147GD 147GD IT DECAY (516 NS) 2020BR06,1982BA46,1982BR1322NDS 202203
147GD H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. Nica and B. Singh$CIT=NDS 181, 1 (2022)$CUT=9-Mar-2022$
147GD c 2020Br06 compiled for xundl database by J. Chen (NSCL, MSU) and B.
147GD2c Singh (McMaster)
147GD c 2020Br06: {+147}Gd produced via {+76}Ge({+76}Ge,5n) reaction with
147GD2c E=290 MeV {+76}Ge beam at the Tandem-ALPI accelerators on
147GD3c self-supporting 0.8 mg/cm{+2}, 99% enriched {+76}Ge target, with
147GD5c prompt |g rays emitted directly from the target shielded from the GASP
147GD4c array by Pb cylinder. Recoiling reaction products were collected in
147GD6c 99.9% enriched {+208}Pb catcher surrounded by
147GD7c GASP array of 40 Compton suppressed HPGe detectors.
147GD8c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g|g-coin. Deduced levels, J, |p,
147GD9c |g-ray conversion coefficients, multipolarities.
147GD c 1987Da27: {+124}Sn({+28}Si,5n|g), E=108 MeV. Measured |g(|q,H,t).
147GD2c Used Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors.
147GD2c Deduced g factor (time dependent perturbed angular distribution)
147GD c 1985Da20: {+124}Sn({+28}Si,5n|g), E=120, 144 MeV. Measured |g(|q,H,t).
147GD2c Used multifoil arrays, pulsed beam, Ge(Li) detectors.
147GD2c Deduced nuclear polarization, average atomic spin, polarization,
147GD2c sign of Q
147GD c 1982Ba46: ({+16}O,4n|g) and ({+28}Si,5n|g) reactions.
147GD2c Report data and decay scheme from 27-ns 3582 level up to the 510-ns
147GD2c state at 8588 keV; measured |g|g, |g(|q) and ce(K);
147GD2c pulsed beam, Ge(Li), Si(Li) detectors, NaI(Tl) array, mini-orange
147GD2c spectrometer
147GD c 1982Br13: ({+12}C,5n) and (|a,5n) reactions.
147GD2c Report data and decay scheme from the g.s. up to the 510-ns
147GD2c measured isomeric state at 8588 MeV; |g, |g|g, |g(|q)
147GD c 1982Ha22: {+124}Sn({+28}Si,5n|g), E=108-144 MeV. |g(|q,H,t) vs. T.
147GD2c Used pulsed beam, Ge(Li) detectors, recoil implantation into Gd.
147GD2c Deduced Q (time dependent perturbed angular distribution, tilted
147GD2c foil time differential perturbed |g angular correlation), deformation.
147GD c 1979Ha15: {+124}Sn({+28}Si,5n|g), E=108-144 MeV and {+144}Sm(|a,n|g),
147GD2c E=30 MeV. Used enriched targets, pulsed beam, Ge(Li) detectors,
147GD2c paramagnetic correction. Measured |g|g(|q,H,t). Deduced T{-1/2}, g
147GD2c factor (time dependent perturbed angular distribution), configuration.
147GD c 1979Fa01: {+124}Sn({+28}Si,5n|g), E=119, 132 MeV. Measured |g(|q,H,t).
147GD2c Used enriched targets, pulsed beam, Ge(Li) detectors.
147GD2c Deduced g factor (time dependent perturbed angular distribution)
147GD c Others: 2007Po13, 2005St24, 1989Ra17, 1979TaZO, 1979Kl04, 1979TaZO,
147GDxc 1981Ha17, 1982Ha22, 1983BrZV, 2007Po13.
147GD c The decay scheme is that of 2020Br06 who largely confirm that of
147GD2c 1982Ba46 and 1982Ba46
147GD cG $Mentioned in the table are five |g rays the multipolarities of
147GD3cG which were changed in an e-mail reply from R. Broda to B. Singh from
147GD3cG August 16, 2020
147GD cG E,RI$From 2020Br06 unless otherwise noted
147GD cG E$Unplaced |g's are from 1982Br13 unless noted otherwise.
147GD cG M$As given in 2020Br06, if not differently specified. Unless otherwise
147GD2cG indicated, assignments are implied from |DJ|p (which according to the
147GD2cG evalution standards are given under brackets in the table). Pure M1
147GD2cG assumed for |DJ=1 or 0, |D|p=no transitions
147GD cG E(Z)$Unplaced gamma from 1982Ba46
147GD cG M(X)$From |a(exp) in 2020Br06, deduced from intensity balance
147GD2cG observed in their |g|g-coin data
147GD cG M(Y)$From 1982Ba46 based on
147GD2cG |g(|q) and |a(K)exp measurements normalized to the 997-keV E3
147GD cG M(E)$From |g(|q) and |a(exp) deduced from intensity
147GD2cG balance considerations by 1982Br13
147GD cG M(J) Identified as stretched E1 by 1979Kl04 from |g(|q).
147GD cG M(K) From 1979Kl04.
147GD cG M(L) Assigned by 1979Kl04 from |DJ|p and T{-1/2}.
147GD cG E(B),RI(B)$Unobserved transitions, with its presence required by the
147GD2cG |g|g-coincidence analysis, except for the 71.8|g observed in
147GD3cG |g|g-coincidence. The photon intensities are from the estimated total
147GD4cG transition intensities (2020Br06)
147GD cG E(C)$Transitions used to normalize isomer decay intensity to 100
147GD cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies.
147GD2cL Reduced |h{+2}=0.77, with only one |g-ray poorly fitted.
147GD cL J$As given in 2020Br06
147GD P 8588.07 17 49/2+ 516 NS 20
147GD cP T$From Adopted Levels
147GD N 1.0 1.0 1.0
147GD cN $From 2020Br06 who list only the normalized absolute intensities per
147GD2cN 100 decays of the 8588 isomer parent (from the condition
147GD2cN |SI(|g+ce)(8588)=100). From that one gets |SI(|g+ce)(8588)=100) {I3}
147GD2cN and |SI(|g+ce)(to g.s.)=100 {I4} that indicates that there is no
147GD2cN significant intensity to decay by a different decay mode
147GD PN 3
147GD G 171.8 5 3.0
147GD G 208.3 4 2.5 AP D E ?
147GD cG E,RI$placed at 7035 level by 1982Br13 only, not confirmed by 2020Br06
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I15}, A{-4}=0.10 {I20} (1982Br13)
147GD G 316.0 4 Z
147GD G 374 1 2.0 AP
147GD cG RI from 1982Br13 (|g|g).
147GD G 463.8 3 3.6
147GD cG RI from 1982Br13
147GD G 598.3 2 3 1
147GD3 G FLAG=Z
147GD G 693.0 4
147GD G 748.0 4 Z
147GD G 781.0 4 Z
147GD G 866.0 5 2.1
147GD G 935.5 3 3.6
147GD G 967.0 4 4 1 (E1) 1.21E-3
147GD3 G FLAG=Z
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0018 (1982Ba46)
147GDS G KC=0.001037 15$LC=0.0001356 19$MC=2.91E-5 4$NC+=7.79E-6 11
147GDS G NC=6.69E-6 10$OC=1.036E-6 15$PC=6.97E-8 10
147GD G 971.4 2 4.8 E1 1.20E-3
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.29 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I20} (1982Br13)
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0010 (1982Ba46)
147GDS G KC=0.001028 15$LC=0.0001344 19$MC=2.89E-5 4$NC+=7.72E-6 11
147GDS G NC=6.63E-6 10$OC=1.027E-6 15$PC=6.91E-8 10
147GD G 984.6 E2
147GD3 G FLAG=Z
147GD cG RI$68 {I8} relative to 254|g in 1982Ba46 only
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.15 {I8} (1982Ba46)
147GD4 G EKC=0.0030 12 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 1091.0 4 Z
147GD G 1180.3 5 4.5
147GD G 1258 1 2.0
147GD G 1434.7 3 3.2
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.14 {I15}, A{-4}=0.11 {I19} (1982Br13)
147GD L 0.0 7/2-
147GD L 997.10 10 13/2+ 22.2 NS 15
147GD2 L G=+0.075 3 (1987Da27)$ MOMM1=+0.49 2 (2020StZV)$
147GD2 L MOME2=-0.70 8 (2016St14)$
147GD cL $|b{-2}=-0.05 (1982Ha22)
147GD cL T$adopted value. Measured in this dataset: 22.2 ns {I15} (1979Ha15)
147GD cL G,MOMM1$based on g factor measured by 1987Da27
147GD2cL Other: g factor=-0.037 {I11} (1979Ha15), |m=-0.24 {I7}
147GD2cL (adopted by 1987Da27 compilation based on 1987Da27).
147GD2cL 1987Da27 argue that they used improved technique compared to
147GD2cL conventional laboratory magnetic field of 1979Ha15
147GD cL MOME2$absolute value measured by 1982Ha22; sign deduced by
147GD2cL 1985Da20
147GD G 997.1 1 99.408 9 [E3] 0.00596 100.0 C
147GD cG RI$deduced by evaluator from I(|g+ce)=100.0 and |a(total)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.33 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I2} (1982Br13)
147GD L 2488.18 13 17/2+
147GD G 1491.0 1 90.5 33 E2 1.31E-3 E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1982Br13)
147GD L 2572.15 13 19/2-
147GD G 83.9 1 6.31 24[E1] 0.468
147GD G 1575.1 1 9.3 3 [E3] 0.00217
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.36 {I3}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4} (1982Br13)
147GD L 2760.27 14 21/2+ 5 NS 1
147GD cL T$from 1979Ha15
147GD2 L G=+0.72 11 (1979Ha15)$MOMM1=+7.6 12 (1987Da27)
147GD cL G,MOMM1$deduced by 1987Da27 compilation based on g factor measured by
147GD2cL 1987Da27
147GD G 188.1 1 15.5 8 D E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.14 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1982Br13)
147GD G 272.1 1 76.7 33 E2 0.0817 E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.22 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I1} (1982Br13)
147GD L 3038.01 16 23/2+
147GD G 277.8 1 79.6 33 M1+E2 0.1 0.1169 K
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.07 {I1}, A{-4}=0.01 {I1} (1982Br13)
147GD L 3186.20 16 23/2+
147GD G 425.9 1 3.31 3 M1+E2 0.030
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.07 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I18} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.23 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.028 8 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 3398.79 16 25/2+
147GD G 212.6 3 0.13 4 [M1] 0.242
147GD G 360.8 1 68.5 28 M1+E2 0.18 0.0587
147GDF G FLAG=KE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.05 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.00 {I1} (1982Br13)
147GD G 638.6 1 5.44 21 E2 0.00753 E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.24 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I8} (1982Br13)
147GD L 3509.96 16 23/2-
147GD G 323.8 1 0.14 3 [E1] 0.01317
147GD G 471.9 2 0.38 3 [E1] 0.00537
147GD G 749.7 3 0.55 8 [E1] 0.00199
147GD G 937.9 2 1.82 10[E2] 0.00315
147GD L 3581.72 15 27/2- 26.8 NS 7
147GD cL T$from 1979Ha15
147GD2 L G=0.840 17 (1979Ha15)$ MOMM1=+11.3 2 (1987Da27)
147GD2 L MOME2=-1.21 9 (2016St14)$
147GD cL $|b{-2}=-0.06 (1982Ha22)
147GD cL G,MOMM1$deduced by 1987Da27 based on g factor measured by
147GD2cL 1979Ha15
147GD cL G$other: 0.884 {I25} (1979Fa01)
147GD cL MOMM1$other: +11.9 {I3} (adopted by 2014StZZ based on 1979Fa01)
147GD cL MOME2$absolute value measured by 1982Ha22; sign deduced by
147GD2cL 1985Da20
147GD G 71.8 1 0.10 2 [E2] 8.80 B
147GD G 182.9 1 67.0 20 E1 0.0575 J
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I1}, A{-4}=0.00 {I1} (1982Br13)
147GD G 395.5 1 1.26 9 [M2] 0.1662
147GD G 543.7 1 11.8 6 M2 0.0631 L
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.19 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I8} (1979Kl04)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.24 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD G 821.3 1 4.10 2 [E3] 0.00966
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.26 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I17} (1982Br13)
147GD L 3691.74 16 25/2-
147GD G 110.0 1 2.65 17 M1 1.533 X
147GD2 G ECC=1.9 5 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I5}, A{-4}=0.00 {I6} (1982Br13)
147GD G 181.8 2 1.21 33[M1] 0.373
147GD G 293.0 2 0.50 6 [E1] 0.01690
147GD G 505.5 1 2.12 12 D E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I10}, A{-4}=0.00 {I10} (1982Br13)
147GD G 653.8 1 4.97 22 D E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1982Br13)
147GD L 4006.71 16 27/2-
147GD G 315.0 1 2.44 9 [M1] 0.0840
147GD G 424.9 1 10.4 3 (M1) 0.0384 E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.33 {I4}, A{-4}=0.01 {I4} (1982Br13)
147GD L 4070.09 16 27/2-
147GD G 378.4 1 11.5 3 M1 0.0518
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.21 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I3} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GDB G EKC=0.036 15 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 488.4 1 0.51 4 [M1] 0.0268
147GD G 671.4 1 2.44 10 D
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.26 {I19}, A{-4}=0.01 {I25} (1982Br13)
147GD L 4211.35 17 27/2-
147GD G 519.5 2 0.42 7 [M1] 0.0229
147GD G 812.6 2 1.40 8 [E1] 1.69E-3
147GD L 4229.79 16 29/2-
147GD G 159.7 1 8.04 23 M1 0.534 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.54 4 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.15 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I3} (1982Br13)
147GD G 223.0 1 2.68 8 D E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=0.05 {I8} (1982Br13)
147GD G 647.9 2 0.46 6 [M1] 0.01318
147GD L 4337.95 18 27/2-
147GD G 646.2 2 0.30 3 [M1] 0.01327
147GD G 756.2 2 0.17 3 [M1] 0.00900
147GD G 939.3 3 0.39 6 [E1] 1.28E-3
147GD L 4450.72 16 29/2-
147GD G 380.7 2 0.26 4 [M1] 0.0510
147GD G 444.0 1 5.19 17(M1+E2) 0.0343 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.11 {I8} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.017 7 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 759.1 2 0.49 4 [E2] 0.00502
147GD G 868.9 1 8.64 28 M1+E2 0.0051
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.28 {I10} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0048 9 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 4533.45 16 29/2-
147GD G 303.5 2 0.28 3 [M1] 0.0927
147GD G 322.1 1 0.50 6 [M1] 0.0792
147GD G 463.4 1 2.87 15[M1] 0.0307
147GD G 526.8 1 0.92 6 [M1] 0.0222
147GD G 951.7 1 1.12 7 [M1] 0.00515
147GD L 4617.85 16 29/2+
147GD G 279.6 3 0.06 2 [E1] 0.0190
147GD G 406.5 1 0.60 6 [E1] 0.00759
147GD G 611.2 1 1.83 8 [E1] 0.00304
147GD G 1036.1 1 24.5 7 E1 1.06E-3
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.34 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I3} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0007 3 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 1219.1 3 0.19 6 [E2] 0.00184
147GD L 4843.79 16 31/2-
147GD G 310.2 3 0.11 3 [M1] 0.0875
147GD G 393.1 1 3.06 20[M1] 0.0469
147GD G 614.0 1 4.97 20 M1+E2 0.01507
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.01 {I6}, A{-4}=0.08 {I9} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.16 {I10} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0050 15 (1982Ba46)
147GD cG EKC$deduced from intensity balance.
147GD G 836.7 3 0.56 6 [E2] 0.00404
147GD G 1261.9 1 4.21 11[E2] 1.73E-3 E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.28 {I12}, A{-4}=0.14 {I16} (1982Br13)
147GD L 4948.63 16 31/2+
147GD G 330.8 1 24.5 7 M1 0.0738
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=0.01 {I2} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.19 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.079 17 (1982Ba46)
147GD2 G ECC=0.07 2 (2020Br06)
147GD G 415.2 1 0.91 6 [E1] 0.00722
147GD G 498.0 1 2.38 17[E1] 0.00476
147GD L 4971.71 16 31/2-
147GD G 520.9 2 0.41 6 [M1] 0.0228
147GD G 742.0 2 0.65 3 [M1] 0.00943
147GD G 964.9 2 0.40 7 [E2] 0.00297
147GD G 1390.0 1 9.67 31 E2 1.46E-3
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.22 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I7} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.15 {I6} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0012 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 5029.10 16 33/2+
147GD G 57.4 3 0.15 1 [E1] 1.271 25
147GD G 80.4 1 4.33 46 M1 3.77
147GDF G FLAG=XY
147GD2 G ECC=4.1 5 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.19 {I10} (1982Ba46)
147GD G 185.2 3 0.64 9 [E1] 0.0557
147GD L 5118.09 17 29/2-
147GD G 1426.1 3 0.28 6 [E2] 1.40E-3
147GD G 1536.2 2 0.59 6 [M1] 1.77E-3
147GD L 5265.00 16 31/2-
147GD G 146.8 2 0.28 3 [M1] 0.677
147GD G 236.1 2 0.23 4 [E1] 0.0294
147GD G 293.0 3 0.10 3 [M1] 0.1018
147GD G 316.0 2 0.49 9 [E1] 0.01399
147GD G 421.2 1 7.40 22 M1(+E2) 0.031
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.10 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.15 {I7} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.039 15(1982Ba46)
147GD G 647.2 2 0.61 8 [E1] 0.00269
147GD G 814.2 1 7.90 17 M1 0.00751
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.17 {I7}, A{-4}=0.00 {I8} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.23 {I8} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0063 12 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 927.2 2 0.86 6 [E2] 0.00323
147GD G 1053.6 2 0.73 8 [E2] 0.00247
147GD G 1195.0 1 1.08 10[E2] 0.00192
147GD G 1258.2 2 0.82 7 [E2] 1.74E-3
147GD G 1683.3 1 21.8 8 E2 1.13E-3 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.29 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.20 {I10} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0011 4 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 5272.23 17 31/2-
147GD G 654.4 1 0.60 4 [E1] 0.00263
147GD G 821.4 1 0.49 9 [M1] 0.00735
147GD L 5382.13 16 33/2-
147GD G 117.2 1 17.8 7 M1 1.279
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD2 G ECC=1.20 15 (2020Br06)
147GD3 G EKC=1.3 5 (1982Ba46)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.13 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.10 {I3} (1982Ba46)
147GD G 264.0 1 0.23 3 [E2] 0.0899
147GD cG M$M1 in Table III of 2020Br06 is a misprint, as confirmed in
147GD2cG e-mail reply from R. Broda
147GD G 352.9 1 2.63 13[E1] 0.01066
147GD G 410.4 1 2.38 10[M1] 0.0420
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1982Br13), most likely Q
147GD2cG transition, which contradicts the |DJ|p assignment of 2020Br06
147GD G 433.6 1 0.83 9 [E1] 0.00653
147GD G 538.4 1 4.20 17[M1] 0.0210
147GD G 848.7 1 4.39 17 E2 0.00391 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0038 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 1152.2 1 9.85 31 E2 0.00206
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.26 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I9} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.19 {I6} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0016 6 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 5439.13 17 31/2-
147GD G 906.0 3 0.09 6 [M1] 0.00580
147GD G 1857.6 1 0.56 6 [E2] 1.04E-3
147GD L 5582.99 16 35/2-
147GD G 200.7 1 47.0 22 M1 0.284
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD2 G ECC=0.34 8 (2020Br06)
147GD3 G EKC=0.22 6 (1982Ba46)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.30 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I9} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I3} (1982Ba46)
147GD G 317.9 1 0.94 4 [E2] 0.0505
147GD G 553.9 1 0.41 3 [E1] 0.00376
147GD G 611.4 1 5.64 28 E2 0.00837 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.04 {I5}, A{-4}=0.01 {I7} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.06 {I7} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0070 15 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 5622.23 17 33/2+
147GD G 350.0 1 0.35 3 [E1] 0.01088
147GD G 593.0 3 0.10 3 [M1] 0.01644
147GD G 650.4 4 0.04 2 [E1] 0.00266
147GD G 673.6 1 0.31 4 [M1] 0.01197
147GD G 778.4 2 0.24 3 [E1] 0.00184
147GD L 5652.56 16 33/2-
147GD G 213.3 2 0.12 2 [M1] 0.240
147GD G 623.4 3 0.08 3 [E1] 0.00291
147GD G 680.8 1 0.33 4 [M1] 0.01166
147GD G 704.0 3 0.20 3 [E1] 0.00226
147GD G 808.8 2 0.14 3 [M1] 0.00763
147GD G 1422.8 1 1.08 6 [E2] 1.41E-3
147GD L 5742.30 16 33/2+
147GD G 470.0 1 0.42 3 [E1] 0.00542
147GD G 713.4 1 0.17 3 [M1] 0.01039
147GD G 770.7 3 0.11 6 [E1] 0.00188
147GD G 793.8 3 0.11 6 [M1] 0.00799
147GD G 898.3 1 0.33 6 [E1] 1.39E-3
147GD G 1124.4 1 1.14 8 [E2] 0.00216
147GD L 5767.45 16 35/2-
147GD G 385.4 2 0.44 10[M1] 0.0494
147GD G 738.2 3 1.10 8 [E1] 0.00205
147GD G 795.7 1 1.05 8 [E2] 0.00451
147GD G 923.8 3 0.17 10[E2] 0.00326
147GD L 5770.97 23 33/2-
147GD G 799.3 2 0.23 3 [M1] 0.00786
147GD cG M$E1 in Table III of 2020Br06 is a misprint, as confirmed in
147GD2cG e-mail reply from R. Broda
147GD L 5923.00 16 37/2-
147GD G 340.1 1 51.3 33 M1 0.0686
147GDF G FLAG=XY
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.23 {I1}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I2} (1982Br13)
147GD2 G ECC=0.07 1 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$1982Ba46 list average |a(K)exp=0.029 {I3} obtained for the 339-340
147GD2cG keV doublet and the A{-2}=-0.150 {I25} coefficient which indicate
147GD2cG stretched dipoles
147GD G 540.9 1 2.79 10[E2] 0.01137
147GD L 5959.42 17 35/2-
147GD G 306.9 1 0.20 6 [M1] 0.0900
147GD G 520.4 1 0.36 4 [E2] 0.01257
147GD L 6012.80 16 35/2+
147GD G 245.8 5 0.06 3 [E1] 0.0265
147GD G 270.4 1 1.63 13[M1] 0.1262
147GD G 360.2 1 1.35 10[E1] 0.01014
147GD G 390.5 1 0.78 3 [M1] 0.0478
147GD G 430.0 3 0.04 2 [E1] 0.00666
147GD G 630.7 2 0.18 4 [E1] 0.00284
147GD G 983.8 1 5.16 18[M1] 0.00475
147GD G 1064.3 1 5.65 23 E2 0.00242 Y
147GD cG E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 6621 level
147GD2cG (previously placed by 1982Ba46 and 1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.17 {I10} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0017 7 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 6081.48 17 35/2-
147GD G 428.7 3 0.15 3 [M1] 0.0375
147GD G 642.5 1 0.13 3 [E2] 0.00742
147GD G 699.0 4 0.11 6 [M1] 0.01092
147GD G 1109.7 2 0.13 2 [E2] 0.00222
147GD G 1237.6 2 0.53 6 [E2] 0.00179
147GD L 6181.27 17 35/2+
147GD G 168.6 2 0.13 3 [M1] 0.459
147GD G 410.4 3 0.09 3 [E1] 0.00743
147GD G 559.1 3 0.17 3 [M1] 0.0191
147GD G 1152.1 1 0.30 6 [M1] 0.00327
147GD G 1232.7 1 0.76 7 [E2] 0.00181
147GD L 6315.87 16 37/2+
147GD G 303.1 2 0.28 4 [M1] 0.0930
147GD G 548.5 2 0.62 9 [E1] 0.00384
147GD G 733.2 3 0.28 4 [E1] 0.00208
147GD G 1286.7 1 5.49 19(E2) 1.67E-3 E
147GD cG E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 6236 level
147GD2cG (previously placed by 1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.17 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I22} (1982Br13)
147GD L 6322.17 17 35/2+
147GD G 700.0 2 0.17 3 [M1] 0.01088
147GD cG M$E1 in Table III of 2020Br06 is a misprint, as confirmed in
147GD2cG e-mail reply from R. Broda
147GD G 1293.0 1 0.43 6 [M1] 0.00251
147GD G 1373.5 1 0.15 2 [E2] 1.49E-3
147GD L 6373.23 18 37/2-
147GD G 192.2 3 0.10 3 [E1] 0.0504
147GD G 291.9 3 0.10 3 [M1] 0.1028
147GD G 413.7 2 0.28 7 [M1] 0.0411
147GD G 605.8 3 0.40 8 [M1] 0.01559
147GD G 790.3 2 0.88 9 [M1] 0.00808
147GD L 6463.91 16 37/2+
147GD G 282.6 1 0.83 9 [M1] 0.1121
147GD G 382.8 3 0.09 3 [E1] 0.00876
147GD G 504.6 1 0.20 6 [E1] 0.00462
147GD G 696.5 1 0.50 3 [E1] 0.00231
147GD G 880.8 1 0.42 7 [E1] 1.45E-3
147GD G 1434.7 1 2.90 10[E2] 1.39E-3
147GD L 6471.46 16 39/2-
147GD G 155.5 3 0.06 2 [E1] 0.0888 14
147GD G 548.4 1 15.7 7 M1 0.0200 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.03 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.01 {I3} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.017 2 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 703.9 1 0.34 6 [E2] 0.00597
147GD G 888.5 1 0.56 3 [E2] 0.00354
147GD L 6567.89 16 37/2+
147GD G 554.8 3 0.08 3 [M1] 0.0194
147GD G 645.0 1 0.46 6 [E1] 0.00271
147GD G 800.5 1 0.23 6 [E1] 1.74E-3
147GD G 984.8 1 2.54 17
147GD cG E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 5557 level
147GD2cG (uncertainly placed by 1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.36 {I13}, A{-4}=0.28 {I18} (1982Br13) for this and 984 {I1}
147GD2cG at 6906 level
147GD G 1538.8 1 0.30 4 [E2] 1.26E-3
147GD L 6621.32 16 39/2+
147GD G 157.5 1 1.45 7 (M1) 0.555 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.6 2 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.10 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.08 {I25} (1982Br13)
147GD G 248.1 2 0.39 7 [E1] 0.0258
147GD G 299.1 1 0.67 4 [E2] 0.0608
147GD G 440.1 1 0.24 3 [E2] 0.0197
147GD G 608.5 1 13.8 8 E2 0.00847
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG E$|g ray replaced at this level by 2020Br06 from 5557 level
147GD2cG (previously placed by 1982Ba46 and 1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.27 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I3} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.11 {I5} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.007 1 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 698.3 1 18.7 8 E1 0.00230
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.32 {I5}, A{-4}=0.15 {I8} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.16 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0015 5 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 853.9 3 0.10 4 [M2] 0.01748
147GD G 1038.3 1 0.33 17[M2] 0.01035
147GD L 6658.22 17 39/2-
147GD G 285.2 3 0.53 7 [M1] 0.1094
147GD G 576.9 3 0.18 4 [E2] 0.00966
147GD G 698.9 1 0.33 1 [E2] 0.00607
147GD L 6697.28 16 37/2+
147GD G 375.0 2 0.09 2 [M1] 0.0531
147GD G 929.8 1 0.62 6 [E1] 1.30E-3
147GD G 1114.3 1 0.84 4 [E1] 9.33E-4
147GD G 1668.2 1 0.15 3 [E2] 1.14E-3
147GD L 6721.23 17 37/2-
147GD G 798.0 3 0.17 6 [M1] 0.00789
147GD G 1138.2 1 0.41 3 [M1] 0.00336
147GD L 6723.18 17 39/2-
147GD G 800.1 1 0.11 3 [M1] 0.00784
147GD G 1140.2 1 0.40 3 [E2] 0.00210
147GD L 6833.58 17 37/2-
147GD G 518.1 2 0.29 4 [E1] 0.00435
147GD G 820.8 1 0.83 6 [E1] 1.66E-3
147GD G 1250.5 4 0.23 10[M1] 0.00270
147GD L 6838.61 16 39/2+
147GD G 374.8 1 0.60 13[M1] 0.0532
147GD G 915.5 1 4.06 13 E1 1.34E-3
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I14} (1982Br13)
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.001 (1982Br13)
147GD L 6894.69 16 39/2+
147GD G 173.4 1 0.13 3 [E1] 0.0663
147GD G 326.8 1 0.60 6 [M1] 0.0762
147GD G 423.2 1 0.52 7 [E1] 0.00691
147GD G 430.8 1 0.24 4 [M1] 0.0370
147GD G 578.7 1 0.20 3 [M1] 0.01748
147GD G 971.6 1 4.64 17[E1] 1.20E-3
147GD L 6906.82 16 41/2+
147GD G 12.1 0.024 1 [M1] 158.1 B S
147GD G 68.0 1 0.08 2 M1 6.12 X
147GD2 G ECC=5 2 (2020Br06)
147GD G 248.4 1 0.50 6 [E1] 0.0258
147GD G 285.4 1 11.4 4 M1 0.1092
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I3}, A{-4}=0.02 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I3} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.075 16 (1982Ba46)
147GD2 G ECC=0.10 3 (2020Br06)
147GD G 435.3 1 12.6 6 (E1) 0.00647 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4} (1982Ba46, for 435.3|g+434.5|g)
147GD3 G EKC=0.009 4 (1982Ba46)
147GD cG EKC$for 435.3|g+434.5|g)
147GD cG M$435.3|g+434.5|g: 1982Ba46 state mult=E1 for one
147GD2cG component and mult=E2 for the other. From the proposed
147GD3cG level scheme, |D|p(434.5|g)=no, leaving mult(435.3|g)=E1.
147GD G 591.1 1 3.30 13(E2) 0.00909 Y
147GD3 G EKC=0.002 3 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 6936.83 16 39/2+
147GD G 239.6 1 1.03 7 [M1] 0.1748
147GD G 369.0 1 3.02 18[M1] 0.0554
147GD G 465.4 1 0.54 6 [E1] 0.00554
147GD G 472.7 3 0.03 2 [M1] 0.0292
147GD G 620.9 1 0.15 2 [M1] 0.01466
147GD G 924.1 1 0.71 6 [E2] 0.00325
147GD G 1013.8 3 0.20 4 [E1] 1.11E-3
147GD L 7018.18 21 39/2-
147GD G 1095.1 2 0.32 3 [M1] 0.00368
147GD L 7035.34 16 41/2+
147GD G 140.6 1 0.17 2 [M1] 0.764
147GD G 196.6 1 0.51 3 [M1] 0.300
147GD G 414.0 1 14.6 6 M1+E2 0.032 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.06 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I3} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.04 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.033 7 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 571.5 1 1.06 10[E2] 0.00989
147GD G 719.4 1 0.40 4 [E2] 0.00568
147GD L 7124.46 18 39/2-
147GD G 660.4 1 0.18 4 [E1] 0.00258
147GD L 7126.75 17 39/2-
147GD G 403.5 1 0.43 4 [M1] 0.0439
147GD G 1203.7 1 1.67 10[M1] 0.00295
147GD L 7182.84 17 39/2+
147GD G 809.6 2 0.22 3 [E1] 1.70E-3
147GD G 860.7 4 0.08 4 [E2] 0.00379
147GD G 867.0 1 0.72 6 [M1] 0.00645
147GD L 7212.67 17 41/2-
147GD G 317.8 1 0.35 4 [E1] 0.01379
147GD G 374.2 1 1.05 7 [E1] 0.00925
147GD G 741.3 1 1.45 8 [M1] 0.00945
147GD L 7275.45 17 41/2-
147GD G 1352.6 1 0.59 6 [E2] 1.53E-3
147GD L 7307.72 17 39/2-
147GD G 739.8 4 0.09 3 [E1] 0.00204
147GD G 843.5 4 0.13 3 [E1] 1.57E-3
147GD G 991.8 1 1.48 9 [E1] 1.15E-3
147GD L 7352.50 17 41/2+
147GD G 514.0 1 0.62 7 [M1] 0.0236
147GD L 7386.14 17 37/2-
147GD G 1803.2 1 0.30 3 [M1] 1.38E-3
147GD G 2004.2 5 0.06 2 [E2] 1.00E-3
147GD L 7389.40 17 43/2+
147GD G 177.0 3 0.20 6 [E1] 0.0628
147GD G 354.0 1 0.79 6 [M1] 0.0617
147GD G 482.6 1 9.95 23 M1+E2 0.022
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.28 {I10}, A{-4}=0.00 {I10} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.12 {I4} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.017 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 768.3 3 0.09 3 [E2] 0.00488
147GD L 7396.18 16 41/2+
147GD G 459.5 1 0.22 6 [M1] 0.0314
147GD G 501.5 1 0.49 6 [M1] 0.0251
147GD G 557.6 1 0.31 3 [M1] 0.0192
147GD G 675.0 3 0.07 3 [M2] 0.0337
147GD G 698.8 1 0.29 4 [E2] 0.00608
147GD G 738.0 1 0.14 3 [E1] 0.00205
147GD G 924.7 1 0.92 6 [E1] 1.32E-3
147GD G 1080.5 3 0.10 3 [E2] 0.00234
147GD L 7530.94 17 41/2+
147GD G 512.7 3 0.18 3 [E1] 0.00445
147GD G 636.3 1 0.81 9 [M1] 0.01379
147GD G 692.3 1 0.84 9 [M1] 0.01118
147GD G 909.6 1 0.86 4 [M1] 0.00574
147GD L 7596.10 16 39/2-
147GD G 560.9 1 0.12 3 [E1] 0.00365
147GD G 702.0 7 0.08 3 [E1] 0.00227
147GD G 762.7 1 0.17 4 [M1] 0.00881
147GD G 1132.1 1 0.24 6 [E1] 9.09E-4
147GD G 2013.0 1 0.42 3 [E2] 1.00E-3
147GD L 7619.79 17 41/2+
147GD G 312.0 4 0.04 2 [E1] 0.01444
147GD G 584.5 2 0.21 4 [M1] 0.01705
147GD G 781.3 2 0.33 6 [M1] 0.00831
147GD G 998.5 2 0.14 4 [M1] 0.00459
147GD G 1155.8 1 0.30 6 [E2] 0.00205
147GD L 7645.97 17 39/2-
147GD G 1723.0 3 0.08 2 [M1] 1.47E-3
147GD G 2063.0 1 0.59 3 [E2] 9.94E-4
147GD L 7666.31 17 41/2-
147GD G 539.4 3 0.26 9 [M1] 0.0209
147GD G 1007.8 3 0.09 3 [M1] 0.00449
147GD G 1194.9 1 1.42 8 [M1] 0.00300
147GD L 7669.68 17 39/2-
147GD G 73.7 3 0.03 1 [M1] 4.85 9
147GD G 283.5 1 0.11 2 [M1] 0.1112
147GD G 1011.4 3 0.09 3 [M1] 0.00445
147GD G 1198.0 3 0.13 3 [M1] 0.00298
147GD G 1709.8 3 0.08 3 [E2] 1.11E-3
147GD G 2086.8 1 0.83 3 [E2] 9.91E-4
147GD L 7692.11 19 41/2+
147GD G 384.5 3 0.06 2 [E1] 0.00867
147GD G 797.5 2 0.11 3 [M1] 0.00790
147GD G 1070.6 2 0.20 3 [M1] 0.00389
147GD L 7705.92 17 39/2-
147GD G 1047.5 2 0.22 6 [M1] 0.00409
147GD G 2122.9 1 0.09 2 [E2] 9.88E-4
147GD L 7718.56 17 39/2-
147GD G 1402.7 3 0.09 1 [E1] 7.55E-4
147GD G 1795.2 5 0.07 2 [M1] 1.39E-3
147GD G 2135.6 1 0.07 2 [E2] 9.87E-4
147GD L 7768.69 19 39/2-
147GD G 2185.7 1 0.17 3 [E2] 9.85E-4
147GD L 7771.94 17 43/2+
147GD G 419.7 3 0.12 3 [M1] 0.0396
147GD G 736.6 1 0.81 7 [M1] 0.00960
147GD G 865.2 3 0.12 3 [M1] 0.00648
147GD L 7800.35 17 39/2-
147GD G 1079.1 2 0.14 6 [M1] 0.00381
147GD G 1329.0 3 0.11 3 [M1] 0.00236
147GD G 1877.5 1 0.70 4 [M1] 1.32E-3
147GD G 2217.2 1 0.17 3 [E2] 9.84E-4
147GD L 7801.42 16 41/2-
147GD G 109.0 3 0.11 3 [E1] 0.232
147GD G 205.4 3 0.30 4 [M1] 0.266
147GD G 526.1 3 0.25 7 [M1] 0.0222
147GD G 618.7 1 0.22 3 [E1] 0.00296
147GD cG M$M1 in Table III of 2020Br06 is a misprint, as confirmed in
147GD2cG e-mail reply from R. Broda
147GD G 674.8 4 0.08 4 [M1] 0.01192
147GD G 765.9 1 0.28 3 [E1] 0.00190
147GD G 864.6 1 1.90 8 [E1] 1.50E-3
147GD G 894.6 1 1.40 13[E1] 1.40E-3
147GD G 906.7 1 2.15 10[E1] 1.37E-3
147GD G 962.9 1 0.31 6 [E1] 1.22E-3
147GD G 967.6 3 0.55 11[E2] 0.00295
147GD G 1104.3 4 0.55 11[M2] 0.00880
147GD G 1180.2 1 4.20 17[E1] 8.56E-4
147GD L 7825.71 16 41/2-
147GD G 119.8 3 0.08 4 [M1] 1.202 19
147GD G 229.7 1 0.49 7 [M1] 0.196
147GD G 517.8 1 0.32 4 [M1] 0.0231
147GD G 550.3 1 0.24 6 [M1] 0.0198
147GD G 699.0 3 0.12 4 [M1] 0.01092
147GD G 701.1 1 0.08 2 [M1] 0.01084
147GD G 790.3 1 2.19 7 [E1] 0.00179
147GD G 888.7 3 0.28 7 [E1] 1.42E-3
147GD G 919.0 3 0.19 4 [E1] 1.33E-3
147GD G 987.3 3 0.10 3 [E1] 1.16E-3
147GD G 1102.4 5 0.07 3 [M1] 0.00362
147GD G 1167.9 1 0.29 3 [M1] 0.00316
147GDF G FL=6658.22
147GD cG E$somewhat poor fit, level-energy difference=1167.5
147GD G 1204.5 1 0.75 9 [E1] 8.35E-4
147GD G 1354.0 1 0.15 3 [M1] 0.00227
147GD G 1902.7 1 0.89 4 [E2] 1.03E-3
147GD L 7874.04 16 41/2-
147GD G 48.3 0.64 9 M1 2.61 B S
147GD G 72.7 1 1.4 3 M1 5.05 X
147GD2 G ECC=6 2 (2020Br06)
147GD G 73.7 1 0.18 6 M1 4.85 X
147GD2 G ECC=5 3 (2020Br06)
147GD G 105.5 3 0.04 2 (M1) 1.73 3 X
147GD2 G ECC=2.9 14 (2020Br06)
147GD G 155.5 1 0.15 3 M1 0.576 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.9 3 (2020Br06)
147GD G 168.2 3 0.04 1 M1 0.462 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.6 3 (2020Br06)
147GD G 204.4 1 0.91 9 (M1) 0.270 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.22 6 (2020Br06)
147GD G 207.7 1 0.83 6 M1 0.258 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.38 15 (2020Br06)
147GD G 228.1 1 0.73 6 M1 0.200 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.25 7 (2020Br06)
147GD G 278.0 1 0.17 9 [M1] 0.1171
147GD G 488.0 1 0.19 3 [E2] 0.01488
147GD G 566.3 1 0.41 3 [M1] 0.0185
147GD G 598.7 1 0.26 6 [M1] 0.01605
147GD G 691.1 1 0.42 3 [E1] 0.00235
147GD cG M$M1 in Table III of 2020Br06 is a misprint, as confirmed in
147GD2cG e-mail reply from R. Broda
147GD G 747.2 1 1.73 6 [M1] 0.00927
147GD G 749.7 5 0.07 2 [M1] 0.00919
147GD G 838.7 1 4.84 14 E1 1.59E-3 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.002 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 855.8 2 0.20 3 [M1] 0.00665
147GD G 937.2 1 4.00 19 E1 1.28E-3 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0012 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 967.1 1 2.64 17 E1 1.21E-3 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0018 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 979.2 1 1.97 13[E1] 1.18E-3
147GD G 1035.4 1 0.72 7 [E1] 1.06E-3
147GD G 1040.4 1 0.55 9 [E2] 0.00253
147GD G 1215.7 3 0.11 4 [M1] 0.00288
147GD G 1252.7 1 3.74 13[E1] 8.03E-4
147GD G 1951.1 1 6.79 24 E2 1.01E-3
147GDF G FLAG=YE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.20 {I28}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I36} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.23 {I6} (1982Ba46)
147GD L 7903.57 17 41/2-
147GD G 721.3 5 0.04 2 [E1] 0.00215
147GD G 1065.0 3 0.11 3 [E1] 1.01E-3
147GD G 1980.6 1 0.41 3 [E2] 1.01E-3
147GD L 7917.09 18 41/2-
147GD G 247.3 2 0.11 3 [M1] 0.1605
147GD G 1994.1 1 0.21 3 [E2] 1.00E-3
147GD L 7964.00 16 43/2-
147GD G 162.4 3 0.09 4 [M1] 0.510
147GD G 297.8 1 0.23 3 [M1] 0.0975
147GD G 344.0 3 0.22 3 [E1] 0.01135
147GD G 433.1 1 1.13 9 [E1] 0.00655
147GD G 567.9 1 0.56 4 [E1] 0.00356
147GD G 574.5 1 1.07 6 [E1] 0.00347
147GD G 656.3 1 0.24 3 [E2] 0.00705
147GD G 751.3 1 0.55 9 [M1] 0.00914
147GD G 837.0 4 0.06 3 [E2] 0.00403
147GD G 928.6 1 2.30 17[E1] 1.31E-3
147GD G 1057.1 1 8.74 23 E1 1.02E-3 Y
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.20 {I9} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.0008 9 (1982Ba46)
147GD L 7994.30 16 43/2-
147GD G 30.4 0.65 8 [M1] 10.24 B S
147GD G 77.2 3 0.04 1 [M1] 4.24 8 B S
147GD G 90.8 1 0.09 2 [M1] 2.66
147GD G 120.2 1 22.3 17 M1 1.191 X
147GD2 G ECC=1.05 18 (2020Br06)
147GD G 168.6 1 2.67 11 [M1] 0.459
147GD G 192.9 1 3.23 17 D E
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.18 {I12}, A{-4}=0.07 {I15} (1982Br13)
147GD G 193.9 5 0.02 1 [E2] 0.246
147GD G 288.3 1 0.17 6 [E2] 0.0682
147GD G 302.4 3 0.06 3 [E1] 0.01561
147GD G 327.9 1 0.63 8 [M1] 0.0755
147GD G 374.5 1 0.30 6 [E1] 0.00923
147GD G 463.3 1 1.58 9 [E1] 0.00560
147GD G 598.2 1 1.91 10[E1] 0.00318
147GD G 605.0 1 2.88 15(E1) 0.00310 Y
147GDB G EKC=0.006 2 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 641.8 1 0.26 4 [E1] 0.00274
147GD G 686.7 1 0.55 4 [E2] 0.00633
147GD G 781.7 1 1.58 8 [M1] 0.00830
147GD G 867.4 3 0.20 6 [E2] 0.00373
147GD G 958.9 1 4.00 20 E1 1.23E-3 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.0019 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 1087.4 1 3.62 11 E1 9.73E-4
147GD L 8097.17 17 43/2+
147GD G 884.7 3 0.09 3 [E1] 1.43E-3
147GD G 1061.9 1 0.65 3 [M1] 0.00396
147GD G 1190.2 1 0.21 2 [M1] 0.00303
147GD L 8126.03 17 43/2+
147GD G 354.0 3 0.04 2 [M1] 0.0617
147GD G 773.6 1 0.42 7 [M1] 0.00851
147GD G 913.3 1 0.22 2 [E1] 1.35E-3
147GD G 1090.7 1 1.59 4 [M1] 0.00372
147GD G 1219.2 1 1.31 4 [M1] 0.00287
147GD L 8153.49 17 45/2+
147GD G 381.5 1 0.55 6 [M1] 0.0508
147GD G 764.1 1 5.61 17 M1 0.00877 Y
147GD3 G EKC=0.0067 16 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 1118.1 1 0.47 4 [E2] 0.00219
147GD L 8333.44 16 45/2+
147GD G 179.8 1 0.14 3 [M1] 0.384
147GD G 207.4 1 2.98 11 M1 0.259 X
147GD2 G ECC=0.27 6 (2020Br06)
147GD G 236.2 1 0.82 2 [M1] 0.182
147GD G 339.2 1 78.3 24 E1 0.01174
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=-0.06 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I7} (1982Br13)
147GD2 G ECC LT 0.03 (2020Br06)
147GD cG M$1982Ba46 list average |a(K)exp=0.029 {I3} obtained for the 339-340
147GD2cG keV doublet and the A{-2}=-0.150 {I25} coefficient which indicate
147GD2cG stretched dipoles
147GD G 369.4 1 5.98 25 E1 0.00954 Y
147GD3 G EKC LT 0.009 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 561.6 1 0.24 3 [M1] 0.0188
147GD G 944.0 1 1.13 4 [M1] 0.00525
147GD G 1298.1 1 0.36 4 [E2] 1.64E-3
147GD G 1426.6 1 0.23 2 [E2] 1.40E-3
147GD L 8588.07 17 49/2+ 516 NS 20 M
147GD cL T$weighted average of 510 ns {I20} (1982Ha22) and 530 ns {I30}
147GDxcL (1979Ha15), 516 ns {I17} (adopted with minimum experimental
147GDxcL uncertainty). Others: 560 ns {I60} (1978Br15), 550 ns (1982Ba46).
147GD cL $Proposed configuration=|p(d{-5/2}{+-2}h{-11/2}{+2}){-10} ~#
147GD2cL |n(h{-11/2}{+-1}i{-13/2}f{-7/2}){-29/2}, with large oblate deformation
147GD2 L G=0.446 8 (1979Ha15)$ MOMM1=+10.9 2 (2020StZV)$
147GD2 L MOME2=-3.00 18 (2016St14)$
147GD cL $|b{-2}=-0.19 (1982Ha22)
147GD cL G,MOMM1$deduced by 2020StZV compilation based on g factor measured by
147GD2cL 1979Ha15
147GD cL MOME2$absolute value measured by 1982Ha22; sign deduced by
147GD2cL 1985Da20
147GD cL J$47/2+ is considered equally likely as 49/2+ by 1982Ha22
147GD2cL (from |g(|q,H,t))
147GD G 254.4 1 82.8 25 E2 0.1011 C
147GDF G FLAG=XYE
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.13 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5} (1982Br13)
147GD cG M$A{-2}=0.165 {I12} (1982Ba46)
147GD3 G EKC=0.075 14 (1982Ba46)
147GD2 G ECC=0.12 3 (2020Br06)
147GD G 434.5 1 5.78 42 E2 0.0204 C
147GDF G FLAG=X
147GD2 G ECC LT 0.03 (2020Br06)
147GD G 593.7 1 2.74 11 E3 0.0237 C
147GDF G FLAG=Y
147GDB G EKC=0.0016 3 (1982Ba46)
147GD G 623.8 3 0.13 3 [E3] 0.0205 C