129TE    129SB B- DECAY (17.7 M)       1995ZH37,1987ST23,1982HU0914NDS    201408
129TE  H TYP=FUL$AUT=JANOS TIMAR AND ZOLTAN ELEKES, BALRAJ SINGH$
129TE2 H CIT=NDS 121, 143 (2014)$CUT=31-May-2014$
129TE c  1988StZQ, 1987St23: {+235}U(n,F) E=th, on-line mass separator;
129TE2c  Ge detector, E|g, I|g, ce, |g|g-coin, half-life
129TE c  1982Hu09: {+235}U(n,F) E=th, on-line mass separator; Ge detector,
129TE2c  |g|g-coin, half-life. A total of 29 |g rays reported up to 1843 keV,
129TE3c  but only a few are common with those from 1987St23
129TE c  1988Go19 assigned a 16.7-min isomer to {+131}Sb based on observation
129TE2c  433.8 and 642.3 gamma rays, but in an erratum (Phys. Rev. C 39, 1646
129TE3c  (1989) the authors revised its assignment to {+129}Sb based on the
129TE4c  work of 1982Hu09 and 1987St23; and also stated that 433.8 and 642.3
129TE5c  |g rays were in coin with a 759|g. While 433.8 and 759|g are confirmed
129TE6c  in this decay, the origin of 642|g is not known.
129TE c  1995Zh37: 17.7-min isomer produced in {+130}Te({+64}Ni,X) at 275 MeV.
129TE2c  The authors estimate that |?68% decay feeds the 1958, (21/2-) level
129TE3c  in {+129}Te which decays by 434-658-760 |g cascade to 11/2- isomer
129TE4c  at 105 keV.
129TE cB IB$From intensity balance. These feedings should be considered
129TE2cB as approximate since the decay scheme is not well established
129TE tG $-------------------------------------------------------------
129TE tG $               Gamma-ray data from 1982Hu09
129TE tG $  E|g        I|g      Level        E|g        I|g        Level
129TE tG $
129TE TG $  39.0 2   6.0 20   1548.5      583.3 4   1.5 5
129TE TG $  61.1 8   3.0 10               657.78 8# 92 8     1417.6@
129TE TG $  63.6 9  10.0 30               684.6 2#  3.5 10   2102.1
129TE TG $ 130.9 1   6.0 20               759.8 1# 100.0 9    759.8@
129TE TG $ 146.0 2   1.8 5                788.7 2   4.0 15   1548.5@
129TE TG $ 186.0 4   1.7 5                793.5 3   5.0 15
129TE TG $ 250.5 2   2.0 5    2102.1      825.4 3   8.5 30
129TE TG $ 281.1 4   1.0 3               1063.2 4   2.0 10
129TE TG $ 346.9 3   2.0 5               1068.8 2#  4.0 15   1828.4
129TE TG $ 410.8 1#  8.5 20   1828.4     1091.4 2   3.0 10   1851.4
129TE TG $ 433.76 8# 73 8     1851.4@    1225.5 2   4.0 10
129TE TG $ 435.6 3   1.8 5               1327.1 3   2.8 10
129TE TG $ 438.0 2   1.8 5               1417.6 3   3.4 12   1417.6
129TE TG $ 443.0 4   1.4 5               1843.1 5   1.8 5
129TE TG $ 453.5 2   4.0 12
129TE TG $
129TE TG $  @Energy of 105 keV should be added since the cascades are built
129TE TG $   on 105-keV, 11/2- isomer.
129TE TG $  # |g near this energy reported in 1988StZQ
129TE tG $------------------------------------------------------------------
129TE tG $
129TE tG $------------------------------------------------------------------
129TE tG $           Gamma-ray data from 1988StZQ, 1987St23
129TE tG $  E|g         Level       E|g         Level
129TE tG $
129TE TG $  232        2190       544@         544
129TE TG $  239        2020       658#        1524
129TE TG $  257        1781       684#@       1228
129TE TG $  307        2109       752         2275
129TE TG $  320        2109       754         1621
129TE TG $  314&       1934       761#         857
129TE TG $  341        2275       814@         814
129TE TG $  405        1623       877         1744
129TE TG $  410#       1934       929         1796
129TE TG $  434        1958      1031         1845
129TE TG $  523        2157      1067#        1934
129TE TG $
129TE TG $  & 314|g shown incorrectly from 1958 level in Fig 6 of 1988StZQ
129TE TG $  # |g near this energy reported in 1982Hu09
129TE TG $  @ |g may be from decay of 4.366-h {+129}Sb populated by ^IT decay
129TE TG $    of 17.7-min {+129}Sb
129TE TG $ -----------------------------------------------------------------
129TE cG E,RI$From 1982Hu09, unless otherwise stated
129TE cL $Since the gamma-ray data from 1982Hu09 and 1988StZQ are in severe
129TE2cL disagreement, only those transitions are placed in a level scheme
129TE3cL which are consistent with in-beam high-spin |g-ray data from 1998Zh09,
129TE4cL 1995Zh37
129TE cL J,T$From Adopted Levels
129SB  P 1850.31   6 (19/2-)           17.7 M    1              2376      21
129SB CP QP$From 2012Wa38
129SB cP E,J,T$From {+129}Sb Adopted Levels
129TE  N 1.0                   0.85    AP 1.177
129TE cN NR$I|g(759.8)=100
129TE PN                                                                     3
129TE  L 0.0         3/2+              69.6 M    3
129TE  L 105.50    5 11/2-             33.6 D    1                           M
129TE2 L %IT=63 17$%B-=37 17$
129TE  G 105.50    5             M4
129TE cG E,M$from Adopted Gammas
129TE  L 865.3     1  15/2(-)
129TE  G 759.8     1  100.0  9
129TE  L 1523.08   14  19/2(-)
129TE  B               9     AP           7.2    AP
129TE  G 657.78    8   92    8
129TE  L 1654.0    1 (17/2-,19/2-)
129TE  B               10    AP           7.1    AP
129TES B EAV=1042.9 97
129TE  G 130.9     1  6.0    20 [M1]                   0.32
129TE  G 788.7     2  4.0    15
129TE  L 1956.84   16 (21/2-)
129TE  B               63    AP           6.1    AP
129TES B EAV=903.8 96
129TE cB IB$1995Zh37 estimate |?68%
129TE  G  433.76   8   73    8 [E2]                    0.0123