140LA 140BA B- DECAY 1990ME03 18NDS 201812
140LA H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 154, 1 (2018)$CUT=20-Nov-2018$
140LA c Measured: |g (1991Ch05,1990Me03, 1984Ol08, 1982Ad02,1979Bo26,
140LA2c 1977De34,1977Ge12,1976Li06,1975Ha50,1970Ke09,1969Ka33),
140LA2c ce (1991Ch05,1982Ad02,1966GeZZ,1961Ge01), |g|g and ce|g
140LA3c (1982Ad02,1965Bu07,1961Ge01,1959Bo61), |g|g(|q)
140LA4c (1982Ad02,1965Zu03,1965Bu07,1964Ag01), |g(t) (1982Ad02,1965Bu07), |b
140LA5c and |b|g (1965Bu07,1957Pe20,1956Se28), |b|g(|q) (1964Ag01)
140LA c Measured I(K|a| x ray)=10.0 {I20}, I(K|b| x ray)|<2.0 {I3} (1969Ka33);
140LAxc L| x ray, K| x ray (1991Ch05).
140LAxc Calculated from this decay scheme data (absolute intensity per 100
140LAxc decays): I(K|a| x ray)=1.249 {I34}, I(K|b| x ray)=0.301 {I10};
140LA c The level scheme is that of 1990Me03
140LA c As there are no levels known in between the highest observed level at
140LA2c 581 keV up to more than 1000 keV allowed by the Q(|b{+-}) value
140LA2c the level scheme can be incomplete
140LA cL T(A)$From 1965Bu07 (by delayed coin technique)
140LA cG M |a(K)exp were normalized to |a(K)(M1)=0.24 for 162.672|g
140LA cG RI From 1990Me03, except where noted otherwise.
140LA2cG 1977De34, 1984Ol08, and 1990Me03 all give precise values for
140LA2cG I|g that are in agreement to each other. Only 1990Me03 give
140LA2cG values for all I|g's (while the other two only for the five most
140LA2cG intense I|g's) reason for which they were adopted here
140LA cG E(B),RI(B)$Assignment to {+140}Ba decay is uncertain
140LA cG E(C)$Differ by 3|s or more from calculated value
140LA DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
140LA DG MR$IF NO VALUE GIVEN IT WAS ASSUMED MR=1.00 FOR E2/M1,
140LA2DG MR=1.00 FOR E3/M2 AND MR=0.10 FOR THE OTHER MULTIPOLARITIES
140LA cL J Adopted values
140BA P 0.0 0+ 12.751 D 4 1047 8
140LA N 0.2439 22 1.0 1.0
140LA cN NR Absolute I(537|g)=24.39% {I22} (1977De34), no |b{+-} to 3-
140LAxcN (g.s.)
140LA PN 3
140LA G 183.83 90.004 2 B
140LA cG %I|g=0.0010 {I5}
140LA G 275.18 180.0015 6 B
140LA cG %I|g=0.0004 {I2}
140LA G 699.89 130.0034 9 B
140LA cG %I|g=0.0008 {I2}
140LA L 0.0 3- 1.67858 D 21
140LA2 L %B-=100
140LA cL T,%B-$Adopted values
140LA L 29.9677 82- 0.25 NS 4
140LA cL T from 1982Ad02. Other: |<0.42 ns (1965Bu07)
140LA B 20 11 8.91 24 1U
140LAS B EAV=361.6 32
140LA cB IB I(1020|b)/I(1006|b)=0.58 {I15} (1965Bu07)
140LA cB E$1030 {I30} (1965Bu07), 1020 (1959Bo61)
140LA G 29.966 1 57.8 17M1+(E2) 0.009 LE 5.37
140LA cG %I|g=14.1 {I4}
140LA cG RI$57.8 {I17} can not be confirmed neither as from 1977De34 as given by
140LA2cG 1994Pe19 nor from other reference. As I|g=60 {I4} from 1990Me03 would
140LA2cG produce negative |g feeding to g.s., this presumably determined
140LA2cG 1994Pe19 to adjust it to the value adopted here
140LAS G LC=4.26 6$MC=0.886 13
140LAS G NC=0.194 3$OC=0.0315 5$PC=0.00242 4
140LA cG M L:M:N=260 {I30}:53 {I6}:13 {I2}; L1/L2=13.8 {I34}, L1/L3=55
140LA2cG {I9} (1982Ad02); L1:L2:L3:M:N=20:2:1:10:5 (1951Co39); L/M+N=2.4 {I3}
140LAxcG (1959Bo61)
140LA cG E from 1970Ke09
140LA L 43.8132 181- 0.52 NS 14 A
140LA B 40 10 8.03 11
140LAS B EAV=344.6 33
140LA cB E$1020 (1965Bu07)
140LA G 13.846 155.0 7M1+E2 0.0100 55 54.4 18
140LA cG %I|g=1.22 {I17}
140LAS G LC=43.1 14$MC=9.0 3
140LAS G NC=1.97 7$OC=0.318 9$PC=0.0239 4
140LA cG RI I|g=4.69 {I12} (1991Ch05)
140LA cG E from 1970Ke09
140LA cG M L:M:N=212 {I40}:46 {I9}:12 {I2}, L1:L2:L3=1000 {I33}:106
140LAxcG {I11}:31 {I8} (1982Ad02)
140LA G 43.8 0.008 LT[E2] 44.0 ?
140LA cG %I|g=0.0010 {I10}
140LAS G KC=7.08 10$LC=28.9 4$MC=6.46 9
140LAS G NC=1.360 19$OC=0.188 3$PC=0.000465 7
140LA cG E from E(level) difference
140LA cG RI |g was not observed (1990Me03,1982Ad02). Others: 0.054 {I7}
140LA2cG (1991Ch05), 0.06 (1969Ka33), |<0.005 (1970Ke09); |<0.01 (1966Mo16)
140LA cG M from Adopted
140LA L 63.168 204-
140LA G 63.17 220.00012 6M1 4.06 7
140LA cG %I|g=0.00003 {I2}
140LAS G KC=3.47 6$LC=0.473 9$MC=0.0983 17
140LAS G NC=0.0216 4$OC=0.00351 6$PC=0.000271 5
140LA cG M from Adopted
140LA L 162.6585 82- 10 PS LE A
140LA B 3.8 2 9.30 3 1U
140LAS B EAV=310.3 31
140LA cB E$830 (1959Bo61), 870 (1965Bu07)
140LA G 99.49 20.00008 5
140LA cG %I|g=0.00002 {I1}
140LA G 118.837 3 0.25 3M1 0.662
140LA cG %I|g=0.061 {I7}
140LAS G KC=0.566 8$LC=0.0765 11$MC=0.01590 23
140LAS G NC=0.00349 5$OC=0.000568 8$PC=4.41E-5 7
140LA cG M |a(K)exp=0.57 {I11}
140LA G 132.687 1 0.83 2M1 0.486 C
140LA3 G FL=29.9677
140LA cG %I|g=0.202 {I5}
140LAS G KC=0.415 6$LC=0.0560 8$MC=0.01164 17
140LAS G NC=0.00256 4$OC=0.000416 6$PC=3.23E-5 5
140LA cG M |a(K)exp=0.41 {I6} (1982Ad02)
140LA G 162.660 1 25.5 3M1+(E2) 0.08 LE 0.276
140LA cG %I|g=6.21 {I9}
140LAS G KC=0.236 4$LC=0.0318 5$MC=0.00660 10
140LAS G NC=0.001451 22$OC=0.000236 4$PC=1.83E-5 3
140LA cG E from 1990Me03. Other: 162.369 {I6} (1979Bo26)
140LA cG M K:L:M=6.7 {I3}:1.00 {I6}:0.23 {I2} (1982Ad02); K:L:M=10:5:2
140LA2cG (1951Co39); K/L+M=3.5 {I8} (1959Bo61); L1/L2=13.3 {I7}, L1/L3=60 {I10}
140LAxcG (1966GeZZ)
140LA cG RI absolute I|g=6.21% {I8} (1977De34)
140LA L 467.5350 171- 7.7 PS LE A
140LA B 9.6 2 7.805 23
140LAS B EAV=181.0 29
140LA cB E$590 (1959Bo61), 594 (1965Bu07)
140LA G 304.849 3 17.6 2M1+(E2) +0.1 LE 0.0507
140LA2 G FLAG=C
140LA cG %I|g=4.29 {I6}
140LA2 G FL=162.6585
140LAS G KC=0.0434 6$LC=0.00574 8$MC=0.001191 17
140LAS G NC=0.000262 4$OC=4.27E-5 6$PC=3.35E-6 5
140LA cG RI absolute I|g=4.30% {I5} (1977De34)
140LA cG M,RI |a(K)exp=0.043 {I3}; K/L=9.9 {I26} (1982Ad02); L1/L2=14.6
140LA2cG {I7}, L1/L3|>23 (1966GeZZ); |a(K)exp=0.041 {I2} (1991Ch05)
140LA cG MR from |g|g(|q) (1982Ad02), see also 1965Bu07
140LA G 423.722 1 12.7 1 M1 0.0217
140LA2 G FL=43.8132
140LA cG %I|g=3.10 {I4}
140LAS G KC=0.0186 3$LC=0.00243 4$MC=0.000504 7
140LAS G NC=0.0001108 16$OC=1.81E-5 3$PC=1.430E-6 20
140LA cG M |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2} (1991Ch05); |a(K)exp=0.025 {I4}
140LA2cG (1982Ad02) K:L=0.32 {I4}:|?0.044 (1982Ad02)
140LA cG RI absolute I|g=3.15% {I4} (1977De34)
140LA G 437.575 2 7.91 4M1 0.0200 C
140LA3 G FL=29.9677
140LA cG %I|g=1.93 {I2}
140LAS G KC=0.01717 24$LC=0.00224 4$MC=0.000464 7
140LAS G NC=0.0001020 15$OC=1.664E-5 24$PC=1.317E-6 19
140LA cG M |a(K)exp=0.015 {I1} (1991Ch05)
140LA cG RI absolute I|g=1.93% {I4} (1977De34)
140LA G 467.5 0.002 LE ?
140LA cG %I|g=0.0002 {I2}
140LA cG E$transition is not observed neither in 1982Ad02, nor in 1990Me03;
140LA2cG E|g from E(level) difference
140LA L 581.073 90-
140LA B 24.7 3 7.07 3
140LAS B EAV=140.7 28
140LA cB E$480 {I30} (1965Bu07), 480 (1959Bo61)
140LA G 113.51 3 0.066 5M1 0.754
140LA cG %I|g=0.0161 {I12}
140LAS G KC=0.644 9$LC=0.0871 13$MC=0.0181 3
140LAS G NC=0.00398 6$OC=0.000647 9$PC=5.02E-5 7
140LA cG M |a(K)exp=0.62 {I25}
140LA G 418.44 40.015 1
140LA cG %I|g=0.0037 {I3}
140LA G 537.261 9 100.0 3M1 0.01196
140LA2 G FL=43.8132
140LA cG E from 1982Ad02. Other: 537.261 {I33} (1979Bo26)
140LA3 G %IG=24.39 22
140LAS G KC=0.01028 15$LC=0.001332 19$MC=0.000276 4
140LAS G NC=6.06E-5 9$OC=9.90E-6 14$PC=7.86E-7 11
140LA cG RI,M absolute I|g=24.39% {I22} (1977De34). Others: 23.4% {I10}
140LA2cG (1982Ad02); 25.7% {I6} (1975Ha50); |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I4};
140LA3cG K/L/M+N=1.04 {I4}/0.13 {I1}/0.06 {I1} (1991Ch05); |a(K)exp=0.0129
140LA3cG {I7}; K/L=6.8 {I7} (1982Ad02). Others: |a(K)exp=0.006 {I2},
140LAxcG K/L+=5.2 {I5} (1955Ro17); K/L+M=4 (1951Co39)
140LA G 551.08 40.0128 8
140LA cG %I|g=0.0031 {I2}