139CE 139PR EC DECAY (4.41 H) 1981ARZW,1976ZA03,1975VY0216NDS 201610
139CE H TYP=FUL$AUT=P.K. JOSHI, B. SINGH, S. SINGH, A.K. JAIN$
139CE2 H CIT=NDS 138, 1 (2016)$CUT=15-Oct-2016$
139CE c 1975Vy02 measured |g's, x rays, and |g|g-coincidences, |b's and ce's,
139CE2c and ce|g(t) (mag spect, Ge(Li)).
139CE c 1976Za03 measured |g's.
139CE c 1981ArZW measured |g's and x rays and |b's.
139CE c Others: 1976KaYX, 1968De02, 1969Be65, 1963Bi20
139CE c Level scheme is basically from 1976Za03; level at 1578 suggested by
139CE2c 1975Vy02 confirmed by 1981ArZW.
139CE cE $I|g(K| x ray)=2.17|*10{+5} {I22} (1981ArZW) compared to 1.71|*10{+5}
139CE2cE {I6} from the decay scheme relative to I|g(1347|g)=1000
139CE cE $|e/|b{++}=10.2 {I11} (1981ArZW) compared to 11.08 {I2} from decay
139CE2cE scheme.
139CE cE $|b/ce(K)(255|g)=1830 {I60} (1975Vy02) compared to 460 {I28} from
139CE2cE decay scheme. It is not clear from the text of 1975Vy02 whether the
139CE3cE I|b{++} includes contributions from {+139}Nd decay.
139CE cG $Except as noted all, E|g and I|g are from 1976Za03 and ce and
139CE2cG coincidence data are from 1975Vy02. |a(K)exp, normalized by
139CE3cG 1975Vy02 to |a(K)(255|g,M1)=0.0767, renormalized by evaluators to
139CE4cG |a(K)(255|g,M1+(68% {I14})E2)=0.0685 {I23}.
139CE cG M,MR$From |a(K)exp and conversion electron ratios, except as noted.
139CE2cG |d's deduced by evaluators.
139CE cG E(D)$Not observed by 1975Vy02.
139CE cG E(A),RI(B)$From 1981ArZW. The 2090|g expected from a level near
139CE2cG this energy in (d,t) was looked for but not observed by 1981ArZW.
139CE cG E(C)$Not observed by 1976Za03. However, it is not clear from the
139CE2cG discussion in 1976Za03 whether they have included all unplaced |g's
139CE3cG in their table.
139CE cL J$From Adopted Levels.
139PR P 0.0 5/2+ 4.41 H 4 2129.1 30
139PR cP J,T$From {+139}Pr Adopted Levels
139PR cP QP$ From 2012Wa38
139CE N 0.00473 11 1 1
139CE cN NR$from |SI|g(1+|a)(to g.s.), I(|g{+|+})=3.50|*10{+3} {I8}
139CE2cN (1976Za03. Other: 3.24|*10{+4} {I16} (1981ArZW)) relative to
139CE3cN I|g(1347|g)=100, and theoretical |e/|b{++} for the feeding to
139CE4cN the ground state
139CE PN 3
139CE G 1091.4 7 0.3 LE
139CEF G FLAG=ABC
139CE G 1517.2 4 0.4 LE
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE G 1678.5 3 0.3 LE
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE L 0.0 3/2+
139CE2 L %EC+%B+=100
139CE E 2129 3 8.28 10 90.47 11 5.631 5 98.75 4
139CES E EAV=500.8 14$CK=0.7766 6$CL=0.10884 9$CM+=0.03071 3
139CE cE E$from E|b=1107 {I3} (1981ArZW). Other: E|b=1090 {I10} (1975Vy02).
139CE cE TI$100-summed |e+|b{++} feeding to excited states. See also
139CE2cE normalization comment for gamma-ray intensities
139CE L 255.078 16 1/2+ 110 PS 20
139CE cL T$from 1975Vy02.
139CE G 255.11 2 49.8 14 M1+E2 1.5 5 0.084018 C
139CE cG $K:L:M+=1000:191 {I20}:50 {I6}. K:L1:L2:L3=6.8 {I20}:1.00:|<0.15:|<0.15
139CE2cG (1976KaYX)
139CES G KC=0.0680 24$LC=0.0126 7$MC=0.00270 17$
139CES G NC=0.00059 4$OC=9.0E-5 5$PC=4.7E-6 4
139CE L 754.24 8 11/2- 57.58 S 32 M
139CE2 L %IT=100
139CE cL T$from the Adopted Levels.
139CE cL $Isomer production ratio=0.008 {I2} (2000BeZV) discrepant with
139CE2cL I(|g+ce)(725|g)=0.015 {I3} (Evaluators)
139CE G 754.24 8 3.0 5 M4 0.0800
139CE2 G EKC=0.056 12
139CES G KC=0.0652 10$LC=0.01161 17$MC=0.00251 4$
139CES G NC=0.000557 8$OC=8.86E-5 13$PC=5.96E-6 9
139CE L 1320.249 20 5/2+
139CE E 0.062 4 7.93 3
139CES E CK=0.8403$CL=0.12432 4$CM+=0.03535 2
139CE G 1065.32 20 0.52 26
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG RI$7 {I4} (1976Za03).
139CE G 1320.24 2 14.7 2 M1,E2
139CE2 G EKC=0.0014 5
139CES G CC=0.00136 21$KC=0.00115 18$LC=0.000147 21$MC=3.1E-5 5$
139CES G NC=6.8E-6 10$OC=1.10E-6 17$PC=8.5E-8 14$IPC=2.54E-5 4
139CE L 1347.337 10 7/2+
139CE E 0.473 11 7.02 1
139CES E CK=0.8399$CL=0.12464 4$CM+=0.03546 2
139CE G 1347.33 1 100.0 E2
139CE2 G EKC=0.00076 10
139CES G CC=0.001123 16$KC=0.000938 14$LC=0.0001214 17$MC=2.53E-5 4$
139CES G NC=5.60E-6 8$OC=9.06E-7 13$PC=6.82E-8 10$IPC=3.15E-5 5
139CE L 1578.24 22 7/2-
139CE E 0.0132 24 8.3 1 ?
139CES E CK=0.8344 1$CL=0.12877 8$CM+=0.03684 3
139CE G 824.0 2 2.8 5 E2 ?
139CEF G FLAG=ABC
139CE2 G EKC=0.0020 8
139CES G CC=0.00310 5$KC=0.00263 4$LC=0.000365 6$MC=7.65E-5 11$
139CES G NC=1.689E-5 24$OC=2.70E-6 4$PC=1.90E-7 3
139CE L 1596.590 20 (3/2)+
139CE E 0.039 4 7.75 5
139CES E CK=0.8337 2$CL=0.12927 9$CM+=0.03700 3
139CE G 1341.50 9 1.0 5
139CE G 1596.58 2 7.2 6 M1,E2
139CE2 G EKC=0.0076 26
139CES G CC=0.00101 12$KC=0.00077 10$LC=9.8E-5 12$MC=2.03E-5 25$
139CES G NC=4.5E-6 6$OC=7.3E-7 9$PC=5.7E-8 8$IPC=0.0001147 24
139CE L 1630.674 18 3/2+
139CE E 0.485 17 6.59 1
139CES E CK=0.8324 2$CL=0.1303 1$CM+=0.03735 4
139CE G 1375.56 3 32.5 15M1(+E2) 1.2 LT C
139CE2 G EKC=0.00121 17
139CES G CC=0.00134 11$KC=0.00112 10$LC=0.000142 11$MC=2.96E-5 23$
139CES G NC=6.6E-6 6$OC=1.07E-6 9$PC=8.3E-8 8$IPC=3.90E-5 6
139CE G 1630.67 2 72.5 20 E2
139CE2 G EKC=0.00055 11
139CES G CC=0.000881 13$KC=0.000650 9$LC=8.27E-5 12$MC=1.719E-5 24$
139CES G NC=3.81E-6 6$OC=6.18E-7 9$PC=4.73E-8 7$IPC=0.0001265 18
139CE L 1818.436 22 3/2+,5/2+
139CE E 0.072 4 6.97 3
139CES E CK=0.8185 4$CL=0.1407 3$CM+=0.04084 10
139CE G 1563.38 2 8.8 5 E2 C
139CE2 G EKC=0.00045 19
139CES G CC=0.000917 13$KC=0.000704 10$LC=8.99E-5 13$MC=1.87E-5 3$
139CES G NC=4.14E-6 6$OC=6.71E-7 10$PC=5.12E-8 8$IPC=0.0001002 14
139CE G 1818.30 4 6.5 4
139CE cG E$slightly poor fit, level-energy difference=1818.42
139CE L 1842.9 10 (7/2-)
139CE E 0.0031 11 8.3 2 ?
139CES E CK=0.8151 5$CL=0.1432 4$CM+=0.04170 13
139CE G 1088.70 10 0.66 23 ?
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG $I|g=22 {I5} (1976Za03) would lead to a possible intensity imbalance
139CE2cG at the 754 level (-24 {I10}) suggesting that either I|g from 1976Za03
139CE3cG is incorrect or 1089|g is misassigned.
139CE L 1907.661 23 (3/2)+
139CE E 0.063 5 6.69 4
139CES E CK=0.8015 9$CL=0.1533 7$CM+=0.04512 22
139CE G 587.37 15 1.5 5 ?
139CE cG E$this |g ray is not confirmed in (p,n|g), treated as uncertain
139CE2cG by the evaluators
139CE G 1652.58 2 8.2 5 C
139CE G 1907.61 5 3.6 4
139CE L 1965.36 24 (3/2,5/2+)
139CE E 0.0021 6 7.8 1
139CES E CK=0.7772 20$CL=0.1715 15$CM+=0.0513 5
139CE G 1710.27 24 0.36 9
139CE G 1965.66 44 0.15 LE ?
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG RI$1.2 {I5} (1976Za03).
139CE L 1984.84 7 (3/2,5/2+)
139CE E 0.023 3 6.66 7
139CES E CK=0.763 3$CL=0.1822 21$CM+=0.0550 7
139CE G 354.00 10 2.5 5
139CEF G FLAG=D
139CE G 664.60 15 0.6 LE ?
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG RI$8 {I2} (1976Za03).
139CE G 1729.89 9 1.9 3 C
139CE G 1985.04 29 0.15 LE ?
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG RI$1.6 {I5} (1976Za03).
139CE L 2016.27 4 (3/2+)
139CE E 0.0132 16 6.62 7
139CES E CK=0.723 6$CL=0.212 5$CM+=0.0653 15
139CE G 696.01 10 0.6 LE ?
139CEF G FLAG=BD
139CE cG E$this |g ray is not confirmed in (p,n|g)
139CE cG RI$9 {I5} (1976Za03).
139CE G 2016.25 4 2.5 3
139CE L 2090.0 10 (3/2+,5/2+)
139CE E 0.00047LT 6.5 GT ?
139CES E CL=0.727 6$CM+=0.273 9
139CE G 2090 0.10 LT ?
139CEF G FLAG=AB