129CS 129BA EC DECAY (2.23 H) 1983TAZI,1973IS04,1972TA0214NDS 201408
129CS H TYP=FUL$AUT=JANOS TIMAR AND ZOLTAN ELEKES, BALRAJ SINGH$
129CS2 H CIT=NDS 121, 143 (2014)$CUT=31-May-2014$
129CS c The decay schemes of the g.s. and isomer of {+129}Cs seem complex,
129CS2c especially for the isomer decay. First level scheme was proposed in
129CS3c 1970Is04, later expanded by 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04. First attempt to
129CS4c tentatively separate the decay schemes was made in 1972-NDS (1972Ho55).
129CS5c Based on detailed |g|g coincidences with two Ge detectors and producing
129CS6c the source in different reactions producing different composition of
129CS7c low-spin and high-spin activities, 1983TaZI present evidence for
129CS7c two separate decay schemes, which are adopted here, although labeled as
129CS8c tentative by 1983TaZI. For the isomer decay, the gamma-ray energies and
129CS9c the decay scheme are almost identical to those given in 1973Is04.
129CSAc There is good agreement of gamma-ray energies between 1973Is04 (and
129CSBc 1983TaZI) and 1972Ta02, but a large number of differences exist in the
129CSCc placement of transitions and levels. The evaluators prefer to adopt
129CSDc level schemes from 1983TaZI and 1973Is04 due to better |g|g coincidence
129CSEc data with two Ge(Li) detectors. However, in the opinion of the
129CSFc evaluators, none of the studies cited above can be considered as well
129CSGc established, since many |g-ray remain either unplaced or unconfirmed.
129CSHc Further experiments are recommended to improve knowledge of these decay
129CSIc schemes using state-of-the-art detector systems and better source
129CSJc production methods to avoid large number of impurities present in
129CSKc previous studies.
129CS c 1983TaZI: {+129}Ba source formed in three reactions:
129CS2c {+120}Sn({+12}C,3n){+129}Ba, {+121}Sb({+12}C,4n){+129}La followed by
129CS3c |e decay of {+129}La to {+129}Ba g.s. and isomer, {+130}Ba(|g,n). The
129CS4c other two reactions also form both the g.s. and isomer of {+129}Ba,
129CS5c albeit in different proportions, thus facilitating separation of
129CS6c gamma rays and their intensities into separate decay schemes. Measured
129CS7c E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin using two Ge detectors. 1983TaZI is a short
129CS8c note in an annual laboratory report. In July 2011, the evaluators,
129CS9c on communication with T. Tamura (first author of 1983TaZI), were
129CSAc informed that there was no further report or follow-up of this work.
129CSBc work reported in 1983TaZI. Note that many features of the data
129CSCc presented in this short report are common with those in 1973Is04
129CS c 1973Is04 (also 1971Is02,1970Is04): mixed (g.s. and isomer) source from
129CS2c {+133}Cs(p,5n); measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin with two Ge detectors, ce,
129CS3c ce|g(t) with |p|62 air-core |b-ray magnetic spectrometer. In 1971Is02,
129CS4c lifetime of 188-keV level was measured by (ce-L)(|g)(t) method. In
129CS5c 1970Is04, a first detailed decay scheme of {+129}Ba was proposed with
129CS6c with 15 excited states and 49 |g rays. In 1973Is04, a total of
129CS7c 176 |g rays were reported with 107 |g rays placed in a composite level
129CS8c scheme from both activities, thus no |e,|b{++} feedings and log {Ift}
129CS9c values were deduced. Half-lives of the two activities were measured
129CS c 1972Ta02: mixed source from {+130}Ba(|g,n) with dominant activity from
129CS2c {+129}Ba g.s. decay in contrast to other studies where dominant
129CS3c activity in the source material was from the decay of {+129}Ba isomer.
129CS4c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g coin using Ge and NaI(Tl) detector. A total of
129CS3c 118 |g rays reported with 100 placed in a proposed decay scheme of
129CS4c {+129}Ba. Conversion coefficients were deduced by using |g-ray data
129CS5c from this work and ce data from 1961Ar05. Since a composite decay
129CS5c scheme was proposed for g.s. and isomer decay of {+129}Ba, no |e,|b{++}
129CS6c feedings and log {Ift} values were deduced. Several levels and many
129CS7c placements differ from those in 1983TaZI and 1973Is04. Half-lives of
129CS8c the two activities were measured. Low-spin activity composition in the
129CS9c source material was about four times higher than in the source
129CSAc material used in 1973Is04
129CS c 1961Ar05: mixed source. Measured positron spectra, ce data. A total of
129CS2c about 62 transition energies were deduced up to 1624 keV from K-, L-
129CS3c and subshell lines. Another 45 lines in the ce-energy region of
129CS4c 49-1143 keV with half-life of |?2 h were unassigned. Deduced
129CS5c intensities of three positron branches. Half-lives of most of the
129CS6c observed transitions were measured. No level scheme was proposed,
129CS7c however strong |b{++} branch feeding the g.s. of {+129}Cs was
129CS8c indicated. Half-lives of the two activities were measured
129CS c Others:
129CS c 1976Be11: measured lifetime of 6.5-keV level by |g(ce)(t)
129CS c 1966Li05: measured half-lives of the two activities from |g rays
129CS c 1963Ya05: measured half-life of the composite source
129CS c 1959He45: measured E|g, |b|g coin, half-life, eight |g rays reported
129CS2c with a proposed 1450-182 |g cascade.
129CS c 1950Th08, 1950Fi11: identification and production of {+129}Ba isotope
129CS2c in proton bombardment of {+133}Cs
129CS CE $Total measured positron intensity=6% (1961Ar05)
129CS CE TI,IE$From |g-ray intensity balance. Weak feedings (<2% or so) are
129CS2CE considered as tentative since there still remain many unplaced
129CS3CE |g rays.
129CS CE LOGFT$For weak (<2% or so) EC feedings, values are considered as
129CS2CE approximate
129CS CG CC$Overlaps M1 and E2 values for M1+E2, or M1,E2 transitions
129CS cG $All the unplaced |g rays are listed with the decay of the isomer
129CS CG E$From unweighted average of values from 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS2CG (or 1983TaZI). Uncertainties are provided only by 1972Ta02. In
129CS2CG 1983TaZI, most energies are the same as in 1973Is04. Based on
129CS4CG comparison of values in three studies, evaluators assign the
129CS5CG uncertainties as follows: |D(E|g)=0.10 KEV for I|g|>3%, 0.20 KEV for
129CS6CG I|g=0.5-3%, and 0.3 keV or I|g<0.5%. Document records
129CS7CG in the ENSDF database provide compiled E|g values from 1973Is04,
129CS8CG 1972Ta02, and 1961Ar05
129CS CG RI$From 1983TaZI, unless otherwise noted. Uncertainties are not given
129CS2CG by 1983TaZI. The evaluators assign the uncertainties as follows:
129CS3CG |D(RI)=5% for I|g|>5%, 10% for I|g<5%
129CS4CG Document records in the ENSDF database provide compiled I|g, ICE(K),
129CS5CG K/L ratios from 1973Is04, 1972Ta02, and 1961Ar05
129CS CG M$From 1973Is04, unless otherwise noted. Values EKC, K/L and
129CS2CG L-subshell ratios are from private communication to 1996Te01 from
129CS3CG 1973Is04. Other multipolarities are deduced by evaluators
129CS4CG of current evaluation using I|g values from 1973Is04 and ICE(K) and/or
129CS5CG K/L ratios from 1961Ar05. For |g rays above 350 keV or so, such
129CS6CG assignments are tentative since the agreement between deduced EKC
129CS7CG values and theoretical values from ^Br^Icc code is poor
129CS CG E(A)$|g from 1983TaZI only. 2105.8|g and 2086.2|g placed from a 2308.6
129CS2CG level, but the energy fit is poor, thus the evaluators have kept these
129CS3CG as unplaced. None of the two |g rays was reported in 1973Is04 and
129CS4CG 1972Ta02
129CS CL $In a composite level scheme for GS and isomer decay, 1970Is04
129CS2CL (earlier paper from authors of 1973Is04) reported 15 levels at 129,1,
129CS3CL 182.3, 202.3, 214.3, 419.8, 595.9, 641.3, 683.8, 748.6, 962.6, 985.3,
129CS4CL 1248.7, 1640.8, 1674.5, 1805.2. In their later paper 1971Is02, first
129CS5CL excited state was indicates at 6.5 KEV. Thus all level energies in
129CS6CL in 1970Is04 should be increased upwards by 6.5 KEV. A total of 49
129CS7CL transitions were placed amongst these levels
129CS CL $In a composite level scheme for GS and isomer decay, 1972Ta02 report
129CS2CL 31 levels at 6.48, 135.6, 188.8, 208.8, 220.8, 426.8,
129CS3CL 554.4, 603.6, 648.4, 690.5, 755.3, 969.6, 992.4, 1165.0, 1208.4,
129CS4CL 1256.1, 1299.4, 1450.8, 1459.1, 1487.3, 1648.2, 1681.5, 1682.7,
129CS5CL 1812.5, 1830.5, 1922.8, 1954.0, 2076.0, 2143.8, 2178.8, 2422.2. Nine
129CS6CL of these at 1208.4, 1299.4, 1450.8, 1459.1, 1487.3, 1682.7, 2143.8,
129CS7CL 2178.8 and 2422.3 have been omitted here since these are not confirmed
129CS7CL in 1983TaZI and 1973Is04. The gamma rays from these levels have either
129CS8CL not been confirmed or placed elsewhere in the level schemes based on
129CS9CL |g|g coin data with two Ge detectors in 1983TaZI and 1973Is04
129CS CL $In a composite level scheme for GS and isomer decay, 1973Is04 report
129CS2CL 24 levels at 6.54, 135.5, 188.9, 209.1, 220.8, 426.5,
129CS2CL 551.6, 554.9, 575.4, 603.4, 648.4, 690.3, 755.2, 879.1, 969.2, 991.9,
129CS3CL 1156.2, 1255.6, 1647.9, 1681.4, 1812.5, 1940.4, 1953.8, 2018.9. All
129CS4CL The level scheme for the isomer decay is essentially the same as in
129CS5CL 1983TaZI
129CS CL $1983TaZI report 16 levels populated in the decay of GS of {+129}Ba
129CS2CL and 23 levels from the decay of isomer in {+129}Ba; five low-lying
129CS3CL levels amongst these are populated in the decay of both the activities.
129CS4CL A 2308.6 level reported in 1983TaZI is discarded due to poor fit of
129CS5CL of the two |g rays 2105.8 and 2086.2 from this level. Their level
129CS6CL scheme for isomer decay is almost identical to that given in 1973Is04
129CS cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data.
129CS cL E(A)$Level from 1983TaZI and 1972Ta02; not reported in 1973Is04
129CS cL E(B)$Level from 1983TaZI, not reported in 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS cL J$From Adopted Levels
129BA P 0.0 1/2+ 2.23 H 11 2436 11
129BA cP QP$From 2012Wa38
129BA cP J,T$From {+129}Ba Adopted Levels
129CS N 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
129CS cN NR$Absolute intensities per 100 decays of {+129}Ba are given by
129CS2cN 1983TaZI
129CS PN 3
129CS G 2086.2 A
129CS G 2105.8 A
129CS L 0.0 1/2+ 32.06 H 6
129CS cL T$from Adopted Levels.
129CS E 13 1 47 1 5.63 3 60 1
129CSS E EAV=634.9 50$CK=0.671 4$CL=0.0910 5$CM+=0.02512 14
129CS CE E$1425 15 (B+ end-point energy), relative B+ intensity=780 (measured
129CS2CE in 1961Ar05)
129CS CE TI$from intensity balance. 1983TaZI give 69 6
129CS L 6.5450 10 5/2+ 72 NS 6
129CS CL T$from (129.1-214.3 KEV G)(6.54 CEM+CEN)(T) (1976Be11)
129CS G 6.545 1 E2 3.98E+5 6 23.6 9
129CSS G LC=3.15E5 5$MC=6.82E+4 10 $NC=1.355E4 19$OC=1498 21$PC=0.373 6
129CS CG E$from CEL2, CEL3 measurements (1973Is04) relative to
129CS2CG the CEK line of 182.32 5 G. Other: 6.48 {I15} from differences of pairs
129CS3CG |g-ray transitions feeding g.s. and 6.54-keV isomer (1972Ta02)
129CS CG TI$from total I|g+ce feeding this level from higher levels, no direct
129CS2CG |e or |b feeding is expected due to J|p difference
129CS CG M$L3/L2=1.79 28
129CS L 135.69 8 3/2+
129CS E 1.4 1 7.4 4 6.39 4 8.8 5
129CSS E EAV=574.5 49$CK=0.714 4$CL=0.0969 5$CM+=0.02677 13
129CS G 129.14 10 5.51 28M1+E2 0.20 5 0.449 10 C
129CSS G KC=0.381 7$LC=0.054 3$MC=0.0112 6
129CS DG $EG=129.1 1, IG=51 (1972Ta02); |?40 units of intensity are from
129CS2DG {+129}Ba g.s. decay; remaining |?11 units of intensity are
129CS3DG from isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=129.1, IG=14.3 (1973Is04)
129CS DG $EG=129.1, ICE(K)=42.0, K/|SL>5.6; K, L1, M1, N1 observed (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=129.14 (1983TaZI)
129CSS G NC=0.00236 12$OC=0.000322 13$PC=1.477E-5 21
129CS CG M$L1:L2:L3::100.0 26:13.4 13:5.4 11. Other: K/|SL>5.6
129CS2CG (1961Ar05) gives |d(E2/M1)<0.5
129CS G 135.61 20 1.00 10M1(+E2) 0.4 LT 0.399 19
129CSS G KC=0.336 11$LC=0.050 7$MC=0.0103 15
129CSS G NC=0.0022 3$OC=0.00029 4$PC=1.290E-5 20
129CS DG $EG=135.6 3, IG=8.0 (1972Ta02); |?6 units of intensity are from
129CS2DG {+129}Ba g.s. decay; remaining |?2 units of intensity are
129CS3DG from isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=135.6, IG=2.06 (1973Is04)
129CS DG $EG=135.7, ICE(K)=5.5, K/|SL>6.1; K, L1, M1 observed (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=135.61 (1983TaZI)
129CS cG M,MR$from K/|SL>6.1 (1961Ar05)
129CS L 208.87 10 (5/2)+
129CS E 0.04 LT 0.20 LT 8.0 GT 0.24 LT ?
129CSS E EAV=542.0 49$CK=0.735 3$CL=0.0999 5$CM+=0.02759 12
129CS G 202.3 1 0.30 3 M1(+E2) 0.2 2 0.128 4
129CSS G KC=0.1095 23$LC=0.0148 14$MC=0.0030 3
129CSS G NC=0.00064 6$OC=8.9E-5 7$PC=4.25E-6 7
129CS cG E$uncertainty based on |g intensity in isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=202.3 1, IG=39 (1972Ta02); |?38 units of intensity are from isomer
129CS2DG decay
129CS DG $EG=202.4, IG=35.6 (1973Is04); mostly from isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=202.3, ICE(K)=25.5, K/|SL=6.9; K, L1 observed (1961Ar05)
129CS CG M$L1:L2:L3::100.0 44:7.0 19:4.5 16
129CS L 220.74 7 3/2+
129CS E 3.14 15 20.4 8 5.91 3 23.5 9
129CSS E EAV=536.8 49$CK=0.738 3$CL=0.1004 5$CM+=0.02772 12
129CS CE E$1243 35 (B+ end-point energy), relative B+ intensity=240 (measured
129CS2CE in 1961Ar05)
129CS G 85.1 3 0.054 5 [M1,E2] 2.4 10
129CSS G KC=1.6 4$LC=0.6 5$MC=0.13 10
129CSS G NC=0.027 20$OC=0.0032 23$PC=5.1E-5 3
129CS DG $EG=85.1, IG=0.09 (1973Is04). G not in 1972Ta02 and 1961Ar05
129CS G 214.30 10 13.4 7 M1(+E2) 0.5 5 0.113 8 C
129CSS G KC=0.095 4$LC=0.014 3$MC=0.0029 7
129CS DG $EG=214.3 1, IG=87 (1972Ta02); |?78 units of intensity are from
129CS2DG {+129}Ba g.s. decay; remaining |?9 units of intensity are
129CS3DG from isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=214.3, IG=19.8 (1973Is04)
129CS DG $EG=214.2, ICE(K)=13.7, K/|SL=6.9; K, L1, M1 observed (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=214.30 (1983TaZI)
129CSS G NC=0.00061 13$OC=8.3E-5 14$PC=3.59E-6 11
129CS CG M$EKC=0.097 3. Other: K/|SL=6.9 (1961Ar05) gives |d(E2/M1)<0.75
129CS G 220.83 10 8.5 4 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT 0.104 5 C
129CSS G KC=0.0879 23$LC=0.0131 19$MC=0.0027 4
129CSS G NC=0.00057 8$OC=7.7E-5 9$PC=3.30E-6 9
129CS cG M,MR$from EKC AND K/|SL=6.7 (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=220.8 1, IG=53 (1972Ta02); |?47 units of intensity are from
129CS2DG {+129}Ba g.s. decay; remaining |?6 units of intensity are
129CS3DG from isomer decay
129CS DG $EG=220.8, IG=13.1 (1973Is04)
129CS DG $EG=220.6, ICE(K)=6.5, K/|SL=6.7; K, L1, M1 observed (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=220.83 (1983TaZI)
129CS L 554.09 13 (1/2,3/2)+ A
129CS E 0.15 2 3.0 3 6.59 5 3.2 3
129CSS E EAV=390.0 49$CK=0.8110 18$CL=0.1108 3$CM+=0.03062 8
129CS CE E$975 60 (B+ end-point energy), relative B+ intensity=60 (measured
129CS2CE in 1961Ar05)
129CS G 333.9 3 0.44 4 M1,E2 0.0323 14
129CSS G KC=0.0273 18$LC=0.0040 3$MC=0.00083 7
129CSS G NC=0.000174 13$OC=2.35E-5 10$PC=1.00E-6 13
129CS CG M$from EKC=0.035 (1961AR05)
129CS DG $EG=333.9 7, IG=0.34 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=334.0, IG=0.95 (1973Is04)
129CS DG $EG=333.6, ICE(K)=0.23 (1961Ar05)
129CS DG $EG=333.9 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 554.0 2 2.94 29(M1,E2) 0.0083 12
129CSS G KC=0.0071 11$LC=0.00095 9$MC=0.000194 16
129CSS G NC=4.1E-5 4$OC=5.6E-6 6$PC=2.7E-7 5
129CS CG M$from EKC=0.016 (1961AR05)
129CS DG $EG=554.1 2, IG=15.5 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=553.9, IG=2.28 (1973Is04, unplaced)
129CS DG $EG=554.3, ICE(K)=0.25 (1961Ar05)
129CS L 1164.66 17 (1/2,3/2)+ A
129CS E 1.21 11 6.65 5 1.21 11
129CSS E CK=0.8491$CL=0.11786 6$CM+=0.03265 2
129CS G 944.5 3 0.112 11
129CS DG $EG=944.5 4, IG=0.71 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04 and 1961Ar05
129CS DG $EG=944.5 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1164.4 2 1.10 11(M1,E2)
129CS CG M$from EKC=0.0024 (1961AR05)
129CS DG $EG=1164.6 2, IG=8.8 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1164.2, IG=1.83 (1973Is04, placed from 1812 level)
129CS DG $EG=1163.3, ICE(K)=0.03 (1961Ar05)
129CS L 1609.67 22 (1/2,3/2) A
129CS E 0.25 2 6.95 5
129CSS E CK=0.8459 2$CL=0.1206 1$CM+=0.03354 4
129CS G 1389.3 3 0.051 5
129CS DG $G not in 1961Ar05, 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS G 1473.6 3 0.198 20
129CS DG $EG=1473.7 4, IG=1.4 (1972Ta02, placed from 1681 level). G not in
129CS2DG 1916Ar05
129CS DG $EG=1472.9, IG=0.88 (1973Is04, placed from 1681 level)
129CS DG $EG=1473.6 (1983TaZI)
129CS L 1648.64 22 (1/2+,3/2)
129CS E 0.047 5 7.63 6
129CSS E CK=0.8454 2$CL=0.1210 2$CM+=0.03366 4
129CS G 1439.8 3 0.047 5
129CS DG $EG=1439.9 5, IG=0.56 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04 and 1961Ar05
129CS DG $EG=1439.75 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1512.9 3
129CS DG $G not in 1961Ar05, 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS L 1694.25 23 (1/2,3/2) A
129CS E 0.046 4 7.58 5
129CSS E CK=0.8447 2$CL=0.12149 14$CM+=0.03383 5
129CS G 1140.3 3 0.0176 18
129CS DG $G not in 1961Ar05, 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS G 1558.4 3 0.028 3
129CS DG $G not in 1961Ar05, 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS L 1700.93 22 (1/2+,3/2) B
129CS E 0.17 1 7.01 4
129CSS E CK=0.8446 2$CL=0.12157 14$CM+=0.03385 5
129CS G 1693.8 3 0.080 8
129CS DG $EG=1693.8 5, IG=0.25 (1972Ta02, unplaced). G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1693.8 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1701.5 3 0.086 9
129CS DG $EG=1701.5 5, IG=0.34 (1972Ta02, placed from 1923 level).
129CS2DG G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1701.5 (1983TaZI)
129CS L 1830.52 16 (1/2,3/2) A
129CS E 1.18 8 5.99 4
129CSS E CK=0.8420 3$CL=0.12350 21$CM+=0.03448 7
129CS G 1276.6 3 0.118 12
129CS DG $EG=1276.2 4, IG=0.40 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04 and 1961Ar05
129CS DG $EG=1277.0 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1610.3 3 0.33 3
129CS DG $EG=1610.0 3, IG=1.8 (1972Ta02). G not in 1961Ar05 and 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1610.6 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1694.3 3 0.080 8
129CS DG $EG=1693.8 5, IG=0.25 (1972Ta02, unplaced). A 1693.8|g is
129CS2DG placed also from 1701 level. G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1694.3 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1830.3 3 0.65 7
129CS DG $EG=1830.4 2, IG=4.0 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1830.2, IG=0.46 (1973Is04, placed from 2019 level)
129CS L 1922.87 16 (1/2+,3/2) A
129CS E 0.16 1 6.70 4
129CSS E CK=0.8393 4$CL=0.1255 3$CM+=0.03514 10
129CS G 1368.6 3 0.055 6
129CS DG $G not in 1973Is04, 1972Ta02, 1961Ar05
129CS G 1787.5 3 0.022 2
129CS DG $EG=1787.9 4, IG=0.23 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1787.2 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1916.4 3 0.0132 13
129CS DG $EG=1916.4 5, IG=0.14 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1916.4 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1922.6 3 0.066 7
129CS DG $EG=1922.8 3, IG=0.31 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04
129CS DG $EG=1922.4 (1983TaZI)
129CS L 1954.03 14 (1/2+,3/2+)
129CS E 1.11 7 5.80 4
129CSS E CK=0.8382 5$CL=0.1264 4$CM+=0.03543 11
129CS G 1400.1 3 0.0121 12
129CS DG $EG=1399.9 5, IG=0.51 (1972Ta02). G not in 1973Is04 and 1961Ar05
129CS DG $EG=1400.3 (1983TaZI)
129CS G 1744.7 3 0.086 9
129CS DG $EG=1744.9 5, IG=0.25 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1744.6 (1973Is04)
129CS G 1818.8 3 0.080 8
129CS DG $EG=1818.6 3, IG=0.59 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1819.0 (1973Is04)
129CS G 1947.5 3 0.29 3
129CS DG $EG=1947.7 3, IG=1.6 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1947.3, IG=0.19 (1973Is04)
129CS G 1953.8 3 0.64 6
129CS DG $EG=1954.0 2, IG=3.7 (1972Ta02)
129CS DG $EG=1953.6, IG=0.45 (1973Is04)
129CS L 2077.67 22 (1/2+,3/2)
129CS cL E$level in 1983TaZI and 1972Ta02, not in 1973Si04. But different |g
129CS2cL rays are assigned in 1972Ta02 from this level.
129CS E 0.0022 2 8.23 6
129CSS E CK=0.8313 9$CL=0.1316 7$CM+=0.03712 22
129CS G 1856.7 3 0.0011 1
129CS DG $G not in 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS G 1869.0 3 0.0011 1
129CS DG $G not in 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04
129CS L 2254.8 3 B
129CS E ?
129CS G 2034.0 3
129CS DG $G not in 1972Ta02 and 1973Is04