143LA    143BA B- DECAY                1988FA03                  12NDS    201203
143LA  H TYP=FUL$AUT=E. BROWNE, J. K. TULI$CIT=NDS 113, 715 (2012)$
143LA2 H CUT=31-May-2011$
143LA c  Measured: |g (1988Fa03,1985Ra20,1984So18,1979Sc11,1979Bo26,
143LA2c  \1978Pa01), |g|g (1988Fa03,1979Sc11,1978Pa01), ce
143LA3c  (1988Fa03,1985Ra20,1979Sc11), |g(t) (1979Sc11), |b|g
143LAxc  (1981De25,1979Ke02,1978Pa01), |g|g(|q) (1988Fa03)
143LA c  Level scheme is that of 1988Fa03
143LA c  1985Ra20 report that in |b{+-} decay of {+143}Ba from {+143}Cs+{+143}Ba
143LA2c  source and from {+143}Ba source the ratio
143LA3c  R=I|g({+143}Cs+{+143}Ba)/I|g({+143}Ba) is different for |g's from
143LA4c  different levels of {+143}La. Assuming R=1.0 for |g from 211 level,
143LA5c  authors find R=1.00 {I5} for |g from 291.6 level, R=1.28 {I5} for 925
143LA6c  level, R=1.36 {I8} for 1010 level and R=1.46 {I7} for 1408 level. This
143LA7c  may mean that in {+143}Ba there exist two |b{+-} decaying isomeric
143LA8c  states with similar T{-1/2}. Both of them may be produced directly in
143LA9c  fission, but only the lower spin isomer (J|p=5/2-) may be produced in
143LAxc  the |b{+-} decay of 3/2+ {+143}Cs
143LA c  1997Gr09: measured I|b using total absorption |g-ray spectrometer
143LA2c  (TAGS) . The following pseudo-levels (with their I|b) were introduced:
143LA3c  1860 (0.55%), 2090 (1.22%), 2150 (1.40%), 2600 (0.88%), 2700 (0.64%),
143LA4c  2800 (0.30%), 2900 (0.32%), 3000 (0.23%), 3100 (0.18%), 3200 (0.21%),
143LA5c  3300 (0.13%), 3400 (0.19%), 3500 (0.10%), 3600 (0.02%), 3700 (0.01%),
143LA6c  3800 (0.01%), 3900 (0.01%), 4000 (0.004%)
143LA cB IB$From TAGS measurement of 1997Gr09, unless given otherwise. There is
143LA2cB 3.3% |b{+-} feeding of the levels above 2533 level as per the TAGS
143LA2cB results. Upper limit for |b{+-} feeding to {+143}La g.s. is 7.5% {I10}
143LAxcB (1988Fa03)
143LA DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2 (31-Mar-2008) 2008KiAA, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
143LA cG           |a(K)exp were normalized to |a(K)(E2) for 199.3|g in
143LA2cG {+144}Cs |b{+-} decay (1985Ra20), |a(L)exp(29.9|g) to |a(K)(E2) for
143LA3cG 117.1|g in {+143}Cs |b-decay (1979Sc11) and |a(K)=0.11 for 211|g
143LAxcG (1988Fa03)
143LA cG E,RI      From 1988Fa03, except where noted otherwise
143LA cG RI        For normalization of I|g see also 1983Re11
143LA cL J$From adopted levels
143BA  P 0.0         5/2-              14.5 S    3              4234      10
143LA  N 0.0249    29          1.0       1.0
143LA cN NR        From I(211|g)=24.9% {I29} (1984So18)
143LA  G 421.4      11.8      8
143LA  G 558.9      12.4      5
143LA  G 608.2      30.9      3
143LA  G 649.9      22.1      8
143LA  G 723.2      22.8      9
143LA  G 739.1      25.8      7
143LA  G 782.91     33.7      5
143LA  G 834.8      43.3      3
143LA  G 930.4      50.9      2
143LA  G 952.8      31.6      5
143LA  G 959.0      31.6      5
143LA  G 1456.7     52.8      2
143LA  G 1484.6     51.0      2
143LA  G 1645.1     37        1
143LA  G 2211.2     43        1
143LA  G 2258.8     62        1
143LA  G 2277.6     28        1
143LA  G 2386.9     29        1
143LA  G 2499.8     42.4      6
143LA  L 0.0         (7/2)+            14.2 M    1
143LA2 L %B-=100
143LA cL T         weighted average of 14.14 min {I16} (1981Ya06), 14.23 min
143LA2cL {I14} (1977Bj01), 14.0 min {I1} (1961Fr06)
143LA  B             8.5     LT             6.3  GT
143LAS B EAV=1812 19
143LA cB IB        <8.5% {I10} (1988Fa03).
143LA2cB I|b(0.0+29.81 level)=7 {I4} (1997Gr09) TAGS
143LA  L     29.81112(3/2)+
143LA  G 29.85     5 4        1E2                      243      1.23E+3   10
143LAS G L/T=0.781 9$M/T=0.174 4$N+/T=0.0415 10
143LAS G N/T=0.0365 9$O/T=0.00501 12$P/T=3.22E-6 7
143LA cG M         |a(L)exp=215 {I83} (renormalized by evaluator using
143LA2cG |a(K)(E2) for 117.1|g in {+143}Cs |b{+-} decay), L/M=5.7 {I6}
143LAxcG (1979Sc11),  L/M=4.0 (1985Ra20)
143LA cG TI        from |SI(|g+ce) feeding 29.9 level. Value is lower limit
143LA2cG since the 29.9 level could also be fed by |b decay. Note that I|g
143LA3cG gives I(|g+ce)=990 {I250}
143LA  L    208.347153/2+,5/2+
143LA  B             1.27                   7.1
143LAS B EAV=1714 19
143LA  G 178.51    2 121      1(M1)                    0.213
143LAS G KC=0.182 3$LC=0.0244 4$MC=0.00508 8$NC+=0.001312 19
143LAS G NC=0.001116 16$OC=0.000182 3$PC=1.416E-5 20
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.17 {I5}
143LA  G 208.35    2 43       1M1,E2                   0.147  8
143LAS G KC=0.1197 17$LC=0.022 6$MC=0.0047 14$NC+=0.0012 4
143LAS G NC=0.0010 3$OC=0.00016 4$PC=8.4E-6 9
143LA cG E         207.071 {I32} in 1979Sc11
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.163 {I49}, |a(K)=0.121 (M1), |a(K)=0.120 (E2)
143LA  L    211.482 7(5/2)+            0.69 NS   7
143LA  B             0.88                   7.2
143LAS B EAV=1713 19
143LA  G 3.1        1                                           47        12   S
143LA cG E         from level energies
143LA cG TI        from I|g of |g's feeding the 211 level seen in coincidence
143LA2cG with the 178 and 208 |g's
143LA  G 181.62    3 30.6     3(M1)                    0.203
143LAB G BM1W=0.000134 14
143LAS G KC=0.1739 25$LC=0.0233 4$MC=0.00484 7$NC+=0.001250 18
143LAS G NC=0.001064 15$OC=0.0001731 25$PC=1.351E-5 19
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.19 {I5} (1979Sc11), 0.131 {I40} (1985Ra20)
143LA  G 211.475   7 1000      M1+(E2)   +0.07   3     0.1343
143LAB G BM1W=0.0028 3$BE2W=0.17 15
143LAS G KC=0.1149 16$LC=0.01539 23$MC=0.00320 5$NC+=0.000826 12
143LAS G NC=0.000703 11$OC=0.0001143 17$PC=8.90E-6 13
143LA cG E         from 1979Bo19
143LA cG RI$I|g=24.9% {I29} (1984So18)
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.11 {I1} (1979Sc11); |a(K)exp=0.10 {I3},
143LA2cG |a(L)exp=0.013 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.002 {I1} (1985Ra20), |a(L)exp=0.014
143LAxcG {I3} (1988Fa03). |a(L)exp suggests predominately M1.
143LA cG MR        from |g|g(|q) (1988Fa03)
143LA  L    291.27613(5/2)+
143LA  G 261.47    3 67.0     7M1,E2                   0.0745 19
143LAS G KC=0.062 4$LC=0.0102 16$MC=0.0021 4$NC+=0.00054 9
143LAS G NC=0.00047 8$OC=7.3E-5 9$PC=4.4E-6 7
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.047 {I5} (1988Fa03), 0.041 {I12} (1985Ra20), 0.09
143LA2cG {I2} (1979Sc11) |a(K)=0.0658 (M1), |a(K)=0.0584 (E2)
143LA  G 291.287   20325      3M1+E2     0.99          0.0544
143LAS G KC=0.0453 7$LC=0.00718 10$MC=0.001511 22$NC+=0.000384 6
143LAS G NC=0.000329 5$OC=5.18E-5 8$PC=3.28E-6 5
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.039 {I2}, K/L=4.9 {I7} (1988Fa03); |a(K)exp=0.038
143LA2cG {I12} (1985Ra20); 0.053 {I5} (1979Sc11); |a(K)=0.0496 (M1),
143LAxcG |a(K)=0.0417 (E2)
143LA cG MR        from |g|g(|q) |d=0.995-0.975 (1988Fa03); from K/L |d>2
143LA cG E         from 1979Bo19
143LA  L     424.93 4
143LA  B             0.55                   7.3
143LAS B EAV=1613 19
143LA cB IB$0.20 {I4} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 133.7      10.8      2                                 1.1       3
143LA  G 424.85     519       1
143LA  L     461.99 5
143LA  B             0.33                   7.5
143LAS B EAV=1596 19
143LA cB IB$0.32 {I5} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 250.4      12.7      2
143LA  G 432.15     512.4     7
143LA  G 462.2      13.8      2
143LA  L    465.90313(5/2)+
143LA  B             0.33                   7.5
143LAS B EAV=1594 19
143LA cB IB$1.5 {I2} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 174.6      15.3      2
143LA  G 254.39    2 97       1M1,E2                   0.0808 15
143LAS G KC=0.067 4$LC=0.0111 19$MC=0.0024 5$NC+=0.00060 10
143LAS G NC=0.00051 9$OC=8.0E-5 11$PC=4.8E-6 7
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.061 {I6} (1988Fa03), 0.09 {I2} (1979Sc11),
143LA2cG |a(K)=0.0710 (M1), |a(K)=0.0639 (E2)
143LA  G 257.5      15.5      2
143LA  G 435.99     372       3
143LA  G 465.87     356       1
143LA  L    642.89915+
143LA  B             0.30                   7.5
143LAS B EAV=1512 19
143LA cB IB$1.6 {I2} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 176.89    2 48.5     5M1,E2                   0.24   3
143LAF G FL=465.903
143LAS G KC=0.195 9$LC=0.039 15$MC=0.008 4$NC+=0.0021 8
143LAS G NC=0.0018 7$OC=0.00028 9$PC=1.34E-5 12
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.21 {I3} (for 177|g+178|g) (1979Sc11), 0.242 {I75}
143LA2cG (1985Ra20), |a(K)=0.1886 (M1), |a(K)=0.204 (E2)
143LA  G 217.7      13.9      2
143LA  G 351.9      15.1      4
143LA  G 431.20     4111      4M1,E2                    0.018  3
143LAF G FL=211.482
143LAS G KC=0.0154 25$LC=0.00221 12$MC=0.000461 22$NC+=0.000118 7
143LAS G NC=0.000101 6$OC=1.61E-5 12$PC=1.14E-6 23
143LA cG M         |a(K)exp=0.012 {I2}, |a(L)exp=0.0027 {I11} (1988Fa03) (for
143LA2cG doublet) |a(K)=0.018 (M1), |a(K)=0.013 (E2)
143LA cG E         431.384 {I13} from 1979Bo19
143LA  G 613.69     431.3     9
143LAF G FL=29.811
143LA  G 642.77     543       2
143LA  L     666.98 4
143LA  B             0.30                   7.5
143LAS B EAV=1500 19
143LA cB IB$0.47 {I7} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 637.12     811.4     8
143LA  G 667.00     433.7     4
143LA  L     699.33 3
143LA  B             0.30                   7.4
143LAS B EAV=1485 19
143LA cB IB$0.8 {I1} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 233.5      12.4      2
143LA  G 408.11     516.0     4
143LA  G 488.3      13.9      3
143LAF G FL=211.482
143LA  G 490.9      30.6      2
143LA  G 669.38     434.6     4
143LA  G 699.4      25.6      6
143LA  L     830.67 3
143LA  B             1.76                   6.6
143LAS B EAV=1424 19
143LA cB IB$1.1 {I2} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 364.81     713.5     5
143LA  G 619.23     434.8     9
143LA  G 621.5      112.1     8
143LAF G FL=208.347
143LA  G 800.7      233       7
143LA  G 830.4      44.7      2
143LA  L     883.90 4
143LA  G 854.01     474       1
143LA  G 884.11     615       3
143LA  L    924.94516(5/2)-
143LA  B             10.46                  5.8
143LAS B EAV=1381 19
143LA cB IB$9.5 {I11} from intensity imbalance
143LA  G 281.34     511.2     2
143LAF G FL=642.899
143LA  G 459.05     811.9     7
143LA  G 633.70     340.7     5
143LA  G 713.41     618.0     9
143LA  G 895.18     3164      1
143LA  G 925.04     3200      2E1
143LAS G CC=0.000931 13$KC=0.000806 12$LC=9.98E-5 14$MC=2.05E-5 3$NC+=5.30E-6 8
143LAS G NC=4.51E-6 7$OC=7.34E-7 11$PC=5.78E-8 8
143LA cG M         ce(K)