152SM 152EU EC DECAY (13.517 Y) 13NDS 201311
152SM H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
152SM c ce: 1991Go22, 1990Ka35, 1988KaZF, 1987BaYQ, 1985Co08,
152SM2c 1983KaZJ, 1982TrZV, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1970SpZW, 1968Bo38,
152SM3c 1967Ma29, 1966He02; other: 1990Ka43, 1983Ha34
152SM c |g|g: 1981Is12, 1980Sh15, 1972Bb05, 1971Ba54, 1971Ba63,
152SM2c 1971Ha06, 1970Ka43, 1970Ri19
152SM c |g|g(t): 1993Se08 (centroid shift), 1988Ka21, 1972El20,
152SM2c 1968Ku03, 1966Mc07, 1963Fo02, 1962Ba38, 1955Su64
152SM c |g|g(|q): 1982La26 (evaluation of E0+M1+E2 measurements
152SM2c to 1980); others: 1973Ka05, 1971Ba54, 1971Ho08, 1971La11,
152SM2c 1971Ru05, 1970Ba32, 1970He29, 1970RaZF, 1970Ru09, 1969Aq01
152SM c |g|g(|q,H): 1971Do17, 1962Ba38
152SM c |g(|q,H,T): 1985KrZU, 1975Ba69; other: 1983Bl07
152SM c |g|g(|q,H,t): 1992De29
152SM c |b{++}: 1977MiZV, 1972Sv02; others: 1962Pe05, 1959An31,
152SMxc 1958Al99
152SM c |e: 1976ScZS, 1975Da13
152SM c Monoenergetic e+: 1972Sv02; others: 1965Pe12, 1964Sh15,
152SM2c 1962Pe05, 1960Va21
152SM cE (|eK(exp)/|e)av=0.80 {I3} (1976ScZS)
152SM cE I(K|a| x ray)/decay=0.591 {I12}, I(K|b| x ray)/decay=0.149
152SMxcE {I3} (1979De36)
152SM cE TI From intensity balance in decay scheme, unless otherwise
152SM2cE noted
152SM cE IB,IE From I|e+I|b{++} and theoretical |e/|b{++} ratios, unless
152SM2cE otherwise noted
152SM cG $All unplaced |g's from 13-y {+152}Eu decay are listed in this dataset.
152SM2cG some of these May belong in Gd following decay of the |b{+-} branch
152SM cG |a(K)exp have been calculated by the evaluator from I(ce(K))
152SM2cG (weighted average of references given) and the adopted I|g. The
152SM3cG I(ce(K)) have been normalized to the 344.2780|g in {+152}Gd,
152SM4cG |a(K)(344|g,E2)=0.03103. The experimental |a ratios given are also
152SM5cG weighted averages of the references cited.
152SM cG K|a| x ray=224 {I34}, K|b| x ray=51.6 {I20} (relative to
152SM2cG I(344|g, {+152}Gd)=100) (1993Ka30)
152SM cG E$Weighted average of values of 2007Ku20, 1990Me15, and 1990St02,
152SM2cG except where noted otherwise. In particular, values from 2000He14 are
152SM3cG adopted wherever available. These authors give recommended values,
152SM4cG based on E|g=411.80205 (17) for the {+198}Au transition, from a
152SM5cG reanalysis of data of 1992Le19 and 1986Wa33. transitions seen only by
152SM6cG 2007Ku20 are noted. Based on extensive coincidence studies, these
152SM7cG authors report several weak transitions and also resolve for the first
152SM8cG time the 444 and 719 |g doublets. 2004Ca04 also report some of the
152SM9cG weak transitions, and inclusion of values from these authors is noted.
152SMacG For the data of 1990Me15, |a comparison of the values with those from
152SMbcG other works and from
152SMCCG ENERGY LEVEL DIFFERENCES, AND THE OBSERVATION OF SOME INTERNAL
152SMDCG INCONSISTENCIES, SUGGEST THAT IN SOME CASES THE STATED
152SMECG UNCERTAINTIES ARE TOO SMALL. THE EVALUATOR HAS ASSIGNED A MINIMUM
152SMFCG UNCERTAINTY OF 50 EV TO THE DATA FROM THIS REFERENCE
152SM cG RI$Values are weighted averages of data of 2007Ku20, 2004Ca04,
152SM2cG 1998Hw07, 1993Ka30, 1992Ya12, 1990Me15, 1990St02, 1989Da12, 1986Me10,
152SM3cG 1984Iw03, 1980Sh15, 1979De21, 1977Ge12, 1975LeZH, 1972Bb05, 1971Ba63,
152SM4cG 1970No06, 1970Ri19, and 1969Va09 normalized to I|g=100 for the 344|g in
152SM5cG Gd. Some of the values adopted here differ from those of 2004VaZW, an
152SM6cG evaluation of data published prior to 2004. Some of these differences
152SM7cG are a result of inclusion here of the new work, 2007Ku20, and one older
152SM8cG reference, 1975LeZH. Another difference is one of policy. In 2004VaZW,
152SM9cG the uncertainties in the work of 1998Hw07 were increased by a factor of
152SMacG two. This was not done in the present evaluation.
152SMCCG ALSO, IN THE PRESENT EVALUATION, FOR THE DATA FROM 1990ME15,
152SMDCG AN UNCERTAINTY OF 2% HAS BEEN ADDED IN QUADRATURE TO TAKE INTO
152SMECG ACCOUNT THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION. INTENSITIES
152SMFCG FOR SOME WEAK TRANSITIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY 2004CA04, AND THESE
152SMGCG ARE NOTED. SOME ADDITIONAL WEAK TRANSITIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED
152SMHCG BY 1989GH02. THESE HAVE BEEN LOOKED FOR BUT NOT CONFIRMED BY
152SMICG 1993KA30, EXCEPT FOR THE THE 137.56G FROM THE 1372 LEVEL WHICH
152SMJCG HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY 2007KU20. TRANSITIONS NOTED AS BEING
152SMKCG EXCLUDED IN INDIVIDUAL CASES ARE OUTLIERS AS DETERMINED FROM
152SMLCG ^CHAUVENET'S CRITERION
152SM cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Mult measurements from this decay are given
152SM2cG in comments. The |a(K)exp values are from the ce data of the references
152SM3cG as noted, using the adopted I|g values, normalized to |a(K)=0.03103 for
152SM4cG the 344 E2 transition in Gd
152SM cG E(A),RI(A),M(A)$The 963|g-964|g doublet is placed from the 963 and 1085
152SM2cG levels, respectively. The doublet has been resolved by 2007Ku20,
152SM3cG 1972Bb05, and 1971Ba63 with I|g(963|g)=0.528~{I23} and
152SM4cG I|g(964|g)/I|g(doublet)=0.9904~{I6}. The value given for I|g(964|g) is
152SM5cG |a weighted average of all values with this correction factor applied
152SM6cG to the unresolved data. Since 99% of the intensity belongs with the
152SM7cG 1085 level, the evaluator assumes that the measured energies can be
152SM8cG assigned to this placement. The evaluator adopts E|g=964.057~{I5} from
152SM9cG 1986Wa33. From a measurement of ce energies, 1984Bu35 determine
152SMacG E(964|g)-E|g(963|g)=0.690~{I5}, which then gives
152SMbcG E|g(963|g)=963.367~{I5}.
152SMCCG EKC=0.00245 6 (1990KA35, 1985CO08, 1981KA40, 1979DE22, 1967MA29),
152SMDCG FOR THE DOUBLET, ALONG WITH MR=-9.3 6 IS CONSISTENT ONLY WITH
152SMECG MULT=M1+E2 FOR THE STRONG COMPONENT (KC=0.00233 11 FOR E2). NO
152SMFCG ASSIGNMENT CAN be MADE FOR THE WEAK COMPONENT BASED JUST ON THE CE
152SMGCG DATA BUT IF ONE ASSUMES MULT(963G)=E1, BASED ON ITS PLACEMENT,
152SMHCG THEN ONE GETS EKC=0.00246 6 FOR THE 964G, CONSISTENT WITH MULT=E2.
152SMICG THERE SEEMS TO be NO NEED TO INVOKE AN E0 COMPONENT FOR THE 964G
152SMJCG AS HAS BEEN SUGGESTED BY SOME AUTHORS
152SM cG E(B),RI(B),M(B)$The 444|g is a doublet placed from the 810 and 1530
152SM2cG levels. The doublet has been resolved by 2007Ku20, 1972Bb05, 1971Ba63,
152SM3cG 1970Ri19, and 1969Va09 with I|g(from 810)=1.12~{I4} and I|g(from
152SM4cG 1530)/I|g(doublet)=0.906~{I4}. The value adopted for the 1530 level is
152SM5cG a weighted average of all data with this correction factor applied to
152SM6cG the unresolved data. The value of 1970No06 has been excluded. Since 91%
152SM7cG of the intensity belongs with the 1530 level, the evaluator assumes
152SM8cG that the measured energies can be assigned to this placement. The
152SM9cG evaluator adopts E|g from 1992Le19. The value given for the 810 level
152SMacG is from 2007Ku20.
152SMCCG FROM EKC=0.00596 16 (1991GO22, 1985CO08, 1979DE22) FOR THE DOUBLET,
152SMDCG WITH KC(THEORY)=0.00485 (E1) AND 0.0144 (E2), THE
152SMECG STRONG COMPONENT MUST be E1 AND THE WEAK COMPONENT MAINLY E2.
152SMFCG PLACEMENT OF THE WEAK COMPONENT IN THE DECAY SCHEME REQUIRES DJ=2
152SM cG RI(D)$The 919|g is placed from the 1041 and 1730 levels. The doublet
152SM2cG has been resolved by 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04 from which a weighted
152SM3cG average of I|g=0.0244~{I14} is obtained for the weak component from the
152SM4cG 1730 level. The values for the doublet obtained by the other authors
152SM5cG are corrected for this component and give |a weighted average of
152SM6cG 1.574~{I16} for the component from the 1041 level
152SM cG E(E),RI(E),M(E)$The 719|g is placed from the 1086 and 1530 levels.
152SM2cG 2007Ku20 resolve the components and show that 85% of the intensity
152SM3cG belongs with the 1086 level. The evaluator assumes that the accurate
152SM4cG E|g value from 1992Le19 can be assigned to this placement. the doublet
152SM5cG is not resolved in the other works. |a(K)exp=0.0038~{I7} (1983KaZJ)
152SM6cG for the doublet is consistent with mult=E2 for placement from the 1086
152SM7cG level and mult=E1 for placement from the 1530 level. These mults are
152SM8cG expected based on the ADOPTED J{+|p} values
152SM cG E(H)$From 2000He14
152SM cG E(P),RI(P)$This unplaced transition is from 1993Ka30
152SM cG E(T),RI(T)$This unplaced transition is from 1990Me15
152SM cG E(S)$Weighted average from 1992Le19 and 1986Wa33. Not included in
152SM2cG 2000He14
152SM cG E(U),RI(U)$The 285|g is doubly placed, from the 1372 and 1579 levels.
152SM2cG E|g and I|g for placement from the 1372 level are from 2007Ku20 and for
152SM3cG the 1579 level are weighted averages from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04. The
152SM4cG transitions are not resolved in other works
152SM cG E(V)$From 1986Wa33
152SM cG E(W),RI(W)$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04
152SM cG E(X)$Weighted average from 2007Ku20, 2004Ca04, and 1990Me15
152SM cG E(Y),RI(Y)$The 674|g is placed from the 1041 level in Sm and from the
152SM2cG 1606 level in Gd with I|g(doublet)=0.706~{I14}. the component in Sm is
152SM3cG resolved by 2007Ku20 with E|g=674.64~{I14} and I|g=0.656~{I21}. From
152SM4cG branching in Tb |e decay, the component in Gd can be deduced as
152SM5cG 0.080~{I3} which, combined with I|g for the doublet, gives
152SM6cG I|g=0.628~{I15} for the component in Sm. The value adopted is a
152SM7cG weighted average of these two determinations
152SM cG E(Z),RI(Z)$From 2007Ku20
152SM cL
152SM cL $Additional possible levels have been proposed at 1436.65 and 1681.36
152SM2cL keV (1990St02,1993Ka30). However, 1992Ya12 have searched for the |g's
152SM3cL reported as depopulating these levels and set an upper limit for their
152SM4cL intensity which is considerably lower than the intensity reported by
152SM5cL 1990St02 and 1993Ka30. EXCEPT FOR the 1315|g proposed from the 1681
152SM6cL level, these transitions have also not been seen by 2007Ku20. The 1681
152SM7cL level, deexcited by |a 1315|g is adopted here
152SM cL E$From a least-squares fit to the E|g data
152SM cL J From adopted levels
152EU P 0.0 3- 13.517 Y 14 1874.6 7
152SM N 0.3689 14 0.3689 14 0.7208 13 1.3873
152SM PN 3
152SM cN NR,BR$The absolute intensity of the 1408|g has been evaluated to be
152SM2cN 20.85% 9 (2007BeZP). Normalization of the photon intensities to
152SM3cN I|g(344|g in Gd)=100 gives I|g(1408|g)=78.41~{I10} and |S\ I(|g+ce)(to
152SM4cN Gd g.s.)=105.02~{I18}. From these data one gets branching (|b-)=27.92
152SM5cN 13 and thus branching (|e)=72.08 13.
152SM G 166.91 25 0.008 3
152SM2 G FLAG=P$
152SM G 175.18 0.015 4
152SM2 G FLAG=P$
152SM G 202.74 13 0.019 4
152SM cG E,RI$Weighted average from 1990Me15 and 1990St02. 1992Ya12 report
152SM2cG I|g<0.005
152SM G 379.36 18 0.0031 8
152SM2 G FLAG=T$
152SM G 389.07 11 0.013 5
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.014~{I4}. Not seen by
152SM2cG 1992Ya12, I|g<0.005
152SM G 395.75 19 0.03 1
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.02~{I1}. Not seen by
152SM2cG 1992Ya12, I|g<0.005
152SM G 406.74 15 0.0031 8
152SM2 G FLAG=T$
152SM G 441.00
152SM2 G FLAG=P$
152SM G 536.23
152SM2 G FLAG=P$
152SM G 595.61 12 0.12 4
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.012~{I6}. Not seen by
152SM2cG 1992Ya12, I|g<0.006
152SM G 696.87 19 0.06 3
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.011~{I4}. Not seen by
152SM2cG 1992Ya12, I|g<0.007
152SM G 896.59 9 0.252 8
152SM cG E from 1990St02
152SM cG RI weighted average of 1990St02 and 1993Ka30
152SM G 1001.1 3 0.017 3
152SM cG E$From 1990Me15$
152SM cG RI$Weighted average from 1990Me15 and 1993Ka30
152SM G 1084 1 0.92 3
152SM2 G FLAG=T$
152SM G 1139 1 0.0047 3
152SM cG E$From 1990Me15$
152SM cG RI weighted average of 1990Me15 and 1993Ka30
152SM G 1485.9 3 0.021 9
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. 1993Ka30 report I|g=0.011~{I4}. Not seen by
152SM2cG 1992Ya12, I|g<0.005
152SM G 1674.31 6 0.023 3
152SM2 G FLAG=T$
152SM G 1698.1 4 0.022 7
152SM cG E,RI$From 1990St02. Not seen by 1992Ya12, I|g<0.005
152SM L 0.0 0+ STABLE
152SM L 121.7818 3 2+ 1.396 NS 8
152SM cL T from 1988Ka21. Others: 1.40 ns {I2} (1992De29), 1.35 ns {I5}
152SM2cL (1972El20), 1.41 ns {I4} (1968Ku03), 1.36 ns {I6} (1966Mc07), 1.37 ns
152SM3cL {I4} (1963Fo02), 1,42 ns {I4} (1962Ba38), 1.40 ns {I10} (1955Su64)
152SM cL g-factor: 0.40 {I3} (1992De29). Others: 0.30 {I3} (1971Do17),
152SM2cL 0.35 {I3} (1962Ba38)
152SM E 0.023 7 1.6 5 11.8 2 1.6 5
152SMS E EAV=338.25 31$CK=0.8282$CL=0.1220$CM+=0.03521
152SM cE E E|b+=729.0 {I15} (1977MiZV), 727 {I3} (1972Sv02)
152SM cE IB,IE from I|b{++}=0.011 % 2 per parent decay (1972Sv02) based on
152SM2cE I|b{++}/I(ce(K) 1408|g)=1.08 {I20}
152SM G 121.7817 3 107.3 4 E2 1.155
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G KC=0.678 10$LC=0.370 6$MC=0.0853 12$NC+=0.0212 3
152SMS G NC=0.0187 3$OC=0.00239 4$PC=3.00E-5 5
152SM cG RI$Value of 1969Va09 is excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.661~{I10} (1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1967Ma29).
152SM2cG K/L=1.73~{I3} (1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1978Ar24, 1957Ke08).
152SM3cG L2/L1=2.58~{I12} (1981Ka40), 2.43~{I24} (1978Ar24), 2.30~{I26}
152SM4cG (1967Ma29), 2.297~{I13} (1970SpZW), 2.22~{I4} (1957Ke08).
152SM5cG L3/L1=2.66~{I13} (1981Ka40), 2.45~{I24} (1978Ar24), 2.260~{I15}
152SM6cG (1970SpZW), 2.27~{I26} (1967Ma29), 2.16~{I5} (1957Ke08). The E2 theory
152SM7cG values are 2.439 and 2.415 for L2/L1 and L3/L1, respectively, so the
152SM8cG values of 1970SpZW and 1957Ke08 are 9.0% 17 and 5.9% 6 low for L2/L1,
152SM9cG and 6.4% 6 and 10.0% 21 low for L3/L1, respectively. The experimental
152SMacG L2/L3 values agree well with theory, 1.016~{I5} for 1970SpZW and
152SMbcG 1.028~{I24} for 1957Ke08 compared with 1.010 for E2 theory.
152SMCCG L/M=4.34 7 (1960MU05, 1957KE08). M2/M1=2.72 5 (1970SPZW), 3.4 1
152SMDCG (1957KE08). M3/M1=2.76 10 (1970SPZW), 3.3 2 (1957KE08). THE E2
152SMECG THEORY VALUES ARE 2.72 AND 2.76, RESPECTIVELY
152SM L 366.4795 9 4+ 60 PS 5
152SM cL T from 1993Se08. Other: 42 ps {I18} (1972El20)
152SM cL J |g|g(|q) data (1970He29,1973Ka05) are consistent with
152SM2cL J=4 but not with J=0,1,3; possible J=2 is ruled out by ce data
152SM E 0.0026 1 0.85 4 11.92 2 0.85 4
152SMS E EAV=230.84 31$CK=0.8369$CL=0.1242$CM+=0.03589
152SM cE E E|b+=483 {I6} (1977MiZV), 479 {I10} (1972Sv02)
152SM cE IB,IE from I|b{++}(to 121 level)/I|b{++}(to 366 level)=3.9 {I7}
152SMxcE (1972Sv02)
152SM G 244.6974 8 28.39 10 E2 0.1073
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G KC=0.0808 12$LC=0.0207 3$MC=0.00465 7$NC+=0.001176 17
152SMS G NC=0.001032 15$OC=0.0001394 20$PC=4.18E-6 6
152SM cG RI$Values of 1993Ka30, 1990St02, and 1970No06 are excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0809~{I16}, K/L=3.91~{I9} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22,
152SM2cG 1978Ar24, 1967Ma29). |a(L)exp=0.0210~{I9} (1991Go22).
152SM3cG |a(M)exp=0.00466~{I14} (1983KaZJ). L2/L1=0.78~{I3} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40,
152SM4cG 1967Ma29). L3/L1=0.61~{I3} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40). Other:
152SM5cG L3/L1=0.39~{I4} of 1967Ma29 is discrepant. E2 theory values are
152SM6cG |a(K)=0.0808, K/L=3.90, |a(L)=0.0207, |a(M)=0.00465, L2/L1=0.772,
152SM7cG L3/L1=0.603
152SM cG MR$From |g|g(|q), 1985KrZU report |d(M3/E2)=-0.01~{I3}
152SM L 684.69 6 0+
152SM G 562.98 14 0.076 7 E2
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SMS G CC=0.00941 14$KC=0.00779 11$LC=0.001274 18$MC=0.000278 4$NC+=7.18E-5 10
152SMS G NC=6.24E-5 9$OC=9.00E-6 13$PC=4.52E-7 7
152SM L 706.91 4 6+
152SM G 340.46 10 0.100 3 E2 0.0382
152SMS G KC=0.0302 5$LC=0.00622 9$MC=0.001379 20$NC+=0.000352 5
152SMS G NC=0.000308 5$OC=4.28E-5 6$PC=1.660E-6 24
152SM cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1977Ge12 are excluded
152SM L 810.453 4 2+ 7 PS 5
152SM cL T from 1993Se08
152SM E 1.175 15 11.463 6
152SMS E CK=0.8363$CL=0.1269$CM+=0.03681
152SM G 125.68 10 0.0193 7[E2] 1.033
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SMS G KC=0.618 9$LC=0.322 5$MC=0.0742 11$NC+=0.0184 3
152SMS G NC=0.01631 24$OC=0.00209 3$PC=2.75E-5 4
152SM G 444.01 17 1.12 4 E2 0.01772
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SMS G KC=0.01441 21$LC=0.00259 4$MC=0.000569 8$NC+=0.0001463 21
152SMS G NC=0.0001274 18$OC=1.81E-5 3$PC=8.19E-7 12
152SM G 688.670 5 3.221 19 E0+M1+E2 0.0409 13
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G KC=0.0356 11$LC=0.0051 2$
152SM cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0357~{I11} (1990Ka35, 1981Ka40, 1991Go22, 1967Ma29).
152SM2cG |a(K)(E2 theory)=0.00479, and from the evaluation of 1982La26 one has
152SM3cG |d(E2/M1)=19~{I+5-4}, which gives |a(K)(theory)=0.00480. from these
152SM4cG data one gets Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)=6.4~{I3}. |a(M)exp=0.0019~{I4}
152SM5cG (1983KaZJ). K/L=7.0~{I8} (1991Go22), other: 7.2~{I13} (1967Ma29). The
152SM6cG value of 4.0~{I4} reported by 1981Ka40 is discrepant. L/M=3.3~{I5}
152SM7cG (1991Go22), other: 3.3~{I14} (1967Ma29). I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=6.1
152SM8cG {I15}, |r=0.23 {I2} (1990Ka35);
152SM cG MR |d(E2/M1)=+19 {I+5-4} (adopted gammas (1982La26),
152SM2cG includes 1973Ka05,1971Ru05,1970RaZF). Other: +31 +|2-17 (1985KrZU)
152SM cG From (ce(K))(|g)(|q) 1973Ka05 deduce penetration parameter
152SM2cG -365|<|l|<+290 and |d(E0/E2)=2.47 {I31}
152SM G 810.451 5 1.193 10 E2
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.00393 6$KC=0.00331 5$LC=0.000487 7$MC=0.0001051 15$NC+=2.74E-5 4
152SMS G NC=2.37E-5 4$OC=3.48E-6 5$PC=1.96E-7 3
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0037~{I5} (1991Go22, 1983KaZJ, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=
152SM2cG 0.00557 (M1), 0.00331 (E2) which give |d>1.2. Placement to 0+ requires
152SM3cG pure mult
152SM cG RI$The value of 1970Ri19 is excluded
152SM L 963.363 3 1- 19.9 FS 7
152SM cL T$From 2000Jo10
152SM G 841.574 5 0.630 11 E1
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.001436 21$KC=0.001234 18$LC=0.0001597 23$MC=3.39E-5 5$NC+=8.89E-6
152SMS G NC=7.68E-6 11$OC=1.147E-6 16$PC=7.12E-8 10
152SM G 963.367 7 0.528 23 [E1]
152SM3 G FLAG=A
152SMS G CC=0.001107 16$KC=0.000951 14$LC=0.0001225 18$MC=2.60E-5 4$NC+=6.82E-6
152SMS G NC=5.88E-6 9$OC=8.81E-7 13$PC=5.50E-8 8
152SM L 1022.969 5 4+
152SM E 0.233 4 11.963 8
152SMS E CK=0.8335$CL=0.1290$CM+=0.03751
152SM G 212.43 11 0.0780 20 E2 0.1706
152SMS G KC=0.1246 18$LC=0.0359 5$MC=0.00811 12$NC+=0.00204 3
152SMS G NC=0.00179 3$OC=0.000239 4$PC=6.26E-6 9
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990St02. The value of
152SM2cG 212.569~{I15} reported by 1990Me15 is not consistent with the level
152SM3cG energy difference of 212.516~{I6}
152SM G 316.13 13 0.0378 19(E2) 0.0478
152SM2 G FLAG=X$
152SMS G KC=0.0375 6$LC=0.00806 12$MC=0.00179 3$NC+=0.000457 7
152SMS G NC=0.000399 6$OC=5.52E-5 8$PC=2.03E-6 3
152SM cG RI$Exclude 1990Me15
152SM G 656.489 5 0.542 8 E0+M1+E2 0.0568 20
152SMS G KC=0.0491 15$LC=0.0070 2$
152SM2 G FLAG=V$
152SM cG RI$Exclude 1970Ri19
152SM cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.0491~{I15} (1991|g022, 1990Ka35, 1985Co08, 1982TrZV,
152SM2cG 1979De22, 1967Ma29). The value for 1991Go22 is deduced by the evaluator
152SM3cG from the authors' unresolved ce intensity for ce(K)(656|g)+ ce(L)(615
152SM4cG E0 in Gd). K/L=4.5~{I+29-15} (1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.00931 (M1)
152SM5cG and 0.00536 (E2), and from the evaluation of 1982La26 one has
152SM6cG |d=+2.1~{I3}, which gives |a(K)(M1+E2 theory)=0.00611~{I18}. From these
152SM7cG data one gets Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)= 8.0~{I3} and
152SM8cG Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(M1+E2)=7.0~{I3}
152SM G 901.19 5 0.321 9 E2
152SMS G CC=0.00311 5$KC=0.00263 4$LC=0.000378 6$MC=8.13E-5 12$NC+=2.12E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.83E-5 3$OC=2.71E-6 4$PC=1.558E-7 22
152SM L 1041.1217 23 3- 5 PS LT
152SM cL T from 1993Se08
152SM E 0.067 7 12.49 5
152SMS E CK=0.8332$CL=0.1292$CM+=0.03759
152SM G 674.64 14 0.636 12 E1
152SM2 G FLAG=Y$
152SMS G CC=0.00225 4$KC=0.00193 3$LC=0.000252 4$MC=5.36E-5 8$NC+=1.403E-5 20
152SMS G NC=1.211E-5 17$OC=1.81E-6 3$PC=1.107E-7 16
152SM cG MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.03~{I6} (1971Ba54)
152SM G 919.337 4 1.574 16 E1
152SM2 G FLAG=DH$
152SMS G CC=0.001210 17$KC=0.001040 15$LC=0.0001341 19$MC=2.85E-5 4$NC+=7.47E-6
152SMS G NC=6.44E-6 9$OC=9.64E-7 14$PC=6.01E-8 9
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00127~{I19} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.00104 (E1), 0.0104
152SM2cG (M2).
152SM cG MR$|d(M2/E1)=-0.09~{I12} (1985KrZU), 0.16~{I+5-10} from |a(K)exp, <0.07
152SM2cG from RUL (B(M2)(W.u.)<1)
152SM L 1082.816 24 0+
152SM E 0.0038 24 13.7 3
152SMS E CK=0.8324$CL=0.1298$CM+=0.03778
152SM G 118.97 15 0.0020 4
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$FL=963.363$
152SM cG E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment. The
152SM2cG adjustment gives E|g=119.48~{I3}
152SM G 272.41 9 0.0024 6
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 961.08 4 0.030 8
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM L 1085.8408 21 2+ 4 PS LT
152SM cL T from 1993Se08
152SM E 21.50 11 9.928 3
152SMS E CK=0.8324$CL=0.1298$CM+=0.03780
152SM cE |e-branch 38 {I9} % L=1 (1975Ba69)
152SM G 275.42 4 0.130 3 M1 0.1015
152SMS G KC=0.0863 12$LC=0.01198 17$MC=0.00257 4$NC+=0.000676 10
152SMS G NC=0.000583 9$OC=8.75E-5 13$PC=5.46E-6 8
152SM cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1977Ge12 are excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.106~{I19} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.0862 (M1)
152SM G 401.29 9 0.0024016
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 719.346 7 0.94 3 (E2)
152SM2 G FLAG=E$
152SMS G CC=0.00517 8$KC=0.00433 6$LC=0.000657 10$MC=0.0001420 20$NC+=3.69E-5 6
152SMS G NC=3.20E-5 5$OC=4.68E-6 7$PC=2.55E-7 4
152SM G 964.057 5 54.57 13 M1+E2 -9.3 6
152SM2 G FLAG=A$
152SMS G CC=0.00271 4$KC=0.00229 4$LC=0.000325 5$MC=6.98E-5 10$NC+=1.82E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.577E-5 23$OC=2.33E-6 4$PC=1.362E-7 20
152SM cG MR weighted average of -8.0 {I6} (1985KrZU) and -9.6 {I3}
152SM2cG (1982La26). Other: -7.5 {I+5-25} (1992De29)
152SM G 1085.837 10 38.04 10 E2
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.00209 3$KC=0.001779 25$LC=0.000247 4$MC=5.30E-5 8$NC+=1.387E-5 20
152SMS G NC=1.199E-5 17$OC=1.780E-6 25$PC=1.058E-7 15
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00202~{I5} 91985co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1967Ma29).
152SM2cG |a(L+...)exp=0.000281~{I17} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.00277 (M1),
152SM3cG 0.00178 (E2). |a(L)+(theory)=0.000467 (M1), 0.000315 (E2). from
152SM4cG |a(K)exp, |d=2.1~{I+6-3}, and from |a(L+...)exp, no M1 component is
152SM5cG required. placement in the decay scheme is to the 0+ g.s., so pure
152SM6cG mult is required. Note that 1991Go22 report |a(K)exp=0.00180~{I8},
152SM7cG consistent with mult=E2; however, 1981Ka40 report |a(K)exp=0.00212~{I8}
152SM L 1221.67 4 5-
152SM G 514.78 6 0.0016 3
152SM2 G FLAG=W
152SM G 855.21 7 0.0074 5
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM L 1233.8626 17 3+ 6 PS LT
152SM cL T from 1993Se08
152SM E 17.09 8 9.837 3
152SMS E CK=0.8288$CL=0.13250 2$CM+=0.038718 6
152SM cE IE |eK/|e=0.88 {I10} (1975Da13)
152SM G 148.00 5 0.077 4 M1+E2 +1.0 6 0.569 16
152SMS G KC=0.42 5$LC=0.11 5$MC=0.025 11$NC+=0.006 3
152SMS G NC=0.0056 24$OC=0.0008 3$PC=2.4E-5 7
152SM cG RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 0.18~{I2} (1993Ka30), 0.15~{I3} (1990Me15),
152SM2cG 0.17~{I2} (1990St02), 0.12~{I1} (1980Sh15),|?0.04 (1975LeZH), |<0.02
152SM3cG (1972Bb05), 0.06~{I2} (1971Ba63)
152SM cG M$The adopted T{-1/2}=0.76~ps~{I14} for the 1234 level, and
152SM2cG |d(Q/D)=1.0~{I6} rule out mult=E1+M2
152SM cG MR$From linear polarization (2002Za07)
152SM G 210.95 14 0.0143 6
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 423.45 4 0.0112 8 [M1,E2] 0.027 7
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SMS G KC=0.022 6$LC=0.0034 5$MC=0.00074 8$NC+=0.000193 24
152SMS G NC=0.000167 20$OC=2.4E-5 4$PC=1.3E-6 5
152SM G 867.380 3 15.90 9 M1+E2 -6.2 5
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.00343 5$KC=0.00290 4$LC=0.000419 6$MC=9.01E-5 13$NC+=2.35E-5 4
152SMS G NC=2.03E-5 3$OC=3.00E-6 5$PC=1.719E-7 25
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00302~{I20} (1985Co08, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). Other: the
152SM2cG value of 0.00441~{I25} from 1981Ka40 seems discrepant.
152SM3cG |a(L)exp=0.040~{I3} (1991Go22, 1982TrZV, 1967Ma29).
152SM4cG |a(K)(theory)=0.00473 (M1), 0.00285 (E2) and |a(L)(theory)=0.000632
152SM5cG (M1), 0.000414 (E2). From |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp one gets |d>2.0 and
152SM6cG >3.6, respectively
152SM cG MR$Unweighted average of -6.5~{I3} (1982La26), -6.9~{I+7-8} (1985KrZU)
152SM2cG -5.3~{I4} (2008ZaZY)
152SM cG MR from 1982La26. Other: -6.9 {I+7-8} (1985KrZU)
152SM G 1112.076 3 51.40 23 M1+E2 -8.7 6
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.00201 3$KC=0.001707 24$LC=0.000236 4$MC=5.06E-5 8$NC+=1.375E-5 20
152SMS G NC=1.144E-5 16$OC=1.701E-6 24$PC=1.017E-7 15$IPC=5.03E-7 7
152SM cG RI$The value of 1998Hw07 is excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00184~{I12} (1985Co08, 1981Ka40, 1979De22, 1967Ma29).
152SM2cG |a(L)exp=0.000226~{I12} (1991Go22). Other: 0.00035~{I5} (1982TrZV).
152SM3cG |a(K)(theory)=0.00262 (M1), 0.00170 (E2) and |a(L)(theory)=0.000348
152SM4cG (M1), 0.000235 (E2). |a(K)exp gives |d>1.6 and |a(L)exp gives |d>6.0
152SM cG MR from 1982La26. Others: -34 {I+6-8} (1992De29), -8.1 {I+6-7}
152SMxcG (1985KrZU)
152SM L 1292.753 8 2+
152SM E 0.625 8 11.184 6
152SMS E CK=0.8268$CL=0.13399 2$CM+=0.039227 7
152SM G 207.03 23 0.0043 9
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 209.97 3 0.0162 26
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04
152SM cG RI$The 209|g is a triplet with I|g=0.0209~{I20}. 2004Ca04 determine
152SM2cG I|g=0.0045~{I15} for placement from the 1643 level in Gd, and
152SM3cG 0.0162~{I26} for placement from the 1293 level in Sm. A third placement
152SM4cG is from the 1318 level in Gd, whose intensity from branching in Tb |e
152SM5cG decay is 0.0099~{I4}. The sum of these components is 0.0213~{I30},
152SM6cG consistent with the value measured for the triplet
152SM cG RI$Unweighted average of 0.0241~{I10} (2007Ku20) and 0.0162~{I26}
152SM2cG (2004Ca04). the transition is a doublet and is not resolved in the
152SM3cG other works
152SM G 251.633 9 0.252 7 E1+M2 0.24 +4-6 0.055 14
152SMS G KC=0.046 12$LC=0.0074 21$MC=0.0016 5$NC+=0.00043 12
152SMS G NC=0.00037 11$OC=5.4E-5 15$PC=3.1E-6 9
152SM2 G FLAG=V$
152SM cG RI$The value of 1975LeZH is excluded
152SM cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.045~{I10} (1991Go22). |a(K)(theory)=0.0197 (E1), 0.0742
152SM2cG (E2), 0.500 (M2). This gives mult=E1+M2 with |d=0.24~{I+4-6}
152SM G 269.84 6 0.0295 19[E2] 0.0784
152SMS G KC=0.0601 9$LC=0.01432 20$MC=0.00321 5$NC+=0.000812 12
152SMS G NC=0.000712 10$OC=9.71E-5 14$PC=3.17E-6 5
152SM cG RI$The value of 1972Bb05 is excluded
152SM G 329.41 5 0.456 9[E1] 0.01163
152SMS G KC=0.00993 14$LC=0.001342 19$MC=0.000286 4$NC+=7.45E-5 11
152SMS G NC=6.45E-5 9$OC=9.49E-6 14$PC=5.50E-7 8
152SM cG RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20, 1990Me15, and 1972Bb05. The other
152SM2cG works May include the 330.58|g from the 1372 level
152SM G 482.33 5 0.093 3 E0+M1+E2 0.062 12
152SMS G KC=0.054 12$LC=0.0077 17$
152SM cG E,RI$The 482|g is placed from the 1293 level in Sm and from the 1606
152SM2cG level in Gd. 2007Ku20 resolve the Sm component which constitutes 92% of
152SM3cG the total intensity. The evaluator assumes that the measured energy can
152SM4cG be assigned to this placement
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.054~{I12} (1991Go22, 1990Ka35, 1982TrZV). The value for
152SM2cG 1991Go22 is deduced by the evaluator from the authors' unresolved ce
152SM3cG intensity for Ice(K)(482|g)+Ice(L)(444|g doublet). |a(K)(theory)=0.0201
152SM4cG for mult=M1 and 0.0116 for E2 give Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(E2)=3.6~{I10} for
152SM5cG mult=E0+E2, and Ice(K)(E0)/Ice(K)(M1)=1.7~{I6} for mult=E0+M1
152SM G 608.06 15 0.0010 3
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 926.31 5 1.024 12[E2]
152SMS G CC=0.00293 4$KC=0.00248 4$LC=0.000354 5$MC=7.62E-5 11$NC+=1.99E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.720E-5 24$OC=2.54E-6 4$PC=1.470E-7 21
152SM G 1170.97 9 0.140 6[M1,E2]
152SMS G CC=0.0023 5$KC=0.0019 4$LC=0.00026 5$MC=5.5E-5 11$NC+=1.8E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.25E-5 24$OC=1.9E-6 4$PC=1.2E-7 3$IPC=3.14E-6 11
152SM G 1292.78 5 0.378 10[E2]
152SMS G CC=0.001491 21$KC=0.001255 18$LC=0.0001703 24$MC=3.64E-5 5$NC+=2.87E-5
152SMS G NC=8.24E-6 12$OC=1.229E-6 18$PC=7.48E-8 11$IPC=1.92E-5 3
152SM L 1371.721 14 4+
152SM E 0.853 17 10.912 9
152SMS E CK=0.8233$CL=0.13659 3$CM+=0.04012 1
152SM G 137.56 22 0.0028 5
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 150.13 8 0.0034 3
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 285.98 18 0.037 6[E2] 0.0653
152SM2 G FLAG=U$
152SMS G KC=0.0505 8$LC=0.01156 17$MC=0.00258 4$NC+=0.000656 10
152SMS G NC=0.000574 9$OC=7.87E-5 12$PC=2.69E-6 4
152SM G 330.58 8 0.035 4[E1] 0.01154
152SMS G KC=0.00985 14$LC=0.001331 19$MC=0.000284 4$NC+=7.39E-5 11
152SMS G NC=6.39E-5 9$OC=9.41E-6 14$PC=5.45E-7 8
152SM cG RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20, 1990Me15, and 1972Bb05. The value of
152SM2cG 0.28~{I4} given in 1990Me15 is assumed by the evaluator to be |a
152SM3cG mistake and is taken as 0.028~{I4}
152SM G 348.752 15 0.0064 6
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 561.26 17 0.0053 9[E2]
152SMS G CC=0.00949 14$KC=0.00785 11$LC=0.001285 18$MC=0.000280 4$NC+=7.24E-5 11
152SMS G NC=6.29E-5 9$OC=9.07E-6 13$PC=4.56E-7 7
152SM G 664.77 5 0.0373 19[E2]
152SMS G CC=0.00623 9$KC=0.00520 8$LC=0.000807 12$MC=0.0001749 25$NC+=4.54E-5 7
152SMS G NC=3.94E-5 6$OC=5.73E-6 8$PC=3.05E-7 5
152SM cG RI$Values of 1990Me15 and 1972Bb05 are excluded
152SM G 1005.27 5 2.48 4 M1+E2 -3.1 +2-3
152SMS G CC=0.00259 5$KC=0.00220 4$LC=0.000308 5$MC=6.60E-5 11$NC+=1.73E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.492E-5 24$OC=2.22E-6 4$PC=1.316E-7 22
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0028~{I3} (1990Ka35, 1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.00333
152SM2cG (M1), 0.00208 (E2)
152SM cG MR from 1982La26. Other: -3.9 {I25} (1985KrZU)
152SM G 1249.94 5 0.703 9 E2
152SMS G CC=0.001586 23$KC=0.001341 19$LC=0.000183 3$MC=3.91E-5 6$NC+=2.25E-5 4
152SMS G NC=8.84E-6 13$OC=1.318E-6 19$PC=7.99E-8 12$IPC=1.222E-5 18
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0017~{I6} (1967La13)
152SM cG MR +0.04 {I9} (1985KrZU)
152SM L 1529.8019 17 2-
152SM cL T$From the intensity of the K-positon line to that of the 1408|g,
152SM2cL 1972Sv02 deduce T{-1/2}=27~fs. For data and calculations see authors'
152SM3cL paper. this value of T{-1/2} gives B(M2)(W.u.)|?10 for the 1408|g
152SM4cL and|?900 for the 444|g, both much larger than the RUL limit of <1.
152SM5cL |d(1408|g) is an average from eight authors, so the discrepancy May lie
152SM6cL with the value of T{-1/2}. This value of T{-1/2} is not ADOPTED
152SM E 24.78 11 9.086 3
152SMS E CK=0.81064 9$CL=0.14600 7$CM+=0.04337 3
152SM cE IE |eK/|e=0.79 {I2} (1962Lu02), 0.76 {I9} (1975Da13)
152SM G 237.10 3 0.0238 7
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 295.9387 17 1.656 15 E1 0.01523
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G KC=0.01299 19$LC=0.001765 25$MC=0.000377 6$NC+=9.79E-5 14
152SMS G NC=8.48E-5 12$OC=1.244E-5 18$PC=7.13E-7 10
152SM cG RI$The value of 0.72~{I5} given in 1990St02 is probably a misprint.
152SM2cG the evaluator assumes that the value should be 1.72~{I5} and includes
152SM3cG it in the weighted average
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0108~{I8} (1991Go22, 1982TrZV, 1967Ma29). Note that the
152SM2cG reported values are all smaller than the E1 theory value of 0.0130
152SM cG MR -0.00 {I3} (1985KrZU)
152SM G 443.9606 16 10.63 3 E1+M2 +0.058 12
152SM2 G FLAG=B$
152SMS G CC=0.00598 17$KC=0.00511 14$LC=0.000688 22$MC=0.000147 5$NC+=3.83E-5 13
152SMS G NC=3.31E-5 11$OC=4.91E-6 16$PC=2.92E-7 10
152SM cG MR from 1985KrZU. Other: +0.03 {I8} (1973Ka05)
152SM G 488.6792 20 1.558 10 M1+E2 +5.6 5 0.0139221
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G KC=0.01143 17$LC=0.00195 3$MC=0.000427 6$NC+=0.0001101 16
152SMS G NC=9.57E-5 14$OC=1.371E-5 20$PC=6.59E-7 10
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0118~{I9} (1991Go22,1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.0194 (M1),
152SM2cG 0.0112 (E2)
152SM cG MR from 1970Ba32. Other: +4.5 {I+18-11} (1985KrZU)
152SM G 566.438 6 0.493 12 M1+E2 -0.74 35 0.0134 15
152SM2 G FLAG=S$
152SMS G KC=0.0114 13$LC=0.00162 13$MC=0.00035 3$NC+=9.1E-5 8
152SMS G NC=7.9E-5 6$OC=1.17E-5 10$PC=7.0E-7 9
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.010~{I5} (1967Ma29). |a(K)(theory)=0.0134 (M1), 0.00767
152SM2cG (E2)
152SM cG MR from 1985KrZU
152SM G 719.36 14 0.357 12 (E1)
152SM2 G FLAG=E$
152SMS G CC=0.00197 3$KC=0.001689 24$LC=0.000220 3$MC=4.68E-5 7$NC+=1.226E-5 18
152SMS G NC=1.058E-5 15$OC=1.578E-6 23$PC=9.71E-8 14
152SM G 1408.013 3 78.48 13 E1+M2 +0.043 3
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.000707 10$KC=0.000486 7$LC=6.18E-5 9$MC=1.311E-5 19$NC+=0.0001457
152SMS G NC=2.97E-6 5$OC=4.46E-7 7$PC=2.83E-8 4$IPC=0.0001423 20
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.000490~{I26} ( 1985Co08, 1979De22, 1967Ma29). Other: the
152SM2cG value of 0.00060~{I4} from 1981Ka40 seems discrepant. |a(K)(theory)=
152SM3cG 0.000481 (E1), 0.00347 (M2). |a(L)exp=0.000061~{I3} (1991Go22).
152SM4cG |a(L)(theory)=0.0000610 (E1), 0.000478 (M2)
152SM cG MR$An unweighted average of A{-2} and A{-4} values from |g|g(|q) data
152SM2cG of 1973Ka05, 1970Ba32, 1970He29, 1970RaZF, 1970Ru09, 1969Aq01, 1969La09
152SM3cG and 1992De29 give |d=+0.043~{I3}
152SM cG Monoenergetic e+ observed, for data see 1972Sv02
152SM L 1579.427 8 3-
152SM E 2.082 12 10.007 4
152SMS E CK=0.8033 2$CL=0.1515 1$CM+=0.04526 4
152SM G 207.64 11 0.0276 10[E1] 0.0382
152SMS G KC=0.0325 5$LC=0.00450 7$MC=0.000961 14$NC+=0.000249 4
152SMS G NC=0.000216 3$OC=3.14E-5 5$PC=1.729E-6 25
152SM cG RI$Values of 1990Me15, 1980Sh15, and 1971Ba63 are excluded
152SM G 286.50 11 0.0052 11
152SM2 G FLAG=U$
152SM G 345.54 3 0.0369 18
152SM cG RI$Weighted average of 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04. The transition is not
152SM2cG fully resolved in the other works from the 344|g in Gd
152SM G 493.54 4 0.114 5[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00444 7$KC=0.00380 6$LC=0.000504 7$MC=0.0001074 15$NC+=2.80E-5 4
152SMS G NC=2.42E-5 4$OC=3.59E-6 5$PC=2.16E-7 3
152SM cG E,RI$From 2007Ku20. The transition is also placed in Gd and is
152SM2cG unresolved in the other works. The placement in Sm is dominant and the
152SM3cG evaluator assumes that the measured energy can be assigned to this
152SM4cG placement
152SM G 538.29 6 0.0163 11 [M1,E2] 0.014 4
152SMS G KC=0.012 4$LC=0.0018 4$MC=0.00038 7$NC+=9.9E-5 18
152SMS G NC=8.6E-5 15$OC=1.27E-5 25$PC=7.3E-7 23
152SM G 556.48 10 0.0666 23[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00340 5$KC=0.00291 4$LC=0.000384 6$MC=8.17E-5 12$NC+=2.14E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.84E-5 3$OC=2.74E-6 4$PC=1.659E-7 24
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990St02. The value of
152SM2cG 556.562~{I27} reported by 1990Me15 is not consistent with the level
152SM3cG energy difference of 556.458~{I12}. The value May be a misprint
152SM G 616.05 5 0.0345 20[E2]
152SMS G CC=0.00750 11$KC=0.00624 9$LC=0.000991 14$MC=0.000215 3$NC+=5.58E-5 8
152SMS G NC=4.84E-5 7$OC=7.02E-6 10$PC=3.65E-7 6
152SM G 768.96 4 0.308 16[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.001719 24$KC=0.001475 21$LC=0.000192 3$MC=4.08E-5 6$NC+=1.068E-5 1
152SMS G NC=9.22E-6 13$OC=1.376E-6 20$PC=8.50E-8 12
152SM cG RI$The value of 2007Ku20 (0.433~{I14}) is excluded
152SM G 1212.948 11 5.320 21 E1
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.000756 11$KC=0.000624 9$LC=7.96E-5 12$MC=1.689E-5 24$NC+=3.61E-5 5
152SMS G NC=3.82E-6 6$OC=5.73E-7 8$PC=3.62E-8 5$IPC=3.17E-5 5
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00059~{I5} (1991Go22, 1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000624
152SM2cG (E1). other: the value of 0.00024~{I7} from 1967Ma29 is discrepant
152SM cG MR$0.00 {I2} (combined results of 1973Ka05, 1970He29, 1971Ba54,
152SM2cG 1970Ba32, 1969Aq01). Others: +0.04 {I2} (1985KrZU), -0.007~{I17}
152SM3cG (2008ZaZY)
152SM G 1457.643 11 1.869 14 E1
152SM2 G FLAG=H$
152SMS G CC=0.000703 10$KC=0.000453 7$LC=5.75E-5 8$MC=1.219E-5 17$NC+=0.000181 3
152SMS G NC=2.76E-6 4$OC=4.15E-7 6$PC=2.63E-8 4$IPC=0.0001775 25
152SM cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1977Ge12 are excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00050~{I8} (1967La13). |a(L)(theory)=0.000453 (E1)
152SM cG MR 0.00 {I3} (1985KrZU), 0.00 {I6} (combined results of |g|g(|q)
152SM2cG (1970Ba32,1970He29,1969Aq01)
152SM L 1612.88 4 4+
152SM E 0.0205 6 11.89 2
152SMS E CK=0.7964 2$CL=0.1566 2$CM+=0.04705 5
152SM G 241 0.0014 LT ?
152SM cG E,RI$Transition not seen. E|g is a rounded-off value from the E(level)
152SM2cG difference and I|g is the limit determined by 2007Ku20
152SM G 320.10 5 0.0077 4
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20, 2004Ca04, and 1990Me15
152SM G 378.15 24 0.0008921
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$FL=1233.8626$
152SM cG E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment. The
152SM2cG adjustment gives E|g=379.02
152SM G 391.19 7 0.0053016
152SM G 527.1 0.0007 LT ?
152SM cG E,RI$Transition not seen. E|g is a rounded-off value from the E(level)
152SM2cG difference and I|g is the limit determined by 2007Ku20.
152SM G 571.83 8 0.0167 6
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 589.83 17 0.0049 3
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 802.0 5 0.0015518
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 906.06 10 0.0345 15
152SM cG RI$From 2007Ku20. Others: 0.068~{I6} (1993Ka30), 0.056~{I5} (1990Me15).
152SM2cG the high values are inconsistent with data in Coulomb excitation
152SM G 1246.34 16 0.0035 5
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 1491.4 8 0.0022 10
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM L 1649.833 6 2-
152SM cL J$|g|g(|q) data are consistent with J=3, not with J=0 or 1
152SM E 0.928 9 10.078 6
152SMS E CK=0.7857 3$CL=0.16452 19$CM+=0.04982 7
152SM G 357.26 5 0.0229 16[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00953 14$KC=0.00814 12$LC=0.001095 16$MC=0.000234 4$NC+=6.09E-5 9
152SMS G NC=5.26E-5 8$OC=7.76E-6 11$PC=4.53E-7 7
152SM2 G FL=1292.753$
152SM G 416.02 3 0.409 7[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00660 10$KC=0.00565 8$LC=0.000755 11$MC=0.0001609 23$NC+=4.20E-5 6
152SMS G NC=3.63E-5 5$OC=5.36E-6 8$PC=3.17E-7 5
152SM G 563.986 5 1.856 16(E1)
152SM2 G FLAG=S$
152SMS G CC=0.00330 5$KC=0.00283 4$LC=0.000372 6$MC=7.93E-5 11$NC+=2.07E-5 3
152SMS G NC=1.79E-5 3$OC=2.66E-6 4$PC=1.612E-7 23
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0070~{I4} (1981Ka40) and 0.0036~{I17} (1967Ma29) do not
152SM2cG agree. |a(K)(theory)=0.00283 (E1), 0.00775 (E2). Placement in the
152SM3cG decay scheme requires |D|p=yes
152SM cG MR +0.07 {I+11-9} (1985KrZU)
152SM G 609.23 22 0.0046 6
152SM2 G FLAG=Z
152SM G 686.60 5 0.0762 25[M1,E2]
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SMS G CC=0.0078 20$KC=0.0066 18$LC=0.00093 20$MC=0.00020 4$NC+=5.2E-5 11
152SMS G NC=4.5E-5 10$OC=6.7E-6 15$PC=4.0E-7 12
152SM cG RI$From 2007Ku20. 2004VaZW report 0.075~{I7}
152SM G 839.36 4 0.0666 19[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.001444 21$KC=0.001240 18$LC=0.0001605 23$MC=3.41E-5 5$NC+=8.94E-6
152SMS G NC=7.72E-6 11$OC=1.153E-6 17$PC=7.16E-8 10
152SM cG RI$The value of 1990St02 is excluded
152SM G 1528.10 4 1.051 12 E1
152SMS G CC=0.000715 10$KC=0.000418 6$LC=5.30E-5 8$MC=1.124E-5 16$NC+=0.000232 4
152SMS G NC=2.54E-6 4$OC=3.82E-7 6$PC=2.43E-8 4$IPC=0.000229 4
152SM cG RI$The value of 1970Ri19 is excluded
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00040~{I3} (1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000418 (E1)
152SM cG MR -0.01 {I3} (1985KrZU), -0.01 {I6} (1970Ba32)
152SM L 1682.07 12 4-
152SM E 0.0036416 12.32 2
152SMS E CK=0.7718 4$CL=0.1748 3$CM+=0.05342 10
152SM G 1315.58 16 0.0137 6
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM L 1730.207 24 3-
152SM E 0.0538 24 10.82 2
152SMS E CK=0.7339 9$CL=0.2027 7$CM+=0.06334 22
152SM G 358.48 7 0.0062 5
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 496.56 24 0.022 8[E1]
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SMS G CC=0.00438 7$KC=0.00375 6$LC=0.000497 7$MC=0.0001059 15$NC+=2.77E-5 4
152SMS G NC=2.39E-5 4$OC=3.55E-6 5$PC=2.13E-7 3
152SM G 644.39 6 0.0248 18[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00248 4$KC=0.00212 3$LC=0.000278 4$MC=5.92E-5 9$NC+=1.548E-5 22
152SMS G NC=1.336E-5 19$OC=1.99E-6 3$PC=1.216E-7 17
152SM cG RI$The values of 1990St02 and 1971Ba63 are excluded
152SM G 707.16 7 0.0053521
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 766.38 18 0.0026 3
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM cG E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment. The
152SM2cG adjustment gives E|g=766.842~{I24}
152SM G 919.74 4 0.0244 14
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 1363.78 5 0.0972 22 (E1)
152SM cG M$Mult=d(+Q) with |d=-0.05~{I12} (1971Ba54). Placement in the decay
152SM2cG scheme requires |D|p=yes
152SM cG MR -0.05 {I12} (1971Ba54)
152SM G 1608.36 7 0.0203 8 E1
152SMS G CC=0.000735 11$KC=0.000384 6$LC=4.86E-5 7$MC=1.030E-5 15$NC+=0.000292 4
152SMS G NC=2.33E-6 4$OC=3.51E-7 5$PC=2.23E-8 4$IPC=0.000289 4
152SM cG RI$The value of 0.0030~{I6} given in 1993Ka30 is probably a misprint.
152SM2cG the evaluator assumes that the value should be 0.030~{I6} and includes
152SM3cG it in the weighted average
152SM cG M$Ice(K)(1608|g in Sm + 1606|g in Gd) from 1967La13 is consistent only
152SM2cG with mult=E1 for one transition and mult=E2 for the other. placement
152SM3cG of the 1604|g in Gd, from 2+ to 0+ requires mult=E2. this then
152SM4cG establishes mult(1608|g)=E1
152SM L 1757.001 14 4+
152SM E 0.054 3 10.57 3
152SMS E CK=0.6908 16$CL=0.2344 12$CM+=0.0748 5
152SM G 385.61 21 0.0209 9[M1,E2] 0.034 8
152SMS G KC=0.028 8$LC=0.0045 5$MC=0.00097 8$NC+=0.000253 23
152SMS G NC=0.000220 19$OC=3.2E-5 4$PC=1.7E-6 6
152SM cG RI$1990St02 report I|g=0.21~{I2}. This May be a misprint
152SM G 464.28 14 0.0017 7
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 523.13 5 0.0575 24[M1,E2] 0.015 4
152SMS G KC=0.013 4$LC=0.0019 4$MC=0.00041 7$NC+=0.000107 19
152SMS G NC=9.3E-5 16$OC=1.4E-5 3$PC=7.8E-7 25
152SM cG RI$The value of 0.0056~{I4} given in 1990Me15 is probably a misprint.
152SM2cG the evaluator assumes that the value should be 0.056~{I4} and includes
152SM3cG it in the weighted average
152SM G 671.155 14 0.092 16
152SM cG M$See comment in (|a,2n|g)
152SM G 734.14 12 0.0034 5
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 947.15 14 0.0041 7
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$FL=810.453$
152SM cG E$Poor fit. Not included in the least-squares adjustment. The
152SM2cG adjustment gives E|g=946.544~{I14}
152SM G 1050.1 6 0.0027 11
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 1390.50 12 0.0160 6
152SM G 1635.38 20 0.0006116
152SM cG E$Flag=Z
152SM L 1769.130 23 2+
152SM E 0.0816 21 10.25 2
152SMS E CK=0.6590 23$CL=0.2577 17$CM+=0.0833 6
152SM G 239.33 0.02 LT [E1] 0.0263 ?
152SMS G KC=0.0224 4$LC=0.00308 5$MC=0.000657 10$NC+=0.0001704 24
152SMS G NC=0.0001476 21$OC=2.16E-5 3$PC=1.208E-6 17
152SM cG E,RI$E is from the level energy difference and I|g is the limit from
152SM2cG 1971Ba63. 2007Ku20 report I|g<0.09. 1990St02 report E|g=239.47~{I33}
152SM3cG with I|g=0.04~{I1}, 1972Bb05 report E|g=238.8~{I10} with
152SM4cG I|g=0.25~{I12}, from |g|g
152SM G 397.75 26 0.0014022
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$
152SM G 476.42 9 0.0064 12
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 535.44 12 0.0065 5
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 683.25 9 0.0178 10
152SM cG RI$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 2004Ca04
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990Me15. The value of 683.70~{I9}
152SM2cG from 2004Ca04 appears to be discrepant. E|g=683.29~{I3} is expected
152SM3cG from Adopted Levels
152SM G 728.04 4 0.0418 14 [E1]
152SMS G CC=0.00192 3$KC=0.001648 23$LC=0.000215 3$MC=4.57E-5 7$NC+=1.195E-5 17
152SMS G NC=1.032E-5 15$OC=1.539E-6 22$PC=9.48E-8 14
152SM cG E$Weighted average from 2007Ku20 and 1990Me15. The value of
152SM2cG 727.42~{I16} reported by 1990St02 appears to be discrepant
152SM cG RI$From 2007Ku20
152SM G 805.71 9 0.0571 22[E1]
152SMS G CC=0.001565 22$KC=0.001344 19$LC=0.0001743 25$MC=3.71E-5 6$NC+=9.71E-6
152SMS G NC=8.38E-6 12$OC=1.251E-6 18$PC=7.75E-8 11
152SM G 958.63 5 0.074 4[M1,E2]
152SMS G CC=0.0035 9$KC=0.0030 8$LC=0.00041 9$MC=8.8E-5 18$NC+=2.3E-5 5
152SMS G NC=2.0E-5 4$OC=3.0E-6 7$PC=1.8E-7 5
152SM G 1084.38 11 0.040 3
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM G 1647.44 12 0.0273 13 E2(+M1) 0.6 GT
152SMS G CC=0.00117 13$KC=0.00089 10$LC=0.000117 13$MC=2.5E-5 3$NC+=0.000142 6
152SMS G NC=5.7E-6 7$OC=8.5E-7 10$PC=5.4E-8 7$IPC=0.000135 6
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00088~{I11} (1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.00106 (M1),
152SM2cG 0.000790 (E2)
152SM G 1769.09 4 0.0350 8 E2
152SMS G CC=0.000989 14$KC=0.000691 10$LC=9.09E-5 13$MC=1.94E-5 3$NC+=0.000188 3
152SMS G NC=4.38E-6 7$OC=6.57E-7 10$PC=4.12E-8 6$IPC=0.000182 3
152SM cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00072~{I5} (1967La13). |a(K)(theory)=0.000905 (M1),
152SM2cG 0.000691 (E2). |a(K)exp allows some M1; however, placement in the
152SM3cG decay scheme requires |DJ=2
152SM L 1776.56 5 2+
152SM E 0.0086 6 11.12 4
152SMS E CK=0.633 3$CL=0.2770 21$CM+=0.0903 8
152SM G 735.43 8 0.0166 7
152SM G 813.21 6 0.0162 16
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM L 1779.119 25 3-
152SM E 0.0124 4 10.93 2
152SMS E CK=0.622 4$CL=0.2849 23$CM+=0.0932 9
152SM G 756.16 3 0.0167 16
152SM G 968.65 4 0.0298 8
152SM2 G FLAG=W$
152SM L 1822.03 22 4-
152SM E 0.0049 12 10.37 11
152SMS E CK=0.078 17$CL=0.674 12$CM+=0.248 6
152SM G 588.6 3 0.009 4
152SM2 G FLAG=Z
152SM G 1455.1 3 0.0094 18
152SM2 G FLAG=Z$