152DY    156ER A DECAY                                           13NDS    201311
152DY  H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
156ER  P 0            0+               19.5 M    10              3541     10
156ER cP $Q is from E|a=3450~{I10} (2002KaZR). 2012Wa38 give 3487~{I25} based on
156ER2cP an input of E|a=3030~{I70} (1995KaZS). Other values of E|a are
156ER3cP 3300~{I70} (1992KaZP) and 3450~{I15} (1996ByZY). The value of 1998KaZS
156ER4cP appears to be discrepant. Note that an |a branch to the 614~{I2}+ level
156ER5cP would have E|a=2852 and from systematics of hindrance factors would
156ER6cP have an intensity approximately 10|*10{+-6} that of the branch to the
156ER7cP g.s.
152DY  N                        1.2E-7 3
152DY cN BR$The literature values are inconsistent. Values in increasing order
152DY2cN are 5|*10{+-8}~{I2} (1995KaZS), 1.2|*10{+-7}~{I3} (1996ByZY),
152DY3cN 5|*10{+-7}~{I2} (1992KaZP), and 1.0|*10{+-6} (2002KaZR). The radius
152DY4cN parameters calculated with these intensities are 1.480~{I25},
152DY5cN 1.527~{I17}, 1.603~{I26}, and 1.641~{I11}, respectively. r{-0} values
152DY6cN for 148 Dy and 150 Dy are 1.527~{I4} and 1.551~{I24}, respectively.
152DY7cN From systematics of r{-0} values in adjacent nuclides, the evaluator
152DY8cN judges that the most likely value for {+152}Dy is the one resulting
152DY9cN from the |a branching of 1996ByZY
152DY cA HF$r{-0}=1.527~{I17}
152DY  L 0            0+
152DY  A 3450      10 100       1.000
152DY cA E$2002KaZR