153SM 153PM B- DECAY 1988WIZY,1983MAYP,1995GR1920NDS 202012
153SM H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 170, 1 (2020)$CUT=16-Aug-2020$
153SM c The decay scheme is from 1988WiZY with |g|g coincidences data from
153SM2c 1983MaYP and added |b branch intensities from 1995Gr19 and
153SM3c 1997Gr09.
153SM c 1962Ko10: produced by {+154}Sm(|g,p); report T{-1/2} and 4 |g's.
153SM c 1968Na21: level half-lives from |g|g(t).
153SM c 1970SeZY: report 9 |g's.
153SM c 1978PiZQ, 1979PiZP: produced from {+235}U fission; report 20 |g's
153SM2c and scheme with 13 excited levels.
153SM c 1983MaYP: produced from {+252}Cf fission and chemical separation;
153SM2c report 32 |g's and |g|g coincidences.
153SM c 1988GrZY: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c report T{-1/2}.
153SM c 1988WiZY: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c private communication, report 50 |g's.
153SM c 1990An31: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c report T{-1/2} (same group as 1988GrZY and 1988WiZY).
153SM c 1990Ba57: produced from {+252}Cf fission and chemical separation;
153SM2c show decay scheme (same group as 1988GrZY, 1988WiZY, and
153SM3c 1990An31).
153SM c 1993Gr17: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c report Q value from |b spectrum measured with Ge detector in
153SM3c coincidence with |g rays.
153SM c 1995Gr19: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c measured I{-|b-} to levels below 70 keV from total absorption
153SM3c |g spectra.
153SM c 1997Gr09: produced by {+252}Cf fission and isotope separation;
153SM2c measured I{-|b-} to all levels from total absorption
153SM3c |g spectra.
153SM cB For the levels above 80 keV with depopulating |g's, the
153SM2cB I|b{+-} are from |g-ray intensity balances, but if the TAGS
153SM3cB results differ significantly, they are noted in a comment.
153SM4cB Below 80 keV, from total absorption |g (TAGS) measurement
153SM5cB (1995Gr19, 1997Gr09), I|b{+-}(0+7+35+53+65)=40% {I6},
153SM6cB which combined with I|b{+-}(35+53+65) from |g-ray
153SM7cB intensity balances produces I|b{+-}(0+7) |? 10% {I5}; finally
153SM7cB I|b{+-}(7) is chosen to be approximately equal to I|b{+-}(0),
153SM8cB which gives total I|g |? 95% {I5} to g.s.
153SM cG There are a number of other |g rays reported in
153SM2cG {+152}Sm(n,|g) from the levels reported here, but which have
153SM3cG not been observed in the {+153}Pm |b- decay. These |g's are
153SM4cG generally weak and have not been included here.
153SM cG |g|g coincidences are from 1983MaYP.
153SM cG E From 1988WiZY who made use of the precise energies from
153SM2cG {+152}Sm(n,|g) (1969Sm04).
153SM cG RI From unweighted average of values of 1978PiZQ, 1983MaYP,
153SM2cG and 1988WiZY with typical uncertainties assigned. Below 50 keV,
153SM3cG the intensity balance at the 35-keV level and the I{-|b-}
153SM4cG data of 1995Gr19 and 1997Gr09 were used to determine that the
153SM5cG values of 1983MaYP were preferred.
153SM cG M,MR From {+153}Sm Adopted Gammas and comments here.
153SM cL From total absorption |g (TAGS) spectra, the |b- decay
153SM2cL intensity as a function of the excitation energy has been
153SM3cL deduced (1997Gr09) independent of the |g-ray intensity balances.
153SM4cL These data imply |b- decay to additional levels, especially
153SM5cL above the highest level with |g decay at 630 keV.
153SM cL E From least-squares fit to |g energies.
153SM cL T For excited levels, from |g|g(t) (1968Na21).
153SM cL E(R) Pseudolevel from TAGS data analysis.
153SM CL BAND(A) K|p=3/2+ band, 3/2[651]+3/2[402] states
153SM CL BAND(B) K|p=3/2- band, 3/2[521] state
153SM CL BAND(D) K|p=3/2- band, 3/2[532] state
153SM CL BAND(E) K|p=3/2+ band, 3/2[402]+3/2[651] states
153SM DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
153SM DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
153SM2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
153PM P 0.0 5/2- 5.25 M 2 1912 9
153SM N 0.181 16 0.181 16 1.0 1.0
153SM cN NR$From total I|g |? 95% {I5} to g.s. (see header comment on |b{+-}
153SM2cN radiations table)
153SM PN 3
153SM G 68.47 3 0.23 3
153SM G 75.29 3 0.30 4
153SM G 75.940 17 0.54 4
153SM G 133.51 3 0.44 5
153SM G 414.26 13 0.40 3
153SM G 482.44 10 0.48 4
153SM G 494.32 17 0.26 3
153SM G 627.84 10 0.44 4
153SM G 681.52 15 0.31 4
153SM G 902.16 15 0.54 4
153SM L 0.0 3/2+ 46.284 H 4 A
153SM cL J,T$adopted values
153SM B 5 6.5
153SMS B EAV=727.7 40
153SM L 7.534 4 5/2+ A
153SM B 6 6.5
153SMS B EAV=724.4 40
153SM G 7.535 5 1.82 27 M1 114.6
153SM cG E Calculated from |g energy differences in {+152}Sm(n,|g).
153SM2cG This transition was not observed directly, but its existence
153SM3cG was inferred (1969Sm04) from L x ray intensities.
153SM cG RI$Chosen to give approximately equal |b- feeding of levels
153SM2cG at 0 and 7.5 keV.
153SM L 35.845 5 3/2- 0.1 NS LT B
153SM B 24 5 5.8
153SMS B EAV=711.9 40
153SM G 28.321 12 19 3 E1 1.515 C
153SMS G LC=1.194 17$MC=0.258 4
153SMS G NC=0.0560 8$OC=0.00709 10$PC=0.000240 4
153SM G 35.853 10 82 10E1 0.782 C
153SMS G LC=0.616 9$MC=0.1328 19
153SMS G NC=0.0290 4$OC=0.00378 6$PC=0.0001397 20
153SM L 53.538 7 7/2+ A
153SM B 5 4 6.5
153SMS B EAV=704.1 40
153SM G 45.99 6 1.4 3M1+E2 1.0 +10-5 24 13 C
153SMS G LC=19 10$MC=4.3 24
153SMS G NC=0.94 51$OC=0.117 62$PC=5.7E-4 19
153SM G 53.55 4 0.30 3E2 25.7 C
153SMS G KC=3.96 6$LC=16.83 25$MC=3.93 6
153SMS G NC=0.857 13$OC=0.1052 16$PC=0.000207 3
153SM L 65.477 21 9/2+ A
153SM G 57.97 23 0.23 4 (E2) 18.6 4
153SMS G KC=3.78 6$LC=11.5 3$MC=2.68 7
153SMS G NC=0.585 14$OC=0.0720 17$PC=0.000178 3
153SM L 90.872 4 5/2- 0.52 NS 16 B
153SM B 6 5 6.5
153SMS B EAV=687.7 40
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 6.3%.
153SM G 37.335 10 3.6 9E1 0.698 C
153SMS G LC=0.550 8$MC=0.1185 17
153SMS G NC=0.0259 4$OC=0.00339 5$PC=0.0001271 18
153SM G 55.031 8 1.27 7M1(+E2) 0.6 LT 11.3 18 C
153SMS G KC=7.5 6$LC=3.0 18$MC=0.67 43
153SMS G NC=0.148 92$OC=0.019 12$PC=0.00047 5
153SM G 83.339 5 11.5 6E1 0.451 C
153SMS G KC=0.379 6$LC=0.0571 8$MC=0.01222 18
153SMS G NC=0.00271 4$OC=0.000380 6$PC=1.79E-5 3
153SM G 90.870 5 18.2 9E1 0.357 C
153SMS G KC=0.301 5$LC=0.0447 7$MC=0.00957 14
153SMS G NC=0.00213 3$OC=0.000299 5$PC=1.436E-5 21
153SM L 127.299 4 3/2- D
153SM B 42 6 5.5
153SMS B EAV=671.7 40
153SM G 36.74 6 1.0 3 M1(+E2) 0.73 LE 28 23 C
153SMF G FL=90.872
153SMS G LC=22 18$MC=5.0 42
153SMS G NC=1.09 91$OC=0.14 11$PC=0.00146 23
153SM cG CC |a(M1)=5.0 and |a(E2)=140, and intensity balance at
153SM2cG 90-keV level suggests |a < 55.
153SM G 91.455 5 10.8 6 M1(+E2+E0) 2.7 6 C
153SMS G KC=1.68 18$LC=0.80 55$MC=0.18 13
153SMS G NC=0.041 28$OC=0.0052 34$PC=9.1E-5 28
153SM G 119.763 5 44.1 22E1 0.1688 C
153SMS G KC=0.1427 20$LC=0.0206 3$MC=0.00440 7
153SMS G NC=0.000982 14$OC=0.0001400 20$PC=7.09E-6 10
153SM G 127.298 5 100 5E1 0.1430 C
153SMS G KC=0.1210 17$LC=0.01733 25$MC=0.00371 6
153SMS G NC=0.000828 12$OC=0.0001184 17$PC=6.06E-6 9
153SM L 174.180 10 7/2- B
153SM B 0.8 1 7.2
153SMS B EAV=651.2 40
153SM G 108.700 19 0.78 5[E1] 0.220
153SMS G KC=0.185 3$LC=0.0270 4$MC=0.00577 8
153SMS G NC=0.001288 18$OC=0.000183 3$PC=9.09E-6 13
153SM G 120.74 6 0.29 5[E1] 0.1651
153SMS G KC=0.1396 20$LC=0.0201 3$MC=0.00430 6
153SMS G NC=0.000960 14$OC=0.0001369 20$PC=6.94E-6 10
153SM G 138.43 5 0.27 5[E2] 0.736 &
153SMS G KC=0.463 7$LC=0.212 3$MC=0.0486 7
153SMS G NC=0.01069 15$OC=0.001377 20$PC=2.11E-5 3
153SM G 166.641 10 2.50 14E1 0.0689
153SMS G KC=0.0585 9$LC=0.00821 12$MC=0.001753 25
153SMS G NC=0.000393 6$OC=5.67E-5 8$PC=3.03E-6 5
153SM L 182.903 6 5/2- 17 NS 7 D
153SM B 7.7 8 6.2
153SMS B EAV=647.4 40
153SM cB IB The TAGS data give 8.4%, or 9.4% for I{-|b-}(174+183).
153SM G 91.99 5 0.71 12[M1,E2] 2.7 6 C
153SMS G KC=1.65 17$LC=0.78 53$MC=0.18 13
153SMS G NC=0.040 27$OC=0.0051 33$PC=8.9E-5 27
153SM G 129.369 9 6.2 3E1 0.1369 C
153SMS G KC=0.1158 17$LC=0.01657 24$MC=0.00354 5
153SMS G NC=0.000792 11$OC=0.0001132 16$PC=5.81E-6 9
153SM G 147.060 9 2.52 14M1,E2 0.581 17 C
153SMS G KC=0.43 5$LC=0.115 48$MC=0.026 12
153SMS G NC=0.0058 25$OC=7.8E-4 29$PC=2.42E-5 64
153SM G 175.370 11 12.3 7E1 0.0601
153SMS G KC=0.0510 8$LC=0.00713 10$MC=0.001524 22
153SMS G NC=0.000342 5$OC=4.94E-5 7$PC=2.66E-6 4
153SM G 182.900 8 15.2 8E1 0.0537
153SMS G KC=0.0456 7$LC=0.00636 9$MC=0.001358 19
153SMS G NC=0.000304 5$OC=4.41E-5 7$PC=2.39E-6 4
153SM L 194.6 3 (5/2+)
153SM G 194.61 27 0.12 8[M1,E2] 0.244 17
153SMS G KC=0.19 3$LC=0.041 10$MC=0.0091 25
153SMS G NC=0.00203 53$OC=0.00028 6$PC=1.10E-5 30
153SM L 262.322 15 (7/2)+
153SM B 0.61 6 7.2
153SMS B EAV=612.8 39
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 0.95%, or 1.67% for I{-|b-}(262+265+276).
153SM G 171.41 6 0.29 4[E1] 0.0639
153SMS G KC=0.0542 8$LC=0.00759 11$MC=0.001622 23
153SMS G NC=0.000364 6$OC=5.26E-5 8$PC=2.82E-6 4
153SM G 196.86 6 0.68 7[M1,E2] 0.236 17
153SMS G KC=0.19 3$LC=0.039 10$MC=0.0087 23
153SMS G NC=0.00195 49$OC=0.00027 6$PC=1.07E-5 30
153SM G 208.71 6 0.38 3[M1,E2] 0.198 18
153SMS G KC=0.16 3$LC=0.032 7$MC=0.0071 17
153SMS G NC=0.0016 4$OC=0.00022 4$PC=9.1E-6 25
153SM G 254.794 15 1.58 9M1,E2 0.110 16
153SMS G KC=0.089 18$LC=0.0163 15$MC=0.0036 4
153SMS G NC=0.00080 9$OC=0.000114 7$PC=5.2E-6 15
153SM L 265.73 5 (7/2)- D
153SM B 0.05 1 8.3
153SMS B EAV=611.4 39
153SM G 138.43 5 0.27 5 &
153SM L 276.701 10 (3/2)+
153SM B 0.45 3 7.3
153SMS B EAV=606.6 39
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 0.72%, or 1.67% for I{-|b-}(262+265+276).
153SM G 223.13 4 0.37 3(E2) 0.1451 C
153SMS G KC=0.1072 15$LC=0.0296 5$MC=0.00667 10
153SMS G NC=0.001477 21$OC=0.000198 3$PC=5.44E-6 8
153SM G 269.177 11 1.12 7[M1,E2] 0.093 15 C
153SMS G KC=0.076 16$LC=0.0136 9$MC=0.0030 3
153SMS G NC=0.00067 5$OC=9.6E-5 3$PC=4.5E-6 13
153SM G 276.72 4 1.44 8M1(+E2+E0) 0.086 14 C
153SMS G KC=0.070 15$LC=0.0124 7$MC=0.00273 20
153SMS G NC=0.00061 4$OC=8.75E-5 17$PC=4.2E-6 13
153SM L 321.13 3 (3/2)+ E
153SM B 0.122 14 7.9
153SMS B EAV=587.4 39
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 0.14%.
153SM G 321.13 3 0.63 4M1 0.0675 C
153SMS G KC=0.0575 8$LC=0.00794 12$MC=0.001702 24
153SMS G NC=0.000386 6$OC=5.80E-5 9$PC=3.63E-6 5
153SM L 356.49 6 (5/2+) E
153SM B 0.103 12 7.9
153SMS B EAV=572.1 39
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 0.20%, or 0.27 for I{-|b-}(356+362).
153SM G 291.11 12 0.12 2
153SM G 302.85 8 0.30 3
153SM G 349.12 13 0.15 2
153SM L 362.21 8 (5/2)+
153SM B 0.070 9 8.1
153SMS B EAV=569.7 39
153SM G 354.69 10 0.21 2M1 0.0520
153SMS G KC=0.0443 7$LC=0.00610 9$MC=0.001307 19
153SMS G NC=0.000296 5$OC=4.45E-5 7$PC=2.79E-6 4
153SM G 362.20 12 0.16 2M1(+E2) 0.041 9
153SMS G KC=0.034 9$LC=0.0054 4$MC=0.00118 7
153SMS G NC=0.000265 17$OC=3.8E-5 4$PC=2.02E-6 62
153SM L 450.062 11 (5/2)-
153SM cL E$2005Bu21 assigned a dominant configuration of 5/2[523] from
153SM2cL results of their (t,p) study. The same assignment is given in
153SM3cL 'adopted levels'. The earlier assignment (1998He06) as member of
153SM4cL the 1/2[530] band is rejected.
153SM B 0.87 9 6.9
153SMS B EAV=532.0 39
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 1.2%.
153SM G 173.403 24 0.67 5E1 0.0619 C
153SMS G KC=0.0526 8$LC=0.00736 11$MC=0.001572 22
153SMS G NC=0.000352 5$OC=5.09E-5 8$PC=2.74E-6 4
153SM G 359.6 4 0.07 3 C
153SM G 396.517 16 1.55 9 C
153SM G 442.515 16 2.50 13
153SM L 510 R
153SM B 0.33
153SMS B EAV=506.6 39
153SM L 630.24 6
153SM B 0.51 5 6.9
153SMS B EAV=455.9 38
153SM cB IB The TAGS data gives 0.76%.
153SM G 622.71 8 1.13 7
153SM G 630.24 8 1.68 9
153SM L 820 R
153SM B 0.09
153SMS B EAV=377.5 37
153SM L 1000 R
153SM B 0.14
153SMS B EAV=305.4 36
153SM L 1100 R
153SM B 0.27
153SMS B EAV=266.4 35
153SM L 1250 R
153SM B 0.54
153SMS B EAV=209.8 34
153SM L 1430 R
153SM B 0.35
153SMS B EAV=145.4 32
153SM L 1530 R
153SM B 0.10
153SMS B EAV=111.6 30