152EU 152EU IT DECAY (96 M) 1965TA03,1975PR05 13NDS 201311
152EU H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
152EU cG I(|g+ce)(39.75|g):I(|g+ce)(18.21|g):I(|g+ce)(89.857|g)=100:80
152EU2cG \ {I30}:130 {I30} (1965Ta03), deduced from relative ce intensities.
152EU cG E,RI From 1975Pr05, except where noted otherwise.
152EU cG E(A)$From 1965Ta03 (ce data)
152EU cG E(B) From 1970Re08
152EU cL Measured: |g, ce (1965Ta03,1975Pr05,1963Ki18); (ce)(ce),
152EU2cL |g(ce) (1965Ta03)
152EU cL The decay scheme is that proposed by 1965Ta03, except
152EU2cL for the 77|g which was seen only by 1975Pr05 and a 12.6|g
152EU3cL known from (n,|g)
152EU cL J From adopted levels
152EU DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3a (30-Jun-2013) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
152EU cG MR$If no value given it was assumed |d=1.00 for E2/M1, |d=1.00 for
152EU2cG E3/M2 and |d=0.10 for the other multipolarities
152EU P 147.81 11 8- 96 M 1
152EU N 0.697 5 0.697 5 1.0
152EU PN 3
152EU cN NR$From I(|g+ce)(89|g)+weighted average of I(|g+ce)(77|g) and
152EU2cN I(|g+ce)(12.6|g)=100
152EU L 0.0 3-
152EU L 77.23 3- 38 NS 4
152EU cL T$From Adopted Levels
152EU G 77.23 4 0.98 7 M1+E2 0.10 3 3.91 6
152EUS G KC=3.27 5$LC=0.498 20$MC=0.108 5
152EUS G NC=0.0247 11$OC=0.00388 14$PC=0.000362 6
152EU cG M,MR from adopted gammas
152EU L 89.849 4+ 384 NS 10
152EU cL T$From Adopted Levels. 1965Ta03 report 400~ns~{I100}
152EU G 12.598 15 0.41 5 [E1] 14.70 S
152EUS G LC=11.51 17$MC=2.58 4
152EUS G NC=0.546 8$OC=0.0628 9$PC=0.00236 4
152EU cG E from adopted gammas. Not seen in 96-min {+152}Eu IT decay.
152EU cG RI from I|g/I|g(89.847|g)=0.0041 {I5} in Adopted Gammas
152EU G 89.849 6 100 E1 0.379 6 B
152EUS G KC=0.318 5$LC=0.0480 7$MC=0.01035 15
152EUS G NC=0.00232 4$OC=0.000347 5$PC=2.61E-5 4
152EU cG E$The evaluator has increased the authors' original value of E=89.847
152EU2cG by 17 parts per million to correct for the change in the value of the
152EU3cG 411 {+198}Au standard line
152EU cG M from |a(K)exp=0.30 {I5} (1965Ta03) based on (L| x ray)(K| x
152EU2cG ray)/(L| x ray)(|g). Others: |a(K)exp|<0.31 (1963Ki18), 0.28 {I3}
152EU3cG (1975Pr05) based on K| x ray/|g. K/L=7.2 {I10} (1965Ta03)
152EU L 108.06 5+ 20 NS LE
152EU cL T no delay observed in (ce)(ce) (1965Ta03)
152EU G 18.21 4 1.8 3 M1+E2 0.042 +8-9 51 4
152EUS G LC=40 3$MC=8.8 7
152EUS G NC=1.99 15$OC=0.306 19$PC=0.0256 4
152EU cG M,MR$From L1:L2:L3=100:15~{I5}:15~{I5}, M/L1=0.50~{I15} (1965Ta03)
152EU L 147.81 11 8- 96 M 1 M2
152EU cL T$From 1975Pr05. Others: 95~min~{I10} (1965Ta03), 96~min~{I5}
152EU2cL (1963Ki18)
152EU G 39.75 10 E3 7.49E3 16 143.5 10A
152EUS G L/T=0.753 11$M/T=0.197 6
152EUS G N/T=0.0441 13$O/T=0.00564 17$P/T=4.00E-6 12
152EUS G LC=5.64E3 12$MC=1.48E3 3
152EUS G NC=331 7$OC=42.2 9$PC=0.0300 7
152EU cG TI$From 100/normalization factor
152EU cG M$L1:L2:L3=2~{I2}:100:100~{I30}, L/M=2.7~{I+7-2} (1965Ta03). The
152EU2cG subshell ratios are consistent with mult=E2 or E3. L/M(theory)=4.26
152EU3cG (E2), 3.82 (E3) slightly favors mult=E3. B(E2)(W.u.)=2|*10{+-10} would
152EU4cG be unusually small, whereas B(E3)(W.u.)=0.00013 is reasonable. Mult=E3
152EU5cG is thus ADOPTED