149PM 149ND B- DECAY (1.726 H) 1979SC12,1986II01,2003ME0122NDS 202210
149PM H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 185, 2 (2022)$
149PM2 H CUT=23-Aug-2022$
149PM c 1979Sc12 (also 1979ScZL thesis): measured E|g, I|g, |g|g at Lawrence
149PM2c Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).
149PM c 1986Ii01: measured |g, |g|g, |g|g(|q) at Kyoto University. |g-ray
149PM2c energies and intensities generally agree with those in 1979Sc12 and
149PM3c 1968He19. Authors report 199 |g rays, but energy and intensity
149PM4c uncertainties were not given.
149PM c 2003Me01: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g at Instituto De Pesquisas Energeticas
149PM2c e Nucleares, Sao Paulo (IPEN).
149PM c 1966He04, 1968He19: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |b{+-}, level
149PM2c half-life by |b|g(t), half-life of {+149}Nd decay
149PM c Other main references:
149PM c 1997Gr09, 1996Gr20: total absorption |g ray spectra (TAGS);
149PM2c deduced direct |b{+-} feedings
149PM c 1987Si13 (also 1989SiZQ): |g, |g(|q,H,temp) on oriented nuclei.
149PM2c Orientation was done at <16|' mK in gadolinium host nuclei.
149PM3c The 654|g was used for normalization for determination of the
149PM4c orientation parameter B{-2}. The A{-4} terms were all zero within the
149PM5c statistical uncertainties. The A{-2} values are given under comments
149PM c 1970Se11: |g|g(|q), |gce(t), |g|g(|q,H,t) (magnetic moments
149PM2c by DPAC method)
149PM c 1970Be67: |g|g(|q,H,t) (magnetic moments by IPAC method)
149PM c Others:
149PM c |g: 1976CoZJ, 1973St22, 1972De67, 1972BaZU, 1970SeZY, 1969Gr32,
149PM2c 1967He20, 1966He04, 1966Go17, 1966Go05, 1965Ni03, 1965Cu01, 1965Ch09
149PM c ce: 1972BaZU
149PM c |b{+-}, |b|g: 1964Go08, 1952Ru10
149PM c |g|g: 1965Cu01, 1965Ch09
149PM c |g|g(t): 1970Se11, 1969Ta08, 1968Az04, 1966Go05
149PM c |b|g(t): 1965Fo08, 1968Az04
149PM c |b ce(t): 1967Ba27
149PM c |g ce(t): 1967Ba27, 1970Se11
149PM c |g|g(|q): 1969Be25, 1966Go05, 1966Sv01, 1965Ch09
149PM c |g|g(|q,H,t): 1969Ta08, 1966Sv01, 1965Bo16
149PM c T{-1/2} and production of {+149}Nd: 1990Ab02, 1981Di01, 1980GuZN,
149PM2c 1973St22, 1967Me19, 1966Ri03, 1966He04, 1965Fo08, 1964Go08, 1964Ho03,
149PM3c 1960Wi10, 1952Ru10, 1950Ma05, 1946Bo25, 1938Po05
149PM c The level scheme is basically that of 1979Sc12 with some
149PM2c modifications as suggested by 1986Ii01 and 2003Me01.
149PM c Total decay energy deposit of 1736 keV {I56} calculated by RADLIST
149PM2c code is in general agreement with expected value of 1688.9 keV {I25}
149PM3c (2021Wa16), indicating the completeness of the decay scheme.
149PM cB IB$From |g-ray intensity balance. The values agree well with
149PM2cB those from TAGS data of 1997Gr09. 2003Me01 quote following
149PM3cB |b{+-} feedings for some of the levels where no feedings are found
149PM4cB from |g-ray intensity balance based on level scheme and I|g data
149PM5cB adopted here: 0.52 for 240 level; 0.031 for 636 level; 0.014 for
149PM6cB 957 level
149PM cG $The E|g and I|g data from 2003Me01 are
149PM2cG not used in averaging E|g and I|g values, since the spectra
149PM3cG presented in this paper seem to contain large contributions either
149PM4cG from background peaks or from other contaminants. Several strong
149PM5cG |g rays reported in this paper are not seen in earlier papers
149PM6cG (1979Sc12,1986Ii01,1968He19). Moreover, within the quoted
149PM7cG uncertainties for E|g values, many |g-ray energies do not agree
149PM8cG well with level-energy differences; deviations being many times
149PM9cG the quoted uncertainties. Thus there is a problem
149PMAcG of internal consistency of level scheme in this paper.
149PMBcG Only some of the weak transitions from 2003Me01 are tentatively
149PMCcG incorporated in the level scheme given here. E|g and I|g data
149PMDcG from 2003Me01 are listed in comments
149PM cG M,MR$From ce data. The |a(exp) values are derived by the evaluators
149PM2cG from Ice values of 1967Ba27 and I|g data of 1979ScZL assuming 114|g as
149PM3cG standard with |a(K)=0.9086 {I8} deduced from L1/L2 and L1/L3 ratios.
149PM4cG Sign of |d is from |g(|q) (1987Si13) and/or |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01)
149PM cG E$Weighted average of 1979Sc12 and 1968He19. In cases where 1979Sc12
149PM2cG have deduced E|g from level scheme only, the value is given to
149PM3cG 0.1 keV without uncertainty. Values from 1986Ii01 generally agree with
149PM4cG those from 1979Sc12 and 1968He19. No uncertainties are quoted by
149PM5cG 1986Ii01. Values from 2003Me01 are not used in averaging for reasons
149PM6cG quoted above.
149PM cG RI$From 1979Sc12 or 1979ScZL. For absolute intensities of prominent
149PM2cG |g rays (from fission produced source) see 1969Gr32. Values given
149PM3cG by 1969Gr32 agree well with those deduced from the normalization
149PM4cG factor given here. Values from 2003Me01 are not used in averaging for
149PM5cG reasons quoted above.
149PM cG E(A)$From ce date of 1967Ba27
149PM cG RI(B)$From |g|g
149PM cG RI(D)$Doublet, measured energy associated with stronger
149PM2cG component and I|g of both from |g|g
149PM cG E(E)$Observed only in |g|g
149PM cG E(F)$Doublet, seen only in |g|g
149PM cG E(G)$Reported only by 1968He19
149PM cG E(H)$Not reported by 1986Ii01
149PM cG E(J)$From 1986Ii01
149PM cG E(K),RI(K)$|g reported by 1986Ii01 only
149PM cG E(X)$|g not reported by 2003Me01
149PM cG E(d)$Uncertainty was doubled in the least-squares fitting procedure
149PM cG E(Y)$|g from 2003Me01 only; treated as uncertain by the evaluators,
149PM2cG since with the intensity quoted by 2003Me01, this line should have
149PM3cG been seen by 1979Sc12 and 1986Ii01. This |g is not included in the
149PM4cG Adopted Gammas
149PM cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data, assuming |DE|g=0.2 keV,
149PM2cL when not stated. With the quoted uncertainties, 13 |g rays from levels
149PM3cL above 745 keV fitted poorly, with a resultant reduced |h{+2}=4.5 as
149PM4cL compared to critical |h{+2} of 1.3. Uncertainties for such |g rays
149PM5cL were doubled (generally from 0.05 keV to 0.10 keV) in the least-squares
149PM6cL fitting procedure. Exception was 750.63|g from 750-keV level, where
149PM7cL uncertainty was increased to 0.2 keV from the quoted 0.05 keV. With
149PM8cL the adjustment of uncertainties, reduced |h{+2} is 1.6, and only
149PM9cL three |g rays out of a total of 227 |g rays fit somewhat poorly
149PM cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels
149PM cL E(A)$Level proposed by 2003Me01 only is treated as uncertain by the
149PM2cL evaluators, and is not included in the Adopted Levels.
149PM cL E(B)$Level not reported by 1986Ii01
149PM cL E(C)$Level from 1986Ii01 only
149ND P 0.0 5/2- 1.726 H 5 1688.9 25
149ND cP J,T$From {+149}Nd Adopted Levels.
149ND cP QP$From 2021Wa16
149PM N 0.260 8 1.0 1.0
149PM cN NR$from |S(I(|g+ce) of |g rays to g.s.)=100, with no |b{+-} feeding to
149PM2cN the g.s., consistent with results of TAGS data (1997Gr09,1996Gr20)
149PM3cN giving I|b(to g.s.)=2.8 {I44}. If all the unplaced |g intensities were
149PM4cN assumed to feed the g.s., I|g normalization would only be
149PM5cN reduced by 0.12%. 1966He04 report I|g(654|g)=8.4% {I5} from 4|p|b|g
149PM6cN which leads to |S(I(|g+ce) to g.s.)=106% {I8} consistent with
149PM7cN assumption of I|b(g.s.)=0. This value of I|g normalization gives
149PM8cN absolute intensities which are in good agreement with those given by
149PMXcN 1969Gr32 for selected |g rays
149PM PN 3
149PM G 26.394 22 Y
149PM G 33.964 16 Y
149PM G 39.065 9 Y
149PM G 44.341 14 Y
149PM G 58.526 11 5.47 9 Y
149PM2 G %IG=1.42 5$
149PM G 67.20 19 0.17 4 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.044 10$
149PM G 69.510 21 0.25 3 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.065 8$
149PM G 72.753 12 2.30 5 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.597 22$
149PM G 77.097 10 2.35 5 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.610 23$
149PM G 80.305 10 1.74 3 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.452 16$
149PM G 90.12 5 0.199 11 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0517 33$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 515.8 - 425.3. Poor fit (evaluators)
149PM G 91.125 22 G
149PM G 92.89 3 0.216 13 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.056 4$
149PM G 94.88 10 0.16 5 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.042 13$
149PM G 171.17 10 0.124 22 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.032 6$
149PM G 238.611 3 3.432 11 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.891 27$
149PM cG E$probably from background
149PM G 290.374 20 0.243 6 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0631 25$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 651.1-360.1. Poor fit (evaluators)
149PM G 318.2 3 0.033 17 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.009 4$
149PM CG $EG=318.02 12, IG=0.615 18 (2003Me01).
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 556.2 - 240.4. Very poor fit
149PM2cG (evaluators)
149PM G 351.632 3 4.51 6 Y
149PM2 G %IG=1.17 4$
149PM cG E$probably from background
149PM G 538.15 6 G
149PM G 545.5 0.035 K
149PM2 G %IG=0.0091
149PM G 546.5 0.034 K
149PM2 G %IG=0.0088
149PM G 678.1 0.02 K
149PM2 G %IG=0.0052
149PM G 704.07 10 0.013 6 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0034 16$
149PM G 726.822 12 0.154 10 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0400 29$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 1264.3 - 537.98.
149PM2cG Poor fit (evaluators). Also no such line seen in 1979ScZL and 1968He19
149PM G 736.18 11 0.071 16 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.018 4$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 924.1 - 188.7. Poor fit (evaluators)
149PM G 806.10 8 0.097 9 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0252 25$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 1363.9 - 556.2. Poor fit (evaluators)
149PM G 829.35 18 G
149PM G 839.24 5 0.106 8 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0275 22$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 1049.6 - 211.4. Poor fit (evaluators)
149PM G 877.9 3 0.008 6 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0021 16$
149PM G 907.69 7 0.017 3
149PM2 G %IG=0.0044 8$
149PM G 911.3 0.06 K
149PM2 G %IG=0.016
149PM G 933.24 4 0.225 20 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.058 5$
149PM G 938.79 5 0.023 3 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0060 8$
149PM G 971.77 9 0.011 3 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0029 8$
149PM G 1040.7 4 0.021 7 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0055 18$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 1156.97 - 114.35. Very poor fit
149PM2cG (evaluators)
149PM G 1128.56 11 0.012 3 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0031 8$
149PM G 1172.76 19 0.141 17 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.037 5$
149PM cG $Proposed placement (2003Me01): 1411.9 - 240.4. Very poor fit
149PM2cG (evaluators); and |g with this large intensity not reported in
149PM3cG other studies.
149PM G 1202.29 10 0.006 2
149PM2 G %IG=0.0016 5$
149PM CG $EG=1202.1 5, IG=0.008 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1400.95 9 0.038 4 Y
149PM2 G %IG=0.0099 11$
149PM G 1473.8 3 G
149PM L 0.0 7/2+ 53.08 H 9
149PM B 5 LT 7.6 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=631.1 11
149PM CB IB$2.8 {I44} (TAGS data,1997Gr09,1996Gr20)
149PM L 114.313 5 5/2+ 2.53 NS 3
149PM CL E$114.3534 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$weighted average of
149PM2cL 2.54 ns {I7} (|g|g(t),1970Se11); 2.42 ns {I9} (|g|g(t),1969Ta08); 2.55
149PM3cL ns {I5} (|g|g(t),|b|g(t),1968Az04); 2.58 ns {I7} (|gce(t),1967Ba27);
149PM4cL 2.4 ns {I2} (|g|g(t), 1966Go05); 2.52 ns {I4} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01); 2.62
149PM5cL ns {I10} (|b|g(t),1965Fo08). Other: 3.2 ns {I1} (|bce(t),1967Ba27) is
149PM6cL not included in the average
149PM cL $g factor=0.83 {I6} (1970Be67). Others: 0.81 {I3}, 0.77 {I7}
149PM2cL (1970Se11), 1.01 {I12} (1969Ta08), 0.91 {I10} (1966Sv01)
149PM B 6 3 7.4 2 C
149PMS B EAV=581.4 11
149PM cB E$1555 {I10} (1964Go08), 1560 (1966He04), 1500 (1952Ru10,1950Ma05),
149PM2cB 1600 (1946Bo25)
149PM cB IB$7.6 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 6 (1964Go08), 2.71 (2003Me01)
149PM G 114.314 11 74 5 M1+E2 +0.16 2 1.065 15 C
149PM2 G %IG=19.2 8$
149PMS G KC=0.895 13$LC=0.1340 28$MC=0.0288 6
149PMS G NC=0.00647 14$OC=0.000964 19$PC=5.71E-5 8
149PM CG $EG=114.066 11, IG=65.13 7 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$average of 0.180 {I24} from L1/L2=8.5 {I20} and L1/L3=14.5 {I30} and
149PM2cG +0.14 {I5} from A{-2}=0.30 {I4} in |g(|q) (1987Si13)
149PM L 188.631 6 3/2+ 3.27 NS 5
149PM CL E$ 188.6796 17 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$weighted average of
149PM2cL 3.24 ns {I7} (|gce(t),1970Se11); 3.24 ns {I10} (|bce(t),1967Ba27);
149PM3cL 3.46 ns {I14} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01)
149PM cL $g factor=0.72 {I10} (1970Be67), 1.5 {I4} (1970Se11)
149PM B 2.7 LT 7.7 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=549.4 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09)
149PM G 74.32 3 4.3 9 M1+E2 +0.71 6 4.68 14 AC
149PM2 G %IG=1.12 24$
149PMS G KC=2.91 5$LC=1.38 11$MC=0.313 25
149PMS G NC=0.069 6$OC=0.0090 7$PC=0.000168 4
149PM CG $ EG=74.932 4, IG=12.45 10 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from L2/L1=1.6 {I3} and L3/L1=1.5 {I2}. Other: >+0.1
149PM2cG (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01)
149PM G 188.640 8 6.9 3 E2 0.2462 34 C
149PM2 G %IG=1.79 9$
149PMS G NC=0.00267 4$OC=0.000356 5$PC=8.77E-6 12
149PMS G KC=0.1771 25$LC=0.0539 8$MC=0.01214 17
149PM CG $ EG=188.7832 23, IG=6.99 3 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M3/E2)<1 from |a(K)exp=0.22 {I2}, but A{-2}=-0.19 {I8} in
149PM2cG |g(|q) (1987Si13) is consistent with E2
149PM L 211.308 5 5/2+ 80 PS 15
149PM CL E$ 211.3624 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$|bce(t) (1967Ba27). Others: |<0.8 ns (|g|g(t),1965Cu01); |<0.3 ns
149PM2cL (|b|g(t),1965Fo08)
149PM cL $g factor=0.87 {I14} (1970Be67)
149PM B 24.7 16 6.70 3 C
149PMS B EAV=539.7 11
149PM cB E$1450 {I20} (|b|g,1964Go08), 1470 (|b|g,1966He04)
149PM cB IB$23.5 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 20.4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 22.7 0.021 6 [M1] 18.20 25 B
149PM2 G %IG=0.0055 16$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PMS G LC=14.33 20$MC=3.06 4
149PMS G NC=0.690 10$OC=0.1037 15$PC=0.00649 9
149PM cG RI$0.06 (1986Ii01)
149PM cG MR$<1.0 for a non-negative |b feed to 188 level.
149PM G 97.001 12 5.6 4 M1(+E2) +0.09 9 1.696 31 DC
149PM2 G %IG=1.45 11$
149PMS G KC=1.432 20$LC=0.207 18$MC=0.044 4
149PMS G NC=0.0100 9$OC=0.00150 11$PC=9.19E-5 15
149PM CG $ EG=97.354 17, IG=4.414 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also gives -1.3 {I3} but is
149PM2cG inconsistent with <0.14 from |a(K)exp=1.8 {I4} and K/L=8.8 {I22}
149PM G 211.309 7 100 4 M1+E2 -0.41 3 0.1874 27 C
149PM2 G %IG=26.0 10$
149PMS G NC=0.001168 20$OC=0.0001725 27$PC=9.79E-6 16
149PMS G KC=0.1567 23$LC=0.0242 4$MC=0.00521 9
149PM CG $ EG=211.4403 20, IG=100.0 18 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). Others: -0.44 {I10} from A{-2}=-0.35 {I3}
149PM2cG in |g(|q) (1987Si13); 0.39 {I15} from K/L=6.5 {I8}, |a(K)exp=0.146
149PM3cG {I15} and (L1+L2)/L3=15 {I+15-5}
149PM L 240.215 7 11/2- 35 US 3
149PM CL E$ 240.3946 19 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$ce|g(t) (1967Ba27). Other: 41 |ms {I10} (|b|g(t),1966He04)
149PM G 240.220 7 15.2 6 M2 0.664 9
149PM2 G %IG=3.95 19$
149PMS G KC=0.540 8$LC=0.0966 14$MC=0.02126 30
149PMS G NC=0.00480 7$OC=0.0007142 99$PC=4.21E-5 6
149PM CG $ EG=240.4660 18, IG=12.289 22 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=-0.11 {I2} (1989SiZQ)
149PM cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.47 {I4} and K/L=5.2 {I9}
149PM L 270.170 5 7/2- 2.59 NS 2
149PM CL E$ 270.2069 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$weighted average of
149PM2cL 2.55 ns {I7} (|g|g(t),1970Se11); 2.64 ns {I7} (|bce(t),1967Ba27); 2.6
149PM3cL ns {I2} (|g|g(t),1966Go05); 2.58 ns {I4} (|g|g(t),1965Cu01), 2.7 ns
149PM4cL {I2} (|b|g(t),1965Fo08)
149PM cL g factor=0.62 {I3} (1970Be67); 0.98 {I14}, 1.07 {I7}
149PM2cL (1970Se11)
149PM B 17.5 18 6.78 5 C
149PMS B EAV=514.6 11
149PM cB E$1425 {I20} (1964Go08); 1360, 1400 from |b|g (1966He04)
149PM cB IB$16.7 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 38 (1964Go08), 12.2 (2003Me01)
149PM G 30.00 3 0.067 17 (E2) 341 A
149PM2 G %IG=0.017 4$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PMS G LC=265 4$MC=61.0 9
149PMS G NC=13.17 20$OC=1.619 24$PC=0.000551 8
149PM CG $ EG=30.077 26 (2003Me01)
149PM cG |d(E2/M1)>0.7 from L1/L3<0.076 and
149PM2cG L2/L3=0.8 {I+3-2}, but E2 required from level scheme.
149PM G 58.883 20 5.0 8 [E1] 1.110 16 C
149PM2 G %IG=1.30 21$
149PMS G KC=0.925 13$LC=0.1465 21$MC=0.0312 4
149PMS G NC=0.00686 10$OC=0.000949 13$PC=4.22E-5 6
149PM cG E$from 1968He19
149PM CG $ EG=59.652 8, IG=7.66 13 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $(59|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 155.873 9 22.9 8 E1 0.0798 11 DC
149PM2 G %IG=5.95 27$
149PMS G KC=0.0678 9$LC=0.00944 13$MC=0.002005 28
149PMS G NC=0.000447 6$OC=6.49E-5 9$PC=3.53E-6 5
149PM CG $ EG=156.048 3, IG=2.307 5 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=+0.03 {I3} from A{-2}=0.26 {I3} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.059 {I9} gives <0.012
149PM cG $(156|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I1}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1966Go05
149PM G 270.166 7 41.4 11 E1(+M2) -0.07 5 0.021 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=10.8 4$
149PMS G KC=0.0175 33$LC=0.0024 6$MC=0.00052 13
149PMS G NC=0.000116 28$OC=1.7E-5 4$PC=1.00E-6 25
149PM CG $EG=270.2449 16, IG=38.513 11 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from A{-2}=-0.34 {I3} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). Other: <0.05 from
149PM2cG |a(K)exp=0.014 {I2}
149PM L 288.208 8 9/2+
149PM CL E$ 288.2274 21 (2003Me01)
149PM cL J$M1+E2 |g to 7/2+ gives 5/2+,7/2+,9/2+ but 5/2+,7/2+ are excluded
149PM2cL by (366|g)(288|g)(|q) (1986Ii01)
149PM B 0.02 LT 10.5 GT 1U?
149PMS B EAV=510.1 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.025 (2003Me01)
149PM G 288.194 10 2.67 7 M1+E2 +0.78 7 0.0747 14 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.693 28$
149PMS G KC=0.0620 13$LC=0.01001 15$MC=0.002165 33
149PMS G NC=0.000484 7$OC=7.08E-5 10$PC=3.77E-6 10
149PM CG $ EG=288.2516 25, IG=2.331 14 (2003Me01)
149PM cG M$from ce data and |g(|q) in {+150}Nd(p,2n|g)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |d=+1.9 {I2} is also possible from
149PM2cG |g|g(|q). Others: |d=+0.74 {I17} or +2.0 {I6} from A{-2}=-0.71 {I9} in
149PM3cG |g(|q) (1989SiZQ); |a(K)exp=0.062 {I16} is consistent with all |d
149PM L 360.046 9 7/2+
149PM CL E$ 360.139 5 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.2 LT 8.6 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=476.5 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.63 (2003Me01)
149PM G 245.72 5 3.1 8 M1+E2 +0.23 2 0.1255 18 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.81 21$
149PMS G KC=0.1063 15$LC=0.01509 21$MC=0.00323 5
149PMS G NC=0.000726 10$OC=0.0001091 15$PC=6.74E-6 10
149PM CG $ EG=245.847 21, IG=3.618 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $(246|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.02 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I5} (1986Ii01)
149PM cG E$deduced from 245.699 {I8} for doublet (1968He19) and I|g (1979Sc12)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also gives |d>+30 but is
149PM2cG inconsistent with |d<1.1 from |a(K)exp=0.13 {I4}
149PM G 360.052 18 0.59 2 [M1,E2] 0.039 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.153 7$
149PMS G KC=0.032 7$LC=0.00509 27$MC=0.00110 4
149PMS G NC=0.000246 12$OC=3.61E-5 29$PC=1.9E-6 5
149PM CG $ EG=359.889 20, IG=0.593 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=0.7 {I5} (1989SiZQ)
149PM L 387.559 10 1/2+ 0.6 NS 1
149PM CL E$ 387.609 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$|bce(t) (1967Ba27)
149PM B 0.6 LT 8.8 GT 1U?
149PMS B EAV=469.8 10
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.037 (2003Me01)
149PM G 176.27 0.19 4 [E2] 0.310 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 10$
149PM CG $ EG=175.53 8, IG=0.144 4 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PMS G KC=0.2187 31$LC=0.0711 10$MC=0.01605 22
149PMS G NC=0.00352 5$OC=0.000468 7$PC=1.067E-5 15
149PM CG RI$0.05 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 198.928 8 5.37 16 M1(+E2) +0.2 3 0.224 4 DC
149PM2 G %IG=1.39 6$
149PMS G KC=0.190 7$LC=0.0272 28$MC=0.0058 7
149PMS G NC=0.00131 14$OC=0.000196 16$PC=1.21E-5 8
149PM CG $ EG=199.066 5, IG=5.58 5 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from |d=-0.1 to +2.3 (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01) and <0.5 from
149PM2cG |a(K)exp=0.20 {I3} and K/L=8 {I2}
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=0.00 {I3} (1989SiZQ)
149PM cG $(199|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.31 {I6},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=-0.10 {I15} (1986Ii01).
149PM3cG Data are corrected by 1986Ii01 for unresolved components 74.6|g, 75.7|g
149PM cG $(199|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=-0.03 {I2},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=-0.01 {I3} (1986Ii01)
149PM cG $(199|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.095 {I22}, A{-4}=0.0 (1970Se11)
149PM G 273.24 4 0.7 3 [E2] 0.0728 10 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.18 8$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PMS G KC=0.0565 8$LC=0.01283 18$MC=0.00284 4
149PM2 G EKC=0.10 5
149PMS G NC=0.000628 9$OC=8.67E-5 12$PC=3.02E-6 4
149PM L 396.774 7 5/2+
149PM CL E$ 396.8556 23 (2003Me01)
149PM B 3.31 12 7.34 2 C
149PMS B EAV=461.1 11
149PM cB E$1300 (|b(185|g),1966He04)
149PM cB IB$4.3 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 2.19 (2003Me01)
149PM G 36.7 0.07 3 [M1] 4.38 6 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.018 8$
149PMF G FLAG=BH$
149PMS G LC=3.45 5$MC=0.737 10
149PMS G NC=0.1661 23$OC=0.02499 35$PC=0.001567 22
149PM cG MR$<0.56 for a non-negative |b feed to the 360 level.
149PM G 126.630 18 0.43 3 E1 0.1404 20 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.112 8$
149PMS G NC=0.000796 11$OC=0.0001148 16$PC=6.04E-6 8
149PMS G KC=0.1191 17$LC=0.01686 24$MC=0.00358 5
149PM CG $ EG=126.513 17, IG=0.303 23 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.095 from |a(K)exp=0.10 {I7}
149PM G 185.489 25 0.40 2 [M1,E2] 0.267 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.104 6$
149PMS G NC=0.0022 7$OC=0.00031 7$PC=1.20E-5 28
149PMS G KC=0.209 23$LC=0.045 13$MC=0.0099 31
149PM CG $ EG=185.617 9, IG=0.579 12 (2003Me01)
149PM G 208.147 9 9.83 4 M1+E2 +0.17 3 0.1980 28 C
149PM2 G %IG=2.55 8$
149PMS G NC=0.001145 17$OC=0.0001721 25$PC=1.069E-5 16
149PMS G KC=0.1678 24$LC=0.0238 4$MC=0.00508 8
149PM CG $ EG=208.3210 21, IG=10.526 9 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from A{-2}=0.047 {I31} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01)
149PM2cG gives +0.04 {I4} or -3.9 {I7} and |a(K)exp=0.18 {I3} gives <0.9
149PM cG $(208|g)(74|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.00 {I3},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=-0.02 {I7} (1986Ii01). Data are corrected by 1986Ii01 for
149PM3cG unresolved components 74.6|g and 75.7|g
149PM cG $(208|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.00 {I1},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=0.02 {I2} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 282.456 10 2.38 6 M1+E2 +0.65 20 0.0808 30 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.618 24$
149PMS G KC=0.0674 31$LC=0.01055 21$MC=0.00228 5
149PMS G NC=0.000510 11$OC=7.50E-5 11$PC=4.14E-6 26
149PM CG $ EG=282.5292 25, IG=2.071 12 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also allows >+5 or <-11
149PM2cG but is inconsistent with +0.8 {I7} from A{-2}=-0.70 {I11} in |g(|q)
149PM3cG (1987Si13) and <3.5 from |a(K)exp=0.071 {I18}
149PM cG $(282|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.08 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 396.76 4 0.28 1 [M1,E2] 0.030 6 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0727 34$
149PMS G KC=0.025 6$LC=0.00382 33$MC=0.00082 6
149PMS G NC=0.000185 15$OC=2.72E-5 30$PC=1.5E-6 4
149PM CG $ EG=396.878 12, IG=0.298 4 (2003Me01)
149PM L 415.449 9 3/2+
149PM CL E$ 415.559 5 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.16 3 8.6 1
149PMS B EAV=453.2 11
149PM cB IB$0.21 (TAGS,1997Gr09); 0.26 (2003Me01)
149PM G 226.847 19 0.63 2 [M1,E2] 0.145 12 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.164 7$
149PMS G KC=0.117 17$LC=0.022 4$MC=0.0049 9
149PMS G NC=0.00108 19$OC=0.000154 20$PC=6.8E-6 17
149PM CG $ EG=227.072 9, IG=0.544 6 (2003Me01)
149PM G 301.128 14 1.45 4 M1,E2 0.064 10 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.377 15$
149PMS G KC=0.052 10$LC=0.00880 24$MC=0.00191 8
149PMS G NC=0.000427 15$OC=6.19E-5 11$PC=3.1E-6 9
149PM CG $ EG=301.097 9, IG=1.24 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.1 {I3} (1989SiZQ)
149PM cG MR$+0.02 {I11} or +3.1 {I+16-9} from A{-2}=0.15 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I8}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01) for (301|g)(114|g)(|q). |a(K)exp=0.040 {I25} is consistent
149PM3cG with all |d
149PM L 425.276 7 7/2+
149PM CL E$ 425.2798 22 (2003Me01)
149PM cL J$M1+E2 |g to 5/2+ and |g to 9/2+ give 5/2+,7/2+ but
149PM2cL (229|g)(214|g)(|q) excludes 5/2+ (1986Ii01)
149PM B 0.61 9 8.1 1
149PMS B EAV=449.1 11
149PM cB IB$0.78 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.20 (2003Me01)
149PM G 65.23 0.06 2 [M1,E2] 8.2 29 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.016 5$
149PM CG $ EG=65.792 8, IG=0.34 4 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PMS G KC=3.9 6$LC=3.3 27$MC=0.8 6
149PMS G NC=0.17 14$OC=0.021 17$PC=2.2E-4 7
149PM G 137.05 3 0.24 2 [M1,E2] 0.69 5 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.062 6$
149PMS G KC=0.506 32$LC=0.14 7$MC=0.031 15
149PMS G NC=0.0069 33$OC=9.E-4 4$PC=2.8E-5 6
149PM CG $ EG=137.288 20, IG=0.514 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 155.1 0.13 6 [E1] 0.0808 11
149PM2 G %IG=0.034 16$
149PM CG $ EG=154.74 6, IG=0.45 3 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=DH$
149PMS G KC=0.0687 10$LC=0.00957 13$MC=0.002033 28
149PMS G NC=0.000453 6$OC=6.58E-5 9$PC=3.58E-6 5
149PM G 213.947 16 1.54 10 M1,E2 0.173 12 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.400 29$
149PMS G KC=0.138 19$LC=0.027 5$MC=0.0060 13
149PMS G NC=0.00133 28$OC=0.000188 30$PC=8.1E-6 20
149PM CG $ EG=213.9414 20, IG=1.159 7 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$+0.34 {I5} or +8 {I+4-2} from (230|g)(214|g)(|q) (1986Ii01).
149PM2cG |a(K)exp=0.15 {I5} is consistent with all |d
149PM G 310.979 13 1.97 5 M1+E2 +0.23 12 0.0667 15 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.512 20$
149PMS G KC=0.0566 14$LC=0.00790 11$MC=0.001686 24
149PMS G NC=0.000380 5$OC=5.72E-5 8$PC=3.59E-6 11
149PM CG $ EG=311.059 3, IG=1.76 3 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |g|g(|q) also allows +2.6 {I9} but is
149PM2cG inconsistent with |d=+0.22 {I13} or >8 from A{-2}=-0.08 {I11} in |g(|q)
149PM3cG (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.047 {I11} is consistent with all |d
149PM cG $(311|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.06 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 425.22 3 1.05 4 [M1,E2] 0.025 5 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.273 13$
149PMS G KC=0.021 5$LC=0.00313 34$MC=0.00067 7
149PMS G NC=0.000151 16$OC=2.23E-5 29$PC=1.3E-6 4
149PM CG $ EG=425.86 11, IG=2.55 3 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$0.68 (1986Ii01)
149PM L 462.191 10 3/2-
149PM CL E$ 462.349 3 (2003Me01)
149PM B 1.2 3 7.7 1
149PMS B EAV=433.7 11
149PM cB IB$1.6 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.13 (2003Me01)
149PM G 65.42 0.12 4 [E1] 0.840 12 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.031 10$
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PMS G KC=0.703 10$LC=0.1088 15$MC=0.02317 32
149PMS G NC=0.00510 7$OC=0.000710 10$PC=3.25E-5 5
149PM cG E$other: 65.356 {I24} (1968He19) for doublet.
149PM G 74.66 10 3.8 6 E1 0.590 9 AC
149PM2 G %IG=0.99 16$
149PMS G KC=0.495 7$LC=0.0748 11$MC=0.01593 23
149PMS G NC=0.00351 5$OC=0.000494 7$PC=2.334E-5 34
149PM CG $ EG=74.932 4, IG=12.45 10 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.09 from |a(K)exp=0.5 {I3}
149PM G 192.026 9 2.20 7 E2 0.2318 32 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.571 25$
149PMS G KC=0.1675 23$LC=0.0502 7$MC=0.01129 16
149PMS G NC=0.002480 35$OC=0.000332 5$PC=8.33E-6 12
149PM CG $ EG=192.171 3, IG=2.207 15 (2003Me01)
149PM cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I2} and A{-2}=-0.42 {I17} in |g(|q) (1987Si13)
149PM cG $(192|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=0.145 {I30},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01). Assuming A{-2}=0.204, A{-4}=0.0
149PM3cG for 3/2-(E2)7/2-(E1)7/2+ cascade, G{-2}=0.71 {I15}
149PM G 250.826 31 0.13 1 [E1] 0.0223931 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0338 28$
149PMS G KC=0.01911 27$LC=0.00259 4$MC=0.000550 8
149PMS G NC=0.0001229 17$OC=1.813E-5 25$PC=1.048E-6 15
149PM CG $ EG=250.82 3, IG=0.106 27 (2003Me01)
149PM G 273.5 0.32 15[E1] 0.0178925 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.08 4$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PMS G KC=0.01528 21$LC=0.002063 29$MC=0.000438 6
149PMS G NC=9.79E-5 14$OC=1.447E-5 20$PC=8.44E-7 12
149PM L 515.645 9 (9/2)-
149PM CL E$ 515.796 4 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.15 LT 8.5 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=411.5 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.45 (2003Me01)
149PM G 245.5 0.8 4 [M1,E2] 0.115 12 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.21 10$
149PMS G KC=0.093 15$LC=0.0170 21$MC=0.0037 5
149PMS G NC=0.00083 11$OC=0.000119 10$PC=5.5E-6 14
149PM CG $ EG=244.89 15, IG=0.36 12 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$-0.16 {I24} or -5 {I2} from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01)
149PM cG $(245|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I15}, A{-4}=0.02 {I21} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 275.437 11 2.51 6 M1(+E2) 0.082 11 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.652 25$
149PMS G KC=0.067 12$LC=0.0117 8$MC=0.00254 22
149PMS G NC=0.00057 4$OC=8.18E-5 27$PC=4.0E-6 11
149PM CG $ EG=275.469 5, IG=1.529 8 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=0.7 {I3} (1989SiZQ), probably includes 277.0|g also
149PM cG MR$+0.23 {I23}, >+2.4 or <-15 from |g|g(|q) (1986Ii01). |a(K)exp=0.071
149PM2cG {I21} is consistent with all |d. |g(|q) in (p,2n|g) forbids pure E2
149PM G 515.75 9 0.14 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.036 5$
149PM CG $ EG=515.26 19, IG=0.511 14 (2003Me01)
149PM L 537.863 6 5/2- 50 PS LE
149PM CL E$ 537.9789 20 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$|bce(t) (1967Ba27). Other: |<0.5 ns (|b|g(t),1965Cu01)
149PM B 21.5 9 6.35 2 C
149PMS B EAV=402.4 11
149PM cB E$1130 {I20} (1964Go08); 1100, 1120, 1130 (|b|g,1966He04), 1100
149PM2cB (1952Ru10)
149PM cB IB$20.6 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 26 (1964Go08), 23.8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 75.69 6 0.88 8 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 4.0 6 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.229 22$
149PMS G KC=2.84 10$LC=0.9 5$MC=0.21 12
149PMS G NC=0.045 25$OC=0.0061 31$PC=0.000172 17
149PM cG MR$from |a(K)exp=4.0 {I12}
149PM G 112.52 4 0.46 6 [E1] 0.1939 27 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.119 16$
149PMS G KC=0.1641 23$LC=0.02349 33$MC=0.00499 7
149PMS G NC=0.001108 16$OC=0.0001590 22$PC=8.20E-6 11
149PM G 122.415 13 0.99 6 E1 0.1540 22 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.257 17$
149PMS G KC=0.1305 18$LC=0.01854 26$MC=0.00394 6
149PMS G NC=0.000875 12$OC=0.0001260 18$PC=6.59E-6 9
149PM CG $ EG=122.689 8, IG=0.826 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.1 from |a(K)exp=0.15 {I4}
149PM G 141.06 7 0.15 1 [E1] 0.1046 15 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0390 29$
149PMS G KC=0.0888 12$LC=0.01247 18$MC=0.00265 4
149PMS G NC=0.000589 8$OC=8.53E-5 12$PC=4.57E-6 6
149PM CG $ EG=140.93 5, IG=0.50 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 177.818 18 0.60 6 E1 0.0558 8 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.156 16$
149PMS G KC=0.0475 7$LC=0.00656 9$MC=0.001393 20
149PMS G NC=0.000311 4$OC=4.54E-5 6$PC=2.515E-6 35
149PM CG $ EG=177.905 13, IG=0.59 5 (2003Me01)
149PM cG M$|a(K)exp<0.07
149PM G 267.693 8 23.3 6 M1+E2 +0.24 7 0.0994 16 C
149PM2 G %IG=6.05 24$
149PMS G NC=0.000573 9$OC=8.61E-5 12$PC=5.34E-6 11
149PMS G KC=0.0843 15$LC=0.01191 18$MC=0.00255 4
149PM CG $ EG=267.7873 16, IG=21.811 8 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$average of |d=+0.20 {I8} (|g|g(|q),1986Ii01) and +0.28 {I7}
149PM2cG (|g(|q,H,t), 1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.076 {I8} and K/L=7.5 {I12} give 0.5
149PM3cG {I3}
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=0.50 {I7} (1987Si13,1989SiZQ)
149PM cG $(268|g)(156|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.25 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I2}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01). Others: A{-2}=0.173 {I12}, A{-4}=0.00 (1970Se11);
149PM3cG A{-2}=-0.142 {I9}, A{-4}=0.020 {I11} (1970Be67)
149PM cG $(268|g)(270|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I1}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1970Be67, 1966Sv01, 1966Go05, 1965Ch09
149PM G 326.554 10 17.6 4 E1(+M2) -0.07 6 0.0125 27 C
149PM2 G %IG=4.57 17$
149PMS G KC=0.0107 22$LC=0.0015 4$MC=3.1E-4 8
149PMS G NC=7.0E-5 18$OC=1.03E-5 28$PC=6.2E-7 17
149PM CG $ EG=326.6331 17, IG=16.589 16 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from A{-2}=-0.36 {I6} in |g(|q) (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.011 {I3}
149PM2cG gives <0.14
149PM cG $(327|g)(97|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I6} (1986Ii01)
149PM cG $(326|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.14 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01). Others: A{-2}=0.109 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I10} (1966Go05);
149PM3cG A{-2}=-0.230 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.007 {I9} (1970Be67)
149PM G 349.231 9 5.31 14E1 0.0096614 C
149PM2 G %IG=1.38 6$
149PMS G KC=0.00826 12$LC=0.001103 15$MC=0.0002338 33
149PMS G NC=5.24E-5 7$OC=7.78E-6 11$PC=4.65E-7 7
149PM CG $EG=349.365 4, IG=8.540 10 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=+0.04 {I4} from A{-2}=0.29 {I4} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.017 {I5} gives <0.3
149PM cG $(349|g)(189|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.032 {I7}, A{-4}=0.007 {I15} (1970Be67)
149PM G 423.553 10 28.7 15E1 0.00606 8 C
149PM2 G %IG=7.5 4$
149PMS G KC=0.00519 7$LC=0.000687 10$MC=0.0001455 20
149PMS G NC=3.26E-5 5$OC=4.86E-6 7$PC=2.95E-7 4
149PM CG $EG=423.5600 20, IG=25.25 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=-0.03 {I9} from A{-2}=-0.40 {I5} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13). |a(K)exp=0.0065 {I16} gives <0.17
149PM cG $(423|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}G{-2}=-0.103 {I10},
149PM2cG A{-4}G{-4}=-0.02 {I2} (1986Ii01).
149PM2cG G{-2}=0.76 {I8} (1986Ii01) was obtained assuming A{-2}=-0.135 {I7}
149PM3cG (average A{-2} from 1970Se11,1970Be67,1966Sv01 and 1966Go05)
149PM L 547.126 13 (5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 547.076 6 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.14 LT 8.5 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=398.6 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.25 (2003Me01)
149PM G 131.7 0.017 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.00441 13$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 276.960 17 1.32 4 [D,E2] 0.055 38 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.343 15$
149PM CG $ EG=276.89 8, IG=1.009 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 358.49 10 0.04 2 HC
149PM2 G %IG=0.010 5$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 432.66 0.05 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.013 5$
149PM CG $ EG=432.76 7, IG=0.014 4 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EJ$
149PM G 547.1 0.06 3 FC
149PM2 G %IG=0.016 8$
149PM CG $ EG=546.22 24, IG=0.385 13 (2003Me01)
149PM L 558.15 5 (9/2)+
149PM CL E$ 556.233 4; 9/2+ (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.02 LT 9.3 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=394.0 11
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.70 (2003Me01)
149PM G 198.00 0.19 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 5$
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PM CG $ EG=197.75 8, IG=0.31 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 287.7 0.05 2 [E1] 0.0157222 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.013 5$
149PMS G KC=0.01342 19$LC=0.001808 25$MC=0.000384 5
149PMS G NC=8.58E-5 12$OC=1.270E-5 18$PC=7.45E-7 10
149PM CG $EG=286.034, IG=1.531 13 (2003Me01); probably an impurity line
149PM2CG (evaluators)
149PM G 443.7 0.04 X?
149PM2 G %IG=0.01039 31$
149PM cG RI$from 1986Ii01
149PM G 558.0 0.04 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.01039 31$
149PM cG RI$from 1986Ii01. I|g=0.29 {I10} (1979Sc12)
149PM L 637.43 20 A ?
149PM CL E$ 635.983 25; (3/2+,5/2+) (2003Me01)
149PM cL E$635.97|g proposed from this level by
149PM2cL 2003Me01 is a very poor fit. See comment for 635.7|g from 923.9 level
149PM B 0.01 LT 9.5 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=361.7 11
149PM G 448.80 20 0.031 15 HC ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.008 4$
149PM cG $Placement from 2003Me01. Poor fit. Level-energy difference=447.88
149PM CG $ EG=448.82 9, IG=0.038 15 (2003Me01)
149PM L 651.021 18 (5/2+)
149PM CL E$ 651.132 6 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.30 5 8.0 1
149PMS B EAV=356.2 11
149PM cB IB$0.27 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.12 (2003Me01)
149PM G 188.8 0.04 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.010
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 254.228 22 0.33 1 [M1+E2] 0.104 12 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.086 4$
149PMS G KC=0.084 14$LC=0.0152 16$MC=0.0033 4
149PMS G NC=0.00074 9$OC=0.000106 7$PC=5.0E-6 13
149PM CG $ EG=254.783 15, IG=0.369 12 (2003Me01)
149PM G 263.4 0.09 [E2] 0.0819 11 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.023
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PMS G KC=0.0631 9$LC=0.01470 21$MC=0.00326 5
149PMS G NC=0.000721 10$OC=9.92E-5 14$PC=3.35E-6 5
149PM G 380.66 5 0.20 1 [E1] 0.0078211 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0519 30$
149PMF G FL=270.170
149PMS G KC=0.00669 9$LC=0.000890 12$MC=0.0001887 26
149PMS G NC=4.23E-5 6$OC=6.29E-6 9$PC=3.79E-7 5
149PM CG $ EG=380.962 22, IG=0.163 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$others: 380.79 (1986Ii01), 380.93 {I7} (1968He19)
149PM G 439.6 0.14 6 BC
149PM2 G %IG=0.036 16$
149PM CG $EG=439.11 7, IG=0.145 14 (2003Me01)
149PM G 462.34 10 0.16 8 HC
149PM2 G %IG=0.042 21$
149PM CG $EG=462.354 9, IG=0.81 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 536.6 0.18 8 BC
149PM2 G %IG=0.047 21$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 651.0 0.24 10 BC
149PM2 G %IG=0.062 26$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM cG RI$0.051 (1986Ii01)
149PM L 654.843 5 7/2- 0.18 NS LE
149PM CL E$654.9478 23 (2003Me01)
149PM cL T$|b|g(t) (1965Cu01,1966He04)
149PM B 19.3 8 6.22 2 C
149PMS B EAV=354.6 11
149PM cB E$1025 {I20} (1964Go08); 1000, 1020 (|b|g,1966He04)
149PM cB IB$17.2 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 30 (1964Go08), 23.9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 96.9 0.13 5 [E1] 0.291 4 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.034 13$
149PMS G KC=0.2460 34$LC=0.0358 5$MC=0.00761 11
149PMS G NC=0.001685 24$OC=0.0002403 34$PC=1.203E-5 17
149PM CG $ EG=96.3 3, IG=0.18 11 (2003Me01)
149PM G 107.79 3 0.33 6 [D,E2] 1.0 8 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.086 16$
149PM CG $ EG=108.189 14, IG=0.54 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 116.930 24 0.42 12 M1+E2 0.5 +11-3 1.05 16 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.109 31$
149PMS G KC=0.83 4$LC=0.18 15$MC=0.04 4
149PMS G NC=0.009 8$OC=0.0012 9$PC=5.0E-5 10
149PM CG $ EG=117.088 8, IG=0.809 7 (2003Me01)
149PM cG MR$from K/L=4.5 {I2} and |a(K)exp=0.8 {I3}
149PM G 139.210 12 1.96 9 (M1+E2) +3 3 0.69 9 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.509 28$
149PMS G NC=0.009 5$OC=0.0012 7$PC=2.2E-5 11
149PMS G KC=0.46 6$LC=0.18 11$MC=0.041 26
149PM CG $ EG=139.357 7, IG=2.33 8 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $ce(K) not reported by 1967Ba27 although peak should have
149PM2cG been prominent in the electron spectrum. K conversion line reported by
149PM3cG 1966He04 but no intensity given.
149PM cG MR$from A{-2}=0.34 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I11} for (139|g)(245|g)(|q) and
149PM2cG A{-2}=0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} for (139|g)(275|g)(|q) (1986Ii01)
149PM G 229.566 9 1.86 5 E1 0.0282 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.483 20$
149PMS G KC=0.02409 34$LC=0.00328 5$MC=0.000696 10
149PMS G NC=0.0001555 22$OC=2.289E-5 32$PC=1.310E-6 18
149PM CG $ EG=229.630 3, IG=1.771 9 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=+0.06 to +1.1 from A{-2}=-0.74 {I15} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13); <0.14 from |a(K)exp=0.024 {I14}
149PM cG $(230|g)(214|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I5} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 258.067 13 1.45 4 E1 0.0207929 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.377 15$
149PMS G KC=0.01775 25$LC=0.002403 34$MC=0.000510 7
149PMS G NC=0.0001140 16$OC=1.683E-5 24$PC=9.75E-7 14
149PM CG $ EG=258.144 3, IG=1.573 20 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.26 from |a(K)exp<0.046
149PM cG $(258|g)(208|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.04 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 294.802 10 2.20 6 E1 0.0147721 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.571 23$
149PMS G NC=8.06E-5 11$OC=1.193E-5 17$PC=7.01E-7 10
149PMS G KC=0.01262 18$LC=0.001697 24$MC=0.000360 5
149PM CG $ EG=294.969 7, IG=3.33 7 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=-0.11 {I22} from A{-2}=-0.34 {I9} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13), <0.26 from |a(K)exp<0.03
149PM cG $(295|g)(245|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 366.634 14 2.09 6 E1 0.0085712 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.543 23$
149PMS G KC=0.00733 10$LC=0.000977 14$MC=0.0002070 29
149PMS G NC=4.64E-5 6$OC=6.90E-6 10$PC=4.14E-7 6
149PM CG $ EG=366.682 3, IG=1.858 17 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=-0.04 {I11} from A{-2}=0.09 {I8} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13); <0.31 from |a(K)exp<0.021. |a(K)exp also gives E2 but
149PM3cG inconsistent with |g(|q) data
149PM cG $(367|g)(288|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 384.687 16 1.03 3 [M1,E2] 0.032 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.267 11$
149PMS G KC=0.027 6$LC=0.00419 32$MC=0.00090 6
149PMS G NC=0.000202 14$OC=2.97E-5 30$PC=1.6E-6 5
149PM CG $ EG=384.703 4, IG=0.937 5 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.24 {I18} (1989SiZQ)
149PM G 443.551 11 4.44 20E1 0.00543 8 DC
149PM2 G %IG=1.15 6$
149PMS G KC=0.00466 7$LC=0.000615 9$MC=0.0001302 18
149PMS G NC=2.92E-5 4$OC=4.36E-6 6$PC=2.66E-7 4
149PM CG $ EG=443.550 3, IG=4.221 25 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.17 from |a(K)exp<0.007
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=0.35 {I6} (1989SiZQ)
149PM cG $(444|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.083 {I25}, A{-4}=0.11 {I20} (1970Be67)
149PM G 540.509 10 25.4 9 E1 0.00346 5 C
149PM2 G %IG=6.60 31$
149PMS G KC=0.00297 4$LC=0.000389 5$MC=8.22E-5 12
149PMS G NC=1.846E-5 26$OC=2.76E-6 4$PC=1.710E-7 24
149PM CG $ EG=540.513 26, IG=23.911 16 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)=-0.23 {I28} from A{-2}=0.370 {I25} in |g(|q)
149PM2cG (1987Si13); <0.24 from |a(K)exp=0.0038 {I16}
149PM cG $(540|g)(114|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1}
149PM2cG (1986Ii01). Others: 1970Se11, 1970Be67, 1966Sv01, 1966Go05
149PM G 654.831 13 30.7 15 E1 2.28E-3 3 C
149PM2 G %IG=8.0 4$
149PMS G KC=0.001960 27$LC=0.000254 4$MC=5.38E-5 8
149PMS G NC=1.209E-5 17$OC=1.815E-6 25$PC=1.137E-7 16
149PM CG $ EG=654.838 3, IG=27.608 22 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.2 from |a(K)exp=0.0022 {I6}
149PM cG $|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.436 used to determine orientation parameter |b{-2}
149PM L 721.23 11 7/2+ ?
149PM CL E$ 721.93 3 (2003Me01)
149PM cL E$from 1979ScZL, not given in 1979Sc12 and 1986Ii01
149PM B 0.01 LT 9.4 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=327.9 10
149PM cB IB$0 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.167 (2003Me01)
149PM G 361.4 0.025 10 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0065 26$
149PM CG $ EG=361.76 3, IG=0.514 13 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM G 606.67 16 0.04 2 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.010 5$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM L 744.579 13 (3/2,5/2+)
149PM CL E$ 744.575 6 (2003Me01)
149PM B 1.11 5 7.32 2 C
149PMS B EAV=318.6 10
149PM cB E$920 (|b|g,1966He04), 950 (1952Ru10)
149PM cB IB$1.16 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.98 (2003Me01)
149PM G 197.4 0.05 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0130 4$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 282.4 0.065 25 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.017 7$
149PM CG $ EG=281.958 14, IG=0.688 21 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=HD$
149PM G 329.18 0.08 4 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.021 10$
149PMF G FLAG=EJ$
149PM cG RI$0.007 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 347.843 18 0.62 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.161 7$
149PM CG $ EG=347.654 19, IG=2.38 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 357.03 4 0.18 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0467 30$
149PM CG $ EG=357.111 22, IG=0.282 14 (2003Me01)
149PM G 533.20 4 0.35 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.091 6$
149PM CG $ EG=533.130 17, IG=0.267 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 555.88 9 2.26 12 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.59 4$
149PM CG $ EG=555.77 3, IG=1.77 13 (2003Me01)
149PM cG M$1967Ba27 give |a(K)exp<0.026 for the 555.88+556.83
149PM2cG doublet which allows E1, E2 or M1 for either or both transitions.
149PM cG E$1968He19 give 556.43 {I5} as average energy for this doublet.
149PM cG $|g(|q) for doublet: A{-2}U{-2}B{-2}=-0.13 {I2} (1989SiZQ)
149PM cG $(556|g)(211|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=0.02 {I4} (1986Ii01)
149PM G 630.237 19 0.73 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.190 6$
149PM CG $ EG=630.225 9, IG=0.601 12 (2003Me01)
149PM L 750.41 5 (7/2-,9/2+)
149PM CL E$ 750.491 15; 7/2- (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.08 2 8.5 1
149PMS B EAV=316.3 10
149PM cB IB$0.074 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.34 (2003Me01)
149PM G 480.32 5 0.16 1 dC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0416 29$
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=480.24
149PM CG $ EG=480.48 3, IG=0.129 15 (2003Me01)
149PM G 510.30 5 0.24 6 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.062 16$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=510.19
149PM G 636.2 0.20 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.052 11$
149PM CG $ EG=634.87 5, IG=1.065 10 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PM cG E$other: 635.482 {I25} (1968He19) for doublet
149PM G 749.63 5 0.052 6 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0135 16$
149PMF G FL=0.0
149PM CG $ EG=750.15 14, IG=0.12 9 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$poor fit; level-energy difference=750.41; |g|g from 2003Me01.
149PM2cG Uncertainty was increased to 0.2 keV in the least-squares fitting
149PM3cG procedure
149PM L 758.67 7 (5/2+,7/2,9/2+) B
149PM CL E$ 758.075 19 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.036 8 8.8 1
149PMS B EAV=313.0 10
149PM cB IB$0.038 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.24 (2003Me01)
149PM G 470.5 0.04 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.010 5$
149PM CG $ EG=469.706 20, IG=0.049 3 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM G 547.4 0.04 2 FC
149PM2 G %IG=0.010 5$
149PM CG $ EG=548.7 4, IG=0.34 8 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$probably same as 548.3 in 1986Ii01
149PM G 758.65 8 0.060 6 &
149PM2 G %IG=0.0156 16$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM CG $ EG=759.13 8, IG=0.30 16 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $Placed from 872 level by 1986Ii01
149PM L 768.188 17 (5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 767.482 12; (5/2,7/2+) (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.66 6 7.51 4
149PMS B EAV=309.28 99
149PM cB IB$0.69 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.08 (2003Me01)
149PM G 342.81 10 0.32 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.083 18$
149PM CG $ EG=343.12 5, IG=0.14 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$0.14 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 352.78 3 0.21 1 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0545 31$
149PM G 498.06 0.04 1 JC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0104 26$
149PM CG $ EG=498.06 7, IG=0.119 25 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$other: 498.03 {I8} (1968He19) for a doublet
149PM cG RI$from |g|g (1979Sc12)
149PM G 556.83 9 1.68 20 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.44 5$
149PM CG $ EG=556.71 4, IG=2.39 9 (2003Me01)
149PM cG $See comment for 555.88|g
149PM G 653.9 0.07 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0182 5$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 768.172 21 0.23 2
149PM2 G %IG=0.060 5$
149PM CG $ EG=767.793 13, IG=0.338 8 (2003Me01)
149PM L 786.72 3(3/2+,5/2+)
149PM CL E$ 785.86 3 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.074 8 8.42 5
149PMS B EAV=301.96 99
149PM cB IB$0.077 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.049 (2003Me01)
149PM G 239.6 0.05 KC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0130 4$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 399.1 0.056 22 EC
149PM2 G %IG=0.015 6$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 575.4 3 0.03 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0078 26$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 598.06 5 0.11 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0286 27$
149PM CG $ EG=598.01 4, IG=0.065 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 786.73 4 0.039 5
149PM2 G %IG=0.0101 13$
149PM CG $ EG=785.20 3, IG=0.070 4 (2003Me01)
149PM L 872.94 8 C ?
149PM B 0.028 6 8.7 1
149PMS B EAV=268.33 97
149PM cB IB$0.031 (TAGS,1997Gr09)
149PM G 512.7 0.05 2 &C
149PM2 G %IG=0.013 5$
149PM cG $Placement from 1986Ii01 only
149PM G 758.65 8 0.060 6 &C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0156 16$
149PM L 884.89 7 (5/2+) B
149PM CL E$ 885.82 14 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.011 3 9.1 1
149PMS B EAV=263.72 97
149PM cB IB$0.012 (TAGS,1997Gr09)
149PM dB IB$ 0.015 (2003Me01)
149PM G 673.58 7 0.042 10 HC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0109 26$
149PM CG $ EG=674.38 14, IG=0.040 5 (2003Me01)
149PM L 923.886 18 (5/2+,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 924.05 21 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.30 2 7.56 3
149PMS B EAV=248.78 96
149PM cB IB$0.33 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.24 (2003Me01)
149PM G 498.62 0.14 1 JC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0364 28$
149PM CG $ EG=499.44 13, IG=0.079 12 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$from |g|g (1979Sc12)
149PM G 563.8 0.036 16 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.009 4$
149PM G 635.7 0.26 5 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.068 13$
149PM CG $ EG=635.97 4, IG=0.129 12 (2003Me01) PLACED FROM A 635.98 LEVEL
149PM cG $See comment for 636.2|g
149PM G 712.59 3 0.27 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.070 6$
149PM CG $ EG=712.542 19, IG=0.243 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 809.6 0.06 JC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0156 5$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM cG RI$from 1986Ii01
149PM cG E$other: 810.54 {I20} (1968He19) fits poorly
149PM G 923.874 23 0.39 3
149PM2 G %IG=0.101 8$
149PM CG $ EG=924.21 10, IG=0.254 16 (2003Me01)
149PM L 942.926 22 (3/2+,5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 942.505 20 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.081 10 8.09 6
149PMS B EAV=241.54 95
149PM cB IB$0.088 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.57 (2003Me01)
149PM G 527.6 0.045 12 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0117 31$
149PM CG $ EG=527.2 3, IG=0.168 11 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM G 582.9 0.07 3 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.018 8$
149PM CG $ EG=582.144 21, IG=0.626 19 (2003Me01)
149PM G 754.291 21 0.15 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0390 29$
149PM CG $ EG=754.43 5, IG=0.36 18 (2003Me01)
149PM G 828.6 0.033 8 EC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0086 21$
149PM CG $ EG=829.81 14, IG=0.071 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 942.97 17 0.012 4 H
149PM2 G %IG=0.0031 10$
149PM CG $ EG=943.18 21, IG=0.030 13 (2003Me01)
149PM L 956.87 7 A ?
149PM CL E$ 956.83 7; 7/2+ (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.01 LT 9.0 GT ?
149PMS B EAV=236.26 95
149PM G 441.47 13 0.122 10 YC ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0317 28$
149PM L 1031.68 3(7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 1031.75 4 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.10 1 7.81 5
149PMS B EAV=208.31 93
149PM cB IB$0.19 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.090 (2003Me01)
149PM G 376.9 0.030 15 [E1] 0.0080111 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.008 4$
149PM CG $ EG=376.69 10, IG=0.043 11 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PMS G KC=0.00686 10$LC=0.000912 13$MC=0.0001934 27
149PMS G NC=4.33E-5 6$OC=6.45E-6 9$PC=3.88E-7 5
149PM G 493.85 5 0.23 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.060 5$
149PM CG $ EG=493.87 15, IG=0.18 6 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$0.11 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 671.56 10 0.040 15 BC
149PM2 G %IG=0.010 4$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 743.5 4 0.010 4 HC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0026 10$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 761.46 5 0.11 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0286 27$
149PM CG $ EG=762.27 6, IG=0.070 5 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1031.77 8 0.017 5 B
149PM2 G %IG=0.0044 13$
149PM CG $ EG=1031.40 21, IG=0.028 7 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1043.39 5 (3/2+,5/2,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1043.69 20 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.036 5 8.22 6
149PMS B EAV=203.99 92
149PM cB IB$0.068 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.019 (2003Me01)
149PM G 617.9 0.029 10 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0075 26$
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM G 832.09 5 0.09 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0234 27$
149PM CG $ EG=832.25 20, IG=0.051 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 929.2 0.04 LT KC
149PM2 G %IG<0.010
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM L 1050.18 3
149PM CL E$ 1049.655 24; (1/2+,3/2,5/2+) (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.022 2 8.42 4
149PMS B EAV=201.49 92
149PM cB IB$0.036 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.16 (2003Me01)
149PM G 413.69 3 0.067 5 YC ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0174 14$
149PMF G FL=637.43
149PM cG E$uncertainty of 0.015 increased to 0.03 (evaluators)
149PM G 861.54 3 0.068 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0177 19$
149PM CG $ EG=860.21 3, IG=0.264 19 (2003Me01)
149PM G 935.90 6 0.018 3 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0047 8$
149PM cG E$936.67 (1986Ii01)
149PM L 1141.528 18 5/2+
149PM CL E$ 1141.67 4 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.086 6 7.60 4
149PMS B EAV=168.47 89
149PM cB IB$0.15 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.052 (2003Me01)
149PM G 390.9 0.03 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0078 26$
149PM CG $ EG=390.65 16, IG=0.021 3 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=391.1
149PM G 594.40 5 0.11 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0286 27$
149PM CG $ EG=594.54 5, IG=0.047 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 781.40 6 0.015 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 10$
149PM CG $ EG=781.32 10, IG=0.020 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 871.375 23 0.13 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0338 28$
149PM CG $ EG=871.45 6, IG=0.043 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1027.18 4 0.034 6 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0088 16$
149PM CG $ EG=1027.6 3, IG=0.012 5 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1141.77 160.010 4 &
149PM2 G %IG=0.0026 10$
149PMF G FLAG=Xd
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=1141.53
149PM cG $Placement from 1986Ii01
149PM L 1156.034 24 (3/2+,5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 1156.971 8 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.031 2 8.00 3
149PMS B EAV=163.33 89
149PM cB IB$0.055 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.44 (2003Me01)
149PM G 434.90 7 0.014 4 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0036 10$
149PM G 740.57 3 0.055 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0143 5$
149PM CG $ EG=740.66 7, IG=0.083 16 (2003Me01)
149PM G 795.93 9 0.027 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0070 11$
149PM CG $ EG=794.58 3, IG=0.328 18 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$796.64 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 967.43 4 0.032 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0083 11$
149PM CG $ EG=968.372 8, IG=0.799 12 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$968.28 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 1156.3 4 0.004 2 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0010 5$
149PM L 1181.30 7 A ?
149PM cL J$(3/2+,5/2+) (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.094 5 7.45 3 ?
149PMS B EAV=154.44 88
149PM cB IB$0.11 (2003Me01)
149PM G 224.49 6 0.092 9 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0239 24$
149PM G 665.22 7 0.059 4 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0153 11$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=665.65
149PMF G FL=515.645
149PM G 992.83 6 0.057 6 H ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0148 16$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG $Placement from 2003Me01
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=992.66
149PM CG $ EG=992.08 27, IG=0.013 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1180.5 3 0.153 11 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0397 31$
149PM L 1190.274 17 (5/2)
149PM CL E$ 1190.728 7 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.16 1 7.19 3
149PMS B EAV=151.30 88
149PM cB IB$0.14 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.06 (2003Me01)
149PM G 652.74 YC ?
149PM cG E,RI$2003Me01 quote E|g=652.744 {I7}, I|g=2.646 {I15}. There is no
149PM2cG evidence of such a strong line in the spectra of 1979ScZL and
149PM3cG 1968He19. This line is probably mainly from background or impurity.
149PM4cG There is some |g|g coin evidence of this line in table 2 of 2003Me01.
149PM G 727.88 5 0.063 7 dC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0164 19$
149PM CG $ EG=727.23 3, IG=0.255 24 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=728.08
149PMF G FL=462.191
149PM G 765.1 0.029 7 EC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0075 18$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 774.6 0.012 5 EC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0031 13$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM cG $E|g=775.97 {I15}, I|g=0.013 {I3} (2003Me01) placed from 1412 level
149PM G 793.43 3 0.087 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0226 19$
149PM CG $ EG=793.19 3, IG=0.163 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 920.3 2 0.015 6 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 16$
149PM G 979.013 23 0.30 4 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.078 11$
149PM CG $ EG=979.52 22, IG=0.12 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1075.95 4 0.08 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0208 27$
149PM CG $ EG=1076.03 5, IG=0.091 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1190.28 7 0.009 2 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0023 5$
149PM L 1234.099 9 (7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1234.242 6 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.94 4 6.29 2
149PMS B EAV=136.16 86
149PM cB IB$0.87 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 1.58 (2003Me01)
149PM G 483.59 5 0.26 1 dC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0675 33$
149PM CG $ EG=483.713 18, IG=0.219 18 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=483.69
149PM G 512.7 0.05 2 &C
149PM2 G %IG=0.013 5$
149PMF G FLAG=EX
149PM G 579.28 3 0.29 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.075 6$
149PM CG $ EG=579.17 5, IG=0.12 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 583.03 3 0.19 5 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 13$
149PM CG $ EG=583.055 13, IG=1.33 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 675.79 4 0.098 7 dC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0255 20$
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=675.94
149PM CG $ EG=676.17 9, IG=0.060 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 686.943 21 0.34 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.088 6$
149PM CG $ EG=686.905 16, IG=0.340 21 (2003Me01)
149PM G 696.264 21 0.66 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.171 12$
149PM CG $ EG=696.191 9, IG=0.560 11 (2003Me01)
149PM G 718.43 4 0.19 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 5$
149PM CG $ EG=718.44 4, IG=0.120 6 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$0.11 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 771.91 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 5$
149PM cG $E|g=771.91 {I4}, I|g=0.10 {I5} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a
149PM2cG line in 1979ScZL and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than
149PM3cG 0.10 if this line is from {+149}Nd decay
149PM G 808.843 20 0.73 5 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.190 14$
149PM CG $ EG=808.892 12, IG=0.545 20 (2003Me01)
149PM G 837.40 3 0.12 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0312 28$
149PM cG $E|g=835.18 {I6}, I|g=0.124 {I8} in 2003Me01 is probably the same |g,
149PM2cG although 2003Me01 place it from 1391 level
149PM G 874.00 8 0.018 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0047 10$
149PM CG $ EG=875.46 14, IG=0.025 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 945.80 3 0.083 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0216 19$
149PM CG $ EG=945.83 14, IG=0.038 15 (2003Me01)
149PM G 963.95 3 0.097 10 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0252 27$
149PM CG $ EG=964.048 19, IG=0.232 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1022.78 3 0.40 3 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.104 8$
149PM CG $ EG=1022.93 4, IG=0.266 18 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1119.79 Y ?
149PM cG RI$0.31 {I18} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a line in 1979ScZL
149PM2cG and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than 0.31 if this
149PM3cG line is from {+149}Nd decay
149PM G 1234.12 4 0.100 13
149PM2 G %IG=0.0260 35$
149PM CG $ EG=1234.31 5, IG=0.083 8 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1239.616 21 (5/2+,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1239.75 3 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.10 1 7.25 5
149PMS B EAV=134.28 86
149PM cB IB$0.092 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.16 (2003Me01)
149PM G 588.5 3 0.022 8 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0057 21$
149PM G 681.34 8 0.031 6
149PM2 G %IG=0.0081 16$
149PM CG $ EG=681.47 15, IG=0.023 4 (2003Me01)
149PM cG E$from 1979Sc12. Others: 681.92 {I9} (1968He19), 681.47 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 842.847 23 0.20 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.052 5$
149PM CG $ EG=842.97 4, IG=0.143 6 (2003Me01)
149PM G 951.3 0.010 4 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0026 10$
149PM cG E$see comment on 952.1|g
149PM CG $ EG=951.06 18, IG=0.013 7 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1125.32 5 0.114 14 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.030 4$
149PM CG $ EG=1125.40 4, IG=0.26 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1239.5 3 0.007 2 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0018 5$
149PM cG E$1238.56 (1986Ii01)
149PM L 1264.01 6 (5/2,7/2)
149PM CL E$1264.28 5 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.035 4 7.62 5
149PMS B EAV=126.00 85
149PM cB IB$0.032 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.058 (2003Me01)
149PM G 993.05 0.015 7 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 18$
149PMF G FLAG=EJ$
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=993.84
149PMF G FL=270.170
149PM CG $ EG=993.56 21, IG=0.015 9 (2003Me01)
149PM cG RI$0.05 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 1150.08 8 0.089 9 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0231 24$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG RI$0.01 (1986Ii01)
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=1149.70
149PMF G FL=114.313
149PM G 1264.02 6 0.029 5
149PM2 G %IG=0.0075 13$
149PM CG $ EG=1263.8 5, IG=0.0102 23 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1290.078 25 (3/2+,5/2,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1290.85 22 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.090 8 7.12 4
149PMS B EAV=117.27 84
149PM cB IB$0.083 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.107 (2003Me01)
149PM G 864.9 0.013 5 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0034 13$
149PM CG $ EG=864.85 11, IG=0.068 26 (2003Me01)
149PM G 893.3 0.017 4 EC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0044 10$
149PM CG $ EG=892.94 9, IG=0.028 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 929.8 3 0.042 5 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0109 13$
149PM cG E$from 1979Sc12. Others: 929.43 {I5} (1968He19), 929.9 (1986Ii01)
149PM G 1078.76 3 0.244 27 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.063 7$
149PM CG $ EG=1078.68 23, IG=0.199 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1175.75 6 0.013 3 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0034 8$
149PM G 1290.11 6 0.016 3 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0042 8$
149PM L 1293.4 4 A ?
149PM cL J$(3/2+,5/2,7/2)
149PM B 0.018 8 7.8 2 ?
149PMS B EAV=116.16 85
149PM cB IB$ 0.0025 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1293.4 4 0.07 3 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.018 8$
149PM L 1312.106 15 (5/2)
149PM CL E$ 1312.506 20 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.183 13 6.73 4
149PMS B EAV=109.96 83
149PM cB IB$0.17 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.273 (2003Me01)
149PM G 567.56 0.064 13 JC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0166 34$
149PM CG $ EG=567.32 14, IG=0.06 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 590.74 17 0.016 4 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0042 10$
149PM G 657.2 0.07 3 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.018 8$
149PMF G FLAG=EH$
149PM G 849.926 25 0.084 7 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0218 19$
149PM G 886.59 8 0.021 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0055 11$
149PM CG $ EG=886.54 16, IG=0.021 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 896.65 14 0.015 5 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 13$
149PM CG $ EG=897.09 22, IG=0.011 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 915.35 9 0.008 4 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0021 10$
149PM G 952.0 0.029 10 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0075 26$
149PMF G FLAG=DJ$
149PM cG E$other: 951.95 {I5} for doublet (1968He19)
149PM CG $ EG=952.61 4, IG=0.039 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1041.95 3 0.11 1 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0286 27$
149PM CG $ EG=1042.36 17, IG=0.043 15 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1100.77 3 0.19 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.049 5$
149PM CG $ EG=1100.68 3, IG=0.126 26 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1123.47 8 0.058 9 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0151 24$
149PM CG $ EG=1124.62 4, IG=0.42 6 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1197.84 6 0.026 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0068 11$
149PM CG $ EG=1197.47 19, IG=0.021 4 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1312.13 6 0.028 4 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0073 11$
149PM L 1328.81 7 A ?
149PM cL J$ 3/2+ (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.034 4 7.40 6 ?
149PMS B EAV=104.48 82
149PM cB IB$0.039 (2003Me01)
149PM G 371.92 6 0.086 10 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0223 27$
149PM G 813.19 8 0.044 7 ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0114 19$
149PM cG $Placement from 2003Me01
149PM CG $ EG=813.09 23, IG=0.028 9 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1363.85 4 A ?
149PM cL J$ 5/2+ (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.024 3 7.40 6 ?
149PMS B EAV=93.15 81
149PM cB IB$0.068 (2003Me01)
149PM G 332.167 18 0.068 4 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0177 12$
149PM G 976.2 3 0.025 10 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0065 26$
149PM L 1367.9713 A ?
149PM CL J$ (5/2+,7/2,9/2)
149PM B 0.016 13 7.6 4 ?
149PMS B EAV=91.83 80
149PM cB IB$0.022 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1367.96 13 0.06 5 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.016 13$
149PM L 1394.25 20 3/2+ B
149PM cL E$1391.691 {I6}; (5/2+,7/2+) (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.016 6 7.4 2
149PMS B EAV=83.49 79
149PM cB IB$0.023 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.101 (2003Me01)
149PM G 978.8 0.06 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.016 5$
149PMF G FLAG=DH$
149PM CG $ EG=978.43 21, IG=0.15 4 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1406.84 8 A ?
149PM cL J$ 9/2- (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.035 3 7.04 4 ?
149PMS B EAV=79.55 80
149PM cB IB$0.049 (2003Me01)
149PM G 859.42 5 0.076 7 G ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0197 19$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG $I|g and placement from 2003Me01
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=859.72
149PMF G FL=547.126
149PM CG $ EG=858.74 11 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1407.26 6 0.058 5 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0151 14$
149PMF G FLAG=d
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=1406.84
149PM L 1412.10 4 (5/2,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1411.89 3; 7/2- (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.032 8 7.1 1
149PMS B EAV=77.91 78
149PM cB IB$0.046 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.110 (2003Me01)
149PM G 661.90 11 0.020 8 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0052 21$
149PM CG $ EG=660.97 3, IG=0.122 5 (2003Me01)
149PMF G FLAG=BH$
149PM G 775.97 15 0.013 3 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0034 8$
149PMF G FL=637.43
149PM cG E$774.6|g placed from 1190 level in 1979Sc12 and 1986Ii01
149PM G 854.74 0.017 4 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0044 10$
149PM cG E$poor fit; level-energy difference=854.06
149PMF G FL=558.15
149PMF G FLAG=EJ$
149PM G 865.00 5 0.051 25 DC
149PM2 G %IG=0.013 7$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 986.68 10 0.009 2 X
149PM2 G %IG=0.0023 5$
149PM G 1016.1 3 0.014 5 YC ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0036 13$
149PM G 1051.90 11 0.017 5 B
149PM2 G %IG=0.0044 13$
149PM CG $ EG=1051.34 20, IG=0.015 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1141.77 8 0.010 4 &C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0026 10$
149PMF G FLAG=BX
149PM L 1448.24 7 (3/2+,5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 1449.250 23 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.0047 9 7.7 1
149PMS B EAV=66.79 77
149PM cB IB$0.020 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.067 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1237.61 Y ?
149PM cG RI$0.149 {I9} (2003Me01), but no evidence of such a line in 1979ScZL
149PM2cG and 1968He19. Intensity must be much weaker than 0.149 if this
149PM3cG line is from {+149}Nd decay
149PMF G FL=211.308
149PM G 1259.62 7 0.016 3 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0042 8$
149PM CG $ EG=1259.22 5, IG=0.0048 22 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1448.07 19 0.002 1
149PM2 G %IG=0.00052 26$
149PM CG $ EG=1449.56 3, IG=0.032 6 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1495.86 5 (5/2,7/2+)
149PM CL E$ 1495.19 11 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.010 2 7.1 1
149PMS B EAV=52.54 74
149PM cB IB$0.059 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.014 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1135.94 9 0.008 3 B
149PM2 G %IG=0.0021 8$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM G 1206.7 3 0.015 6 Y ?
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 16$
149PM G 1225.67 11 0.006 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0016 5$
149PM G 1284.49 13 0.006 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0016 5$
149PM G 1307.6 0.004 2 E
149PM2 G %IG=0.0010 5$
149PMF G FLAG=X
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=1307.2
149PM G 1381.42 8 0.008 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0021 5$
149PM G 1495.80 14 0.006 2
149PM2 G %IG=0.0016 5$
149PM CG $ EG=1495.36 11, IG=0.027 3 (2003Me01)
149PM L 1568.60 5 (5/2+,7/2)
149PM CL E$ 1568.63 6 (2003Me01)
149PM B 0.018 3 6.2 1
149PMS B EAV=31.73 70
149PM cB IB$0.045 (TAGS,1997Gr09), 0.063 (2003Me01)
149PM G 818.18 0.022 6 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0057 16$
149PME G FLAG=EJ$
149PM G 1021.8 0.010 4 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0026 10$
149PMF G FLAG=DH$
149PM cG E$level-energy difference=1021.5
149PM CG $ EG=1020.99 20, IG=0.063 8 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1171.97 10 0.015 3 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0039 8$
149PM CG $ EG=1170.88 19, IG=0.068 9 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1280.28 12 0.004 2 C
149PM2 G %IG=0.0010 5$
149PM CG $ EG=1280.57 6, IG=0.043 3 (2003Me01)
149PM G 1298.32 10 0.003 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0008 5$
149PM G 1357.26 11 0.008 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0021 5$
149PM G 1454.29 12 0.005 2 XC
149PM2 G %IG=0.0013 5$
149PM G 1568.43 18 0.002 1
149PM2 G %IG=0.00052 26$