152GD 152EU B- DECAY (13.517 Y) 13NDS 201311
152GD H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 114, 1497 (2013)$CUT=31-Aug-2013$
152GD cB No |b{+-} to {+152}Gd g.s. (I|b(g.s.)/I|b(to
152GDxcB 344)<0.36|*10{+-4}) (1967La13)
152GD cB J|p({+152}Eu (13.517 y))=3-
152GD cG E$Calibration standard values from 2000He14 are adopted where
152GD2cG available. Additional precise values are available from 1986Wa33 and
152GD3cG these values, adjusted by the evaluator to incorporate the energy
152GD4cG standards of 2000He14, are adopted as noted. 2004Ca04 report values for
152GD5cG very weak transitions not seen by other works, and resolve the 209|g
152GD6cG doublet whose other placement is in Sm. these energies are noted. For
152GD7cG unresolved doublets, energies are taken from 9.3-h Eu |b{+-} decay, or
152GD8cG from 17.5-h Tb |e decay, as noted. other values are weighted averages
152GD9cG of data from 1992Le19, 1990Me15, and 1990St02. For the data of
152GDacG 1990Me15, the evaluator has assigned a minimum uncertainty of 50 eV.
152GDbcG See comment in
152GDCCG 13-Y 152EU EC DECAY
152GD cG I(K| x ray)=3.14 {I5} (1986Me10)
152GD cG I(K|a| x ray)=0.00648 {I22} per decay, I(K|b| x ray)=0.00176
152GD2cG per decay (1979De36)
152GD cG For unplaced |g's see {+152}Eu |e decay (13.517 y)
152GD cG E(K)$From 2000He14
152GD cG E(U)$From 1986Wa33
152GD cG E(Z),RI(Z)$From 2004Ca04
152GD cG RI$Values are weighted averages of data of 2007Ku20, 2004Ca04,
152GD2cG 1998Hw07, 1993Ka30, 1992Ya12, 1990Me15, 1990St02, 1989Da12, 1986Me10,
152GD3cG 1984Iw03, 1980Sh15, 1979De21, 1977Ge12, 1975LeZH, 1972Bb05, 1971Ba63,
152GD4cG 1970No06, 1970Ri19, and 1969Va09 normalized to I|g=100 for the 344|g.
152GD5cG Some of the values adopted here differ from those of 2004VaZW, an
152GD6cG evaluation of data published prior to 2004. Some of these differences
152GD7cG are a result of inclusion here of the new work, 2007Ku20, and one older
152GD8cG reference, 1975LeZH. Another difference is one of policy. In 2004VaZW,
152GD9cG the uncertainties in the work of 1998Hw07 were increased by a factor of
152GDacG two. This was not done in the present evaluation.
152GDCCG ALSO, IN THE PRESENT EVALUATION, FOR THE DATA FROM 1990ME15,
152GDDCG AN UNCERTAINTY OF 2% HAS BEEN ADDED IN QUADRATURE TO TAKE INTO
152GDECG ACCOUNT THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION. INTENSITIES
152GDFCG FOR SOME WEAK TRANSITIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY 2004CA04, AND THESE
152GDGCG ARE NOTED. TRANSITIONS INDICATED AS BEING EXCLUDED IN INDIVIDUAL
152GDHCG CASES ARE OUTLIERS AS DETERMINED USING ^CHAUVENET'S CRITERION.
152GDICG FOR SOME UNRESOLVED DOUBLETS, THE EVALUATOR HAS ADOPTED VALUES
152GDJCG BASED ON BRANCHING IN 17.5-H TB EC DECAY, AS NOTED
152GD cG M$From Adopted Gammas. Mult data measured in this decay are given in
152GD2cG comments. The |a(K)exp data are from the adopted I|g values and Ice(K)
152GD3cG values of authors as noted for each transition, and normalized to
152GD4cG |a(K)(344|g)=0.03103, the theory value for mult=E2
152GD cG E(A),RI(A)$The 703|g is placed from the 1047 and 1318 levels with
152GD2cG I|g(doublet)=0.020~{I5}. The doublet is resolved in Tb |e decay, and
152GD3cG from I|g/I|g(974|g)=0.284~{I12} for the 1318 level, one gets
152GD4cG I|g=0.0145~{I11} for placement of the 703|g from that level, leaving
152GD5cG I|g=0.0055~{I51} for placement from the 1047 level. From the decay
152GD6cG scheme, one has the requirement that I|g(703|g from 1047) must be
152GD7cG greater than or equal to I|g(558|g from 1605)=0.0108~{I11}. From these
152GD8cG two approaches one gets I|g(703|g from 1047)=0.0102~{I5}. The evaluator
152GD9cG adopts |a conservative value of 0.010~{I1}. E|g for placement from the
152GDacG 1047 level is from 9.3-h Eu |b{+-} decay and for placement from the
152GDbcG 1318 level is from the E(level) difference
152GD cG RI(B)$A weighted average of all the measurements of the 269|g in Sm and
152GD2cG the 271|g in Gd is 0.299~{I7}. I|g for the 269|g in Sm has been
152GD3cG determined as 0.0295~{I19} leaving I|g(271|g in Gd)=0.269~{I7}. The
152GD4cG value of 1993Ka30 for the doublet has been excluded
152GD cL Additional levels have been proposed at: 1) 1312 keV
152GD2cL (1990St02,1993Ka30) depopulated by a 696.9-keV |g. However, the |g was
152GD3cL not seen by 1992Ya12, and the two measured intensities do not agree.
152GD4cL 2) 1485 keV (1990St02,1993Ka30) depopulated by 166.9- and 1485.9-keV
152GD5cL |g's, suggested J|p=0+. Again, the intensity measurements by the two
152GD6cL authors disagree and the |g's were looked for but not seen by 1992Ya12.
152GD7cL A 1485-keV E0 transition has been observed in {+152}Tb |e decay,
152GD8cL suggesting a possible 0+ level at 1485, however; the 1485-keV |g
152GD9cL obviously does not belong to a 0+ level. 3) 1698 keV (1990St02)
152GDAcL depopulated by 330.1- and 1698.1- keV |g's. The two |g's were looked
152GDBcL for but not seen by 1992Ya12.
152GD cL J$From Adopted Levels
152GD cL T$From Adopted Levels. Values from this decay are given in comments
152EU P 0.0 3- 13.517 Y 14 1818.9 7
152GD N 0.9524 0.9524 0.2792 13 3.578
152GD PN 3
152GD cN NR,BR$The absolute intensity of the 1408|g in Sm has been determined as
152GD2cN 20.85% 9 (2007BeZP). Normalization of the photon intensities to
152GD3cN I|g(344|g in Gd)=100 gives I|g(1408|g)=78.41~{I10} and |S\ I(|g+ce)(to
152GD4cN Gd g.s.)=105.02~{I21}. From these data one gets %|b{+-}=27.92~{I13} and
152GD5cN thus %|e=72.08~{I13}.
152GD L 0.0 0+
152GD L 344.2789 12 2+ 32.0 PS 27
152GD2 L G=+0.53 7 (1969ZM01)
152GD cL T in this data set: T{-1/2}=36 ps {I5} (1993Se08), 37 ps {I7}
152GD2cL (1974El03); others: 53 ps {I9} (1961Bu17), |?28 ps (1967Ab06)
152GD cL $g-factor: for halflife=32.0~ps~{I27}
152GD B 8.25 19 12.06 1
152GDS B EAV=535.49 30
152GD cB E 1481 {I2} (1978Ra10), 1483 {I7} (1960La04), 1470 {I10}
152GD2cB (1958Al99). Others: 1960Sc14, 1960Mu05, 1958Bh13, 1957Co47
152GD cB Spectrum has: unique shape (1960Sc14,1958Bh13,1957Co47);
152GD2cB F-K plot is linear (1960Mu05,1958Al99,1957Na01). This branch is
152GD3cB a 3- to 2+ transition
152GD cB IB (F-K analysis): 24.9% (1960Sc14), 27% (1958Bh13);
152GD2cB others: 17.6% (1960La04), 19% {I2} (1960Mu05), 21% (1957Co47)
152GD cB Polarization: P=-0.96 {I3} (V/C) with P({+32}P)=-1 (V/C)
152GDxcB (1968Wa02)
152GD G 344.2785 12 100.0 6 E2 0.0397
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G KC=0.0310 5$LC=0.00678 10$MC=0.001527 22$NC+=0.000398 6
152GDS G NC=0.000346 5$OC=4.97E-5 7$PC=1.99E-6 3
152GD cG M$K:L1:L2:L3=100~{I35}:12.1~{I4}:6.55~{I24}:4.46~{I17} (1985Co08).
152GD2cG Other: 1967Ma29. K/L=4.46~{I10} (weighted average of 1985Co08,
152GD3cG 1981Ka40, 1978Ar24, and 1967Ma29). The value of 1985Co08 used in this
152GD4cG average comes from their subshell ratios. K/(MNO)=16.2~{I6} (1983KaZJ)
152GD cG Particle parameters: 1969Ag02, 1968Zg02, 1967Na09
152GD L 615.415 19 0+ 37 PS 8
152GD G 271.08 4 0.269 7 E2 0.0827
152GDS G KC=0.0621 9$LC=0.01602 23$MC=0.00365 6$NC+=0.000943 14
152GDS G NC=0.000823 12$OC=0.0001159 17$PC=3.81E-6 6
152GD2 G FLAG=B$
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.074~{I8} (1991Go22), 0.033~{I13} (1967Ma29).
152GD2cG L1/L2=1.34~{I6}, L1/L3=1.85~{I8} (1987BaYQ). K/L=4.2~{I+65-23}
152GD3cG (1967Ma29)
152GD G 615.41 5 E0 0.0376 12
152GD cG E$1985Co08 report E|g=615.406~{I11} based on calibration using data of
152GD2cG 1990Me15. The value given here reflects the evaluator's changes to the
152GD3cG uncertainties of 1990Me15. See the comment on E|g
152GD cG TI$from I(ce(K))=0.0330 {I10} (1991Go22,1985Co08,1979De22, 1967Ma29)
152GD2cG and Ice(K)/Ice=0.877 (E0 theory)
152GD cG M no |g seen
152GD cG |r=0.25 {I15} (1990Ka35)
152GD L 755.3960 17 4+ 7.3 PS 4
152GD cL J |g|g(|q) (1992Ya14,1975He13), |g|g(|q,H,T) (1985KrZU)
152GD cL T 4 ps {I5} (1993Se08)
152GD B 0.914 10 12.49 1
152GDS B EAV=364.69 29
152GD cB E 1022 {I31} (1960Mu05), 1072 {I20} (1960Sc14), 1040
152GD2cB {I25}(1958Bh13), 1050 {I20} (1957Co47)
152GD cB IB (F-K analysis): 4.6% (1960Sc14), 5% {I1} (1960Mu05), 9%
152GD2cB (1958Bh13), 6% (1957Co47)
152GD G 411.1165 12 8.413 26 E2 0.0238
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G KC=0.0190 3$LC=0.00374 6$MC=0.000837 12$NC+=0.000219 3
152GDS G NC=0.000190 3$OC=2.77E-5 4$PC=1.246E-6 18
152GD cG RI$The values of 1970No06 and 1970Ri19 are excluded
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0186~{I7} (1991Go22),0.0193~{I7} (1985Co08), 0.0217~{I19}
152GD2cG (1981Ka40), 0.0188~{I11} (1979De22), 0.0179~{I16} (1967Ma29). The ce(K)
152GD3cG intensities used to generate these values have been corrected for the
152GD4cG presence of the L1 line of the 368|g. K/L=4.9~{I3}, a weighted average
152GD5cG from 1991Go22 and 1967Ma29
152GD cG M$2008ZaZY report |d=+0.032~{I22}; however, this is inconsistent with
152GD2cG the RUL limit of B(M3)(W.u.)<10 which requires |d<4|*10{+-5}
152GD L 930.546 3 2+ 7.3 PS 6
152GD cL J |g|g(|q,H,T) (1985KrZU), |g|g(|q) (1970Ba32)
152GD cL T 5 ps {I5} (1993Se08)
152GD B 0.284 6 12.71 1
152GDS B EAV=295.12 28
152GD G 174.80 22 0.0052 7
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 315.10 3 0.150 4(E2) 0.0518
152GDS G KC=0.0400 6$LC=0.00925 13$MC=0.00209 3$NC+=0.000543 8
152GDS G NC=0.000473 7$OC=6.75E-5 10$PC=2.52E-6 4
152GD cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30, 1990St03, 1990Me15, and 1970Ri19 have been
152GD2cG corrected by the evaluator for the contribution of I|g=0.0384~{I15}
152GD3cG from the 316|g in Sm. The value of 1980Sh15 has been excluded
152GD cG M |a(K)exp=0.032 {I20} (1967Ma29)
152GD G 586.2648 26 1.710 13 E0+M1+E2 0.013 4
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G KC=0.011 4$LC=0.0016 4$MC=0.00036 8$NC+=9.5E-5 21
152GDS G NC=8.2E-5 18$OC=1.3E-5 3$PC=8.E-7 3
152GD cG RI$The value of 1.37~{I4} given in 1993Ka30 is probably a misprint.
152GD2cG the evaluator assumes that the value should be 1.73~{I4} and includes
152GD3cG it in the weighted average
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0199~{I10} (1991Go22), 0.0225~{I10} (1985Co08),
152GD2cG 0.0177~{I18} (1979De22), 0.027~{I5} (1967Ma29). K/L=12~{I+7-4}
152GD3cG (1967Ma29) I(ce(K))(E0)/I(ce(K))(E2)=1.74 {I9} from |a(K)exp and |d
152GD4cG (evaluator); other: 1.7 {I2} (1990Ka35)
152GD cG MR$-3.05~{I14}. Other: -5.5~{I+22-50} (1985KrZU), -2.0~{I5} (1970Ba32)
152GD cG CC$From |a(K)exp, |d=-3.05~{I14}, and Ice(E0)/Ice(M1+E2)=2.43~{I16}
152GD G 930.59 5 0.274 7(E2)
152GDS G CC=0.00320 5$KC=0.00270 4$LC=0.000396 6$MC=8.63E-5 12$NC+=2.30E-5 4
152GDS G NC=1.98E-5 3$OC=3.02E-6 5$PC=1.87E-7 3
152GD L 1047.81 6 0+
152GD G 703.55 6 0.010 1
152GD2 G FLAG=A$
152GD L 1109.200 18 2+
152GD B 0.264 9 12.40 2
152GDS B EAV=226.90 27
152GD G 354.16 15 0.0036 4
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 493.78 0.0367 16[E2] 0.01442
152GDS G KC=0.01171 17$LC=0.00211 3$MC=0.000469 7$NC+=0.0001233 18
152GDS G NC=0.0001068 15$OC=1.577E-5 22$PC=7.85E-7 11
152GD cG E,RI$The 493|g is placed from the 1579 level in Sm and from the 1109
152GD2cG level in Gd, with I|g(doublet)=0.149~{I8}. The value of 1993Ka30 is
152GD3cG excluded. E|g is given as a rounded-off value from the level energies,
152GD4cG and I|g is deduced from I|g/I|g(764|g)=0.0516~{I19} in 17.5-h Tb |e
152GD5cG decay. I|g=0.114~{I5} for the component in Sm along with I|g for the
152GD6cG doublet yields I|g=0.035~{I10} for the component in Gd, consistent with
152GD7cG the value using the Tb decay ratio
152GD G 764.88 4 0.712 16M1+E2(+E0) 0.0070 6
152GDS G KC=0.0058 17$LC=0.00083 20$MC=0.00018 4$NC+=4.8E-5 12
152GDS G NC=4.1E-5 10$OC=6.4E-6 16$PC=4.1E-7 13
152GD cG RI$The values of 1980Sh15 and 1975LeZH are excluded
152GD cG M$|d(E2/M1)=+4.30~{I+7-6} (1990Ka35)
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0063~{I8} (1991Go22), 0.0055~{I16} (1990Ka35, 0.0052~{I14}
152GD2cG (1983KaZJ)
152GD cG MR$4.30~{I+7-6} (1990Ka35). Ice(E0)/Ice(E2)=0.44~{I17} from the
152GD2cG measured and theoretical |a(K) values
152GD G 1109.18 5 0.709 24 E2
152GDS G CC=0.00222 4$KC=0.00188 3$LC=0.000267 4$MC=5.80E-5 9$NC+=1.589E-5 23
152GDS G NC=1.330E-5 19$OC=2.04E-6 3$PC=1.304E-7 19$IPC=4.21E-7 6
152GD L 1123.1855 21 3-
152GD cL J J=3 from |b|g(|q) (1966Ci02,1965Bh03,1963Su08,1960Su07),
152GD2cL |g(|q,H,T) (1985KrZU)
152GD B 13.74 9 10.654 4
152GDS B EAV=221.69 26
152GD cB E 690 {I20} (1960Sc14), 720 {I22} (1960Mu05), 710 {I20}
152GD2cB (1958Bh13), 680 20 (1957Co47)
152GD cB IB (F-K analysis): 50.9% (1960Sc14), 46% {I5} (1960Mu05), 64%
152GD2cB (1958Bh13), 51% (1957Co47)
152GD cB A{-2}(|b)=-0.017 {I12} in |b|g(|q), indicating allowed |b
152GD2cB decay (1966Ci02)
152GD cB Deduced C(V)M(F)/C(A)M(GT) |b|g(|q,circular pol.)
152GD2cB (1969Be28,1965Bh03,1964Co33)
152GD G 192.60 5 0.0256 8[E1] 0.0502
152GDS G KC=0.0425 6$LC=0.00603 9$MC=0.001304 19$NC+=0.000344 5
152GDS G NC=0.000297 5$OC=4.46E-5 7$PC=2.59E-6 4
152GD G 367.7891 20 3.232 15 E1
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G CC=0.00964 14$KC=0.00821 12$LC=0.001125 16$MC=0.000243 4$NC+=6.45E-5 9
152GDS G NC=5.55E-5 8$OC=8.47E-6 12$PC=5.31E-7 8
152GD cG RI$The values of 1970No06 and 1969Va09 are excluded
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0089~{I5} (1991Go22), 0.0061~{I8} (1967Ma29)
152GD cG MR$|d(M2/E1)=+0.015~{I19} (1985KrZU), +0.1~{I2} (1983Bl07); -0.03~{I2}
152GD2cG (1975He13), -0.04~{I4} (1970Ba32)
152GD G 778.9045 24 48.62 22 E1
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G CC=0.00184 3$KC=0.001576 22$LC=0.000208 3$MC=4.47E-5 7$NC+=1.195E-5 17
152GDS G NC=1.026E-5 15$OC=1.585E-6 23$PC=1.054E-7 15
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00150~{I6} (1991Go22), 0.00168~{I6} (1985Co08),
152GD2cG 0.00158~{I8} (1981Ka40), 0.00141~{I8} (1979De22), 0.00168~{I19}
152GD3cG (1967Ma29) K/L=7.5~{I10} (1991Go22), 8.3~{I+27-16} 1967Ma29).
152GD4cG K/Mn+=30~{I+10-6} (1991Go22)
152GD cG MR$+0.003~{I6} (1975He13), -0.050~{I+9-8} (1985KrZU), -0.02~{I2}
152GD2cG 1983Bl07), +0.01~{I1} (1970Ba32), +0.026~{I10} (2008ZaZY)
152GD L 1282.24 4 4+
152GD B 0.0232 12 13.04 3
152GDS B EAV=164.10 25
152GD G 172.1 4 0.0016 8[E2] 0.369 ?
152GDS G KC=0.244 4$LC=0.0969 17$MC=0.0225 4$NC+=0.00574 10
152GDS G NC=0.00504 9$OC=0.000684 12$PC=1.350E-5 21
152GD cG E,RI$1990St02 report E|g=173.17~{I15} with I|g=0.03~{I1}, 1990Me15
152GD2cG report E|g=172.1~{I4} with I|g=0.0016~{I8}, and 1993Ka30 report
152GD3cG I|g=0.063~{I2}; however, this transition is not reported in 17.5H Tb |e
152GD4cG decay, nor in (|a,xn|g). From the energy level difference one expects
152GD5cG E|g=173.08~{I5}. The transition, as placed here, is thus suspect
152GD G 351.66 5 0.040 3 E2 0.0373
152GDS G KC=0.0292 4$LC=0.00630 9$MC=0.001418 20$NC+=0.000370 6
152GDS G NC=0.000321 5$OC=4.63E-5 7$PC=1.88E-6 3
152GD cG RI$From I|g/I|g(526|g)=0.884~{I29} in 17-5-h Tb |e decay. The directly
152GD2cG measured values are not consistent, 0.08~{I2} (1993Ka30), 0.034~{I3}
152GD3cG (1990Me15), 0.07~{I2} (1990St02) and 0.08~{I2} (1980Sh15)
152GD G 526.88 5 0.045 3 E0+M1+E2 0.017 5
152GDS G KC=0.014 5$LC=0.0022 5$MC=0.00048 9$NC+=0.00013 3
152GDS G NC=0.000109 21$OC=1.7E-5 4$PC=1.0E-6 4
152GD L 1314.640 24 1-
152GD G 970.22 9 0.0045 12 E1+M2 -0.021 12
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GDS G CC=0.001207 19$KC=0.001035 16$LC=0.0001354 21$MC=2.91E-5 5$NC+=7.78E-6
152GDS G NC=6.67E-6 11$OC=1.034E-6 16$PC=6.96E-8 11
152GD G 1314.6 0.0072 20 E1
152GDS G CC=0.000773 11$KC=0.000595 9$LC=7.69E-5 11$MC=1.649E-5 23$NC+=8.45E-5 1
152GDS G NC=3.79E-6 6$OC=5.88E-7 9$PC=4.01E-8 6$IPC=8.01E-5 12
152GD cG E,RI$The 1315|g is placed in Sm and in Gd with the Sm component
152GD2cG dominant. For the component from the 1315 level, E|g is |a rounded-off
152GD3cG value from the level energies, and I|g is from
152GD4cG I|g/I|g(970|g)=1.62~{I5}, a weighted average of values in 17.5-h Tb |e
152GD5cG decay and 9.3-h Eu |b{+-} decay
152GD L 1318.456 20 2+
152GD B 0.0189 10 13.03 3
152GDS B EAV=151.44 25
152GD G 195.22 15 0.0077 7 E1 0.0484
152GDS G KC=0.0410 6$LC=0.00582 9$MC=0.001259 18$NC+=0.000332 5
152GDS G NC=0.000287 4$OC=4.31E-5 6$PC=2.50E-6 4
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 209.3 0.00064 4
152GD cG E,RI$Not resolved from the 209|g components from the 1643 level and a
152GD2cG placement in Sm. E|g is a rounded-off value from the level energies,
152GD3cG and I|g is from I|g/I|g(195|g+974|g+1318|g)=0.0099~{I4} in 17.5-h Tb |e
152GD4cG decay
152GD G 387.90 8 0.011 1(M1+E2+E0) 0.038 11
152GDS G KC=0.032 10$LC=0.0052 7$MC=0.00113 12$NC+=0.00030 4
152GDS G NC=0.00026 3$OC=3.9E-5 6$PC=2.2E-6 8
152GD cG E,RI$From 1990Me15. I|g is somewhat higher than the value of
152GD2cG 0.0064~{I5} that one deduces from I|g/I|g(974|g)=0.124~{I5} in 17.5-h
152GD3cG Tb |e decay
152GD G 563.1 0.00113 8
152GD cG E,RI$The 563|g is doubly placed with a second component reported in Sm
152GD2cG with I|g=0.076~{I7} from the 684 level (2007Ku20). E|g is |a
152GD3cG rounded-off value from the level energies and I|g is from
152GD4cG I|g/I|g(974|g)=0.0222~{I8} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay
152GD G 703.01 0.0145 11[E2]
152GD3 G FLAG=A$
152GDS G CC=0.00599 9$KC=0.00498 7$LC=0.000788 11$MC=0.0001727 25$NC+=4.58E-5 7
152GDS G NC=3.95E-5 6$OC=5.96E-6 9$PC=3.42E-7 5
152GD G 974.09 5 0.051 3 M1+E2 +0.58 7
152GDS G CC=0.0039 10$KC=0.0033 9$LC=0.00046 11$MC=0.000100 22$NC+=2.7E-5 6
152GDS G NC=2.3E-5 6$OC=3.5E-6 9$PC=2.3E-7 7
152GD G 1318.38 17 0.0059 5
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD L 1434.020 4 3+
152GD cL J J=3 from |g(|q,H,T) (1985KrZU,1975He13), from |g|g(|q):
152GD2cL (1970Ba32); |p=+ from |b|g(|q) (1966Ci02,1965Sc06)
152GD B 2.432 15 10.537 5
152GDS B EAV=112.34 23
152GD cB E 360 {I30} (60sc14*), 417 {I13} (1960Mu05), 360 {I40}
152GDxcB (1957Co47)
152GD cB IB I|b{+-}(F-K analysis)=12.9% (1960Sc14), 29% {I3} (1960Mu05),
152GD2cB 13% (1957Co47)
152GD cB Nonvanishing anisotropy in |b|g(|q) indicates first
152GD2cB forbidden transition (1966Ci02)
152GD G 324.83 3 0.256 7[M1,E2] 0.062 15
152GDS G KC=0.051 15$LC=0.0088 5$MC=0.00194 7$NC+=0.00051 3
152GDS G NC=0.000443 20$OC=6.6E-5 6$PC=3.6E-6 13
152GD cG RI$The 324|g is placed from the 1434 and 1643 levels with
152GD2cG I|g(doublet)=0.275~{I7}. The value of 1993Ka30 is excluded.
152GD3cG I|g=0.0187~{I9} has been determined by 2004Ca04 for the component from
152GD4cG the 1643 level leaving I|g=0.256~{I7} for the component from the 1434
152GD5cG level
152GD G 503.467 9 0.573 7(E2) 0.01370
152GD2 G FLAG=U$
152GDS G KC=0.01115 16$LC=0.00199 3$MC=0.000442 7$NC+=0.0001164 17
152GDS G NC=0.0001007 14$OC=1.490E-5 21$PC=7.48E-7 11
152GD cG RI$The value of 1993Ka30 is excluded
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0170~{I26} (1991Go22), 0.018~{I6} (1967Ma29)
152GD G 678.623 5 1.777 12 M1+E2 +4.1 +17-11
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G CC=0.00680 25$KC=0.00566 22$LC=0.00089 3$MC=0.000196 6$NC+=5.19E-5 15
152GDS G NC=4.47E-5 13$OC=6.76E-6 21$PC=3.90E-7 17
152GD cG RI$The values of 1970Ri19 and 1990St02 are excluded
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0058~{I4} (1991Go22), 0.0048~{I8} (1967Ma29)
152GD cG MR$+4.1~{I+17-11} (1985KrZU), >+13 or <-16 (1975He13), >+12.5 or <-9.1
152GD2cG (1970Ba32)
152GD G 1089.737 5 6.52 3 M1+E2 +22 +13-6
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G CC=0.00231 4$KC=0.00195 3$LC=0.000278 4$MC=6.04E-5 9$NC+=1.611E-5 23
152GDS G NC=1.384E-5 20$OC=2.13E-6 3$PC=1.354E-7 20
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00217~{I9} (1985Co08), 0.0038~{I3} (1981Ka40)
152GD cG MR$From 1975He13. Others: +20~{I+23-8} (1985KrZU). >+17, <-13
152GD2cG (1970Ba32). 1970Ba32 also give a small solution but that is ruled out
152GD3cG by |a(K)exp
152GD L 1550.17 5 4+
152GD B 0.0456 22 11.76 2
152GDS B EAV=75.29 22
152GD G 440.86 10 0.0235 16[E2] 0.0196
152GDS G KC=0.01574 22$LC=0.00299 5$MC=0.000668 10$NC+=0.0001751 25
152GDS G NC=0.0001518 22$OC=2.22E-5 4$PC=1.042E-6 15
152GD cG RI$1993Ka30 report a doublet at this energy with I|g=0.054~{I5}, but
152GD2cG show no placement for either component. 1990Me15 report a single peak
152GD3cG with I|g=0.041~{I7}. The transition is not reported in any of the other
152GD4cG sources, but May have been masked by the strong 444|g in Sm. A weighted
152GD5cG average of these two values is 0.050~{I6}. from
152GD6cG I|g/I|g(795|g+1206|g)=0.159~{I6} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay one expects
152GD7cG I|g(441|g)=0.0235~{I16}. The evaluator adopts the value from the Tb
152GD8cG ratio
152GD G 794.78 5 0.099 6 M1(+E2) -0.4 +7-12
152GDS G CC=0.0075 20$KC=0.0064 18$LC=0.00088 21$MC=0.00019 5$NC+=5.1E-5 12
152GDS G NC=4.4E-5 10$OC=6.8E-6 17$PC=4.6E-7 14
152GD G 1206.09 16 0.049 5[E2]
152GDS G CC=0.00188 3$KC=0.001593 23$LC=0.000223 4$MC=4.83E-5 7$NC+=1.91E-5 3
152GDS G NC=1.109E-5 16$OC=1.708E-6 24$PC=1.104E-7 16$IPC=6.18E-6 9
152GD L 1605.596 25 2+
152GD B 0.1068 22 11.07 1
152GDS B EAV=58.49 21
152GD G 287.10 12 0.0030526
152GD2 G FLAG=Z
152GD G 482.4 0.0088 4[E1]
152GDS G CC=0.00511 8$KC=0.00436 7$LC=0.000589 9$MC=0.0001270 18$NC+=3.38E-5 5
152GDS G NC=2.91E-5 4$OC=4.46E-6 7$PC=2.86E-7 4
152GD cG E,RI$The 482|g is placed in Sm and Gd. For the component from the 1606
152GD2cG level, E|g is from the level energy difference and I|g is from
152GD3cG I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.0360~{I11} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay
152GD G 496.4 0.0221 9 E0+M1+E2 0.020 6
152GDS G KC=0.017 6$LC=0.0026 5$MC=0.00056 10$NC+=0.00015 3
152GDS G NC=0.000128 24$OC=2.0E-5 4$PC=1.2E-6 5
152GD cG E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from
152GD2cG the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is
152GD3cG deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.0906~{I25} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay
152GD G 557.8 0.0110 13[E2] 0.01051
152GDS G KC=0.00862 12$LC=0.001477 21$MC=0.000326 5$NC+=8.61E-5 12
152GDS G NC=7.44E-5 11$OC=1.109E-5 16$PC=5.84E-7 9
152GD cG E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from
152GD2cG the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is
152GD3cG deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.045~{I5} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay
152GD G 675.0 0.080 3 M1+E2 +2.2 4
152GDS G CC=0.0075 4$KC=0.0063 4$LC=0.00096 4$MC=0.000211 8$NC+=5.61E-5 21
152GDS G NC=4.83E-5 18$OC=7.3E-6 3$PC=4.37E-7 25
152GD cG E,RI$The transition is placed in both Sm and Gd. For the component from
152GD2cG the 1606 level, E|g is from the level energy difference, and I|g is
152GD3cG deduced from I|g/I|g(990|g+1261|g)=0.329~{I9} in 17.5-h Tb |e decay
152GD G 850.10 13 0.0029 3
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 990.18 5 0.118 5 E2 0.00281
152GDS G KC=0.00237 4$LC=0.000344 5$MC=7.48E-5 11$NC+=1.99E-5 3
152GDS G NC=1.714E-5 24$OC=2.62E-6 4$PC=1.642E-7 23
152GD cG RI$The value of 1975LeZH is excluded
152GD G 1261.35 5 0.126 5 M1
152GDS G CC=0.00265 4$KC=0.00225 4$LC=0.000303 5$MC=6.53E-5 10$NC+=3.26E-5 5
152GDS G NC=1.505E-5 21$OC=2.35E-6 4$PC=1.620E-7 23$IPC=1.508E-5 22
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0073~{I31} (1967La13) does not agree with
152GD2cG |a(K)exp=0.0019~{I2} measured in 17.5-h Tb |e decay. The Tb decay value
152GD3cG gives mult=M1 while the value of 1967La13 would require an E0 component
152GD G 1605.62 7 0.0296 14 E2
152GDS G CC=0.001190 17$KC=0.000919 13$LC=0.0001243 18$MC=2.68E-5 4$NC+=0.000119
152GDS G NC=6.16E-6 9$OC=9.55E-7 14$PC=6.38E-8 9$IPC=0.0001125 16
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.00096~{I9} (1967La13)
152GD L 1643.421 8 2-
152GD cL J J=2 from |g(|q,H,T) (1985KrZU,1975He13); from |b|g(|q)
152GD2cL (1966Ci02); from |g|g(|q) (1970Ba32)
152GD B 1.833 12 9.567 7
152GDS B EAV=47.38 21
152GD cB E 190 {I40} (1960Sc14), 220 {I40} (1957Co47)
152GD cB IB I|b{+-}(F-K analysis)=6.2% (1960Sc14), 9% (1957Co47)
152GD cB A{-2}(|b)=+0.016 {I20} in |b|g(|q), indicating allowed
152GD2cB |b-decay (1966Ci02)
152GD G 209.41 13 0.0045 15[E1] 0.0402
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GDS G KC=0.0341 5$LC=0.00482 7$MC=0.001041 15$NC+=0.000275 4
152GDS G NC=0.000237 4$OC=3.57E-5 5$PC=2.10E-6 3
152GD cG E,RI$From 2004Ca04. This transition is an unresolved doublet in all
152GD2cG other works, with the main component being from the 1293 level in Sm,
152GD3cG with I|g=0.0162~{I26}. A weighted average of all measurements of the
152GD4cG doublet gives I|g=0.0209~{I20}. The component from the 1643 level in
152GD5cG this decay and the component in Sm sum to 0.0207~{I30}, in good
152GD6cG agreement with the value measured for the doublet
152GD G 324.914 26 0.0187 9
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 328.764 26 0.0130 8
152GD2 G FLAG=Z$
152GD G 520.24 4 0.201 6[M1,E2] 0.018 6
152GDS G KC=0.015 5$LC=0.0023 5$MC=0.00049 10$NC+=0.00013 3
152GDS G NC=0.000113 22$OC=1.7E-5 4$PC=1.1E-6 4
152GD cG RI$The value of 1993Ka30 is excluded
152GD G 534.25 5 0.154 4[E1]
152GDS G CC=0.00407 6$KC=0.00347 5$LC=0.000467 7$MC=0.0001005 14$NC+=2.68E-5 4
152GDS G NC=2.30E-5 4$OC=3.54E-6 5$PC=2.29E-7 4
152GD cG RI$The 534|g is placed in Sm and Gd with I|g=0.1609~{I38}. The
152GD2cG component from the 1769 level in Sm has I|g=0.0065~{I5} leaving
152GD3cG I|g=0.154~{I4} for the component from the 1643 level
152GD G 712.83 5 0.359 9[E1]
152GDS G CC=0.00220 3$KC=0.00188 3$LC=0.000250 4$MC=5.37E-5 8$NC+=1.434E-5 20
152GDS G NC=1.232E-5 18$OC=1.90E-6 3$PC=1.257E-7 18
152GD cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1970Ri19 are excluded
152GD cG MR$|d=+0.06~{I+19-15} (1985KrZU)
152GD G 1299.142 8 6.14 3 E1+M2
152GD2 G FLAG=K$
152GDS G CC=0.000788 14$KC=0.000615 12$LC=7.97E-5 16$MC=1.71E-5 4$NC+=7.62E-5 11
152GDS G NC=3.92E-6 8$OC=6.10E-7 12$PC=4.16E-8 9$IPC=7.16E-5 10
152GD cG M$|a(K)exp=0.0056~{I5} (1991Go22). The authors' Ice(K) value has been
152GD2cG corrected by the evaluator for the contribution from the 1292.8|g in Sm
152GD3cG following Eu |e decay
152GD cG MR$+0.043~{I17} (1985KrZU), -0.00~{I8} (1983Bl07), +0.00~{I3}
152GD2cG (1975He13), -0.05~{I5} (1970Ba32)
152GD L 1692.40 7 2+,3+
152GD B 0.0199 12 11.09 3
152GDS B EAV=33.45 20
152GD G 937.05 15 0.010 3[M1,E2]
152GDS G CC=0.0043 11$KC=0.0036 10$LC=0.00050 12$MC=0.000109 25$NC+=2.9E-5 7
152GDS G NC=2.5E-5 6$OC=3.9E-6 10$PC=2.6E-7 8
152GD G 1348.10 7 0.065 3 M1+E2 -13 +4-7
152GDS G CC=0.001541 22$KC=0.001285 19$LC=0.000177 3$MC=3.83E-5 6$NC+=4.03E-5 6
152GDS G NC=8.80E-6 13$OC=1.359E-6 20$PC=8.92E-8 13$IPC=3.00E-5 5
152GD cG RI$The values of 1993Ka30 and 1970Ri19 are excluded