132LA 132LA IT DECAY (24.3 M) 1972HA41 05NDS 200504
132LA H TYP=FUL$AUT=YU. KHAZOV, A.A. RODIONOV AND S. SAKHAROV, BALRAJ SINGH$
132LA2 H CIT=NDS 104, 497 (2005)$CUT=10-Feb-2005$
132LA c 1972Ha41: Measured ce, subshell ratios.
132LA c 1969Ge11: Measured half-life, E|g, I|g
132LA c The level scheme is from 1972Ha41 and 1969Ge11
132LA CG E$ From ce data of 1972Ha41; uncertainty is quoted as 0.15%.
132LA CG RI(A)$ Total intensity measurement of the 52 and 135 transitions
132LA2CG in a cascade differed by <7% (1972Ha41), thus uncertainty of
132LA3CG about 7% is assigned to the photon intensity
132LA CL J$ From adopted levels
132LA P 188.56 18 6- 24.3 M 5
132LA N 0.65 3 0.76
132LA CN NR$ |S(TI TO GS)=100
132LA CN BR$ From the total intensity of the 663|g in 132BA
132LA2CN populated by the EC+B+ decay of 24.3-min isomer of 132LA, 1972Ha41
132LA3CN estimate that 24% branch from this isomer proceeds to 132BA levels.
132LA PN 3
132LA L 0.0 2-
132LA L 135.77 17 3-
132LA G 135.8 2 100 7 M1+E2 0.21 3 0.470 A
132LAS G KC= 0.3967 13$LC= 0.0568 17$MC= 0.0118 4$NC+=0.00324 10
132LA cG M,MR$ from K:L1:L2:L3:M=100 {I15}:16 {I3}:1.4 {I3}:0.8 {I2}:4.5 {I7}
132LA L 188.56 18 6- 24.3 M 5 M
132LA CL T$ from adopted levels
132LA G 52.8 1 0.081 6 M3 1770 A
132LA cG RI$ from intensity balance at 135.8 level. Other: <0.2 (1969Ge11)
132LAS G KC= 573 $LC= 941 $MC= 230.2 $NC+= 71.6
132LA cG M$ from K:L1:L2:L3:M=<50:82 {I12}:12 {I2}:130 {I20}:60 {I9}
132LA G 188.5 3 0.6 AP E4 8.38
132LAS G KC= 2.63 $LC= 4.60 $MC= 1.074 $NC+= 0.292
132LA cG RI$ from I(|g+ce)(188.5)/I(|g+ce)(135.8)|?0.04 (1972Ha41).
132LA2cG Other: <1 (1969Ge11)
132LA cG M$ from K:L3:M=4.5 {I7}:3.0 {I5}:2.5 {I4}; L2 and L3 are partially
132LAxcG resolved