129SB 129SN B- DECAY (2.23 M) 1995ST28,1987STZO 14NDS 201408
129SB H TYP=FUL$AUT=JANOS TIMAR AND ZOLTAN ELEKES, BALRAJ SINGH$
129SB2 H CIT=NDS 121, 143 (2014)$CUT=31-May-2014$
129SB C 1995St28, 1987StZO (thesis by the first author of 1995St28):
129SB2C 235U(N,F) E=TH, on-line mass separator; Ge detector, CE, GG-coin, T.
129SB C 1982Hu09: 235U(N,F) E=TH, on-line mass separator;
129SB2C Ge detector, GG-coin, T. A total of 57 |g rays up to 1951 keV are
129SB3C reported in this study, but only 14 |g rays are common with those
129SB4C in 1987StZO and 1995St28. Only 17 |g rays were placed in a level scheme
129SB5C with 12 excited states. Following levels are not confirmed in
129SB6C 1987StZO: 1448.2, 1755.8, 2018.1, 2148.6 and 2463.8. Placements
129SB7C of several |g rays are different from those in 1987StZO and 1995St28
129SB c Others: prior to work of 1982Hu09, only one |g ray at 645 was known
129SB C 1980De35: 235U(N,F) E=TH, on-line mass separator;
129SB2C Ge detector, scin G, B, CE, GG-, BG-coin.
129SB C 1974Fo06: 235U(N,F) E=TH, chem; pc B, Ge detector
129SB C 1972Iz01: 235U(N,F) E=TH, on-line mass separator;
129SB2C Ge detector, GG-coin.
129SB c The decay scheme given here is from 1987StZO and 1995St28. Note that
129SB2c 1982Hu09 proposed a decay scheme with 12 levels, 7 of which are
129SB3c confirmed in 1987StZO
129SB cB IB$Deduced by evaluators from |g-ray intensity balance. Gamma-intensity
129SB2cB balance for 1161 level gives non-physical |b feeding of -0.56% {I7}
129SB TG $----------------------------------------------------------------
129SB TG $ Gamma rays reported in 1982Hu09 but not confirmed in 1987StZO
129SB TG $ EG RI Level EG RI Level
129SB TG $
129SB TG $ 66.4 3 5.0 10 455.2 5 0.4 2
129SB TG $ 80.5 1 6.6 9 541.0 3 0.8 3
129SB TG $ 82.2 2 2.3 5 567.4 4 0.6 2 2749.0?
129SB TG $139.8 1 2.3 2 569.6 2 1.1 3 2018.1?
129SB TG $182.2 1 0.7 1 598.2 2 1.1 3
129SB TG $190.2 2 0.5 1 600.6 2 1.5 3 2749.0?
129SB TG $192.6 2 0.5 1 618.6 2 1.5 4
129SB TG $198.1 1 2.2 2 803.0 2 2.1 6 1448.2
129SB TG $202.9 2 0.9 1 867.7 2 1.2 4
129SB TG $256.6 2 0.5 1 2018.1? 897.7 4 0.8 3
129SB TG $258.3 2 0.9 2 1110.7 2 4.0 10 1755.8
129SB TG $262.6 10 1406.6 3 1.2 4
129SB TG $273.7 2 0.4 1 2115.4 1410.7 3 1.1 4
129SB TG $284.8 3 0.5 1 2749.0? 1725.6 2 2.8 8
129SB TG $296.0 1 2.1 3 1755.9 3 1.5 5 1755.8
129SB TG $336.0 1 1.7 2 1779.1 3 2.5 8
129SB TG $368.3 2 0.5 1 1831.8 3 1.8 6
129SB TG $372.3 3 0.6 2 1865.0 3 1.3 5
129SB TG $374.1 4 0.4 2 1915.2 3 1.5 5
129SB TG $385.9 3 0.7 2 1942.6 3 2.1 7
129SB TG $416.9 2 1.0 3 2258.6 1951.0 4 1.2 5
129SB TG $445.5 2 1.0 2 2463.8?
129SB TG $----------------------------------------------------------------
129SB CG E,RI$From 1987StZO (thesis from first author of 1995St28). Detailed
129SB2CG |g-ray data are also available from 1982Hu09, but a large number of
129SB3CG |g rays in this work has not been confirmed by 1987StZO. Many of these
129SB4CG |g rays probably belong to impurities.
129SB cG E(A)$Double uncertainty assumed by evaluators for least-squares fit
129SB cG E(B),RI(B)$From figure III-30 in 1987StZO; uncertainties assumed by the
129SB2cG evaluators
129SB cL $Following levels proposed in 1982Hu09 are not confirmed in 1987StZO.
129SB2cL The gamma rays assigned in 1982Hu09 either have been placed elsewhere
129SB3cL or not seen in 1987StZO: 1448.2, 1755.8, 2018.1(?), 2148.6, 2463.8(?).
129SB4cL These are omitted here
129SB cL E$From least-squares fit to the E|g data with double the quoted
129SB2cL uncertainty for 645|g, 862|g and 1470|g to get an acceptable fit
129SB3cL with reduced |h{+2}=2.9. Otherwise reduced |h{+2}=6.9
129SB cL J,T$From Adopted Levels
129SN P 0.0 3/2+ 2.23 M 4 4022 29
129SN CP QP$From 2012Wa38
129SN CP J,T$From Adopted Levels of {+129}Sn
129SB N 0.880 13 1.0 1.0
129SB CN NR$From summed I(|g+ce) to GS=100. No B- feeding to GS is expected
129SB PN 4
129SB L 0.0 7/2+ 4.366 H 26
129SB L 644.96 7(5/2)+
129SB B 71 2 5.853 22
129SBS B EAV=1420 14
129SB G 645.19 5 100.0 16 A
129SB DG $EG=645.13 8, IG=100.0 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 913.61 5(3/2)+
129SB B 3.2 2 7.05 4
129SBS B EAV=1294 14
129SB G 913.54 5 6.3 2
129SB DG $EG=913.2 2, IG=5.0 10 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1161.41 5(9/2+)
129SB G 1161.42 5 0.90 6
129SB L 1252.24 5(3/2+,5/2,7/2-)
129SB cL J$1995St28 (also 1987StZO) suggest 5/2+
129SB B 0.24 12 8.0 2
129SBS B EAV=1136 14
129SB G 1252.21 5 4.58 9
129SB DG $EG=1252.0 1, IG=1.9 5 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1493.11 7(1/2+)
129SB B 2.7 2 6.75 4
129SBS B EAV=1024 14
129SB G 579.30 8 2.4 1
129SB G 848.27 6 2.44 5
129SB L 1503.59 7 (5/2+)
129SB cL J$1995St28 (also 1987StZO) suggest 7/2+
129SB B 1.2 1 7.09 5
129SBS B EAV=1020 14
129SB G 251.7 4 0.59 2
129SB G 342.2 2 0.92 2
129SB G 858.2 2 1.70 3
129SB DG $EG=858.2 2, IG=1.7 5 (1982Hu09)
129SB G 1503.63 8 1.90 5
129SB DG $EG=1503.5 2, IG=2.4 7 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1762.00 10(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB CL J$1995St28 suggest 3/2+
129SB B 1.72 6 6.74 3
129SBS B EAV=901 14
129SB G 1117.06 8 2.39 5
129SB DG $EG=1116.7 1, IG=2.8 7 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1841.95 8(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB CL $1995St28 suggest 5/2+
129SB B 2.64 8 6.49 3
129SBS B EAV=864 14
129SB G 349.0 2 0.69 2
129SB DG $EG=348.7 2, IG=1.0 2 (1982Hu09)
129SB G 1196.98 5 2.97 5
129SB DG $EG=1196.9 2, IG=2,8 8 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1848.82 10 (5/2+)
129SB CL J$1995St28 (also 1987StZO) suggest 7/2+
129SB B 0.67 5 7.08 4
129SBS B EAV=861 14
129SB G 688.0 3 0.62 3
129SB G 1203.8 1 1.72 3
129SB DG $EG=1203.7 2, IG=2.5 7 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 1913.79 22(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 1.62 5 6.64 3
129SBS B EAV=831 14
129SB G 410.2 2 1.84 5
129SB L 2114.96 12(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 3.55 7 6.13 3
129SBS B EAV=740 13
129SB G 266.1 2 1.28 2
129SB G 353.1 2 0.44 2
129SB G 862.2 1 0.64 2 A
129SB dG RI$from figure III-30 of 1987StZO
129SB G 1470.4 1 1.67 4 A
129SB DG $EG=1470.3 2, IG=1.7 6 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 2154.87 12(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 0.63 2 6.84 4
129SBS B EAV=722 13
129SB G 1509.9 1 0.72 2
129SB dG RI$quoted as 7.42 {I2} in table III-14, but 7.2 in author's figure
129SB2dG III-30. Value taken from figure
129SB DG $EG=1510.0 3, IG=1.0 4 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 2180.94 10(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 4.00 9 6.01 3
129SBS B EAV=711 13
129SB G 332.2 2 0.30 2 B
129SB G 339.1 2 0.66 5
129SB DG $EG=339.7 2, IG=0.9 2 (1982Hu09)
129SB G 928.8 2 2.17 4
129SB G 1535.9 1 1.45 3
129SB DG $EG=1535.9 2, IG=1.8 6 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 2259.57 12(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 1.30 4 6.43 4
129SBS B EAV=676 13
129SB G 1614.6 1 1.48 4
129SB DG $EG=1613.5 2, IG=3.3 9 (1982Hu09)
129SB L 2383.41 22(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 0.97 9 6.43 6
129SBS B EAV=621 13
129SB G 890.3 2 1.1 1
129SB L 2392.91 10(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 1.02 11 6.40 6
129SBS B EAV=616 13
129SB G 1140.6 2 0.91 9
129SB G 1479.3 1 0.25 8
129SB L 2747.7 3(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 1.5 7 5.8 2
129SBS B EAV=462 13
129SB G 2102.7 3 1.7 8
129SB L 2785.4 4(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 1.02 3 5.94 5
129SBS B EAV=446 13
129SB G 1281.8 4 1.16 3
129SB L 2831.29 11(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 0.607 20 6.10 5
129SBS B EAV=426 13
129SB G 1327.69 8 0.69 2
129SB L 3093.9 5(1/2,3/2,5/2)
129SB B 0.4 2 5.9 2
129SBS B EAV=318 12
129SB G 2448.9 5 0.5 2