129CS 129CS IT DECAY (0.718 US) 1978DE29 14NDS 201408
129CS H TYP=FUL$AUT=JANOS TIMAR AND ZOLTAN ELEKES, BALRAJ SINGH$
129CS2 H CIT=NDS 121, 143 (2014)$CUT=31-May-2014$
129CS c 1978De29: measured E|g, I|g, half-life, g factor
129CS cG E,M,MR$From Adopted dataset for {+129}Cs
129CS cG RI$Branching ratios of |g rays from 575-keV isomer taken from Adopted
129CS2cG dataset. Based on these values, intensities for |g rays from lower
129CS3cG levels are deduced
129CS cL E,J,T$From Adopted Levels, unless otherwise stated
129CS P 575.45 5 (11/2-) 0.718 US 21
129CS N 0.526 20 0.526 20 1.0
129CS cN NR$ Summed transition intensity=100 for |g rays from 575-keV isomer
129CS PN 3
129CS L 0.0 1/2+ 32.06 H 6
129CS2 L %EC+%B+=100
129CS L 6.57 4 5/2+ 72 NS 6
129CS G 6.55 5 E2 4.32E+5 189 10
129CS L 135.58 4 3/2+
129CS G 129.14 9 1.7 2 M1+E2 0.20 5 0.449 9
129CSS G KC=0.381 7$LC=0.054 3$MC=0.0112 6$
129CSS G NC=0.00236 12$OC=0.000322 13$PC=1.477E-5 21
129CS G 135.61 9 0.24 4 [M1,E2] 0.51 13
129CSS G KC=0.39 7$LC=0.09 5$MC=0.019 11$
129CSS G NC=0.0040 21$OC=0.00050 24$PC=1.32E-5 5
129CS L 188.94 5 7/2+ 2.26 NS 6
129CS G 53.2 1 0.15 2 E2 18.6
129CSS G KC=6.53 10$LC=9.52 16$MC=2.08 4$
129CSS G NC=0.419 7$OC=0.0474 8$PC=0.000174 3
129CS G 182.32 5 68 8 M1+E2 0.25 2 0.1718 25
129CSS G KC=0.1463 21$LC=0.0203 4$MC=0.00417 8$
129CSS G NC=0.000879 16$OC=0.0001209 20$PC=5.65E-6 8
129CS L 209.08 5 (5/2)+ ?
129CS G 73.2 1 [M1,E2] 4.0 18 ?
129CSS G KC=2.5 6$LC=1.2 10$MC=0.26 21$
129CSS G NC=0.05 5$OC=0.006 5$PC=7.7E-5 3
129CS G 202.38 7 M1(+E2) 0.2 2 0.128 4 ?
129CSS G KC=0.1094 23$LC=0.0148 14$MC=0.0030 3$
129CSS G NC=0.00064 6$OC=8.8E-5 7$PC=4.25E-6 7
129CS L 220.75 4 3/2+ ?
129CS G 85.1 1 [M1,E2] 2.4 10 ?
129CSS G KC=1.6 4$LC=0.6 5$MC=0.13 10$
129CSS G NC=0.027 20$OC=0.0032 23$PC=5.05E-5 25
129CS G 214.30 7 M1(+E2) 0.5 5 0.113 8 ?
129CSS G KC=0.095 4$LC=0.014 3$MC=0.0029 7$
129CSS G NC=0.00061 13$OC=8.3E-5 14$PC=3.59E-6 11
129CS G 220.83 7 [M1,E2] 0.110 10 ?
129CSS G KC=0.090 5$LC=0.015 5$MC=0.0032 9$
129CSS G NC=0.00067 18$OC=8.7E-5 20$PC=3.21E-6 16
129CS L 426.49 5 (9/2+)
129CS G 237.65 9 12.1 12 (M1) 0.0822
129CS G 419.83 7 94 7
129CS L 575.45 5 (11/2-) 0.718 US 21 M
129CS2 L %IT=100
129CS2 L MOMM1=+6.55 10 (1978De29)
129CS cL MOMM1$TDPAD method (1978De29).
129CS cL T$from |g|g(t); weighted average of 0.734 |ms {I23} (1978De29),
129CS2cL and 0.69 |ms {I3} (1977Ch23). Other: 0.73 |ms {I7} (1979Ga01, same
129CS3cL group as 1978De29)
129CS G 149.05 8 100 5 (E1) 0.0722
129CSS G KC=0.0621 9$LC=0.00811 12$MC=0.001649 24$
129CSS G NC=0.000344 5$OC=4.65E-5 7$PC=2.03E-6 3
129CS G 354.8 [M4] 1.369 ?
129CS cG E$|g reported only by 1983TaZI in |e decay with an upper limit of
129CS2cG intensity. It is neither seen in any other decay study (1972Ta02,
129CS3cG 1973Is04) nor in in-beam |g-ray data; thus it is considered as
129CS4cG questionable by the evaluators
129CSS G KC=1.045 15$LC=0.255 4$MC=0.0558 8$
129CSS G NC=0.01173 17$OC=0.001542 22$PC=5.80E-5 9
129CS G 365.86 8 [E3] 0.0789 ?
129CS cG E$|g not reported in in-beam |g-ray data; B(E3)(W.u.)=400 {I50} is a
129CS2cG factor of 4 larger than RUL, thus this transition is considered suspect
129CSF G FL=209.08$
129CSS G KC=0.0594 9$LC=0.01547 22$MC=0.00332 5$
129CSS G NC=0.000683 10$OC=8.52E-5 12$PC=2.10E-6 3
129CS G 386.7 1 64 5 [M2] 0.0862
129CSS G KC=0.0727 11$LC=0.01073 15$MC=0.00223 4$
129CSS G NC=0.000471 7$OC=6.51E-5 10$PC=3.12E-6 5
129CS G 569.3 1 12.7 18[E3] 0.01750
129CSF G FL=6.57$