135PR 135ND EC DECAY (12.4 M) 1975WI11 08NDS 200803 135PR H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH, ALEXANDER A. RODIONOV and YURI L. KHAZOV$ 135PR2 H CIT=NDS 109, 517 (2008)$CUT=22-Jan-2008$ 135PR C 1975WI11: measured EG, IG, GG, CE 135PR C Others: 1968BRZX, 1970AB07, 1972AR02 135PR C Total decay energy of 4576 KEV 195 calculated (by ^RADLIST code) 135PR2C from level scheme agrees with the expected value of 4722 KEV 23 135PR CE From G-ray intensity balance, the levels at 731 and 952 135PR2CE have apparent but improbable EC+B+ feedings of 1.0% 4 and 2.2% 7, 135PR3CE respectively. Almost no feedings are expected from LOGFT 135PR4CE limits for JPI's involved. 135PR CG M$From EKC and K/L 135PR CG MR$Estimated (by evaluators) from EKC and/or K/L 135PR CL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g's 135PR CL J$From 'adopted levels' 135ND P 0.0 9/2(-) 12.4 M 6 4722 23 135PR N 0.496 16 1.0 1.0 135PR CN NR$from TI(206.0G+245.4G+493.4G+ G's to 41.5 level)=100. 135PR2CN Direct EC,B+ feeding to 41.5 level is assumed as <6% corresponding 135PR3CN to LOGF1UT>8.5. No direct EC, B+ feeding to GS is expected 135PR PN 3 135PR G 322.6 10 1.2 4 E1(+M2) 0.3 LT 0.019 9 135PRS G KC=0.016 7$LC=0.0023 12$MC=0.00050 25$NC+=0.00013 7 135PRS G NC=0.00011 6$OC=1.8E-5 9$PC=1.2E-6 7 135PR CG EKC=0.015 8 135PR G 708.4 5 1.6 3 M2,E3 0.016 5 135PRS G KC=0.013 4$LC=0.0020 4$MC=0.00043 8$NC+=0.000113 21 135PRS G NC=9.7E-5 18$OC=1.5E-5 3$PC=1.0E-6 4 135PR CG EKC=0.012 6 135PR L 0.0 3/2(+) 135PR L 41.47 5 5/2(+) 135PR E 4 LT 2 LT 8.5 GT 6 LT 1U? 135PRS E EAV=1655 11$CK=0.347 5$CL=0.0490 6$CM+=0.01391 17 135PR CE TI$from LOGF1UT>8.5. Intensity balance gives 6 +-30 135PR G 41.48 5 45 10M1(+E2) 0.15 LT 3.1 6 C 135PRS G LC=2.5 5$MC=0.53 11$NC+=0.14 3 135PRS G NC=0.116 24$OC=0.018 4$PC=0.001085 18 135PR CG ELC=2.0 10 135PR L 206.17 7 7/2(+) 135PR E 4.9 5 1.6 2 6.76 6 6.5 7 135PRS E EAV=1589 11$CK=0.205 3$CL=0.0285 5$CM+=0.00807 13 135PR G 164.70 5 8.0 6 M1+E2 +0.45 20 0.326 8 C 135PRS G KC=0.269 4$LC=0.045 6$MC=0.0096 14$NC+=0.0025 4 135PRS G NC=0.0021 3$OC=0.00033 4$PC=1.98E-5 8 135PR CG M,MR$EKC=0.35 6 gives M1,E2; MR: 0.94 13 from K/L=4.6 17, +0.45 20 135PR2CG from G(THETA) in (P,2NG) 135PR G 206.0 3 6.0 5 E2 0.172 C 135PRS G KC=0.1296 20$LC=0.0332 5$MC=0.00730 11$NC+=0.00184 3 135PRS G NC=0.001594 25$OC=0.000233 4$PC=7.90E-6 12 135PR CG M$EKC=0.16 5 gives M1,E2; adopted DJ forbids L=1 135PR L 245.53 7 7/2(+) 135PR E 9 4 3.0 12 6.47 19 12 5 135PRS E EAV=1570 11$CK=0.210 4$CL=0.0293 5$CM+=0.00828 13 135PR G 204.09 5 100 M1 0.1762 C 135PRS G KC=0.1503 21$LC=0.0205 3$MC=0.00431 6$NC+=0.001130 16 135PRS G NC=0.000964 14$OC=0.0001553 22$PC=1.149E-5 17 135PR CG EKC=0.18 2, K/L=8.7 12 135PR G 245.4 2 6.8 5 (E2) 0.0963 C 135PRS G KC=0.0748 11$LC=0.01686 25$MC=0.00369 6$NC+=0.000932 14 135PRS G NC=0.000807 12$OC=0.0001198 18$PC=4.71E-6 7 135PR CG M$EKC=0.065 13 gives M1+E2 with MR<0.5; K/L=7.2 38 gives MR>2. 135PR2CG Adopted DJ forbids L=1 135PR L 358.15 8 (11/2-) 105 US 10 M 135PR2 L %IT=100 135PR CL T$ from 'adopted levels' 135PR E 14 4 5.1 13 6.22 12 19 5 135PRS E EAV=1518 11$CK=0.226 4$CL=0.0315 5$CM+=0.00891 14 135PR G 112.62 5 9.0 10M2 8.26 C 135PRS G KC=6.46 10$LC=1.408 20$MC=0.312 5$NC+=0.0817 12 135PRS G NC=0.0699 10$OC=0.01101 16$PC=0.000707 10 135PR CG EKC=6.7 15, K/L=4.1 11. MR(E3/M2)<0.2 135PR G 316.7 3 2.2 4 E3 0.1601 135PRS G KC=0.1081 16$LC=0.0405 6$MC=0.00914 14$NC+=0.00229 4 135PRS G NC=0.00200 3$OC=0.000288 5$PC=7.31E-6 11 135PR CG EKC=0.070 13, K/L=2.1 7. EKC is lower by AP 30% than KC(E3) 135PR L 493.37 17 7/2(+) 135PR E 4.3 3 1.7 1 6.65 4 6.0 4 135PRS E EAV=1455 11$CK=0.247 4$CL=0.0344 6$CM+=0.00974 15 135PR G 247.5 10 0.4 2 C 135PR G 451.9 2 8.5 5 M1+E2 +0.4 1 0.0208 6 C 135PRS G KC=0.0178 5$LC=0.00241 5$MC=0.000508 9$NC+=0.0001331 24 135PRS G NC=0.0001136 20$OC=1.82E-5 4$PC=1.33E-6 4 135PR CG M$EKC=0.014 3 gives M1,E2; MR from (P,2NG) 135PR G 493.4 3 2.9 3 E2 0.01169 135PRS G KC=0.00971 14$LC=0.001561 22$MC=0.000333 5$NC+=8.60E-5 13 135PRS G NC=7.38E-5 11$OC=1.147E-5 17$PC=6.74E-7 10 135PR CG EKC=0.0093 31 135PR CG M$EKC=0.0093 31 gives MR(E2/M1)>1; but adopted DJ forbids L=1 135PR L 517.35 15 9/2(+) 135PR E 6.3 7 2.7 3 6.46 6 9.0 10 135PRS E EAV=1444 11$CK=0.251 4$CL=0.0350 6$CM+=0.00990 16 135PR G 271.9 2 4.9 6 M1+E2 +0.25 5 0.0807 C 135PRS G KC=0.0686 11$LC=0.00951 15$MC=0.00201 4$NC+=0.000525 8 135PRS G NC=0.000448 7$OC=7.19E-5 11$PC=5.19E-6 9 135PR CG EKC=0.100 15, K/L=6.9 29. EKC is higher by AP 20% 135PR2CG than KC(M1). MR: <0.8 (from K/L=6.9 29), +0.25 5 from (P,2NG) 135PR G 475.8 2 16.5 10E2 0.01291 C 135PRS G KC=0.01070 15$LC=0.001742 25$MC=0.000373 6$NC+=9.60E-5 14 135PRS G NC=8.25E-5 12$OC=1.278E-5 18$PC=7.41E-7 11 135PR CG EKC=0.0090 20 gives MR(E2/M1)>4 135PR L 543.20 11 7/2(-) 135PR E 4.4 7 1.9 3 6.61 8 6.3 10 135PRS E EAV=1432 11$CK=0.256 4$CL=0.0356 6$CM+=0.01007 16 135PR G 185.07 8 5.5 6 (E2) 0.247 C 135PRS G KC=0.182 3$LC=0.0509 8$MC=0.01124 16$NC+=0.00282 4 135PRS G NC=0.00245 4$OC=0.000356 5$PC=1.084E-5 16 135PR CG M$EKC=0.20 4 gives M1,E2; K/L=2.7 6 is slightly lower than 135PR2CG K/L(E2)(theory) 135PR G 501.6 2 19.4 12E1 0.00373 C 135PRS G KC=0.00321 5$LC=0.000414 6$MC=8.66E-5 13$NC+=2.26E-5 4 135PRS G NC=1.93E-5 3$OC=3.09E-6 5$PC=2.22E-7 4 135PR CG EKC=0.0023 8 135PR L 688.6 4 (9/2+) 135PR E 1.8 5 0.90 23 6.90 12 2.7 7 135PRS E EAV=1364 11$CK=0.281 5$CL=0.0392 6$CM+=0.01110 18 135PR G 442.7 7 2.0 10 C 135PR G 482.6 4 3.4 7 M1(+E2) 1.5 LT 0.0164 21 C 135PRS G KC=0.0139 20$LC=0.00195 15$MC=0.00041 3$NC+=0.000107 9 135PRS G NC=9.2E-5 7$OC=1.46E-5 13$PC=1.03E-6 17 135PR CG EKC=0.022 10 135PR L 730.95 21(15/2-) 135PR CL Apparent EC, B+ feeding deduced from an intensity 135PR2CL balance of 1.0% 4 must be due to unobserved GAMMA transitions 135PR3CL feeding this level, since no BETA feeding is expected for |DJ=(3), 135PR4CL |D|p=(no) 135PR G 372.8 2 4.5 4 E2 0.0260 C 135PRS G KC=0.0212 3$LC=0.00380 6$MC=0.000818 12$NC+=0.000209 3 135PRS G NC=0.000180 3$OC=2.76E-5 4$PC=1.426E-6 20 135PR CG M$EKC=0.020 5 gives MR(E2/M1)>1.2; G(THETA) in (A,8NG) 135PR2CG (1975WI11) gives DJ=2 135PR L 777.4 3 (11/2+) 135PR E 1.8 5 0.95 25 6.86 12 2.7 7 135PRS E EAV=1323 11$CK=0.298 5$CL=0.0416 7$CM+=0.01177 19 135PR G 259.8 3 1.5 5 ? ? 135PR CG This G may be contributed by an impurity, since expected 135PR2CG RI=0.3 1 (from adopted gammas); and EKC<0.01 gives E1 but DJPI 135PR3CG requires M1,E2 135PR G 531.9 3 3.9 10(E2) 0.00955 C 135PRS G KC=0.00796 12$LC=0.001249 18$MC=0.000266 4$NC+=6.88E-5 10 135PRS G NC=5.90E-5 9$OC=9.21E-6 13$PC=5.57E-7 8 135PR CG M$EKC=0.0073 34 gives MR(E2/M1)>0.8, but DJPI requires E2 135PR L 799.25 16 9/2(-) 135PR E 7.3 10 4.1 5 6.22 7 11.4 15 135PRS E EAV=1313 11$CK=0.303 5$CL=0.0422 7$CM+=0.01195 19 135PR G 256.1 2 5.3 6 M1(+E2) 0.35 LT 0.0949 15 C 135PRS G KC=0.0807 15$LC=0.01121 25$MC=0.00237 6$NC+=0.000619 14 135PRS G NC=0.000528 12$OC=8.47E-5 16$PC=6.10E-6 15 135PR CG EKC=0.097 16 135PR G 441.1 2 28.8 20 M1,E2 0.020 4 C 135PRS G KC=0.016 4$LC=0.00242 22$MC=0.00051 5$NC+=0.000133 12 135PRS G NC=0.000114 10$OC=1.80E-5 20$PC=1.2E-6 3 135PR CG EKC=0.017 3 135PR L 951.78 25(13/2-) 135PR CL Apparent EC, B+ feeding deduced from an intensity 135PR2CL balance of 2.0% 7 must be due to unobserved GAMMA transitions 135PR3CL feeding this level, since BETA feeding is expected as <0.003% 135PR4CL for |DJ=(2), |D|p=(no) 135PR G 221.0 5 1.4 5 M1,E2 0.139 4 C 135PRS G KC=0.112 9$LC=0.021 5$MC=0.0045 11$NC+=0.00115 25 135PRS G NC=0.00099 22$OC=0.00015 3$PC=7.8E-6 15 135PR CG EKC=0.09 4 135PR G 593.7 4 7.6 10M1+E2 -1.5 10 0.0084 19 C 135PRS G KC=0.0071 17$LC=0.00101 17$MC=0.00021 4$NC+=5.6E-5 9 135PRS G NC=4.8E-5 8$OC=7.6E-6 14$PC=5.1E-7 14 135PR CG M$EKC=0.0110 25 gives M1+E2, MR<0.65. From (P,2NG), MR=-1.5 10 135PR L 984.4 4 (9/2+) 135PR E 0.83 24 0.57 16 7.03 13 1.4 4 135PRS E EAV=1228 11$CK=0.343 6$CL=0.0478 8$CM+=0.01353 21 135PR G 739.4 5 1.6 3 M1+E2 -2.0 15 0.0046 14 C 135PRS G KC=0.0039 12$LC=0.00055 13$MC=0.00012 3$NC+=3.0E-5 7 135PRS G NC=2.6E-5 6$OC=4.1E-6 11$PC=2.8E-7 10 135PR CG M,MR$from (P,2NG) 135PR G 777.7 5 1.2 6 C 135PR L 1159.7 4 (9/2-) ? 135PR E 1.0 2 0.86 18 6.81 10 1.9 4 135PRS E EAV=1147 11$CK=0.384 6$CL=0.0537 9$CM+=0.01520 24 135PR G 616.5 3 3.8 6 C 135PR L 1185.16 23 (9/2-,11/2-) 135PR E 1.6 2 1.3 1 6.61 6 2.9 3 135PRS E EAV=1135 11$CK=0.391 6$CL=0.0546 9$CM+=0.01546 24 135PR G 233.4 3 2.5 3 M1,E2 0.118 5 C 135PRS G KC=0.096 9$LC=0.017 4$MC=0.0037 8$NC+=0.00096 18 135PRS G NC=0.00082 16$OC=0.000126 19$PC=6.7E-6 13 135PR CG EKC=0.10 2 135PR G 385.9 2 2.9 4 (E2) 0.0235 C 135PRS G KC=0.0192 3$LC=0.00339 5$MC=0.000729 11$NC+=0.000187 3 135PRS G NC=0.0001608 23$OC=2.46E-5 4$PC=1.297E-6 19 135PR CG M$EKC=0.013 6 gives E1 or E2 135PR L 1214.2 3 (7/2-,9/2-,11/2-) 135PR E 0.85 16 0.75 14 6.86 9 1.6 3 135PRS E EAV=1122 11$CK=0.398 6$CL=0.0556 9$CM+=0.01576 24 135PR G 415.0 3 2.2 3 M1,E2 0.023 4 C 135PRS G KC=0.019 4$LC=0.00288 21$MC=0.00061 4$NC+=0.000159 12 135PRS G NC=0.000136 10$OC=2.14E-5 20$PC=1.4E-6 4 135PR CG EKC=0.022 8 135PR G 670.6 7 1.0 4 C 135PR G 1172.1 7 2.2 7 ? 135PR L 1289.5 3 (11/2-) 135PR E 0.81 20 0.79 20 6.82 12 1.6 4 135PRS E EAV=1088 11$CK=0.418 7$CL=0.0585 9$CM+=0.01655 25 135PR G 490.3 3 1.7 3 M1+E2 -1.5 10 0.014 3 C 135PRS G KC=0.012 3$LC=0.00172 21$MC=0.00037 4$NC+=9.5E-5 12 135PRS G NC=8.1E-5 10$OC=1.28E-5 18$PC=8.3E-7 23 135PR CG M$EKC=0.014 5 gives M1,E2; MR from (P,2NG) 135PR G 746.1 5 1.5 5 ? 135PR L 1303.2 4 (11/2-) 135PR E 0.75 15 0.75 15 6.84 9 1.5 3 135PRS E EAV=1081 11$CK=0.422 7$CL=0.0590 9$CM+=0.0167 3 135PR G 351.6 5 2.0 4 135PR G 572.0 5 1.1 4 C 135PR L 1765.9 8 (7/2-,9/2-,11/2-) ? 135PR E 0.9 3 1.7 5 6.35 14 2.6 8 135PRS E EAV=871 11$CK=0.558 8$CL=0.0782 11$CM+=0.0222 3 135PR G 966.6 7 5.2 15 C 135PR L 1998.0 7 (7/2,9/2,11/2+) 135PR E 0.8 3 2.3 9 6.15 17 3.1 12 135PRS E EAV=766 11$CK=0.629 7$CL=0.0884 10$CM+=0.0250 3 135PR G 1480.7 7 2.3 7 C 135PR G 1752.0 15 4.0 20 C 135PR L 2129.2 7 (7/2,9/2,11/2-) ? 135PR E 0.16 5 0.59 20 6.69 15 0.75 25 135PRS E EAV=707 11$CK=0.668 7$CL=0.0940 10$CM+=0.0266 3 135PR G 1586.0 7 1.5 5 C