126TE 126SB B- DECAY (12.35 D) 1975BA17,1972BU28 22NDS 202205
126TE H TYP=FUL$AUT=H. Iimura, J.Katakura, S. Ohya$CIT=NDS 180, 1 (2022)$
126TE2 H CUT=1-Oct-2021$
126TE c The decay scheme is that proposed by 1975Ba17 on the basis of
126TE2c |g|g-coin and E|g sums.
126TE c 1972Bu28: semi |g, |g|g
126TE c 1972SoZQ: Te(|g,pxn) chem;semi |g, |g|g
126TE c 1972Kr15: U(n,F) chem, oriented nuclei, |g(|q).
126TE c 1974Li14: {+124}Sn(|a,pn) chem; semi |g, |g|g
126TE c 1975Ba17: {+128}Te(d,|a) chem; semi |g, |g|g; |g|g(|q).
126TE c 1975So09: {+128}Te(d,|a) chem; semi |g, |g|g; scin-scin |b|g(t),
126TExc |g|g(t).
126TE c 1975Ba46: {+128}Te(d,|a) chem; scin-scin |b|g(t).
126TE c 2010Fe02:Fission product;plasma-mass spectrometry;semi(HPGe);|g,I|g,;
126TE2c liquid scin.;|b
126TE tG
126TE2tG |g|g(|q) data
126TE3tG
126TE4tG 1975Ba17
126TE5tG cascade A{-2} A{-4} cascade A{-2}
126TE+tG A{-4}
126TE6tG -------------------------------------------------------------------
126TE7tG 224-990 0.13 {I5} -0.01 {I4} 278-857 -0.10 {I6}
126TE+tG 0.10 {I5}
126TE8tG 297-857 0.16 {I4} 0.01 {I2} 593-857 -0.08 {I3}
126TE+tG 0.03 {I3}
126TE9tG 857-696 -0.04 {I2} 0.03 {I2} 587-667 -0.08 {I2} -
126TE+tG 0.01 {I2}
126TEAtG -------------------------------------------------------------------
126TEBtG
126TE cG E$from 1975Ba17, unless otherwise noted.
126TE cG RI$From 1975Ba17, unless otherwise noted.
126TE cG M,MR From adopted levels, gammas
126TE cG E(A),RI(A)$From 2010Fe02 with {+126}Sn/{+126}Sb equilibrium source
126TE2cG whitch include |g-rays from {+126}Sb |b{+-} decay (12.35 d) and
126TE3cG {+126}Sb|b{+-} decay (19.15 M). The |g-ray could belong to either, or
126TE4cG both decays. In each case, RI's must be corrected.
126TE cL E$E(levels) are based on a least-squares fit (by evaluators)
126TE cL J Spin and parity values are those given under adopted
126TE2cL levels.
126SB P 0.0 (8-) 12.35 D 6 3670 30
126TE N 0.996 1 1.0 1.0
126TE cN NR$The evaluators assume no |b{+-} feedings to gs, 666.5(2+) and
126TE2cN 1362.1(4+) levels, so I|g(666.5|g)=I|g(695.0|g)=100
126TE PN 3
126TE G 726 1 0.05 A
126TE G 730.7 100.13 A
126TE G 1191 1 0.27 A
126TE G 1290 1 0.23 A
126TE G 1589 1 0.09 A
126TE L 0.0 0+ STABLE
126TE L 666.5 32+
126TE G 666.5 3 100 E2 0.00378 6 C
126TE cG |a(K)exp=0.0034 (assumed as E2 (1971Or04))
126TES G KC=0.00324 5$LC=0.000429 6$MC=8.58E-5 12
126TE L 1361.5 44+
126TE G 695.0 2 100 E2 0.00340 5 C
126TE cG E$from 1972Bu28. The authors of 1975Ba17 quoted E|g=694.8 {I2} in text
126TE2cG from 1972SoZQ. However, there is no uncertainty of the E|g in 1972SoZQ.
126TE cG RI$I|g=129 {I7} (Sum 695|g and 697|g) (1975Ba17). I|g=100
126TE2cG from 1972Bu28, 1972SoZQ, 1969KlZZ. From the decay scheme and |a,
126TE3cG I|g=100 is apparent and the uncertainty is negligibly small.
126TE cG |a(K)exp(695|g+697|g)=0.0030 (1971Or04).
126TES G KC=0.00292 5$LC=0.000384 6$MC=7.67E-5 11
126TE L 1776.1 4 6+ 68 PS 2
126TE cL T unweighted av of 66 ps {I3} from (|?600|b)(|?700|g)(t)
126TE2cL (1975Ba46) and 69 ps {I2} from (1370-1500|b)(695|g)(t) (1975So09).
126TE B 20 4 10.31 10 1U
126TES B EAV=734 13
126TE G 414.7 2 83.6 21E2 0.01405 C
126TE cG |a(K)exp=0.015 (1971Or04). Obtained from ratio of
126TE2cG |a(K)exp(414.8|g) to |a(K)exp(666.3|g) (1971Or04).
126TES G KC=0.01188 17$LC=0.001740 25$MC=0.000350 5
126TE L 2218.3 45-
126TE B 3.0 13 9.65 20
126TES B EAV=537 13
126TE G 856.8 2 17.7 9 E1+M2 +0.029 6 C
126TE L 2396.2 66+
126TE B 0.9 4 10.68 21 1U
126TES B EAV=471 13
126TE G 619.9 4 0.9 1 M1(+E2) -0.17 +6-8 C
126TE G 1036.2 121.00 5 E2 C
126TE L 2496.7 57- 0.152 NS 5
126TE cL T from (1200|b)(|?700|g)(t) (1975Ba46);
126TE2cL other: 0.15 ns {I2} from (610