY G 208.70 6 56 6 E1 0.0435 C
157DYS G KC=0.0367 6$LC=0.00531 8$MC=0.001160 17
157DYS G NC=0.000266 4$OC=3.74E-5 6$PC=1.87E-6 3
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.05 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.044~{I13} (1984Af01)
157DY cG E This is placement of 1972To05; 1977AnYX suggest alternate
157DY2cG placement from 897 level.
157DY G 272.17 8 189 19M1+E2 0.117 30 C
157DYS G KC=0.094 30$LC=0.0179 3$MC=0.00404 14
157DYS G NC=0.000925 23$OC=0.000128 6$PC=5.5E-6 22
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.10 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.120~{I26} (1984Af01)
157DY G 358.75 10 31 6 M1,E2 0.054 17 C
157DYS G KC=0.044 15$LC=0.0076 10$MC=0.00169 18
157DYS G NC=0.00039 5$OC=5.5E-5 9$PC=2.6E-6 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.059 (1972To02, for pure M1)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.044~{I18} (1984Af01)
157DY G 420.0 1 12.2 12E2 0.0242 C
157DYS G KC=0.0191 3$LC=0.00395 6$MC=0.000897 13
157DYS G NC=0.000205 3$OC=2.78E-5 4$PC=1.049E-6 15
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.014 (1972To02)
157DY L 428.43 7
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY G 367.2 1 14 3 C
157DY G 428.2 2 7.6 15
157DY L 455.91 11
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY cL E Level given in 1984Af01 as 457.2, but |g energies there
157DY2cL are not consistent with that value.
157DY G 55.6 ?
157DY3 G FL=401.17
157DY cG E |g shown in decay scheme of 1984Af01, but not in |g list.
157DY G 269.3 1 8.3 8 & ?
157DY2 G FL=188.035
157DY cG E Very poor energy fit.
157DY G 395.6 3 2.9 7 Z
157DY L 508.23 5 7/2-,5/2-
157DY E 0.24 4 6.0 8 5.74 6 6.2 8
157DYS E EAV=487 11$CK=0.8025 25$CL=0.1225 5$CM+=0.03610 13
157DY G 251.5 5 7 3 Z
157DY G 297.00 10 35 4 E1 0.01764 C
157DYS G KC=0.01494 21$LC=0.00211 3$MC=0.000461 7
157DYS G NC=0.0001058 15$OC=1.509E-5 22$PC=7.87E-7 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.015 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.027 (1984Af01)
157DY G 320.2 1 80 20E1 0.01464 C
157DYS G KC=0.01241 18$LC=0.001747 25$MC=0.000381 6
157DYS G NC=8.75E-5 13$OC=1.251E-5 18$PC=6.58E-7 10
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.014 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.028 (1984Af01)
157DY G 360.54 10 26 3 M1,E2 0.053 16 C
157DYS G KC=0.044 15$LC=0.0075 10$MC=0.00167 18
157DYS G NC=0.00038 5$OC=5.4E-5 9$PC=2.6E-6 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.058 (1972To02, for pure M1)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.044~{I18} (1984Af01)
157DY G 447.3 5 4 2 ZC
157DY G 508.3 2 132 13E2(+M1) 0.0215 70
157DYS G KC=0.0179 63$LC=0.0028 7$MC=0.00062 13
157DYS G NC=0.00014 3$OC=2.0E-5 5$PC=1.06E-6 41
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.012 (1972To02)
157DY L 518.56 10 9/2- G
157DY G 98.7 1 4 2 M1(+E2) 2.67 19 C
157DYS G KC=1.63 47$LC=0.80 50$MC=0.19 13
157DYS G NC=0.043 27$OC=0.0053 31$PC=8.9E-5 42
157DY cG $|a(L{-1})exp=0.60 {I35} (1984Af01)
157DY G 260.7 2 2.7 9 Z
157DY L 526.92 6 5/2-,7/2-
157DY G 71.1 1 1.6 4 M1(+E2) 8.2 19
157DYS G KC=3.8 16$LC=3.4 27$MC=0.81 64
157DYS G NC=0.18 15$OC=0.022 17$PC=2.2E-4 12
157DY cG $|a(L{-1})exp=1.29 {I65} (1984Af01)
157DY G 125.76 5 4.6 8 E2 1.175
157DY3 G FL=401.17
157DYS G KC=0.612 9$LC=0.434 7$MC=0.1034 15
157DYS G NC=0.0232 4$OC=0.00283 4$PC=2.62E-5 4
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.52~{I26} (1984Af01)
157DY G 269.3 1 8.3 8 &C
157DY G 379.12 8 6.6 7 (M1+E0) C
157DY cG M Assigned M1+E0 by 1977AnYX from |a{-K}(exp)=0.59 {I16}
157DY2cG compared to |a{-K}(M1)=0.060, but 1972To05 report this ce line
157DY3cG contains other contributions and do not report an |a{-K}(exp).
157DY G 466.1 2 7.4 10M1 0.0356 C
157DYS G KC=0.0301 5$LC=0.00427 6$MC=0.000936 14
157DYS G NC=0.000216 3$OC=3.18E-5 5$PC=1.84E-6 3
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.045 (1972To02)
157DY G 527.4 6 2.0
157DY L 611.22 7 (7/2,9/2)-
157DY2 L FLAG=R
157DY G 210.5 5 3.5 10 Z
157DY3 G FL=400.92
157DY G 353.80 10 9.6 10E2,M1 0.056 17
157DYS G KC=0.046 16$LC=0.0079 10$MC=0.00177 17
157DYS G NC=0.00041 5$OC=5.7E-5 9$PC=2.7E-6 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.042 (1972To02)
157DY G 400.2 2 8.2 8 E1 0.00856
157DYS G KC=0.00727 11$LC=0.001010 15$MC=0.000220 3
157DYS G NC=5.06E-5 8$OC=7.28E-6 11$PC=3.91E-7 6
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.052 (1972To02)
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.015 (1984Af01)
157DY G 463.3 1 14.3 14 &C
157DY cG M Assigned M1 which is suitable for both placements.
157DY G 550.1 2 8.2 25 C
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.028 (1972To02, whence M1+E2 or E1)
157DY L 628.87 7 3/2- Q
157DY G 394.2 1 3.0 8
157DY G 567.7 2 7.5 15
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.014 (1972To02, whence E1 or E2)
157DY G 628.2 5 8.0
157DY cG E,RI From 1977AnYX. 1984Af01 do not report this |g line and
157DY2cG 1972To05 report a complex line at 627 keV.
157DY L 688.11 10 (7/2)- Q
157DY G 347.1 2 4 2 C
157DY G 430.3 2 6.4 18(M1) 0.0437
157DYS G KC=0.0370 6$LC=0.00527 8$MC=0.001153 17
157DYS G NC=0.000267 4$OC=3.92E-5 6$PC=2.27E-6 4
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.051 (1972To02, whence M1 (or E1))
157DY G 540.5 2 5.2 9 C
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.025 (1972To02, whence M1+E2 or E1)
157DY G 626.8 3 8 2 ?
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.022 (1972To02, no multipolariry ADOPTED)
157DY cG E,RI 1977AnYX report intensity for |g at 626.6 keV, 1972To05
157DY2cG assert that their peak at 627.0 is a multiplet, and 1984Af01
157DY3cG give I{-|g} |< 5 for 627.0 line.
157DY cG M Assigned (M1+E0) by 1977AnYX, I{-|g} in question.
157DY G 688.1 2 21 3 E2 0.00691
157DYS G KC=0.00570 8$LC=0.000941 14$MC=0.000209 3
157DYS G NC=4.81E-5 7$OC=6.79E-6 10$PC=3.26E-7 5
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0063 (1972To02)
157DY L 896.57 4 (5/2)- L
157DY E 0.093 20 12 2 5.26 8 12 2
157DYS E EAV=316 11$CK=0.8270 8$CL=0.12758 22$CM+=0.03764 7
157DY G 377.7 1 0.3 1 X ?
157DY G 388.4 1 20 2 M1+E2 0.044 14 C
157DYS G KC=0.036 13$LC=0.0060 9$MC=0.00134 18
157DYS G NC=0.00031 5$OC=4.4E-5 8$PC=2.12E-6 85
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.033 (1972To02)
157DY G 468.0 1 6.7 10
157DY G 476.7 1 24.3 24M1,E2 0.0254 82 C
157DYS G KC=0.0211 74$LC=0.0033 7$MC=0.00074 15
157DYS G NC=0.00017 4$OC=2.4E-5 6$PC=1.25E-6 49
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.023 (1972To02)
157DY G 555.5 2 130 13M1 0.0227 C
157DYS G KC=0.0193 3$LC=0.00272 4$MC=0.000594 9
157DYS G NC=0.0001375 20$OC=2.02E-5 3$PC=1.174E-6 17
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.033 (1972To02)
157DY G 661.9 1 14 2 E1 0.00281 C
157DYS G KC=0.00240 4$LC=0.000324 5$MC=7.05E-5 10
157DYS G NC=1.624E-5 23$OC=2.36E-6 4$PC=1.322E-7 19
157DY cG $|a(K)exp|<0.0035 (1972To02)
157DY G 685.4 2 36 5 (E1) 0.00261 C
157DYS G KC=0.00223 4$LC=0.000301 5$MC=6.55E-5 10
157DYS G NC=1.508E-5 22$OC=2.19E-6 3$PC=1.232E-7 18
157DY G 708.6 1 60 6 E1 0.00244 C
157DYS G KC=0.00208 3$LC=0.000281 4$MC=6.11E-5 9
157DYS G NC=1.407E-5 20$OC=2.05E-6 3$PC=1.152E-7 17
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0016 (1972To02)
157DY G 749.0 2 9 3 (M1) 0.01076 C
157DYS G KC=0.00913 13$LC=0.001275 18$MC=0.000278 4
157DYS G NC=6.44E-5 9$OC=9.48E-6 14$PC=5.54E-7 8
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.012 (1972To02)
157DY G 835.30 10 47 5 M1,E2 0.0063 19 C
157DYS G KC=0.0054 17$LC=7.8E-4 20$MC=0.00017 5
157DYS G NC=3.93E-5 99$OC=5.7E-6 16$PC=3.2E-7 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0057 (1972To02)
157DY G 896.6 1 176 18M1,E2 0.0054 16
157DYS G KC=0.0045 14$LC=6.5E-4 17$MC=0.00014 4
157DYS G NC=3.3E-5 9$OC=4.8E-6 13$PC=2.70E-7 86
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0041 (1972To02)
157DY L 990.12 6 7/2- L
157DY E 0.015 3 3.3 3 5.77 5 3.3 3
157DYS E EAV=275 11$CK=0.8294 5$CL=0.12836 19$CM+=0.03789 6
157DY G 463.3 1 14.3 14 &
157DY2 G FL=526.92
157DY cG M$Assigned M1 which is suitable for both placements.
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.047 (1972To02)
157DY G 570.2 1 26 5 M1 0.0213 C
157DY2 G FL=419.929
157DYS G KC=0.0180 3$LC=0.00254 4$MC=0.000556 8
157DYS G NC=0.0001286 18$OC=1.89E-5 3$PC=1.099E-6 16
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.031 (1972To02)
157DY G 648.8 4 14 3 (M1) 0.01537 C
157DYS G KC=0.01303 19$LC=0.00183 3$MC=0.000400 6
157DYS G NC=9.25E-5 13$OC=1.360E-5 20$PC=7.93E-7 12
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.011 (1972To02)
157DY G 779.0 2 20.4 22E1 0.00202 C
157DY2 G FL=211.174
157DYS G KC=0.001723 25$LC=0.000231 4$MC=5.02E-5 7
157DYS G NC=1.158E-5 17$OC=1.686E-6 24$PC=9.56E-8 14
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.002 (1972To02)
157DY G 801.7 4 2.1 7 Z
157DY2 G FL=188.035
157DY G 828.1 2 26 3 (E1) 0.00179
157DY2 G FL=161.99
157DYS G KC=0.001528 22$LC=0.000204 3$MC=4.44E-5 7
157DYS G NC=1.024E-5 15$OC=1.492E-6 21$PC=8.49E-8 12
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.002 (1972To02)
157DY G 842.4 3 11 3 M1,E2 0.0062 19 C
157DY2 G FL=147.723
157DYS G KC=0.0052 16$LC=7.6E-4 20$MC=0.00017 5
157DYS G NC=3.84E-5 97$OC=5.6E-6 15$PC=3.1E-7 11
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.011 (1972To02)
157DY G 928.9 1 26 3 M1,E2 0.0049 14 C
157DY2 G FL=61.141
157DYS G KC=0.0042 12$LC=0.00060 15$MC=0.00013 4
157DYS G NC=3.0E-5 8$OC=4.4E-6 12$PC=2.49E-7 78
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0045 (1972To02)
157DY L 1211.13 5 5/2-,7/2-
157DY E 0.0029 10 4.7 5 5.48 5 4.7 5
157DYS E EAV=177 11$CK=0.8312$CL=0.12984 15$CM+=0.03838 6
157DY G 522.8 1 5.9 9 ?
157DY G 582.2 1 4.4 16
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.011 (1972To02, no multipolarity deduced)
157DY G 600.4 5 5.6 14 Z
157DY G 703.0 2 8.5 14M1,E2 0.0096 30 ?
157DYS G KC=0.0081 27$LC=0.00119 31$MC=0.00026 7
157DYS G NC=6.0E-5 15$OC=8.8E-6 24$PC=4.8E-7 17
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.012 (1972To02)
157DY G 791.0 2 11.2 22M1,E2 0.0072 22 C
157DYS G KC=0.0061 19$LC=8.9E-4 23$MC=0.00019 5
157DYS G NC=4.5E-5 12$OC=6.5E-6 18$PC=3.6E-7 13
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.008 (1972To02)
157DY G 870.1 1 39 4 M1 0.00744 C
157DYS G KC=0.00632 9$LC=0.000878 13$MC=0.000192 3
157DYS G NC=4.44E-5 7$OC=6.53E-6 10$PC=3.82E-7 6
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0071 (1972To02)
157DY G 1063.3 3 5.6 10 C
157DY G 1150.0 1 36 4 M1,E2 0.0030 8 C
157DYS G KC=0.00258 65$LC=0.00036 9$MC=7.9E-5 18
157DYS G NC=1.8E-5 5$OC=2.7E-6 7$PC=1.53E-7 42$IPC=1.70E-6 13
157DY G 1211.1 1 103 10M1,E2 0.0027 7
157DYS G KC=0.0023 6$LC=0.00032 8$MC=7.0E-5 16
157DYS G NC=1.6E-5 4$OC=2.4E-6 6$PC=1.36E-7 36$IPC=7.0E-6 6
157DY cG $|a(K)exp=0.0024 (1972To02)
157DY L 1380.24 11 (5/2,7/2-)
157DY E 1.1 2 5.99 9 1.1 2
157DYS E CK=0.8303 3$CL=0.13094 18$CM+=0.03876 6
157DY G 1039.0 4 4.1 15
157DY G 1169.9 3 9.8 25
157DY G 1191.9 2 6.7 14
157DY G 1232.6 4 3.5 10 C
157DY G 1319.0 3 7.9 15
157DY G 1380.2 2 14 3