155GD 155TB EC DECAY 1976ME10 19NDS 201911
155GD H TYP=FMT$AUT=C. Morse$DAT=31-Jan-2025$COM=Moved NOT mults to comments
155GD H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 160, 1 (2019)$CUT=21-Oct-2019$
155GD D DATA SET UPDATED (MAY, 2003) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE ^DDEP-RELATED
155GD2D MR'S AND RELATED CC VALUES FROM 155EU B- DECAY, REVISED MR VALUES
155GD3D FOR OTHER |g's, T VALUES FOR TWO EXCITED STATES, AND ADDITIONAL
155GD4D COMMENTS.
155GD d According to reviewe's comments (2018) I (NN) recalculated all
155GD2d |d values and I removed DDEP reference
155GD c The decay scheme is due primarily to 1976Me10. However, using the
155GD2c results of the (n,|g) study of 1986Sc25 (see {+154}Gd(n,|g) dataset
155GD3c for details about this article), the evaluator has chosen to
155GD3c eliminate several of the levels proposed by 1976Me10 and to change the
155GD4c placement of some of their |g rays.
155GD c 1976Me10: chemical and isotope separated sources. |g radiation studied
155GD2c using Ge(Li), LEPS and Compton-suppression detectors. ce spectra
155GD3c studied using a 2-mm |* 1-cm{+2} Si(Li) detector. Measured E|g,I|g,
155GD4c Ice, |a.
155GD c Other studies include: |g(|q) in nuclear orientation (1996KrZZ,
155GD2c 1980Bu27, 1975Wa01); electron spectra using magnetic spectrometers
155GD3c and spectrographs (1962Ha24, 1967Ko12, 1969Ga28, 1975Ch04, 1980Ab20).
155GD4c |g radiation using various Ge detectors (1969Me09 (includes one of
155GD5c the authors of 1976Me10), 1969Ga28, 1980Ab20). E0 admixtures are
155GD6c discussed by, e. g., 1986AbZW.
155GD cG RI I(Gd K x rays)=4654 {I100}, relative to
155GD2cG I|g(105.32|g)=1000 (1976Me10)
155GD cG M(M) Deduced by 1976Me10 from comparison of L-subshell ratios
155GD2cG given in 1962Ha24 and 1967Ko12 with theoretical values
155GD cG E(F) From 1962Ha24 or 1967Ko12
155GD cG M,MR Unless otherwise noted, reported by 1976Me10 and based on
155GD2cG measured |a (mostly |a(K)exp) values. In normalizing the measured
155GD3cG electron-line intensities to those of the |g-ray lines, 1976Me10 used
155GD4cG |a(K)=0.118 for the theoretical M1 K-conversion coefficient of the
155GD5cG 262.27 |g transition. This multipolarity is established independently
155GD6cG from a variety of sources. Included among these are |a(K)exp values
155GD7cG (1969Ga28,1967Bl11) and |g(|q) (1975Wa01). Such studies, of
155GD8cG course, cannot exclude a small admixture of E2.
155GD cG E(a)$Two |g rays, 474.53 {I17} and 484.85 {I11}, were found and placed
155GD2cG at 592.5 level in (p,d),(p,d|g) dataset (2010Al15)
155GD cL E$Listed values were calculated from a least-squares fit of the |g-ray
155GD2cL energies. |h{+2} norm = 12.4 greater than |h{+2} critical = 1.4
155GD cL 1976Me10 report levels at 346.06 (J|p=(5/2-)), 488.65
155GD2cL (J|p=(5/2)-), 423.22 (J|p=1/2-) and 721.06 (J|p=3/2,5/2+). The first
155GD3cL two of these were shown to deexcite via only one transition each, and
155GD4cL these were placed elsewhere in the level scheme from the (n,|g) study
155GD5cL of 1986Sc25. The third of these was assigned by 1976Me10 as the
155GD6cL bandhead of the 1/2[530] band. 1986Sc25, however, place this 1/2-
155GD7cL level, and one of its two proposed deexciting |g's, elsewhere in the
155GD8cL scheme. Additionally, 1986Sc25 propose a 454.47 level that is not
155GD9cL reported by 1976Me10. Inspection of the |g branching from this level
155GDKcL reveals that some of the |g's reported by 1976Me10 to deexcite their
155GDScL 721 level are associated with the decay of this 454 level. The
155GDNcL evaluator has not included the 346, 423, 488.65 and 721 levels but has
155GDJcL incorporated the 454 in the decay scheme given here.
155GD cL J From adopted values
155GD CL BAND(A)$g.s. band. Conf=3/2(521)
155GD CL BAND(B)$3/2[651] band. This band is strongly Coriolis mixed with other
155GD2cL Nilsson states originating from the i13/2 spherical shell-model state,
155GD3cL as well as |DN=2 mixed with 3/2[402].
155GD CL BAND(C)$5/2[642] band. This band is strongly Coriolis mixed with other
155GD2cL Nilsson states originating from the i13/2 spherical shell-model state.
155GD CL BAND(D)$3/2[402] band. |DN=2 mixed with 3/2[651].
155GD CL BAND(E)$3/2[532] band.
155GD CL BAND(W)$Head of 5/2[523] band
155GD CL BAND(G)$1/2[400] band.
155GD CL BAND(H)$1/2[530] band member
155GD CL BAND(J)$K{+|p}=1/2- band. Contains 1/2[521] and the K-2 |g vibration
155GD2cL built on the g.s. band.
155GD CL BAND(K)$K{+|p}=3/2- band. |b vibration built on the g.s. band.
155GD DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
155GD2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
155GD DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
155TB P 0.0 3/2+ 5.32 D 6 820 10
155GD N 0.0251 13 0.0251 13 1.0 1.0
155GD cN NR Calculated assuming the |e branching to the g.s.=9% {I5},
155GD2cN deduced by 1976Me10 from the measured K x-ray intensities
155GD PN 3
155GD G 39.8 F
155GD G 40.7 F
155GD G 55.650 80.08 6
155GD cG Shown deexciting the 647.7 level by 1976Me10. 1986Sc25, in
155GD2cG their (n,|g) study, do not report a |g having this energy.
155GD G 79.2 1 LT
155GD cG $Mult: Not E1, from Ice(K)|?0.8, as reported by 1976Me10
155GD G 102.4 1 0.6 2E2,M1 2.09 22
155GDS G KC=1.34 25$LC=0.58 36$MC=0.135 86
155GDS G NC=0.030 19$OC=0.0041 24$PC=8.6E-5 33
155GD G 103.3 1 0.4 2M1 1.83
155GDS G KC=1.549 23$LC=0.224 4$MC=0.0486 7
155GDS G NC=0.01118 16$OC=0.001734 25$PC=0.0001156 17
155GD cG Tentatively placed by 1976Me10 between the 592 and 488.65
155GD2cG levels. This latter level is now not believed to exist, and the |g
155GD3cG branching from the 592 level, as reported by 1986Sc25, does not include
155GD4cG a 103.3 |g.
155GD G 118.0 0.1 LT F
155GD cG 1976Me10 indicate that the existence of this transition is
155GD2cG doubtful
155GD cG $Mult: Not E1, from Ice(K)=0.2 and I|g.
155GD G 125.1 1 0.2 1
155GD G 129.3 1 0.23 16 @
155GD cG RI 1976Me10 report I|g=0.25 {I15} for this |g and suggest two
155GD2cG possible placements for it. A small fraction (0.020 {I4} units) of this
155GD3cG intensity can be associated with the decay of the 450.6 level. The
155GD4cG other placement suggested by 1976Me10 is out of a 721.06 level.
155GD5cG However, such a level is now not believed to be populated in the
155GD6cG {+155}Tb |e decay. It has been assumed here that the remainder of this
155GD7cG 129.3 |g intensity is unplaced.
155GD G 136.2 10.15 10
155GD cG 1976Me10 suggest two placements for this |g, namely out of
155GD2cG the the 423.2 and the 559.3 levels. However, the evaluator has not
155GD3cG adopted the 423.2 level proposed by these authors, and the (n,|g) data
155GD4cG do not find a 136.2 |g that deexcites the 559 level.
155GD G 169.0 1 0.1 1
155GD cG Existence of this |g is questionable (1976Me10)
155GD G 178.0 1 0.3 2
155GD G 185.3 1 0.3 2
155GD G 186.0 1 0.05 5
155GD G 188.3 1 0.10 4
155GD G 191.4 1 0.036 15(M1) 0.323
155GDS G KC=0.273 4$LC=0.0391 6$MC=0.00848 12
155GDS G NC=0.00195 3$OC=0.000303 5$PC=2.03E-5 3
155GD cG Placed between the 614 and 423 levels by 1976Me10. However,
155GD2cG this latter level is now not believed to exist, and the |g branching
155GD3cG from the 614 level, as reported by 1986Sc25, does not include a 191.4
155GDxcG |g.
155GD G 230.2 1 0.07 3
155GD G 246.05 9 0.05 2
155GD cG Shown deexciting the 592 level by 1976Me10
155GD G 248.6 1 0.2 1
155GD G 275.38 8 0.12 5
155GD G 278.6 1 0.1 1
155GD G 294.75 150.05 2
155GD cG Tentatively proposed by 1976Me10 to deexcite a 721.06 level.
155GD2cG However, the evaluator does not regard the evidence for such a level
155GD3cG in the {+155}Tb decay as convincing.
155GD G 303.1 1 0.09 6
155GD G 317.9 10.08 4
155GD cG Shown deexciting a 423.2 level by 1976Me10. However, the
155GD2cG (n,|g) data do not confirm the existence of a level with the properties
155GD3cG proposed by these authors. The evaluator has assumed that such a
155GD4cG level does not exist and thus has shown this |g as being unplaced.
155GD G 328.1 3 0.08 4
155GD G 344.0 9 0.3 3
155GD G 349.1 9 0.039 16
155GD G 396.0 5 0.08 1
155GD G 474.11 15 0.015LE a
155GD G 484.8 1 0.012 6 a
155GD G 493.9 1 0.014 7
155GD G 496.1 10.018 9 ?
155GD cG Shown deexciting a questionable 556.1 level by 1976Me10
155GD G 538.15 3 0.013 8
155GD G 603.25 15 0.03 2
155GD G 615.7 10.08 6
155GD G 634.51 90.037 14
155GD cG 1986Sc25 report a 634.543 |g deexciting a 752.551 level. If
155GD2cG this is the same transition, then the 752.55 level is fed also in
155GD3cG the {+155}Tb |e decay.
155GD L 0.0 3/2- STABLE A
155GD E 9 5 7.44 25
155GDS E CK=0.8285 2$CL=0.13268 15$CM+=0.03885 6
155GD cE IE calculated by 1976Me10 from measured Ice(K) and
155GD2cE |e(K)/|e(total) ratios using K-fluorescence yield |w(K)=0.934 {I22}
155GD L 59.9994 24 5/2- A
155GD E 5.2 5 7.61 5
155GDS E CK=0.8272 3$CL=0.13364 18$CM+=0.03918 6
155GD G 60.012 3 44.2 15M1+E2 -0.198 8 9.14
155GDS G KC=7.25 11$LC=1.47 4$MC=0.329 9
155GDS G NC=0.0749 20$OC=0.0110 3$PC=0.000543 8
155GD cG MR$adopted value. Values calculated by evaluator for this dataset:
155GD2cG 0.165 {I15} from
155GD2cG L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.277 {I28}, L3/L1=0.239 {I24}, M1/L1=0.196
155GD2cG {I20}, M2/L1=0.047 {I5}, M3/L1=0.047 {I5}, N/L1=0.044 {I4} (1967Ko12,
155GD2cG with 10% unc adopted by evalutor);
155GD2cG 0.207 {I12} (1967Ha24) from
155GD2cG L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=0.276 {I28}, L3/L1=0.248 {I25},
155GD2cG M/L1=0.310 {I31}, N/L1=0.114 {I11} (1962Ha24, with 10%
155GD2cG unc adopted by evalutor)
155GD L 86.530 4 5/2+ 6.50 NS 4 B
155GD cL T from the adopted values. This value is based on a number of
155GD2cL studies of both the {+155}Tb |e decay and the {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay.
155GD E 5.9 19 7.52 14
155GDS E CK=0.8265 3$CL=0.13411 19$CM+=0.03934 7
155GD G 26.533 6 15.7 5E1 1.95
155GDS G LC=1.530 22$MC=0.336 5
155GDS G NC=0.0738 11$OC=0.00965 14$PC=0.000328 5
155GD G 86.55 3 1276 25E1 0.431
155GDS G KC=0.360 5$LC=0.0555 8$MC=0.01203 17
155GDS G NC=0.00271 4$OC=0.000394 6$PC=1.97E-5 3
155GD L 105.3140 25 3/2+ 1.16 NS 1 B
155GD cL T from the adopted values. This value is based on a number of
155GD2cL studies of both the {+155}Tb |e decay and the {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay.
155GD E 38 3 6.69 4
155GDS E CK=0.8261 3$CL=0.13447 20$CM+=0.03947 7
155GD G 18.769 15 2.52 15M1+E2 +0.274 4 361 11
155GDS G LC=280 8$MC=64.8 19
155GDS G NC=14.4 4$OC=1.87 6$PC=0.01652 24
155GD cG MR$adopted value. Values calculated by evaluator for this dataset:
155GD2cG 0.274 {I4} from
155GD2cG L1/L1=1.000 {I45}, L2/L1=3.605 {I60}, L3/L1=5.000 {I70} (1975Ch04);
155GD2cG 0.283 {I17} from
155GD2cG L1/L1=1.00 {I10}, L2/L1=3.30 {I33}, L3/L1=4.50 {I45}, M/L1=3.20 {I32},
155GD2cG N/L1=0.750 {I75} (1962Ha24, with 10% unc adopted by evalutor)
155GD G 45.299 5 63.9 8E1 0.437
155GDS G LC=0.343 5$MC=0.0747 11
155GDS G NC=0.01665 24$OC=0.00231 4$PC=9.60E-5 14
155GD G 105.318 3 1000 E1 0.254
155GDS G KC=0.213 3$LC=0.0320 5$MC=0.00693 10
155GDS G NC=0.001567 22$OC=0.000230 4$PC=1.201E-5 17
155GD L 107.532 15 9/2+ B
155GD G 20.999 23 0.065 APE2 2.62E3 170 APM
155GDS G L/T=0.774 8$M/T=0.181 4
155GDS G N/T=0.0400 9$O/T=0.00509 11$P/T=1.51E-6 4
155GDS G LC=2.03E3 3$MC=475 8
155GDS G NC=105.0 16$OC=13.36 20$PC=0.00395 6
155GD cG E from 1975Ch04
155GD cG RI calculated from listed I(|g+ce) and |a(E2)
155GD cG TI estimated from I|g(18.77|g) and Ice ratio from 1962Ha24
155GD L 117.963 5 7/2+ B
155GD G 10.49 4 0.6 2M1+E2 0.033 +9-12 3.3E2 6
155GDS G LC=2.6E2 5$MC=58 11
155GDS G NC=13.2 23$OC=1.9 3$PC=0.0972 18
155GD cG E from 1975Ch04
155GD cG RI calculated from I|g(57.98|g) and the ratio
155GD2cG I|g(10.4|g)/I|g(57.98|g) determined in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay. 1976Me10
155GD3cG report I(|g+ce)|?183, deduced from ce(10.4|g)/ce(31.4|g), as
155GD4cG determined in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay, and I(|g+ce)(31.4|g). This leads
155GDxcG to I|g(10.4|g)|?0.5 in agreement with the listed value.
155GD cG MR$adopted value, calculated by evaluator from subshell ratios
155GD2cG L1/L1=1.0 {I1}, L2/L1=0.28 {I14}, L3/L1=0.27 {I12} (1975Ch04)
155GD G 31.43 9 0.87 20M1+E2 0.370 14 51 3
155GDS G LC=39.2 23$MC=9.1 6
155GDS G NC=2.03 12$OC=0.268 16$PC=0.00336 6
155GD cG RI calculated from I|g(57|g) and ratio I|g(31|g)/I|g(57|g)
155GD2cG measured in {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay (1969Me09)
155GD cG MR$adopted value
155GD G 57.983 5 8.17 22E1 1.238
155GDS G KC=1.020 15$LC=0.1712 24$MC=0.0372 6
155GDS G NC=0.00834 12$OC=0.001181 17$PC=5.31E-5 8
155GD L 146.064 10 7/2- A
155GD G 86.0 2 0.6 M1+E2 -0.184 23 3.15
155GDS G KC=2.59 4$LC=0.436 16$MC=0.096 4
155GDS G NC=0.0220 9$OC=0.00332 11$PC=0.000192 4
155GD cG E from 1962Ha24
155GD cG RI from 1969Ga28. Other: |?0.7, from Ice(K)|?2 (1976Me10).
155GD2cG Note, however, that this value is much smaller than expected from,
155GD3cG e.g., the {+155}Eu |b{+-} decay. From that decay, I|g would be
155GD4cG expected to be |?5.9. Note that the very strong 86.55 |g may have
155GD5cG influenced the value deduced for I|g(86.0 |g) in the {+155}Tb |e decay.
155GD cG MR$adopted value. 0.19 {I4} (1975Kr04, |g|g(|q)) for this dataset
155GD G 146.05 3 1.9 4(E2) 0.649
155GDS G KC=0.398 6$LC=0.194 3$MC=0.0453 7
155GDS G NC=0.01015 15$OC=0.001361 19$PC=2.12E-5 3
155GD L 266.601 6 5/2+ C
155GD E 17.9 10 6.78 3
155GDS E CK=0.8204 5$CL=0.1387 4$CM+=0.04092 13
155GD G 120.6 3 2.74 25E1 0.176 3
155GDS G KC=0.1483 23$LC=0.0219 4$MC=0.00474 8
155GDS G NC=0.001075 17$OC=0.0001586 25$PC=8.51E-6 13
155GD G 148.64 1 105.5 9M1+E2 -0.14 1 0.653
155GDS G KC=0.549 8$LC=0.0812 12$MC=0.0177 3
155GDS G NC=0.00407 6$OC=0.000628 9$PC=4.07E-5 6
155GD cG MR weighted average of -0.14 {I1} (1996KrZZ) and -0.12 {I2}
155GD2cG (1975Wa01). 1976Me10 report |d=0.14 {I4}.
155GD G 159.1 1 0.3 1
155GD G 161.29 1 109.8 11M1+E2 -0.28 +6-7 0.515
155GDS G KC=0.429 8$LC=0.068 3$MC=0.0148 7
155GDS G NC=0.00340 14$OC=0.000518 17$PC=3.15E-5 8
155GD cG MR from 1996KrZZ. Others: -0.47 {I+14-97} (1975Wa01); |?0.31
155GD2cG (1976Me10).
155GD G 180.08 1 297 6M1+E2 -0.214 10 0.380
155GDS G KC=0.319 5$LC=0.0478 7$MC=0.01043 15
155GDS G NC=0.00240 4$OC=0.000368 6$PC=2.35E-5 4
155GD cG MR$weighted average of -0.215 {I14} (1975Wa01), -0.188 {I+16-22}
155GD2cG (1980Bu27),and -0.24 {I2} (1996KrZZ). 1976Me10 list |d=0.18.
155GD G 206.54 2 6.8 5E1 0.0417
155GDS G KC=0.0353 5$LC=0.00500 7$MC=0.001080 16
155GDS G NC=0.000246 4$OC=3.70E-5 6$PC=2.17E-6 3
155GD L 268.582 7 3/2+ D
155GD E 7.1 4 7.18 3
155GDS E CK=0.8203 5$CL=0.1387 4$CM+=0.04094 13
155GD G 150.63 5 1.19 7(E2) 0.583
155GDS G KC=0.363 5$LC=0.1702 24$MC=0.0397 6
155GDS G NC=0.00888 13$OC=0.001194 17$PC=1.95E-5 3
155GD cG E 1976Me10 suggest that this peak may be a doublet. However,
155GD2cG from the |g branching from this level as observed in (n,|g), the I|g
155GD3cG value computed for this |g is 1.04 {I16}, reasonably close to that seen
155GD4cG here. From I|g considerations, then, this peak is probably not a
155GD5cG doublet.
155GD G 163.28 1 176.9 18M1+E2 0.05 4 0.502
155GDS G KC=0.424 6$LC=0.0610 10$MC=0.01326 21
155GDS G NC=0.00305 5$OC=0.000473 7$PC=3.16E-5 5
155GD cG MR weighted average of: 0.03 {I5} (1996KrZZ) and 0.13 {I9}
155GD2cG (1975Wa01). 1976Me10 report |d|?0.1.
155GD G 182.1 1 4.4 2(M1) 0.371
155GDS G KC=0.314 5$LC=0.0449 7$MC=0.00974 14
155GDS G NC=0.00224 4$OC=0.000348 5$PC=2.33E-5 4
155GD G 208.58 5 2.3 5E1 0.0406
155GDS G KC=0.0344 5$LC=0.00487 7$MC=0.001052 15
155GDS G NC=0.000240 4$OC=3.61E-5 5$PC=2.12E-6 3
155GD G 268.56 1 28.3 19E1 0.0211
155GDS G KC=0.0179 3$LC=0.00249 4$MC=0.000539 8
155GDS G NC=0.0001230 18$OC=1.86E-5 3$PC=1.129E-6 16
155GD L 286.944 5 3/2- E
155GD E 1.18 7 7.92 4
155GDS E CK=0.8194 6$CL=0.1394 4$CM+=0.04117 14
155GD G 181.69 9 16.8 2E1 0.0586
155GDS G KC=0.0496 7$LC=0.00707 10$MC=0.001529 22
155GDS G NC=0.000348 5$OC=5.21E-5 8$PC=3.00E-6 5
155GD G 200.411 4 9.16 20E1 0.0452
155GDS G KC=0.0383 6$LC=0.00542 8$MC=0.001171 17
155GDS G NC=0.000267 4$OC=4.01E-5 6$PC=2.34E-6 4
155GD cG MR 1996KrZZ report |d=0.17 {I13}. 1975Wa01 report |d=-0.16
155GDxcG {I12}.
155GD G 226.95 1 5.91 8M1 0.203
155GDS G KC=0.1715 24$LC=0.0244 4$MC=0.00530 8
155GDS G NC=0.001219 17$OC=0.000189 3$PC=1.272E-5 18
155GD G 286.96 1 12.62 25M1+E2 -0.14 5 0.1069 17
155GDS G KC=0.0904 14$LC=0.01289 18$MC=0.00280 4
155GDS G NC=0.000644 9$OC=9.99E-5 14$PC=6.67E-6 11
155GD cG MR from 1996KrZZ. 1975Wa01 report -0.24|<|d|<0.21.
155GD2cG 1976Me10 report |d<0.50.
155GD L 321.293 7 5/2- E
155GD E 0.305 22 8.45 4
155GDS E CK=0.8176 6$CL=0.1408 5$CM+=0.04165 16
155GD G 175.29 2 1.77 18(M1) 0.412
155GDS G KC=0.349 5$LC=0.0499 7$MC=0.01084 16
155GDS G NC=0.00249 4$OC=0.000387 6$PC=2.59E-5 4
155GD G 203.37 21.15 12
155GD G 216.02 55.4 4
155GD G 234.78 11.32 8
155GD G 261.25 1 1.58 25(M1) 0.1384
155GDS G KC=0.1172 17$LC=0.01662 24$MC=0.00361 5
155GDS G NC=0.000830 12$OC=0.0001289 18$PC=8.67E-6 13
155GD L 326.017 8 5/2+ D
155GD E 0.66 5 8.10 4
155GDS E CK=0.8173 7$CL=0.1410 5$CM+=0.04172 16
155GD G 208.05 5 9.2 5M1 0.257
155GDS G KC=0.217 3$LC=0.0310 5$MC=0.00673 10
155GDS G NC=0.001550 22$OC=0.000241 4$PC=1.614E-5 23
155GD G 218.4 10.3 2 ?
155GD G 220.70 5 20.24 20M1(+E2) -0.1 3 0.218 8
155GDS G KC=0.184 10$LC=0.0264 12$MC=0.0057 4
155GDS G NC=0.00132 7$OC=0.000205 7$PC=1.37E-5 10
155GD cG MR from 1975Wa01. 1976Me10 report |d|<0.33.
155GD G 239.45 1 9.03 8M1(+E2) 0.0 +2-3 0.175 4
155GDS G KC=0.148 3$LC=0.0211 4$MC=0.00457 9
155GDS G NC=0.001053 18$OC=0.0001635 25$PC=1.10E-5 3
155GD cG MR from 1975Wa01. 1996KrZZ report |d=0.0 {I+5-2} or 1.5
155GD2cG {I+11-8}. 1976Me10 report |d|<0.25.
155GD G 266.02 80.11 1
155GD L 350.313 17 7/2+ C
155GD G 232.33 2 0.69 8(M1) 0.190
155GDS G KC=0.1609 23$LC=0.0229 4$MC=0.00497 7
155GDS G NC=0.001143 16$OC=0.0001776 25$PC=1.193E-5 17
155GD G 242.80 2 0.62 3E2(+M1) 0.14 3
155GDS G KC=0.11 3$LC=0.0223 21$MC=0.0050 6
155GDS G NC=0.00113 12$OC=0.000166 9$PC=7.9E-6 27
155GD G 245.00 9 0.11 6 ?
155GD G 290.2 1 0.08 3 & ?
155GD L 367.512 6 1/2+ G
155GD E 7.1 4 6.99 4
155GDS E CK=0.8145 8$CL=0.1430 6$CM+=0.04243 20
155GD G 80.6 1 0.6 4(E1) 0.521
155GDS G KC=0.435 7$LC=0.0678 10$MC=0.01470 22
155GDS G NC=0.00331 5$OC=0.000479 7$PC=2.36E-5 4
155GD G 99.02 253.46 15M1 2.07 4 M
155GDS G KC=1.75 3$LC=0.253 4$MC=0.0549 9
155GDS G NC=0.01263 20$OC=0.00196 3$PC=0.0001305 21
155GD G 262.27 1 210.6 21M1(+E2) -0.06 +8-6 0.1368
155GDS G KC=0.1158 17$LC=0.01645 23$MC=0.00357 5
155GDS G NC=0.000822 12$OC=0.0001276 18$PC=8.57E-6 13
155GD cG MR from 1975Wa01.
155GD G 281.06 1 12.05 15E2 0.0738
155GDS G KC=0.0558 8$LC=0.01400 20$MC=0.00318 5
155GDS G NC=0.000719 10$OC=0.0001016 15$PC=3.44E-6 5
155GD G 367.36 1 31 5E1+M2 0.04 AP 0.00999AP @
155GDS G KC AP 0.00850$LC AP 0.001173$MC AP 0.000253
155GDS G NC AP 5.80E-5$OC AP 8.85E-6$PC AP 5.55E-7
155GD cG RI computed by the evaluator using I|g(367.3|g)/I|g(262.7|g)
155GD2cG from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(262.2|g), with the
155GD3cG result then scaled up so that the summed |g intensity for the two
155GD4cG placements equals 90, the value (92.3 {I8}) given by 1976Me10 for
155GD5cG their 367.36 |g, after removal of the contribution (2.0) of a 367.9 |g
155GD6cG seen in (n,|g) but not reported by 1976Me10 (see comment on the 367.9
155GD7cG |g from the 454.4 level). Note that the split reported by these
155GD8cG authors (|?37) agrees well with that given here, but they associate it
155GD9cG with the other placement (out of the 427.2 level) of this |g.
155GD L 427.211 5 3/2+ G
155GD E 4.7 4 7.03 5
155GDS E CK=0.8094 11$CL=0.1469 8$CM+=0.0438 3
155GD G 59.63 0.85 15E2(+M1) 0.50 GE 14.7 39
155GDS G KC=4.9 18$LC=7.6 43$MC=1.8 11
155GDS G NC=0.40 23$OC=0.052 29$PC=3.4E-4 16
155GD cG E from 1967Ko12
155GD cG RI from I|g(59.6|g)/I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g) as given in the Adopted
155GD2cG Levels, Gammas data set and from I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g) reported here,
155GD3cG one computes I|g(59.6|g)=1.1 {I4}. 1976Me10 give I|g(59.6|g)<1. The
155GD4cG listed value represents a reasonable combination of these two.
155GD G 101.16 1 6.4 4M1+E2 0.50 AP 2.04 AP
155GDS G KC AP 1.541$LC AP 0.388$MC AP 0.0880
155GDS G NC AP 0.0199$OC AP 0.00284$PC AP 0.0001093
155GD G 158.57 5 1.73 9(M1) 0.545
155GDS G KC=0.461 7$LC=0.0661 10$MC=0.01436 21
155GDS G NC=0.00330 5$OC=0.000513 8$PC=3.43E-5 5
155GD G 160.51 1031.1 6M1(+E2) 0.50 3 M
155GDS G KC=0.37 8$LC=0.097 33$MC=0.0220 82
155GDS G NC=0.0050 18$OC=7.0E-4 21$PC=2.48E-5 84
155GD G 309.21 30.19 3
155GD G 321.83 1 7.2 3M1+E2 0.77 AP 0.0679 AP
155GDS G KC AP 0.0562$LC AP 0.00914$MC AP 0.00201
155GDS G NC AP 0.000460$OC AP 6.95E-5$PC AP 4.00E-6
155GD cG MR 1996KrZZ report -5.2|<|d|<-0.5.
155GD G 340.67 1 47.1 9M1(+E2) 0.02 7 0.0683
155GDS G KC=0.0579 9$LC=0.00814 12$MC=0.001765 25
155GDS G NC=0.000406 6$OC=6.32E-5 9$PC=4.26E-6 7
155GD cG MR 1976Me10 report |d<0.50. 1975Wa01 report |d=2.5 {I+5-4}
155GD G 367.36 1 59 7E1 0.00967 @
155GDS G KC=0.00823 12$LC=0.001129 16$MC=0.000243 4
155GDS G NC=5.57E-5 8$OC=8.50E-6 12$PC=5.32E-7 8
155GD cG RI computed by the evaluator using
155GD2cG I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g)/I|g(367.2|g) from the Adopted Levels, Gammas data
155GD3cG set and I|g(160.5|g+340.6|g), with the result then scaled up so that
155GD4cG the summed |g intensity for the two placements equals 90, the value
155GD5cG (92.3 {I8}) given by 1976Me10 for their 367.36 |g, after removal of
155GD6cG the contribution (2.0) of a 367.9 |g seen in (n,|g) but not reported
155GD7cG by 1976Me10 (see comment on the 367.9 |g from the 454.4 level). Note
155GD8cG that the split reported by these authors (|?57) agrees well with that
155GD9cG given here, but they associate it with the other placement (from the
155GDxcG 367.3 level) of this |g.
155GD cG MR 1996KrZZ report |d=-0.03 {I5}. 1976Me10 report |d|?0.04.
155GD G 427.18 1 1.09 3E1 0.00676
155GDS G KC=0.00576 8$LC=0.000783 11$MC=0.0001689 24
155GDS G NC=3.87E-5 6$OC=5.92E-6 9$PC=3.76E-7 6
155GD L 450.609 7 3/2- H
155GD E 0.054 7 8.91 7
155GDS E CK=0.8068 12$CL=0.1487 9$CM+=0.0444 4
155GD G 129.3 1 0.020 4 @ ?
155GD cG RI calculated using I|g(129.3|g)/I|g(450.5|g) from the Adopted
155GD2cG Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(450.6|g). 1976Me10 report I|g=0.25
155GD3cG {I15} for this |g and suggest two possible placements for it. One of
155GD4cG these is from this level and the other is out of a 721.06 level.
155GD5cG However, a 721.06 level now is not believed to be populated in the
155GDxcG {+155}Tb decay.
155GD G 304.6 5 0.020 3
155GD cG Shown as unplaced by 1976Me10 and having I|g|<0.05. However,
155GD2cG in (n,|g) a 304.53 |g with I|g=0.020 {I3} (on this intensity scale) is
155GD3cG is found to deexcite this level.
155GD cG RI calculated using I|g(304.5|g)/I|g(450.5|g) from the Adopted
155GD2cG Levels, Gammas data set and I|g(450.6|g).
155GD G 364.06 10.46 8
155GD G 390.62 1 0.75 15M1 0.0477
155GDS G KC=0.0405 6$LC=0.00567 8$MC=0.001229 18
155GDS G NC=0.000283 4$OC=4.40E-5 7$PC=2.98E-6 5
155GD G 450.64 2 1.12 9M1(+E2) 0.0257 73
155GDS G KC=0.0214 66$LC=0.0033 6$MC=0.00073 12
155GDS G NC=0.00017 3$OC=2.6E-5 5$PC=1.52E-6 54
155GD L 451.572 9 1/2- H
155GD E 0.020 3 9.34 7
155GDS E CK=0.8067 13$CL=0.1488 9$CM+=0.0444 4
155GD G 346.036 250.26 4E1 0.01118
155GDS G KC=0.00952 14$LC=0.001308 19$MC=0.000282 4
155GDS G NC=6.45E-5 9$OC=9.84E-6 14$PC=6.13E-7 9
155GD cG Reported by 1976Me10 to deexcite a 346.06 level.
155GD cG M from the adopted values. 1976Me10 report mult=(E2).
155GD G 391.60 1 0.12 5E2 0.0273
155GD cG M 1976Me10 indicate the possibility of an E0 component
155GD G 451.60 2 0.39 9M1,E2 0.0256 73
155GDS G KC=0.0213 66$LC=0.0033 6$MC=0.00073 12
155GDS G NC=0.00017 3$OC=2.5E-5 5$PC=1.51E-6 54
155GD cG CC computed assuming |d=1
155GD L 454.459 4 5/2- W
155GD E 0.104 9 8.61 5
155GDS E CK=0.8064 13$CL=0.1491 10$CM+=0.0445 4
155GD G 336.56 1 1.3 1E1 0.01197
155GDS G KC=0.01019 15$LC=0.001402 20$MC=0.000303 5
155GDS G NC=6.92E-5 10$OC=1.054E-5 15$PC=6.54E-7 10
155GD cG Shown unplaced by 1976Me10
155GD cG M from 1986Sc25,(n,|g). From |a(K)exp=0.023 {I5}, 1976Me10 give
155GD2cG mult=E1+M2 or E2?.
155GD G 367.929 12.0 2
155GD cG E from 1986Sc25, (n,|g)
155GD cG RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(454.45|g) and the |g
155GD2cG branching out of this level, as reported by 1986Sc25. Note that this
155GD3cG is only |?2% of the intensity of the 367.35 peak, as reported by
155GD4cG 1976Me10, and was not separately indicated by them.
155GD G 394.6 50.08 5
155GD G 454.45 1 0.79 8M1 0.0323
155GDS G KC=0.0274 4$LC=0.00382 6$MC=0.000827 12
155GDS G NC=0.000190 3$OC=2.96E-5 5$PC=2.01E-6 3
155GD L 488.678 6 5/2+ G
155GD E 0.93 7 7.57 5
155GDS E CK=0.8018 16$CL=0.1525 12$CM+=0.0457 4
155GD G 61.49 4 1.14 15M1+E2 0.42 AP 9.41 AP
155GDS G KC AP 6.33$LC AP 2.39$MC AP 0.549
155GDS G NC AP 0.1236$OC AP 0.01704$PC AP 0.000467
155GD G 138.29 7 0.96 9(M1) 0.800 ?
155GDS G KC=0.676 10$LC=0.0972 14$MC=0.0211 3
155GDS G NC=0.00486 7$OC=0.000754 11$PC=5.04E-5 7
155GD G 162.65 2 0.7 AP[M1,E2] 0.48 3 1 AP
155GDS G K/T=0.24 4$L/T=0.062 20$M/T=0.0142 51
155GDS G N/T=0.0032 12$O/T=4.5E-4 14$P/T=1.62E-5 55
155GDS G KC=0.36 7$LC=0.092 31$MC=0.0209 76
155GDS G NC=0.0047 17$OC=6.7E-4 20$PC=2.39E-5 81
155GD cG E from 1980Ab20
155GD cG RI photons not observed by 1976Me10, who report I(|g+ce)|?1.
155GD2cG Listed value computed by the evaluator from I(|g+ce) and the listed |a
155GDxcG value.
155GD G 201.0 100.5 3
155GD G 220.07 5 6.63 19M1,E2 0.19 3
155GDS G KC=0.15 4$LC=0.031 5$MC=0.0070 13
155GDS G NC=0.0016 3$OC=0.000231 25$PC=1.03E-5 36
155GD cG M from 1986Sc25, (n,|g). 1976Me10 report mult=(E1)
155GD G 222.0 10.8 4
155GD G 342.58 50.31 8
155GD G 370.73 1 9.07 25M1+E2 -0.25 +14-180.0534 24
155GDS G KC=0.0452 22$LC=0.00643 15$MC=0.00140 3
155GDS G NC=0.000321 7$OC=4.98E-5 14$PC=3.31E-6 18
155GD cG RI |g shown doubly placed by 1976Me10. From the |g branching out
155GD2cG of this level as observed in (n,|g) (1986Sc25), however, one computes
155GD3cG I|g=9.02 for this |g. The evaluator has thus concluded that all the
155GD4cG intensity (9.07) reported by 1976Me10 for this |g is associated with
155GD5cG the deexcitation of this level.
155GD cG MR from 1996KrZZ. 1976Me10 report |d<0.33.
155GD G 381.06 30.21 2
155GD G 383.35 1 1.03 15M1 0.0501
155GDS G KC=0.0425 6$LC=0.00596 9$MC=0.001291 18
155GDS G NC=0.000297 5$OC=4.62E-5 7$PC=3.13E-6 5
155GD G 402.16 1 2.87 18M1 0.0443
155GDS G KC=0.0376 6$LC=0.00525 8$MC=0.001138 16
155GDS G NC=0.000262 4$OC=4.07E-5 6$PC=2.76E-6 4
155GD cG M 1976Me10 indicate the possibility of an E0 component
155GD G 428.7 10.04 2
155GD G 488.65 150.68 12E1 0.00496
155GDS G KC=0.00423 6$LC=0.000572 8$MC=0.0001232 18
155GDS G NC=2.82E-5 4$OC=4.33E-6 6$PC=2.78E-7 4
155GD L 559.319 10 1/2- J
155GD E 0.139 11 8.15 6
155GDS E CK=0.787 3$CL=0.1631 22$CM+=0.0494 8
155GD G 132.0 1 0.3 1 ?
155GD G 237.5 4 0.11 8 ?
155GD G 290.2 1 0.08 3 & ?
155GD G 499.24 60.037 6
155GD G 559.32 1 5.4 3M1(+E2) 0.50 LE 0.0182 9
155GDS G KC=0.0154 8$LC=0.00216 9$MC=0.000468 18
155GDS G NC=0.000108 4$OC=1.67E-5 7$PC=1.12E-6 7
155GD L 592.060 7 3/2- K
155GD E 0.183 15 7.89 6
155GDS E CK=0.777 4$CL=0.171 3$CM+=0.0522 11
155GD G 141.5 1 0.16 8(M1) 0.750
155GDS G KC=0.634 9$LC=0.0911 13$MC=0.0198 3
155GDS G NC=0.00456 7$OC=0.000707 10$PC=4.72E-5 7
155GD G 271.0 50.08 5 ?
155GD G 305.11 100.12 5(M1) 0.0914
155GDS G KC=0.0774 11$LC=0.01093 16$MC=0.00237 4
155GDS G NC=0.000546 8$OC=8.48E-5 12$PC=5.72E-6 8
155GD G 323.53 80.9 3
155GD G 325.44 90.18 5
155GD G 445.98 10.39 9
155GD G 486.88 150.96 8E1 0.00500
155GDS G KC=0.00427 6$LC=0.000577 8$MC=0.0001242 18
155GDS G NC=2.85E-5 4$OC=4.37E-6 7$PC=2.81E-7 4
155GD G 505.52 1 1.81 11E1+M2 0.14 AP 0.00602AP
155GDS G KC AP 0.00510$LC AP 0.000719$MC AP 0.0001559
155GDS G NC AP 3.58E-5$OC AP 5.50E-6$PC AP 3.55E-7
155GD G 532.09 5 1.81 25E2 0.01186
155GDS G KC=0.00970 14$LC=0.001693 24$MC=0.000375 6
155GDS G NC=8.54E-5 12$OC=1.269E-5 18$PC=6.54E-7 10
155GD G 592.08 1 0.78 8E0+E2,M1 0.0128 38
155GDS G KC=0.0107 33$LC=0.0016 4$MC=0.00035 8
155GDS G NC=8.0E-5 17$OC=1.2E-5 3$PC=7.7E-7 26
155GD cG CC weighted average of 0.174 {I19} (1976Me10) and 0.190 {I30}
155GDxcG (1986AbZW)
155GD L 614.791 8 3/2- J
155GD E 0.051 4 8.33 7
155GDS E CK=0.767 6$CL=0.178 4$CM+=0.0548 15
155GD G 509.7 20.010 4
155GD G 554.78 1 0.79 9M1(+E2) 0.50 LE 0.0186 10
155GDS G KC=0.0157 8$LC=0.00221 9$MC=0.000478 18
155GDS G NC=0.000110 5$OC=1.71E-5 7$PC=1.15E-6 7
155GD G 614.80 1 1.21 8E2(+M1) 1.53 GT 0.0093 11
155GDS G KC=0.0077 9$LC=0.00122 10$MC=0.000268 21
155GDS G NC=6.1E-5 5$OC=9.3E-6 8$PC=5.3E-7 7
155GD L 647.770 5 5/2- K
155GD E 0.054 5 8.11 8
155GDS E CK=0.746 9$CL=0.194 7$CM+=0.0604 24
155GD G 193.319 4 0.038 7M1,E2 0.28 4
155GDS G KC=0.22 5$LC=0.049 11$MC=0.0110 28
155GDS G NC=0.0025 6$OC=0.00036 7$PC=1.48E-5 50
155GD cG 1976Me10 report Ice(K)|?0.11
155GD cG E,M from 1986Sc25, (n,|g)
155GD cG RI computed by the evaluator from I|g(501.7|g+529.7|g) and the
155GD2cG |g branching out of this level as reported by 1986Sc25. This |g is
155GD3cG shown unplaced by 1976Me10.
155GD G 379.14 30.28 8
155GD G 501.70 7 0.46 3M1+E2 1.0 LE 0.022 3
155GDS G KC=0.019 3$LC=0.00272 24$MC=0.00059 5
155GDS G NC=0.000136 12$OC=2.10E-5 20$PC=1.36E-6 21
155GD G 529.76 6 0.47 8E1 0.00414
155GDS G KC=0.00354 5$LC=0.000476 7$MC=0.0001024 15
155GDS G NC=2.35E-5 4$OC=3.61E-6 5$PC=2.33E-7 4
155GD G 542.45 30.16 8
155GD G 587.69 4 0.16 3E0+E2,M1 0.0130 38
155GDS G KC=0.0109 34$LC=0.0016 4$MC=0.00035 8
155GDS G NC=8.1E-5 18$OC=1.2E-5 3$PC=7.8E-7 27
155GD cG CC weighted average of 0.24 {I5} (1976Me10) and 0.205 {I40}
155GDxcG (1986AbZW)
155GD G 647.73 1 0.56 5E2+M1 2.0 GT 0.0079 6
155GDS G KC=0.0065 6$LC=0.00103 6$MC=0.000227 13
155GDS G NC=5.2E-5 3$OC=7.8E-6 5$PC=4.5E-7 5
155GD L 658.96 5 5/2- J
155GD E 0.0039 4 9.17 9
155GDS E CK=0.736 11$CL=0.201 8$CM+=0.063 3
155GD G 512.89 90.051 8
155GD G 598.96 60.093 11
155GD G 658.93 150.012 3