142TB 142TB IT DECAY (303 MS) 2006TA08 11NDS 201108
142TB H TYP=FUL$AUT=T.D. Johnson, D. Symochko(a), M. Fadil(b), and J.K. Tuli$
142TB2 H CIT=NDS 112, 1949 (2011)$CUT=1-Jun-2010$
142TB c {+142}Tb isotope formed by {+92}Mo({+54}Fe,n3p) reaction at 250 MeV.
142TB2c The recoil products were separated in mass/charge ratio by recoil-mass
142TB3c separator (RMS). Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, conversion electrons using
142TB4c two segmented Ge clover detectors for |g rays and Si(Li) conversion
142TB5c electron spectrometer (BESCA) at Oak Ridge HRIBF.
142TB C 1991Fi03: measured G, GG, XG, ^Xp, T1/2.
142TB DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2b (20-Jan-2009) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
142TB cG $Theoretical conversion coefficients are from BrIcc code
142TB P 279.8 4 5- 303 MS 17
142TB N 0.889 75 1.0
142TB cN NR$from %IT=100
142TB cN NR$ Calculated using relative intensities from 2006TA08
142TB2cN and internal conversion coefficients from BrIcc
142TB L 0 1+
142TB L 181.8 3 2+
142TB G 181.8 3 10 4 M1+E2 0.36 5
142TB2 G EKC=0.2 1 $ ELC=0.07 1 $ K/L=3.1 3
142TBS G K/T=0.20 4$L/T=0.049 12$M/T=0.011 4$N+/T=0.0029 8
142TBS G N/T=0.0025 7$O/T=0.00036 8$P/T=1.4E-5 5
142TB L 211.5 3 3+
142TB G 29.9 9 0.1 LTM1+E2 2.5E2 25 ?
142TBS G L/T=0.8 5$M/T=0.18 23$N+/T=0.05 6
142TBS G N/T=0.04 6$O/T=0.005 7$P/T=1.1E-5 13
142TB cG M$(M1) shown in figure 15 of 2006Ta08
142TB CG M$M1+ (6|+3)%E2 FROM IG(29.7G)/IG(68.5G) IN 181.9G GATED SPECTRUM
142TB2CG (1991FI03)
142TB G 211.5 3 100 6 E2 0.190
142TB2 G EKC=0.11 1 $ ELC=0.04 1 $ K/L=2.6 1
142TBS G K/T=0.1114 15$L/T=0.0375 6$M/T=0.00871 14$N+/T=0.00224 4
142TBS G N/T=0.00197 3$O/T=0.000268 4$P/T=6.45E-6 10
142TB L 279.7 5 5- 303 MS 17
142TB CL T$1991Fi03 give 303 MS 17 in the abstract but 303 MS 7 in the paper,
142TB2CL the latter is a misprint (as per priv comm from one of the authors).
142TB G 68.2 3 1.20 10M2 90.9 21
142TB2 G ECC=98 +23-10
142TB3 G EKC=61 5 (1991FI03)
142TBS G K/T=0.697 12$L/T=0.225 7$M/T=0.0533 17$N+/T=0.0143 5
142TBS G N/T=0.0124 4$O/T=0.00183 6$P/T=0.000100 4
142TB cG TI$119 {I+30-16} (2006Ta08)
142TB cG M$E3 shown in figure 15 of 2006Ta08 seems a misprint
142TB G 98.3 9 0.07 LTE3 48 3 ?
142TB2 G ECC<180$ ELC<2
142TBS G K/T=0.087 5$L/T=0.68 3$M/T=0.170 12$N+/T=0.043 4
142TBS G N/T=0.038 3$O/T=0.0048 4$P/T=6.6E-6 5
142TB cG M$M2 shown in figure 15 of 2006Ta08 seems a misprint