152SM 152EU EC DECAY (9.3116 H) 13NDS 201311
152SM H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
152SM DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.3 (9-Dec-2011) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
152SM c Measured:
152SM c |g: 2007Ku20, 1986Pa14, 1984Bu35, 1975Pr05, 1973MeYA,
152SM2c 1971Ba63, 1971Ii02, 1970Re08, 1969Va09
152SM c ce: 1990Ka35, 1986Pa14, 1979Ar16, 1975Sc32, 1960Ma11,
152SMxc 1957Na01
152SM c e+: 1985Co23
152SM c |b{++}: 1959An31, 1958Al99
152SM c |g|g: 1975Pr05, 1975Sc32, 1971Ba63
152SM c |g|g(t): 1965Hu02
152SM c |g|g(|q): 1974Gu01 1960De16, 1959Wo52
152SM c
152SM cG $All the unplaced gammas from 9.3-h {+152}Eu decay are listed in this
152SM2cG dataset. Some of them May belong in {+152}Gd following |b{+-} decay
152SM cG E,RI$Weighted average of data of 2007Ku20, 1975Pr05, 1973MeXQ, and
152SM2cG 1971Ba63, except for the E0 transitions where data are from 1979Ar16.
152SM3cG For the data of 1973MeXQ, see the comment in the {+152}Eu |b{+-}
152SM4cG (9.3-h) dataset. New transitions reported only by 2007Ku20 are noted
152SM cG E(A),RI(A)$Reported only by 2007Ku20
152SM cG E(B),RI(B)$Reported by 2007Ku20; however, the transition is obscured.
152SM2cG The energy is a rounded-off value from 13-y Eu decay
152SM cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Mult data from this dataset are given in
152SM2cG comments. The |a(K)exp values have been deduced from the adopted I|g
152SM3cG values with Ice(K) obtained as weighted averages of data of 1960Ma11,
152SM4cG 1975Sc32, and 1979Ar16 normalized to |a(K)(E2)=0.03103 for the 344|g in
152SM5cG Gd
152SM cL $The decay scheme is that given in 2007Ku20. IT is based on earlier
152SM2cL work, but the authors have added many weak transitions, and in
152SM3cL particular have shown that the 1041, 1086, and 1293 levels are
152SM4cL populated in this decay. They find no evidence supporting the existence
152SM5cL of a 1290 level, previously postulated in this decay
152SM cL J From adopted levels
152EU P 45.5998 4 0- 9.3116 H 13 1874.6 7
152SM N 0.525 10 0.525 10 0.27 3 3.70
152SM PN 3
152SM cN NR,BR From I(|g+ce)(344|g {+152}Gd)/|b{+-}=0.034 {I5} (from
152SM2cN ce(K)/|b{+-} in 1957Na01)
152SM G 160.0 50.005 3 ?
152SM G 218.1 30.0003 2
152SM G 256.99 220.007 3
152SM G 340.1 30.035 13
152SM G 387.8 30.005 3
152SM G 703.7 30.005 3 ?
152SM G 796.1 30.024 10
152SM G 915.7 40.07 1
152SM cG RI from 1971Ba63
152SM G 1039.2 50.057 12
152SM G 1137.5 30.09 6
152SM G 1207.3 60.020 7
152SM G 1406.5 50.005 3
152SM G 1420 10.004 3
152SM L 0.0 0+ STABLE
152SM E 0.0064 8 0.205 25 8.65 8 0.211 26
152SMS E EAV=411.86 31$CK=0.8155$CL=0.1196$CM+=0.03451
152SM cE E E|b+=890 {I5} (1959An31), 895 {I5} (1958Al99)
152SM cE IB weighted average
152SM2cE of 0.0071% {I14} (1979Ar16, I|b{++}/Ice(K)(964|g)=0.64 {I10}) and
152SM3cE 0.0060% {I10} (1959An31, from I|b{++}/I|b{+-}); other: 0.007%
152SMxcE (1958Al99)
152SM L 121.78 3 2+ 1.43 NS 4
152SM cL T from 1965Hu02
152SM E 0.0007 LT 0.2 LT 9.7 GT 0.2 LT 1U
152SMS E EAV=376.76 31$CK=0.8305$CL=0.1284$CM+=0.03737
152SM cE E E|b+=770 {I30} (1959An31)
152SM cE IB I|b{++} per parent decay: 0.0020% {I5} (1959An31), 0.004%
152SMxcE (1958Al99)
152SM G 121.77 3 49.4 8E2 1.155
152SMS G KC=0.678 10$LC=0.370 6$MC=0.0854 12$NC+=0.0212 3
152SMS G NC=0.0188 3$OC=0.00239 4$PC=3.00E-5 5
152SM cG M$From |a(K)exp=0.74 {I4}, K/L=1.8, and
152SM2cG K:L1:L2:L3=110:10:26:25 (1960Ma11)
152SM L 366.45 4 4+
152SM G 244.66 3 0.159 11E2 0.1074
152SMS G KC=0.0808 12$LC=0.0207 3$MC=0.00465 7$NC+=0.001176 17
152SMS G NC=0.001033 15$OC=0.0001395 20$PC=4.18E-6 6
152SM L 684.76 4 0+
152SM cL J (563|g)(122|g)(|q) consistent with J=0 (1974Gu01)
152SM E 0.128 16 8.46 8 0.128 16
152SMS E CK=0.8377$CL=0.1258$CM+=0.03642
152SM G 562.98 3 1.55 3E2 0.00941
152SMS G KC=0.00779 11$LC=0.001274 18$MC=0.000278 4$NC+=7.18E-5 10
152SMS G NC=6.24E-5 9$OC=9.00E-6 13$PC=4.52E-7 7
152SM cG M$From |a(K)exp=0.0092~{I21}. |a(K)exp gives mult=E2(+M1) with |d>0.8;
152SM2cG however, placement from a J=0 level rules out any admixture
152SM G 684.85 20 E0 0.0201 21
152SM cG E from 1979Ar16
152SM cG TI$Weighted average of Ice(K)=0.020~{I2} (1979Ar16) and 0.0163~{I16}
152SM2cG (1986Pa14) with Ice(K)/|S\ Ice=0.880 (E0 theory). The evaluator has
152SM3cG adjusted the value from 1986Pa14, quoted as
152SM4cG Ice(K)/I|g(563|g)=0.0094~{I17}, to correspond to the present Ice(K)/I|g
152SM5cG intensity scale and adopted I|g(563|g)
152SM cG M |a(K)exp>0.5 (1979Ar16); K/L>5.9 (1975Sc32); |r=0.26 {I3}
152SMxcG (1990Ka35)
152SM L 810.44 4 2+
152SM G 125.43 17 0.0025 3
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 443.96 4 0.149 16(E2) 0.01772
152SMS G KC=0.01441 21$LC=0.00259 4$MC=0.000569 8$NC+=0.0001464 21
152SMS G NC=0.0001274 18$OC=1.81E-5 3$PC=8.19E-7 12
152SM G 688.68 5 0.458 13E0+M1+E2 0.0077 20
152SMS G KC=0.0065 18$LC=0.00092 19$MC=0.00020 4$NC+=5.2E-5 11
152SMS G NC=4.5E-5 10$OC=6.7E-6 15$PC=4.0E-7 12
152SM cG M$From |a(K)exp=0.037~{I4} and |d(Q/D)=+19~{I+5-9} one gets
152SM2cG mult=E0+M1+E2
152SM cG MR |d(E2/M1)=+19 {I+5-4}, I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=6.5 {I3}
152SM2cG (adopted |g's)
152SM G 810.49 7 0.167 7(E2) 0.00393
152SMS G KC=0.00331 5$LC=0.000487 7$MC=0.0001050 15$NC+=2.74E-5 4
152SMS G NC=2.37E-5 4$OC=3.48E-6 5$PC=1.96E-7 3
152SM L 963.40 3 1-
152SM E 26 3 5.92 7 26 3
152SMS E CK=0.8351$CL=0.1278$CM+=0.03712
152SM G 152.77 16 0.0126 11[E1] 0.0872
152SMS G KC=0.0739 11$LC=0.01043 15$MC=0.00223 4$NC+=0.000575 9
152SMS G NC=0.000499 8$OC=7.19E-5 11$PC=3.79E-6 6
152SM G 278.7 3 [E1] 0.0177
152SMS G KC=0.01513 22$LC=0.00206 3$MC=0.000440 7$NC+=0.0001143 17
152SMS G NC=9.90E-5 15$OC=1.451E-5 21$PC=8.27E-7 12
152SM cG RI$The transition is obscured
152SM G 841.63 4 100 2E1 1.44E-3
152SMS G KC=0.001234 18$LC=0.0001597 23$MC=3.39E-5 5$NC+=8.89E-6 13
152SMS G NC=7.67E-6 11$OC=1.147E-6 16$PC=7.12E-8 10
152SM cG M |a(K)exp=0.00123 {I12}; K/L=5.5 {I15} (1975Sc32)
152SM G 963.38 4 82.1 15[E1] 1.11E-3
152SMS G KC=0.000951 14$LC=0.0001225 18$MC=2.60E-5 4$NC+=6.82E-6 10
152SMS G NC=5.88E-6 9$OC=8.81E-7 13$PC=5.50E-8 8
152SM cG E from 1984Bu35
152SM L 1041.11 9 3-
152SM G 674.46 16 0.0025622
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 919.27 24 0.0045 7
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM L 1082.88 5 0+
152SM cL J (961|g)(122|g)(|q) consistent with J=0 (1974Gu01)
152SM E 0.150 19 8.04 8 0.150 19
152SMS E CK=0.8333$CL=0.1292$CM+=0.03757
152SM G 119.44 15 0.073 6
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 272.43 5 0.070 4(E2) 0.0761
152SMS G KC=0.0584 9$LC=0.01382 20$MC=0.00309 5$NC+=0.000784 11
152SMS G NC=0.000687 10$OC=9.37E-5 14$PC=3.08E-6 5
152SM cG M |a(K)exp=0.10 {I4}
152SM G 398.00 15 E0 0.0137 20
152SM cG E from 1979Ar16
152SM cG TI$Weighted average of Ice(K)=0.013~{I2} (1979Ar16) and 0.0096~{I30}
152SM2cG (1986Pa14) with Ice(K)/|S\ Ice=0.878 (E0 theory). The evaluator has
152SM3cG adjusted the value from 1986Pa14, quoted as
152SM4cG Ice(K)/I|g(961|g)=0.0062~{I19}, to correspond to the present Ice(K)/I|g
152SM5cG intensity scale and adopted I|g(961|g)
152SM cG M |a(K)exp>0.1 (1979Ar16); |r<0.1 (1990Ka35)
152SM cG I(ce(K))/I|g(961|g)=0.0062 {I19} (1986Pa14)
152SM G 961.14 14 0.90 5[E2] 0.00270
152SMS G KC=0.00229 4$LC=0.000325 5$MC=6.99E-5 10$NC+=1.83E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.579E-5 23$OC=2.34E-6 4$PC=1.361E-7 19
152SM cG RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 1.49~{I14} (1973MeXQ), 1.5~{I4} (1971Ba63).
152SM2cG the transition is not seen by 1975Pr05
152SM cG M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I17}
152SM G 1082.8 5 E0 0.0012 6
152SM cG E from 1979Ar16
152SM cG TI$From Ice(K)=0.0010~{I5} (1979Ar16) and Ice(K)/Ice=0.880 (E2 theory)
152SM cG M |a(K)exp>0.1 (1979Ar16); |r<0.016 (1990Ka35)
152SM L 1086.1 3 2+
152SM G 964.1
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SM G 1085.9
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SM L 1292.66 15 2+
152SM G 329.4
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SM G 926.3
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SM G 1292.8
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SM L 1510.79 3 1-
152SM E 0.87 10 6.60 7 0.87 10
152SMS E CK=0.8172$CL=0.14112 5$CM+=0.04168 2
152SM G 218.10 15 0.0042 5
152SM G 424.3 4 0.0012 5
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 427.9 0.0006 LT
152SM cG E,RI$Limit reported by 2007Ku20. E|g is a rounded-off value from the
152SM2cG level energies
152SM G 469.97 20 0.0039 6
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 547.36 8 0.067 4 [M1,E2] 0.014 4
152SMS G KC=0.011 4$LC=0.0017 3$MC=0.00036 7$NC+=9.5E-5 17
152SMS G NC=8.2E-5 15$OC=1.21E-5 24$PC=7.0E-7 22
152SM G 700.28 14 0.073 5[E1] 0.00208
152SMS G KC=0.001785 25$LC=0.000233 4$MC=4.95E-5 7$NC+=1.297E-5 19
152SMS G NC=1.119E-5 16$OC=1.669E-6 24$PC=1.025E-7 15
152SM G 826.01 6 0.204 12
152SM cG RI$Value of 0.0050~{I25} reported by 1973MeXQ is probably a typo
152SM G 1389.03 4 5.75 12E1+M2 -0.025 12 7.03E-411
152SMS G KC=0.000494 8$LC=6.28E-5 10$MC=1.332E-5 20$NC+=0.0001329 19
152SMS G NC=3.01E-6 5$OC=4.53E-7 7$PC=2.87E-8 5$IPC=0.0001294 19
152SM cG M |a(K)exp=0.00051 {I13}
152SM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (weighted average from 1960De16 and 1959Wo52)
152SM cG Looked for monoenergetic positrons,
152SM2cG I|b{++}/I|g(1389)<3.4|*10{+-7} (1985Co23)
152SM G 1510.77 5 0.0456 18
152SM L 1680.55 4 1-
152SM E 0.171 20 6.78 7 0.171 20
152SMS E CK=0.7906 2$CL=0.1608 2$CM+=0.04853 6
152SM G 388.3 5 0.0008 3
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 594.7 4 0.0024 7
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 597.50 14 0.0049 7
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 639.15 14 0.0036 7
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 716.84 21 0.0084 13
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SM G 870.14 5 0.633 15
152SM G 995.84 5 0.460 20
152SM G 1558.74 6 0.057 2
152SM G 1680.62 10 0.039 2