146GD 146TB EC DECAY (24.1 S) 1981STZO,1989STZY,2011KO0816NDS 201609
146GD H TYP=FUL$AUT=Yu. KHAZOV, A. RODIONOV AND G. SHULYAK$
146GD2 H CIT=NDS 136, 163 (2016)$CUT=14-Jul-2016$
146GD c 1989StZY: {+146}Tb |e decay [from Ta(p,X), E(p)=600 MeV]; measured E|g,
146GD2c I|g, |g|g, |g(X-ray) coin. {+146}Gd deduced levels, J|p, branching,
146GD3c configurations. On-line mass-separator ISOLDE, Ge detectors.
146GD c 1981StZO: {+146}Tb |e decay [from {+151}Eu(|a,xn2p),{+152}Gd(|a,xnp),
146GD2c E=90-130 MeV]; measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g(X-ray) coin. {+146}Gd
146GD3c deduced levels, J|p, configuration. Cyclotron, Ge detectors.
146GD c 1974Ne01: {+146}Tb |e decay [from {+141}Pr({+12}C,7n), E=118 MeV];
146GD2c measured T{-1/2}, E|g, I|g, |g|g coin. {+146}Gd deduced levels, J|p.
146GD2c Isochronous cyclotron, Ge(Li) detectors.
146GD c 2011Ko08: {+146}Tb |e decay [from {+112}Sn({+40}Ar,3p3n), E=232 MeV];
146GD2c measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin. {+146}Gd deduced levels, log| {Ift}
146GD c Others: 1974Ne01, 1995GoZV, 1980To06.
146GD c Mainly, the level scheme is taken from 1989StZY and 1981StZO.
146GD2c However, the scheme in the fig. 1 (1989StZY) has three misprints:
146GD3c firstly, the 652.2|g, de-exciting the 3313.65 keV level, is replaced
146GD4c by 655.2|g by the evaluators on the basis of inconsistency with
146GD5c fitting result of the level energies to the measured E|g's, and also
146GD6c based on the 655.8|g in 1981StZO (the same experimental group).
146GD7c Secondly and thirdly, the energy sum 1834.9+1246.0=3080.9 keV of
146GD8c cascade |g's does not equal the crossover 3249.4|g from the 4719.33
146GD9c keV level. In 1981StZO, the corresponding E|g's are 1844.1 and 1296.7
146GDac keV. The evaluators replaced these E|g's by 1844.9 and 1296.0 keV in
146GDbc 1989StZY. Also, the cascade of 1844 and 1296 transitions was set in
146GDdc 2011Ko08. Apparently, {+146}Gd levels populated not only from the
146GDec J|p=5- isomer (T{-1/2}=24 s) in the decay of {+146}Tb, but from its
146GDfc ground state of J|p=1+ (T{-1/2}=8 s) (1981StZO,2011Ko08)
146GD cE TI$Net feeding is based on transition intensity balance
146GD2cE calculations at the levels as given by 1989StZY assuming uncertainty
146GD3cE equal to 10%. Due to the level scheme is incomplete the log| {Ift}
146GD4cE values are not very reliable.
146GD cG E$Weighted average from 1989StZY, 1981StZO and 1974Ne01 when
146GD2cG available. |DE|g=0.2 was assumed by evaluators for E|g's taken from
146GD3cG 1989StZY and 1981StZO, except otherwise noted.
146GD cG E(A)$|g lines placed by 1989StZY on the basis of E|g fit and
146GD2cG according to results of 1986Ya06
146GD cG TI$From 1989StZY; the evaluators suppose uncertainties of transition
146GD2cG intensities equal to 10% for all transitions.
146GD cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g's, normalized |h{+2}=0.9
146GD cL J From 1989StZY
146GD cL E(A)$State of |ph{-11/2}|nd{+-1}{-5/2} multiplet, populated by
146GD2cL > transition
146GD cL E(B)$State of |nh{-9/2}d{+-1}{-3/2} multiplet, populated by >
146GD2cL transition
146GD DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3a (10-Sep-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
146TB P 0.0+X 5- 24.1 S 5 8320 40
146TB cP E$X=150 {i100} from systematics, 2012Au07, Q(g.s.) from 2012Wa38
146GD N 1.0 1.0 1.0
146GD cN NR$from |S(I(|g+ce) to g.s.)=100
146GD PN 4
146GD G 987.6 4 10 3
146GD cG E from 1974Ne01
146GD L 0.0 0+ 48.27 D 9
146GD cL T$from 'Adopted Levels'
146GD L 1579.43 123- A
146GD G 1579.43 12 E3 0.00216 98
146GD2 G EKC=0.00178 13 (1995GoZV)
146GDS G K/T=0.001773 25$L/T=0.000261 4$M/T=5.69E-5 8
146GDS G N/T=1.307E-5 19$O/T=2.01E-6 3$P/T=1.275E-7 18
146GD cG $IPC/T=4.63E-5 {I7}
146GDS G KC=0.001777 25$LC=0.000262 4$MC=5.71E-5 8
146GDS G NC=1.310E-5 19$OC=2.01E-6 3$PC=1.278E-7 18$IPC=4.64E-5 7
146GD E 3.0 0.34 6.5 3.3
146GDS E EAV=2634 19$CK=0.0875 16$CL=0.01276 24$CM+=0.00369 7
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}>6.1 (2011Ko08)
146GD L 1971.98 142+
146GD G 1971.95 14 17
146GD E
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}>7.0 (2011Ko08)
146GD L 2611.75 184+
146GD G 1032.35 15 3.7
146GD E 1.33 0.274 6.4 1.60
146GDS E EAV=2145 19$CK=0.144 3$CL=0.0210 5$CM+=0.00608 13
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=6.09 {I15} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 2658.25 165- A
146GD G 1078.77 12 E2 0.00235 59
146GD2 G EKC=0.00199 17 (1995GoZV)
146GDS G K/T=0.00199 3$L/T=0.000283 4$M/T=6.15E-5 9
146GDS G N/T=1.411E-5 20$O/T=2.17E-6 3$P/T=1.376E-7 20
146GDS G KC=0.00199 3$LC=0.000284 4$MC=6.16E-5 9
146GDS G NC=1.414E-5 20$OC=2.17E-6 3$PC=1.379E-7 20
146GD E 28.5 6.06 5.1 34.6
146GDS E EAV=2123 19$CK=0.147 3$CL=0.0216 5$CM+=0.00623 13
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=4.92 {I10} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 2968.3 44+
146GD G 1388.9 3 0.63
146GD E 0.50 0.13 6.7 0.63
146GDS E EAV=1977 19$CK=0.173 4$CL=0.0254 6$CM+=0.00733 16
146GD L 2982.45 197- A
146GD G 324.16 14 1.1
146GD E 0.16 0.042 7.2 0.20
146GDS E EAV=1970 19$CK=0.175 4$CL=0.0256 6$CM+=0.00739 17
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}>6.12 (2011Ko08)
146GD L 2996.69 17 4- A
146GD G 1417.20 13 16
146GD E 11.9 3.14 5.3 15.0
146GDS E EAV=1964 19$CK=0.176 4$CL=0.0258 6$CM+=0.00745 17
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=5.24 {I5} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 3031.17 233+
146GD G 1059.1 3 10
146GD G 1451.8 3 0.36
146GD E 0.87 0.23 6.4 1.1
146GDS E EAV=1948 19$CK=0.179 4$CL=0.0263 6$CM+=0.00759 17
146GD L 3099.29 176- A
146GD G 116.80 14 0.9
146GD G 441.05 8 16.6
146GD E 13.6 3.87 5.2 17.5
146GDS E EAV=1916 19$CK=0.186 4$CL=0.0272 6$CM+=0.00787 18
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=5.29 {I5} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 3287.6 3 (3+)
146GD G 675.8 3 0.88
146GD E 0.45 0.15 6.6 0.60
146GDS E EAV=1827 19$CK=0.206 5$CL=0.0302 7$CM+=0.00873 20
146GD L 3313.65 245-
146GD G 655.33 24 3.8
146GD cG E$see General comments for {+146}Tb |e decay (24.1 s) data set.
146GD G 702.0 3 0.56
146GD E 3.3 1.1 5.7 4.4
146GDS E EAV=1815 19$CK=0.209 5$CL=0.0307 7$CM+=0.00886 20
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=5.81 {I9} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 3384.5 11 6-
146GD G 726.2 0.19 A
146GD E 0.15 0.052 7.0 0.20
146GDS E EAV=1782 19$CK=0.218 5$CL=0.0319 8$CM+=0.00921 21
146GD L 3412.2 4 (4)
146GD G 415.5 3 0.76
146GD E 0.59 0.21 6.4 0.80
146GDS E EAV=1769 19$CK=0.221 5$CL=0.0324 8$CM+=0.00936 22
146GD L 3423.38 183-
146GD G 1844.00 14 2.7
146GD cG E$see General comments for {+146}Tb |e decay (24.1 s) data set
146GD E 0.22 0.079 6.8 0.30
146GDS E EAV=1764 19$CK=0.222 5$CL=0.0326 8$CM+=0.00942 22
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}>5.77 (2011Ko08)
146GD L 3435.8 10 4+
146GD cL J$adopted by the evaluators on the basis of mult's, anisotropy; J=3
146GD2cL in 1989StZY.
146GD G 1463.8 0.63 A
146GD E 0.44 0.16 6.5 0.60
146GDS E EAV=1758 19$CK=0.224 5$CL=0.0328 8$CM+=0.00948 22
146GD L 3469.4 4
146GD G 811.1 3 1.1
146GD E 0.80 0.30 6.2 1.1
146GDS E EAV=1743 19$CK=0.228 6$CL=0.0334 8$CM+=0.00966 22
146GD L 3585.3 4
146GD G 2005.9 3 0.86
146GD E 0.64 0.26 6.3 0.90
146GDS E EAV=1689 19$CK=0.243 6$CL=0.0357 9$CM+=0.01031 24
146GD L 3908.5 3
146GD G 1297 0.40 A
146GD G 2329.0 3 0.75
146GD E 0.783 0.417 6.0 1.20
146GDS E EAV=1538 19$CK=0.292 7$CL=0.0429 10$CM+=0.0124 3
146GD L 4719.33 164- B
146GD G 1296.4 4 2.4
146GD cG E$see General comments for {+146}Tb |e decay (24.1 s) data set.
146GD G 1431.7 3 0.40
146GD G 1688.0 0.28 A
146GD G 2061.00 14 0.98
146GD G 2107.9 0.25 A
146GD G 3139.87 13 10.3
146GD E 6.61 7.99 4.5 14.6
146GDS E EAV=1165 19$CK=0.460 10$CL=0.0678 15$CM+=0.0196 5
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=4.88 {I6} (2011Ko08)
146GD L 4828.62 20 5- B
146GD G 1831.85 14 0.70
146GD G 2170.9 0.34 A
146GD G 3249.4 3 0.40
146GD E 0.589 0.811 5.5 1.40
146GDS E EAV=1115 19$CK=0.487 11$CL=0.0718 16$CM+=0.0208 5
146GD cE $Other: log| {Ift}=5.30 {I12} (2011Ko08)