129TE 129SB B- DECAY (4.366 H) 1989WAZJ,1995STZZ 14NDS 201408
129TE H TYP=FUL$AUT=JANOS TIMAR AND ZOLTAN ELEKES, BALRAJ SINGH$
129TE2 H CIT=NDS 121, 143 (2014)$CUT=31-May-2014$
129TE c 1989WaZJ: {+129}Sb from fission, mass separated source,
129TE2c measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin
129TE c 1995StZZ: measured |g(|q) by low-temperature nuclear orientation
129TE2c method, deduced mixing ratios. This report is based on a thesis
129TE3c by M. Lindroos, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden
129TE c 1970Oh05: source from {+130}Te(|g,p). Measured E|g, I|g, |b; |g|g-
129TE2c and |b|g-coin. A total of 55 |g rays were reported with 48 placed
129TE3c amongst 22 levels; only one level at 1736 is not confirmed in 1989WaZJ
129TE c 1970Ca23: {+235}U(n,F) and {+130}Te(|g,p). Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g.
129TE2c A total of 85 gamma rays were reported with 60 placed amongst 33
129TE3c levels, nine of these levels have not been confirmed by 1989WaZJ
129TE c The present decay scheme is from 1989WaZJ, which represents an
129TE2c extension and major revision of previous decay schemes proposed in
129TE3c 1970Ca23 and 1970Oh05
129TE cB IB$From |g-ray intensity balance, unless otherwise stated. From the
129TE2cB level scheme, |b feeding to 180.37, 1/2+ level is 0.34% {I17},
129TE3cB whereas none is expected. In the opinion of the evaluators, this
129TE4cB apparent feeding is due to poor knowledge of the intensity of 180.42|g;
129TE5cB note that I|g=2.389 in 1989WaZJ is much lower which gives a
129TE6cB non-physical negative |b feeding of about 1.5%
129TE cG $U{-2}A{-2} values are from 1995StZZ
129TE CG $Following weak |g rays with E|g (I|g) reported in 1970Ca23 have not
129TE2CG been confirmed by 1989WaZJ and are omitted: 125.1 (w), 136.8
129TE3CG (w), 165.0 (0.08 2), 197.4 (0.15 5), 217.2 (0.03 2), 226.3 (0.05 2),
129TE4CG 232.1 (0.70 2), 950.6 (0.05 3), 984.3 (0.15 5), 1066.8 (0.12 7), 1139.2
129TE5CG (0.4 1), 1155.0 (w), 1161.8 (0.25 5), 1223.3 (0.4 1), 1752.3 (0.10 15),
129TE6CG 1919.2 (0.06 2), 1975.0 (0.17 3), 2011.1 (0.010 5), 2030.5 (0.02 1),
129TE7CG 2042.0 (0.010 5), 2091.5 (0.04 1), 2198.9 (0.13 3), 2262.5. Energy
129TE8CG uncertainty is |?1 keV
129TE cG E$From 1989WaZJ. The evaluators assign minimum uncertainty
129TE2cG of 0.1 keV for the purpose of least-squares fit. In Adopted
129TE3cG dataset increased uncertainties are used when taken from this
129TE4cG dataset. Values from 1970Ca23 and 1970Oh05 are listed in the dataset
129TE5cG under 'documentation' records
129TE cG RI$From 1989WaZJ, unless otherwise stated. The evaluators assign
129TE2cG minimum uncertainty of 1% for gamma-ray intensity in cases where
129TE3cG 1989WaZJ quote an uncertainty lower than 1%. Values from 1970Ca23
129TE4cG and 1970Oh05 are listed in the dataset under 'documentation' records
129TE cG E(A)$Doublet
129TE cG M$From |g(|q) and other considerations as explained in 1995StZZ.
129TE2cG Almost all mixing ratios are double values (a low |d and a high |d);
129TE3cG these are given under comments
129TE cL $The following levels proposed in 1970Ca23 have been omitted since
129TE2cL not confirmed by 1989WaZJ: 244.5, 350.1, 948.6, 1302.0, 1415.2,
129TE3cL 2042.0, 2199.0, 2221,6 and 2262.5
129TE cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data by assuming minimum uncertainty
129TE2cL of 0.1 keV for E|g. In addition following E|g values were left out
129TE3cL of the fitting procedure due to their poor fit in the level scheme:
129TE4cL 314.4 from 1481 level, 1646.79 from 1753 level, 1211.89 from 2086
129TE5cL level, 1669.16 from 2134 level. Without making these adjustments
129TE6cL and using the uncertainties as quoted in 1989WaZJ, reduced |h{+2}=64
129TE7cL and 53 E|g values fall outside 3|s. Using 0.05 minimum uncertainty
129TE8cL for E|g improved the fit but still with reduced |h{+2}=5.0 and
129TE9cL about 15 |g rays deviating from the fitted values by more than 3|s.
129TE cL J,T$From Adopted Levels
129SB P 0.0 7/2+ 4.366 H 26 2376 21
129SB cP QP$From 2012Wa38
129SB cP J,T$From {+129}Sb Adopted Levels
129TE N 0.482 6 1.0 1.0
129TE cN NR$Summed I(|g+ce)=97 {I1} to g.s. and 105.5 level. Beta feeding
129TE2cN to 105.49, 11/2- level is taken as 3% {I1} (1966Ta05). No |b feeding
129TE3cN is expected to g.s. About 1.5% absolute |g-ray intensity remains
129TE4cN unplaced in level scheme
129TE PN 3
129TE G 290.48 4 0.124 5
129TE G 398.97 5 0.143 6
129TE G 434.74 0.231
129TE DG $EG=434.9 10, IG=0.2 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 539.52 6 0.159 12
129TE G 566.96 2 0.283 5
129TE G 630.29
129TE G 688.59 8 0.34 3
129TE G 697.78 0.528
129TE G 703.36 5 0.198 8
129TE G 715.49 14 0.105 17
129TE G 939.52 0.398
129TE G 1042.30 6 0.088 6
129TE G 1053.02 5 0.109 6
129TE G 1238.62
129TE G 1276.13 7 0.213 19
129TE G 1421.23 0.078
129TE G 1483.04 0.085
129TE G 1724.31 2 0.276 4
129TE DG $EG=1724.1 20, IG=0.6 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE G 1727.77 2 0.060 13
129TE G 1917.36 3 0.112 3
129TE DG $EG=1916.5 12, IG=0.10 7 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1914.2 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1934.24 3 0.112 3
129TE DG $EG=1936.1 10, IG=0.08 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 2002.36 6 0.065 3
129TE G 2223.42 5 0.058 2
129TE L 0.0 3/2+ 69.6 M 3
129TE L 105.49 4 11/2- 33.6 D 1 M
129TE2 L %IT=63 17 $%B-=37 17
129TE B 3 1 9.76 15 1U
129TES B EAV=899.8 94
129TE CB IB$measured in singles |b spectrum (1966Ta05). This value is
129TE2CB consistent with a total feeding of {+129}Te g.s.=84.3% {I11} in
129TE3CB the fission yield study by 1969Er01.
129TE G 105.50 5 M4 429 7
129TE cG E,M$from Adopted Gammas
129TE cG TI$total transition intensity feeding the 105.5 level is 27.4 {I2},
129TE2cG out of which 17.3 units proceed by isomeric transition
129TES G KC=217 3$ LC=165.3 24$ MC=38.5 6$ NC=7.43 11$ OC=0.656 10
129TE L 180.37 4 1/2+
129TE cL J$isotropic |g(|q) consistent with 1/2
129TE G 180.42 1 5.9 3 [M1] 0.1318
129TE cG RI$from 1970Oh05. Value of 2.389 {I19} in 1989WaZJ seems too low
129TE2cG which gives non-physical negative |b feeding of |?1.5%
129TE DG $EG=180.8 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=180.6 10, IG=3.9 10 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.03 {I2}
129TE L 464.64 6 9/2(-)
129TE cL J$7/2- not allowed by |g(|q)
129TE B 0.38 3 9.19 4
129TES B EAV=740.6 95
129TE G 359.20 1 4.96 5 (M1+E2) 0.0216 4
129TE DG $EG=359.4 5, IG=6.6 6 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=358.8 4, IG=9.7 7 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.03 increased to 0.05
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.025 {I22} or -27 {I14} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.20 {I3}
129TE L 544.64 4 5/2+
129TE B 2.74 17 8.26 4
129TES B EAV=704.7 94
129TE G 364.21 3 0.632 16 [E2] 0.0209
129TE G 544.56 1 32.0 3 (M1+E2) 0.0070 6
129TE DG $EG=544.7 3, IG=41.7 21 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=543.8 4, IG=33.8 10 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.09 increased to 0.3
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.49 {I3} or +6.0 {I7} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I2}
129TE L 633.85 4 5/2+
129TE B 1.08 4 8.57 3
129TES B EAV=664.9 94
129TE G 453.44 1 1.116 13
129TE DG $EG=453.5 10, IG=1.8 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE G 633.74 1 5.24 5 (M1+E2)
129TEF G FL=0.0
129TE DG $EG=633.7 5, IG=6.4 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=633.5 4, IG=4.7 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.04 increased to 0.05
129TE DG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.16 4 or +2.3 3 for J(634)=3/2;
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.58 {I5} or +4.3 {I7} for J(634)=5/2 from
129TE2cG U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3}
129TE cG $Possible doublet.
129TE L 759.83 7 7/2-
129TE cL J$|g(|q) can fit 7/2, 9/2 and 11/2, but 7/2- from Adopted Levels
129TE B 3.77 6 7.90 3
129TES B EAV=609.1 93
129TE G 295.26 1 1.718 17 (M1+E2) 0.038 3
129TE DG $EG=295.5 6, IG=2.4 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=295.5 10, IG=2.8 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.009 increased to 0.017
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I4} or -6.3 {I15} for J(760)=7/2;
129TE2cG |d(E2/M1)=-0.65 {I9} or +3.5 {I8} for J(634)=9/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.13 {I3}
129TE3cG or -20 to +80 for J(634)=11/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.05 {I5}
129TE G 654.28 1 6.16 6
129TE DG $EG=654.3 5, IG=7.0 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=654.3 4, IG=6.9 5 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.06
129TE CG $E2 for J(760)=7/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.26 3 or -2.95 25 for J(634)=9/2;
129TE2cG |d(E2/M1)=-0.34 {I5} or +1.35 {I11} for J(634)=11/2 from
129TE3cG U{-2}A{-2}=-0.19 {I3}
129TE L 812.96 4 7/2+
129TE B 3.1 6 7.93 9
129TES B EAV=585.7 93
129TE G 268.48 2 0.444 7 (M1+E2) 0.051 5
129TE DG $EG=268.6 8, IG=0.6 1 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=268.3 10, IG=0.4 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.47 {I19} or +8.5 {I59} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.33 {I17}
129TE G 812.97 1 100.0 10 (E2)
129TE DG $EG=812.8 5, IG=100 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=812.6 4, IG=100 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.4 increased to 1.0
129TE cG M$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3} consistent with E2
129TE L 875.00 5 3/2+
129TE G 330.33 4 0.151 7
129TE G 694.77 3 0.837 20
129TE G 874.89 3 1.108 10 (M1+E2)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=0.00 {I2} or +3.9 {I4} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.40 {I3}
129TE L 966.86 4 5/2+
129TE B 2.29 13 7.89 4
129TES B EAV=518.6 91
129TE G 333.21 2 0.354 8
129TEF G FL=633.85
129TE DG $EG=332.3 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 421.72 10 0.104 8
129TEF G FL=544.64
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=422.22
129TE G 786.36 1 2.221 22 [E2]
129TE DG $EG=786.6 6, IG=4.4 4 (1970Oh05)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.006 increased to 0.0222
129TE G 966.78 1 18.58 19 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=966.4 6, IG=17.9 11 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=966.6 4, IG=16.8 7 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.06 increased to 0.19
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.18 {I1} or -9.1 {I10} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.02 {I2}
129TE L 1227.98 5 (7/2-,9/2+)
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). 5/2 ruled out by |g(|q) of 500|g from 1727 level;
129TE2cL 9/2 less favorable from |g(|q) of 525|g from 1754 level but not
129TE3cL ruled out
129TE B 2.07 8 7.59 4
129TES B EAV=407.2 89
129TE G 415.17 4 0.200 8
129TE G 682.77 1 11.94 12 A
129TEF G FL=544.64
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=683.34
129TE dG RI$uncertainty increased from 0.07 to 0.12.
129TE DG $EG=683.6 3, IG=13.5 9 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=683.5 4, IG=15.0 12 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $E2 for J(1228)=9/2; |d(E2/M1)=+0.46 {I8} or +4.8 {I14} for J(1228)=7/2
129TE2cG from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.36 {I2}
129TE G 1122.48 3 0.191 6
129TE DG $EG=1121.4 10, IG=0.10 5 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1281.72 5 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q) and decay modes; 7/2+ is not allowed by 1282|g(|q)
129TE B 0.693 21 7.99 4
129TES B EAV=384.7 88
129TE G 314.40 2 0.255 5
129TEF G FL=966.86
129TE DG $EG=313.5 10, IG=1.95 20 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 737.07 1 0.921 9 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=737.1 10, IG=0.9 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.003 increased to 0.009
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.11 {I18} or +2.4 {I10} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I16}
129TE G 1281.72 1 1.160 12 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1280.8 10, IG=1.3 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1280.8 10, IG=0.8 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.006 increased to 0.012
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I7} or -2.45 {I45} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.49 {I12}
129TE L 1318.23 5 7/2+
129TE B 4.02 7 7.17 4
129TES B EAV=369.6 87
129TE G 351.46 11 0.156 17
129TE G 505.33 1 1.074 11
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.006 increased to 0.011
129TE G 684.18 1 1.290 13
129TEF G FL=633.85
129TE G 773.37 1 5.86 6
129TE DG $EG=773.4 6, IG=6.4 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=773.1 10, IG=3.3 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.06
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.03 {I4} or +1.53 {I14} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.41 {I3}
129TEF G FL=544.64
129TE G 1318.30 1 0.958 10
129TE DG $EG=1317.2 10, IG=0.8 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1318.0 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.09 increased to 0.10
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.55 {I8} or +4.8 {I13} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.49 {I7}
129TE L 1384.96 10 (3/2-,5/2,7/2+)
129TE B 0.128 10 8.56 5
129TES B EAV=342.2 86
129TE G 840.17 22 0.057 19
129TE G 1384.98 3 0.208 5
129TE L 1405.69 8 (5/2,7/2,9/2+)
129TE B 0.109 4 8.60 4
129TES B EAV=333.8 86
129TE G 592.77 6 0.086 6
129TE G 861.00 3 0.141 3
129TE L 1460.82 9 (5/2,7/2,9/2+)
129TE B 0.192 20 8.26 6
129TES B EAV=311.4 85
129TE G 647.94 2 0.258 6
129TE G 826.75 16 0.14 4
129TE L 1481.26 8 (3/2-,5/2,7/2+)
129TE B 0.292 14 8.04 5
129TES B EAV=303.2 85
129TE G 514.43 8 0.304 25
129TE G 606.22 4 0.302 9
129TE L 1483.35 8 7/2+
129TE B 0.54 4 7.77 5
129TES B EAV=302.4 85
129TE G 670.31 4 1.99 7
129TE DG $EG=669.8 10, IG=1.9 4 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=669.7 10, IG=1.5 4 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1545.14 11 7/2+,9/2+
129TE B 0.050 4 8.69 6
129TES B EAV=277.8 84
129TE G 1000.50 8 0.104 8
129TE DG $EG=999.4 10, IG=0.3 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1581.99 6 7/2+
129TE B 0.441 22 7.68 5
129TES B EAV=263.3 83
129TE G 354.13 8 0.201 20
129TE G 707.08 3 0.286 9
129TE G 768.98 2 0.665 10
129TE L 1600.05 6 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). J|p=5/2- and 7/2+ are not allowed by |g(|q)
129TE B 2.94 5 6.82 5
129TES B EAV=256.3 82
129TE G 318.36 1 0.471 5
129TE DG $EG=318.0 10 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 787.16 1 3.60 4 (M1+E2)
129TE cG RI$from 1995StZZ. 1989WaZJ list 1.819 {I4}
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.06 {I24} or -1.4 {I79} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.11 {I9}
129TE G 1419.40 12 0.818 10 (E2)
129TE DG $EG=1418.6 11, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1415.2 10, IG=1.0 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $E2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.36 {I8}
129TE G 1600.13 1 1.201 12 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1598.5 9, IG=1.2 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1599.9 10, IG=0.90 8 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.012
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.77 {I11} or +2.7 {I6} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.65 {I7}
129TE L 1632.57 6 7/2-,9/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). 9/2- ruled out by 405|g(|q)
129TE B 3.15 7 6.72 5
129TES B EAV=243.7 82
129TE G 404.64 1 2.432 24 (M1+E2) 0.013 2
129TE DG $EG=405.0 7, IG=3.2 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=404.8 10, IG=3.8 4 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.024
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.47 {I5} or +3.65 {I65} for 9/2 to 7/2;
129TE2cG |d(E2/M1)=+0.10 {I4} or +0.71 {I16} for 9/2 to 9/2;
129TE3cG |d(E2/M1)=+0.12 {I19} or +0.93 {I34} for 7/2 to 7/2; |d(E2/M1)=-0.45
129TE4cG to -1.73 for 7/2 to 9/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.44 {I6}
129TE G 819.51 2 2.88 6
129TE G 1087.98 3 0.852 18
129TE DG $EG=1083.8 7, IG=1.2 4 (1970Oh05, unplaced); EG is in disagreement if
129TE2DG it corresponds to 1087.98 gamma from 1989WaZJ. G not reported in
129TE3DG 1970Ca23
129TE G 1167.95 2 0.525 7
129TE DG $EG=1167.8 10, IG=0.6 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1167.9 10, IG=0.4 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1656.12 7 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). 7/2 ruled out by 1656|g(|q)
129TE B 1.410 23 7.02 5
129TES B EAV=234.6 81
129TE G 1022.12 7 0.061 6
129TE G 1475.91 3 0.145 3
129TE G 1656.10 1 2.72 3 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1654.6 10, IG=2.3 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1655.9 10, IG=2.0 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.016 increased to 0.03
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.02 {I3} or -3.65 {I40} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.29 {I5}
129TE L 1727.95 5 (9/2)+
129TE B 29.9 5 5.53 5
129TES B EAV=207.3 79
129TE G 95.42 3 0.093 3 [D,E2] 1.1 9
129TE DG $EG=96.1 7, IG=0.4 1 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=94.9 10, IG=0.55 10 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 146.11 1 0.188 3 [M1+E2] 0.34 11
129TE DG $EG=146.6 7, IG=0.5 1 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=145.7 10, IG=0.8 1 (1970Ca23); 0.01 uncertainty in IG seems a
129TE2DG misprint
129TE G 244.53 1 0.837 8 [M1+E2] 0.067 9
129TE DG $EG=244.7 6, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=244.5 10, IG=2.2 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.008
129TE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.35 {I11}
129TE G 409.71 2 0.480 10
129TE G 499.99 1 0.892 9
129TE DG $EG=499.6 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.009
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.14 to -3.2 for J(1228)=7/2 from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.8 {I3};
129TE2cG no fit if J(1228)=5/2 or 9/2
129TE G 761.12 1 8.96 9 (E2)
129TE DG $EG=761.0 5, IG=8.8 6 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=760.8 4, IG=6.0 8 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.05 increased to 0.09
129TE cG M$U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I3} consistent with E2
129TE G 914.96 1 48.4 5 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=914.6 5, IG=46.6 25 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=914.7 4, IG=43.3 9 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.17 increased to 0.5
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.105 {I15} or -15.5 {I30} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}
129TE G 1263.30 1 1.887 19 (E1)
129TE DG $EG=1261.3 10, IG=1.7 4 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1261.1 10, IG=2.7 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.016 increased to 0.019
129TE CG $U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I6} consistent with E1
129TE G 1622.46 1 0.431 4 (E1(+M2))
129TE DG $EG=1621.1 12, IG=0.6 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1622.0 10, IG=0.30 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.002 increased to 0.004
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I10} or -17 {I13} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.06 {I14};
129TE2cG but |D(J|p) required E1
129TE L 1751.11 13 (5/2,7/2,9/2)
129TE B 1.55 4 6.76 6
129TES B EAV=198.7 79
129TE G 523.13 12 3.21 6 A
129TE DG $EG=523.8 5, IG=3.7 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=523.3 10, IG=3.7 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=-0.24 {I6}
129TE L 1753.32 6 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q) and particle-transfer data. 3/2+ not allowed by
129TE2cL 525|g(|q) and 941|g(|q)
129TE B 2.16 5 6.61 6
129TES B EAV=197.9 79
129TE G 435.04 9 0.44 3 A
129TE G 471.54 9 0.094 8
129TE G 525.23 0.341
129TE dG RI$1995StZZ list 3.21 {I6} which is the value for 523.13|g in 1989WaZJ
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.34 {I7} or +4.0 {I75} for J(1228)=7/2 from
129TE2cG U{-2}A{-2}=-0.24 {I6}; no fit if J(1228)=9/2
129TE G 940.51 12 1.59 7 A
129TE DG $EG=939.7 7, IG=1.7 4 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=939.4 10, IG=2.0 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.68 to -1.11 from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.45 {I5}
129TE G 1209.03 3 1.95 3 (M1+E2)
129TEF G FL=544.64
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1208.68
129TE DG $EG=1208.5 7, IG=2.1 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1208.1 10, IG=0.6 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.30 {I5} or +4.0 {I75} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.08 {I5}
129TE G 1646.79 5 0.056 2 [E3]
129TEF G FL=105.49
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1647.83
129TE L 1762.46 8 (5/2+)
129TE B 0.0656 20 8.11 6
129TES B EAV=194.5 79
129TE G 1582.11 5 0.070 3
129TE DG $EG=1581.1 10, IG=0.18 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1762.42 5 0.066 2
129TE L 1777.8 10 (5/2,7/2,9/2+)
129TE B 0.053 25 8.2 2
129TES B EAV=188.8 78
129TE G 1233.2 6 0.11 5
129TE L 1779.79 10 5/2+
129TE B 0.0781 22 7.99 6
129TES B EAV=188.1 78
129TE G 1779.78 4 0.162 4
129TE DG $EG=1779.5 10, IG=0.04 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1843.62 5 (9/2)+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q) and log {Ift}=5.3 from 7/2+
129TE B 25.5 4 5.31 6
129TES B EAV=164.8 76
129TE G 115.84 4 0.181 6 [M1+E2] 0.7 3
129TE DG $EG=116.2 7, IG=0.4 1 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=115.6 10, IG=0.40 3 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 876.65 3 5.70 13
129TE DG $EG=876.2 7, IG=6.0 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=876.0 4, IG=4.3 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1030.65 1 31.4 3 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1030.1 6, IG=29.3 18 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1030.4 4, IG=28.5 11 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.12 increased to 0.3
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.077 {I13} or -10.8 {I15} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.146 {I21}
129TE G 1738.16 1 15.46 15
129TE DG $EG=1736.5 10, IG=13.9 17 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1738.1 4, IG=12.6 11 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.06 increased to 0.15
129TE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.114 {I19}
129TE G 1843.49 1 0.043 12 [M3] ?
129TE DG $EG=1841.8 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 1867.71 11 (5/2,7/2+)
129TE B 0.105 4 7.62 7
129TES B EAV=156.2 76
129TE G 992.70 4 0.217 8
129TE L 1871.61 5 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q) and decay modes. J=5/2-,7/2- not allowed by 1327|g(|q)
129TE B 1.533 23 6.45 7
129TES B EAV=154.8 75
129TE G 589.98 25 0.046 13
129TE G 996.54 3 0.365 8
129TE DG $EG=995.4 11, IG=0.3 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE G 1237.81 12 0.501 10 (M1+E2) A
129TE DG $EG=1237.4 15, IG=0.6 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1236.7 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.09 {I6} or -5.3 {I17} for J(634)=3/2;
129TE2cG |d(E2/M1)=-0.65 {I17} or -7 to +10 for J(634)=5/2
129TE3cG from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.18 {I10}
129TE G 1326.98 1 1.442 14 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1325.9 10, IG=1.2 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1326.9 10, IG=0.80 15 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.014
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.30 {I15} or +0.92 {I24} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.56 {I6}
129TE G 1691.24 4 0.088 3
129TE DG $EG=1691.4 10, IG=0.15 5 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1871.58 1 0.739 7 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1869.9 11, IG=0.7 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1871.8 10, IG=0.56 5 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.005 increased to 0.007
129TE cG $ |d(E2/M1)=-0.07 {I6} or -2.75 {I55} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.43 {I10}
129TE L 1921.30 11 (5/2)+
129TE B 0.100 3 7.48 7
129TES B EAV=137.3 74
129TE G 1287.45 3 0.208 5
129TE L 1939.45 7 (5/2,7/2,9/2)
129TE B 0.174 4 7.18 8
129TES B EAV=131.0 73
129TE G 657.61
129TE G 1126.57 3 0.248 6
129TE DG $EG=1125.4 10, IG=0.25 5 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1179.63 4 0.112 4
129TE L 2071.42 5 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). 7/2+ ruled out by 2071|g(|q)
129TE B 2.46 4 5.5 1
129TES B EAV=87.0 68
129TE G 1104.52 1 0.707 7 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1104.3 10, IG=0.5 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1104.5 10, IG=0.7 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.005 increased to 0.007
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.13 {I12} or +2.45 {I75} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.25 {I11}
129TE G 1196.42 2 0.177 3
129TE G 1258.44 1 0.834 8 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1257.0 18, IG=0.8 4 (1970Oh05)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.37 {I15} or -2.05 {I65} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.24 {I10}
129TE G 1437.52 2 0.655 10 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1436.1 12, IG=0.7 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1435.7 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.03 {I8} or -4.1 {I13} for J(634)=3/2;
129TE2cG |d(E2/M1)=-1.0 {I4} or -2.2 to +45 for J(634)=5/2
129TE3cG from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.28 {I13}
129TE G 1526.84 1 1.136 11 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1525.9 10, IG=1.0 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1526.0 10, IG=0.60 13 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.007 increased to 0.011
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I9} or +2.1 {I5} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I8}
129TE G 1606.72 1 0.041 4
129TE G 1891.10 7 0.033 2
129TE G 2071.36 1 1.513 15 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=2069.6 15, IG=1.3 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=2071.6 10, IG=1.00 15 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.009 increased to 0.015
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.29 {I8} or +1.55 {I25} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.74 {I8}
129TE L 2086.10 6 (7/2+)
129TE B 0.67 7 6.0 1
129TES B EAV=82.3 68
129TE G 1211.89 17 0.79 13
129TEF G FL=875.00
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1211.10
129TE G 1273.10 2 0.341 7
129TE DG $EG=1273.0 15, IG=0.6 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE G 1541.47 3 0.139 4
129TE DG $EG=1540.0 15, IG=0.3 1 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1538.0 10, IG=0.15 4 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 2086.11 2 0.112 2
129TE L 2114.62 4 5/2+
129TE cL J$from |g(|q). 7/2+ ruled out by 2115|g(|q)
129TE B 2.06 4 5.4 1
129TES B EAV=73.3 66
129TE G 796.21 6 0.084 6
129TE G 832.99 16 0.13 3
129TE G 1147.59 3 0.185 5
129TE DG $EG=1147.2 10, IG=0.05 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1301.45 5 0.419 16
129TE DG $EG=1300.0 12, IG=0.6 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1302.7 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1480.94 12 0.774 11 A
129TE DG $EG=1479.7 10, IG=1.1 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1480.7 10, IG=1.1 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1570.09 1 1.810 18 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=1568.7 8, IG=1.6 2 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=1570.1 10, IG=1.50 15 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.010 increased to 0.018
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=-0.10 {I5} or +2.1 {I3} from U{-2}A{-2}=-0.28 {I5}
129TE G 2114.67 1 0.868 9 (M1+E2)
129TE DG $EG=2113.0 15, IG=0.8 3 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=2114.5 10, IG=0.5 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE dG RI$uncertainty of 0.004 increased to 0.009
129TE cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.17 {I5} or -9.2 {I33} from U{-2}A{-2}=+0.04 {I8}
129TE L 2131.24 8 7/2-
129TE B 0.216 9 6.3 1
129TES B EAV=68.2 66
129TE G 849.57 5 0.157 6
129TE G 903.19 8 0.291 15
129TE L 2134.89 8 (5/2-,7/2+)
129TE B 0.119 3 6.5 1
129TES B EAV=67.1 65
129TE G 1501.04 4 0.124 4
129TE DG $EG=1499.3 10, IG=0.2 1 (1970Ca23)
129TE G 1669.16 7 0.045 3
129TEF G FL=464.64
129TE cG E$poor fit, level-energy difference=1670.25
129TE G 2134.86 3 0.077 2
129TE DG $EG=2133.2 15, IG=0.10 5 (1970Oh05)
129TE DG $EG=2135.9 10 (1970Ca23)
129TE L 2265.29 8 (5/2+,7/2+)
129TE B 0.46 4 4.8 3
129TES B EAV=28.9 59
129TE G 1037.29 4 0.636 20
129TE G 1298.7 4 0.24 8
129TE G 2265.27 4 0.070 2
129TE DG $EG=2265.8 10, IG=0.04 2 (1970Ca23)