132SB 132SN B- DECAY (39.7 S) 1989ST06,1995MA02 ENSDF 201803
132SB H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=28-FEB-2018$
132SB H TYP=FUL$AUT=YU. KHAZOV, A.A. RODIONOV AND S. SAKHAROV, BALRAJ SINGH$
132SB2 H CIT=NDS 104, 497 (2005)$CUT=10-Feb-2005$
132SB c 1989St06: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g|g(t)
132SB c 1995Ma02 (also 1995Ma49): measured ce, |g|g(|q) for nine cascades,
132SB2c level lifetimes by |b|g(t) and |b|g|g(t)
132SB c 1972Ke20 (also 1973Ke23): measured T{-1/2}, E|g, I|g, |g|g, ce, |b,
132SBxc |b|g(t)
132SB c Others:
132SB c 1979Bo26: measured energies of three |g rays with a
132SB2c curved-crystal spectrometer
132SB c T{-1/2}({+132}Sn isotope): 1975Ba36, 1974Gr29, 1972Nu04, 1972Na10,
132SB2c 1972Iz01 (also 1978Iz03), 1970Li14, 1966St25, 1963Gr13
132SB c |b spectra: 1977Al09
132SB c 1972ClZN, 1974ClZX: measured (fragment)(fragment)(|g)(t), |g|g(t)
132SB2c to deduce isomers from {+242}Cf SF decay. The authors observed
132SB3c 91|g and 163|g in coin forming a cascade from a 102-ns isomer.
132SB c Theoretical calculations of T{-1/2} and log| {Ift} for {+132}Sn decay:
132SB2c 2015Su10, 2013Mi02
132SB cG $|g|g(|q) were measured by 1995Ma02 for the following cascades,
132SB2cG but the values of A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients were not quoted:
132SB3cG 340-86; 549-529; 993-86; 247-549; 247-652; 247-993; 247-1078;
132SB4cG 899-340; 1240-86. Results were interpreted for J|p and |d values
132SB5cG assuming J|p({+132}Sb g.s.)=4+ and 3+
132SB cG E,RI$From 1989St06
132SB cG E(A)$ Tentative |g in coincidence with gate on 246.87|g (1989St06)
132SB cG M$From ce data (1995Ma02,1972Ke20). In 1995Ma02, |g and ce spectra
132SB2cG were measured simultaneously. In 1972Ke20, ce data were normalized
132SB3cG to 527, M4 transition in {+135}Xe. The assignments given in
132SB4cG parentheses are based on significant |d(Q/D) ratios which from RUL
132SB5cG are most likely M1+E2 rather than E1+M2
132SB cG MR$From |g|g(|q) (1995Ma02), based on J|p=4+ for {+132}Sb g.s.
132SB cG M(B)$From intensity balance (1989St06) in 94-135-92-163 cascade.
132SB2cG The ordering of the 94-135 may be reversed without affecting
132SB3cG the multipolarity assignment
132SB cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data
132SB cL J$From Adopted Levels. The assignments are essentially suggested by
132SB2cL 1989St06 on the basis of 1+ for 1325 and 2268 levels (from
132SB3cL log| {Ift} values); (4)+ for {+132}Sb g.s.; multipolarity
132SB3cL of transitions; and |g|g(|q) data from 1995Ma02.
132SB4cL Other J|p choices are possible if J|p({+132}Sb g.s.)=3+.
132SB5cL Comparison with shell-model calculations is also used in
132SB6cL assigning J|p values.
132SB cL T$From |b|g(t) (1995Ma02), unless otherwise indicated
132SB cL J(A)$Preferred choice (1989St06). Less likely choice is given
132SB2cL under comments
132SB cL E(H)$Possible member of configuration=|pg{-7/2}~#|nh{-11/2}{+-1}
132SB cL E(D)$Possible member of configuration=|pg{-7/2}~#|nd{-3/2}{+-1}
132SB cL E(T)$Possible member of configuration=|pd{-5/2}~#|nd{-3/2}{+-1}
132SN P 0.0 0+ 39.7 S 8 3089 3
132SN cP T$From {+132}Sn Adopted Levels
132SN cP QP$From 2017Wa10
132SB N 0.490 12 1 1
132SB cN NR$From I(|g+ce)(|g rays to g.s.)=100
132SB PN 3
132SB G 710 A
132SB G 816 A
132SB G 870 A
132SB L 0.0 (4)+ 2.79 M 7 D
132SB cL J$3+ is not completely ruled out as discussed by 1995Ma02
132SB L 0+X (8-) 4.10 M 5 H ?
132SB cL E$x=150-250 keV (1989St06). Other: 200 {I30} (2017Au03)
132SB cL $Possible feeding from 254 level
132SB L 85.55 6 (3)+ 15.62 NS 13 D
132SB cL J$2 if J({+132}Sb g.s.)=3
132SB cL T$other: 14.8 ns {I18} (1972Ke20)
132SB G 85.58 8 98.0 20M1+E2 -0.095 14 0.981 15 C
132SBF G FL=0.0
132SBS G KC=0.841 13$LC=0.1130 25$MC=0.0225 5
132SBS G NC=0.00431 10$OC=0.000418 8
132SB cG E$85.428 {I4} (1979Bo26)
132SB cG $ |a(K)exp=0.83 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.13 {I3} (1972Ke20)
132SB L 162.80 20 (5+) D
132SBF L FLAG=A
132SB G 162.8 2 0.15 7 (M1) 0.1591 BC
132SBF G FL=0.0
132SBS G KC=0.1374 20$LC=0.0175 3$MC=0.00346 5
132SBS G NC=0.000668 10$OC=6.60E-5 10
132SB L 254.5 3 (6-) 102 NS 4 H
132SBF L FLAG=A
132SB cL J$4- is possible but less likely
132SB cL T$ from study of isomers in fission products (1974ClZX).
132SB2cL Other: 150 ns {I70} (1989St06)
132SB cL $It is possible that this level also feeds the 4.10-min, (8-) isomer
132SB G 91.7 2 0.17 3 (E1) 0.241 BC
132SBS G KC=0.208 4$LC=0.0268 5$MC=0.00526 8
132SBS G NC=0.000995 16$OC=9.19E-5 14
132SB L 389.2 4 (4-) H ?
132SBF L FLAG=A
132SB cL E$ reverse ordering of 94-135 cascade is also possible giving a
132SB2cL level at 348.4, instead of that at 389.2
132SB cL J$3- is possible but less likely
132SB G 134.7 2 0.24 3 (E2) 0.574 BC
132SBS G KC=0.440 7$LC=0.1075 17$MC=0.0220 4
132SBS G NC=0.00405 7$OC=0.000319 5
132SB L 426.07 6 (2)+ 15.8 PS 17 D
132SB cL J$3 if J({+132}Sb g.s.)=3
132SB cL T$other: |<2 ns (1972Ke20)
132SB G 340.53 5 100 M1,E2 0.0236 11 C
132SBS G KC=0.0201 7$LC=0.0028 4$MC=0.00055 8
132SBS G NC=0.000106 13$OC=1.00E-5 8
132SB cG E$340.48 {I3} (1979Bo26)
132SB cG $-0.20|<|d|<0
132SB cG $ |a(K)exp=0.021 {I4} (1972Ke20), 0.018 {I2} (1995Ma02)
132SB G 426.1 1 LE ?
132SBF G FL=0.0
132SB cG E$from 1995Ma02 only
132SB L 483.1 4 (3-) H
132SBF L FLAG=A
132SB cL J$2- is possible but less likely
132SB B 0.19 LT 7.4 GT ?
132SBS B EAV=1061.3 19
132SB cB IB upper limit as 93.9|g is in coincidence with 246.87|g
132SB G 93.9 2 0.20 2 (M1) 0.740 BC
132SBS G KC=0.638 10$LC=0.0822 13$MC=0.01628 25
132SBS G NC=0.00314 5$OC=0.000309 5
132SB L 529.10 5 (3+) 13 PS LE
132SB cL J$2 if J({+132}Sb g.s.)=3
132SB cL $ Possible configuration=|pg{-7/2}~#|ns{-1/2}{+-1}
132SB G 443.5 2 0.46 4 C
132SB G 529.09 6 4.3 4 D(+Q) -0.23 23 C
132SBF G FL=0.0
132SB L 1078.31 6 (2)+ 2.6 PS 14 T
132SB cL J$1 if J({+132}Sb g.s.)=3
132SB cL T$other: |<2 ns (1972Ke20)
132SB G 549.23 7 4.7 4 D(+Q) -0.07 21 C
132SB G 652.31 6 5.5 4 (M1(+E2)) -0.7 6 0.0043 3 C
132SBS G KC=0.00372 23$LC=0.000463 19$MC=9.1E-5 4
132SBS G NC=1.76E-5 8$OC=1.74E-6 10
132SB G 992.66 8 75 4 M1+E2 -0.49 8 0.001653 C
132SBS G KC=0.00144 3$LC=0.000174 3$MC=3.43E-5 6
132SBS G NC=6.63E-6 12$OC=6.60E-7 12
132SB G 1078.3 1 5.1 3 C
132SBF G FL=0.0
132SB cG $|d(O/Q)=0
132SB L 1325.15 6 1+ 37 PS LE T
132SB cL T$other: |<0.8 ns (1972Ke20)
132SB B 99 4 4.02 2 C
132SBS B EAV=677.5 18
132SB cB E other: 1760 {I40} from 1977Al09
132SB G 246.87 5 86 4 M1+E2 -0.14 6 0.0523 9 C
132SBS G KC=0.0452 7$LC=0.00574 12$MC=0.001135 24
132SBS G NC=0.000219 5$OC=2.16E-5 4
132SB cG E$246.736 {I15} (1979Bo26)
132SB cG $ |a(K)exp=0.046 {I9} (1972Ke20), 0.050 {I5} (1995Ma02)
132SB G 795.7 2 0.63 4 C
132SB G 899.04 5 91 5 M1+E2 -0.22 10 0.002134 C
132SBS G KC=0.00186 4$LC=0.000224 4$MC=4.42E-5 7
132SBS G NC=8.54E-6 14$OC=8.52E-7 15
132SB G 1239.63 5 19.8 10 C
132SB cG $|d(O/Q)=0
132SB L 2268.26 19 1+ 60 PS LE
132SB cL $Possible configuration=|pg{-7/2}~#|nd{-5/2}{+-1}
132SB B 0.88 7 4.82 4
132SBS B EAV=275.9 16
132SB G 1739.10 25 0.29 6 C
132SB G 1842.22 25 1.5 1 C