149EU 149GD EC DECAY (9.28 D) 2006RI11,1987AD02,1990ME1522NDS 202210
149EU H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 185, 2 (2022)$
149EU2 H CUT=23-Aug-2022$
149EU c 2006Ri11: {+149}Gd obtained from neutron irradiation of {+148}Gd using
149EU2c Triga reactor. Measured E|g, I|g, neutron capture |s
149EU3c using a high-efficiency Ge detector
149EU c 1987Ad02: measured E|g, I|g, integral |g|g
149EU c 1990Me15: measured E|g, I|g, K| x ray
149EU c 1992Ca11: measured E|g, I|g, ce. E|g values are given without
149EU2c uncertainties.
149EU c Other main references for E|g, I|g, ce, |g|g-coin, (ce)|g-coin
149EU2c and ce data:
149EU c 1996Vy02: Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, ce. (ce)|g coin, I(x rays), |a
149EU2c decay. Analysis of data reported earlier (1978-1980) in secondary
149EU3c references. Several new |g rays are listed in this paper; energies
149EU4c and |e feedings for 16 excited states are also listed. Full details
149EU5c of this work are not available
149EU c 1975Al14: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, ce, (ce)|g coin, I(x rays)
149EU c 1975Se18: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g|g(|q)
149EU c 1974Ga13: measured ce and E|g
149EU c 1970Ep01 (also 1970EpZZ): measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, I(x rays), |g|g(t)
149EU c 1966Ha23: measured ce data
149EU c 1966Av05: measured ce data
149EU c Other measurements:
149EU c No |b{++} radiation reported by 1953Ra02, and I(|b{++})/|e{-K}<0.001
149EU2c (1970Ep01)
149EU c E|g, I|g data using Ge(Li) detectors: 1973Ag08, 1969Gr32,
149EU2c 1968Wi21, 1968Ad01, 1967Cl05, 1966Wi12, 1966Ja11. Others using
149EU3c NaI(Tl) detectors: 1962Pr06, 1961So04, 1957Sh46.
149EU c ce: 1974Ga13, 1968Wi21, 1958An35, 1958Ad38
149EU c |g|g-, |g(ce)-, (ce)(ce)-coin: 1968Wi21, 1966Ja11, 1962Pr06, 1961So04,
149EU2c 1961Be36, 1961Be33, 1959Dz05, 1956St23
149EU c K| x-ray intensity: 1975Al14, 1970Ep01, 1968Ad01, 1962Pr06
149EU c |g|g(t): 1970Kl07, 1969Iv02, 1962Pr06, 1962Be25, 1962Be20, 1961Be08,
149EU2c 1961So04, 1956St23
149EU c |g|g(|q): 1985Be64, 1962Pr06
149EU c |g|g(|q,H,t): 1970Kl07 (also 1969Kl12)
149EU c |g(|q,T): 1987Kr11 (also 1985Fi06), 1987Be33, 1986Va16
149EU2c (also 1985Va08). |m({+149}Gd g.s.) determined from these data
149EU3c together with |d for some of the transitions in {+149}Eu
149EU c T{-1/2}({+149}Gd g.s.): 1970Ep01, 1962Pr06, 1958Pa16,
149EU2c 1958An35, 1957Sh46, 1951Ho30
149EU c Assignment for {+149}Gd isotope: 1966Mc11, 1958Ad38, 1958Go72,
149EU2c 1957Sh46, 1957Go40, 1958Go72, 1953Ra02, 1951Ho30
149EU c {+149}Gd |a decay: 1967Go32, 1966Wi12, 1965Si06, 1965Ma48, 1953Ra02,
149EUXc 1951Ho30
149EU c Total decay energy deposit of 1294 keV {I71} calculated by RADLIST
149EU2c code is in agreement with expected value of 1314 keV {I4}, indicating
149EU3c the completeness of the decay scheme.
149EU cG E$Weighted average of values from the most precise and consistent
149EU2cG data from 2006Ri11, 1990Me15 and 1987Ad02, with uncertainty increased
149EU3cG to 0.010 keV, when a lower uncertainty is reported in 1990Me15 and/or
149EU4cG 1987Ad02. As indicated, unweighted averages are taken in a few cases
149EU5cG where there is lack of consistent data. Exceptions are noted. Other
149EU6cG (less precise) measurements using Ge(Li) detector:
149EU5cG 1975Se18, 1975Al14.
149EU cG E(X)$Transition reported by 1996Vy02 not confirmed
149EU2cG by 2006Ri11, upper limit of intensity is given
149EU cG E(N),RI(N)$Reported only by 2006Ri11. Authors suggest a tentative
149EU2cG placement as no |g|g-coin evidence is available yet for this |g ray.
149EU cG RI$Weighted average of values from the most precise and consistent
149EU2cG data from 2006Ri11, 1990Me15 and 1987Ad02, with uncertainty increased
149EU3cG to 0.5%, when a lower uncertainty is reported in 1990Me15 and/or
149EU4cG 1987Ad02. As indicated, unweighted averages are taken in a few cases
149EU5cG where there is lack of consistent data. Exceptions are noted. Other
149EU6cG (less precise) measurements using Ge(Li) detector: 1992Ca11, 1975Se18,
149EU7cG 1975Al14, 1970Ep01
149EU cG M,MR$From ce data given under comments, unless otherwise noted. In
149EU2cG cases where ce data give M1+E2 or E1+M2 with a significant admixture,
149EU3cG the former assignment is preferred, as there is no evidence of long
149EU4cG half-lives, as would be expected when there is substantial M2
149EU5cG admixture. Where only ce data are available, the quoted mixing ratio is
149EU6cG deduced from those data by the evaluators using the BrIccMixing program
149EU cG $Conversion coefficients under comments are deduced by evaluators from
149EU2cG I|g and I(ce) values as given under comments, with the latter being the
149EU3cG weighted average of values from 1966Av05, 1966Ha23, 1974Ga13, 1975Al14,
149EU4cG 1992Ca11, unless otherwise noted. The I|g and Ice(K) values were
149EU5cG normalized together to give |a(K)exp=0.503 for the 149.7-keV
149EU6cG transition, which is the theoretical value for an M1+E2 (|d=0.14 {I3})
149EU7cG transition.
149EU cG $Following weak lines reported by different authors have
149EU2cG been omitted for lack of confirmation in more recent work:
149EU cG $1966Av05 (from ce data): 58.68, 64.25, 72.9, 80.2, 86.9,
149EU2cG 97.66, 102.6, 106.3, 112.8, 119.5, 119.8, 130.8, 143.0, 178.5, 296.6
149EU cG $1966Ha23 (from ce data): 76.0, 76.6, 230.4, 235.1, 268.6,
149EU2cG 316.9, 325.6, 401.8, 593.5, 613.8, 718.2, 1029.3
149EU cG $1968Ad01 (from |g-ray data): 230.4, 235.1
149EU cG $1975Se18 (from |g-ray data): 229.0, 238.5, 610.0
149EU cG $K-x ray energies (intensities) (relative to I|g=100 for 149.7|g)
149EU2cG (1990Me15) are: 40.877 (60 {I1}), 41.529 (107 {I2}), 47.027 (34 {I2}),
149EU3cG 48.241 (9.2 {I14}). Other measurements: 1996Vy02, 1975Al14, 1970Ep01,
149EU4cG 1968Ad01, 1962Pr06
149EU cL $A tentative 956-keV level proposed by 1975Se18; and 869- and 1051-keV
149EU2cL levels proposed by 1996Vy02 are not confirmed by 2006Ri11.
149EU cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels
149EU cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data.
149GD P 0 7/2- 9.28 D 10 1314 4
149GD cP J,T$From {+149}Gd Adopted Levels
149GD cP QP$From 2021Wa16
149EU N 0.484 26 0.999995 1 1.0
149EU cN NR$|S(I(|g+ce) to g.s.)=95 {I5}, assuming I|e(g.s.)=5 {I5}. See also
149EU2cN comment on g.s. feeding.
149EU cN BR$%|a=0.00050 {I12} from weighted average of %|a=0.00063 {I12}
149EU2cN (1996Vy02) (from I|a(3019|a in {+149}Gd |a
149EU3cN decay)/I|g(149.8)=0.0000118 {I23}), 0.00046 {I15}
149EU4cN (1965Si06) (from I|a/I(|eK)=4.61|*10{+-6}), and 0.00040 {I12}
149EU5cN (1966Wi12) (from I|a/I(|eK)=4.01|*10{+-6}). Others:
149EU6cN I|a/I(|eK)=3|*10{+-6} (1967Go32), 0.0007% (1953Ra02)
149EU PN 3
149EU G 37.80 15
149EU cG E$the details of the observation of this transition in ce data
149EU2cG (1975Al14 and 1966Ha23) are not available
149EU cG $Suggested placement (534 (J|p=7/2+) to 496 (J|p=11/2-))
149EU2cG seems suspect since with the required mult=M2, the
149EU3cG deduced T{-1/2}(534 level)>1.7 |ms
149EU4cG (assuming RUL(M2)<1) is inconsistent with observed |g|g coin
149EU5cG involving 534|g where the resolving time may be typically 50 ns
149EU cG $I(|g+ce)=0.24 {I4} (1975Al14)
149EU G 196.93 0.01 LT X
149EU G 203.14 0.003 LT X
149EU G 238.25 0.003 LT X
149EU cG $Earlier placement from a 1050.8 level not supported by 2006Ri11
149EU G 239.87 0.003 LT X
149EU G 248.64 0.01 LT X
149EU G 270.79 0.01 LT X
149EU G 292.86 0.01 LT X
149EU G 346.30 0.15 5
149EU2 G %IG=0.073 25$
149EU cG $|g from 1990Me15 only. Note that this |g is just to left of the
149EU2cG third most intense 346.65-keV |g in this decay. No such |g is
149EU3cG confirmed by 2006Ri11
149EU G 372.62 0.003 LT X
149EU cG $Earlier placement from a 869 level not supported by 2006Ri11
149EU G 394.59 0.002 LT X
149EU G 400.20 0.002 LT X
149EU G 419.47 15 0.006 2
149EU2 G %IG=0.0029 10$
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11 only, possible assignment to the decay of {+149}Gd
149EU G 429.73 0.002 LT X
149EU G 447.42 0.01 LT X
149EU G 456.77 3 0.0495 21
149EU2 G %IG=0.0240 16$
149EU cG $E|g=456.74 {I4} (2006Ri11), 456.75 {I4} (1990Me15), 456.80 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.048 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.044 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0506 {I21}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 502.12 0.002 LT X
149EU G 522.12 0.002 LT X
149EU G 527.92 0.003 LT X
149EU G 574.88 0.002 LT X
149EU G 577.96 0.002 LT X
149EU G 581.79 0.002 LT X
149EU G 590.96 0.002 LT X
149EU cG $Earlier placement from a 1050.8 level not supported by 2006Ri11
149EU G 593.16 0.002 LT X
149EU G 629.01 0.001 LT X
149EU G 672.37 0.001 LT X
149EU G 688.27 0.003 LT X
149EU G 711.72 0.001 LT X
149EU G 715.21 0.001 LT X
149EU G 719.19 0.002 LT X
149EU cG $Earlier placement from a 869 level not supported by 2006Ri11
149EU G 738.66 0.002 LT X
149EU G 756.42 0.003 LT X
149EU G 872.62 0.005 LT X
149EU G 880.04 0.002 LT X
149EU G 898.99 0.001 LT X
149EU G 956.4 0.001 LT X
149EU cG $Presence of this |g ray in 1992Ca11 (I|g=0.03 {I3} and 1975Se18
149EU2cG (E|g=956.4 {I5}, I|g=0.55 {I30}, and tentative placement from a
149EU3cG 956.4 level by 1975Se18 are not supported by 1996Vy02 and 2006Ri11.
149EU L 0.0 5/2+ 93.1 D 4
149EU E 0.0033 LT 10.0 LT 8.0 GT 10 LT
149EUS E EAV=144.8 19$CK=0.8364$CL=0.12645 3$CM+=0.036793 8
149EU cE IE$limit for g.s. feeding was obtained from |g-ray intensity balance
149EU2cE and K| x ray intensity (I|g(K| x ray)=211|+16, relative to
149EU3cE I|g(149.9)=100, weighted average of
149EU4cE 1975Al14,1970Ep01,1968Ad01,1962Pr06), with |w(K)=0.932 (1979Kr13) and
149EU5cE |eK/(|e+|b{++})=0.82. I(|b{++})/I(|eK)<0.001 (1970Ep01). Other: 4
149EU6CE (1996Vy02)
149EU L 149.732 57/2+ 0.32 NS 2
149EU dL E$149.734 {I7} (1996Vy02)
149EU cL T$|g|g(t) (1962Be25). Others: 1962Pr06, 1956St23
149EU E 34.2 19 7.39 3 34.2 19
149EUS E CK=0.8355$CL=0.12736 3$CM+=0.03711 1
149EU cE TI$other: 36 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 149.730 10 100.0 6 M1+E2 0.14 3 0.587 8 C
149EU2 G %IG=48.4 26$
149EU cG $E|g=149.72 {I1} (2006Ri11), 149.736 {I3} (1990Me15), 149.740 {I14}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=100.0 {I6} (2006Ri11), 100.0 {I7} (1990Me15), 100.0 {I19}
149EU2CG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.48 2 (1975Al14)$ EL1C=0.062 3$ EL2C=0.0062 7$ EL3C=0.0016 6
149EU2 G EMC=0.023 5 $EM1C=0.017 3 $ ENC=0.0046 15$ EKC=0.459 15 (1996Vy02)
149EUS G KC=0.495 7$LC=0.0725 13$MC=0.01571 30
149EUS G NC=0.00359 7$OC=0.000567 10$PC=5.44E-5 8
149EU CG $ICE(K)=100 3, ICE(L1)=12.3 6, ICE(L2)=1.24 13, ICE(L3)=0.32 13,
149EU2CG ICE(M1)=3.5 5, ICE(M)=4.7 10, ICE(N)=0.91 30
149EU cG MR$from L1:L2:L3=12.2 {I6}:1.24 {I13}:0.32 {I12} (1966Av05,1966Ha23)
149EU L 459.826 8(3/2,5/2)+
149EU cL E$459.853 {I23} (J|p=5/2+,7/2+) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.220 14 9.30 3
149EUS E CK=0.8317$CL=0.13022 6$CM+=0.03809 2
149EU cE TI$other: 0.24 {I5} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 459.819 10 1.208 10M1(+E2) 0.4 LT 0.0281 9 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.585 31$
149EU cG $E|g=459.84 {I2} (2006Ri11), 459.812 {I4} (1990Me15), 459.821 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=1.224 {I22} (2006Ri11), 1.199 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.222 {I17}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.025 2
149EUS G KC=0.0238 8$LC=0.00333 8$MC=0.000717 16
149EUS G NC=0.000164 4$OC=2.60E-5 7$PC=2.58E-6 10
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.060 4
149EU L 496.389 611/2- 2.45 US 5
149EU cL E$496.398 {I12} (1996Vy02)
149EU cL T$|g|g(t). Weighted average of 2.48 |ms {I5} (1961Be08),
149EU2cL 2.43 |ms {I3} (1970Kl07), 2.42 |ms {I21} (1962Pr06). Others: 2.6 |ms
149EU3cL (1969Iv02), 3.3 |ms {I4} (1961So04)
149EU2 L G=+1.103 (1970Kl07)
149EU cL $g factor from (299|g)(347|g)(|q,H,t) (1970Kl07)
149EU E 0.3 LT 9.1 GT ?
149EUS E CK=0.8310$CL=0.13071 6$CM+=0.03826 2
149EU cE TI$other: 1.7 (1996Vy02)
149EU G 346.650 10 49.0 3 M2+E3 -0.075 25 0.2326 33 C
149EU2 G %IG=23.7 13$
149EU cG $E|g=346.66 {I3} (2006Ri11), 346.651 {I3} (1990Me15), 346.648 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=49.8 {I5} (2006Ri11), 48.80 {I15} (1990Me15), 49.1 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.202 8$ EL1C=0.031 3$ EL2C=0.0022 4$ EL3C=0.00016 7 $
149EU2 G EM1C=0.007 2$ EKC=0.187 6 (1996Vy02)
149EUS G KC=0.1910 27$LC=0.0325 5$MC=0.00718 10
149EUS G NC=0.001648 23$OC=0.000259 4$PC=2.429E-5 35
149EU cG M$from L1:L2:L3=3.2 {I3}:0.21 {I4}:0.016 {I7} (1966Av05)
149EU CG $ICE(K)=19.9 6, ICE(L1)=3.0 3, ICE(L2)=0.21 4, ICE(L3)=0.016 7,
149EU2CG ICE(M1)=0.7 2
149EU cG MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Be33). Other: -0.08 {I+11-5} (1986Va16). ce
149EU2cG data consistent with pure M2
149EU cG $(347|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.009 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.011 {I23} (1962Pr06)
149EU G 496.385 10 3.424 17E3 0.0392 5
149EU2 G %IG=1.66 9$
149EU cG $E|g=496.41 {I2} (2006Ri11), 496.383 {I2} (1990Me15), 496.380 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=3.35 {I6} (2006Ri11), 3.431 {I15} (1990Me15), 3.41 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG M$from L1:L2:L3=0.024 {I4}:0.024 {I6}:0.0051 {I25} (1966Av05)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0274 18$ EL1C=0.0035 6$ EL2C=0.0035 6$ EL3C=0.00075 37$
149EU2 G EM1C=0.0018 6
149EUS G KC=0.0289 4$LC=0.00797 11$MC=0.001818 25
149EUS G NC=0.000410 6$OC=6.02E-5 8$PC=3.08E-6 4
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.188 10, ICE(L1)=0.024 4, ICE(L2)=0.024 6, ICE(L3)=0.0051 25,
149EU2CG ICE(M1)=0.012 4
149EU L 534.295 57/2+
149EU cL E$534.296 {I22} (1996Vy02)
149EU E 1.05 7 8.54 3
149EUS E CK=0.83028 9$CL=0.13127 7$CM+=0.03845 3
149EU cE TI$other: 0.75 {I24} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 384.539 10 0.157 4 [M1,E2] 0.037 9 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.076 4$
149EUS G KC=0.031 8$LC=0.0049 5$MC=0.00107 10
149EUS G NC=0.000243 23$OC=3.8E-5 5$PC=3.2E-6 11
149EU cG $E|g=384.54 {I2} (2006Ri11), 384.52 {I2} (1990Me15), 384.545 {I12}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.154 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.160 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 534.294 10 6.44 5 M1(+E2) 0.4 LT 0.0192 6 C
149EU2 G %IG=3.12 17$
149EU cG $E|g=534.31 {I2} (2006Ri11), 534.296 {I4} (1990Me15), 534.288 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=6.49 {I12} (2006Ri11), 6.41 {I5} (1990Me15), 6.5 {I1}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0176 12$ EL1C=0.0021 6$ EM1C=0.00047 15
149EUS G KC=0.0163 6$LC=0.00225 6$MC=0.000486 12
149EUS G NC=0.0001112 29$OC=1.77E-5 5$PC=1.76E-6 7
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.224 12, ICE(L1)=0.027 7, ICE(M1)=0.006 2, ICE(L)=0.020 4
149EU L 666.291 6 9/2+
149EU cL E$666.290 {I24} (J|p=7/2+,9/2+) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.1 LT 9.4 GT ?
149EUS E CK=0.8269 2$CL=0.1338 1$CM+=0.03931 4
149EU cE TI$other: 0.17 (1996Vy02)
149EU G 132.004 10 0.187 10M1 0.837 12 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.091 7$
149EU cG $E|g=132.00 {I1} (2006Ri11), 132.001 {I9} (1990Me15), 132.06 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.187 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.186 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.147 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02, seems discrepant, not used in averaging)
149EU2 G EKC=0.88 8$ EL1C=0.16 7$ ELC=0.36 12
149EUS G KC=0.709 10$LC=0.1010 14$MC=0.02182 31
149EUS G NC=0.00500 7$OC=0.000793 11$PC=7.83E-5 11
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.27 2, ICE(L1)=0.05 2, ICE(L)=0.11 3
149EU cG $(132|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.15 {I12} (1975Se18)
149EU G 516.550 10 5.58 8 M1+E2 0.75 +27-240.0182 14 C
149EU2 G %IG=2.70 15$
149EU cG $E|g=516.57 {I2} (2006Ri11), 516.545 {I2} (1990Me15), 516.549 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=5.58 {I10} (2006Ri11), 5.53 {I10} (1990Me15), 5.60 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG RI$6.28 {I6} (1975Al14) is not used in averaging
149EU2 G EKC=0.0153 7 $ EL1C=0.0025 7$EM1C=0.0006 2$ ELC=0.0018 4
149EUS G KC=0.0153 13$LC=0.00223 12$MC=0.000484 25
149EUS G NC=0.000110 6$OC=1.74E-5 10$PC=1.63E-6 15
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.170 5, ICE(L1)=0.028 7, ICE(M1)=0.007 2, ICE(L)=0.020 4
149EU cG $(516|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.120 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I25} (1975Se18)
149EU G 666.289 10 1.811 13E2 0.00649 9
149EU2 G %IG=0.88 5$
149EU cG $E|g=666.29 {I1} (2006Ri11), 666.290 {I4} (1990Me15), 666.286 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=1.853 {I22} (2006Ri11), 1.801 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.822 {I28}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG M,MR$from ce data |d(E2/M1)>1.3; from |g(|q) in (p,4n|g)
149EU2cG mult=Q
149EU2 G EKC=0.0062 9$ EL1C=0.0084 28
149EUS G KC=0.00540 8$LC=0.000853 12$MC=0.0001861 26
149EUS G NC=4.23E-5 6$OC=6.54E-6 9$PC=5.49E-7 8
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.022 3, ICE(L1)=0.003 1
149EU L 748.601 67/2-
149EU cL E$748.610 {I25} (1996Vy02)
149EU E 8.6 5 7.32 3
149EUS E CK=0.8239 2$CL=0.1360 2$CM+=0.04008 5
149EU cE TI$other: 8.5 {I4} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 82.33 8 0.011 2 [E1] 0.479 7
149EU2 G %IG=0.0053 10$
149EUS G NC=0.00297 4$OC=0.000442 6$PC=3.26E-5 5
149EUS G KC=0.401 6$LC=0.0614 9$MC=0.01324 19
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11
149EU cG E$others: 82.50 {I15} (1975Al14), 83.01 (1996Vy02)
149EU cG RI$others: 0.065 {I15} (1975Al14), 0.06 {I2} (1992Ca11),
149EU2cG 0.11 {I1} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 214.275 13 0.403 8 (E1) 0.0365 5 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.195 11$
149EU cG $E|g=214.28 {I2} (2006Ri11), 214.28 (1990Me15), 214.268 {I13}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Uncertainty of 0.015 keV assumed in 1990Me15
149EU cG $I|g=0.409 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.387 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.409 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.09 4
149EUS G KC=0.0310 4$LC=0.00433 6$MC=0.000930 13
149EUS G NC=0.0002109 30$OC=3.26E-5 5$PC=2.85E-6 4
149EU cG $E1 or E2 from |a(K)exp
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.074 38
149EU cG $(214|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I10} (1975Se18)
149EU G 252.210 10 0.560 12E2 0.1006 14
149EU2 G %IG=0.271 16$
149EU cG $E|g=252.19 {I2} (2006Ri11), 252.222 {I4} (1990Me15), 252.203 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.563 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.538 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.580 {I11}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU2 G EKC=0.085 5
149EUS G KC=0.0753 11$LC=0.01969 28$MC=0.00446 6
149EUS G NC=0.001000 14$OC=0.0001448 20$PC=6.77E-6 9
149EU cG M$|d(E2/M1)=2.5 {I+33-8} from |a(K)exp, but |DJ|p requires E2
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.095 5
149EU G 598.89 5 0.0415 29 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.0201 18$
149EU cG $E|g=598.84 {I4} (2006Ri11), 598.94 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.047 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.0400 {I21}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 748.604 10 17.09 20E1+M2 +0.041 13 0.00194 4 C
149EU2 G %IG=8.3 4$
149EU cG $E|g=748.62 {I2} (2006Ri11), 748.601 {I2} (1990Me15), 748.603 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=17.19 {I20} (2006Ri11), 16.94 {I26} (1990Me15), 17.08 {I27}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0015 2
149EUS G KC=0.001661 32$LC=0.000218 5$MC=4.67E-5 10
149EUS G NC=1.067E-5 22$OC=1.685E-6 35$PC=1.657E-7 35
149EU cG $|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.1
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.051 7
149EU cG MR$from |g(|q,T) (1986Va16). Others: +0.034 {I21}
149EU2cG (quoted by 1986Va16 from another work), 1987Kr11
149EU L 776.69 10 (3/2 TO 9/2)
149EU E 0.0147 11 10.04 4
149EUS E CK=0.8227 2$CL=0.13692 15$CM+=0.04040 5
149EU G 776.69 10 0.0304 14
149EU2 G %IG=0.0147 10$
149EU cG $E|g=776.59 {I5} (2006Ri11), 776.78 {I4} (1987Ad02): unweighted
149EU2cG average
149EU cG $I|g=0.033 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0298 {I14} (1987Ad02). Other:
149EU2cG 0.035 {I7} (1996Vy02)
149EU L 795.030 79/2-
149EU cL E$794.98 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU E 33.0 18 6.66 3
149EUS E CK=0.8218 2$CL=0.13759 16$CM+=0.04063 6
149EU cE TI$other: 36.4 {I15} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 128.74 2 0.077 5 E1+M2 0.18 6 0.36 16
149EU2 G %IG=0.0373 31$
149EU cG $E|g=128.74 {I2} (2006Ri11), 128.75 {I3} (1990Me15), 128.77 {I11}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.081 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.078 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.069 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.26 11
149EUS G KC=0.29 12$LC=0.056 28$MC=0.012 6
149EUS G NC=0.0029 15$OC=4.4E-4 23$PC=3.7E-5 20
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.039 15
149EU G 260.736 10 2.688 29 E1 0.0218931 C
149EU2 G %IG=1.30 7$
149EU cG $E|g=260.73 {I3} (2006Ri11), 260.737 {I6} (1990Me15), 260.735 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=2.69 {I5} (2006Ri11), 2.687 {I29} (1990Me15), 2.69 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0182 14
149EUS G KC=0.01862 26$LC=0.00257 4$MC=0.000552 8
149EUS G NC=0.0001254 18$OC=1.946E-5 27$PC=1.746E-6 24
149EU cG $|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.05
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.099 6
149EU cG $(261|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.110 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I5} (1975Se18)
149EU cG $|g(|q,T): 1987Kr11
149EU G 298.633 10 57.72 29M1+E2 +0.15 2 0.0884 13 C
149EU2 G %IG=27.9 15$
149EU cG $E|g=298.63 {I1} (2006Ri11), 298.634 {I5} (1990Me15), 298.634 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=57.9 {I6} (2006Ri11), 57.66 {I24} (1990Me15), 57.9 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.073 4$ EL1C=0.0095 12$ EL2C=0.00061 16$ EL3C LE 0.00013$
149EU2 G EKC=0.0723 20 (1996Vy02)
149EUS G KC=0.0749 11$LC=0.01057 15$MC=0.002281 32
149EUS G NC=0.000522 7$OC=8.28E-5 12$PC=8.19E-6 12
149EU CG $ICE(K)=8.6 3, ICE(L1)=1.13 11, ICE(L2)=0.073 18, ICE(L3) LE 0.015
149EU cG MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Be33). Others: +0.15 {I3} (1986Va16), +0.11 {I3}
149EU2cG (quoted by 1986Va16 from another work). Combining experimental |a
149EU3cG values above and L1:L2:L3=1.13 {I11}:0.073 {I18}:0.015 gives |d<0.35
149EU G 645.315 10 3.043 19E1 0.00259 4 C
149EU2 G %IG=1.47 8$
149EU cG $E|g=645.31 {I1} (2006Ri11), 645.315 {I2} (1990Me15), 645.309 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=3.12 {I4} (2006Ri11), 3.035 {I15} (1990Me15), 3.02 {I4} (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0023 3
149EUS G KC=0.002214 31$LC=0.000292 4$MC=6.26E-5 9
149EUS G NC=1.427E-5 20$OC=2.251E-6 32$PC=2.192E-7 31
149EU cG $|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.12
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.014 2
149EU cG $(645|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.13 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I6} (1975Se18)
149EU cG $|g(|q,T) data: 1987Kr11
149EU G 794.7 0.002 LT ?
149EU2 G %IG LT 0.000968$
149EU cG $|g reported only by 1975Al14 and 1996Vy02. Interpreted by 2006Ri11
149EU2cG as a sum line, an upper limit set
149EU cG $I|g=0.028 {I12} (1996Vy02), 0.056 {I19} (1975Al14)
149EU cG E$794.7 {I3} in 1975Al14
149EU L 798.937 15 (9/2+)
149EU E 0.098 9 9.18 4
149EUS E CK=0.8216 2$CL=0.13774 16$CM+=0.04068 6
149EU G 264.66 4 0.080 9 (M1) 0.1229 17
149EU2 G %IG=0.039 5$
149EU cG $E|g=264.60 {I4} (2006Ri11), 264.63 {I3} (1990Me15), 264.72 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.081 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.064 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.095 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU2 G EKC=0.20 5
149EUS G KC=0.1043 15$LC=0.01464 20$MC=0.00316 4
149EUS G NC=0.000723 10$OC=0.0001149 16$PC=1.145E-5 16
149EU cG $|a(K)exp marginally agrees with M1
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.035 10
149EU cG $Placement from 1013 level in 1975Al14 is not supported by
149EU2cG 1987Ad02 and 2006Ri11, and from level energy difference
149EU G 302.58 3 0.026 4 N ?
149EU2 G %IG=0.0126 20$
149EU G 649.11 7 0.028 5 [M1,E2] 0.0095 26
149EU2 G %IG=0.0136 25$
149EUS G KC=0.0080 23$LC=0.00116 25$MC=0.00025 5
149EUS G NC=5.7E-5 12$OC=9.0E-6 20$PC=8.5E-7 27
149EU cG $E|g=649.15 {I7} (2006Ri11), 649.06 {I8} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.033 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0223 {I16} (1987Ad02); unweighted
149EU2cG average
149EU G 798.91 2 0.104 4
149EU2 G %IG=0.0503 33$
149EU cG $E|g=798.90 {I2} (2006Ri11), 798.94 {I2} (1990Me15), 798.90 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02).
149EU cG $I|g=0.108 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.093 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.104 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Other: 0.090 {I5} (1996Vy02)
149EU cG M$(M2) from 1996Vy02 proposed by 1996Vy02 for 798.9|g is inconsistent
149EU2cG with positive parity for the 798 level
149EU L 812.631 75/2+
149EU cL E$812.63 {I5} (J|p=5/2+,7/2+) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.264 22 8.72 4
149EUS E CK=0.8208 3$CL=0.13828 17$CM+=0.04087 6
149EU cE TI$other: 0.75 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 278.31 3 0.164 21[M1,E2] 0.090 17 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.079 11$
149EUS G KC=0.074 18$LC=0.0132 5$MC=0.00291 16
149EUS G NC=0.000661 31$OC=0.0001004 14$PC=7.6E-6 24
149EU cG $E|g=278.34 {I2} (2006Ri11), 278.28 {I2} (1990Me15)
149EU cG $I|g=0.185 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.143 {I3} (1990Me15): unweighted average
149EU cG $(278|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.160 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.035 {I30} (1975Se18)
149EU G 352.80 2 0.084 6 [M1,E2] 0.046 11
149EU2 G %IG=0.041 4$
149EUS G KC=0.038 10$LC=0.0063 5$MC=0.00138 8
149EUS G NC=0.000315 20$OC=4.8E-5 5$PC=4.0E-6 13
149EU cG $E|g=352.79 {I5} (2006Ri11), 352.81 {I2} (1990Me15), 352.72 {I9}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.074 {I9} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.088 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 662.902 10 0.579 10M1(+E2) 0.85 LT 0.0105 10 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.280 16$
149EU cG $E|g=662.91 {I1} (2006Ri11), 662.89 {I1} (1990Me15), 662.905 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.568 {I10} (2006Ri11), 0.578 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.594 {I11}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.011 3
149EUS G KC=0.0089 9$LC=0.00124 10$MC=0.000267 21
149EUS G NC=6.1E-5 5$OC=9.7E-6 8$PC=9.5E-7 11
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.013 3
149EU G 812.630 10 0.304 5 M1,E2 0.0055 14
149EU2 G %IG=0.147 8$
149EU cG $E|g=812.62 {I2} (2006Ri11), 812.64 {I3} (1990Me15), 812.632 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.305 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.303 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.305 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0064 22
149EUS G KC=0.0047 13$LC=0.00066 15$MC=0.000142 31
149EUS G NC=3.3E-5 7$OC=5.1E-6 12$PC=5.0E-7 14
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0039 13
149EU L 875.939 10 5/2+
149EU cL E$875.01 {I5} (J|p=5/2+,7/2+) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.337 19 8.49 3
149EUS E CK=0.8168 3$CL=0.14129 23$CM+=0.04191 8
149EU cE TI$other: 0.58 {I12} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 127.1 0.003 LT[E1] 0.1483 21 ?
149EU2 G %IG LT 0.00145$
149EUS G KC=0.1252 18$LC=0.01816 25$MC=0.00391 5
149EUS G NC=0.000882 12$OC=0.0001338 19$PC=1.080E-5 15
149EU cG $E|g=127.1 {I3}, I|g=0.02 {I1}, |g reported by 1975Al14 only.
149EU2cG 2006Ri11 set an upper limit of 0.003
149EU G 341.65 5 0.158 11 [M1,E2] 0.051 12
149EU2 G %IG=0.076 7$
149EUS G KC=0.042 11$LC=0.0070 4$MC=0.00153 7
149EUS G NC=0.000347 18$OC=5.3E-5 5$PC=4.4E-6 14
149EU cG $E|g=341.66 {I5} (2006Ri11), 341.65 {I6} (1990Me15), 341.65 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.136 {I17} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.167 {I11}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 416.08 3 0.0486 15[M1,E2] 0.030 8
149EU2 G %IG=0.0235 14$
149EUS G KC=0.025 7$LC=0.0039 5$MC=0.00085 10
149EUS G NC=0.000193 24$OC=3.0E-5 5$PC=2.6E-6 9
149EU cG $E|g=416.09 {I4} (2006Ri11), 416.04 {I3} (1990Me15), 416.11 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.048 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.045 {I4} (1990Me15), 0.0493 {I15}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 726.21 1 0.165 5 M1(+E2) 0.65 LT 0.0086 6 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.080 5$
149EU cG $E|g=726.23 {I2} (2006Ri11), 726.16 {I4} (1990Me15), 726.21 {I1}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.168 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.166 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.162 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.010 3
149EUS G KC=0.0073 5$LC=0.00101 6$MC=0.000217 12
149EUS G NC=4.97E-5 29$OC=7.9E-6 5$PC=7.9E-7 6
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0033 8
149EU G 875.91 4 0.315 5 M1(+E2) 0.3 LT 0.0057313
149EU2 G %IG=0.152 8$
149EU cG $E|g=875.95 {I2} (2006Ri11), 875.83 {I1} (1990Me15), 875.943 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU cG $I|g=0.320 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.313 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.312 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0058 9
149EUS G KC=0.00489 11$LC=0.000661 14$MC=0.0001421 29
149EUS G NC=3.25E-5 7$OC=5.18E-6 11$PC=5.25E-7 12
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0036 8
149EU L 910.89 4 11/2+
149EU G 761.12 5 0.0167 10
149EU2 G %IG=0.0081 6$
149EU cG $E|g=761.10 {I3} (2006Ri11), 761.22 {I6} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.017 {I1} (2006Ri11), 0.0156 {I19} (1987Ad02)
149EU L 933.119 8 (9/2)+
149EU cL E$933.13 {I3} (J|p=7/2+) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.88 5 7.94 3
149EUS E CK=0.8118 5$CL=0.1450 3$CM+=0.04321 11
149EU cE TI$other: 0.83 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 138.10 1 0.164 12(E1+M2) 0.18 4 0.29 8
149EU2 G %IG=0.079 7$
149EU cG $E|g=138.10 {I1} (2006Ri11), 138.09 {I2} (1990Me15), 138.28 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Value from 1987Ad02 not used in averaging
149EU cG $I|g=0.141 {I8} (2006Ri11), 0.171 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.181 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU2 G EKC=0.24 6 (1975Al14)$ EKC=0.42 6$ EL1C=0.11 5
149EUS G KC=0.23 6$LC=0.043 14$MC=0.0097 31
149EUS G NC=0.0022 7$OC=3.4E-4 11$PC=2.9E-5 10
149EU cG $|a(K)exp=0.42 {I6} (using weighted average of Ice(K) values).
149EU2cG |a(K)exp=0.24 {I6} gives E1+M2 while 0.42 {I6} is consistent with E2.
149EU3cG |a(L1)exp gives E2 or E1+M2
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.086 27 (1975Al14), 0.17 2 (1992Ca11), 0.20 3 (1966Ha23)
149EU2CG 0.15 4 (1966Av05), ICE(L1)=0.04 2 (1966Ha23)
149EU G 184.51 1 0.100 4 (E1+M2) 0.25 5 0.17 4 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.0484 32$
149EU cG $E|g=184.50 {I2} (2006Ri11), 184.51 {I1} (1990Me15), 184.52 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.108 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0930 {I34} (1990Me15), 0.099 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU2 G EKC=0.14 4 $ EKC=0.046 5
149EUS G KC=0.13 4$LC=0.024 7$MC=0.0054 16
149EUS G NC=0.0012 4$OC=1.9E-4 6$PC=1.7E-5 5
149EU cG $|a(K)exp=0.14 {I4} from ce(K) in 1975Al14), 0.46 {I5} (from weighted
149EU2cG averaged ce(K)). The former value gives E2 or E1+M2, while
149EU4cG the latter (>than that for M1) is inconsistent with either mult
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.027 8 (1975Al14), 0.092 9 (1992Ca11), 0.08 2 (1966Ha23)
149EU G 266.91 7 0.050 14(M1,E2) 0.102 18
149EU2 G %IG=0.024 7$
149EU cG $E|g=266.82 {I6} (2006Ri11), 266.97 {I5} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.036 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.063 {I3} (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU2 G EKC AP 0.16
149EUS G KC=0.083 19$LC=0.0151 8$MC=0.00334 26
149EUS G NC=0.00076 5$OC=0.0001148 30$PC=8.5E-6 27
149EU CG $ICE(K) AP 0.02
149EU G 398.82 1 0.0925 23[M1,E2] 0.033 8 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.0448 26$
149EUS G KC=0.028 8$LC=0.0044 5$MC=0.00096 10
149EUS G NC=0.000219 24$OC=3.4E-5 5$PC=2.9E-6 10
149EU cG $E|g=398.82 {I3} (2006Ri11), 398.77 {I3} (1990Me15), 398.82 {I1}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.092 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0937 {I23}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 436.62 17 0.043 6
149EU2 G %IG=0.0208 31$
149EUF G FL=496.389
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this
149EU2cG energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved
149EU3cG doublet.
149EU cG $E|g=436.62 {I17} (2006Ri11). Others: 436.36 {I2} (1990Me15),
149EU2cG 436.37 {I1} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet
149EU cG $I|g=0.043 {I6} (2006Ri11). Others: 0.132 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.132 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet
149EU G 783.45 10 0.016 2 N ?
149EU2 G %IG=0.0077 11$
149EU G 933.06 7 1.288 10 E2 0.00303 4
149EU2 G %IG=0.624 33$
149EU cG $E|g=933.13 {I2} (2006Ri11), 932.925 {I6} (1990Me15), 933.134 {I14}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU cG $I|g=1.288 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1.287 {I10} (1990Me15), 1.31 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $|d(E2/M1)>1.4 from |a(K)exp, but |DJ|p requires E2
149EU2 G EKC=0.0024 8
149EUS G KC=0.00256 4$LC=0.000371 5$MC=8.02E-5 11
149EUS G NC=1.828E-5 26$OC=2.86E-6 4$PC=2.63E-7 4
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0062 20
149EU L 938.609 6 7/2+
149EU cL E$938.61 {I4} (1996Vy02)
149EU cL J$7/2+ consistent with |d(789|g) from ce and |g(|q,T)
149EU E 14.0 8 6.72 3
149EUS E CK=0.8112 5$CL=0.1454 4$CM+=0.04335 12
149EU cE TI$other: 14.3 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 125.98 1 0.303 6 E2,M1 1.01 5
149EU2 G %IG=0.147 8$
149EU cG $E|g=125.99 {I2} (2006Ri11), 125.98 {I1} (1990Me15), 125.98 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.300 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.313 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.250 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Value from 1987Ad02 not used in averaging
149EU2 G EKC=0.46 8 $ EKC=0.97 6 $ EL1C=0.14 4
149EUS G KC=0.71 10$LC=0.23 11$MC=0.052 27
149EUS G NC=0.012 6$OC=0.0017 8$PC=6.8E-5 21
149EU cG $|a(K)exp=0.46 {I8} (ce(K) from 1975Al14,1966Av05), 0.97 {I6}
149EU2cG (ce(K) from 1992Ca11,1966Ha23). Mult=E2 from former and M1 from
149EU3cG latter.
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.21 4 (1966Av05), 0.26 6 (1975Al14), 0.59 9 (1966Ha23),
149EU2CG 0.48 2 (1992Ca11), ICE(L1)=0.07 (1966Ha23)
149EU G 139.74 8 0.029 3 N ?
149EU2 G %IG=0.0140 16$
149EU G 189.7 0.005 LT[E1] 0.0504 7 ?
149EU2 G %IG LT 0.00242$
149EUS G KC=0.0428 6$LC=0.00602 8$MC=0.001293 18
149EUS G NC=0.000293 4$OC=4.51E-5 6$PC=3.88E-6 5
149EU cG $E|g=189.70 {I20}, I|g=0.02 {I1}, |g reported by 1975Al14 only; not
149EU2cG confirmed by 2006Ri11
149EU G 272.320 10 6.66 10M1+E2 0.33 +12-8 0.1104 29 C
149EU2 G %IG=3.22 18$
149EU cG $E|g=272.32 {I3} (2006Ri11), 272.317 {I5} (1990Me15), 272.322 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=6.61 {I13} (2006Ri11), 6.66 {I10} (1990Me15), 6.69 {I13}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.098 8$ EL1C=0.0135 14$ EL2C=0.0012 3$ EL3C LE 0.00055$
149EU2 G EM1C=0.0030 15
149EUS G KC=0.0930 29$LC=0.01367 21$MC=0.00296 5
149EUS G NC=0.000677 11$OC=0.0001066 15$PC=1.01E-5 4
149EU cG MR$from experimental |a values above, and L1:L2:L3=0.18 {I2}:0.016
149EU2cG {I4}:0.0073 (1966Av05), using the BrIccMixing program.
149EU CG $ICE(K)=1.30 4, ICE(L1)=0.18 2, ICE(L2)=0.016 4, ICE(L3) LE 0.0073,
149EU2CG ICE(M1)=0.04 2
149EU cG $(272|g)(666|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.143 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.013 {I20} (1985Be64)
149EU G 404.299 10 0.408 5 M1,E2 0.032 8 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.198 11$
149EUS G KC=0.027 7$LC=0.0042 5$MC=0.00092 10
149EUS G NC=0.000210 24$OC=3.3E-5 5$PC=2.8E-6 9
149EU cG $E|g=404.32 {I3} (2006Ri11), 404.294 {I5} (1990Me15), 404.302 {I9}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.402 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.416 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.413 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $|a(K)exp=0.011 {I4} (ce(K) from 1975Al14), 0.032 {I12}
149EU2cG (ce(K) from 1966Ha23)
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0086 26 (1975Al14), 0.026 10 (1966Ha23)
149EU cG $(404|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.11 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.11 {I10} (1975Se18)
149EU cG $(404|g)(534|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.025 {I18} (1985Be64)
149EU G 478.78 2 0.424 6 E2(+M1) 4 GT 0.0153 4 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.205 11$
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this
149EU2cG energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved
149EU3cG doublet.
149EU cG $E|g=478.78 {I2} (2006Ri11), 478.71 {I1} (1990Me15), 478.710 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02).
149EU cG $I|g=0.424 {I6} (2006Ri11), 0.475 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.473 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.011 2
149EUS G KC=0.01253 34$LC=0.00221 4$MC=0.000487 9
149EUS G NC=0.0001103 20$OC=1.675E-5 32$PC=1.25E-6 4
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.010 2
149EU G 788.875 10 15.15 15E2+M1 -5 2 0.0045120 C
149EU2 G %IG=7.3 4$
149EU cG $E|g=788.87 {I2} (2006Ri11), 788.878 (1990Me15), 788.873 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Uncertainty assumed as 0.010 keV in 1990Me15
149EU cG $I|g=15.11 {I22} (2006Ri11), 15.12 {I15} (1990Me15), 15.32 {I26}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG MR$from |g(|q,T) (1987Be33). Others: +0.43 {I6} (1987Be33 for 5/2
149EU2cG to 7/2 transition), >5 (from ce data). |d from |g|g(|q) data
149EU3cG is not deduced due to large discrepancy in A{-2} values from 1985Be64
149EU4cG and 1975Se18
149EU2 G EKC=0.0035 3$ EL1C=0.0006 2$ ELC=0.0012 6$ EM1C=0.00015 5
149EUS G KC=0.00378 18$LC=0.000566 21$MC=0.000123 4
149EUS G NC=2.80E-5 10$OC=4.36E-6 17$PC=3.89E-7 20
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.106 7, ICE(L1)=0.018 6, ICE(L)=0.035 16, ICE(M1)=0.0045 15
149EU cG $(789|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.100 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I3} (1975Se18)
149EU cG $(789|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.233 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.023 {I30} (1985Be64)
149EU G 938.616 10 5.01 4 M1+E2 1.0 +10-5 0.0040 6
149EU2 G %IG=2.43 13$
149EU cG $E|g=938.63 {I3} (2006Ri11), 938.605 {I5} (1990Me15), 938.626 {I11}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=5.03 {I4} (2006Ri11), 4.97 {I6} (1990Me15), 4.95 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0034 5$ EL1C=0.0005 2$ ELC=0.00046 6$ EM1C=0.00016 3$
149EU2 G EMC=0.00018 9
149EUS G NC=2.30E-5 30$OC=3.6E-6 5$PC=3.6E-7 6
149EUS G KC=0.0034 5$LC=0.00047 6$MC=0.000100 13
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.034 4, ICE(L1)=0.005 2, ICE(L)=0.0046 6, ICE(M1)=0.0016 3,
149EU2CG ICE(M)=0.0018 9
149EU L 952.667 18 (3/2+:9/2+)
149EU E 0.079 5 8.93 3
149EUS E CK=0.8096 5$CL=0.1466 4$CM+=0.04376 13
149EU G 418.56 21 0.0106 13
149EU2 G %IG=0.0051 7$
149EU cG $E|g=418.35 {I4} (2006Ri11), 418.77 {I13} (1987Ad02): unweighted
149EU2cG average
149EU cG $I|g=0.010 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.0108 {I13} (1987Ad02)
149EU G 492.88 6 0.0367 25
149EU2 G %IG=0.0178 15$
149EU cG $E|g=492.93 {I6} (2006Ri11), 492.81 {I7} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.034 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0385 {I25} (1987Ad02)
149EU G 802.93 2 0.0924 34
149EU2 G %IG=0.0447 29$
149EU cG $E|g=802.91 {I2} (2006Ri11), 802.93 {I2} (1990Me15), 802.95 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.098 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.088 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0891 {I27}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 952.65 4 0.0243 23
149EU2 G %IG=0.0118 13$
149EU cG $E|g=952.61 {I3} (2006Ri11), 952.68 {I3} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0266 {I15} (2006Ri11), 0.0220 {I9} (1987Ad02): unweighted
149EU2cG average
149EU L 992.203 10 (3/2+:9/2+)
149EU E 0.0374 22 9.14 3
149EUS E CK=0.8044 7$CL=0.1505 5$CM+=0.04512 16
149EU G 842.29 10 0.011 1 N ?
149EU2 G %IG=0.0053 6$
149EU G 992.201 10 0.0666 18
149EU2 G %IG=0.0322 19$
149EU cG $E|g=992.21 {I4} (2006Ri11), 992.205 {I4} (1990Me15), 992.192 {I15}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.066 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.0661 {I20} (1990Me15), 0.0675 {I18}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Other: 0.064 {I4} (1996Vy02)
149EU L 1012.594 10(5/2,7/2,9/2)
149EU cL E$1012.67 {I7} (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.202 12 8.35 3
149EUS E CK=0.8010 8$CL=0.1530 6$CM+=0.04600 19
149EU cE TI$other: 0.24 {I4} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 213.39 8 0.009 2 N ?
149EU2 G %IG=0.0044 10$
149EUF G FL=798.937
149EU cG E$poor fit in the level scheme, fitted value is 213.66 {I2}
149EU G 478.27 10 0.047 8
149EU2 G %IG=0.023 4$
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this
149EU2cG energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved
149EU3cG doublet. See comments for 478.78|g for data from 1990Me15 and 1987Ad02.
149EU4cG E|g=478.29 {I6} in ce spectrum (1975Al14), but it is not clear how
149EU5cG the authors resolved the two components of a doublet at this energy
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0047 25
149EU G 552.761 16 0.177 5 (E2(+M1)) 0.4 GT 0.0137 34
149EU2 G %IG=0.086 5$
149EU cG $E|g=552.76 {I2} (2006Ri11), 552.75 {I2} (1990Me15), 552.768 {I16}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.156 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.171 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.181 {I5}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.011 4
149EUS G KC=0.0115 30$LC=0.00172 30$MC=0.00037 6
149EUS G NC=8.5E-5 14$OC=1.33E-5 25$PC=1.21E-6 35
149EU cG $|a(K)exp gives E2(+M1) with |d>0.4 or E1+M2 with |d=0.47 {I15};
149EU2cG the latter value seems less probable due to significant M2 mixture
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0039 16
149EU G 862.862 12 0.136 2 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.066 4$
149EU cG $E|g=862.87 {I3} (2006Ri11), 862.86 {I3} (1990Me15), 862.861 {I12}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.135 {I2} (2006Ri11), 0.140 {I4} (1990Me15), 0.1360 {I28}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG M$|a(K)exp gives M2. But it is inconsistent with |DJ=0,1 which would
149EU2cG favor E1 component over M2
149EU2 G EKC=0.018 5
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0051 13
149EU G 1012.61 2 0.0482 16
149EU2 G %IG=0.0233 15$
149EU cG $E|g=1012.61 {I4} (2006Ri11), 1012.59 {I5} (1990Me15), 1012.61 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0514 {I11} (2006Ri11), 0.0465 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.0466 {I14}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU L 1097.591 10(9/2)-
149EU CL E$1097.59 {I4} (J|p=7/2-,9/2-) (1996Vy02)
149EU E 1.18 7 7.24 4
149EUS E CK=0.7779 17$CL=0.1701 13$CM+=0.0520 5
149EU cE TI$other: 1.04 {I6} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 186.67 4 0.0201 16[E1] 0.0526 7
149EU2 G %IG=0.0097 9$
149EUS G KC=0.0447 6$LC=0.00629 9$MC=0.001351 19
149EUS G NC=0.000306 4$OC=4.71E-5 7$PC=4.04E-6 6
149EU cG $E|g=186.63 {I3} (2006Ri11), 186.729 {I53} (1990Me15), 186.75 {I7}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.024 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0206 {I25} (1990Me15), 0.0192 {I16}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 349.04 10 0.136 13[M1,E2] 0.048 12
149EU2 G %IG=0.066 7$
149EUS G KC=0.040 11$LC=0.0065 5$MC=0.00143 8
149EUS G NC=0.000325 20$OC=5.0E-5 5$PC=4.1E-6 14
149EU cG $E|g=349.12 {I10} (2006Ri11), 348.96 {I10} (1990Me15)
149EU cG $I|g=0.133 {I10} (2006Ri11), 0.20 {I5} (1990Me15)
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.012 4
149EU G 431.297 12 0.146 3 E1 0.00633 9 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.071 4$
149EU cG $E|g=431.30 {I2} (2006Ri11), 431.294 {I12} (1990Me15), 431.298 {I12}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.145 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.142 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.147 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.010 5
149EUS G KC=0.00541 8$LC=0.000728 10$MC=0.0001561 22
149EUS G NC=3.56E-5 5$OC=5.57E-6 8$PC=5.26E-7 7
149EU CG $|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.3
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0031 16
149EU G 563.49 10 0.0219 22[E1] 0.00346 5
149EU2 G %IG=0.0106 12$
149EUS G KC=0.00296 4$LC=0.000393 6$MC=8.42E-5 12
149EUS G NC=1.920E-5 27$OC=3.02E-6 4$PC=2.91E-7 4
149EU cG $E|g=563.58 {I25} (2006Ri11), 563.48 {I10} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.024 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.0212 {I22} (1987Ad02)
149EU G 601.201 15 0.1221 26(M1) 0.0146821 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.0591 34$
149EU cG $E|g=601.21 {I3} (2006Ri11), 601.206 (1990Me15), 601.196 {I15}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02). Uncertainty of 0.020 keV assumed in 1990Me15
149EU cG $I|g=0.126 {I7} (2006Ri11), 0.122 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.1216 {I26}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.016 3
149EUS G KC=0.01251 18$LC=0.001708 24$MC=0.000367 5
149EUS G NC=8.42E-5 12$OC=1.340E-5 19$PC=1.353E-6 19
149EU cG $|a(K)exp: ce(K) may be composite of 599|g and 601|g
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0039 8 (probably for both 599G and 601G)
149EU G 947.858 19 1.98 3 E1 1.20E-3 2 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.96 5$
149EU cG $E|g=947.88 {I3} (2006Ri11), 947.820 {I6} (1990Me15), 947.873 {I10}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02): unweighted average
149EU cG $I|g=1.99 {I3} (2006Ri11), 1.973 {I34} (1990Me15), 1.99 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.00099 20
149EUS G KC=0.001028 14$LC=0.0001335 19$MC=2.85E-5 4
149EUS G NC=6.51E-6 9$OC=1.032E-6 14$PC=1.028E-7 14
149EU cG $|a(K)exp gives |d(M2/E1)<0.15
149EU cG $(948|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I7} (1975Se18)
149EU cG $(948|g)(150|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.063 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.005 {I9} (1985Be64)
149EU G 1097.54 0.004 LT ?
149EU2 G %IG LT 0.00194$
149EU cG $E|g=1097.54, I|g=0.018 {I7} in 1996Vy02. 2006Ri11 interpreted this
149EU2cG |g ray as a sum line, and set an upper limit of 0.004
149EU L 1165.04 3 (5/2,7/2,9/2)
149EU E 0.0122 8 8.80 5
149EUS E CK=0.731 5$CL=0.204 4$CM+=0.0642 13
149EU G 1015.30 3 0.0253 10
149EU2 G %IG=0.0122 8$
149EU cG $E|g=1015.25 {I9} (2006Ri11), 1015.31 {I3} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0260 {I24} (2006Ri11), 0.0252 {I10} (1987Ad02). Other:
149EU2cG 0.027 {I2} (1996Vy02)
149EU L 1207.72 3 (5/2,7/2,9/2)
149EU E 0.0045 5 8.8 1
149EUS E CK=0.647 15$CL=0.266 11$CM+=0.087 4
149EU G 673.43 3 0.0070 9
149EU2 G %IG=0.0034 5$
149EU cG $E|g=673.43 {I2} (2006Ri11), 673.65 {I15} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0076 {I12} (2006Ri11), 0.0067 {I9} (1987Ad02)
149EU G 1207.70 7 0.0024 2
149EU2 G %IG=0.00116 11$
149EU cG $E|g=1207.58 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1207.71 {I7} (1990Me15), 1207.81 {I12}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0030 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.00220 {I20} (1990Me15), 0.0024 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU L 1220.56 10 5/2+
149EU E 0.0043 6 8.7 1
149EUS E CK=0.594 23$CL=0.305 17$CM+=0.101 7
149EU G 421.59 18 0.0072 11[E2] 0.0213130
149EU2 G %IG=0.0035 6$
149EUS G KC=0.01716 24$LC=0.00325 5$MC=0.000720 10
149EUS G NC=0.0001627 23$OC=2.447E-5 34$PC=1.678E-6 24
149EU cG $E|g=421.55 {I20} (2006Ri11), 421.63 {I18} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.010 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.0071 {I11} (1987Ad02)
149EU G 1220.57 12 0.0016 1
149EU2 G %IG=0.00077 6$
149EU cG $E|g=1220.49 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1220.64 {I12} (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0020 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0016 {I1} (1987Ad02)
149EU L 1231.253 99/2-
149EU cL E$1231.27 {I4} (1996Vy02)
149EU E 0.268 15 6.7 1
149EUS E CK=0.52 4$CL=0.36 3$CM+=0.120 10
149EU cE TI$other: 0.20 {I2} (1996Vy02)
149EU G 436.24 3 0.091 4 (M1) 0.0331 5
149EU2 G %IG=0.0441 30$
149EUF G FL=795.030
149EUS G KC=0.0281 4$LC=0.00388 5$MC=0.000837 12
149EUS G NC=0.0001917 27$OC=3.05E-5 4$PC=3.06E-6 4
149EU cG E,RI$from 2006Ri11, as individual values for the doublet at this
149EU2cG energy are given. In other references, values are for an unresolved
149EU3cG doublet.
149EU cG $E|g=436.24 {I3} (2006Ri11). Others: 436.36 {I2} (1990Me15),
149EU2cG 436.37 {I1} (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet
149EU cG $I|g=0.091 {I4} (2006Ri11). Others: 0.132 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.132 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02) for unresolved doublet
149EU cG M$|a(K)exp=0.046 {I16} for the doublet is consistent with M1 for the
149EU2cG main placement with 1231 level
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.012 4
149EU G 482.640 12 0.155 3 M1(+E2) 2 LT 0.021 4 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.075 4$
149EU cG $E|g=482.66 {I2} (2006Ri11), 482.63 {I2} (1990Me15), 482.636 {I12}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.155 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.157 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.155 {I4}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.021 7
149EUS G KC=0.018 4$LC=0.00265 35$MC=0.00057 7
149EUS G NC=0.000131 17$OC=2.05E-5 29$PC=1.9E-6 5
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0066 20
149EU G 734.86 1 0.264 6 M1(+E2) 2 LT 0.0074 15 C
149EU2 G %IG=0.128 7$
149EU cG $E|g=734.85 {I3} (2006Ri11), 734.84 {I2} (1990Me15), 734.87 {I1}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.262 {I8} (2006Ri11), 0.274 {I10} (1990Me15), 0.261 {I6}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.0071 22
149EUS G KC=0.0063 13$LC=0.00088 15$MC=0.000191 31
149EUS G NC=4.4E-5 7$OC=6.9E-6 12$PC=6.7E-7 15
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0037 11
149EU G 1081.58 3 0.0371 14
149EU2 G %IG=0.0180 12$
149EU cG $E|g=1081.57 {I3} (2006Ri11), 1081.58 {I6} (1990Me15), 1081.58 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0356 {I27} (2006Ri11), 0.0362 {I15} (1990Me15), 0.0382 {I14}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU2 G EKC=0.021 14
149EU cG $|a(K)exp marginally agrees with M2
149EU CG $ICE(K)=0.0016 11
149EU G 1231.2 2 0.00070 20[M2] 0.00617 9
149EU2 G %IG=0.00034 10$
149EUS G KC=0.00523 7$LC=0.000736 10$MC=0.0001590 22
149EUS G NC=3.65E-5 5$OC=5.80E-6 8$PC=5.82E-7 8$IPC=2.431E-6 35
149EU cG $E|g=1231.4 {I2} (2006Ri11), 1231.0{I2} (1990Me15)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0005 {I5} (2006Ri11), 0.00073 {I20} (1990Me15)
149EU L 1246.41 5 (5/2,7/2,9/2)
149EU E 0.0037 3 8.2 1
149EUS E CK=0.35 8$CL=0.48 6$CM+=0.170 21
149EU G 1096.68 5 0.0034 3
149EU2 G %IG=0.00165 17$
149EU cG $E|g=1096.79 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1096.70 {I5} (1990Me15), 1096.59 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.005 {I3} (2006Ri11), 0.0029 {I5} (1990Me15), 0.0035 {I3}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU G 1246.38 8 0.0043 2
149EU2 G %IG=0.00208 15$
149EU cG $E|g=1246.27 {I12} (2006Ri11), 1246.4 {I1} (1990Me15), 1246.41 {I8}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)
149EU cG $I|g=0.0046 {I4} (2006Ri11), 0.00445 {I34} (1990Me15), 0.0041 {I2}
149EU2cG (1987Ad02)