155DY    155DY IT DECAY (6 US)                                   19NDS    201911
155DY  H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 160, 1 (2019)$CUT=21-Oct-2019$
155DY c  1970Bo02: the source was produced in the {+155}Gd({+3}He,3n|g)
155DY2c  reaction, using a pulsed beam. Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, delayed |g,
155DY3c  delayed ce. The activity was assigned to {+155}Dy by comparison of the
155DY2c  measured E|g with known values reported in the {+155}Ho |e decay.
155DY c  Although 1970Bo02 correctly associated the isomeric state with the
155DY2c  11/2[505] Nilsson orbital, they did not propose a decay scheme for
155DY3c  it. The decay scheme shown here is that worked up by the evaluator
155DY4c  and relies heavily on the level-scheme information obtained from the
155DY5c  {+155}Ho |e decay.
155DY cG           The |g-ray properties are those as given in the
155DY2cG {+155}Ho |e decay data set.
155DY tG
155DY tG $    Relative |g-ray intensities from decay of 6-|ms {+155}Dy (1970Bo02
155DY tG $   --------------------------------------------------------------
155DY tG $       E|g(keV)       I|g               E|g(keV)       I|g
155DY tG $       -------     -------            -------     -------
155DY tG $        37        9     5              88         2.4 {I12}
155DY tG $        47|*      37    20             103         9   2
155DY tG $        68        1.4  {I10}             139        21   3
155DY tG $        79        9.5  {I20}             147        16   2
155DY tG $   -------------
155DY tG $  |*I|g value includes a contribution from K x rays
155DY tG
155DY cG RI        The relative I|g values for the |g's deexciting a given level
155DY2cG are those observed in the {+155}Ho |e decay. The I|g values of the |g's
155DY3cG deexciting a given level, relative to those deexciting other levels,
155DY4cG have been adjusted to provide a suitable intensity balance at each
155DY5cG level.
155DY cG RI        The |g intensity scale has been chosen so that the sum of the
155DY2cG I(|g+ce) values of the transitions deexciting the 6-|ms isomer is
155DY3cG 100%. Note that these values depend significantly on the I(|g+ce)
155DY4cG value of the 9.1 |g. This value, relative to those of the other
155DY5cG transitions deexciting the isomer, was chosen to reproduce the
155DY6cG relative I|g values of the 138 and the 147 (and 79) |g's. It is much
155DY7cG smaller than what would be expected from the ce data of 1979Al31 and
155DY8cG 1979Ab18 on the |e decay of {+155}Ho. See the discussion under the 9.1
155DY9cG |g in the {+155}Ho |e decay data set.
155DY cL E,J       From adopted values
155DY cL T         From adopted values, unless noted otherwise
155DY DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
155DY  P 234.33     311/2-               6 US    1
155DY  N    1.0                1.0
155DY PN    1.0                                                              3
155DY  L 0.0         3/2-                 9.9 H  2
155DY  L 39.384     95/2-              3.34 NS   3
155DY  G 39.39     2   5.5   3 M1+E2     0.222   4     11.9   3
155DYS G  LC=9.26 21$MC=2.13 5
155DYS G  NC=0.484 12$OC=0.0629 14$PC=0.00183 3
155DY  L 86.767    127/2-              1.1 NS    2
155DY  G 47.37     2  13.4   15M1+E2     0.115   10    4.03   14
155DYS G  LC=3.14 11$MC=0.702 25
155DYS G  NC=0.161 6$OC=0.0227 7$PC=0.001093 16
155DY  G 86.75     2   4.6   2 E2                      4.63
155DYS G  KC=1.567 22$LC=2.36 4$MC=0.566 8
155DYS G  NC=0.1269 18$OC=0.01515 22$PC=6.50E-5 10
155DY  L 132.195   229/2+                 51 NS  3
155DY  G 45.38     5  44     32E1                      0.467
155DYS G  LC=0.366 6$MC=0.0806 12
155DYS G  NC=0.0180 3$OC=0.00230 4$PC=8.14E-5 12
155DY  L 154.48     5  13/2+
155DY  G 22.15     5  0.0075 14[E2]                    2.39E3 5
155DYS G  LC=1.84E3 4$MC=437 8
155DYS G  NC=97.2 18$OC=11.32 21$PC=0.00350 7
155DY  L 225.285   16 9/2-
155DY  G 138.46    4  10.6   11E2(+M1)   2.4     GT    0.843  15
155DYS G  KC=0.49 3$LC=0.272 13$MC=0.064 4
155DYS G  NC=0.0145 8$OC=0.00179 8$PC=2.26E-5 22
155DY  G 185.89    2   4.1   3 E2                      0.302
155DYS G  KC=0.197 3$LC=0.0810 12$MC=0.0190 3
155DYS G  NC=0.00430 6$OC=0.000540 8$PC=9.25E-6 13
155DY  L 234.33     311/2-               6 US    1                           M
155DY cL T         from 1970Bo02, |g(t)
155DY2 L %IT=100
155DY  G 9.1        1  0.047 5 M1+E2     0.0189  21     530   AP
155DY  G 79.72     5   4.3   4 E1+M2     0.23    3     3.3    7
155DYS G  KC=2.4 5$LC=0.66 16$MC=0.16 4
155DYS G  NC=0.036 9$OC=0.0051 12$PC=0.00024 6
155DY  G 102.16    3   9.1   11E1+M2     0.45    6     3.8    8
155DYS G  KC=2.8 6$LC=0.74 16$MC=0.17 4
155DYS G  NC=0.040 9$OC=0.0057 13$PC=0.00028 6
155DY DG RI        RELATIVE TO THE RI VALUES OF THE OTHER G RAYS OBSERVED TO
155DY2DG  DEEXCITE THIS LEVEL, RI(102.16G) AS REPORTED BY 1979Ab18 IS A FACTOR
155DY3DG  OF ROUGHLY 2 LARGER THAN THAT REPORTED BY 1970Bo02 (^see THE TABLE
155DY4DG  ABOVE). WHILE THIS MIGHT BE CONSIDERED AS EVIDENCE THAT THE 102 G
155DY5DG  IN THE WORK OF 1979Ab18 IS A DOUBLET, WE HAVE CHOSEN TO ASSUME THAT TH
155DY6DG  FULL STRENGTH OF THIS G AS REPORTED BY 1979Ab18 IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
155DY7DG  DECAY OF THE 234.33 LEVEL.
155DY  G 147.63    6   7.5   11[E2]                    0.666
155DYS G  KC=0.388 6$LC=0.215 3$MC=0.0509 8
155DYS G  NC=0.01146 17$OC=0.001412 20$PC=1.721E-5 25