152PM    152ND B- DECAY                1993SH23                  13NDS    201311
152PM  H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
152PM cB IB$From the intensity imbalance at each level
152PM cB IB(D)$I|b=46% 6 for the sum of the branches to the g.s. and the 25
152PM2cB level. See the comment on mult(25|g)
152PM cG           The |a(K)exp were obtained by normalizing the ce and |g
152PM2cG spectra to give |a(K)exp(121.8|g, E2)=0.657 (1993Sh23). The 121.8|g is
152PM3cG a 2+ to 0+ transition in the decay of {+152}Pm. |a(K)exp have been
152PM4cG corrected by evaluator to give |a(K)(121.8|g)=0.678
152PM cG E,RI      From 1993Sh23
152PM cG RI(A)     Determined from coincidence data (1993Sh23)
152PM cG M(B)$From the requirement of an intensity balance at the 44 and 16
152PM2cG levels, and the assumption that log| {Ift}>5.9 for the 0+ to 1- |b{+-}
152PM3cG branches to these levels, one gets |a(28.5|g)=10~{I3}. Since
152PM4cG |a(theory)= 9.26 for mult=M1, one can adopt |a(28.5|g)=11~{I2}. The
152PM5cG upper limit allows an E2 admixture of |d<0.09
152PM cG M(C)$I|b(g.s. + 25 level)=46% 6 from |S\ I|b=54~{I6} for the branches
152PM2cG to the other levels. From the requirement of an intensity balance at
152PM3cG the g.s. and 25 level, one gets |a(25|g)=486~{I90} if all the feeding
152PM4cG is to the 25 level, and |a=21~{I2} if the feeding is all to the g.s.
152PM5cG with |a(theory)=13.5 (M1) and 826 (E2) these |a(exp) values give
152PM6cG mult(25|g)=E2+M1 with 0.08<|d<1.5
152PM cL           1993Sh23: {+235}U(n,F), ms; measured |g, ce, |g|g
152PM cL           1990Sh24: {+235}U(n,F), ion chem; measured |g, |g|g,
152PMxcL |b|g(t), T{-1/2}
152PM cL           1971Da19: measured |g, |g|g
152PM cL           Other: 1969Wa25
152PM cL E         From least squares fit to E|g
152PM cL J         From adopted levels
152PM cL T         From 1990Sh24
152ND  P 0.0         0+                11.4 M    2              1105      19
152PM  N 0.26       3          1.0       1.0
152PM PN                                                                     2
152PM cN NR$From a comparison of I|g(278|g) with I|g(116.8|g) in {+151}Nd |b{+-}
152PM2cN decay 1993Sh23 obtained I|g normalization=0.29~{I3} using
152PM3cN I|g(116.8|g)=43.4% 24 (1988Si15). The evaluator adopts I|g
152PM4cN normalization=0.26~{I3} based on I|g(116.8|g)=39.0% 24 (2009Si01)
152PM  L 0.0         1+
152PM  B              52     LE             4.9  GE
152PMS B EAV=384 8
152PM2 B FLAG=D$
152PM  L 16.03     4   0-,1-,2-          2.1 NS  10
152PM  B               2     LT             6.3  GT
152PMS B EAV=376.5 78
152PM  G   16.09   5   16.7  13  E1                     7.05  12
152PM cG M$|a<24 from I|g and the requirement that I(|g+ce)<100
152PM  L   25.02   7  (0+,1+,2+)         1.0 NS  LE
152PM  B              52     LE             4.9  GE
152PMS B EAV=373 8
152PM2 B FLAG=D$
152PM  G 25.1      1  0.38   3 E2+M1
152PM2 G FLAG=C$
152PM  L 44.45     4   0-,1-,2-
152PM  B               3.8   LT             6.0  GT
152PMS B EAV=365 8
152PM  G 19.5      1    0.61 5 [E1]                    4.14   9
152PM  G 28.50     10   3.2  3 M1+(E2)   0.09    LT    11      2
152PM2 G FLAG=B$
152PM  G 44.44     5   21.3  23[E1]                    0.411
152PM  L  200.48   10
152PM  B               0.1   LT             7.3  GT
152PMS B EAV=303 8
152PM  G  156.0    2   0.335 25[E1,M1,E2]               0.26  18
152PM  G  184.5    2   0.41  4 [E1,M1,E2]               0.16  11
152PM  G  200.5    2   0.103 15[E1,M1,E2]               0.13  9
152PM  L  220.96   18
152PM  B               0.034  9            7.77  12
152PMS B EAV=295 8
152PM  G  176.6    2   0.145 8 [E1,M1,E2]               0.18  12
152PM  L 294.55    4 1+
152PM  B               47    6             4.49   7
152PMS B EAV=266 8
152PM  G   94.1    2   0.209 25[E1,M1,E2]               1.6   13
152PM  G 250.15    5  63     3 E1                      0.0226
152PM cG M         |a(K)exp=0.016 {I3} (1993Sh23)
152PM  G  269.4    2   0.95  12[E1,M1,E2]              0.06   4
152PM  G 278.56    5  100    6 E1                      0.0171
152PM cG M         |a(K)exp=0.013 {I3} (1993Sh23)
152PM  G 294.47    5   11.3  6 M1(+E2)    1.5    LT    0.071   7
152PM cG M         |a(K)exp=0.066 {I14} (1993Sh23)
152PM  L  319.17   14
152PM  G  302.9    2   0.36  5 [E1,M1,E2]               0.04  3
152PM  L  330.47   14
152PM  G  314.4    2   0.31  5 [E1,M1,E2]               0.04  3
152PM  L  450.80   25  0,1
152PM  B              0.11    2            6.80   9
152PMS B EAV=207 7
152PM  G  250.3    3   0.33  5 [E1,M1,E2]               0.07  5             A
152PM  G  406.4    4   0.08  3 [E1,M1,E2]               0.020 14
152PM  L  570.78   10  1+
152PM  B              1.44   19            5.38   8
152PMS B EAV=164 7
152PM  G  240.5    2   0.32  4 [E1,M1,E2]               0.08  5
152PM  G  276.1    2   0.24  5  [M1,E2]                 0.082 12            A
152PM  G  350.0    3   0.04  2 [E1,M1,E2]               0.030 20
152PM  G 526.3     3   0.28  5 [E1]
152PM  G  545.7    2   3.2   3  [M1,E2]                0.013  3
152PM  G  570.7    2   1.36  16 [M1,E2]                0.011  3
152PM  L  592.40   10  1+
152PM  B               1.65  22            5.26   8
152PMS B EAV=156 7
152PM  G  261.4    3   0.102 23[E1,M1,E2]               0.06  4             A
152PM  G  273.2    3   0.20  7 [E1,M1,E2]               0.06  4             A
152PM  G  392.0    3   0.08  2 [E1,M1,E2]               0.022 15
152PM  G 547.7     2   0.42  3 [E1]                    0.00336
152PM  G  567.5    3   0.35  6  [M1,E2]                 0.012 3
152PM  G 576.7     2   1.31  16[E1]                    0.00300
152PM  G  592.5    2   3.8   3  [M1,E2]                0.010  3
152PM  L  659.90   12  1+
152PM  B               0.46  7             5.61  10
152PMS B EAV=133 7
152PM  G  340.5    2   0.36  8 [E1,M1,E2]              0.032  22            A
152PM  G 365.4     2   0.16  3 [M1,E2]                 0.037  8             A
152PM  G 635.0     2   0.73  9 [M1,E2]                 0.0088 22
152PM  G 660.0     3   0.48  6 [M1,E2]                 0.0080 20