155TB 155DY EC DECAY 1980AB17 19NDS 201911
155TB H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 160, 1 (2019)$CUT=21-Oct-2019$
155TB D DATA SET UPDATED (AUGUST, 2003) BY CW REICH TO INCLUDE MANY NEW,
155TB2D ALBEIT UNPLACED, GAMMAS, MENTION OF SEVERAL NEW PROPOSED, BUT NOT
155TB3D ADOPTED LEVELS, AND REVISED MR VALUES FOR SEVERAL GAMMAS.
155TB c The decay scheme presented here is based largely on the data of
155TB2c 1980Ab17. This same information is also given in 1980AbZZ. Other
155TB3c references: 1977Al30, 1973Ba06, 1972Ha41, 1969Ju02, 1967Bl12, 1963Pe13.
155TB c 1980Ab17: {+155}Dy source material obtained through chemical and
155TB2c isotopic separation of reaction products from 660-MeV proton
155TB3c spallation on a Ta target. Measured E|g, I|g using a Ge(Li) detector.
155TB4c Measured E(ce), Ice using constant uniform-field |b spectrographs,
155TB5c with the electrons being recorded in photographic plates. A Si(Li)
155TB6c detector was also used to detect conversion electrons.
155TB c 1980Bu04: measure |b{++} spectra of chemically and isotopically
155TB2c purified {+155}Dy sources, using an iron-free |b-ray spectrometer
155TB3c having a toroidal magnetic field. Maximum transmission was |?20%, and
155TB4c the resolution was |?1.1%.
155TB c 1996AdZW measure the |g spectra from the {+155}Dy decay using a variety
155TB2c of Ge detectors. Source material was produced via 660-MeV proton
155TB3c bombardment of a target, followed by chemical and isotope separation.
155TB4c A number of previously unreported weak |g's were observed, but not
155TB5c placed in the decay scheme.
155TB c 1984ShZN and 1996KrZY use low-temperature nuclear orientation of
155TB2c chemically and isotopically separated {+155}Dy samples embedded in a
155TB3c Gd matrix to deduce mixing ratios for a number of the {+155}Tb |g rays.
155TB c 1998AdZX measure |g|g coincidences using HPGe detectors. These authors
155TB2c report the following new levels (with J|p values in parentheses):
155TB3c 614 (3/2+,5/2,7/2-); 726 (5/2+,7/2,9/2-); 937; 940 (5/2+,7/2,9/2-);
155TB4c 1086; 1316; 1709; 1722; and 1773. They list several |g's connecting
155TB5c these levels as well as previously reported levels. These levels and
155TB6c |g's are given to only the nearest keV; and no multipolarities are
155TB7c given. Association of some of these |g's and some of the listed levels
155TB8c with previously established levels is problematic. Other than this
155TB9c comment, the evaluator has not included this information in this
155TBKc data set.
155TB cG The Ice values of 1980Ab17 are reported to have uncertainties
155TB2cG |<20%. These uncertainties are generally not listed explicitly in
155TB3cG this evaluation but they have been taken into account in the
155TB3cG calculation of the I|g, |d and |a values that are based on these
155TB4cG ce data.
155TB cG E$From 1980Ab17
155TB cG RI Listed values are those of 1980Ab17, normalized to
155TB2cG I|g(226.9|g)=100, unless noted otherwise.
155TB cG E(Z) E|g and I|g are from 1996AdZW.
155TB cG RI I(Tb K x rays)=179, relative to I|g(226.9|g)=100 (1967Bl12)
155TB cG M Unless noted otherwise, the listed values are those deduced
155TB2cG by 1980Ab17 from comparison of measured conversion coefficients and
155TB3cG L-subshell ratios with theoretical values. The normalization of the
155TB4cG I|g and Ice data was done by requiring that |a(K)exp=0.0287 (the
155TB5cG theoretical value for E1) for the 226.9 |g. Mult=E1 for this |g is
155TB6cG established by the measured L-subshell ratios (see, for example,
155TBxcG 1980Ab17).
155TB cG M(Q)$The |a(K)exp values deduced by 1980Ab17 for a number of the
155TB2cG |g transitions seem disturbingly large. They lead to rather large M2/E1
155TB3cG mixing ratios for some low-energy (below|?800 keV) transitions for
155TB4cG which |D|p=yes and, in some instances, imply pure M2 transitions which
155TB5cG compete favorably with higher-energy transitions of lower
155TB6cG multipole order. The reason for these large |a(K)exp values, if they
155TB6cG are indeed incorrect, is not clear; they appear in many instances to be
155TB7cG associated with small values of Ice(K). The existence of large values
155TB8cG of |a(K)exp has also been used by 1980Ab17 to infer the presence of E0
155TB9cG components in transitions for which |D|p=no. In some instances, the
155TBKcG interpretation of M2 rather than E0 in a transition seems to have
155TBScG been based largely on whether or not a parity change was involved.
155TBNcG Thus, these admixtures, and the deduced mults, are determined from
155TBJcG considerations other that of |a(K)exp alone. The evaluator has used the
155TBFcG mults and |d values from these |a(K)exp data, but has generally avoided
155TBLcG using them in adopting J|p values for the associated levels.
155TB cG MR Unless otherwise indicated, the listed values are those
155TB2cG calculated by the evaluator from the L-subshell ratios reported by
155TB3cG 1980Ab17.
155TB cG MR In the low-temperature nuclear orientation studies of
155TB2cG 1984ShZN and 1996KrZY, some |d values are shown with minus signs and
155TB3cG some without a sign. The evaluator has assumed that these latter
155TB4cG should be positive and has listed them, where an |d value is
155TB5cG adopted, with a positive sign.
155TB cG E(J) |g shown as questionably placed by 1980Ab17. Several problems
155TB2cG are presented by this transition. 1980Ab17 report Ice(K)=0.0016, which
155TB3cG gives mult=E1, inconsistent with the indicated placement in the decay
155TB4cG scheme. 1972Ha41, however, state that this transition is E2, based on
155TB5cG their measured L-subshell ratios (these data are not shown in their
155TB6cG paper); however, mult=E2, together with the adopted I|g, would lead to
155TB7cG Ice(K)=0.0062. 1971Wi24 report a |g transition deexciting to the g.s.
155TB8cG from this level, although it is weaker, relative to the 269.3 |g, by a
155TB9cG factor of |?4 than the I|g value of the 334.9 |g given by 1980Ab17 (the
155TBKcG one listed here). The energy fit is also not particularly good. No
155TBKcG resolution of these difficulties is apparent at this time. It may be
155TBScG that the 334.963 peak reported by 1980Ab17 is complex, with only a
155TBNcG small portion of it being the g.s. transition, but this is merely
155TBJcG speculation at this time.
155TB cL E$Computed from a least-squares fit to the listed E|g values. |h{+2}
155TB2cL norm = 9.3 greater than |h{+2} critical = 1.3
155TB cL J From adopted values
155TB CL BAND(A)$Member of the 3/2[411] band
155TB CL BAND(B)$Member of the 5/2(532) band. This band is strongly Coriolis
155TB2cL mixed with other h11/2-related Nilsson orbitals.
155TB CL BAND(C)$Member of the 5/2[413] band
155TB CL BAND(D)$Bandhead of 5/2[402]
155TB CL BAND(N)$Probable 7/2[404] bandhead
155TB DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
155DY P 0.0 3/2- 9.9 H 2 2094.5 19
155TB N 0.687 10 1.0 1.0
155TB PN 4
155TB cN NR Computed by requiring that the total intensity of all
155TB2cN radiations feeding the g.s. be 100%. The |e+|b{++} intensity to the
155TB3cN g.s. was obtained using I|b{++}(g.s.)/I(|g+ce)(226.9|g)=0.00091 {I25}.
155TB4cN This value is a weighted average of the values
155TB5cN I|b{++}(g.s.)/I(|g+ce)(226.9|g)=0.0013 {I3} (1963Pe13) and
155TB5cN I|b{++}(g.s.)/I(|g+ce)(226.9|g)=0.00075 {I19} resulting from
155TB6cN I|b{++}(g.s.)/Ice(K)(226.9|g)=0.027 {I7} (1980Bu04). Note that, with
155TB7cN many (albeit weak) unplaced |g transitions, the g.s. feeding used in
155TBxcN the I|g normalization calculation may be too small.
155TB G 23.96 5
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(L1)=0.070, relative to
155TB2cG Ice(K)=2.870 for the strong 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 68.855 230.018 8
155TB2 G %IG=0.012 5$
155TB G 121.083 12
155TB2 G %IG=0.012 5$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.010, relative to Ice(K)=2.870
155TB2cG for the strong 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 135.454 13
155TB2 G %IG=0.012 5$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.010, relative to Ice(K)=2.870
155TB2cG for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 248.645 220.157 7E1 0.0267
155TB2 G %IG=0.108 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0226 4$LC=0.00319 5$MC=0.000694 10
155TBS G NC=0.0001590 23$OC=2.38E-5 4$PC=1.405E-6 20
155TB G 254.23 14 0.0122 28 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0084 19$
155TB G 276.81 50.056 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.038 14$
155TB G 296.37 10 0.0122 18 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0084 12$
155TB G 299.09 15 0.0061 18 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0042 12$
155TB G 301.49 9 0.0097 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0067 11$
155TB G 308.95 16 0.0052 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0036 11$
155TB G 377.72 50.072 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0495 28$
155TB G 379.3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0495 28$
155TB G 411.45 3 0.0326 19 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0224 13$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.0014, relative to
155TB2cG Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 421.85 5 0.063 5M1 0.0424
155TB2 G %IG=0.0433 35$
155TBS G KC=0.0360 5$LC=0.00507 8$MC=0.001105 16
155TBS G NC=0.000255 4$OC=3.95E-5 6$PC=2.64E-6 4
155TB cG Ice(K)=0.0018, relative to Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1
155TB2cG transition
155TB G 441.44 70.058 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0398 35$
155TB G 463.0
155TB2 G %IG=0.0398 35$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.0011 {I2}, relative to
155TB2cG Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 471.44 12 0.0097 15 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0067 10$
155TB G 473.03 7 0.0150 15 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0103 10$
155TB G 477.86 10 0.0117 17 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0080 12$
155TB G 479.58 12 0.0140 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0096 17$
155TB G 522.14 18 0.0079 19 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0054 13$
155TB G 533.12 140.031 5(E1+M2) 0.0049 7 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.0213 34$
155TBS G KC=0.0042 6$LC=0.00058 9$MC=0.000127 21
155TBS G NC=2.9E-5 5$OC=4.5E-6 8$PC=2.8E-7 5
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.045
155TB G 534.0 30.030 15
155TB2 G %IG=0.021 10$
155TB G 535.55 13 0.0107 14 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0074 10$
155TB G 540.39 13 0.0084 13 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0058 9$
155TB G 542.24 30.086 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.059 6$
155TB G 559.44 80.047 7 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.032 5$
155TB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.0524, 1980Ab17 give mult=M2
155TB G 564.4 3 0.006 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0041 21$
155TB G 590.60 18 0.0131 21 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0090 14$
155TB G 599.14 220.034 8 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.023 6$
155TB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.0265, 1980Ab17 quote mult=M2+E1
155TB G 605.42 8 0.0260 20 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0179 14$
155TB G 614.83 130.043 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.030 4$
155TB G 620.27 10 0.0432 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0297 18$
155TB G 623.57 6 0.0260 23 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0179 16$
155TB G 628.55 13 0.0083 17 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0057 12$
155TB G 642.89 10 0.048 5 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0330 35$
155TB G 656.69 6 0.191 14E1 0.00273
155TB2 G %IG=0.131 10$
155TBS G KC=0.00233 4$LC=0.000313 5$MC=6.77E-5 10
155TBS G NC=1.559E-5 22$OC=2.38E-6 4$PC=1.543E-7 22
155TB G 661.62 220.080 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.055 12$
155TB G 666.4 40.080 25
155TB2 G %IG=0.055 17$
155TB G 669.02 200.095 28
155TB2 G %IG=0.065 19$
155TB G 676.39 120.058 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.040 4$
155TB G 682.76 11 0.0114 17 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0078 12$
155TB G 692.28 22 0.012 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0082 21$
155TB G 698.76 5 0.040 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0275 28$
155TB G 701.15 90.083 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.057 6$
155TB G 712.49 70.067 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.046 4$
155TB G 721.19 4 0.415 13M1+E2 0.0084 26
155TB2 G %IG=0.285 10$
155TBS G KC=0.0071 22$LC=0.0010 3$MC=0.00023 6
155TBS G NC=5.2E-5 13$OC=8.0E-6 21$PC=5.1E-7 17
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.0058
155TB G 729.44 17 0.017 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0117 21$
155TB G 731.80 21 0.013 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0089 21$
155TB G 739.12 120.014 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0096 28$
155TB G 751.28 12 0.072 8 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.049 6$
155TB G 755.45 12 0.016 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0110 21$
155TB G 758.99 200.069 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.047 8$
155TB G 765.4 0.054 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.0371 5$
155TB cG RI I|g(765.4|g+767.6|g)=0.047 {I7} (1980Ab17)
155TB G 766.613 23 0.060 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0412 28$
155TB G 771.52 11 0.0294 21 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0202 15$
155TB G 778.23 12 0.018 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0124 21$
155TB G 782.19 4 0.152 10M1+E2 0.0069 21
155TB2 G %IG=0.104 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0059 18$LC=0.00084 21$MC=0.00018 5
155TBS G NC=4.3E-5 11$OC=6.5E-6 17$PC=4.2E-7 14
155TB G 784.61 6 0.123 7M1+E2 0.0069 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.085 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0058 18$LC=0.00084 21$MC=0.00018 5
155TBS G NC=4.2E-5 11$OC=6.5E-6 17$PC=4.1E-7 14
155TB G 789.89 14 0.012 5 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0082 34$
155TB G 808.28 120.137 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.094 12$
155TB G 809.79 5 0.0694 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0477 13$
155TB G 816.41 21 0.020 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0137 21$
155TB G 819.44 15 0.0154 23 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0106 16$
155TB G 843.39 10 0.0391 22 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0269 16$
155TB G 854.78 80.074 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.051 4$
155TB G 864.73 10 0.0196 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0135 17$
155TB G 868.01 10 0.0196 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0135 17$
155TB G 875.30 120.037 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0254 35$
155TB G 894.88 4 0.0339 15 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0233 11$
155TB G 915.76 15 0.039 6 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.027 4$
155TB G 925.4 40.020 7
155TB2 G %IG=0.014 5$
155TB G 938.19 4 0.173 6E1 1.34E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.119 4$
155TBS G KC=0.001150 16$LC=0.0001517 22$MC=3.28E-5 5
155TBS G NC=7.55E-6 11$OC=1.161E-6 17$PC=7.68E-8 11
155TB G 947.53 16 0.017 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0117 21$
155TB G 949.99 80.080 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.055 6$
155TB G 977.02 13 0.0209 22 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0144 15$
155TB G 978.93 3 0.059 5 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0405 35$
155TB G 984.79 9 0.020 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0137 21$
155TB G 986.54 22 0.0122 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0084 17$
155TB G 989.68 6 0.0277 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0190 17$
155TB G 994.18 140.083 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.057 8$
155TB G 1009.96 100.043 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0295 28$
155TB G 1021.5 3 0.0055 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0038 11$
155TB G 1025.77 20 0.0087 13 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0060 9$
155TB G 1030.14 9 0.0113 10 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0078 7$
155TB G 1032.23 6 0.0157 11 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0108 8$
155TB G 1035.79 7 0.0155 10 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0106 7$
155TB G 1044.97 15 0.0073 22 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0050 15$
155TB G 1055.3 4 0.0031 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0021 11$
155TB G 1066.32 8 0.082 5 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0563 35$
155TB G 1074.39 19 0.0040 15 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0027 10$
155TB G 1078.75 26 0.0028 10 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0019 7$
155TB G 1105.73 16 0.0158 23 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0109 16$
155TB G 1107.99 10 0.0350 23 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0240 16$
155TB G 1110.5 3 0.0069 21 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0047 14$
155TB G 1133.00 8 0.017 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0117 21$
155TB G 1136.78 5 0.0300 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0206 11$
155TB G 1143.44 80.079 7
155TB2 G %IG=0.054 5$
155TB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.00109 {I19}, 1980Ab17 report mult=E1+M2
155TB G 1150.40 19 0.0128 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0088 17$
155TB G 1172.48 3 0.082 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0563 29$
155TB G 1172.59 120.072 12
155TB2 G %IG=0.049 8$
155TB G 1187.42 8 0.0140 12 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0096 8$
155TB G 1190.98 7 0.0157 22 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0108 15$
155TB G 1205.29 5 0.0283 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0194 11$
155TB G 1209.26 5 0.031 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0213 21$
155TB G 1214.32 8 0.029 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0199 21$
155TB G 1216.88 17 0.0118 21 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0081 14$
155TB G 1224.84 7 0.0095 7 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0065 5$
155TB G 1229.03 4 0.0172 10 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0118 7$
155TB G 1256.99 12 0.0168 19 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0115 13$
155TB G 1274.07 6 0.0117 7 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0080 5$
155TB G 1278.19 12 0.0049 7 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0034 5$
155TB G 1285.79 12 0.0115 10 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0079 7$
155TB G 1289.08 250.014 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.010 6$
155TB G 1305.4 4 0.016 8 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.011 5$
155TB G 1370.40 6 0.030 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0206 21$
155TB G 1381.3 3 0.0040 13 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0027 9$
155TB G 1399.94 19 0.0064 11 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0044 8$
155TB G 1402.0 40.016 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0110 28$
155TB G 1404.5 30.020 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0137 28$
155TB G 1417.85 13 0.0077 8 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0053 6$
155TB G 1441.96 10 0.0135 19 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0093 13$
155TB G 1446.84 7 0.0120 9 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0082 6$
155TB G 1462.40 6 0.0146 7 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0100 5$
155TB G 1472.9 3 0.012 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0082 28$
155TB G 1474.3 6 0.007 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0048 27$
155TB G 1483.07 5 0.0272 21 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0187 15$
155TB G 1485.92 12 0.0082 13 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0056 9$
155TB G 1498.95 5 0.0269 23 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0185 16$
155TB G 1518.37 8 0.0065 5 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00447 35$
155TB G 1524.1 11 0.0037 25 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0025 17$
155TB G 1531.39 11 0.0044 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00302 28$
155TB G 1557.8 40.009 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0062 21$
155TB G 1562.91 60.121 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.083 4$
155TB G 1577.99 12 0.0057 6 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0039 4$
155TB G 1606.4 30.911 2
155TB2 G %IG=0.626 9$
155TB G 1610.52 220.0054 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.0037 12$
155TB G 1615.11 11 0.0041 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00282 28$
155TB G 1619.14 5 0.0037 6 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0025 4$
155TB G 1626.22 11 0.0040 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00275 28$
155TB G 1630.17 18 0.0023 4 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00158 28$
155TB G 1647.82 170.0151 22
155TB2 G %IG=0.0104 15$
155TB G 1657.65 8 0.0187 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.01285 19$
155TB cG RI uncertainty is illegible in the reference.
155TB G 1678.1 50.010 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0069 27$
155TB G 1691.6 40.014 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.010 8$
155TB G 1745.60 120.0173 19
155TB2 G %IG=0.0119 13$
155TB G 1786.48 7 0.0046 2 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00316 14$
155TB G 1799.99 19 0.0022 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00151 21$
155TB G 1811.86 7 0.0030 2 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00206 14$
155TB G 1814.64 6 0.0032 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00220 21$
155TB G 1852.12 9 0.0028 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00192 21$
155TB G 1857.55 9 0.0182 16 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0125 11$
155TB G 1879.64 18 0.0014 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00096 21$
155TB G 1893.72 19 0.0222 18 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0153 13$
155TB G 1902.60 8 0.0018 2 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00124 14$
155TB G 1911.23 9 0.0018 3 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.00124 21$
155TB G 1951.59 25 0.0083 14 Z
155TB2 G %IG=0.0057 10$
155TB L 0.0 3/2+ 5.32 D 6 A
155TB E 0.065 17 1.4 4 8.00 12 1.5 4
155TBS E EAV=490.21 84$CK=0.8004 2$CL=0.12094 4$CM+=0.03540 1
155TB cE E 1980Bu04 report E|b+=1090 {I15}. 1963Pe13 report E|b+=1075
155TBxcE {I8}.
155TB L 65.4609 24 5/2+ 0.25 NS 3 A
155TB cL T from 1977Al30, |gce(t) and ce-ce(t)
155TB E 0.039 7 1.1 2 8.11 8 1.1 2
155TBS E EAV=461.39 84$CK=0.8070 2$CL=0.12211 4$CM+=0.03575 1
155TB cE E 1980Bu04 report E|b+=1030 {I5}
155TB cE IB from I|b{++}/Ice(K)(226.9|g)=0.019 {I3} (1980Bu04). The
155TB2cE I(|g+ce) balance at this level suggests no |e+|b{++} feeding. However,
155TB3cE one of the |g transitions (the 1090.0|g) feeding this level is part of
155TB4cE a doublet having I|g=4.01 {I10}. If a significant fraction of this I|g
155TB5cE value is associated with the other placement, then the resulting
155TB6cE I(|g+ce) balance at this level would allow some |e+|b{++} feeding.
155TB G 65.459 3 2.68 5M1+E2 0.144 5 7.58
155TB2 G %IG=1.84 4$
155TBS G KC=6.20 9$LC=1.072 19$MC=0.238 5
155TBS G NC=0.0546 10$OC=0.00816 14$PC=0.000464 7
155TB cG MR weighted average of 0.128 {I13} (1987BaZB,1987BaYQ) and
155TB2cG 0.147 {I5} (1971AkZT,1971AkZU). Other:
155TB3cG 0.087 {I2} (1980Ab17). (All of these values
155TB3cG are those as computed by the evaluator from the measured L-subshell
155TB4cG ratios.)
155TB L 155.783 3 7/2+ 0.2 NS LE A
155TB cL T from 1977Al30, |gce(t). These authors show that the value
155TB2cL T{-1/2}=1.16 ns {I7} reported for this level by 1970Va40 is in fact
155TB3cL associated with the 105.3 level in {+155}Gd.
155TB G 90.326 2 1.56 3M1+E2 0.140 4 2.96
155TB2 G %IG=1.072 26$
155TBS G KC=2.46 4$LC=0.390 6$MC=0.0859 13
155TBS G NC=0.0198 3$OC=0.00300 5$PC=0.000183 3
155TB cG MR average of 0.135 {I5} (1980Ab17) and 0.144 {I10}
155TB2cG (1987BaZB,1987BaYQ), both values being those calculated by the
155TB3cG evaluator from the respective L-subshell ratios.
155TB G 155.765 9 0.303 12E2 0.536
155TB2 G %IG=0.208 9$
155TBS G KC=0.331 5$LC=0.1585 23$MC=0.0372 6
155TBS G NC=0.00838 12$OC=0.001113 16$PC=1.780E-5 25
155TB L 226.916 3 5/2- 0.35 NS 3 B
155TB cL T weighted average of: 0.29 ns {I3} (1977Al30), |gce(t);
155TB2cL 0.306 ns {I22} (1970Va40), |gce(t); 0.44 ns {I3} (1967Ma33) |g|g(t);
155TB3cL 0.45 ns {I4} (1967Ko17), X|g(t); 0.32 ns {I5} (1967Ha12), X|g(t) and
155TB4cL |g|g(t); 0.32 ns {I5} (1966Be45) |g|g(t).
155TB E 1.28 4 65.3 17 6.244 15 66.6 17
155TBS E EAV=390.50 84$CK=0.8198 2$CL=0.12452 3$CM+=0.036475 8
155TB cE E 1980Bu04 report E|b+=845 {I2}. 1963Pe13 report E|b+=850 {I6}.
155TB cE IB I|b{++}/I(|g+ce)(226|g)=0.018 {I1} (1963Pe13). 1980Bu04
155TB2cE report I|b{++}/Ice(K)(226|g)=0.95 {I7} and I|b{++}=1.95% {I25}. Their
155TB3cE reported |e to |b{++} intensity ratio differs considerably from the
155TBxcE theoretical prediction.
155TB G 71.157 100.064 4E1 0.743
155TB2 G %IG=0.0440 28$
155TBS G KC=0.615 9$LC=0.0999 14$MC=0.0218 3
155TBS G NC=0.00493 7$OC=0.000697 10$PC=3.26E-5 5
155TB G 161.443 4 1.68 3E1 0.0830
155TB2 G %IG=1.154 27$
155TBS G KC=0.0700 10$LC=0.01019 15$MC=0.00222 4
155TBS G NC=0.000506 7$OC=7.48E-5 11$PC=4.15E-6 6
155TB G 226.918 4 100.0 18E1 0.0338
155TB2 G %IG=68.7 16$
155TBS G KC=0.0286 4$LC=0.00406 6$MC=0.000883 13
155TBS G NC=0.000202 3$OC=3.02E-5 5$PC=1.762E-6 25
155TB cG MR 1996KrZY report |d(M2/E1)=0.01 {I6}
155TB L 250.028 4 7/2- 0.56 NS 5 B
155TB cL T from 1977Al30, |gce(t)
155TB G 23.13 3 0.038 10M1+E2 0.118 5 49.3 22
155TB2 G %IG=0.026 7$
155TBS G LC=38.3 17$MC=8.7 4
155TBS G NC=1.97 9$OC=0.275 12$PC=0.00997 15
155TB G 184.564 4 4.93 9E1 0.0581
155TB2 G %IG=3.39 8$
155TBS G KC=0.0491 7$LC=0.00708 10$MC=0.001538 22
155TBS G NC=0.000352 5$OC=5.22E-5 8$PC=2.96E-6 5
155TB L 271.042 4 5/2+ C
155TB G 21.005 5 0.021 8[E1] 3.85
155TB2 G %IG=0.014 6$
155TBS G LC=3.01 5$MC=0.671 10
155TBS G NC=0.1468 21$OC=0.0179 3$PC=0.000547 8
155TB G 115.268 7 0.142 8M1+E2 0.19 1 1.466
155TB2 G %IG=0.098 6$
155TBS G KC=1.218 18$LC=0.194 4$MC=0.0428 7
155TBS G NC=0.00985 16$OC=0.001491 23$PC=9.00E-5 13
155TB G 205.583 9 0.521 20M1+E2 0.59 5 0.268 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.358 15$
155TBS G KC=0.218 5$LC=0.0390 8$MC=0.00870 18
155TBS G NC=0.00200 4$OC=0.000295 5$PC=1.56E-5 4
155TB G 271.056 9 1.77 10M1+E2 +0.55 3 0.1245 20
155TB2 G %IG=1.22 7$
155TBS G KC=0.1032 18$LC=0.01663 24$MC=0.00367 6
155TBS G NC=0.000845 12$OC=0.0001272 18$PC=7.44E-6 14
155TB cG MR weighted average of +0.46 {I10} (1996KrZY) and 0.56 {I3}
155TB2cG (1980Ab17).
155TB L 274.073 89/2+ A
155TB G 118.304 100.141 8M1 1.359
155TB2 G %IG=0.097 6$
155TBS G KC=1.146 16$LC=0.1666 24$MC=0.0364 5
155TBS G NC=0.00842 12$OC=0.001296 19$PC=8.53E-5 12
155TB G 208.583 140.036 3E2 0.199
155TB2 G %IG=0.0247 21$
155TBS G KC=0.1382 20$LC=0.0473 7$MC=0.01097 16
155TBS G NC=0.00248 4$OC=0.000337 5$PC=7.98E-6 12
155TB L 317.045 10 9/2- B
155TB E ?
155TBS E EAV=350.97 84
155TB cE $|eK=0.82480 {I9}; |eL=0.12558 {I2}; |eM+=0.036801 {I7}
155TB cE TI$0.33 {I4} from intensity balance is incompatible with
155TB2cE second-forbidden unique |DJ=3, |D|p=no transition, possibly due
155TB2cE to missing |g-ray intensity at this level
155TB G 42.964 18 0.12 2[E1] 0.525
155TB2 G %IG=0.082 14$
155TBS G LC=0.412 6$MC=0.0903 13
155TBS G NC=0.0202 3$OC=0.00273 4$PC=0.0001096 16
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Listed value was calculated from
155TB2cG Ice(L1)=0.024, assuming mult=E1
155TB G 67.029 100.058 4M1+E2 0.13 3 7.05 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.0398 28$
155TBS G KC=5.81 9$LC=0.97 6$MC=0.214 14
155TBS G NC=0.049 3$OC=0.0074 4$PC=0.000434 7
155TB G 161.3 0.107 7(E1) 0.0832
155TB2 G %IG=0.074 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0702 10$LC=0.01021 15$MC=0.00222 4
155TBS G NC=0.000507 8$OC=7.50E-5 11$PC=4.16E-6 6
155TB cG E from 1971Wi24. This transition was not reported by 1980Ab17,
155TB2cG probably being obscured by the strong 161.443 |g in their spectrum.
155TB cG RI computed by the evaluator from
155TB2cG I|g(161.3|g)/I|g(66.9|g)=1.85, as reported by 1971Wi24 in (|a,2n|g),
155TBxcG and I|g(67.029|g).
155TB L 334.824 9 7/2+ C
155TB G 63.781 150.026 5M1+E2 0.19 3 8.27 14
155TB2 G %IG=0.0179 34$
155TBS G KC=6.62 11$LC=1.29 10$MC=0.288 23
155TBS G NC=0.066 6$OC=0.0097 7$PC=0.000495 8
155TB cG RI calculated from measured Ice(K) using |d=0.19 {I3}.
155TB2cG Ice(K)=0.178, Ice(L1)=0.024, Ice(L2)=0.006, relative to Ice(K)=2.870
155TB3cG for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 84.83 4 0.032 8[E1] 0.466
155TB2 G %IG=0.022 6$
155TBS G KC=0.389 6$LC=0.0610 9$MC=0.01330 19
155TBS G NC=0.00301 5$OC=0.000432 6$PC=2.11E-5 3
155TB cG M from |a(K)exp=1.2 {I4} for this |g. Since it is a |D|p=yes
155TB2cG transition, this leads to mult=E1+M2, with |d=0.17 {I+4-5}. Such a
155TB3cG large |d value seems unlikely for this (low-energy) transition.
155TB G 107.925 150.070 5E1 0.245
155TB2 G %IG=0.0481 35$
155TBS G KC=0.205 3$LC=0.0311 5$MC=0.00677 10
155TBS G NC=0.001539 22$OC=0.000223 4$PC=1.150E-5 17
155TB G 178.93 50.028 9[M1,E2] 0.38 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.019 6$
155TBS G KC=0.29 7$LC=0.070 19$MC=0.0160 47
155TBS G NC=0.0036 11$OC=0.00051 12$PC=1.94E-5 72
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Value computed from Ice(K)=0.008 and
155TB2cG the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme).
155TB G 269.358 240.252 10M1+E2 0.11 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.173 7$
155TBS G KC=0.091 27$LC=0.0171 5$MC=0.00384 19
155TBS G NC=0.00088 4$OC=0.000129 3$PC=6.3E-6 24
155TB cG RI value obtained from analysis of a complex line (1980Ab17)
155TB G 334.963 190.179 6 J ?
155TB2 G %IG=0.123 4$
155TB L 466.782 13 7/2+ N
155TB E 0.16 4 9.72 11 0.16 4 1U
155TBS E CK=0.8250$CL=0.13426 2$CM+=0.039761 7
155TB G 131.946 110.030 9[M1,E2] 0.977 24
155TB2 G %IG=0.021 6$
155TBS G KC=0.69 16$LC=0.22 11$MC=0.052 25
155TBS G NC=0.0117 56$OC=0.00161 66$PC=4.5E-5 18
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.020 and
155TB2cG the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme).
155TB G 195.68 4 0.031 8M1 0.331
155TB2 G %IG=0.021 6$
155TBS G KC=0.280 4$LC=0.0403 6$MC=0.00881 13
155TBS G NC=0.00204 3$OC=0.000314 5$PC=2.07E-5 3
155TB G 216.85 4 0.19 4E1 0.0380
155TB2 G %IG=0.131 28$
155TBS G KC=0.0322 5$LC=0.00459 7$MC=0.000997 14
155TBS G NC=0.000228 4$OC=3.41E-5 5$PC=1.97E-6 3
155TB cG E |g not placed in the level scheme by 1980Ab17
155TB cG M given as (E1) by 1980Ab17, but small value of |a(K)exp
155TB2cG eliminates other mult assignments. Placement in level scheme also
155TB3cG indicates mult=E1.
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.021
155TB G 311.18 160.048 5E2 0.0558
155TB2 G %IG=0.0330 35$
155TBS G KC=0.0425 6$LC=0.01031 15$MC=0.00235 4
155TBS G NC=0.000534 8$OC=7.52E-5 11$PC=2.67E-6 4
155TB G 466.95 60.028 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.019 6$
155TB L 498.639 9 5/2+ D
155TB G 342.67 6 0.070 6E2 0.0418
155TB2 G %IG=0.048 4$
155TBS G KC=0.0323 5$LC=0.00734 11$MC=0.001666 24
155TBS G NC=0.000379 6$OC=5.38E-5 8$PC=2.06E-6 3
155TB G 433.150 131.04 3M1 0.0396
155TB2 G %IG=0.714 23$
155TBS G KC=0.0336 5$LC=0.00473 7$MC=0.001031 15
155TBS G NC=0.000238 4$OC=3.68E-5 6$PC=2.46E-6 4
155TB cG MR 1996KrZY report |d=0.04 {I+22-16} or 1.5 {I5}
155TB G 498.617 152.56 6M1+E2 +0.21 5 0.0271 5
155TB2 G %IG=1.76 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0229 4$LC=0.00324 5$MC=0.000705 11
155TBS G NC=0.000163 3$OC=2.52E-5 4$PC=1.67E-6 3
155TB cG MR from 1996KrZY
155TB L 508.394 19 1/2+,3/2+,5/2+
155TB E 0.0044 3 1.03 6 7.90 3 1.03 6
155TBS E EAV=266.92 84$CK=0.8311$CL=0.12731 2$CM+=0.037342 5
155TB G 352.47 110.020 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0137 28$
155TB G 508.44 4 1.74 7M1+E2 0.0201 62
155TB2 G %IG=1.20 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0168 55$LC=0.0026 6$MC=0.00057 11
155TBS G NC=0.00013 3$OC=2.0E-5 5$PC=1.19E-6 44
155TB L 517.541 15 3/2+,5/2+,7/2+ D
155TB E 0.000447 0.109 18 8.87 8 0.109 18
155TBS E EAV=262.89 84$CK=0.8312$CL=0.12738 2$CM+=0.037364 5
155TB cE LOGFT if J|p=7/2+, this transition is 1u. In that case,
155TB2cE log| {If{+1u}t}=9.83 {I8}.
155TB G 452.248 240.234 9M1+E2 0.0272 83
155TB2 G %IG=0.161 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0226 75$LC=0.0036 7$MC=0.00079 14
155TBS G NC=0.00018 4$OC=2.7E-5 6$PC=1.60E-6 60
155TB G 517.62 5 0.111 17E2 0.01329
155TB2 G %IG=0.076 12$
155TBS G KC=0.01079 16$LC=0.00195 3$MC=0.000436 6
155TBS G NC=9.97E-5 14$OC=1.462E-5 21$PC=7.24E-7 11
155TB L 544.889 15 7/2-
155TB cL 1980Bu04 report I|b{++}=0.20 {I3} for a |b{++} branch with
155TB2cL E(|e)=1556. The implied I(|e+|b{++}) value is too large to be
155TB3cL consistent with the decay scheme.
155TB G 294.89 5 0.070 5M1+E2 0.087 22
155TB2 G %IG=0.0481 35$
155TBS G KC=0.071 22$LC=0.0128 4$MC=0.00286 4
155TBS G NC=0.000656 11$OC=9.7E-5 6$PC=4.9E-6 19
155TB G 317.947 180.304 11M1 0.0890
155TB2 G %IG=0.209 8$
155TBS G KC=0.0753 11$LC=0.01072 15$MC=0.00234 4
155TBS G NC=0.000541 8$OC=8.34E-5 12$PC=5.55E-6 8
155TB L 549.603 10 3/2+
155TB G 322.27 4 0.040 4[E1] 0.01386
155TB2 G %IG=0.0275 28$
155TBS G KC=0.01177 17$LC=0.001640 23$MC=0.000356 5
155TBS G NC=8.17E-5 12$OC=1.233E-5 18$PC=7.49E-7 11
155TB G 484.158 131.56 4M1 0.0298
155TB2 G %IG=1.072 32$
155TBS G KC=0.0252 4$LC=0.00354 5$MC=0.000771 11
155TBS G NC=0.0001784 25$OC=2.76E-5 4$PC=1.85E-6 3
155TB G 549.643 141.40 3M1 0.0216
155TB2 G %IG=0.962 25$
155TBS G KC=0.0183 3$LC=0.00256 4$MC=0.000556 8
155TBS G NC=0.0001286 18$OC=1.99E-5 3$PC=1.334E-6 19
155TB cG MR 1996KrZY report |d=-0.13 {I7} if J|p=3/2+ or |d=0.29 {I6} if
155TB2cG J|p=5/2+
155TB L 652.031 13 5/2+
155TB G 134.552 140.019 6[M1,E2] 0.92 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.013 4$
155TBS G KC=0.65 15$LC=0.207 92$MC=0.048 23
155TBS G NC=0.0108 50$OC=0.00149 60$PC=4.3E-5 17
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.012 and
155TB2cG the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the level scheme).
155TB G 153.37 3 0.067 10E2 0.565
155TB2 G %IG=0.046 7$
155TBS G KC=0.346 5$LC=0.1694 24$MC=0.0398 6
155TBS G NC=0.00896 13$OC=0.001189 17$PC=1.86E-5 3
155TB G 401.96 110.051 6(E1+M2) 0.0097 17 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.035 4$
155TBS G KC=0.0082 14$LC=0.00118 23$MC=0.00026 5
155TBS G NC=5.9E-5 12$OC=9.0E-6 18$PC=5.6E-7 12
155TB cG MR |d=0.69 {I15}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.051 {I12} and the
155TB2cG listed mult. This value seems quite large. From RUL, and the |g
155TB3cG branching, one calculates T{-1/2}>1.7 ns for this level.
155TB G 425.03 3 0.089 5(E1+M2) 0.0085 14 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.0611 35$
155TBS G KC=0.0072 12$LC=0.00102 19$MC=0.00022 5
155TBS G NC=5.1E-5 10$OC=7.8E-6 15$PC=4.9E-7 10
155TB cG MR |d=0.34 {I+6-7}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I4} and the
155TB2cG listed mult. This value seems quite large.
155TB G 496.22 4 0.210 9M1 0.0280
155TB2 G %IG=0.144 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0237 4$LC=0.00333 5$MC=0.000724 11
155TBS G NC=0.0001674 24$OC=2.59E-5 4$PC=1.732E-6 25
155TB G 586.44 3 0.239 9M1 0.0183
155TB2 G %IG=0.164 7$
155TBS G KC=0.01554 22$LC=0.00217 3$MC=0.000471 7
155TBS G NC=0.0001090 16$OC=1.685E-5 24$PC=1.132E-6 16
155TB L 743.92 3 7/2+
155TB E 0.05 4 9.9 4 0.05 4 1U
155TBS E CK=0.8218$CL=0.13729 3$CM+=0.040827 9
155TB G 588.16 8 0.076 5(M1+E2+E0) 0.0139 43
155TB2 G %IG=0.0522 35$
155TB2 G FLAG=Q $
155TBS G KC=0.0117 38$LC=0.0018 4$MC=0.00038 9
155TBS G NC=8.9E-5 20$OC=1.3E-5 4$PC=8.3E-7 30
155TB cG CC since |D|p=no for this transition, the large |a(K)exp value,
155TB2cG 0.030 {I6}, is evidence for the presence of an E0 component. This
155TB3cG conclusion, however, is based on |D|p=no, and not solely on |a(K)exp,
155TB4cG since for |D|p=yes, mult=E1+M2, with a large |d value (as has been
155TB5cG reported for several transitions in this nuclide) would have been
155TBxcG proposed.
155TB G 678.38 5 0.291 16M1 0.01272
155TB2 G %IG=0.200 11$
155TBS G KC=0.01081 16$LC=0.001499 21$MC=0.000326 5
155TBS G NC=7.54E-5 11$OC=1.166E-5 17$PC=7.85E-7 11
155TB G 743.9 0.20 4[E2] 0.00551
155TB2 G %IG=0.137 28$
155TBS G KC=0.00458 7$LC=0.000724 11$MC=0.0001596 23
155TBS G NC=3.67E-5 6$OC=5.50E-6 8$PC=3.14E-7 5
155TB cG RI computed from Ice(K)=0.0009 and |a(K) for mult=E2. 1980Ab17
155TB2cG report I|g(743.64|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18} for the triplet only.
155TB L 760.626 21 3/2+
155TB E 0.234 21 8.39 4 0.234 21
155TBS E CK=0.8328$CL=0.1290$CM+=0.037885 4
155TB G 695.138 220.309 19M1+E2 0.0092 28
155TB2 G %IG=0.212 13$
155TBS G KC=0.0078 25$LC=0.0011 3$MC=0.00025 6
155TBS G NC=5.7E-5 14$OC=8.7E-6 23$PC=5.5E-7 19
155TB G 760.70 120.128 16M1+E2+E0 0.0074 22
155TB2 G %IG=0.088 11$
155TBS G KC=0.0063 19$LC=0.00091 22$MC=0.00020 5
155TBS G NC=4.6E-5 11$OC=7.0E-6 18$PC=4.4E-7 15
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.035 {I5}
155TB L 809.524 17 5/2+
155TB G 264.621 180.21 4[E1] 0.0227
155TB2 G %IG=0.144 28$
155TBS G KC=0.0193 3$LC=0.00271 4$MC=0.000590 9
155TBS G NC=0.0001352 19$OC=2.03E-5 3$PC=1.206E-6 17
155TB cG RI calculated from measured Ice(K)=0.004, assuming E1 mult.
155TB2cG 1980Ab17 do not report photons corresponding to this transition, yet
155TB3cG they report I|g values for the near-lying 248.6 and 269.3 gammas that
155TB4cG are comparable to that deduced for this one. This may indicate that
155TB5cG there is an admixture of M2 in this transition.
155TB G 653.92 6 0.176 12M1+E2 0.0107 33
155TB2 G %IG=0.121 8$
155TBS G KC=0.0090 29$LC=0.0013 4$MC=0.00029 7
155TBS G NC=6.7E-5 16$OC=1.02E-5 26$PC=6.4E-7 22
155TB G 743.64 5 0 APE0+M1+E2 0.0078 24
155TB2 G %IG AP 0.121 $
155TBS G KC=0.0066 21$LC=0.00096 24$MC=0.00021 5
155TBS G NC=4.8E-5 12$OC=7.4E-6 19$PC=4.7E-7 16
155TB cG RI 1980Ab17 report I|g(743.64|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18}.
155TB2cG From the values deduced for the other two members of this triplet, one
155TB3cG finds that they can account for essentially all of its observed
155TB4cG intensity. Thus, I|g(743.64) is quite small, possibly even zero.
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp>0.018, from Ice(K) and assuming that all the |g
155TB2cG intensity in this triplet is associated with this one |g. Thus, the
155TB3cG limit on this |a(K)exp value is a very conservative one.
155TB L 861.87 7 3/2+,5/2+
155TB E 0.122 14 8.60 5 0.122 14
155TBS E CK=0.8322$CL=0.1296$CM+=0.038105 5
155TB G 705.87 220.031 8
155TB2 G %IG=0.021 6$
155TB G 796.44 7 0.084 9M1+E2 0.0066 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.058 6$
155TBS G KC=0.0056 17$LC=0.00081 20$MC=0.00018 5
155TBS G NC=4.1E-5 10$OC=6.2E-6 16$PC=4.0E-7 13
155TB G 861.74 230.061 15M1 0.00706
155TB2 G %IG=0.042 10$
155TBS G KC=0.00601 9$LC=0.000827 12$MC=0.000180 3
155TBS G NC=4.15E-5 6$OC=6.43E-6 9$PC=4.34E-7 6
155TB L 891.137 10 3/2-
155TB E 4.10 9 7.053 13 4.10 9
155TBS E CK=0.8320$CL=0.12979 2$CM+=0.038173 5
155TB G 382.772 200.264 9E1(+M2) 0.0110 19 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.181 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0093 16$LC=0.0013 3$MC=0.00029 6
155TBS G NC=6.7E-5 14$OC=1.02E-5 22$PC=6.3E-7 14
155TB cG M from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I2}, one computes |d=0.11 {I+5-11}
155TB cG CC value for a pure E1 transition
155TB G 641.072 151.83 4E2 0.00780
155TB2 G %IG=1.257 33$
155TBS G KC=0.00643 9$LC=0.001068 15$MC=0.000236 4
155TBS G NC=5.43E-5 8$OC=8.07E-6 12$PC=4.38E-7 7
155TB G 664.173 183.28 8M1+E2 +0.31 4 0.0128623
155TB2 G %IG=2.25 6$
155TBS G KC=0.01091 20$LC=0.00153 3$MC=0.000333 6
155TBS G NC=7.69E-5 13$OC=1.186E-5 20$PC=7.90E-7 15
155TB cG MR weighted average of +0.36 {I5} (1977Al30), |g|g(|q); and
155TB2cG +0.30 {I15} (1984ShZN) and +0.14 {I10} (1996KrZY).
155TB G 825.60 40.190 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.131 8$
155TB G 891.13 3 0.86 3E1 1.48E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.591 22$
155TBS G KC=0.001268 18$LC=0.0001677 24$MC=3.62E-5 5
155TBS G NC=8.35E-6 12$OC=1.283E-6 18$PC=8.46E-8 12
155TB L 906.42 5(5/2-)
155TB E 0.015 9 9.5 3 0.015 9
155TBS E CK=0.8319$CL=0.12990 2$CM+=0.038209 5
155TB G 356.87 100.021 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0144 28$
155TB G 439.56 60.067 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0460 35$
155TB G 632.4 100.020 4(M2) 0.0438 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.0137 28$
155TBS G KC=0.0365 6$LC=0.00571 9$MC=0.001260 19
155TBS G NC=0.000292 5$OC=4.48E-5 7$PC=2.91E-6 5
155TB cG M |a(K)exp=0.048 {I11} is consistent with mult=M2. However,
155TB2cG the large |a(K)exp value could be evidence for an E0 component if
155TB3cG |D|p=no were assumed. Thus, the assignment mult=M2 depends to some
155TB4cG extent on the assumption that |D|p=yes, rather than |D|p=yes being
155TB5cG uniquely established by the value of mult.
155TB L 950.38 8 3/2-
155TB E 0.101 7 8.62 4 0.101 7
155TBS E CK=0.8315$CL=0.13022 2$CM+=0.038320 5
155TB G 723.46 8 0.146 9M1+E2 0.0084 25
155TB2 G %IG=0.100 6$
155TBS G KC=0.0070 22$LC=0.00103 25$MC=0.00022 6
155TBS G NC=5.2E-5 13$OC=7.9E-6 21$PC=5.0E-7 17
155TB cG MR from |g|g(|q), 1977Al30 find |d=-7 {I3} or |d=-0.43 {I13}
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.0068. This value lies midway between the |a(K)
155TB2cG values computed from these two |d's.
155TB L 1062.074 18 5/2-
155TB E 1.28 4 7.420 17 1.28 4
155TBS E CK=0.8302$CL=0.13115 2$CM+=0.038645 7
155TB G 811.98 4 0.59 3M1+E2 0.0063 19
155TB2 G %IG=0.405 21$
155TBS G KC=0.0054 16$LC=0.00077 19$MC=0.00017 4
155TBS G NC=3.9E-5 10$OC=5.9E-6 15$PC=3.8E-7 13
155TB G 835.16 3 0.370 13M1(+E2+E0)-0.62 38 0.0067 8
155TB2 G %IG=0.254 10$
155TBS G KC=0.0057 7$LC=0.00080 8$MC=0.000173 17
155TBS G NC=4.0E-5 4$OC=6.2E-6 7$PC=4.1E-7 5
155TB cG MR from 1977Al30, |g|g(|q)
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.0081 {I9}
155TB G 996.70 7 0.396 23E1 1.20E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.272 16$
155TBS G KC=0.001026 15$LC=0.0001351 19$MC=2.92E-5 4
155TBS G NC=6.72E-6 10$OC=1.034E-6 15$PC=6.86E-8 10
155TB G 1062.09 3 0.565 18E1 1.07E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.388 14$
155TBS G KC=0.000912 13$LC=0.0001198 17$MC=2.58E-5 4
155TBS G NC=5.96E-6 9$OC=9.18E-7 13$PC=6.11E-8 9
155TB L 1068.368 16 3/2-
155TB E 0.57 4 7.77 4 0.57 4
155TBS E CK=0.8301$CL=0.13121 2$CM+=0.038666 7
155TB G 841.53 3 0.408 15M1+E2 -0.25 8 0.0072917
155TB2 G %IG=0.280 11$
155TBS G KC=0.00620 15$LC=0.000857 18$MC=0.000186 4
155TBS G NC=4.30E-5 9$OC=6.65E-6 15$PC=4.48E-7 11
155TB cG MR from |g|g(|q). 1977Al30 also report |d|>10. This value has
155TB2cG not been adopted by the evaluator since it is not consistent with
155TB3cG |a(K)exp, whereas the smaller |d value gives an |a(K)exp in good
155TB4cG agreement with the measured one.
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.0061 {I8}.
155TB G 1003.03 100.239 21E1 1.18E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.164 15$
155TBS G KC=0.001014 15$LC=0.0001335 19$MC=2.88E-5 4
155TBS G NC=6.64E-6 10$OC=1.022E-6 15$PC=6.78E-8 10
155TB G 1068.18 3 0.84 3E1+M2 0.15 +4-6 0.0012614
155TB2 G %IG=0.577 22$
155TBS G KC=0.00108 11$LC=0.000144 17$MC=3.1E-5 4
155TBS G NC=7.2E-6 9$OC=1.11E-6 13$PC=7.4E-8 9
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00107 {I10}
155TB L 1120.001 23 7/2+
155TB E 0.289 17 8.54 3 0.289 17 1U
155TBS E CK=0.8122$CL=0.14444 6$CM+=0.04337 2
155TB G 802.87 60.025 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0172 21$
155TB G 845.78 7 0.070 7M1+E2 0.0058 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.048 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0049 15$LC=0.00070 17$MC=0.00015 4
155TBS G NC=3.5E-5 9$OC=5.4E-6 14$PC=3.5E-7 11
155TB G 848.98 3 0.260 15M1+E2 -3.3 +15-590.0044 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.179 11$
155TBS G KC=0.0037 5$LC=0.00055 6$MC=0.000121 11
155TBS G NC=2.8E-5 3$OC=4.2E-6 5$PC=2.5E-7 4
155TB cG M from 1996KrZY. From |a(K)exp=0.0060, 1980Ab17 report mult=M1.
155TB G 1120.11 5 0.109 15E2 0.00229
155TB2 G %IG=0.075 10$
155TBS G KC=0.00194 3$LC=0.000278 4$MC=6.07E-5 9
155TBS G NC=1.399E-5 20$OC=2.13E-6 3$PC=1.340E-7 19$IPC=6.10E-7 9
155TB L 1155.482 12 5/2-
155TB E 9.4 8 6.47 4 9.4 8
155TBS E CK=0.8289$CL=0.13212 3$CM+=0.038980 8
155TB G 394.54 80.041 14
155TB2 G %IG=0.028 10$
155TB G 610.62 12
155TB2 G %IG=0.028 10$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.0007, relative to
155TB2cG Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB G 820.40 120.047 7
155TB2 G %IG=0.032 5$
155TB G 838.48 5 0.188 10E2 0.00422
155TB2 G %IG=0.129 7$
155TBS G KC=0.00353 5$LC=0.000539 8$MC=0.0001184 17
155TBS G NC=2.72E-5 4$OC=4.11E-6 6$PC=2.43E-7 4
155TB G 884.42 50.088 7
155TB2 G %IG=0.060 5$
155TB G 905.515 213.58 8M1+E2 -0.15 4 0.0062010
155TB2 G %IG=2.46 7$
155TBS G KC=0.00528 8$LC=0.000726 11$MC=0.0001576 24
155TBS G NC=3.64E-5 6$OC=5.64E-6 9$PC=3.81E-7 6
155TB cG MR weighted average of: -0.27 {I13} (1977Al30, |g|g(|q)); and
155TB2cG -0.12 {I5} (1984ShZN) and -0.17 {I6} (1996KrZY).
155TB G 928.535 211.05 3M1+E2 -0.24 9 0.0057614
155TB2 G %IG=0.721 23$
155TBS G KC=0.00490 12$LC=0.000674 15$MC=0.000146 4
155TBS G NC=3.38E-5 8$OC=5.24E-6 12$PC=3.53E-7 9
155TB cG MR weighted average of -0.31 {I15} (1984ShZN) and -0.20 {I12}
155TB2cG (1996KrZY). From |g|g(|q), 1977Al30 report -0.93|<|d|<-0.28.
155TB G 999.68 3 3.56 10E1 1.19E-3
155TB2 G %IG=2.45 8$
155TBS G KC=0.001021 15$LC=0.0001343 19$MC=2.90E-5 4
155TBS G NC=6.68E-6 10$OC=1.028E-6 15$PC=6.83E-8 10
155TB cG MR 1996KrZY report |d(M2/E1)=0.01 {I6}
155TB G 1090.0 4.11 LE
155TB2 G %IG=2.82 4$
155TB cG RI I|g(1089.8|g+1090.0|g)=4.01 {I10}
155TB G 1155.47 3 3.05 7E1 9.23E-4
155TB2 G %IG=2.10 6$
155TBS G KC=0.000783 11$LC=0.0001025 15$MC=2.21E-5 3
155TBS G NC=5.10E-6 8$OC=7.85E-7 11$PC=5.25E-8 8$IPC=9.62E-6 14
155TB L 1255.85 3 7/2-
155TB E ?
155TB cE $|eK=0.8272; |eL=0.13341 {I3}; |eM+=0.03943 {I1}
155TB cE IE$0.26 {I6} from intensity balance is incompatible with
155TB2cE second-forbidden |DJ=2, |D|p=no transition, possibly due
155TB2cE to missing |g-ray intensity at this level
155TB G 445.84 8 0.032 5(E1+M2) 0.0075 12 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.0220 34$
155TBS G KC=0.0064 10$LC=0.00091 17$MC=0.00020 4
155TBS G NC=4.5E-5 9$OC=6.9E-6 13$PC=4.3E-7 8
155TB cG MR |d=0.70 {I15}, computed from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I10} and the
155TB2cG listed mult. This value seems quite large.
155TB G 981.82 3 0.307 10E1 1.23E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.211 8$
155TBS G KC=0.001055 15$LC=0.0001390 20$MC=3.00E-5 5
155TBS G NC=6.92E-6 10$OC=1.064E-6 15$PC=7.06E-8 10
155TB G 1100.1 0.326 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.2240 33$
155TB cG RI I|g(1098.2|g+1100.1|g)=0.305 {I21} (1980Ab17)
155TB L 1294.960 25 5/2-
155TB E 0.79 8 7.40 5 0.79 8
155TBS E CK=0.8264$CL=0.13401 3$CM+=0.03964 1
155TB G 403.57 4 0.304 15M1 0.0476
155TB2 G %IG=0.209 11$
155TBS G KC=0.0403 6$LC=0.00570 8$MC=0.001241 18
155TBS G NC=0.000287 4$OC=4.43E-5 7$PC=2.96E-6 5
155TB G 745.2 0.50 10[E1] 0.00211
155TB2 G %IG=0.34 7$
155TBS G KC=0.00180 3$LC=0.000240 4$MC=5.19E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.196E-5 17$OC=1.83E-6 3$PC=1.197E-7 17
155TB cG RI computed from Ice(K)=0.0009 and |a(K) for mult=E1. 1980Ab17
155TB2cG report I|g(743.65|g+743.9|g+745.2|g)=0.497 {I18} for the triplet only.
155TB G 750.07 7 0.124 9E2 0.00541
155TB2 G %IG=0.085 6$
155TBS G KC=0.00450 7$LC=0.000709 10$MC=0.0001563 22
155TBS G NC=3.59E-5 5$OC=5.39E-6 8$PC=3.09E-7 5
155TB G 978.87 100.059 5E2 0.00303
155TB2 G %IG=0.0405 35$
155TBS G KC=0.00255 4$LC=0.000375 6$MC=8.21E-5 12
155TBS G NC=1.89E-5 3$OC=2.87E-6 4$PC=1.758E-7 25
155TB G 1024.00 180.039 8
155TB2 G %IG=0.027 6$
155TB G 1295.00 4 0.262 4E1+M2 0.23 +6-7 0.0010915
155TB2 G %IG=0.180 4$
155TBS G KC=0.00087 13$LC=0.000117 19$MC=2.5E-5 4
155TBS G NC=5.9E-6 10$OC=9.1E-7 15$PC=6.1E-8 10$IPC=6.52E-5 20
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00088 {I12}.
155TB L 1452.00 3 3/2-,5/2-
155TB E 0.40 11 7.49 12 0.40 11
155TBS E CK=0.8220$CL=0.13722 5$CM+=0.04076 2
155TB G 1117.0 0.596 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.409 6$
155TB cG RI I|g(1115.2|g+1117.0|g)=0.578 {I18} (1980Ab17)
155TB G 1201.87 80.052 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0357 35$
155TB G 1386.37 6 0.1546 24E1 7.86E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.1062 23$
155TBS G KC=0.000568 8$LC=7.39E-5 11$MC=1.592E-5 23
155TBS G NC=3.67E-6 6$OC=5.67E-7 8$PC=3.82E-8 6$IPC=0.0001233 18
155TB G 1451.83 4 0.240 5E1 7.80E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.165 4$
155TBS G KC=0.000525 8$LC=6.82E-5 10$MC=1.469E-5 21
155TBS G NC=3.39E-6 5$OC=5.23E-7 8$PC=3.53E-8 5$IPC=0.0001683 24
155TB L 1470.98 4 3/2+,5/2+
155TB E 0.093 9 8.09 5 0.093 9
155TBS E CK=0.8213$CL=0.13772 6$CM+=0.04093 2
155TB G 408.80 100.014 3(M2) 0.1621 Q
155TB2 G %IG=0.0096 21$
155TBS G KC=0.1333 19$LC=0.0225 4$MC=0.00502 7
155TBS G NC=0.001162 17$OC=0.0001777 25$PC=1.123E-5 16
155TB cG M deduced from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I4}. From RUL and the |g
155TB2cG branching, one infers that T{-1/2}>9 ns for the 1470.99 level.
155TB G 972.36 4 0.119 12M1 0.00527
155TB2 G %IG=0.082 8$
155TBS G KC=0.00449 7$LC=0.000615 9$MC=0.0001335 19
155TBS G NC=3.09E-5 5$OC=4.78E-6 7$PC=3.24E-7 5
155TB L 1492.635 17 5/2-
155TB E 1.61 4 6.823 15 1.61 4
155TBS E CK=0.8205$CL=0.13835 6$CM+=0.04115 2
155TB G 1221.52 6 0.088 20E1 8.60E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.060 14$
155TBS G KC=0.000709 10$LC=9.26E-5 13$MC=2.00E-5 3
155TBS G NC=4.61E-6 7$OC=7.10E-7 10$PC=4.76E-8 7$IPC=3.33E-5 5
155TB G 1242.63 4 0.1290 17M1 0.00295
155TB2 G %IG=0.0886 17$
155TBS G KC=0.00250 4$LC=0.000340 5$MC=7.38E-5 11
155TBS G NC=1.707E-5 24$OC=2.64E-6 4$PC=1.80E-7 3$IPC=1.209E-5 17
155TB G 1265.69 160.022 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.015 4$
155TB G 1336.83 3 0.716 22E1 7.97E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.492 17$
155TBS G KC=0.000605 9$LC=7.88E-5 11$MC=1.698E-5 24
155TBS G NC=3.92E-6 6$OC=6.04E-7 9$PC=4.06E-8 6$IPC=9.17E-5 13
155TB G 1427.19 3 0.604 8E1 7.81E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.415 8$
155TBS G KC=0.000541 8$LC=7.02E-5 10$MC=1.513E-5 22
155TBS G NC=3.49E-6 5$OC=5.39E-7 8$PC=3.63E-8 5$IPC=0.0001511 22
155TB G 1492.61 4 0.836 3E1 7.81E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.574 9$
155TBS G KC=0.000501 7$LC=6.50E-5 9$MC=1.400E-5 20
155TBS G NC=3.23E-6 5$OC=4.99E-7 7$PC=3.37E-8 5$IPC=0.000197 3
155TB cG RI the listed uncertainty (from 1980Ab17) seems unrealistically
155TB2cG small
155TB L 1638.848 16 5/2-
155TB E 2.9 7 6.30 11 2.9 7
155TBS E CK=0.8124 2$CL=0.1443 1$CM+=0.04325 4
155TB G 570.449 200.279 9M1+E2 +0.37 +22-170.0185 13
155TB2 G %IG=0.192 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0157 12$LC=0.00222 13$MC=0.00048 3
155TBS G NC=0.000112 6$OC=1.72E-5 10$PC=1.14E-6 9
155TB cG MR from 1996KrZY
155TB G 576.82 11
155TB2 G %IG=0.192 7$
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Ice(K)=0.0014, relative to
155TB2cG Ice(K)=2.870 for the 226.9 E1 transition.
155TB cG M since this transition has |DJ=0,|D|p=no, its mult can have
155TB2cG components of M1, E2, E0. If it were predominantly E2, the inferred
155TB3cG I|g value, based on Ice(K), is sufficiently large relative to the
155TB4cG near-lying gammas that it should have been seen. This suggests that
155TB5cG mult is mainly M1, or even E0.
155TB G 878.23 80.059 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0405 35$
155TB G 1089.8 4.11 LE
155TB2 G %IG=2.82 4$
155TB cG RI I|g(1089.8|g+1090.0|g)=4.01 {I10} (1980Ab17)
155TB G 1093.70 100.053 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0364 35$
155TB G 1304.05 4 0.254 7E1(+M2) 0.16 +7-16 0.0009414
155TB2 G %IG=0.174 5$
155TBS G KC=0.00075 12$LC=9.9E-5 17$MC=2.1E-5 4
155TBS G NC=4.9E-6 9$OC=7.6E-7 14$PC=5.1E-8 9$IPC=7.15E-5 20
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00075 {I12}.
155TB G 1367.77 3 1.171 20E1+M2 0.16 +6-10 0.0009111
155TB2 G %IG=0.804 18$
155TBS G KC=0.00068 9$LC=9.0E-5 13$MC=1.9E-5 3
155TBS G NC=4.5E-6 7$OC=6.9E-7 10$PC=4.7E-8 7$IPC=0.000109 3
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00069 {I9}. From
155TB2cG nuclear-orientation studies, 1984ShZN report 0.14|<|d(M2/E1)|<1.23.
155TB G 1388.82 6 0.148 3M1 0.00231
155TB2 G %IG=0.1017 25$
155TBS G KC=0.00193 3$LC=0.000261 4$MC=5.66E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.310E-5 19$OC=2.03E-6 3$PC=1.383E-7 20$IPC=4.56E-5 7
155TB G 1412.08 7 0.104 4M1 0.00223
155TB2 G %IG=0.0714 29$
155TBS G KC=0.00186 3$LC=0.000251 4$MC=5.45E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.259E-5 18$OC=1.95E-6 3$PC=1.330E-7 19$IPC=5.30E-5 8
155TB G 1573.56 50.144 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.099 4$
155TB L 1656.39 6 5/2-
155TB E 0.268 22 7.30 4 0.268 22
155TBS E CK=0.8110 2$CL=0.1454 2$CM+=0.04361 5
155TB G 912.47 6 0.32 3E1 1.42E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.220 21$
155TBS G KC=0.001212 17$LC=0.0001601 23$MC=3.46E-5 5
155TBS G NC=7.97E-6 12$OC=1.225E-6 18$PC=8.09E-8 12
155TB cG M the value of |a(K)exp is sufficiently small that mult=M1 and
155TB2cG higher multipole orders can realistically be excluded for this |g
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.00047 {I11}
155TB G 1429.50 100.032 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0220 28$
155TB G 1656.05 240.038 7
155TB2 G %IG=0.026 5$
155TB L 1664.913 13 5/2-
155TB E 4.70 14 6.037 17 4.70 14
155TBS E CK=0.8103 2$CL=0.1459 2$CM+=0.04379 5
155TB G 596.22 120.062 9M1+E2 0.0134 42
155TB2 G %IG=0.043 6$
155TBS G KC=0.0113 37$LC=0.0017 4$MC=0.00037 9
155TBS G NC=8.5E-5 20$OC=1.3E-5 4$PC=8.0E-7 29
155TB G 602.95 100.035 6M1+E2 0.0131 41
155TB2 G %IG=0.024 4$
155TBS G KC=0.0110 36$LC=0.0016 4$MC=0.00036 8
155TBS G NC=8.3E-5 19$OC=1.3E-5 3$PC=7.8E-7 28
155TB G 773.57 5 0.148 11E2 0.00504
155TB2 G %IG=0.102 8$
155TBS G KC=0.00420 6$LC=0.000657 10$MC=0.0001446 21
155TBS G NC=3.32E-5 5$OC=4.99E-6 7$PC=2.89E-7 4
155TB G 920.94 4 0.158 8E1 1.39E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.109 6$
155TBS G KC=0.001191 17$LC=0.0001573 22$MC=3.40E-5 5
155TBS G NC=7.83E-6 11$OC=1.203E-6 17$PC=7.95E-8 12
155TB G 1012.89 4 0.435 20E1 1.16E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.299 14$
155TBS G KC=0.000996 14$LC=0.0001310 19$MC=2.83E-5 4
155TBS G NC=6.52E-6 10$OC=1.003E-6 14$PC=6.66E-8 10
155TB G 1115.2 0.596 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.409 6$
155TB cG RI I|g(1115.2|g+1117.0|g)=0.578 {I18}
155TB G 1166.22 3 2.473 23E1 9.11E-4
155TB2 G %IG=1.699 29$
155TBS G KC=0.000770 11$LC=0.0001007 15$MC=2.17E-5 3
155TBS G NC=5.01E-6 7$OC=7.72E-7 11$PC=5.16E-8 8$IPC=1.243E-5 18
155TB cG MR 1984ShZN report |d(M2/E1)=0.06 {I12}
155TB G 1198.14 90.043 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0295 28$
155TB G 1329.85 110.029 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0199 34$
155TB G 1393.83 4 0.384 3E1+M2 0.23 +6-8 0.0010113
155TB2 G %IG=0.264 4$
155TBS G KC=0.00076 11$LC=0.000101 16$MC=2.2E-5 4
155TBS G NC=5.1E-6 8$OC=7.8E-7 13$PC=5.2E-8 9$IPC=0.000123 4
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.00076 {I11}
155TB G 1414.93 4 0.362 12M1 0.00222
155TB2 G %IG=0.249 9$
155TBS G KC=0.00185 3$LC=0.000250 4$MC=5.42E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.253E-5 18$OC=1.94E-6 3$PC=1.324E-7 19$IPC=5.39E-5 8
155TB cG MR 1996KrZY report |d=-0.4 {I+2-5} or -1.9 +1.0-1.7
155TB G 1437.97 4 0.417 4M1 0.00215
155TB2 G %IG=0.286 5$
155TBS G KC=0.001778 25$LC=0.000241 4$MC=5.22E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.207E-5 17$OC=1.87E-6 3$PC=1.275E-7 18$IPC=6.17E-5 9
155TB G 1509.27 4 0.365 12E1(+M2) -0.13 7 0.000848
155TB2 G %IG=0.251 9$
155TBS G KC=0.00054 7$LC=7.1E-5 10$MC=1.54E-5 22
155TBS G NC=3.5E-6 5$OC=5.5E-7 8$PC=3.7E-8 6$IPC=0.000206 5
155TB cG MR from 1996KrZY
155TB G 1599.57 4 0.388 10E1 7.96E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.267 8$
155TBS G KC=0.000446 7$LC=5.77E-5 8$MC=1.244E-5 18
155TBS G NC=2.87E-6 4$OC=4.43E-7 7$PC=3.00E-8 5$IPC=0.000276 4
155TB G 1664.98 6 1.27 5E1 8.11E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.87 4$
155TBS G KC=0.000418 6$LC=5.40E-5 8$MC=1.162E-5 17
155TBS G NC=2.68E-6 4$OC=4.14E-7 6$PC=2.81E-8 4$IPC=0.000325 5
155TB cG MR 1984ShZN report |d(M2/E1)=0.09 {I6}. 1996KrZY report
155TB2cG |d(M2/E1)=-0.03 {I9}.
155TB L 1750.098 17 5/2-
155TB E 2.19 7 6.151 18 2.19 7
155TBS E CK=0.8008 3$CL=0.15294 21$CM+=0.04628 8
155TB G 688.4 7 0.012 9M1(+E2+E0) 0.0094 29
155TB2 G %IG=0.008 6$
155TBS G KC=0.0079 25$LC=0.0012 3$MC=0.00025 6
155TBS G NC=5.9E-5 14$OC=9.0E-6 23$PC=5.6E-7 20
155TB cG CC |a(K)exp=0.0167
155TB G 940.516 250.445 13E1 1.34E-3
155TB2 G %IG=0.306 10$
155TBS G KC=0.001144 16$LC=0.0001510 22$MC=3.26E-5 5
155TBS G NC=7.52E-6 11$OC=1.155E-6 17$PC=7.64E-8 11
155TB G 1098.2 0.326 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.2240 33$
155TB cG RI I|g(1098.2|g+1100.1|g)=0.305 {I21} (1980Ab17)
155TB G 1232.34 120.066 8
155TB2 G %IG=0.045 6$
155TB G 1251.24 3 1.382 6E1 8.40E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.949 14$
155TBS G KC=0.000680 10$LC=8.87E-5 13$MC=1.91E-5 3
155TBS G NC=4.41E-6 7$OC=6.80E-7 10$PC=4.56E-8 7$IPC=4.70E-5 7
155TB cG RI the listed uncertainty (from 1980Ab17) seems unrealistically
155TB2cG small
155TB cG MR 1984ShZN report |d(M2/E1)=0.14 {I30}. 1996KrZY report -0.16
155TBxcG {I10}.
155TB G 1283.32 140.0332 13
155TB2 G %IG=0.0228 10$
155TB cG E incorrectly given as 1223.32 in 1980Ab17
155TB G 1479.22 4 0.793 3E1 7.81E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.545 8$
155TBS G KC=0.000509 8$LC=6.60E-5 10$MC=1.422E-5 20
155TBS G NC=3.28E-6 5$OC=5.07E-7 7$PC=3.42E-8 5$IPC=0.000188 3
155TB cG RI the listed uncertainty (from 1980Ab17) seems unrealistically
155TB2cG small
155TB G 1594.52 60.080 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0550 29$
155TB G 1684.80 5 0.163 6E1 8.17E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.112 4$
155TBS G KC=0.000409 6$LC=5.29E-5 8$MC=1.139E-5 16
155TBS G NC=2.63E-6 4$OC=4.06E-7 6$PC=2.75E-8 4$IPC=0.000340 5
155TB G 1750.45 60.0421 19
155TB2 G %IG=0.0289 14$
155TB L 1793.643 24 5/2+
155TB E 0.484 15 6.671 18 0.484 15
155TBS E CK=0.7933 4$CL=0.1584 3$CM+=0.04822 10
155TB G 537.1 30.012 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0082 34$
155TB G 725.24 4 0.283 10E1(+M2) 0.0025 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.194 7$
155TBS G KC=0.00213 23$LC=0.00029 4$MC=6.3E-5 8
155TBS G NC=1.44E-5 18$OC=2.2E-6 3$PC=1.44E-7 19
155TB G 1050.0 30.025 10
155TB2 G %IG=0.017 7$
155TB G 1459.00 230.045 7M1 0.00209
155TB2 G %IG=0.031 5$
155TBS G KC=0.001720 24$LC=0.000233 4$MC=5.04E-5 7
155TBS G NC=1.166E-5 17$OC=1.81E-6 3$PC=1.232E-7 18$IPC=6.92E-5 10
155TB G 1522.51 90.045 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0309 28$
155TB G 1543.78 90.0153 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.0105 12$
155TB G 1567.04 100.029 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0199 28$
155TB G 1637.87 50.120 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0824 30$
155TB G 1728.02 70.060 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0412 21$
155TB G 1793.64 60.070 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0481 28$
155TB L 1835.82 6 3/2,5/2
155TB E 0.097 11 7.21 5 0.097 11
155TBS E CK=0.7831 6$CL=0.1660 5$CM+=0.05091 15
155TB G 767.6 10.054 LE
155TB2 G %IG=0.0371 5$
155TB cG RI I|g(765.4|g+767.6|g)=0.047 {I7} (1980Ab17)
155TB G 944.24 110.050 6
155TB2 G %IG=0.034 4$
155TB G 1184.05 100.035 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.0240 35$
155TB G 1609.14 140.026 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0179 21$
155TB G 1769.60 200.0031 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.00213 34$
155TB L 1860.95 7 1/2+,3/2,5/2
155TB E 0.043 3 7.46 4 0.043 3
155TBS E CK=0.7747 8$CL=0.1722 6$CM+=0.05311 20
155TB G 1590.04 90.041 3
155TB2 G %IG=0.0282 21$
155TB G 1795.30 100.0210 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.0144 14$
155TB L 1865.82 3 5/2-
155TB E 0.389 21 6.48 3 0.389 21
155TBS E CK=0.7728 8$CL=0.1736 6$CM+=0.05362 21
155TB G 609.94 4 0.116 6M1(+E2) 2.4 LT 0.0133 34
155TB2 G %IG=0.080 4$
155TBS G KC=0.0112 30$LC=0.0016 4$MC=0.00036 7
155TBS G NC=8.3E-5 16$OC=1.3E-5 3$PC=8.0E-7 23
155TB cG M deduced from |a(K)exp=0.012 {I4}. 1980Ab17 do not report a
155TB2cG mult value for this transition.
155TB G 1213.1 50.048 24
155TB2 G %IG=0.033 16$
155TB G 1316.28 4 0.229 7E1 8.05E-4
155TB2 G %IG=0.157 5$
155TBS G KC=0.000622 9$LC=8.10E-5 12$MC=1.746E-5 25
155TBS G NC=4.03E-6 6$OC=6.21E-7 9$PC=4.17E-8 6$IPC=7.98E-5 12
155TB G 1348.39 7 0.091 7E1+M2 0.91 16 0.0030 5
155TB2 G %IG=0.063 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0025 4$LC=0.00035 6$MC=7.7E-5 13
155TBS G NC=1.8E-5 3$OC=2.8E-6 5$PC=1.8E-7 3$IPC=5.9E-5 9
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.0025 {I4}
155TB G 1356.85 100.036 9
155TB2 G %IG=0.025 6$
155TB G 1548.73 160.0079 15
155TB2 G %IG=0.0054 10$
155TB G 1710.08 110.0188 14
155TB2 G %IG=0.0129 10$
155TB G 1866.17 250.0177 25
155TB2 G %IG=0.0122 17$
155TB L 1868.95 5 3/2+,5/2+
155TB E 0.100 8 7.05 4 0.100 8
155TBS E CK=0.7715 8$CL=0.1745 6$CM+=0.05395 22
155TB G 962.44 70.087 10 E1+M2 0.24 +6-7 0.0020 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.060 7$
155TBS G KC=0.0017 3$LC=0.00023 5$MC=5.0E-5 10
155TBS G NC=1.15E-5 23$OC=1.8E-6 4$PC=1.17E-7 23
155TB cG MR computed by the evaluator from |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3}
155TB G 1641.9 30.0105 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.0072 12$
155TB G 1713.09 90.0259 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.0178 12$
155TB G 1803.60 80.0211 14
155TB2 G %IG=0.0145 10$
155TB G 1869.00 100.00060 10
155TB2 G %IG=0.00041 7$
155TB L 1911.19 4 (5/2)-
155TB E 0.124 11 6.73 5 0.124 11
155TBS E CK=0.7482 14$CL=0.1917 11$CM+=0.0601 4
155TB G 459.05 3 0.159 14M1+E2 0.0262 80
155TB2 G %IG=0.109 10$
155TBS G KC=0.0218 72$LC=0.0034 7$MC=0.00076 13
155TBS G NC=0.00017 3$OC=2.6E-5 6$PC=1.54E-6 58
155TB G 1577.90 100.0110 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.0076 14$
155TB G 1846.2 30.0059 17
155TB2 G %IG=0.0041 12$
155TB L 1913.60 4 5/2-
155TB E 0.105 6 6.79 3 0.105 6
155TBS E CK=0.7464 15$CL=0.1930 11$CM+=0.0606 4
155TB G 618.59 4 0.146 8M1 0.01601
155TB2 G %IG=0.100 6$
155TBS G KC=0.01360 19$LC=0.00189 3$MC=0.000412 6
155TBS G NC=9.52E-5 14$OC=1.472E-5 21$PC=9.89E-7 14
155TB G 1758.10 100.0037 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.00254 28$
155TB G 1913.60 100.00070 10
155TB2 G %IG=0.00048 7$
155TB L 1954.72 4 (3/2,5/2)-
155TB E 0.096 11 6.52 6 0.096 11
155TBS E CK=0.701 4$CL=0.2264 23$CM+=0.0728 9
155TB G 289.81 4 0.032 12[M1,E2] 0.092 23
155TB2 G %IG=0.022 8$
155TBS G KC=0.074 23$LC=0.0136 3$MC=0.00303 5
155TBS G NC=0.000693 10$OC=0.000102 6$PC=5.2E-6 20
155TB cG RI photons not observed. Value computed using Ice(K)=0.0024 and
155TB2cG the |a(K) values for mult=M1,E2 (from the decay scheme).
155TB G 462.06 8 0.052 7M1+E2 0.0257 79
155TB2 G %IG=0.036 5$
155TBS G KC=0.0214 71$LC=0.0034 7$MC=0.00074 13
155TBS G NC=0.00017 3$OC=2.6E-5 6$PC=1.52E-6 57
155TB G 1889.22 80.0317 24
155TB2 G %IG=0.0218 17$
155TB G 1954.76 110.0203 20
155TB2 G %IG=0.0139 14$
155TB L 1991.78 6 3/2-
155TB E 0.047 6 6.42 7 0.047 6
155TBS E CK=0.601 9$CL=0.299 7$CM+=0.0999 24
155TB G 871.90 8 0.044 6M2 0.01782
155TB2 G %IG=0.030 4$
155TBS G KC=0.01496 21$LC=0.00224 4$MC=0.000491 7
155TBS G NC=0.0001137 16$OC=1.752E-5 25$PC=1.153E-6 17
155TB G 1764.86 90.010 4
155TB2 G %IG=0.0069 27$
155TB G 1835.55 150.0143 14
155TB2 G %IG=0.0098 10$